Fun Fact: The real difference between a muffin and a cupcake isn't whether or not it has icing, but what batter is used to make them. Therefore, a muffin with icing is still a muffin, and a cupcake without icing is still a cupcake.
"Is a frog a fish?" obviously not, they're amphibians, but we spent the entire class period arguing anyway. the worst thing about this though? The two sides of the argument were the entire class vs. the teacher. the Teacher thought a frog was a fish.
My class had almost the exact same argument except the teacher thought frogs were reptiles. He bet us a bot of donuts that he was right and researched it when he got home. He arrived next class with donuts.
The dumbest argument I've gotten into was when i brought up that "Is the word Grinch his name, job or ethnicity?" Tweet to my brother Anyway it got pretty heated so we asked my mom for her opinion and she just said "it's his name, his full name is Elias P. Grinch" Then my brother left the room and i was like "wait is that really his full name???" And she said, completely stone-faced "what? No, I just made that up."
Actually, that's not too far from the truth. Okay, not really, but apparently Suess said at some point that his name was to be Godwin Grinch, but he shortened it as his character design developed to its more "uncouth" state. He actually did have a full name, at least at the earlier stages of his design. Okay, in hindsight, might have had one too many Dr. Seuss documentaries on my part. Neat tidbit though.
Yeah…me and my friend had an argument over text about it All for One was technically the first One for All user in My Hero Academia. It was a very stupid tbh.
He definitely thinks, whether or not he projects his thoughts on jon's mind or if jon is specifically a cat mind reader is not clear I think the 2nd is more probable since the dog who i forgot the name doesn't respect garfield's desire, jon could not be a general mind reader cause he cannot read the mind of another humans and i think his interactions with the dog are less accurate
Garfield thinks. Jon doesnt communicate Garfield directly like he would with a person normally, he just assumes what is Garfield thinking because of his owner-pet bonding.
Interesting. I work with lifting equipment that is painted in that color and I think there should be a specific name for it if there isnt one already. Edit: according to google its fluorescent yellow.
they wouldn't. unless mermaids are humans who have evolved and there is remnants of a knee left over (i believe something similar can be found in some whales) then its just a tail and tails don't have knees. its like saying a fish has knees. just sounds wrong lmao
a 3 hour fierce debate about pasta shapes with my italian roomate that ended with "if u call it noodles one more time I'll throw ur tamagatchi in the toilet" before they slamed their door and started blasting italian music.
Got into an argument with someone in girl scouts over whether the US had 50 or 52 states. She was convinced Hawaii and Alaska made it 52, as in, there are 50 landlocked states AND THEN Hawaii and Alaska. I dropped out of the scouts soon after
@@Lordmewtwo151 There's a movement to get the upper peninsula of Michigan to become its own state; were this to happen, the new state would be named Superior.
I once got in a legitimate shouting match with a friend of mine about whether death is an activity, and every so often the argument comes up again and ends up in a shouting match again. We're both archaeologists.
@@comradewindowsill4253 That's why we were talking about death as activity in the first place: arguing over whether the presence of a corpse is proof of human activity on a prehistoric site.
@@lucyhartwell2134 Those are two very different questions. The first one is asking if death is an activity, the other one if a corpse proves human activity. "Activity" =/= "human activity". That's an english problem. Switch you argument in latin. Activity becomes "actio", and human activity becomes "humana operatio." You guys just happen to speak english. = Let's start by defining our shit: Human activity means there are humans. An activity is something you do to get out of the house and fight boredom. = Second question, does a corpse proves human activity on a prehistoric site ? Yes, of course. First question, is death an activity ? Of course not.
I mean, dying is something you can do, so...I'd say it's an activity. Laying there. Dying. It definitely eats up your schedule and doesn't leave much room for other activities does it?
I once argued that pineapples are more dangerous then watermelons because of the spikes. My friend replied that the watermelon was more dangerous because of the mass. So we decided to take some research, we did a total of 4 tests, each test, The watermelon ended up winning, We had 5 pages of research and results. My friend won, and I gave her 2 dollars and a Snickers bar. Edit: My friend has read your comments, and she saw how people think Durian is a good contender, so we will redo our tests, and will report back on our results. Edit 2: Durian won, fellas
I was at school when they turned on the Large Hadron Collider for the first time. A girl told me she wasn't worried about the black hole because it was microscopic, so she wouldn't fit into it. I had the weird experience of having to concede to her that the LHC wasn't dangerous, but also that this was the wrong reason not to be worried about black holes.
I spent a good 3 hours debating with my friends on discord about what the best mode of transportation would be in a zombie apocalypse and we went very in depth with it as well
Bicycles: Quiet. Dont need fuel. Fast enough to escape a horde. Compact enough to squeeze through roads clogged with cars and you might even be able to zip through a small crowd. And you can store some loot on it if you have bags. If you are really skilled, you can even parkour with a mountainbike. Ive seen bicycle cops ride off stairs like it was nothing.
i once got into a debate with my father about what constituted a sport. he eventually ended up backing himself into a corner and claiming that war is the only sport.
FUN FACT the importance of the person does not define whether it's an assassination, it's whether or not the murder was politically motivated. only politically motivated murder can be called an assassination
A stupid argument me and my friends got into was whether or not vegan ice cream was real ice cream They created an entirely new groupchat because of it
Interesting. It depends on wether the word cream is to be taken litterally. In the Netherlands we just call icecream "ice". But "roomijs" (cream ice) is made with milk and theres also water based icecream.
At least, in the US, the answer is objectively no. The FDA has defined that ice cream is required to have a certain percentage of milk fats. (And if it's frozen custard, also egg yolks) So no, in the US, vegan ice cream is not actually ice cream, but is instead a 'frozen desert'.
My sister and I had an hours long argument that ended in her crying over whether humans technically count as straws because of our digestive tracts. We were both already adults by that point.
Me and my friend have been arguing for 3+ years on whether or not triangles do and can have feelings. We've made presentations which we presented to each other, but she is not ready to admit she's wrong, yet.
Seriously as an autistic asexual who loves complementing people and has trouble differentiating platonic and romantic connection do you have a good answer?
@@NotThisAnonymous Well, you may give the word a dictionary definition, such as "sexual behavior that suggests interest in the other person, genuine or playful", but people are still gonna disagree on what actually constitutes flirting. To some, it can be a simple "hello" or an interested look, while others would only realize that someone's flirting with them if they literally grab them by the crotch lol.
I had an argument in kindergarten about which direction was left and which one was right. We were sitting on opposite sides of the table and didn't understand "my left vs your left"
Once had an argument with a friend about whether the Coriolis Effect would curve a bullet left or right After 15 minutes we realized we were both arguing the same side but were so bad at articulating our points that we thought we were arguing
I am imagining a hilarious situation where you were both right, or and even funnier situation where, as you were both in kindergarten, you were both wrong.
When I was in preschool, I remember a kid arguing about how I was 3 years old at the time. I was 4. It was basically just going back and forth at this point. I don’t remember what happened at the end, but whenever I think about it I suddenly get a thought that I screamed “I’M 4” at some point. I also got into an argument with a teacher in first grade once, and the argument was about a story we were reading at the time involving a bird getting injured, and I was arguing that the bird got its leg cut off. I ended up having that same argument with my mom that night.
Once had an entire family debate over dinner that turned into a screaming match because we couldn't figure out whether you drown or suffocate in *milk* It only ended because the fridge just randomly spat out an ice cube and the entire table went silent. We didn't speak again for the entire meal.
Not a single one of your family members realized that "suffocate" and "drown" are synonyms when used in relation to liquids as the air-supply blockage? Suffocation is the lack of air due to obstruction, while drowning is a specific type of suffocation wherein the obstruction is liquid.
good god, that entire argument about the pots and pans made me laugh so hard, especially "if you can't boil an egg in it, then it's not a pot, you jackass!"
My friends and I once had a very heated argument during a school lunch hour about the differences between hitting/stabbing/slashing/cutting someone. Our teachers looked very concerned.
A girl in my high school was arguing with me about what colour my own hair was. She thought she knew my hair colour better than me. On a different note, one time I got into a different argument with a different girl involving the colour of the purple mirror in her locker. Knowing that it was purple, I said it was pink. She said it was purple. Repeat saying this back and forth like this a few times, and I suddenly switch my stance to say "It's purple", which caused her to start incorrectly saying that it was pink without noticing for a good 2 seconds. She got a little aggressive after she realized. I know it sounds like I'm making this up, but I swear it happened, I have vivid memories of it.
We were in kindergarten or preschool. We both were very convinced we knew right from left and got into such a shouting match that her mom came over. Technically we were both correct--we just didn't understand that one person's right and left aren't on the same sides as the other person's _when you're facing each other._
I just fell out of my chair after reading this, sounds like something I would do. But not only in kindergarten or preschool. I most likely still do it to this day, my brain isn't braining. ;)
Omg the same argument happened to me! We were so mad that we ended up breaking up our friendship. (We were in kindergarten, when people said “I’m not going to be your friend anymore” all the time) Then a teacher came over and showed us that my right looks left to the person standing in front of me. We were confused at first, then we spun around testing how our left and right changes when it’s mirrored, and we ended up laughing because we were both stupid.
