@@greenthizzle4 Yes because stealing intellectual property is allowed. Who needs to register their reasons and uses to the intellectual property owner/company before taking the assets first right?
Add859 TankiOnline I mean it doesn’t matter. Elon made the patents public for the betterment of the world, because he actually cares and doesn’t just pretend to.
@@stormsurge1850 Key word "for the betterment of the world" now how are you going to know what people are going to do with teslas assets/patents? Maybe they will use it for nefarious purposes!
In 2018, they were valued at $3.2 billion and last year around 6. But amazon got them only for 1.2 so it doesn't look like they r taking off or even close to that!
prospect: That's one reason this kind of thing is only level 4 at this point. Level 5 will be all weather and any location. ALL this stuff is VERY far from that. I predict some limited L4 systems like the Uber cabs in part of Tempe, AZ, and the Mobileye plans for a Jerusalem cab service, which will slowly spread out and get better, but be strictly geofenced and somewhat weather constrained for a long time.
What I want to know is what the car does in the wrong situation. What about emulating driving when a car swerveds in the lane while it also detects an 18wheeler behind it. So that is 2 calculations to make and at what point does the car know that an impact might happen to deploy.
something tells me that once developed, Amazon's gonna try hard to buy this Edit: I said Amazon specifically because that's what Bezos has done all these years, he just buys something (store or anything) and then scales it so that it reaches everyone (except the original bookstore, he built that)
Frankly, the 1%-ers will get involved and finance fleets of vehicles in a given area. The winners of the tech war will just lobby to these syndicates and the world will go on. Its doubtful that governements will get involded in public taxis ecept to charge them for road fees.
Tesla Robotaxis will be here by next year. With the most advanced chip (allegedly) integrated within for making precise decisions on road. With every individual car as a data center, the fleet will grow smarter every day. Zoox what?
@@no_alias_for_me well, he said that the Teslas already have radars and ultrasonic sensors which are more than enough for automated commutes on road. He doesn't have anything against LIDAR generally, as he uses LIDAR for SpaceX docking maneuvers because that is necessary there, not so much on the streets.
@@8BitKami I have high hopes for Tesla but a lot of the other companies trying for autonomous vehicles are just adding stuff to existing cars like an extension and these taxi services can get away with using geofencing to reduce the amount of processing power/neural net training required- do you think Tesla will be able to compete with these potentially lower cost cabs? I'm not sure what makes Tesla superior
@@Charlielinja Even Tesla is retrofitting the existing cars with new hardware and software as that is cheaper than building an entirely new infrastructure around the latest chip. I guess a company like Uber would be superior in this aspect (taxi service) as it already has a network and large amount of vehicles currently operating under it. Plus Uber is very reputed around the world. I would give Tesla an edge purely on their innovation. They might be new, but they are persistent and their proposed tech appears to be a par above anything on the streets right now. The neural net training that the Tesla fleet is undergoing, might just make automated driving in their cars unlike anything seen before.
@@8BitKami He said that LIDAR isn't necessary at all plus it's too expensive. "Everyone who uses LIDAR is doomed", that's what he said. He was talking about cars obviously.
Finally found them. I saw the test vehicles driving around San-Francisco two weeks ago. Was really curious what the sensors were for, I assumed they were for autonomous driving but I didn't expect them to have taken it this far! Thanks for featuring it!
I really don't understand all the mean comments below. These guys are just working hard trying to save time and maybe people with this project instead of you that just watch things on a screen. Shut up, we'll see how it will become in the future, then we'll judge. Everybody laughed at mobile devices when they came out and see where we are now, stop being skeptical
How u compare Mobile phone with this ?! ,,,, if u know how long companies trying to do self cars and then they gave up then u will keep ur mouth shut ,,, Google they are already have car it's been on the road for almost 7 years and no accident reported yet on that car and it has almost 1 million miles on it and they still don't trusted, , and u know how many tesla crash and killed cuz of this self care drive ,,, just shut up and go to work
metalica77 metalica First you mention googles successful car then trash Tesla's absolutely perfect system that has not resulted in a single death. Not one. The guy who died caused his death by human error. Teslas have in fact saved countless lives and are far better than any human being. Wtf is your comment? What idea of work could you have? You act like a child.
i laughed so hard when they mentioned that they weren't gonna use existing cars but build a new one, and then they show that mars rover LOL.. how does this compare to an autonomous tesla taxi?
Self driving cars will steal our freedom away. I like to drive. Now I think lane keep assist and adaptive cruise control are great. But self driving cars will be the end of freedom for billions of people. Not only will they have auto driving cars you will be required to use one and it will record everywhere you go, When you got there and who you were with and everything that was said in the vehicle. In fact they may make private cars illegal. You will only be able to use the government auto driving cars to go anywhere. NO THANK YOU! Driving is one my favorite things in the world. I love to drive and I love my freedom.
@@guidedmeditation2396 What even made you think they'll record who was in the car with you, what was being said etc. I own a Tesla and it's awesome, you can still switch between driving it or making it drive itself. Plus, self driving cars will have fewer accidents than actual people driving the cars. We're years away from a fully self-driving car anyways.
@@guidedmeditation2396 i expect public autonomous cars would record you but then its like when you have a taxi driver right? you could just have your own personal autonomous car if you really were particularly concerned about privacy
Guided Meditation No worries! Unless you were just born minutes ago, you & I will not be around to see it or worry about it! Remember driving is not a right, it’s a privilege & it’s a privilege that’s regulated by every state in the union, so if you want to protect the next generation of people who have your concerns, you better start contacting your state legislators & tell them that they have better make driving a right because it’s not now!
