I see nothing at all odd about him being concerned about his dog. I do find it odd that he didn't seem to be concerned about why he was being arrested. On a side note, as a previous juror, all this questioning about which specific route the deputy drove in on would have me nodding.
I know this is totally unrelated and random but where do Americans keep their dogs without fenced in yards? I don't know if it is the British culture that has been left over in my country but we have fenced in yards, if not all around at least the backyards, just to keep children and animals save from running into the road or even worse, disappearing. Not judging just curious.😊
@@honeybunch5765 This is a trailer park arrangement he is living in. He has a long transportable house (no wheels ). Other houses may in fact be big caravans. So basically nobody owns the land where they are sitting and therefore the can't put up any fences. It's a crappy way to live but many Americans have no choice.
@@honeybunch5765 Most homeowners backyards have fenced-in, electronic fence, or post with long lead attached. The defendant lives in a trailer park/mobile home park. He pays RJR Property Management a monthly rate to keep his trailer on a rented lot. Every Management Company has different rules but most don’t allow renters to build on rented land.
Dogs live inside. You can’t keep dogs chained up it’s cruel. Why have a pet you keep on a chain that’s in humane. Get a security camera if u need to know if someone is coming on your property.,
@@debsayler624 but you would still question 🤔 why the f*** they are arresting me specially with that force specially if i knew the officer personally. U would be come on mate whats the F is going on !!!!! Then don't forget about my dog
Had he already saw them taking pics of his truck? Likely he already knew he was a suspect when his dog was clearly a point of contention, at least in his mind, ever since RJR took over management and the owners wanted a pet policy change requiring CI to get an Emotional Assistance Pet Exemption (Changing the pet policy was BS move for the Residents that own their homes and rent their space especially since the county already has protective stipulations; on leash laws, rabies vax, dangerous biters. I wouldn't stab the Office lady over 40 times about it though I might contact Landlord Tentant Rights Hotline and ask for mediation/arbitration.)
don't know if he's guilty or not, but these prosecutors are sure some of the worst have seen, like they are on a hotel mystery weekend away, trying to find out who the killer was...
@@jennyd9144 guess will wait to hear closing arguments in this case, not sure prosecutors have beyond reasonable doubt here, especially prosecutors just sitting there kind of trying on California style prosecution when it's North Dakota tbh
Really, truly the states needs to replace their attorney and the police needs to and find the real killer and most likely the killer is closer to home than anticipated!
I see a lot of comments here that he’s not guilty or no evidence or no motive…well motive is not an element of proving the crime, we can’t be in the mind or heart of a murderer, yes it’s good to have it because it ties to the why but not an element to prove guilt, we haven’t seen all the evidence yet but so far it’s a puzzle, maybe not one piece itself proves guilt but all the pieces together will paint the full picture, wait until ALL evidence is presented on both sides before you decide. Once you start connecting all the dots and all the circumstantial evidence builds to too many coincidences, iit will therefore show that this defendant is the person that committed the crime. This defendant did have connections to these victims and they do have so far evidence that is starting to point to him. I think he was after one of these victims and the others were collateral damage. It clearly was somebody that knew them and was getting familiar with their schedule because the same truck showed up a week before at the same time as a week later of the murders, staking out the place, in a truck very similar to the defendants.
It’s not an element, but without motive there is a LOT of room for reasonable doubt. The defence only needs to prove criminal doubt. Prosecution needs to prove he did it BEYOND a reasonable doubt. I think he’ll walk
@@jennyd9144 I don’t agree at all that he will walk, yet. I’ve been a jury foreman and I agree that motive clearly helps but if there is mounting evidence that he did it then the jury will not just ignore that just because there isn’t a provider motive. And just because there isn’t a provided motive doesn’t mean there wasn’t one. Now if all the other evidence doesn’t prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he did it then yes most likely he will walk, so far the chips are stacking up against him.
@@GrizzlyUrsusArctos ive been watching the KYFR full videos on Facebook and it’s the same as what’s being said on court TVs TH-cam channel. So if there’s a bunch of evidence on “local tv” they might want to start getting to whatever evidence that is.. soon. Because as of now, it’s all circumstantial.