My friend and I once had a debate about what's the difference between being able to mimic something and copy something We were discussing this as though it was Kirby abilities
Dumbest but also most fun was in jazz band. It lasted the entire hour and a half class and ended in three of my classmates planking while watching a movie. It was the classic “Is water wet?” debate, plus a few others such as “Is fire hot?” and “Is air dry?” We spent the entire class arguing, searching definitions of words like “wet” and “soaked” and had to legitimately stop and decide whether milk is a liquid. Funniest part? It was the class against our band director
I remember one time I was watching Markiplier's Until Dawn gameplay with my brother and I heard the sound of a bird flying and I said it was a pigeon (because pigeons make a 'whistling' sound when they flap their wings) but he said it was a crow and we started yelling at each other (it was 3 AM) until I went to sleep in frustration. The next day we rewatched the video and discovered it was an eagle.
A friend and I got into an argument over if penguins are birds. Their argument was that, because penguins don't fly, they don't count as birds. I asked them what a penguin is if it isn't a bird, and they replied "whatever it is, it isn't a bird". We were seniors in high school.
I love the utter contempt matt has for that argument about the dress. The stupidest argument I have ever had is probably all the agruments I have had with my mum about whether various clothing items and blankets are green. She thinks i am colour blind, i think she is overly generous in what things are green
Yeah people who call teal/turqoise stuff green really baffle me. Same with calling red stuff orange when it's even like, _slightly_ orange. Like thas red motherfucker
@@marchadow3957 No. Sorry (haha) :) The term word "Stupid" means to 'show a *great lack* of intelligence or common sense' - oxford dictionary. Notice the words great and lack. These imply there is a measurable quantity of something. Since it refers to intelligence/common sense, it implies there is a measurable quantity of intelligence, and since lack means 'not available or in short supply' (oxford), it very really means having a 'big part (great) without', meaning that there would or would've been the ability or attribute of intelligence/common sense in the first place, in order to have 'great lack'. If 'Stupid' meant lacking the ability to be smart, then it would say 'complete lack' or 'total lack' or the likes. Even the word 'lacking' in it's various contexts implies there's or was a measureable substance of the initial term to begin with, this being intelligence or common sense. But, due to it saying great lack, we must concur that your statement is wrong. :D
Jacuzzi* Guinea* Banged* Know* what I hit my head on (Specification is a common requirement.)* Sorry to be a grammar bot, but I get really pissed off when I notice someone make a mistake in their sentences.
please do another part to this we need more also watched this video with my mates then proceeded to get into an argument about who would win in a fight between an ant in a human body or a velociraptor in a human body (they would each have the same attributes their respective species has)
But... it's a search engine... that would be like citing the local library as your source instead of the books/articles you read in that library. Or maybe even more accurately citing the index of said library
the last question is somewhat simple, a wok is a section of a sphere and a pan is a cylinder with rounded off edges, the pan always has a flat surface that tapers of at the ends around an inch or 2
My friend and I once had an impassioned late-night argument about how many states I would have been to when I came back from a long trip. She said that "states" was a term exclusive to the US, so I couldn't count other countries. It got to the point where we were shouting at each other about the Department of State and various uses of the word, while our other friend just watched bemusedly.
@epictoast I don’t think so. Her spell was specifically aimed at all existing animus dragons. So if they were not hatched, the spell would still apply because they existed when the spell was cast. But they can still have the gene to pass on to future generations and new animus dragons and still hatch because she never said anything about new animus dragons.
If someone was able to get all the shards together would animus magic be restored? When jeraboa placed the spell she only said when the item is broken. So if it was put together would it be fixed? What would work to fix it? Glue, flamesilk or something else? My opinion is that it would bring back animus magic but you couldn't use a normal item like glue/tape and if you were trying to put it back together you would need an icewing gift.
I vaguely remember about a year or so ago I got into a heated argument with my mom about “if you bake cookies and cook bacon, why are they named that way”. I ended up yelling “why don’t I just call cookies bakies then, and bacon cookon?” and my mom left the room immediately.
"Whether Mike Tyson could beat a silverback gorilla" which escalated to, "Well what if the gorilla had his hands tied behind his back?" The whole school, including the gym coach that could box, was in on it...
I had a year long argument with one of my friends in school if Narwhals were real or not, I ended up putting papers for the entire school to vote on: "Are Narwhal real? YES or NO" my overwhelming victory wasn't enough to convince her, nor did the natural geographic documentaries, "they could be CGI" she said "they could be costumes with two people inside, like those horse ones" she exclaimed "they could be robots like those tiny fish toys that swim in pools" she proclaimed! This was hell, WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD THEY MAKE A DOCUMENTARY ABOUT A FAKE ANIMAL!?!? Either way after one of the longest years of my life and some of the dumbest points in the world, made by both parties, I finally convinced her. But she still gives me the death stare every time they are mentioned, I'm convinced that after 6 months she was just disagreeing with me out of pure spite.
One time when I was a little kid, my dad and I got into an argument over whether a bug we saw outside was a bee or a wasp. He said he would show me a picture and explain the difference and I simply responded with "I KNOW WHAT I SAW."
Well in general, smooth bees are wasps, fuzzy wasps are bees, and if it doesn’t have wings it’s probably an ant. And also like Kevser said, wasps are mostly carnivorous while you won’t get a bee trying to eat other insects.
I remember getting into a fight with my friends on if they would be able to beat an angry gorilla in an MMA match if you got ample prep time, and a shotgun. They said no.
Fun Fact: These kinds of arguments are exactly why the Guiness Book of World Records was created The 2 creators were having an argument about something dumb, and realized 'it would be amazing if there was a book that kept track of stuff like this'
@/hvtrs8%2F-wuw%2Cymuvu%60e%2Ccmm-cjalngl-UAaEcf8FvReLsrEPq%3AI%409WpC I thought it was weird the two names were the same. It just means i'm too stupid to make the connection.
My entire physics class (me included) once got into an argument about whether the shaker cheese in pizza parlors was a powder or not. It was pretty much the whole class saying it was a powder against this one very persuasive guy who said it was "shredded." Let me tell you, I'm not lying when I say this shit got INTENSE. We were citing sources, at one point I pulled out a CHEESE PHASE DIAGRAM (don't ask), We were doing dramatic readings of rheology textbooks, someone found an article on the shear modulus of cheese types, and someone else even cited some guy on Quora named Ilgaz Soykal (yes we are all massive fucking nerds). We were arguing about this for the WHOLE CLASS (it was a substitute teacher, and the class didn't have many lectures anyway). After class, someone ended up asking the chemistry teacher, and she said it was a powder, so tAKE THAT, DAVE. To this day, mentioning cheese around any of those people triggers a fight-or-flight response.
4:19 Einstien could literally make a nuclear power plant from scraps for an indefinite source of electricity. It's like playing Conflux in heroes of might & magic 3; early on they suck but they're op late game.
@@a-mae-zing-mae8541 If you search for MIL-C-44072C you should find it And it's that long because it establishes shipping, defects and scientific standards for the ingredients
Throughout the last few years of my secondary school two girls had a famous and genuinely passionate years long argument about whether if you cut a sandwich in half you now have two sandwiches or one sandwich in two halves. People would randomly bring up he topic when they were both in the room and enjoy the fallout
It’s kinda like breaking a cookie in half isn’t it. They’re two sandwiches but they used to make up one whole one. Either answer isn’t necessary wrong. It’s all based on your perspective.
I jokingly mentioned to some friends that I could spend an hour arguing over who would win in a fight between Mr Incredible and Darth Vader. This evolved into an actual 90 minute analysis between a few of us.
One time I got into a 10 minute argument over if "Burger quesadilla" or "Quesadilla burger" would be the grammatically correct name for a quesadilla with a patty and cheese
Me and my friends got into an argument over wether or not it was appropriate for me to say “deez nuts” right before everyone were going to sleep, and it somehow escalated into being about Napoleon’s invasion of The Netherlands. It sounds extremely random but somehow it actually happened.
@@raven.petrichor I sent my friends a bunch of messages that made it appear as if I was going to say something important, but I was actually prancing them as my line of messages ended with deez nutz. These sort of pranks where quite common within our group, and some of us where getting tired of them and felt it was time for us to stop it with these pranks. Not everyone agreed however, and so we began arguing. After some time, one of the arguers said he felt like we were disrespecting and undermining him and so he asked “DO YOU ANY OF YOU IDIOTS EVEN KNOW WHAT THE NETHERLANDS WERE CALLED DURING NAPOLEONIC TIMES?!” as he feels smarter than us because of his knowledge of history. One guy googled the answer, and the guy who shouted said it was wrong. From there onwards, the heated discussion was about Napoleon, and nothing else
@@tacolordc No one disrespects the United Provinces...Unless you're Napoleon, in that case you put your brother on the throne and call it the FUCKING BATAVIAN REPUBLIC I can see why you argued about it though, The Dutch Republics have changed names, emperors, titles and geographic position what feels like every decade for 400-500 years
my sister and dad once got into the hugest fucking argument about who got to cut the pineapple we were gonna eat, it escalated so far that my dad ended up hiding the pineapple and my sister pushed a chair over so hard it left a gash in the floor (the story ended with my dad sneaking me the whole pineapple before I left for uni again, so I actually gained something from the argument lol)
The pot / pan arguments is absolutely hilarious to me because it reminds me of an argument a streamer got into with his chat about whether or not there are actually pots in Breath of The Wild (the cooking pots are based on woks but without a handle, so they look like giant stone bowls over a campfire). The argument never went anywhere, and eventually devolved into chat and the streamer deciding that bread is soup, and it's still one of the most hilarious clips I've ever seen in my whole life.