Actu Tesla Wow! So you wondered about that too! That was going to be my public reply to the video maker! There were so many questions that were not answered in this video, as they never talked about their financial/business model! They never talked about how they raised capital or about their financial health in terms of do they have actual cash on hand to pay employees for the next 5 to 10 years? And finally what exactly do they sell? So many questions left out of this video! So my money is on Tesla! Most experts say that Tesla maybe 2 to 3 years ahead of any potential competitor in terms of achieving full self driving automobiles! I bought my Tesla Model 3 back in 2018 & it still drives like I just drove it out of the show room! I don’t see any degradation in battery capacity and since I bought the car I mostly recharge the batteries using the super chargers, I should note that I don’t drive my car that much, I’d be lucky if I put 8000 miles on it in a year, because I’m retired & as the Colbert 19 virus is upon us I have greatly reduced the little driving that I do, but I’m absolutely thrilled to be driving the future because that’s exactly what Tesla is doing! They’re delivering the future, they’re not just talking about it, they’re not showing us concepts cars & having us imagining what the future is going to be, they’re actually delivering the future today & these other guys are playing catch-up! Now I hope & pray that somebody starts competing with Tesla because it’ll just make Tesla better, but so far I just haven’t seen anyone come close & that’s sad!😩
One thing that fascinated be about this video: At that green yield light the car mathematically could see its distance and speed it was tracking and figure how fast it would need to go to not get hit when crossing the lane of that on coming traffic but instead it chose to wait and see where the car goes and then to move through a completely empty lane of traffic. This could save lives and many accidents. Most crashes happen when acts merge into traffic or are crossing lanes of traffic to merge or at intersections. This really is the future of car safety
why are you just making stuff up? They had already input a destination and the car did not make a decision where to turn. That line you see is actually a z axis representation of the acceleration planned for the predetermined path. You can see a trail behind the car of data points for it's acceleration and yielding to the turing car. You're acting like the robot being able to see objects and compute basic kinematics is revolutionary, that's no different than its been for decades. your english kinda falls apart at the end so I have no idea what you think you are saying but I can assure you that you have no idea what you are talking about.
Depends who you are I guess. 30% of malls and main Street stores are predicted to close by 2023 and depending who you ask in Silicon Valley 50-85% of jobs will be automated by 2030. If you drive truck or work a til you'll probably be taking a automated cab to the welfare office.
Peter: And in the real world, technology can improve over time. Especially when you have a whole team of smart people working full time to improve it. Same as it ever was.
+Nacho TV The former CEO of GM has stated that when the number of accidents by humans vastly outnumbers the number of accidents by automated machines, THEN it will be mandated and required that humans no longer be the driver.
Used to live in Melbourne and when they said he was from Melbourne I was like... Wow, I might have met this guy! But, nope... still excited that he is Aussie though :D
I'm 27 and don't have a driving licence. People say it's because I'm lazy, but I'm just holding out a few more years for AI (...at least that's my argument).
"merging into that traffic would have been difficult even for a human driver" --- Maybe a grandma, but I'm pretty sure I drive faster than that when I merge onto the freeway
Yea that wasnt smooth at all. Looked like from the graph that the AI could have sped up and merged. Or if not then should have slowed in advance to time the merge correctly. Try driving like that in NYC lol
Aside from Bloomberg's goals/intentions, try to understand what those guys want to achieve compared to Tesla. Tesla is a car, your personal car which can/will drive you, without your intervention from and to your destination(s), then, you park it and it sits there waiting to take you home. Zoox, will be like a full autonomous taxi, no driver, no driver seat, no dashboard, not a single way for a human to "take manual control" ... just a "people carrying metal case on wheels". It will probably wait for orders, in special parking lots (can be underground, can be multilevel) it will come by its own when "summoned", even from miles away, take you where you need to go, then return to the closest station or pick up another ride. This truly has never been done before and is not Tesla's intention or business future to do so. Tesla sells cars for people (at least for now), this is something else, and they are ahead.
@@expertu Did you see the recent TESLA presentation? They mentioned having an option for TESLA owners to add their car to a fleet of autonomous uber style taxis. It's pretty awesome.
I saw this post and showed it to My landlord, out of joy he told me not to pay house rent for the rest of the year. I'm so happy, thank you so much for sharing this post
Have you heard about the Rolling Stone journalist who was investigating the head of the CIA and just happened to accidentally drive his rental Mercedes into a palm tree at over 100mph in suburban LA? Michael Hastings.
At 7:04 the vehicle is breaking way too late for a routine left turn by an oncoming vehicle. It does not apply the breaks until the vehicle is directly in front of it. Definitely not ready for a passenger to have a McDonald's coffee in her hand.
Ok, it drives by itself, right? Soooo, if I'm rip roaring drunk and the car is in self-drive....I'm technically NOT driving, hence I'm NOT drunk driving! Hmm? I'm starting to like self driving cars :)
An observation about the on ramp freeway test: The vehicle on the left slowed down and "stayed with you" to let you accelerate, not because it didn't know what to do, which was the program's or programmer's assumption. By breaking even more the autonomous vehicle could have caused an accident as cars behind either it or the car on the left could have rear ended either one of you. Most of the errors in programming are caused by programmers subconsciously thinking machines perform better than human thinking.
1. I wonder whether these systems would be more responsive in Internal Combustion Engines or Electrical Vehicles. To me , at least in my perception, ICE has a lot more variables that can hinder response time. 2. Granted more visual sensors, accelerometers, faster processing chips, better designed algorithm to handle non linear situations would compete with human response, and reflexes. So I get where this is all headed to. 3. And all that self driving , what is the point , other then economical to replace an actual driver ? Are they looking at real numbers in dollars to replace manpower ?
@Antonio Manaligod *Yeah. Like all the government agencies and big corporations around the world that have gotten hacked over the years weren't updating their systems.* *One thing about technology is this: nothing is 100% secure.*
Have you heard about the Rolling Stone journalist who was investigating the head of the CIA and just happened to accidentally drive his rental Mercedes into a palm tree at over 100mph in suburban LA? Michael Hastings.