Why does Krohmer look sooo nervous? Aside from his eye shots at Chad Isaak, which I find kind of strange. I’m sure Chad Isaak really wants to crack Krohmer’s neck now…
I felt like the vague description of some rust spots on the white truck is pretty weak to go full swat on this man. Hope to hear better identification besides his odd gait, too.
I saw a vet lived in a trailer on a LOT of land. As I get older, I would rather live in a shoebox on a huge piece of property than to live by my neighbors. Cat killers. I hate animal abusers., just saying…
Cops are known for lying about anything…they get a free pass. I’ve been there. They lie when u have video and they think if they say it it puts a tiny dig in the defendant.
Funny, I’ve been watching the whole trial. I must have missed that part where they said they found any of the victim’s blood in the truck. Or maybe they never said that
They didn’t say who’s blood it was just blood found and yes the truck is exact. Let’s be frank it’s him and we all know it’s a town of 1,300 and he happens to have things that fit the description of the killer. FYI who cleans their knifes in the laundry come on.
I’ve watched every second of testimony and this is a CLOSE case. The truck identification is STRONG. That’s all they’ve presented strong so far but it’s very compelling. A lot of great stuff by Defense on cross. Heavy evidence to come today
if I was on this Jury Id have made my mind up already. Innocent or guilty, he has to walk. Just look at this kindergarten cop and prosecution. If this guy can be a prosecutor anyone can.
how TF he "jumped the gun"? It's not up to him, he doesn't issue the warrant, he just has to arrest the suspect. He's a McClean country sheriff, this is a Morton county crime, warrant was issued and crime is investigated primarily by Mandan PD and BCI
Ok, I’m sorry but I guess I’m a perfect suspect bc my ONLY question would be WHERE IS MY DOG!!!! Now!!! He just seems more credible after that line of questioning
Because of the area they live in, a lot of the cops and lawyers are not used to dealing with these types of crimes. I’ve never seen a trial being conducted, with everyone sitting down and not knowing how to REALLY ask/answer questions. The defendant looks tired, confused and the exact opposite of someone in his profession. Having said all that, I think he’s guilty.
Mandan has a population of over 20,000 people and Bismark is right across the river with nearly 130,000 people so I'm pretty sure they've dealt with murder before.
Too many holes in this testimony... In North Dakota, considering the inclement weather such as the snow and salt used to clean the roads I would want to see other white truck comparisons for rust spots. How many tenants other than Issak owned this same vehicle and how many of the evicted had the same vehicle. Also, what about the victim's girlfriend's ex husband ...what did he drive??? Most dog owners would be concerned about what happens with their pets...why is this so important? I thought it would be a "conflict of interest" being he was a client of Issak. ???
I would like to know what Isaacs motive for killing these particular four individuals. Could it be because of the owners husband having an affair and it went sour?
Sounds like the local cops had to pin it on somebody, because they spent so many resources watching this guy. Not guilty! Ps. He would have blood everywhere.
Why is this police officer even part of the case? He has a interest in the case from the point of calling in the truck. He is invested and another officer should of taken over the case. My layman’s thoughts.
I believe in this cop as much as I do in Santa clause. This is his hero moment, he’s got a personal investment. That suspect is concerned about his dog is a positive
Blood in and on his vehicle, shell casings in his freezer, surveillance of someone entering the business in camouflaged clothing, exiting the business, arriving at a nearby parking lot in the same clothing, and driving away in the defendant’s car. A ‘hero’ moment for the cop? What does that mean? He has to testify, doesn’t he? - Most cops, who put their lives on the line every day, deserve hero status in my opinion.
Nada Gabri are you related to this scumbag POS murderer? You seem to be defending him in several posts. Why are you ignoring all of the physical evidence?? But He cares about his damn stupid dog right?
Italia- His damn, stupid god? If you have pets, I pity them. The only thing this mass murderer gets credit for is making sure his dog is cared for. Should the dog starve in the streets because his owner is a killer? Shame on you.
They put this innocent man in prison I believe because they needed to close this case. There's absolutely no evidence, including the actual CCTV footage of the company showing 2 people, completely different body size of Isaac's body frame, and still wanted to lock him up and charge him because he was at McDonald's. Taking a trifling McDonald's worker's statement to prosecute only is going to cost the State lots of money for a false imprisonment. There was absolutely no evidence watching this entire trial linking this man to the murders, including absolutely no blood or DNA. This was an inside job and either a cop or family of a cop who wanted his buddy to be off the hook so they blamed the awkward chiropractor.
Since they cannot find a real life motive for the murders, I am wondering if he had some sort of delusuonal disorder going on. Retired psych RN All that rage directed toward those 4. It would be extremely interesting to find out the motive.
I wonder if they have asked Chad, where he was the day of murders? What was he doing at that early hrs of morning, any alibis?? I would suspect someone closer to victims, it would make more sense, and a motive!!
I can’t understand how so many commentators think this guy is innocent?! Is the knife and murder clothes in his dryer, 9 shell casings in his sock, gloves soaked in bleach with the unique dots on the fingertips (same as the prints left in blood at crime scene) same truck with exact same rust marks, same distinctive walk as this guy, didn’t ask why 15 cops were arresting him, has one of the victims business cards in his trailer…. Just to name a few!! Open your eyes people this psycho is GUILTY and his motive is irrelevant.
You don’t even know the dumber of dogs he owns yet you think you’ve got motive figured out when cops haven’t. This is a LIE! I’ve watched every second of testimony streamed and they acknowledged there were NO issues with him as a tenant. Stop lying to feel important Ken
@@austinhansen9079 that's actually not true, he DID in fact have complaints regarding his dog, singular. I live here, that's been known for the last two years now
@@michelleflynn9725 I heard Jackie testify and I recall her saying they didn't own any of the mobile homes on the property, they were all owner-owned. They were only responsible for collecting the lot rent, maintenance, lawn-mowing and snow removal.
How? His truck was tracked from the scene to Washburn, they found matching shell casings a knife and the suspect clothing in his dryer and his house was bleached to shit. That alone, doesn't get much stronger evidence.
I agree completely.. I watch a lot of trials.. this is the first one I’m pretty much absolutely positive the prosecution went ahead with a shaky case with zero motive..
To many things point in his direction yes they haven’t proven that it’s exactly him but let’s be honest we know it’s him and he did it. We don’t know the motive but we know he’s guilty.
Hope the pup is ok ! And very sorry for this senseless tradgedy whom ever did it ! What has happened to settling problems with talking shoot maybe fist fights would be better than murder !! Jesus is coming back soon the Devil busy taking people out with him ! Stop and think before you let your life get so out of control you kill someone ! Give it to God and move on with your life 💖💖💖
The chiropractor is not a doctor. His attorney calls him a "Doctor" Funny. It is really a bone masseuse. Free country to call themselves but confuses the public.
Chiropractors are doctors…. They go to school for 7 years. They only need two more to be a physician. If you are a doctor then people call you doctor. There’s nothing weird about it. I’ve worked for a few doctors and that’s how it is unless you are friends with that person.
The more 'evidence ' they come up with, the more hilarious & obvious this whole charade is. The surviving wife is responsible, and i bet shares in her company helped frame him.
WATCH #CourtTV LIVE - ND v. #ChadIsaak - court.tv/FindUs
#RJRMurders
I see nothing at all odd about him being concerned about his dog. I do find it odd that he didn't seem to be concerned about why he was being arrested. On a side note, as a previous juror, all this questioning about which specific route the deputy drove in on would have me nodding.
I know this is totally unrelated and random but where do Americans keep their dogs without fenced in yards? I don't know if it is the British culture that has been left over in my country but we have fenced in yards, if not all around at least the backyards, just to keep children and animals save from running into the road or even worse, disappearing. Not judging just curious.😊
@@honeybunch5765 This is a trailer park arrangement he is living in. He has a long transportable house (no wheels ). Other houses may in fact be big caravans. So basically nobody owns the land where they are sitting and therefore the can't put up any fences. It's a crappy way to live but many Americans have no choice.
@@honeybunch5765 Most homeowners backyards have fenced-in, electronic fence, or post with long lead attached.
The defendant lives in a trailer park/mobile home park. He pays RJR Property Management a monthly rate to keep his trailer on a rented lot. Every Management Company has different rules but most don’t allow renters to build on rented land.
Dogs live inside. You can’t keep dogs chained up it’s cruel. Why have a pet you keep on a chain that’s in humane. Get a security camera if u need to know if someone is coming on your property.,
@@F_Tim1961why is a Dr living in a trailer park though?
Of course he's worried about his dog. I'd be more concerned if he wasnt worried about his dog. This whole case is bizarre and circumstantial.
The first thing I mention is the dog is gentle. She just sounds vicious.
Except the victims blood is in his truck, and the knife was found at his home. That’s more than circumstantial!
They found the clothes, the shoes, a knife and a dismantled firearm DOUSED in BLEACH IN HIS FREAKING FREEZER!! Bubba’s goose is cooked, hun!
What’s so odd about asking that your dog be looked after.
Because he never asks why they swarmed him like flies on 💩!
@Chosen Angel I think this cop is trying too hard to convict this man with embellishments. Whether guilty or not he’s entitled to a fair trial.
Right ? My dog is my child. She is very important to me !
@@debsayler624 but you would still question 🤔 why the f*** they are arresting me specially with that force specially if i knew the officer personally. U would be come on mate whats the F is going on !!!!! Then don't forget about my dog
Had he already saw them taking pics of his truck? Likely he already knew he was a suspect when his dog was clearly a point of contention, at least in his mind, ever since RJR took over management and the owners wanted a pet policy change requiring CI to get an Emotional Assistance Pet Exemption
(Changing the pet policy was BS move for the Residents that own their homes and rent their space especially since the county already has protective stipulations; on leash laws, rabies vax, dangerous biters. I wouldn't stab the Office lady over 40 times about it though I might contact Landlord Tentant Rights Hotline and ask for mediation/arbitration.)
Well of course if someone feels like a dog is part of the family they want to make sure that they are not left to starve to death.
What , are you not allowed to look out your windows ?
When are they going to calculate the height of the suspect in the security video and compare it to the height of the defendant
When they have the victims blood in his truck and the knife in his dryer , the height doesn’t matter as much.
don't know if he's guilty or not, but these prosecutors are sure some of the worst have seen, like they are on a hotel mystery weekend away, trying to find out who the killer was...
One of the reasons I don’t trust their case and believe this man is innocent.
@@jennyd9144
guess will wait to hear closing arguments in this case, not sure prosecutors have beyond reasonable doubt here, especially prosecutors just sitting there kind of trying on California style prosecution when it's North Dakota tbh
Like reading from a script, word for word 🥴
Sounds like they arrested him because the cop's mother had an appointment that day.
If he did this crime...death penalty would be recommended.
There's no death penalty in North Dakota.
Really, truly the states needs to replace their attorney and the police needs to and find the real killer and most likely the killer is closer to home than anticipated!
Stfu and go looks the overwhelming evidence they have against this scumbag.
Surprised Isaak's attorneys don't tell him to stop making gestures in the court room.
I see a lot of comments here that he’s not guilty or no evidence or no motive…well motive is not an element of proving the crime, we can’t be in the mind or heart of a murderer, yes it’s good to have it because it ties to the why but not an element to prove guilt, we haven’t seen all the evidence yet but so far it’s a puzzle, maybe not one piece itself proves guilt but all the pieces together will paint the full picture, wait until ALL evidence is presented on both sides before you decide. Once you start connecting all the dots and all the circumstantial evidence builds to too many coincidences, iit will therefore show that this defendant is the person that committed the crime. This defendant did have connections to these victims and they do have so far evidence that is starting to point to him. I think he was after one of these victims and the others were collateral damage. It clearly was somebody that knew them and was getting familiar with their schedule because the same truck showed up a week before at the same time as a week later of the murders, staking out the place, in a truck very similar to the defendants.
It’s not an element, but without motive there is a LOT of room for reasonable doubt.
The defence only needs to prove criminal doubt. Prosecution needs to prove he did it BEYOND a reasonable doubt.
I think he’ll walk
Wait until all evidence is presented. You - he’s GUILTY 🤡
@@jennyd9144 I don’t agree at all that he will walk, yet. I’ve been a jury foreman and I agree that motive clearly helps but if there is mounting evidence that he did it then the jury will not just ignore that just because there isn’t a provider motive. And just because there isn’t a provided motive doesn’t mean there wasn’t one. Now if all the other evidence doesn’t prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he did it then yes most likely he will walk, so far the chips are stacking up against him.
zero positive identification that Isaak did this crime
You might want to keep watching if you believe that lmao
@@jordanalandry1866 ok cool I’m waiting to be proved wrong
If you read the transcripts put out by the local news and the actual live stream. You’ll see all the evidence. It’s def not on this channel
@@GrizzlyUrsusArctos ive been watching the KYFR full videos on Facebook and it’s the same as what’s being said on court TVs TH-cam channel. So if there’s a bunch of evidence on “local tv” they might want to start getting to whatever evidence that is.. soon. Because as of now, it’s all circumstantial.
This dude is guilty for sure
This trial scares the s#!÷ out of me. How can they do this to someone without a motive?
He has 1, hes ain't saying. 🤐
Motive is a tool not a requirement compared to beyond reasonable doubt.
He's a divorced, single middle aged male living alone with his dog in a trailer park.
@@killebrew69 Lol! BINGO!
As it shod, even most commenters already have this guy CONVICTED
Why does Krohmer look sooo nervous? Aside from his eye shots at Chad Isaak, which I find kind of strange.
I’m sure Chad Isaak really wants to crack Krohmer’s neck now…
I felt like the vague description of some rust spots on the white truck is pretty weak to go full swat on this man. Hope to hear better identification besides his odd gait, too.
The physical size of assailant on the video matche Mr. Issak as well.
@@killebrew69 they haven’t presented ANY evidence of the suspect‘s from video footage except to say he has a “long stride”.
Why lie?
The intensity of the SWAT is based off the severity and or depravity of the crime not the level of suspicion..
2 jurors fell asleep in courtroom this week....wow!!!
Definitely a cure for insomnia…
Oops, Mr Isaak forgot to change his natural walking motion leaving the area of crime scene!
Hahahahha!!!
Doctors live in trailers in North Dakota??? Wow!
🤣🤣🤣🤣
I saw a vet lived in a trailer on a LOT of land. As I get older, I would rather live in a shoebox on a huge piece of property than to live by my neighbors. Cat killers. I hate animal abusers., just saying…
OMG! He smerked! He must be guilty.
Cops are known for lying about anything…they get a free pass. I’ve been there. They lie when u have video and they think if they say it it puts a tiny dig in the defendant.
How are people saying he’s not guilty? His truck was identified & they found blood in his pickup
Funny, I’ve been watching the whole trial. I must have missed that part where they said they found any of the victim’s blood in the truck.
Or maybe they never said that
No.. they did NOT find the victims blood in his car. NOPE
We say he’s not guilty because we are paying attention . Clearly you are not.
They didn’t say who’s blood it was just blood found and yes the truck is exact. Let’s be frank it’s him and we all know it’s a town of 1,300 and he happens to have things that fit the description of the killer. FYI who cleans their knifes in the laundry come on.
@@jennyd9144 😂 watch closely wise one ! Obviously you’re not seeing all the facts
Since when do lawyers question a witness without standing up?
Some states don't allow it.
Found that odd/disrespectful to the court
Covid
Very disrespectful!
Its covid protocol...duh!
Why do the prosecutor not keep eye contact with the cop! He is always in a huddle !!!
I can't keep up with this.
Drink some coffee and a couple shots of no doze👍🏻
I’ve watched every second of testimony and this is a CLOSE case.
The truck identification is STRONG.
That’s all they’ve presented strong so far but it’s very compelling.
A lot of great stuff by Defense on cross. Heavy evidence to come today
They haven't even gotten to the shell casings, the knife and clothes in his dryer.
@@jordanalandry1866 I don’t think those items are as conclusive as you think. But that will all be addressed.
@@jennyd9144 doesn't matter conclusivity on its own, all tied together it's a pretty damning case, more than adequate to convict
Yes heavy evidence today like bent knife in washing machine and partial revolver in freezer!
Where can you find coverage of the entire case?
8 inches and a rust spot is between you and prison
if I was on this Jury Id have made my mind up already. Innocent or guilty, he has to walk. Just look at this kindergarten cop and prosecution. If this guy can be a prosecutor anyone can.
The suspect is one big DUMMY leaving all the evidence in his trailer, that's for sure!
@@killebrew69 who cares, the state should provide a fair trial not some comedy sketch lol.
I think this cop jumped the gun on this arrest.
how TF he "jumped the gun"? It's not up to him, he doesn't issue the warrant, he just has to arrest the suspect. He's a McClean country sheriff, this is a Morton county crime, warrant was issued and crime is investigated primarily by Mandan PD and BCI
Cop knows he’s making this up.
Ok, I’m sorry but I guess I’m a perfect suspect bc my ONLY question would be WHERE IS MY DOG!!!! Now!!! He just seems more credible after that line of questioning
Because of the area they live in, a lot of the cops and lawyers are not used to dealing with these types of crimes. I’ve never seen a trial being conducted, with everyone sitting down and not knowing how to REALLY ask/answer questions. The defendant looks tired, confused and the exact opposite of someone in his profession. Having said all that, I think he’s guilty.
Mandan has a population of over 20,000 people and Bismark is right across the river with nearly 130,000 people so I'm pretty sure they've dealt with murder before.
Maybe he’s depressed and on meds?
Too many holes in this testimony... In North Dakota, considering the inclement weather such as the snow and salt used to clean the roads I would want to see other white truck comparisons for rust spots. How many tenants other than Issak owned this same vehicle and how many of the evicted had the same vehicle. Also, what about the victim's girlfriend's ex husband ...what did he drive??? Most dog owners would be concerned about what happens with their pets...why is this so important? I thought it would be a "conflict of interest" being he was a client of Issak. ???
Apparently, not everyone on trial is guilty like in this case.
I would like to know what Isaacs motive for killing these particular four individuals. Could it be because of the owners husband having an affair and it went sour?
Is there a motive?
Only in a sick and twisted hateful mind.
No not for the suspect but for the people that arrested there sure is.
Sounds like the local cops had to pin it on somebody, because they spent so many resources watching this guy. Not guilty!
Ps. He would have blood everywhere.
Why is this police officer even part of the case? He has a interest in the case from the point of calling in the truck. He is invested and another officer should of taken over the case. My layman’s thoughts.
I believe in this cop as much as I do in Santa clause. This is his hero moment, he’s got a personal investment. That suspect is concerned about his dog is a positive
Blood in and on his vehicle, shell casings in his freezer, surveillance of someone entering the business in camouflaged clothing, exiting the business, arriving at a nearby parking lot in the same clothing, and driving away in the defendant’s car. A ‘hero’ moment for the cop? What does that mean? He has to testify, doesn’t he? - Most cops, who put their lives on the line every day, deserve hero status in my opinion.
Nada Gabri are you related to this scumbag POS murderer? You seem to be defending him in several posts. Why are you ignoring all of the physical evidence?? But He cares about his damn stupid dog right?
Italia- His damn, stupid god? If you have pets, I pity them. The only thing this mass murderer gets credit for is making sure his dog is cared for. Should the dog starve in the streets because his owner is a killer? Shame on you.
They put this innocent man in prison I believe because they needed to close this case. There's absolutely no evidence, including the actual CCTV footage of the company showing 2 people, completely different body size of Isaac's body frame, and still wanted to lock him up and charge him because he was at McDonald's. Taking a trifling McDonald's worker's statement to prosecute only is going to cost the State lots of money for a false imprisonment. There was absolutely no evidence watching this entire trial linking this man to the murders, including absolutely no blood or DNA. This was an inside job and either a cop or family of a cop who wanted his buddy to be off the hook so they blamed the awkward chiropractor.
It was rage to kill 4 people...was he under psychiatric help at the time?
Since they cannot find a real life motive for the murders, I am wondering if he had some sort of delusuonal disorder going on. Retired psych RN All that rage directed toward those 4. It would be extremely interesting to find out the motive.
@@glendagrant9042 I'm a psychic RN currently and wish I was retired...lol anyways hope you are enjoying your retirement ❤
@Still Sidda a psych RN excuse my typo
Millions of people receive psychiatric help.. that’s not a motive
@Still Sidda lol 🤣🤣 I know right lol
I wonder if they have asked Chad, where he was the day of murders? What was he doing at that early hrs of morning, any alibis?? I would suspect someone closer to victims, it would make more sense, and a motive!!
Yeah… this isn’t helping the prosecution’s case at all.
The truck is a perfect match. The smoking gun. Guilty!
So, the defendant had plenty of warning and time to get rid of stuff they supposedly later found? By the way, he's still too tall...
I can’t understand how so many commentators think this guy is innocent?! Is the knife and murder clothes in his dryer, 9 shell casings in his sock, gloves soaked in bleach with the unique dots on the fingertips (same as the prints left in blood at crime scene) same truck with exact same rust marks, same distinctive walk as this guy, didn’t ask why 15 cops were arresting him, has one of the victims business cards in his trailer…. Just to name a few!! Open your eyes people this psycho is GUILTY and his motive is irrelevant.
He had complaints regarding his barking dog(s).
You don’t even know the dumber of dogs he owns yet you think you’ve got motive figured out when cops haven’t.
This is a LIE!
I’ve watched every second of testimony streamed and they acknowledged there were NO issues with him as a tenant.
Stop lying to feel important Ken
@@austinhansen9079 that's actually not true, he DID in fact have complaints regarding his dog, singular. I live here, that's been known for the last two years now
@@michelleflynn9725 I heard Jackie testify and I recall her saying they didn't own any of the mobile homes on the property, they were all owner-owned. They were only responsible for collecting the lot rent, maintenance, lawn-mowing and snow removal.
This seems like a very shaky case.
How? His truck was tracked from the scene to Washburn, they found matching shell casings a knife and the suspect clothing in his dryer and his house was bleached to shit. That alone, doesn't get much stronger evidence.
He's not guilty!
LoL
There's no way this guy is guilty. They just needed someone to pin it on.
I agree completely.. I watch a lot of trials.. this is the first one I’m pretty much absolutely positive the prosecution went ahead with a shaky case with zero motive..
First thing I would be worried about are my pets. I drive my dogs and sometimes Roger the rabbit around . I hope his dog is safe. 🙏
To many things point in his direction yes they haven’t proven that it’s exactly him but let’s be honest we know it’s him and he did it. We don’t know the motive but we know he’s guilty.
This just may end up a hung jury.
Hope the pup is ok ! And very sorry for this senseless tradgedy whom ever did it ! What has happened to settling problems with talking shoot maybe fist fights would be better than murder !! Jesus is coming back soon the Devil busy taking people out with him ! Stop and think before you let your life get so out of control you kill someone ! Give it to God and move on with your life 💖💖💖
The chiropractor is not a doctor. His attorney calls him a "Doctor" Funny. It is really a bone masseuse. Free country to call themselves but confuses the public.
Chiropractors are doctors…. They go to school for 7 years. They only need two more to be a physician. If you are a doctor then people call you doctor. There’s nothing weird about it. I’ve worked for a few doctors and that’s how it is unless you are friends with that person.
Def😴▶▶▶
Cop. Can I show you. Duh. Like that wasn’t rehearsed 🙄
The more 'evidence ' they come up with, the more hilarious & obvious this whole charade is. The surviving wife is responsible, and i bet shares in her company helped frame him.
The lawyer questioning with the glasses & stubble is cute!
THATS MY HUSBAND..STAY AWAY
Wrong site…I think you are looking for Tinder
Detainment and arrest. Same thing. 🙄. Cops a 🤡
You can be detained without being arrested,you obviously have not had many interactions with law enforcement.
Wow. The defense is relentless.
Very damaging evidence day after day,they have been dealt a very bad hand!
Omfg- it’s “based ON”- based ON your experience; based ON your training.
Ya’ can’t base anything “off” something. Sounds like 12-year old...🤬🤬🤬🤓😎
When he said the mud on the truck …then asked the cop”and that’s based on your training?” Hahaha. Yeah lots of mud splatter training.