@@EllpaFox47ok SOOOO The cube rule of food is a crude way of identifying what a food it based on starch content. Here are the classifications: No starch: Soup 1 side: Toast 2 sides: Sandwich 3 sides: Taco 4 sides: Roll 5 sides: Bread bowl 6 sides: Calzone 2 or more layers: Cake Filled Cube: Bread Hope this clears things up :)
@@TheBillyBoi123 Wouldn't that make bread a calzone? because its always all bread and completely enclosed by bread on all sides? How did they come to the conclusion of soup?
Dumbest argument I’ve had: Mother and I arguing over if your spouse was always your best friend. Mom said yes, I said no. I asked my dad and my married brother who their best friends were, both said their male best friends. This led to my mom ignoring us for the rest of the day and giving my dad the cold shoulder.
To answer the beginning, 127 hours is a true story. He left his arm there until professionals could remove the rock and they properly disposed the arm.
Had an argument that lasted for weeks with my friends about how dolphins would get around on land if they could survive out of water. I said they would log roll, one of my friends insisted they would ride scooters, and another genuinely said they would just levitate.
The problem with most cetaceans (at least the big ones) is that they rely on being in water to support their bodies. Beach a big whale and the main cause of death will be that it was crushed by it’s own body weight. I’m not sure if this applies to “smaller” dolphins such as the bottlenose, spinner, or Commerson’s dolphin- but it does apply to the larger ones like orcas. I do think moisterization could be a factor too, but I’m not sure of that either.
I was thinking of how the hell would a dolphin riding a scooter be rational LOL but then I realized was your friend just thinking about Dr. Blowhole from the Penguins of Madagascar TV series???
Dumbest arguement ive ever been in was with my brother about an imaginary stick. We got into a first fight about whose it was. Our mom had to take the IMAGINARY stick
me and my cousin had a similar thing happen except instead of an imaginary stick it was just a regular stick that was shoved into a bbq package. we fought over it for 3 hours in the middle of the woods. still have the stick
@@germaxicus6670 my cousin only visits me in summer or chrostmas cause he lives really far so its mostly mine but he tried to steal it every time hes here
"If you listen to audiobook can you say you've read the book" is actually relatable as hell. Audio is the best way I process information since I was a kid. I had a LOT new books this year and most of them were in audio format and some told me it doesn't count
a few days ago, we had a day at my school where everyone had to come dressed up. about eight people came together and decided they would all dress as jesus. when all of my friends saw them walk past, it devolved into a massive screaming argument about if the plural of jesus is jesuses or jesi.
@@sylvanticxI mean, this would be wrong, since -ae is the feminine plural of 1st declension nouns in Latin, while the name Jesus is a masculine 2nd declension noun in Latin. Therefore, Jesi is technically the correct answer in Latin. In English though, I'd argue Jesuses.
@@ashwinnmyburgh9364 Jesus didn't speak Latin. He likely spoke Aramaic. I don't know Aramaic, nor do I know much about Aramaic, but best I can figure out with some googling is that Jesus would have likely pluraled himself as "Yeshe" (ישוע). In Hebrew, this would be something like Y'shu'im (I also don't speak Hebrew, but I know a little from 7 years of Hebrew school and a lot of time in synagogue) (ישועים maybe, but that looks wrong, and I've never been good at spelling in Hebrew, so maybe it's ישוים without the ayin). I'm pretty sure Jesus was supposed to be learned or something, so he might have spoken Hebrew. I don't know why I'm arguing about this, I'm not even Christian.
If -i or -s is used has nothing to with the spelling of the word, that's a "correlation does not imply causation" thing: the difference is if the word has a Greek or Latin origin. The Greeks pluralised with -i, so words with Greek origins still do, while the Latins used -s, -m, -a, or -um, which we've simplified to just the first. Also, English defaults to -s if it's from some other language, a trait we got from French. Keep in mind it gets a bit tricky if the word started out as Greek but became a Latin word by assimilation. For example, we don't say "Phobi" because we don't say "Phobos". "Phobia" is a Latin word, so we're using a middle step. Octopus connects directly to the Greek "oktōpous", with no Latin mid-step. Thus, Octopi. QED, "Jesus" would pluralise as Jesuses, because it is from the Latin "Iēsous".
My Dad used to lead my local Beavers (the level before Cubscouts) group. At some point an argument developed between some of the kids and my Dad, over whether they could run faster than a kicked football. This resulted in my Dad bringing a ball, us all going outside, him kicking it, and us trying to beat it to the end of the field. This was intended to prove his point once and for all, but became a semi-regular activity because everyone wanted another go. I'll repeat that: some 5 to 8 year olds thought they could run faster than 60mph (the rough average speed of a kicked football), they raced against a ball doing about 65 mph, and they then kept trying this almost weekly afterwards. Strangely enough, the football won.
@twinostrich8045 so what's the secret to this new generation of record breaking sprinters in the Olympics? "Me da made us race a footy when we were kids cos carl said he could beat it". Fascinating! Genius!
all of these question either involve concepts we made up and so have no correct answer, or do have a correct answer that can be easily verified within seconds
The stupidest argument I've ever had was on whether two lasagnas stacked on top of each other were two lasagnas or one big lasagna. I don't even remember what my stance was.
I'd say the way it came out of the oven constitutes one lasagna. Stacking two pieces does not make it one. Although, I absolutely love the thought of tall lasagna.
There was an argument on my bus in high school if water was wet or if it *made* things wet. A war almost broke out and we unintentionally split ourselves across both sides of the bus Oh and it lasted like 2 weeks
Well, it's easy: If water makes things that it touches wet, it therefore must be wet because surface tension decrees that water is always in contact with more water, therefore water is always wet.
I once had a HEATED all-caps argument with my friend on how to spell croissant. She INSISTED it was spelled “cwossa” and/ or “cwoassant”. The argument came to a close when she got distracted by a photo of Mr. Clean someone else in the group chat sent because she thought it looked like her former math teacher.
Once when I was a kid, I asked my mom to take a picture of me. She said yes, but on her way to get the camera, her partner at the time who I'll call Rick was like "HOW WERE YOU SO EASILY PERSUADED BY A KID!?" as though taking a couple of pictures was somehow harmful. The argument escalated to the point where Rick punched a hole in the wall, somehow taking out a light switch in the process. Meanwhile I was sitting there posing and waiting.
The most heated up argument I've been in was "what was first the chicken or the egg". It happened during 2nd year of uni in the kitchen of a shared house of 4 people. It ended when everyone stormed off of the kitchen swearing and calling each other names and retreating to our respective rooms so we could cool down. We didn't talk to the guys on the otherside of the argument for a couple of weeks. 10/10
The answer is objectively the egg, there were millions of egg-laying animals millions of years before chickens even existed. If the question is wether the chicken or the egg containing a chicken specifically came first the answer would still be the egg because chickens were domesticated from the junglefowl and it would've been a semi-domesticated junglefowl that laid the first egg with a true chicken inside.
Once got asked this during some Christian trivia night I was forced to attend and according to them it was the chicken because God made all animals mature. The answer above seems like a good point too.
@@mamutepeq Yes exactly I have no idea how this is even still an argument like I figured this out as a child how are there still people who can't understand this very simple logic?
In my freshman Spanish class, while learning about furniture, there was a legitimate argument about whether pillows were mattresses because you could sleep on them. This eventually changed to whether couch pillows were pillows or mattresses.
One time in summer camp, I got into a fight with a girl because she thought she was eating a peach, when in reality, she was eating a nectarine. We argued for about fifteen minutes, and everyone I talked to during the argument said that it was a nectarine. After the argument, she tried to gaslight me into thinking that she had always thought she was eating a nectarine and we never had that argument because she never thought that. You said that it was a peach, *Maxine*
Maxine made a scene talking 'bout her nectarine. A peach she'd said it been, and she wouldn't just come clean, but all of us had seen, and she wasn't all that keen on thinking we'd be mean, but she'd just been a little green. Thought she was the queen, argued like a damn machine. Went on a good fifteen, almost needed some caffeine, it was honestly obscene, when I left it was serene, and we remember it *Maxine*
me and my friends were arguing over what is considered a flashlight and one of them got so pissed that he literally had to go walk laps around the mall to calm down
Got into an argument with my friends about whether a bungalow was a type of house or its own separate thing They insisted it was different even after I pulled up the definitions for 'bungalow' AND 'house'
@@comradewindowsill4253 Interesting, also I just checked and it says a Cottage can be a Bungalow, but it has some weird properties like sloppy roofs or added second stories... what All I can say is on 3rd of middle school House type vocabulary was the only thing I had totally wrong on my quizzes and exams of English class 😅
My sister and I once got into an argument over whether or not Idaho borders Canada. We were in the car and this was before Smartphones where you could just look anything up right away. When we got back to a computer, turned out I was right, and we both laughed ourselves sick.
Imagine your only knowledge of Idaho being based on Alpha and Omega, holy frick. I guess that's why that movie was so popular in elementary school. Kids must've flipped when they found out their home-state was in a popular children's film. EDIT: I lived in Idaho during Elementary School
@@DaNintendude I don't have to imagine lol, I'm Canadian, and I didn't even know Idaho existed until I watched Alpha and Omega. And I still don't really know anything about it other than it has a forest and borders Canada.
@@F.R.E.D.D2986 I said it did. She said it didn't. And I have no idea how we even got into that topic in the first place, LOL. We live in, and were driving through, Indiana.
Once when I was a kid (about 5yo) I thought my cousins name was Adrien instead of Aidan. I kept insisting that I knew his name better than him and that he was lying to me.
My ex and I got into a very lengthy argument whether the "round, fluffy evergreens" were pines or what. She kept insisting they weren't, nearly had an aneurysm. Turns out she just thought pines were called something else.