@@theotherside931 again what's with the bold text. Around 20,000 to 40,000 people die from car accident in US every year. With millions of crash per year. I guess your attitude is to let these car accident fester and don't do anything about it. Sure someone can definately hack these and cause a bunch of death. But who will do that? A war between two big countries maybe? you be looking at total war where people are going to die anyway. If it is random hackers what will be their motivation? Just mischief? The fact remains that robots react better than humans and obey rules better than humans. If a certain high percentage of cars are autonomous it will be much more safer than a bunch of random assholes on the road. Jams and eta to destination will be more precise as well. Look at your TH-cam app, does it work 95 percent of the time, of course it does. But rmb 10 years ago TH-cam was hard to connected to right? Like people don't trust Internet shopping 10 years ago too. Look at how times have changed. There will be hick up along the way for autonomous driving but it is inevitable progress. Like online shopping there will be a time where people cheat the system people will fix the problem and then it will normalise eventually. Because the goal of these cars is to reduce traffic accidents. I trust a working machine more than the plenty of asshole drivers on the road. And as things stand now, I prefer safety on road than people being allowed to crash into each other.
Thats what radar and lidar are for. Radar works better than lidar in clear weather conditions, but lidar is more robust and more costly for extreme weather conditions (including fog).
If these guys are doing a sensor fusion of visible light, radar, and lidar, I can gaurantee they are not missing pedestrians. You saw how accurate their map was at detecting objects and labeling them right? This is pretty cutting edge stuff, and you have a right to worry about safety, but safety will always be the the number 1 priority from the engineers. The largest safety concern on this project will certainly be wireless security.
When merging onto Interstates it did not increase speed instead it slowly got on which can cause an accident behind it. Not a perfect merge, The robot needs to increase speed and merge in between cars and not be timid.
mixed emotion yeah I mean something as simple as a blind spot monitoring system on my car goes bezerk when it rains with false readings! I’d imagine even with fully automaticity driving cars, it will be some time before they remove the steering smwheel altogether. If there is bad weather, the systems will probably deactivate auto pilot and require manual take over until conditions improve
It will operate the same a human would If we teach it to, there's no real point in any of these opinions, asking all these what ifs, you can ask the same what ifs for people too. It will be safer in those conditions than any human in a heartbeat once we teach three conditions.
The robot uses visual, laser and LiDar for detection. Laser and LiDar are not affected by extreme weather conditions. I would say it drives better than humans in those conditions.
They could communicate 2 ways-ish. One would be they can react to what others are doing, a skill that they would need before all cars are autonomous, and another one would be they can communicate wireless, telling the other cars what that car is about to do.
6 years later they appointed a new ceo, sold the company to Amazon, , and are about the launch their first commercial service vehicle this summer. gotta say the company is off to great start.
With the future being primarily pedestrians, bicycles, and public mass transit, self-driving taxis (which do have a place in the post-work future) should be eventually tested in cities like Amsterdam.
As far as I have noticed, the companies that entered the market without too much media hype are the only ones that have succeeded. I have never seen media covering Uber and Tesla when they were in the beginning stage like Zoox.
"Self-driving car startup Zoox has selected its new CEO following the unexpected firing of co-founder and former CEO Tim Kentley-Klay" lol damn, sucks for him
Not sure you can call them "a self-driving car company" if they don't build any self-driving cars. Those donkey carts are cool, but they're not cars in any real sense. This should be a story about how any hipsters with a cool demo can find suckers to fund them.
Today is 29th of June 2020. We now know that self-driving software is extremely difficult, especially in a city, if there are no special lanes for self-driving cars.
I love the idea of autonomous cars, it will make my life so much easier. If they are not too expensive by the time they come out to market, I will buy one right away, in fact I started saving for it already....
No, it just looks like it with all these boxes around objects. An aimbot/esp/etc. always knows where the entities are and just highlights them. But yeah, it looks similar at least, I agree.
In the reality (actual streets), there are so many inputs like people, animals, weather conditions, and other elements which still can't be perfectly digested by the automation. It still takes another decade.
it will try to stop as efficiently as possible and or change the path in such a way that it tries to save the child without putting itself(the car and its occupants) in harm's way.
true..... what im illuding to is this though... hear me out. if the cars in a situation where it has no option but to crash, or hit a pedestrian, what will it choose? if a person jump out in front of the car, and the cars computer processes it as either hitting the person, or crashing into a car, guard rail, or going off the road what will it do? now we have machines, and AI making life or death decisions for us.... creepy
that would not work, hacking you'd have to be connected to the internet so other people would be able to access it. these systems are only within the car itself and even if it was connected. Drive systems and control systems are seperated from the internet
My first criminal thought was radar jamming + carjacking. Hacking will definitely be a crime regarding these cars, but it does require expertise. Any moron can use a jammer though--so for every 1 geek attacking the code there will be 10 high school dropouts trying with jammers and crowbars.
@@timesathousand even with radar jamming you still have a bunch of other sensors like ultra-sonic sensors, lidars, cameras, infared cameras, sonars and tons of other sensors. hacking these things is next to impossible and getting into their atonomous systems you legit have to break open the car and find the computer responible for navigation and other systems at that point you already broken the car. People are going to engineer these cars well reason why their called "smart" cars
Unfortunately it doesn’t work that way like movies depict systems like this. That’s one thing confusing because some things in movies actually can be done. But you couldn’t hack this system. It operates using real time sensors. With redundancy.
Beat Tesla? I just don't see it. Tesla has millions of miles of training on their AI already. I'm just not convinced a new startup can compete with Tesla, not even the big companies that have been in business for decades can even compete with Tesla's AI. Everyone is pretty much playing catch up at this point.
