Djokovic--most successful player with all the important records. Federer--the most naturally gift, the amazing arsenal of skills and the fans' favorite.
This video will be on repeat for me.❤️❤️❤️nothing beats Roger’s sprints to the net and to the baseline. I will rather watch Roger’s old videos rather than some boring, hitting from the baseline 30+ pt rallies. Roger would be the best tennis person to ever hold a racquet if the courts had not slowed down. And the bonus: the best outfits, great slow motion shots, complete with beautiful hair, oh and u don’t have to hear an annoying grunt, and the stunned look on his opponent’s faces.
I thought he had a 0.00000000000000000000000000002 percent chance of winning the point, glad someone corrected me. I'm not sure how this is measured, but thanks. I used a slide rule covered in mayonnaise for my calculations, along with the Solunar tables from the back of Field & Stream.
@@initialize21 Federer was just farming before the Big 3 materialized, Djokovic peaked during the Big 3. He's the best, only slightly, but he is the best. Federer is better looking though for sure
@@initialize21 this is up to speculation my friend , djokovic's peak looked really scary in 2011 and also from mid 2015 to early 2016 when he won the 4 slams of that period , statisticly during that period no one dominated tennis like djokovic did in the history of tennis and federer was playing well in 2015 as well as andy murray who was in prime time , about 2011 season I think it was even more impressive considering nadal was at his peak federer was at the end of his prime but still very good and Murray was getting very good . To me djokovic doesnt have any weakness and therefore is more complete than federer for the entire course of their carreer, the peak for peak conversation for me is 50-50 because the eye test tells me federer of 2005/2006 might very well blow peak djokovic out of the court but also djokovic statisticly has done insane stuff for me to count him off , in the end it will come down to the type of surface they play in and it will always be 50-50ish imo
@@soheiladam7510 How about this, instead? TH-cam videos that don't incorporate such nonsense to begin with. "Federer had almost no chance of winning the point...what happened next is legendary!" See? Not difficult at all.
![[ไฮไลต์] ฟุตบอลชาย ญี่ปุ่น vs ปารากวัย รอบแบ่งกลุ่ม | โอลิมปิก 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/X_BeGaAv1oM/mqdefault.jpg)
Djokovic--most successful player with all the important records. Federer--the most naturally gift, the amazing arsenal of skills and the fans' favorite.
Federer, simply the best.
i cant get over the control RF has under such pressure
This video will be on repeat for me.❤️❤️❤️nothing beats Roger’s sprints to the net and to the baseline.
I will rather watch Roger’s old videos rather than some boring, hitting from the baseline 30+ pt rallies. Roger would be the best tennis person to ever hold a racquet if the courts had not slowed down.
And the bonus: the best outfits, great slow motion shots, complete with beautiful hair, oh and u don’t have to hear an annoying grunt, and the stunned look on his opponent’s faces.
Absolutly agree ...boring long and noise tennis
Impressive collection of high-quality clips - nice work
The editing is not so good---the whole point should be included, starting with the serve,.
Porque estes caras envelhecem?
A final feminina de RG24 mostrou que vai demorar aparecer outra Serena. Ontem a Iga nem suou para ganhar da Paolini.
The way Granollers looked to his camp.
I thought he had a 0.00000000000000000000000000002 percent chance of winning the point, glad someone corrected me. I'm not sure how this is measured, but thanks. I used a slide rule covered in mayonnaise for my calculations, along with the Solunar tables from the back of Field & Stream.
❤❤
You could play the perfect point against this dude, and still lose.
0.01 %....Démontrez-le mathématiquement puisque 0.01 % est de nature mathématique ! Nous sommes impatients de vous lire !
Djokovic is the best but federer is the biggest legend of tennis
Well, Federer had a better peak and better natural skills and talent. So Federer is indeed better
@@initialize21 Federer was just farming before the Big 3 materialized, Djokovic peaked during the Big 3. He's the best, only slightly, but he is the best. Federer is better looking though for sure
It's one reason why I still consider Federer the GOAT, even with Djokovic's better stats.
@@initialize21 this is up to speculation my friend , djokovic's peak looked really scary in 2011 and also from mid 2015 to early 2016 when he won the 4 slams of that period , statisticly during that period no one dominated tennis like djokovic did in the history of tennis and federer was playing well in 2015 as well as andy murray who was in prime time , about 2011 season I think it was even more impressive considering nadal was at his peak federer was at the end of his prime but still very good and Murray was getting very good . To me djokovic doesnt have any weakness and therefore is more complete than federer for the entire course of their carreer, the peak for peak conversation for me is 50-50 because the eye test tells me federer of 2005/2006 might very well blow peak djokovic out of the court but also djokovic statisticly has done insane stuff for me to count him off , in the end it will come down to the type of surface they play in and it will always be 50-50ish imo
How was that potential winning percentage calculated, exactly? I swear, TH-cam videos can have the dumbest titles...
just ignore it like many people do. Advice: don't take TH-cam seriously.
@@soheiladam7510 How about this, instead? TH-cam videos that don't incorporate such nonsense to begin with. "Federer had almost no chance of winning the point...what happened next is legendary!" See? Not difficult at all.
why people suddenly started talking at the beginning of every video or is it just one person.😮 i'm not a fan of that.