This is when I bring out google lmao. I absolutely hate when people insist they're right over something they obviously know nothing about, so instead of arguing, I open google on my phone and turn the screen around so they can read the fucking definition for themselves.
Me and my best friend have this ongoing argument that never ceases. The question is whether a candle or a computer mouse would be better to kill somebody with. This all started from a game that gave us a question based around what random object we pick (ie whos random object would be better to kill someone with) and my friend chose a candle and I chose a mouse.
my friend kept trying to sort all food items into sandwich, salad, soup, or ravioli, which escalated into a shouting match between her and the rest of our table in class about whether or not icecream is a soup. The science teacher ended up getting involved and taking down notes on our arguments because apparently it was "a legitimate, intelligent, intellectual discussion" or something lol Edit: Ok so that you guys can duke it out in the replies, ima give you some of our main arguments. 1. The difference between a soup and a salad is the liquid to solid ratio 2. Icecream, at room temperature, is a liquid, making it a soup. 3. Icecream was not intended to be eaten at room temperature, the intention for how its meant to be consumed matters. 4. Icecream should be a salad instead because you can eat it with a fork (psychopathic but physically you can) and also toppings.
0:32 That guy who said "Go Banana!" Is so wholesome. He motivates the banana, and doesn't care at all about anyone's counterarguement, honestly, my heart goes out to you, potterpockets.
How many holes does a straw have?
Either one or more
It's one hole with two exits, like a donut
It should have 2. Unless you count the fact that the plastic has pores. It foes have pores don't it?
1
depends as someone could use a hole punch to increase the amount of holes in a straw
Fun Fact: The real difference between a muffin and a cupcake isn't whether or not it has icing, but what batter is used to make them. Therefore, a muffin with icing is still a muffin, and a cupcake without icing is still a cupcake.
I agree.
It's in the name
Muffins are closer to bread, cupcakes (as the name implies) are closer to cake.
Edit to add: I meant quick breads. Not all bread has yeast.
@@transsnack muffins are closer than cake to bread because bread has yeast.
@@transsnack If you are saying as the name implies, would muffins be a product resembling muffs? 😂
"Is a frog a fish?"
obviously not, they're amphibians, but we spent the entire class period arguing anyway.
the worst thing about this though?
The two sides of the argument were the entire class vs. the teacher.
the Teacher thought a frog was a fish.
i mean phylogenically,,
,
you are a fish
If we’re gonna be _really_ pedantic about it:
If sharks and salmon are both fish, then so are frogs… and humans.
My class had almost the exact same argument except the teacher thought frogs were reptiles. He bet us a bot of donuts that he was right and researched it when he got home. He arrived next class with donuts.
HUH
@@audimc3193 Legend. He was as good as his word
The conclusion of that pot/pan debate was gold. Of _course_ the US military has *codified* what makes a piece of cookware a pot or a pan.
Now what about the wok...
@@SolTheIdiot They should just wok it out.
@@Soul-Burn good point, now we've got another issue. The plate and the bowl.
@@SolTheIdiotwhat’s the issue? A plate is flat and a bowl is semi sphere like
@@nightmarexgaming120 plate bowls-
The most stupid argument I was ever in was when my brother had to take a urine test and he was genuinely nervous bc "he didn't study for it"
Gotta make sure your bladder has a #2 pencil on hand (ureter?).
what was the argument though 😭 what were the points made by both sides
If he failed, his parents would be pissed.
@@ParkerTheSwordsman SHUT UP AND TAKE MY LIKE
Is your brother the type of person to study for a covid test? Lmao 😭
The dumbest argument I've gotten into was when i brought up that "Is the word Grinch his name, job or ethnicity?" Tweet to my brother
Anyway it got pretty heated so we asked my mom for her opinion and she just said "it's his name, his full name is Elias P. Grinch"
Then my brother left the room and i was like "wait is that really his full name???" And she said, completely stone-faced "what? No, I just made that up."
@@rayqun not falling for that one again
According to the Dr Seuss wiki, his full name is either Ethan Grinch or Ethan Who.
@@skoutburst672 "you're a mean one, Mr. Grinch" his last name is Grinch
The song says so
Actually, that's not too far from the truth. Okay, not really, but apparently Suess said at some point that his name was to be Godwin Grinch, but he shortened it as his character design developed to its more "uncouth" state. He actually did have a full name, at least at the earlier stages of his design.
Okay, in hindsight, might have had one too many Dr. Seuss documentaries on my part. Neat tidbit though.
@@thatgingerbastard9154 huh. Learn something new everyday i guess
There’s almost a feeling of pure bliss whenever you’re arguing with a friend about something that neither of you care about
Or pure frustration - there's no in-between.
@@Jupiter-T That's me, I can't stand arguments, especially useless ones
I argue to prove im right. Theres no greater dopamine rush than winning an argument
Yeah…me and my friend had an argument over text about it All for One was technically the first One for All user in My Hero Academia. It was a very stupid tbh.
@@F.R.E.D.D2986 I love a good debate or two
I love to imagine the two guys actually violently fighting over whether Garfield talks or thinks
He definitely thinks, whether or not he projects his thoughts on jon's mind or if jon is specifically a cat mind reader is not clear
I think the 2nd is more probable since the dog who i forgot the name doesn't respect garfield's desire, jon could not be a general mind reader cause he cannot read the mind of another humans and i think his interactions with the dog are less accurate
Definitely thinks, his text is in a thought bubble rather than a speech bubble.
Garfield thinks. Jon doesnt communicate Garfield directly like he would with a person normally, he just assumes what is Garfield thinking because of his owner-pet bonding.
In the comics, he thinks, he uses thought bubbles not speech bubbles
In the cartoons, he talks, and every character including Jon responds directly
He does either one, depending on the media
The dumbest argument I ever got into was probably whether a tennis ball was yellow or green
Interesting. I work with lifting equipment that is painted in that color and I think there should be a specific name for it if there isnt one already.
Edit: according to google its fluorescent yellow.
All I've got to say is,
I've seen orange ones.
similarly, is a duck egg blue or green?
“Do mermaids have knees?”
Our robotics group never quite recovered after that one question.
they wouldn't. unless mermaids are humans who have evolved and there is remnants of a knee left over (i believe something similar can be found in some whales) then its just a tail and tails don't have knees.
its like saying a fish has knees. just sounds wrong lmao
@@allisonthefox9900 so…. same vibes as horse legs being middle fingers?
@@noodlesnookI'm sorry......What?
they might , since penguins have knees .
I don't think they would since fish don't have knees
a 3 hour fierce debate about pasta shapes with my italian roomate that ended with "if u call it noodles one more time I'll throw ur tamagatchi in the toilet" before they slamed their door and started blasting italian music.
Got into an argument with someone in girl scouts over whether the US had 50 or 52 states. She was convinced Hawaii and Alaska made it 52, as in, there are 50 landlocked states AND THEN Hawaii and Alaska. I dropped out of the scouts soon after
She has a point
It falls apart real fast once you ask them to name all of the states or look them up because suddenly they look like a conspiracy theorist
Washington DC & Superior statehood when?
@@dweebteambuilderjones7627 I get Washington DC as the "51st state" but isn't Superior a lake?
@@Lordmewtwo151 There's a movement to get the upper peninsula of Michigan to become its own state; were this to happen, the new state would be named Superior.
I once got in a legitimate shouting match with a friend of mine about whether death is an activity, and every so often the argument comes up again and ends up in a shouting match again.
We're both archaeologists.
genuine question-- what does your profession have to do with the argument?
@@comradewindowsill4253 That's why we were talking about death as activity in the first place: arguing over whether the presence of a corpse is proof of human activity on a prehistoric site.
@@lucyhartwell2134 Those are two very different questions. The first one is asking if death is an activity, the other one if a corpse proves human activity.
"Activity" =/= "human activity". That's an english problem. Switch you argument in latin. Activity becomes "actio", and human activity becomes "humana operatio." You guys just happen to speak english.
=
Let's start by defining our shit:
Human activity means there are humans.
An activity is something you do to get out of the house and fight boredom.
=
Second question, does a corpse proves human activity on a prehistoric site ? Yes, of course.
First question, is death an activity ? Of course not.
I mean, dying is something you can do, so...I'd say it's an activity. Laying there. Dying. It definitely eats up your schedule and doesn't leave much room for other activities does it?
It takes hours to fill all the paperwork. Dying is not something I recommend
I once argued that pineapples are more dangerous then watermelons because of the spikes. My friend replied that the watermelon was more dangerous because of the mass. So we decided to take some research, we did a total of 4 tests, each test, The watermelon ended up winning, We had 5 pages of research and results. My friend won, and I gave her 2 dollars and a Snickers bar.
Edit: My friend has read your comments, and she saw how people think Durian is a good contender, so we will redo our tests, and will report back on our results.
Edit 2: Durian won, fellas
It's not much of a research grant, but it's a start
Well then.
You're not you when you're hungry
You mean a Snicker bar
@@hiitehinen NO YOU JACKASS THEY MEAN A SNICKERS BAR
I was at school when they turned on the Large Hadron Collider for the first time. A girl told me she wasn't worried about the black hole because it was microscopic, so she wouldn't fit into it. I had the weird experience of having to concede to her that the LHC wasn't dangerous, but also that this was the wrong reason not to be worried about black holes.
I spent a good 3 hours debating with my friends on discord about what the best mode of transportation would be in a zombie apocalypse and we went very in depth with it as well
boat, island.
what conclusion did you come to
@@redfoxlol101 that we weren’t friends anymore
Bicycles: Quiet. Dont need fuel. Fast enough to escape a horde. Compact enough to squeeze through roads clogged with cars and you might even be able to zip through a small crowd. And you can store some loot on it if you have bags.
If you are really skilled, you can even parkour with a mountainbike. Ive seen bicycle cops ride off stairs like it was nothing.
@Svoorhout85 What about a solar powered camper van? That way it's also your base of operations.
i once got into a debate with my father about what constituted a sport. he eventually ended up backing himself into a corner and claiming that war is the only sport.
LMAO WHAT
HUH
War is like the only thing that can't be a sport
All sports are a form of war simulation
AH YES, MY FAVORITE SPORT...
W
A
R
How did that even come about? what started that?
FUN FACT the importance of the person does not define whether it's an assassination, it's whether or not the murder was politically motivated. only politically motivated murder can be called an assassination
You are correct. While it is usually an important person, it has to be for political or religious reasons. Also it has to be a surprise.
So what’s the line between assassination and a hate crime? Or are they just entirely separate things that often go together?
@@gomethins7738 I guess the latter
Oh, the Surprise thing
Killed me😅🤣🤣🤣🤣
- Surprise!
Three things in one; death, politics and (tada!) a... Surprise!
(i'm sorry kindereggs😅)
@@christinae30 I just really like Oxford dictionary
1:30 I love how aggressive the second “DO YOU” was
A stupid argument me and my friends got into was whether or not vegan ice cream was real ice cream
They created an entirely new groupchat because of it
Interesting. It depends on wether the word cream is to be taken litterally. In the Netherlands we just call icecream "ice". But "roomijs" (cream ice) is made with milk and theres also water based icecream.
Well, is it made with cow milk or soy milk? It also depends on the ingredients used to make the flavor.
At least, in the US, the answer is objectively no. The FDA has defined that ice cream is required to have a certain percentage of milk fats. (And if it's frozen custard, also egg yolks) So no, in the US, vegan ice cream is not actually ice cream, but is instead a 'frozen desert'.
I once got into an argument in my class about which dog breed was most likely to go to furrycon. The most interesting conversation i ever had tbh
@@heroinlover9000 real cause that's literally what i picked, golden retrievers won tho
This is a certified 💀 moment
-the ceo of 💀
@@Satellit3 no, husky wins
It's gotta be husky or some kind of giant big fluffy dog
-the ceo of 💀
@@heroinlover9000 me neither, but the annoying kid said so, so since we were tired of him we just let him be
My sister and I had an hours long argument that ended in her crying over whether humans technically count as straws because of our digestive tracts. We were both already adults by that point.
I really hope you showed her the Vsauce video
As a human, I think I'm a straw
As a Heavy tank from world war 2, im pretty sure you arent a straw.
@@Trashpanda115 As a straw, I believe you qualify as 1/3 straw due to your barrel.
@@bloomingdemise Oh shit you right
Fun Fact: GIF is the most argued over word on the internet. It stands for Graphic Interchange Format, btw
Me and my friend have been arguing for 3+ years on whether or not triangles do and can have feelings. We've made presentations which we presented to each other, but she is not ready to admit she's wrong, yet.
Which side is she on?
These are the questions we must ask.
i remember getting into an argument with some friends in middle school over the meaning of the word "flirting".
no, i do not remember if anyone won.
I'd say every participant lost by default
Lol, what were the arguements? I feel quite invested now, I didn’t realise that it could have multiple meanings 😂
Seriously as an autistic asexual who loves complementing people and has trouble differentiating platonic and romantic connection do you have a good answer?
@@NotThisAnonymous Well, you may give the word a dictionary definition, such as "sexual behavior that suggests interest in the other person, genuine or playful", but people are still gonna disagree on what actually constitutes flirting. To some, it can be a simple "hello" or an interested look, while others would only realize that someone's flirting with them if they literally grab them by the crotch lol.
@@benjamincooper358 as someone who is also an autistic asexual, i'm afraid i do not.
I had an argument in kindergarten about which direction was left and which one was right. We were sitting on opposite sides of the table and didn't understand "my left vs your left"
Awww 😄💖
This is amazing
Cute kindergarteners
Once had an argument with a friend about whether the Coriolis Effect would curve a bullet left or right
After 15 minutes we realized we were both arguing the same side but were so bad at articulating our points that we thought we were arguing
I am imagining a hilarious situation where you were both right, or and even funnier situation where, as you were both in kindergarten, you were both wrong.
When I was in preschool, I remember a kid arguing about how I was 3 years old at the time. I was 4. It was basically just going back and forth at this point. I don’t remember what happened at the end, but whenever I think about it I suddenly get a thought that I screamed “I’M 4” at some point.
I also got into an argument with a teacher in first grade once, and the argument was about a story we were reading at the time involving a bird getting injured, and I was arguing that the bird got its leg cut off. I ended up having that same argument with my mom that night.
one time me and my friend argued about which emoji would be the best at pulling girls
Once had an entire family debate over dinner that turned into a screaming match because we couldn't figure out whether you drown or suffocate in *milk*
It only ended because the fridge just randomly spat out an ice cube and the entire table went silent. We didn't speak again for the entire meal.
You drown
If you can drown in pasta sauce you can drown in a beverage
its a liquid so you would drown
I thought drowning was a kind of suffocation.
When even the fridge is sick of your crap
Not a single one of your family members realized that "suffocate" and "drown" are synonyms when used in relation to liquids as the air-supply blockage? Suffocation is the lack of air due to obstruction, while drowning is a specific type of suffocation wherein the obstruction is liquid.
good god, that entire argument about the pots and pans made me laugh so hard, especially "if you can't boil an egg in it, then it's not a pot, you jackass!"
It has fascinating implications for teapots, though.
I was cackling 😭😭
Ok but what if its like on og those really small egs that are like 1 inch yes those exist
Well if i cook an egg in a pat, is it in a pot or a pan?!?
@@DarkShadow32458try a pon next time
My friends and I once had a very heated argument during a school lunch hour about the differences between hitting/stabbing/slashing/cutting someone. Our teachers looked very concerned.
A girl in my high school was arguing with me about what colour my own hair was. She thought she knew my hair colour better than me.
On a different note, one time I got into a different argument with a different girl involving the colour of the purple mirror in her locker. Knowing that it was purple, I said it was pink. She said it was purple. Repeat saying this back and forth like this a few times, and I suddenly switch my stance to say "It's purple", which caused her to start incorrectly saying that it was pink without noticing for a good 2 seconds. She got a little aggressive after she realized. I know it sounds like I'm making this up, but I swear it happened, I have vivid memories of it.
Ahhh, the ol' Duck Season/Rabbit Season.
“And I say ‘FIRE!!’”
The entire debate on which fruit would win in a fight would make for a fun battle royale game. You can call it, Fruit Punch.
YES
I should develop this at one point
@@GamepadStudiosdo it
@@Mets2015WorldSeries Bet, after I'm done with what I'm currently developing rn
The next object show
We were in kindergarten or preschool. We both were very convinced we knew right from left and got into such a shouting match that her mom came over. Technically we were both correct--we just didn't understand that one person's right and left aren't on the same sides as the other person's _when you're facing each other._
that is strangely adorable
I just fell out of my chair after reading this, sounds like something I would do. But not only in kindergarten or preschool. I most likely still do it to this day, my brain isn't braining. ;)
My right and left
Left👈 Right👉
Omg the same argument happened to me! We were so mad that we ended up breaking up our friendship. (We were in kindergarten, when people said “I’m not going to be your friend anymore” all the time) Then a teacher came over and showed us that my right looks left to the person standing in front of me. We were confused at first, then we spun around testing how our left and right changes when it’s mirrored, and we ended up laughing because we were both stupid.
To this day i always ask "my right or your right" if it wasn't specified
My friend and I once had a debate about what's the difference between being able to mimic something and copy something
We were discussing this as though it was Kirby abilities
Dumbest but also most fun was in jazz band. It lasted the entire hour and a half class and ended in three of my classmates planking while watching a movie. It was the classic “Is water wet?” debate, plus a few others such as “Is fire hot?” and “Is air dry?” We spent the entire class arguing, searching definitions of words like “wet” and “soaked” and had to legitimately stop and decide whether milk is a liquid. Funniest part? It was the class against our band director
I remember one time I was watching Markiplier's Until Dawn gameplay with my brother and I heard the sound of a bird flying and I said it was a pigeon (because pigeons make a 'whistling' sound when they flap their wings) but he said it was a crow and we started yelling at each other (it was 3 AM) until I went to sleep in frustration. The next day we rewatched the video and discovered it was an eagle.
ostrich
@@daisyxo1341 Ñandú
Your profile picture really adds to the story. Team pigeon all the way I guess.
A friend and I got into an argument over if penguins are birds. Their argument was that, because penguins don't fly, they don't count as birds. I asked them what a penguin is if it isn't a bird, and they replied "whatever it is, it isn't a bird".
We were seniors in high school.
Wonder what your friend would think of ostriches then, lol
@@wingedspectre I'd assume that they'd think ostriches weren't birds either!
Evidently they haven't seen the BBC's Flying Penguin video then.
...Your friend should probably go back to elementary
I HAD THE SAME EXACT ARGUEMENT WITH A FRIEND A WEEK AGO AND THEY ALSO SAID "Birds aren't animals, are they?"
Someone tried to tell me I was wrong about my own birthdate.
I think I’d know how old I am, Jessica.
My science class once got into an argument of if a mouse and a fish had a baby, would it have gills, or would it have lungs
I love the utter contempt matt has for that argument about the dress.
The stupidest argument I have ever had is probably all the agruments I have had with my mum about whether various clothing items and blankets are green. She thinks i am colour blind, i think she is overly generous in what things are green
they're turquoise aren't they
same exact viewpoint.
Yeah people who call teal/turqoise stuff green really baffle me. Same with calling red stuff orange when it's even like, _slightly_ orange. Like thas red motherfucker
everything is green
i had ''would a tall person or a short person win a football match''
4:42 he's right, the ability to be stupid requires the capacity to have intelligence in the first place.
Yeah, if a person was born without a brain they wouldn't be stupid.
I mean, rocks can't willingly jump off roofs for $5 but people sure can.
**Rock stands up**
**Rock smolders**
*"The rock did not turn over stone cold"*
**Rock does sus stare**
But lacking the ability to be smart is literally the definition of being stupid😊
@@marchadow3957 No. Sorry (haha) :)
The term word "Stupid" means to 'show a *great lack* of intelligence or common sense' - oxford dictionary.
Notice the words great and lack. These imply there is a measurable quantity of something. Since it refers to intelligence/common sense, it implies there is a measurable quantity of intelligence, and since lack means 'not available or in short supply' (oxford), it very really means having a 'big part (great) without', meaning that there would or would've been the ability or attribute of intelligence/common sense in the first place, in order to have 'great lack'.
If 'Stupid' meant lacking the ability to be smart, then it would say 'complete lack' or 'total lack' or the likes. Even the word 'lacking' in it's various contexts implies there's or was a measureable substance of the initial term to begin with, this being intelligence or common sense.
But, due to it saying great lack, we must concur that your statement is wrong.
:D
"Is it a jaccusi for guinny pigs?" Made me fall off the couch, burst into a coughing fit and bang my head. I don't even knoe what I hit it on😂😂😂
Jacuzzi* Guinea* Banged* Know* what I hit my head on (Specification is a common requirement.)* Sorry to be a grammar bot, but I get really pissed off when I notice someone make a mistake in their sentences.
please do another part to this we need more
also watched this video with my mates then proceeded to get into an argument about who would win in a fight between an ant in a human body or a velociraptor in a human body (they would each have the same attributes their respective species has)
The fact that matt did multiple voices makes this even more glorious.
doesn't he usually??
My entire American History class got into an argument on whether Google is a source. The stupid part about it is that it spanned the length of a week.
Google doesn't tell you information, it leads you to the places that tell you information. Google isn't a source, it finds sources for you.
But... it's a search engine... that would be like citing the local library as your source instead of the books/articles you read in that library.
Or maybe even more accurately citing the index of said library
@@Jray608 I would agree
why would it be a source?
They should have googled it lol.
the last question is somewhat simple, a wok is a section of a sphere and a pan is a cylinder with rounded off edges, the pan always has a flat surface that tapers of at the ends around an inch or 2
My friend and I once had an impassioned late-night argument about how many states I would have been to when I came back from a long trip. She said that "states" was a term exclusive to the US, so I couldn't count other countries. It got to the point where we were shouting at each other about the Department of State and various uses of the word, while our other friend just watched bemusedly.
I witnessed physical threats occur at my school over whether or not horses could digest ham.
if dragons that had animus power before jerboa's spell was cast had eggs would the dragonets be animus dragons if they had the gene
@epictoast
I don’t think so. Her spell was specifically aimed at all existing animus dragons. So if they were not hatched, the spell would still apply because they existed when the spell was cast.
But they can still have the gene to pass on to future generations and new animus dragons and still hatch because she never said anything about new animus dragons.
If someone was able to get all the shards together would animus magic be restored? When jeraboa placed the spell she only said when the item is broken. So if it was put together would it be fixed? What would work to fix it? Glue, flamesilk or something else? My opinion is that it would bring back animus magic but you couldn't use a normal item like glue/tape and if you were trying to put it back together you would need an icewing gift.
they can, horses are omnivores
@@eggchomp i'm sorry, do you mean to tell me i could feed a body to a fucking *horse* and get away with it?
I vaguely remember about a year or so ago I got into a heated argument with my mom about “if you bake cookies and cook bacon, why are they named that way”. I ended up yelling “why don’t I just call cookies bakies then, and bacon cookon?” and my mom left the room immediately.
It upsets me that Matt Rose didn't pin this
@@schoo9256 lmaooo don’t be that upset my guy
@@treefrog2923 it's ok gurl, I'll be fine. Someday... 🫠
@@schoo9256 gurl ??? lmao imagine being female /lh
@@treefrog2923 it's a hobby of mine when people assume I'm a guy online I assume they're a girl. Just to even things out :😜
Some of these in the videos would be wildly fascinating to have a discussion about!
"Whether Mike Tyson could beat a silverback gorilla" which escalated to, "Well what if the gorilla had his hands tied behind his back?"
The whole school, including the gym coach that could box, was in on it...
I had a year long argument with one of my friends in school if Narwhals were real or not, I ended up putting papers for the entire school to vote on: "Are Narwhal real? YES or NO" my overwhelming victory wasn't enough to convince her, nor did the natural geographic documentaries, "they could be CGI" she said "they could be costumes with two people inside, like those horse ones" she exclaimed "they could be robots like those tiny fish toys that swim in pools" she proclaimed! This was hell, WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD THEY MAKE A DOCUMENTARY ABOUT A FAKE ANIMAL!?!?
Either way after one of the longest years of my life and some of the dumbest points in the world, made by both parties, I finally convinced her. But she still gives me the death stare every time they are mentioned, I'm convinced that after 6 months she was just disagreeing with me out of pure spite.
That's kind of weird but I miss this kind of interaction of school days..
Well.. they made a documentary about mermaids
@@Twinklethefox9022 don’t you dare start this again!
@@iceran9822 they also made one on dragons
If you've ever seen "The future is Wild" you'll know they make documentaries on all sorts of crazy stuff
One time when I was a little kid, my dad and I got into an argument over whether a bug we saw outside was a bee or a wasp. He said he would show me a picture and explain the difference and I simply responded with "I KNOW WHAT I SAW."
They look very similar tho, probably why many still call wasps "bees"
One of them is a helpful and essential part of our ecosystem. The other is spawned from hell by Satan himself
I still can’t distinguish them very well but wasps love eating meat 😅 One even bit a chunk of flesh from my dad’s arm while he was gardening 😅
Well in general, smooth bees are wasps, fuzzy wasps are bees, and if it doesn’t have wings it’s probably an ant.
And also like Kevser said, wasps are mostly carnivorous while you won’t get a bee trying to eat other insects.
@@darkstarr984 wasps also like any kind of fruit jam 😅 it’s your garden breakfast’s biggest enemy 😅
I once had a huge argument with my dad as he didn't think it was possible to have a three way tie in the voting round of the weakest link.
I remember getting into a fight with my friends on if they would be able to beat an angry gorilla in an MMA match if you got ample prep time, and a shotgun.
They said no.
How is it an mma match if you get a shotgun.
Fun Fact:
These kinds of arguments are exactly why the Guiness Book of World Records was created
The 2 creators were having an argument about something dumb, and realized 'it would be amazing if there was a book that kept track of stuff like this'
It was actually Guinness the beer company who did this to resolve a dispute held by two men in a bar.
seriously?
@/hvtrs8%2F-wuw%2Cymuvu%60e%2Ccmm-cjalngl-UAaEcf8FvReLsrEPq%3AI%409WpC I thought it was weird the two names were the same. It just means i'm too stupid to make the connection.
Yep. @@NTVE404
Also for money.
My entire physics class (me included) once got into an argument about whether the shaker cheese in pizza parlors was a powder or not. It was pretty much the whole class saying it was a powder against this one very persuasive guy who said it was "shredded."
Let me tell you, I'm not lying when I say this shit got INTENSE. We were citing sources, at one point I pulled out a CHEESE PHASE DIAGRAM (don't ask), We were doing dramatic readings of rheology textbooks, someone found an article on the shear modulus of cheese types, and someone else even cited some guy on Quora named Ilgaz Soykal (yes we are all massive fucking nerds). We were arguing about this for the WHOLE CLASS (it was a substitute teacher, and the class didn't have many lectures anyway).
After class, someone ended up asking the chemistry teacher, and she said it was a powder, so tAKE THAT, DAVE.
To this day, mentioning cheese around any of those people triggers a fight-or-flight response.
You can’t hit us with the cheese phase diagram and expect us to not ask.
Props to shredded cheese guy for holding his own against you all for a whole class period
i would be on the shredded cheese guy as i've won arguments where i was wrong before
Some could argue it was shredded very finely that it became a powder
I didnt understand a single thing you said im not from english
4:19 Einstien could literally make a nuclear power plant from scraps for an indefinite source of electricity.
It's like playing Conflux in heroes of might & magic 3; early on they suck but they're op late game.
I love the Air Force pot and pan specification so much because I love it when some serious organization has to clarify something that pedantically.
I mean there’s a like 20 page military recipe for brownies
@@EllpaFox47 WHERE I MUST HAVE IT.
@@a-mae-zing-mae8541the military probably
i dont know I've only heard of it
@@a-mae-zing-mae8541 you have to join the navy to get the brownie recipe, its how they keep their recruit numbers up
@@a-mae-zing-mae8541 If you search for MIL-C-44072C you should find it
And it's that long because it establishes shipping, defects and scientific standards for the ingredients
Throughout the last few years of my secondary school two girls had a famous and genuinely passionate years long argument about whether if you cut a sandwich in half you now have two sandwiches or one sandwich in two halves. People would randomly bring up he topic when they were both in the room and enjoy the fallout
One sandwich, because the two halves form one whole
It’s kinda like breaking a cookie in half isn’t it. They’re two sandwiches but they used to make up one whole one. Either answer isn’t necessary wrong. It’s all based on your perspective.
Both are correct. On their own they are two individual sandwiches, but together make up the two halves of a greater sandwich.
This is literally the question of "glass half full" and "glass half empty."
Well if a sandwich is 2 slices of bread with something in between then that means by cutting it in half you now have two sandwiches.
I jokingly mentioned to some friends that I could spend an hour arguing over who would win in a fight between Mr Incredible and Darth Vader. This evolved into an actual 90 minute analysis between a few of us.
One time I got into a 10 minute argument over if "Burger quesadilla" or "Quesadilla burger" would be the grammatically correct name for a quesadilla with a patty and cheese
Me and my friends got into an argument over wether or not it was appropriate for me to say “deez nuts” right before everyone were going to sleep, and it somehow escalated into being about Napoleon’s invasion of The Netherlands. It sounds extremely random but somehow it actually happened.
HHHHHHHHHHAHAHHHHHHHHHHHHAHHH WHAT?
full story?
@@raven.petrichor I sent my friends a bunch of messages that made it appear as if I was going to say something important, but I was actually prancing them as my line of messages ended with deez nutz. These sort of pranks where quite common within our group, and some of us where getting tired of them and felt it was time for us to stop it with these pranks. Not everyone agreed however, and so we began arguing. After some time, one of the arguers said he felt like we were disrespecting and undermining him and so he asked “DO YOU ANY OF YOU IDIOTS EVEN KNOW WHAT THE NETHERLANDS WERE CALLED DURING NAPOLEONIC TIMES?!” as he feels smarter than us because of his knowledge of history. One guy googled the answer, and the guy who shouted said it was wrong. From there onwards, the heated discussion was about Napoleon, and nothing else
@@tacolordc that sounds like smth that would happen to me and my friends lmao
@@tacolordc No one disrespects the United Provinces...Unless you're Napoleon, in that case you put your brother on the throne and call it the FUCKING BATAVIAN REPUBLIC
I can see why you argued about it though, The Dutch Republics have changed names, emperors, titles and geographic position what feels like every decade for 400-500 years
my sister and dad once got into the hugest fucking argument about who got to cut the pineapple we were gonna eat, it escalated so far that my dad ended up hiding the pineapple and my sister pushed a chair over so hard it left a gash in the floor (the story ended with my dad sneaking me the whole pineapple before I left for uni again, so I actually gained something from the argument lol)
so your dad hid the pineapple and saved it as a going away present? and you were uni age when this argument happened? so many questions
🍍moment
Tried to imagine how this can escalate, I give up
🍍 moment
🍍 moment
Two hour argument about if water was soup. Got an entire discord chat in a very popular server arguing about it.
The pot / pan arguments is absolutely hilarious to me because it reminds me of an argument a streamer got into with his chat about whether or not there are actually pots in Breath of The Wild (the cooking pots are based on woks but without a handle, so they look like giant stone bowls over a campfire). The argument never went anywhere, and eventually devolved into chat and the streamer deciding that bread is soup, and it's still one of the most hilarious clips I've ever seen in my whole life.
Bread isn’t soup tho
It’s bread!
@@EllpaFox47ok SOOOO
The cube rule of food is a crude way of identifying what a food it based on starch content. Here are the classifications:
No starch: Soup
1 side: Toast
2 sides: Sandwich
3 sides: Taco
4 sides: Roll
5 sides: Bread bowl
6 sides: Calzone
2 or more layers: Cake
Filled Cube: Bread
Hope this clears things up :)
@@TheBillyBoi123 Wouldn't that make bread a calzone? because its always all bread and completely enclosed by bread on all sides? How did they come to the conclusion of soup?
@@amabeeps4646 Well, for the bread thing, I kinda forgot to mention that a filled in cube would be bread.
For the soup thing…I have no idea
Op where’s the clip
Dumbest argument I’ve had: Mother and I arguing over if your spouse was always your best friend. Mom said yes, I said no. I asked my dad and my married brother who their best friends were, both said their male best friends. This led to my mom ignoring us for the rest of the day and giving my dad the cold shoulder.
Ideally yes but usually no
@@karnickel-s33d16 To be fair, people in relationships still have their own lives
@@Summerstrider Yeah I think it's healthy to have close relationships with people not related to you
all the bitter old people that post "i hate my spouse" jokes:
i think being in love with someone kind of elevates them to another level beyond "best friend," and besides, you can have multiple best friends
I got into an argument with my sister about the hydrodynamics of a cardboard boat. It lasted an hour and ended with cardboard scraps.
To answer the beginning, 127 hours is a true story. He left his arm there until professionals could remove the rock and they properly disposed the arm.
Had an argument that lasted for weeks with my friends about how dolphins would get around on land if they could survive out of water. I said they would log roll, one of my friends insisted they would ride scooters, and another genuinely said they would just levitate.
I'm fairly sure they can survive out of water, unless they need constant moisturisation.
The problem with most cetaceans (at least the big ones) is that they rely on being in water to support their bodies. Beach a big whale and the main cause of death will be that it was crushed by it’s own body weight. I’m not sure if this applies to “smaller” dolphins such as the bottlenose, spinner, or Commerson’s dolphin- but it does apply to the larger ones like orcas. I do think moisterization could be a factor too, but I’m not sure of that either.
I was thinking of how the hell would a dolphin riding a scooter be rational LOL but then I realized was your friend just thinking about Dr. Blowhole from the Penguins of Madagascar TV series???
Car
@@joel784you are a genius unappreciated in your own time
Dumbest arguement ive ever been in was with my brother about an imaginary stick. We got into a first fight about whose it was. Our mom had to take the IMAGINARY stick
there sure seems to be plenty of things that parenting books can never prepare you for
me and my cousin had a similar thing happen except instead of an imaginary stick it was just a regular stick that was shoved into a bbq package. we fought over it for 3 hours in the middle of the woods. still have the stick
@@GAYBLOKE do you share custody of the stick? 1 week with them and 1 week wit you? Or is it in a common area where both of you can admire it?
@@germaxicus6670 my cousin only visits me in summer or chrostmas cause he lives really far so its mostly mine but he tried to steal it every time hes here
@@GAYBLOKE might wanna put some security for that stick before they actually do find a way to steal it...
I'm really glad at least one of these had a definitive answer.
"If you listen to audiobook can you say you've read the book" is actually relatable as hell. Audio is the best way I process information since I was a kid. I had a LOT new books this year and most of them were in audio format and some told me it doesn't count
a few days ago, we had a day at my school where everyone had to come dressed up. about eight people came together and decided they would all dress as jesus. when all of my friends saw them walk past, it devolved into a massive screaming argument about if the plural of jesus is jesuses or jesi.
Jesus is a name, so it's jesuses. Jesi just sounds silly.
Jesae
@@sylvanticxI mean, this would be wrong, since -ae is the feminine plural of 1st declension nouns in Latin, while the name Jesus is a masculine 2nd declension noun in Latin. Therefore, Jesi is technically the correct answer in Latin. In English though, I'd argue Jesuses.
@@ashwinnmyburgh9364 Jesus didn't speak Latin. He likely spoke Aramaic. I don't know Aramaic, nor do I know much about Aramaic, but best I can figure out with some googling is that Jesus would have likely pluraled himself as "Yeshe" (ישוע). In Hebrew, this would be something like Y'shu'im (I also don't speak Hebrew, but I know a little from 7 years of Hebrew school and a lot of time in synagogue) (ישועים maybe, but that looks wrong, and I've never been good at spelling in Hebrew, so maybe it's ישוים without the ayin). I'm pretty sure Jesus was supposed to be learned or something, so he might have spoken Hebrew. I don't know why I'm arguing about this, I'm not even Christian.
If -i or -s is used has nothing to with the spelling of the word, that's a "correlation does not imply causation" thing: the difference is if the word has a Greek or Latin origin. The Greeks pluralised with -i, so words with Greek origins still do, while the Latins used -s, -m, -a, or -um, which we've simplified to just the first. Also, English defaults to -s if it's from some other language, a trait we got from French.
Keep in mind it gets a bit tricky if the word started out as Greek but became a Latin word by assimilation. For example, we don't say "Phobi" because we don't say "Phobos". "Phobia" is a Latin word, so we're using a middle step. Octopus connects directly to the Greek "oktōpous", with no Latin mid-step. Thus, Octopi.
QED, "Jesus" would pluralise as Jesuses, because it is from the Latin "Iēsous".
My Dad used to lead my local Beavers (the level before Cubscouts) group. At some point an argument developed between some of the kids and my Dad, over whether they could run faster than a kicked football. This resulted in my Dad bringing a ball, us all going outside, him kicking it, and us trying to beat it to the end of the field.
This was intended to prove his point once and for all, but became a semi-regular activity because everyone wanted another go.
I'll repeat that: some 5 to 8 year olds thought they could run faster than 60mph (the rough average speed of a kicked football), they raced against a ball doing about 65 mph, and they then kept trying this almost weekly afterwards.
Strangely enough, the football won.
Sounds like a good version of High Intensity Interval Training tbh
not the weirdest anime training arc I've heard of tbh
@twinostrich8045 so what's the secret to this new generation of record breaking sprinters in the Olympics?
"Me da made us race a footy when we were kids cos carl said he could beat it".
Fascinating! Genius!
@@EvilGremlin100 Top sprinters had to run 10 miles to school as kids.
I mean, probably. It's a surprisingly common story.
@@twinostrich8045 didn't know my parents were top sprinters..
Matt, your videos are awesome - I literally cry laughing!!
all of these question either involve concepts we made up and so have no correct answer, or do have a correct answer that can be easily verified within seconds
The stupidest argument I've ever had was on whether two lasagnas stacked on top of each other were two lasagnas or one big lasagna. I don't even remember what my stance was.
I'd say the way it came out of the oven constitutes one lasagna. Stacking two pieces does not make it one.
Although, I absolutely love the thought of tall lasagna.
Megalasagna for sure
@@cameronbigley7483Facts, you gotta bake a twice as tall lasagna to make it twice as tall
Two lasagnas, unless the bottom one is cheeseless.
There was an argument on my bus in high school if water was wet or if it *made* things wet. A war almost broke out and we unintentionally split ourselves across both sides of the bus
Oh and it lasted like 2 weeks
I personally was on the 'it makes things wet' - it drove most of my friends insane
I feel like it'd escalate as i would not be able to resist pointing out that we can't actually feel wetness just the temperature difference
@@knelly7132 no it’s wet. FIGHT ME
Well, it's easy: If water makes things that it touches wet, it therefore must be wet because surface tension decrees that water is always in contact with more water, therefore water is always wet.
once got into an argument in a discord server over whether it was 2 AM or 3 AM.
we were in different time zones.
Whether pinocchio saying: "my nose will grow now" was an actual paradox.
I once had a HEATED all-caps argument with my friend on how to spell croissant. She INSISTED it was spelled “cwossa” and/ or “cwoassant”. The argument came to a close when she got distracted by a photo of Mr. Clean someone else in the group chat sent because she thought it looked like her former math teacher.
Once when I was a kid, I asked my mom to take a picture of me. She said yes, but on her way to get the camera, her partner at the time who I'll call Rick was like "HOW WERE YOU SO EASILY PERSUADED BY A KID!?" as though taking a couple of pictures was somehow harmful. The argument escalated to the point where Rick punched a hole in the wall, somehow taking out a light switch in the process. Meanwhile I was sitting there posing and waiting.
All the battling fruit ought to turn their wrath upon Rick...
I shall henceforth refer to him as: Pickle Rick.
Good thing he's not still around, that sounds like a dude with genuine control issues
Are you missing some details here, this doesn't make any sense
@@oldjose9110i kid you not some people genuinely act like this
r/kids are fucking stupid
The most heated up argument I've been in was "what was first the chicken or the egg". It happened during 2nd year of uni in the kitchen of a shared house of 4 people. It ended when everyone stormed off of the kitchen swearing and calling each other names and retreating to our respective rooms so we could cool down. We didn't talk to the guys on the otherside of the argument for a couple of weeks. 10/10
The answer is objectively the egg, there were millions of egg-laying animals millions of years before chickens even existed. If the question is wether the chicken or the egg containing a chicken specifically came first the answer would still be the egg because chickens were domesticated from the junglefowl and it would've been a semi-domesticated junglefowl that laid the first egg with a true chicken inside.
Once got asked this during some Christian trivia night I was forced to attend and according to them it was the chicken because God made all animals mature. The answer above seems like a good point too.
I think the answer will elude us forever because we have to find out how existence itself came into being to answer that.
@@LeeM22 I believe that god is real, but the bible is nonsense written by some guys to make money.
@@mamutepeq Yes exactly I have no idea how this is even still an argument like I figured this out as a child how are there still people who can't understand this very simple logic?
I love all the different voices he puts on for the various ........arguees?
I love how as soon as one person asks a ridiculous question, they both immediately take opposite sides. They want it.
In my freshman Spanish class, while learning about furniture, there was a legitimate argument about whether pillows were mattresses because you could sleep on them. This eventually changed to whether couch pillows were pillows or mattresses.
Ridiculous, you can sleep on the ground, but the earth doesn’t just become your giant mattress. Mattresses are bed-specific.
They're both cushions, one is for your body and the other is for specifically your head.
love how one dumb argument reaches an outrageous conclusion, that inevitably ends up starting another dumb argument lol
@@FixedKarma all cushions are pillows but not all pillows are cushions. A mattress is not a cushion
Is floor mattress then?
One time in summer camp, I got into a fight with a girl because she thought she was eating a peach, when in reality, she was eating a nectarine. We argued for about fifteen minutes, and everyone I talked to during the argument said that it was a nectarine. After the argument, she tried to gaslight me into thinking that she had always thought she was eating a nectarine and we never had that argument because she never thought that.
You said that it was a peach, *Maxine*
She's probably gaslighted you the whole time
I strongly dislike people acting like that
Battle of the stonefruits: the opening volley. No one was ever quite the same after...
Maxine made a scene talking 'bout her nectarine. A peach she'd said it been, and she wouldn't just come clean, but all of us had seen, and she wasn't all that keen on thinking we'd be mean, but she'd just been a little green. Thought she was the queen, argued like a damn machine. Went on a good fifteen, almost needed some caffeine, it was honestly obscene, when I left it was serene, and we remember it *Maxine*
Aren't they the same? I thought the only difference was that peaches have the "fuzz"
me and my friends were arguing over what is considered a flashlight and one of them got so pissed that he literally had to go walk laps around the mall to calm down
Everyone is now mad at me for laughing at this at the breakfast table and also my screen is now more cracked then ever.
Got into an argument with my friends about whether a bungalow was a type of house or its own separate thing
They insisted it was different even after I pulled up the definitions for 'bungalow' AND 'house'
Idc about house types, so idk
I don't even know what a bungalow is
@@genio2509 it's a one story house iirc, probably no basement either
@@comradewindowsill4253 Interesting, also I just checked and it says a Cottage can be a Bungalow, but it has some weird properties like sloppy roofs or added second stories... what
All I can say is on 3rd of middle school House type vocabulary was the only thing I had totally wrong on my quizzes and exams of English class 😅
The important question is whether the bungalow/house is a home
@@vashtic2036 Depends if it's where the heart is
My sister and I once got into an argument over whether or not Idaho borders Canada. We were in the car and this was before Smartphones where you could just look anything up right away. When we got back to a computer, turned out I was right, and we both laughed ourselves sick.
I guess neither of you watched Alpha and Omega as kids lol
Imagine your only knowledge of Idaho being based on Alpha and Omega, holy frick.
I guess that's why that movie was so popular in elementary school. Kids must've flipped when they found out their home-state was in a popular children's film.
EDIT: I lived in Idaho during Elementary School
@@DaNintendude I don't have to imagine lol, I'm Canadian, and I didn't even know Idaho existed until I watched Alpha and Omega. And I still don't really know anything about it other than it has a forest and borders Canada.
Who said what? Did you Idaho bordered Canada?
@@F.R.E.D.D2986 I said it did. She said it didn't. And I have no idea how we even got into that topic in the first place, LOL. We live in, and were driving through, Indiana.
"Are you suggesting Coconuts migrate?" Popped into my head cause of that fruit bit
Once when I was a kid (about 5yo) I thought my cousins name was Adrien instead of Aidan. I kept insisting that I knew his name better than him and that he was lying to me.
“Do bird seeds grow birds?” Their argument was that, “when I put bird seeds out at night, in the morning there are birds there!”
My ex and I got into a very lengthy argument whether the "round, fluffy evergreens" were pines or what. She kept insisting they weren't, nearly had an aneurysm. Turns out she just thought pines were called something else.
I would have just replied its a gymnosperm/ conifer.
This is when I bring out google lmao. I absolutely hate when people insist they're right over something they obviously know nothing about, so instead of arguing, I open google on my phone and turn the screen around so they can read the fucking definition for themselves.
@@Riva_Ridge thing is, she kept insisting they were fir trees, and both fir trees and pines are conifers.
My mom and dad got into a two-day argument over whether or not you sweat in the pool. Neither one won.
Me and my best friend have this ongoing argument that never ceases. The question is whether a candle or a computer mouse would be better to kill somebody with. This all started from a game that gave us a question based around what random object we pick (ie whos random object would be better to kill someone with) and my friend chose a candle and I chose a mouse.
my friend kept trying to sort all food items into sandwich, salad, soup, or ravioli, which escalated into a shouting match between her and the rest of our table in class about whether or not icecream is a soup. The science teacher ended up getting involved and taking down notes on our arguments because apparently it was "a legitimate, intelligent, intellectual discussion" or something lol
Edit: Ok so that you guys can duke it out in the replies, ima give you some of our main arguments.
1. The difference between a soup and a salad is the liquid to solid ratio
2. Icecream, at room temperature, is a liquid, making it a soup.
3. Icecream was not intended to be eaten at room temperature, the intention for how its meant to be consumed matters.
4. Icecream should be a salad instead because you can eat it with a fork (psychopathic but physically you can) and also toppings.
Ice cream is none of those. It's just... "frozen dairy product"
I used to let my icecream melt and then eat it. I called it chocolate soup since it was oreo icecream with chocolate sauce
I hate the cube rule so much.
Where would a steak fit into those groups?
@@ariesdragonproductions It's a frozen soup.
0:32 That guy who said "Go Banana!" Is so wholesome. He motivates the banana, and doesn't care at all about anyone's counterarguement, honestly, my heart goes out to you, potterpockets.
You mean Ralph?
It's a reference to The Simpsons
read the one who said kiwis don’t fly
edit: i was talking about the name but he also spelled birds as brids