WOW!!! This is really promising. Can't wait to get one. I kept waiting for a typical NYC experience where you are rolling along in the robocar and some guy on a bike talking on his smartphone suddenly whizzes across your path, or a stray cat or having people along the obstacle course to see it maneuver around sudden movement by living things, a deer in the road, squirrels possums etc
Self driving cars are the future. Compared to the tens of thousands of car accidents each year in just solely America, there is massive applications and potential.
@@SA-zq7fz how is this "stealing" any job? The people producing the technology are employed and clearly more efficient at driving than existing human drivers are. Also, the people who die due to reckless human drivers aren't always those at fault.
@@willle8978 ? the company at best will have 5000 employees? you are displacing millions of drivers , truckers globally who also are efficient enough and plus this self driving will breed capitalism as companys will keep all profit which earlier was going into drivers pocket.
This company has the right idea. An autonomous car built from the ground up is the way to make them safe with better functionality. I'm still geeking out over the crab steering.
"As far as the public knows: Zoox, along with Waymo and GM Cruise, are the only companies capable to doing this kind of drive." This is such a ridiculous statement. Being dumb is not enough to say something so stupid. One has to be malicious. Oh, it is Bloomberg after all! No surprise here.
Let's see: 1) Zoox has 30 software programmers. Tesla has 1600 software programmers. 2) Zoox's core technology started using Tesla's Autopilot technology shared by Elon. 3) Tesla taught Nvidia how to make better AI Chips. Zoox uses Nvidia AI chips. 4) Zoox has ten cars in a non-real world environment. Tesla has millions of self-driving cars operating in the real world. 5) Tesla has four Gigafactories. Zoox operates from a small garage. So, nope! Try again.
Isn’t this the company under investigation for stealing technology from Tesla? The answer is yes.
Atlien4eva3000 didnt elon musk say all his patents are being shared lol
@@greenthizzle4 Yes because stealing intellectual property is allowed. Who needs to register their reasons and uses to the intellectual property owner/company before taking the assets first right?
Add859 TankiOnline I mean it doesn’t matter. Elon made the patents public for the betterment of the world, because he actually cares and doesn’t just pretend to.
@@stormsurge1850 Key word "for the betterment of the world" now how are you going to know what people are going to do with teslas assets/patents? Maybe they will use it for nefarious purposes!
@@greenthizzle4 he never said "ALL" of Teslas patents are being shared, one word makes a BIG difference
Just got bought out by Amazon, this is taking off for real.
No they are not taking off for real. They got bought by Amazon. Whether they take off or not will be based on what cars actually use this.
In 2018, they were valued at $3.2 billion and last year around 6. But amazon got them only for 1.2 so it doesn't look like they r taking off or even close to that!
mahesh masale Only 1.2 billion huh. only. ha
@Curious Mind Jeff just has beef with Elon , it's the second time Elon calls him a copy cat
may be amazon will use it for delivery. JK. competition is healthy for us.
I am more interested, how did they get 800 million of investment.
Ikr, same
i was thinking the same thing
Finally I get a person noticing about the 800 mil lol. I mean with only 6 people and first gen prototype....
they are called investors..
When you find out, go get some of your own...
I wonder how these perform in different weather conditions. Rain, Snow, etc. Most of these tests have been in near perfect weather conditions.
prospect: That's one reason this kind of thing is only level 4 at this point. Level 5 will be all weather and any location. ALL this stuff is VERY far from that. I predict some limited L4 systems like the Uber cabs in part of Tempe, AZ, and the Mobileye plans for a Jerusalem cab service, which will slowly spread out and get better, but be strictly geofenced and somewhat weather constrained for a long time.
What I want to know is what the car does in the wrong situation. What about emulating driving when a car swerveds in the lane while it also detects an 18wheeler behind it. So that is 2 calculations to make and at what point does the car know that an impact might happen to deploy.
That's why you still don't see them running around our neighborhood.
I fail to see how this is any more advanced or significantly different from it's competitors.
exactly LOL
The way the vehicle can move because of its 4 wheel steering.
@@dannyjackson1331 didnt notice that! Very true
Uh golf carts? Duh
Eh Teslas have crashed and have to pay extra if u want it to drive itself.
something tells me that once developed, Amazon's gonna try hard to buy this
Edit: I said Amazon specifically because that's what Bezos has done all these years, he just buys something (store or anything) and then scales it so that it reaches everyone (except the original bookstore, he built that)
Chaitanya Singh it wont be hard for them. Amazon is ballin
No no no... They won't try... They will just buy lol
800m raised? They don't need Amazon
Give up a share on autonomous car market? That's a stupid idea to give up on a growing market
Frankly, the 1%-ers will get involved and finance fleets of vehicles in a given area. The winners of the tech war will just lobby to these syndicates and the world will go on. Its doubtful that governements will get involded in public taxis ecept to charge them for road fees.
The first 3 seconds of this video summarizes the entire Zoox company. LOL
lol 😂
4:52 tinder but a ring on the finger :------)
sharp eyes huh.
Spotted lol 😂😂
haha bro your eyes are 10/10 😂😂
My man has been cheating😬😂😂
Wow LOL
Tesla Robotaxis will be here by next year. With the most advanced chip (allegedly) integrated within for making precise decisions on road. With every individual car as a data center, the fleet will grow smarter every day.
Zoox what?
Elon even said that LIDAR apparently is the biggest fail ever.
@@no_alias_for_me well, he said that the Teslas already have radars and ultrasonic sensors which are more than enough for automated commutes on road. He doesn't have anything against LIDAR generally, as he uses LIDAR for SpaceX docking maneuvers because that is necessary there, not so much on the streets.
@@8BitKami I have high hopes for Tesla but a lot of the other companies trying for autonomous vehicles are just adding stuff to existing cars like an extension and these taxi services can get away with using geofencing to reduce the amount of processing power/neural net training required- do you think Tesla will be able to compete with these potentially lower cost cabs? I'm not sure what makes Tesla superior
@@Charlielinja Even Tesla is retrofitting the existing cars with new hardware and software as that is cheaper than building an entirely new infrastructure around the latest chip.
I guess a company like Uber would be superior in this aspect (taxi service) as it already has a network and large amount of vehicles currently operating under it. Plus Uber is very reputed around the world.
I would give Tesla an edge purely on their innovation. They might be new, but they are persistent and their proposed tech appears to be a par above anything on the streets right now. The neural net training that the Tesla fleet is undergoing, might just make automated driving in their cars unlike anything seen before.
@@8BitKami He said that LIDAR isn't necessary at all plus it's too expensive. "Everyone who uses LIDAR is doomed", that's what he said. He was talking about cars obviously.
Finally found them. I saw the test vehicles driving around San-Francisco two weeks ago. Was really curious what the sensors were for, I assumed they were for autonomous driving but I didn't expect them to have taken it this far! Thanks for featuring it!
I really don't understand all the mean comments below. These guys are just working hard trying to save time and maybe people with this project instead of you that just watch things on a screen. Shut up, we'll see how it will become in the future, then we'll judge.
Everybody laughed at mobile devices when they came out and see where we are now, stop being skeptical
Just like the spinning jenny was?
There will always be new jobs.
Everybody laughed at the mouse's invention, now we depend on it.
How u compare Mobile phone with this ?! ,,,, if u know how long companies trying to do self cars and then they gave up then u will keep ur mouth shut ,,, Google they are already have car it's been on the road for almost 7 years and no accident reported yet on that car and it has almost 1 million miles on it and they still don't trusted, , and u know how many tesla crash and killed cuz of this self care drive ,,, just shut up and go to work
metalica77 metalica
First you mention googles successful car then trash Tesla's absolutely perfect system that has not resulted in a single death. Not one. The guy who died caused his death by human error. Teslas have in fact saved countless lives and are far better than any human being. Wtf is your comment? What idea of work could you have? You act like a child.
Don't you know, it's cool to be like everyone else and repost practically the same hateful comment over and over? 😂
i laughed so hard when they mentioned that they weren't gonna use existing cars but build a new one, and then they show that mars rover LOL.. how does this compare to an autonomous tesla taxi?
It’s cheaper and the completed version will obviously look different.
Are you seriously that dense? It's a prototype test mule.
It doesn't, its just type of company made to be sold.
@@kronikinsomniak i think the point was tesla is already blowing these people out of the water in terms of progress
Seriously, every Tesla vehicle already has the potential to drive autonomously
The ending was brilliant !
BlastYourMind the ending made my eyes cross
Why don’t they even mention Tesla, indisputable leader in this area?
Self driving cars will steal our freedom away. I like to drive. Now I think lane keep assist and adaptive cruise control are great. But self driving cars will be the end of freedom for billions of people. Not only will they have auto driving cars you will be required to use one and it will record everywhere you go, When you got there and who you were with and everything that was said in the vehicle. In fact they may make private cars illegal. You will only be able to use the government auto driving cars to go anywhere. NO THANK YOU! Driving is one my favorite things in the world. I love to drive and I love my freedom.
@@guidedmeditation2396
What even made you think they'll record who was in the car with you, what was being said etc. I own a Tesla and it's awesome, you can still switch between driving it or making it drive itself. Plus, self driving cars will have fewer accidents than actual people driving the cars. We're years away from a fully self-driving car anyways.
@@guidedmeditation2396 i expect public autonomous cars would record you but then its like when you have a taxi driver right? you could just have your own personal autonomous car if you really were particularly concerned about privacy
Guided Meditation No worries! Unless you were just born minutes ago, you & I will not be around to see it or worry about it! Remember driving is not a right, it’s a privilege & it’s a privilege that’s regulated by every state in the union, so if you want to protect the next generation of people who have your concerns, you better start contacting your state legislators & tell them that they have better make driving a right because it’s not now!
Actu Tesla Wow! So you wondered about that too! That was going to be my public reply to the video maker! There were so many questions that were not answered in this video, as they never talked about their financial/business model! They never talked about how they raised capital or about their financial health in terms of do they have actual cash on hand to pay employees for the next 5 to 10 years? And finally what exactly do they sell? So many questions left out of this video! So my money is on Tesla! Most experts say that Tesla maybe 2 to 3 years ahead of any potential competitor in terms of achieving full self driving automobiles! I bought my Tesla Model 3 back in 2018 & it still drives like I just drove it out of the show room! I don’t see any degradation in battery capacity and since I bought the car I mostly recharge the batteries using the super chargers, I should note that I don’t drive my car that much, I’d be lucky if I put 8000 miles on it in a year, because I’m retired & as the Colbert 19 virus is upon us I have greatly reduced the little driving that I do, but I’m absolutely thrilled to be driving the future because that’s exactly what Tesla is doing! They’re delivering the future, they’re not just talking about it, they’re not showing us concepts cars & having us imagining what the future is going to be, they’re actually delivering the future today & these other guys are playing catch-up! Now I hope & pray that somebody starts competing with Tesla because it’ll just make Tesla better, but so far I just haven’t seen anyone come close & that’s sad!😩
Wow, going the speed limit in the left lane. Who knew ai would be assholes
One thing that fascinated be about this video: At that green yield light the car mathematically could see its distance and speed it was tracking and figure how fast it would need to go to not get hit when crossing the lane of that on coming traffic but instead it chose to wait and see where the car goes and then to move through a completely empty lane of traffic. This could save lives and many accidents. Most crashes happen when acts merge into traffic or are crossing lanes of traffic to merge or at intersections. This really is the future of car safety
why are you just making stuff up? They had already input a destination and the car did not make a decision where to turn.
That line you see is actually a z axis representation of the acceleration planned for the predetermined path. You can see a trail behind the car of data points for it's acceleration and yielding to the turing car.
You're acting like the robot being able to see objects and compute basic kinematics is revolutionary, that's no different than its been for decades.
your english kinda falls apart at the end so I have no idea what you think you are saying but I can assure you that you have no idea what you are talking about.
Would Al Robotics takeover our jobs, before driving us to them...
so far the best comment i've seen on this video 👏
Depends who you are I guess. 30% of malls and main Street stores are predicted to close by 2023 and depending who you ask in Silicon Valley 50-85% of jobs will be automated by 2030. If you drive truck or work a til you'll probably be taking a automated cab to the welfare office.
right
and one day kill us... non-deterministic algorithms.... welcome to reality..
ANDREW YANG 2020
Wonderful Company and Video about it! Exceptionally well made! Subscribed! More of this type of coverage, please!!
nothing wonderfull about taking freedom away.
Lol dude had tinder on his phone 4:56 my man
Alan McLeod Don’t spoil his game !
He has a wedding ring on too... O.O
🤣🤣🤣
@@rexbarr_5783 l.m.f.a.o
That's simply another "research project" he's working on
That was a critical point on the drivers test accelerate as you get on the freeway.
Peter: And in the real world, technology can improve over time. Especially when you have a whole team of smart people working full time to improve it. Same as it ever was.
Once robotic cars take over..will they no longer allow regular cars?
probably not, because there will always be car enthusiasts and NASCAR drivers that like to race
+Nacho TV
The majority of countries have already passed laws banning gas and/or diesel vehicles by 2020.
+Nacho TV
The former CEO of GM has stated that when the number of accidents by humans vastly outnumbers the number of accidents by automated machines, THEN it will be mandated and required that humans no longer be the driver.
Do u see a lot of horse carriages on the road these days?
the majority ? where did you get that from ?
Wow! As an Australian I am really inspired and excited about the future of Zoox
Frost same
in australia . do you drive the cars on the roof or are they upside down like the rest?
We don't drive cars we ride Kangaroos which is why this is such a cool company
Used to live in Melbourne and when they said he was from Melbourne I was like... Wow, I might have met this guy! But, nope... still excited that he is Aussie though :D
I wouldn't be too inspired. Tim Kentley-Klay, the Australian co-founder of Zoox was fired by the board a month after this video was released.
Love that their workers get Mirra chairs.. they are worth about 1k AUD and are comfy AF :)
I'm 27 and don't have a driving licence. People say it's because I'm lazy, but I'm just holding out a few more years for AI (...at least that's my argument).
lmao
ur gonna be that one guy that doesn't know how to drive a car.
You’re just lazy
"merging into that traffic would have been difficult even for a human driver" --- Maybe a grandma, but I'm pretty sure I drive faster than that when I merge onto the freeway
Tambrein Bates but still better than the people who can’t drive!
@C Burgess umm then the car behind you is at fault...what is your point exactly?
@C Burgess oh my apologies i thought you where being snarky. you where just genuinely curious. my b.
Yea that wasnt smooth at all. Looked like from the graph that the AI could have sped up and merged. Or if not then should have slowed in advance to time the merge correctly. Try driving like that in NYC lol
While everyone's discussing about the product's imperfections, the developers are making necessary adjustments to make the program better.
They didn't even mention tesla which has by far the most advanced fully self driven cars without all these ugly parts
Bloomberg's primary goal isn't news, its to manipulate stock prices. Dumb episodes like this make more sense after that part clicks.
Aside from Bloomberg's goals/intentions, try to understand what those guys want to achieve compared to Tesla. Tesla is a car, your personal car which can/will drive you, without your intervention from and to your destination(s), then, you park it and it sits there waiting to take you home. Zoox, will be like a full autonomous taxi, no driver, no driver seat, no dashboard, not a single way for a human to "take manual control" ... just a "people carrying metal case on wheels". It will probably wait for orders, in special parking lots (can be underground, can be multilevel) it will come by its own when "summoned", even from miles away, take you where you need to go, then return to the closest station or pick up another ride. This truly has never been done before and is not Tesla's intention or business future to do so. Tesla sells cars for people (at least for now), this is something else, and they are ahead.
@@expertu Did you see the recent TESLA presentation? They mentioned having an option for TESLA owners to add their car to a fleet of autonomous uber style taxis. It's pretty awesome.
*rip*
@@pubbets7290 And it's literally called Robotaxi
How will Zoox respond in the event of an ambulance on its tail?
mealex mailex how about during a heavy thunderstorm?
Looks like Tesla just crashed y'all's party
I saw this post and showed it to My landlord, out of joy he told me not to pay house rent for the rest of the year. I'm so happy, thank you so much for sharing this post
How?
Imagine takin a trip in this robo and starts rainin lol
Desi Records bring a umbrella
These are prototypes used for testings, the completed version would be an actual car dumbass
@Theify you can't be serious
Anyone else hoping for the Mythbusters to parachute out of the sky when they mentioned Alameda Naval Air Station?
7:02 Accident saved...but the SUV has to stop as soon we see any car pass by..!
I wonder how this could handle NYC, as in where street lights aren’t enough, and traffic officers are needed as redundant measures to control traffic
Had no idea, that’s awesome!
Have you heard about the Rolling Stone journalist who was investigating the head of the CIA and just happened to accidentally drive his rental Mercedes into a palm tree at over 100mph in suburban LA? Michael Hastings.
Damn!
At 7:04 the vehicle is breaking way too late for a routine left turn by an oncoming vehicle. It does not apply the breaks until the vehicle is directly in front of it.
Definitely not ready for a passenger to have a McDonald's coffee in her hand.
Ok, it drives by itself, right?
Soooo, if I'm rip roaring drunk and the car is in self-drive....I'm technically NOT driving, hence I'm NOT drunk driving!
Hmm? I'm starting to like self driving cars :)
Anddd you can sleep in your car while “driving” to work! The future is awesome!
Tesla really out here like Hold My beer 🍺 LMFAO
Anyone came here after hearing Amazon is onboard with this
4:54 - My biggest question: why does this guy who has a wedding ring on have Tinder on his phone!? Lol
ModelFyre the interviewer is the one holding the phone, and is married.
Don’t spoil his game !
I like how it has lights and everything on the front and back so it can just reverse the way it goes and be street ready either way.
Where are they now. Talking about overtaking Tesla.
"They can drive without any human intervention" Has a human drive the car out of a tight spot.
Robotic Autonomous Transportation
RAT
“Ima summon a RAT”
An observation about the on ramp freeway test: The vehicle on the left slowed down and "stayed with you" to let you accelerate, not because it didn't know what to do, which was the program's or programmer's assumption. By breaking even more the autonomous vehicle could have caused an accident as cars behind either it or the car on the left could have rear ended either one of you. Most of the errors in programming are caused by programmers subconsciously thinking machines perform better than human thinking.
self driving still seems like it needs work. It brakes so suddenly and cant tell signals when cars are turning and it can go.
Remember that scene from fast and furious when the hacker made all those computer cars drive off the building
Mr SS .no ..because I've never heard of that movie
Lol
5:04 "We don't know any other company that is driving that multi dimensional degree of difficulty" Umm how about TESLA?
No? Tesla is not auto driving yet.
Waymo is already doing this with an operating fleet of 600 vehicles in Phoenix.
1. I wonder whether these systems would be more responsive in Internal Combustion Engines or Electrical Vehicles. To me , at least in my perception, ICE has a lot more variables that can hinder response time.
2. Granted more visual sensors, accelerometers, faster processing chips, better designed algorithm to handle non linear situations would compete with human response, and reflexes. So I get where this is all headed to.
3. And all that self driving , what is the point , other then economical to replace an actual driver ? Are they looking at real numbers in dollars to replace manpower ?
*One day, hackers will sit behind computer desks and be causing cars 1000 miles away to crash.*
@Antonio Manaligod *Yeah. Like all the government agencies and big corporations around the world that have gotten hacked over the years weren't updating their systems.*
*One thing about technology is this: nothing is 100% secure.*
@@theotherside931 What's up with the bold text?
Have you heard about the Rolling Stone journalist who was investigating the head of the CIA and just happened to accidentally drive his rental Mercedes into a palm tree at over 100mph in suburban LA? Michael Hastings.
@@samd1405 *Wasn't he the guy the CIA ruined his life and he ended up committing suicide cause he investigated the Iranian Contra War?*
@@theotherside931 again what's with the bold text. Around 20,000 to 40,000 people die from car accident in US every year. With millions of crash per year. I guess your attitude is to let these car accident fester and don't do anything about it.
Sure someone can definately hack these and cause a bunch of death. But who will do that? A war between two big countries maybe? you be looking at total war where people are going to die anyway. If it is random hackers what will be their motivation? Just mischief?
The fact remains that robots react better than humans and obey rules better than humans. If a certain high percentage of cars are autonomous it will be much more safer than a bunch of random assholes on the road. Jams and eta to destination will be more precise as well. Look at your TH-cam app, does it work 95 percent of the time, of course it does. But rmb 10 years ago TH-cam was hard to connected to right?
Like people don't trust Internet shopping 10 years ago too. Look at how times have changed.
There will be hick up along the way for autonomous driving but it is inevitable progress. Like online shopping there will be a time where people cheat the system people will fix the problem and then it will normalise eventually.
Because the goal of these cars is to reduce traffic accidents. I trust a working machine more than the plenty of asshole drivers on the road. And as things stand now, I prefer safety on road than people being allowed to crash into each other.
But do the cameras work as well during night time in detecting oncoming pedestrians who may be jaywalking at any point
Thats what radar and lidar are for. Radar works better than lidar in clear weather conditions, but lidar is more robust and more costly for extreme weather conditions (including fog).
If these guys are doing a sensor fusion of visible light, radar, and lidar, I can gaurantee they are not missing pedestrians. You saw how accurate their map was at detecting objects and labeling them right? This is pretty cutting edge stuff, and you have a right to worry about safety, but safety will always be the the number 1 priority from the engineers. The largest safety concern on this project will certainly be wireless security.
That crabwalk was freakin cool, I cant wait to see this
Now it is 2021, can anyone tell what is their update?
When merging onto Interstates it did not increase speed instead it slowly got on which can cause an accident behind it. Not a perfect merge, The robot needs to increase speed and merge in between cars and not be timid.
Wait doesn't tesla do this with like their auto pilot?
"with like their auto pilot?"
Try in rainy days. Fog. Winds.
mixed emotion yeah I mean something as simple as a blind spot monitoring system on my car goes bezerk when it rains with false readings! I’d imagine even with fully automaticity driving cars, it will be some time before they remove the steering smwheel altogether. If there is bad weather, the systems will probably deactivate auto pilot and require manual take over until conditions improve
They test in all conditions and often times the systems perform much better than humans in inclimate weather!
in the future ..the roads themselves would be equipped with sensors to help AI cars..so stop thinking to hard
It will operate the same a human would If we teach it to, there's no real point in any of these opinions, asking all these what ifs, you can ask the same what ifs for people too. It will be safer in those conditions than any human in a heartbeat once we teach three conditions.
The robot uses visual, laser and LiDar for detection. Laser and LiDar are not affected by extreme weather conditions. I would say it drives better than humans in those conditions.
Ai is being trained on how a human would drive but if every car would become a self automated car how would they react to each other?
They could communicate 2 ways-ish. One would be they can react to what others are doing, a skill that they would need before all cars are autonomous, and another one would be they can communicate wireless, telling the other cars what that car is about to do.
@@mapl3bac0n68 I am btw not hating on this I love new tech its part of my job.
6 years later they appointed a new ceo, sold the company to Amazon, , and are about the launch their first commercial service vehicle this summer. gotta say the company is off to great start.
Test these in India. If the AI can manoeuvre through that traffic, they can drive anywhere.
I love how tesla and other ev technology coming out with different innovations, i think its awesome
Exactly what caught my ears.
Watching this two years later and this doesn’t exist while Tesla is travelling out in space.
they do a great job driving between the red cones like a 16 boy getting his license i'm sold
With the future being primarily pedestrians, bicycles, and public mass transit, self-driving taxis (which do have a place in the post-work future) should be eventually tested in cities like Amsterdam.
As far as I have noticed, the companies that entered the market without too much media hype are the only ones that have succeeded. I have never seen media covering Uber and Tesla when they were in the beginning stage like Zoox.
"Self-driving car startup Zoox has selected its new CEO following the unexpected firing of co-founder and former CEO Tim Kentley-Klay" lol damn, sucks for him
Jayson Power who's kentley?
Not sure you can call them "a self-driving car company" if they don't build any self-driving cars. Those donkey carts are cool, but they're not cars in any real sense. This should be a story about how any hipsters with a cool demo can find suckers to fund them.
04:00 that's something I'd expect from a robot.
theres no point in ANY of this sh*t if the savings from not having to pay an actual driver arent being passed on to the consumer!
Today is 29th of June 2020. We now know that self-driving software is extremely difficult, especially in a city, if there are no special lanes for self-driving cars.
It's 2022 where are they now?? Another overpromising start up??
Imagine if these get hacked into and someone alters your destination
Commander: Imagine encryption.
Yeah, best to not think about Tesla. Bloomberg pikers.
I love the idea of autonomous cars, it will make my life so much easier. If they are not too expensive by the time they come out to market, I will buy one right away, in fact I started saving for it already....
Keep saving 💀
7:02 - you gotta trust this thing 😂
The software is literally what aimbot use for detecting another player in a FPS game lol
No, it just looks like it with all these boxes around objects. An aimbot/esp/etc. always knows where the entities are and just highlights them. But yeah, it looks similar at least, I agree.
Finally, I live in the future!
no, you live in the present.
Of course he has tinder! He’s in robotics
He also has no job. He was fired by the company board about a month after this video was released.
Who are you talking about?
@@jpmorgan187 4:52
@@missingMBR why?
I've already forgotten the name of the last 100 electric concept cars that were 'definitely' going to go into mass production to beat Tesla.
In the reality (actual streets), there are so many inputs like people, animals, weather conditions, and other elements which still can't be perfectly digested by the automation. It still takes another decade.
wha if a kid jumps in front of the car, does it avoid the kid and crash or hit her and save the occupants?
it will try to stop as efficiently as possible and or change the path in such a way that it tries to save the child without putting itself(the car and its occupants) in harm's way.
true..... what im illuding to is this though... hear me out. if the cars in a situation where it has no option but to crash, or hit a pedestrian, what will it choose? if a person jump out in front of the car, and the cars computer processes it as either hitting the person, or crashing into a car, guard rail, or going off the road what will it do? now we have machines, and AI making life or death decisions for us.... creepy
What will a human do that's better?
It will do as it is programmed to do.
Damien Green the point is your letting ai decide who lives for you... You guus are naive
How can this tech stand against unpredictable situation when someone is driving with a blinker and decide not to turn?
better than a human...
These will reduce crashes because they have more than 2 eyes but will bring new threats such as hacking. Future is here :DDD
that would not work, hacking you'd have to be connected to the internet so other people would be able to access it. these systems are only within the car itself and even if it was connected. Drive systems and control systems are seperated from the internet
My first criminal thought was radar jamming + carjacking. Hacking will definitely be a crime regarding these cars, but it does require expertise. Any moron can use a jammer though--so for every 1 geek attacking the code there will be 10 high school dropouts trying with jammers and crowbars.
@@timesathousand even with radar jamming you still have a bunch of other sensors like ultra-sonic sensors, lidars, cameras, infared cameras, sonars and tons of other sensors. hacking these things is next to impossible and getting into their atonomous systems you legit have to break open the car and find the computer responible for navigation and other systems at that point you already broken the car. People are going to engineer these cars well reason why their called "smart" cars
Klab lol. Youre naive.
Unfortunately it doesn’t work that way like movies depict systems like this. That’s one thing confusing because some things in movies actually can be done. But you couldn’t hack this system. It operates using real time sensors. With redundancy.
Beat Tesla? I just don't see it. Tesla has millions of miles of training on their AI already. I'm just not convinced a new startup can compete with Tesla, not even the big companies that have been in business for decades can even compete with Tesla's AI. Everyone is pretty much playing catch up at this point.
WOW!!! This is really promising. Can't wait to get one. I kept waiting for a typical NYC experience where you are rolling along in the robocar and some guy on a bike talking on his smartphone suddenly whizzes across your path, or a stray cat or having people along the obstacle course to see it maneuver around sudden movement by living things, a deer in the road, squirrels possums etc
Great execution, that will put a lot of drivers out of work.
So it's really coming, Yang 2020!
Trump is winning by a mile
Best soundtrack ever..
hey?? honestly, I scrolled down the comment section to see if anyone noticed too!
Not even the jet radar work perfectly during the snow or rain conditions. I wonder how they are going to approach that issue?
You absolutely cannot do 4 wheel steering lane changes on the highway because it will screw up people who are driving manually.
ya know what, just live near your work.
Self driving cars are the future. Compared to the tens of thousands of car accidents each year in just solely America, there is massive applications and potential.
so you are willing to steal jobs of millions of drivers just because 10k people coud'nt drive?
@@SA-zq7fz how is this "stealing" any job? The people producing the technology are employed and clearly more efficient at driving than existing human drivers are. