Called By the Grave - Explaining Staples

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ก.ค. 2023
  • Called by the Grave goes into the category of an anti-handtrap.
    editing by @ParfaitOperationalGuidebook
    -----------------------------------------
    #yugioh #shorts
    / theduellogs
    / hirumared
    / theduellogs
  • เกม

ความคิดเห็น • 227

  • @BatmannotBruceWayne1
    @BatmannotBruceWayne1 ปีที่แล้ว +169

    Called by the grave does not negate Photon Orbital’s search effect, yet everyone tries to anyway

    • @wBlack__-
      @wBlack__- ปีที่แล้ว +21

      because it activates as an equip spell right?

    • @rajkanishu
      @rajkanishu ปีที่แล้ว +21

      one of the reasons I can get away with playing Galaxy Eyes in MD lol

    • @Themeir
      @Themeir ปีที่แล้ว +41

      @@wBlack__- yes, it's search effect is an equip spell effect but it's effect to equip itself is a monster effect

    • @nunberx1thexyzmaster346
      @nunberx1thexyzmaster346 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thanks for that

    • @JunTheDude32
      @JunTheDude32 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Thx I'll remember that the next time i visit 2018

  • @neilbryankilaton5893
    @neilbryankilaton5893 ปีที่แล้ว +152

    The fact it's a common card in the set of Flames of Destruction......

    • @thezestylime0989
      @thezestylime0989 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      good??? would you want this to be a 300 dollar secret rare you needed 3 off at the time?

    • @kingblacky11
      @kingblacky11 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      You can get it in the Albaz Strike Structure as a common.

    • @thezestylime0989
      @thezestylime0989 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@kingblacky11 ok but in its original core set printing its a common.

    • @MrStinkyBumBum
      @MrStinkyBumBum ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thezestylime0989no ones paying $300 for cards they’re gonna use in a actual duel💀

    • @empeeor3354
      @empeeor3354 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      ​@@MrStinkyBumBumeldlich was a mandatory 2-3 copies when it was still at 100$

  • @XionSteel
    @XionSteel ปีที่แล้ว +134

    called by is actually a card i like, people thinks that its cancerous for the game as a broken going first card to stop hand traps or else a going second card to stop any immediate follow up. But i consider a million flood gates and a deck that is 1/4 hand traps even worse, and that shit barely ever gets hit on banlists.

    • @Renfrost_x_JetstreamRen38
      @Renfrost_x_JetstreamRen38 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I'll amen to that, brother

    • @lordvika2526
      @lordvika2526 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Thats because yu-gi players can get very salty because its a card that counters their deck. especially now days that called by is a one of card and you happen to have it at the right time

    • @donjewelio
      @donjewelio ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lordvika2526simple solution. Put it back to 3. That way they can’t complain that you have the one-of on an important turn

    • @GenuineA-HOLE
      @GenuineA-HOLE 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I mean how can ppl complain how tf else am I supposed to stop you from completely locking me out the game 🤣 we play in a format where you have to play board breaking decks at this point

    • @zenbozic6184
      @zenbozic6184 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i agree, but i also think its a card that shouldnt be limited/semi-limited, it feels like a sack when you get hit by it in the tcg, it should either be banned or at 3

  • @nnnp634
    @nnnp634 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    It might be top 10 spells of all time.

  • @wicked.a950
    @wicked.a950 ปีที่แล้ว +95

    It would have been funny to see it used in the series against kuriboh

    • @jackryderproductions1030
      @jackryderproductions1030 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I mean its not like its the kuriboh brothers... probably would of been better for sangan or witch of the black forrest. But that would be so f*cked. New protag "I use my new kuriboh varient." Call by the grave...

    • @Dave2kool4skool
      @Dave2kool4skool ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Actually, I think Kuriboh is too strong as its effect happens in the damage step so you can't use Called by the Grave against Kuriboh

    • @jackryderproductions1030
      @jackryderproductions1030 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Dave2kool4skool its a quickplay spell... and setting it in the anime (post battle city) makes it a quick play card. Except when it doesn't

    • @omgIoIwtf
      @omgIoIwtf ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jackryderproductions1030that can’t be used during the damage step lol

    • @jackryderproductions1030
      @jackryderproductions1030 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@omgIoIwtf damn

  • @yoboymoi
    @yoboymoi ปีที่แล้ว +51

    Gravedigger's Trap Hole is an awesome alternative if you're running a trap based deck

    • @drakevayer13
      @drakevayer13 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      True, 2000 burn dmg is really annoying eff. The only downside is that it doesn't destroy cards

    • @Gebirges
      @Gebirges ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Freaking busted card in a 8k format

    • @lance2304
      @lance2304 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@drakevayer13well against tearlaments and other like archetypes that's amazing

    • @CrnaStrela
      @CrnaStrela ปีที่แล้ว +6

      And because it is a "hole" trap card, it is something traptrix play religiously, fuck it they can even activate it from the hand.

    • @SomeNamelessNobody
      @SomeNamelessNobody ปีที่แล้ว +6

      ​@@CrnaStrelaTraptrix can also play it from the deck as well thanks to Rafflesia.

  • @samu0l095
    @samu0l095 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    Caled by at 2 is ok.

  • @zema9401
    @zema9401 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    "It deserves its hit in any format bc of how universally good the effect is"
    >Maxx C at 3 copies in OCG and MD

    • @clackman622
      @clackman622 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      WHY MOST PLAYERS QUIT. DUMB KONAMI

    • @GardeniaCreations
      @GardeniaCreations ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And the fact how every deck these days is a pile of generically good hand traps, because none of the traps but C are even touched by the banlist. 3 of Call wouldn't fix it, but it'd at least make "drawing the out" easier.

  • @vollied4865
    @vollied4865 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Needs to always be at 3 hand traps are rampant and out of control

    • @nsalieister3334
      @nsalieister3334 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You say this but called by at 3 just makes wombo combo decks much much better
      cuz now instead of needing 1-2 handtraps you need 3 to stop them in their tracks

    • @AsterDXZ
      @AsterDXZ ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Except they’re not and most decks printed nowadays are more than capable of playing through at least 1 handtrap.
      If your deck cannot do this, it sucks. Plain and simple.
      If this card were at 3, no handtrap would ever resolve, which may sound good to you, but would result in extremely long combo decks being played, which I don’t know about you, sounds miles worse to me than getting ash’d every now and again

    • @Endershock1678
      @Endershock1678 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nsalieister3334 I'm under the belief 3 is too strong and 1 is close but a bit too weak. I like 2 honestly.
      This means you'll rarely draw into both and be able to combo well, but still have to deal with at least 1 handtrap. Especially since most decks can play through a handtrap or sometimes two, but really struggle once the third one goes off.

  • @micha-elhorus5799
    @micha-elhorus5799 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I dont see a reason why called by the grave should be semilimited or limited but most handtraps are not

    • @1stCallipostle
      @1stCallipostle 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's too generically good.
      Your handtraps can only do their thing under certain conditions, but Called By can counter basically all of them with no thought

    • @micha-elhorus5799
      @micha-elhorus5799 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@1stCallipostle i can see It very good considering Is not Just vs handtraps, they should make a called by only for hantraps

    • @user-pz4tx7if9d
      @user-pz4tx7if9d 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@1stCallipostlefucking every handtrap universally good is the reason why it should be on 10

    • @1stCallipostle
      @1stCallipostle 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-pz4tx7if9d Half of them are literally worthless depending on the matchup

    • @jmurray1110
      @jmurray1110 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Probably because it doesn’t just hit hand traps it goes after every graveyard effect so can act as a hand trap itself to disrupt graveyard focused decks

  • @BpointShow
    @BpointShow ปีที่แล้ว +2

    if i'd have a penny for everytime I used Called By to Negate my oponents Ash Blossom just for me to forget it negates it for two turns and get a surprise pikachu face when I try to use my Ash during next turn...

  • @Randybroooo
    @Randybroooo ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Me who plays Superheavy Samurai and knowing I can't run and had to deal the card: *cries in the corner

    • @Renfrost_x_JetstreamRen38
      @Renfrost_x_JetstreamRen38 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I play a random ass LIGHT/dragon-type deck(trying to make a blue eyes deck). I feel your pain

  • @pinolyzerproductionsinc.1062
    @pinolyzerproductionsinc.1062 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Bring it back to 3

  • @ashikjaman1940
    @ashikjaman1940 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Chinook is a funny example to ise for handtraps lol

  • @user-pz4tx7if9d
    @user-pz4tx7if9d 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The reason that it’s anti-handtrap is the reason why it should be on 5

  • @jorionrange8336
    @jorionrange8336 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I also really just love the name and art work.

  • @toomuchsauce3389
    @toomuchsauce3389 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There’s been a couple of situations where I used called by to stop someone’s monsters effect that they have on the field by using called by to banish the same monster name they have in the graveyard
    It came in clutch I was even surprised by it

  • @maskedduelist1380
    @maskedduelist1380 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Infinite Impermanence would like to know your location

  • @edensaga_verse
    @edensaga_verse ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Called By to 3. Its the great equalizer for multiple hand traps. If your deck is halted by a single negate, then why not allow 3 of the out?

    • @zema9401
      @zema9401 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      People also play Crossout Designator as a "3rd Called By". So it evens out.

  • @PhantomHunter8122
    @PhantomHunter8122 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I wish called by was at 2 I love that card since I hate been hand trapped

    • @CG-_-SUMDUMFUK
      @CG-_-SUMDUMFUK ปีที่แล้ว

      I take it you don't play MD then right?

    • @PhantomHunter8122
      @PhantomHunter8122 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CG-_-SUMDUMFUK i do but I also play TCG and it's limited to 1

    • @CG-_-SUMDUMFUK
      @CG-_-SUMDUMFUK ปีที่แล้ว

      @@PhantomHunter8122 you could also just use cross out cause it kinda does the same thing

    • @d.structive2633
      @d.structive2633 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@CG-_-SUMDUMFUK Given you have the same hand trap in your deck...

    • @PhantomHunter8122
      @PhantomHunter8122 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CG-_-SUMDUMFUK if you have the same card because if not is useless

  • @dougwitus
    @dougwitus 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One thing I love is baiting this out with beacon saver just so I can pop alghoul mazera for a Zombie Vampire next turn

  • @mrplimbles7803
    @mrplimbles7803 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Back to 2! 1 deck can have 12 hand traps and still be viable. I want more than 1 anti hand trap card

    • @Renfrost_x_JetstreamRen38
      @Renfrost_x_JetstreamRen38 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah. Some cards being banned or limited to certain numbers just doesn't make sense. There are way more op cards that aren't banned or limited.

    • @bigmen0
      @bigmen0 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It should be at 0 with crossout. (alongside the obvious outliers like the roach in md, shifter, etc), the decks that fold to an ash blossom are either casual decks that this card doesn't help more than the other group: the degenerate combo decks that end on unbreakable boards or literal ftks. The tcg has a couple ftk combos legal at the moment, that see no actual play because of their weakness to common 1 for 1 handtraps, you do not want any cards that patch those weaknesses up existing. Does it suck that Snake Rain for Ogdoadic Venom Reptile pile also gets 4head-ed? Yes, but it's acceptable collateral damage, handtraps are the way we have interaction in yugioh nowadays with the current speed of the game. Also, for most tier 2 decks that aim to actually play yugioh, you can play around them too (going alternative combo lines like a negate before a must resolve search, or for Branded, the deck hit hardest by ash blossom, using the Nadir engine) instead of just drawing green card.

    • @mrplimbles7803
      @mrplimbles7803 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bigmen0 Hand trap Meta still be rampant, it needs to end

    • @morathehollow4797
      @morathehollow4797 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@bigmen0honestly the only handtrap i kinda disagree with is Shifter. Mainly cause your deck has to be specifically built around it, so its not something that can be slapped into every deck. (Unlike say, Maxx C). But i do get it, i have won plenty of games with Crystal Beasts through just activating D Shifter alone.

    • @Endershock1678
      @Endershock1678 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@bigmen0 I've won games due to Ash resolving against Branded, one of the best decks in the format lol.
      Don't get me wrong, most good decks can definitely play through and Ash or Veiler here, but for other decks, they are held back only by handtraps.

  • @voltingmaster5458
    @voltingmaster5458 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Though do be careful when using this card as the negated effects of the monster that was banished by this effect also apply to you too.

    • @user-qr5vh5vx6z
      @user-qr5vh5vx6z 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      someone please reply to this, i was versing a hero deck he went first, the first card activated the entire match was his poly, he uses poly for a fusion summon, i maxx c, he ash blossoms but i have called by the grave in my hand and it didn’t even give me the fucking option to activate it and he went on to get up DPE

  • @whenthemoneybusiness
    @whenthemoneybusiness ปีที่แล้ว +4

    finger

  • @jowe5065
    @jowe5065 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i think it's so much stronger going first though

  • @prosamis
    @prosamis ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Both explanations are for going first though

    • @neonoah3353
      @neonoah3353 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, but stopping handtraps can be done in both going 1st or 2nd.

    • @prosamis
      @prosamis ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@neonoah3353 true but that's mostly for going first. Handtraps are, usually, the least of your concern when you're going second, especially post board

    • @JPARnum1
      @JPARnum1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@prosamis that is literally the most common reason given for wanting to ban maxx c, but what if they drop maxx c on top of their full negate board.
      same with floodgates.

  • @lazydesmond8240
    @lazydesmond8240 ปีที่แล้ว

    There's lots of play against hand traps. I struggled to return to the meta until I realized thus fact

  • @rocketbun5413
    @rocketbun5413 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think it should be brought to three, just because of ash, droll, ghost belle etc. The fact that your searches can be stopped so easily is fine but having an answer to these hand traps should be more readily available in my opinion

  • @F0r3v3rT0m0rr0w
    @F0r3v3rT0m0rr0w 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    oh you haft to set it! ...

  • @nodeberiaestaraqui93
    @nodeberiaestaraqui93 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    OLEME EL DEDO: The card

  • @GamexHunter10
    @GamexHunter10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    With how many hand traps there are, called by should be at 3

    • @ensamvarg8504
      @ensamvarg8504 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      At that point it would counter many common strategies harder than the handtraps its apparently meant to stop. There is a reason it has gone down to 1

    • @tranquangthang8897
      @tranquangthang8897 ปีที่แล้ว

      Many but you have to consider how much would they be optimal on your hand and would they screw up your deck consistency if you only have 1 or 2 handtrap against a combo deck with 3 called by you're already lost if you open 3 4 handtrap with no starter you're also lose.

    • @d.structive2633
      @d.structive2633 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@ensamvarg8504The reason would be that Crossout Designator is more expensive. Hence why they're called "komoney".

  • @thewoollyviking5928
    @thewoollyviking5928 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nothing made me laugh harder than when I realized this card is basically kryptonite for any cyber dragon deck. Called By on OG Cyber Dragon and suddenly their entire deck has their effect negated.

    • @JPARnum1
      @JPARnum1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      wrong it only negates original name, though it would negate stuff like certain harpies, C39 utopia variants, NEX fusions.

  • @Yslohr
    @Yslohr ปีที่แล้ว

    No joke I still want called by at 3.

  • @dirtsquid6995
    @dirtsquid6995 ปีที่แล้ว

    If handtraps are so common, their out needs to be untouched to curb their power.

  • @thatasianwaiter4559
    @thatasianwaiter4559 ปีที่แล้ว

    Me that only run 3x imperm, 3x evenly match, and 3x dark ruler no more, going 2nd to break boards and then main phasing 2 to start my turn 😂😂😂

  • @khiemvu8510
    @khiemvu8510 ปีที่แล้ว

    Funny thing is, this card have been more universal use than you might think. If the opponent would activate a monster effect and have that same monster in the GY, you can chain CBTG to it to negate the effect. An additional use for it is when you go second, you can throw handtraps in and if the opponent respond with CBTG, it means the opponent cannot respond in your turn with the same handtrap, since CBTG negates all effect of cards with the same name until the end of the NEXT turn.

  • @elgringo1893
    @elgringo1893 ปีที่แล้ว

    Be doing droll and lock bird really dirty by including ghost belle twice instead

  • @omgIoIwtf
    @omgIoIwtf ปีที่แล้ว

    You forgot negating a normal/special summoned monster’s effect if another copy of that master rests in the gy.

  • @TobiasBroad
    @TobiasBroad ปีที่แล้ว

    I know what this card is used for, however I just never seem to have it in my hand at the correct time.

  • @Dratini4231
    @Dratini4231 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I actually think this card should be kept at 3 because of the mass amount of combo decks should be balanced with these kinda cards.

  • @blissisdeath7671
    @blissisdeath7671 ปีที่แล้ว

    The good ol days when it was at 3

  • @-.-David
    @-.-David ปีที่แล้ว

    Bro put ghost belle twice

  • @citrusjuicebox
    @citrusjuicebox 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Equating "universally good" and "bannable" doesn't make a lot of sense

  • @LeeFox1337
    @LeeFox1337 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I miss the long long ago when called by first came out and nobody played it. Because the game wasn't every deck needing a TKO or OTK to be viable.

  • @lordvika2526
    @lordvika2526 ปีที่แล้ว

    One thing you forgot to mention is that called by the grave can not be used during the damage step to stop effects like honest.
    Since it doesn't negate the activation of the card only the effect, and only things that be activated during damage step are cards that change attack or defense or cards that negate the activation of those effects.

    • @slenderman4788
      @slenderman4788 ปีที่แล้ว

      Even if it negated activation it couldn't be used in dmg step. Because it's not a monster.

    • @lordvika2526
      @lordvika2526 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@slenderman4788 wrong.
      The only thing that can be activated during damage step is something that changes attack values like honest or rush recklessly or something can can negate the activation of those cards.
      Since called by the grave only negates the effects of cards and not the activation it can't be used to stop cards in the damage step.

    • @slenderman4788
      @slenderman4788 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lordvika2526 Not "something" that can negate the activation, only monster effects, unless they also modify atk/def like the "forbidden" cards. For example, My Body as a Shield could not be used in the dmg step eventho it negates activation.
      Counter traps also work during dmg step regardless.

  • @totenkopf8814
    @totenkopf8814 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I feel like this card should be at 3 just because how annoying hand traps are

  • @rz7179
    @rz7179 ปีที่แล้ว

    when it comes to the ban list, CBTG should be at 2. Lots of decks can't function without certain monster effects going off in the graveyard or reviving monsters from the graveyards. Labrynth is one of those decks that pitch cards from their hand to set and activate their traps.

  • @kaijutraps
    @kaijutraps ปีที่แล้ว

    Still think it should be at 2 or none at all because it has the maxx c effect where it just feels unfair when youre opponent has it when its at 2 you actually play around it

  • @bazkervillerouge750
    @bazkervillerouge750 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This should be at 3.

  • @fluffyjofficial
    @fluffyjofficial ปีที่แล้ว

    *2 ghost belle*

  • @SuiseiAnimations
    @SuiseiAnimations ปีที่แล้ว

    Maxx c will never be banned in master duel at this point

  • @Gogofan240
    @Gogofan240 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tons of handtraps and only one called by the grave. I find it dumb that this card is limited while the sea of handtraps just keeps getting bigger.

  • @LizardKingPerseus
    @LizardKingPerseus ปีที่แล้ว

    with how many hand traps there are running rampant called by shoulder at least be at 2

  • @yousifalali1232
    @yousifalali1232 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not to mention it’s not “once per turn”

  • @Ragnarok540
    @Ragnarok540 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This card is: how dare the opponent try to interact personified. I think that this is the next card that should get banned after maxx c gets banned in MD.

  • @ODDiSEE_
    @ODDiSEE_ ปีที่แล้ว

    Tear format would have been a bit less oppressive with called by at 2 or 3.

  • @mrdude88
    @mrdude88 ปีที่แล้ว

    It’s a shame a card like this is limited because of today’s format and meta cards. Instead of limited Ash Blossom and other hand traps, this card gets hit hard. Like seriously, if every hand trap is limited to 1, this card will still see play because it can remove cards from the GY like DD Crow, but might see slightly less play because hand trap are less consistent. And if Konami stops making every card have GY effect, this card will see very little play. This is one of those card that very few duelist will play during caveman Yugioh era.

  • @dragonfiregaming3186
    @dragonfiregaming3186 ปีที่แล้ว

    Still want call by the grave at 2 in TCG man. Theirs soo man decks that pop off and soo many hand traps i feel like putting the card to two would help soo much

  • @netosaldivar
    @netosaldivar ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It should be at 3…

  • @chops1162
    @chops1162 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I still think it's kind of dumb for called by to be limited because if you play there you can brick on them

  • @ryanking6105
    @ryanking6105 ปีที่แล้ว

    The fact that a counter to all the bullshit like Ash Blossom is banned while Ash and all the others it can counter aren’t, just goes to show why modern yugioh is to big a headache to try to get into again.

  • @Arukea
    @Arukea 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Free my nigga called by

  • @jmurray1110
    @jmurray1110 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is it bad I only just noticed it’s an old man in the card
    My brain keeps making me see a blond woman

  • @jcplays5831
    @jcplays5831 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Call by the grave, and ash blossom for that matter, isn’t a card I actively hate because unlike a certain other card *cough cough maxx c* it’s a slight hindrance to your main turn instead of actively giving the opponent the most ludicrous card advantage possible

  • @KnightlyBrosGaming
    @KnightlyBrosGaming ปีที่แล้ว

    I hope for the day TCG brings it back to 2. Screw all these damn hand traps! They should be the ones getting limited!

  • @krymzonsix5970
    @krymzonsix5970 ปีที่แล้ว

    The only reason why I don’t usually run called by is it’s limited to 1. Don’t get me wrong It is really good against hand traps but I’d rather put in a card that will have more value like for engine/ extender. I personally prefer talents over called by.

  • @ButFirstHeLitItOnFire
    @ButFirstHeLitItOnFire ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This gives me an idea for a new kind of card:
    _Refused By The Grave_
    Quick play spell
    _Target 1 card in the GY: All cards in the GY with the same name as the target are either added to owners hands or shuffled into their owners decks (owners choice). Until the end phase of next turn, all cards with the same name as the target are, if they would be sent to the GY, instead either added to their owners hand or shuffled into the deck or extra deck (Owners choice). You can only activate 1 “Refused By The Grave” per duel._

    • @skiffy8121
      @skiffy8121 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      bad idea. one sentence. non opt special summons from hand

    • @ButFirstHeLitItOnFire
      @ButFirstHeLitItOnFire ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@skiffy8121
      Fine, let me try THIS then:
      _Refused By The Grave_
      Quick play spell
      _Target 1 card in the GY: All cards in the GY with the same name as the target are shuffled into their owners decks. Until the end phase of next turn, all cards with the same name as the target are, if they would be sent to the GY, instead shuffled into their owners deck. You can only activate 1 “Refused By The Grave” per turn._
      Better?

    • @skiffy8121
      @skiffy8121 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ButFirstHeLitItOnFire yes. absolutely.

    • @ButFirstHeLitItOnFire
      @ButFirstHeLitItOnFire ปีที่แล้ว

      @@skiffy8121
      Yeah, I feel like this would be a good counter to graveyard reliant cards, or a nifty way to recycle your own assets back into your deck.

    • @skiffy8121
      @skiffy8121 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ButFirstHeLitItOnFire ye it seems like a fun retrain

  • @maracabo1176
    @maracabo1176 ปีที่แล้ว

    The fact that yugioh is so Hand Trap heavy means that i hate you can only play one, i think the OCG has the right idea by putting it at 2

  • @Rieras
    @Rieras ปีที่แล้ว

    uncencored hand

  • @nintendofan1242
    @nintendofan1242 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wait... TWO TURNS?????

    • @kratosgow342
      @kratosgow342 ปีที่แล้ว

      yeah basically both the turn that person using and the opponent turn

  • @tommycruz7544
    @tommycruz7544 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How hand trap heavy this current format is… it’s should be back at 3 in both ocg and tcg

  • @EinSilverRose
    @EinSilverRose ปีที่แล้ว

    Only reason it's limited in TCG is becase TCG made it a common.

  • @MrIcenice44
    @MrIcenice44 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why is it limited 2 in the ocg? Is the power level higher?

  • @TusslinTom2.0
    @TusslinTom2.0 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wish it was at 2 when we got 3 ash blossoms hell even the OCG has it right to have it 2

    • @slenderman4788
      @slenderman4788 ปีที่แล้ว

      They have Maxx C legal, which alone is an issue so big that it makes cbtg at 2 "fine". If your deck dies to ash, it sucks, sorry.

    • @TusslinTom2.0
      @TusslinTom2.0 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@slenderman4788 🤓 all right nerd tell me a deck that doesn’t die to Ash

  • @Dj_equinox
    @Dj_equinox ปีที่แล้ว

    it does not deserve to be on the banlist because the hand traps dominate the meta game it's either you get ashed hit with effect veiler etc etc, it's annoying. called by gives people a chance to actually counter hand traps yet every time there is a counter to hand traps it gets hit instantly on the banlist

  • @EthanGrace938
    @EthanGrace938 ปีที่แล้ว

    Then start hitting hand traps komoney

  • @StupidWeb
    @StupidWeb ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I just wish it was at 2 in the TCG as well. Having to draw the 1-of makes it feel so sacky

  • @wizard5351
    @wizard5351 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why do i set call by the grave when i can just use it from hand?

    • @megaspacewaffles
      @megaspacewaffles 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can use it on your opponent’s turn if you set it

  • @rouka24151
    @rouka24151 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hot take, i feel like called by should get unlimited. Just because it isn't searchable and there is like a billion handtrap in the game.

  • @sirninjaraiden
    @sirninjaraiden ปีที่แล้ว

    Why would they touch this card at all? Should have left it at 3.

  • @drewbabe
    @drewbabe ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Honestly I'm gonna say it. It doesn't deserve any hits. It doesn't win games on its own. It doesn't do jack on its own. It requires your opponent to do something. Waking the Dragon or Witch's Strike can be game-winning if you resolve them but they requires your opponent to do something first, why does this card with its meager effect of stopping a single hand trap or single GY effect get limited/semi-limited? Back to 3. Now.

    • @Endershock1678
      @Endershock1678 ปีที่แล้ว

      We don't need going first to be any better than it already is.

  • @Andresvf08
    @Andresvf08 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It should be semi-limited

  • @lukasunterwaditzer3141
    @lukasunterwaditzer3141 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think it should be baned or at 3. Because if it is at 1 nobody playes around it and it becomes more unfair than it would be at 3. At 3 you know that your oppnent could have it and so you can play around it

  • @wallisbudge4022
    @wallisbudge4022 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why do people even hate hand traps? Would you rather sit there doing nothing while your opponent completes their first-turn-kill combo without issue every single time you duel?

  • @madeinmeme9688
    @madeinmeme9688 ปีที่แล้ว

    This card should be at 3

  • @tefnutofhoney2832
    @tefnutofhoney2832 ปีที่แล้ว

    Honestly, because its limited, all the toxic hand traps that made it need to exist should be too.
    They have lead to so many non games, where i cant play because im being countered, and they cant play because they devoted half their deck to counters.

    • @slenderman4788
      @slenderman4788 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      "Oh no, my shitty rogue deck dies to an ash, ban it! Toxic!"

  • @Goku-zu3rk
    @Goku-zu3rk ปีที่แล้ว

    Sometimes it doesnt trigger. Why?

  • @noahcharles2571
    @noahcharles2571 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Funny part is that so many decks are trying to stop monster effects they forget to have defense against trap floodgates a couple of my favorite traps to use is traps like rainbow life Thunder of ruler threatening roar and a few more because this card essentially make your whole turn useless there are ironically also the best ways to deal with god cards activate them at the start of your opponents turn and watch them rage as they are helpless to do anything as you keep canceling their turn 😂😂😂

  • @one_for_one
    @one_for_one ปีที่แล้ว

    Nah, called by at 3. If we're gunna have this saturation of graveyard effects in concert with milling being as efficient as it is, the format deserves more GY hate. And called by is p well balanced all things considered imo

  • @user-qr5vh5vx6z
    @user-qr5vh5vx6z 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    someone please reply to this, i was versing a hero deck he went first, the first card activated the entire match was his poly, he uses poly for a fusion summon, i maxx c, he ash blossoms but i have called by the grave in my hand and it didn’t even give me the fucking option to activate it and he went on to get up DPE

  • @Mal-Function4
    @Mal-Function4 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    isn't crossout designator a little better (less versatile but more consistent because it's not limited) than called?

  • @1stCallipostle
    @1stCallipostle 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I outright refuse to run Called By.
    It's so generic and so cheap that it single handedly erases any identity your deck would have

  • @DeadmanPauli
    @DeadmanPauli ปีที่แล้ว

    For me its still dumb that it got nerved to 1 in the tcg
    2 or 3 would be much better

  • @le_Wurst
    @le_Wurst 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pls @2 in tcg ❤

  • @zepherscotty
    @zepherscotty ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I absolutely hate hand traps. I think they ruined the game in many ways. CBTG is a card I consider to be a necessary evil to play current Yu-Gi-Oh.

  • @balelynx1918
    @balelynx1918 ปีที่แล้ว

    Also Fenrir is good goind first and second. (?)

  • @blaze3422160
    @blaze3422160 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Called By is an example of good card design. Cards that are good to use going first or second so you don’t have to debate on whether it’s a dead card after game 1.

  • @Keizrel
    @Keizrel ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We need 3 Called in Master Duel

  • @Darien2016
    @Darien2016 ปีที่แล้ว

    Eh I still feel like they should bring it back to 3.

  • @f.b.iagent3971
    @f.b.iagent3971 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like how Crossout Designator counters hand traps in a more proactive way as you actually need a sense of awareness to either common hand traps in the meta or hand traps that actually impact you heavily to play the card, it’s got a much healthier interaction too
    No one likes being hand trapped, but I do think that Called by is a little too easy to get value out of
    I just wish crossout were cheaper in TCG cause £17 per copy is absurd for a 3 of staple

    • @d.structive2633
      @d.structive2633 ปีที่แล้ว

      Congrats, you figured out why they're called "komoney".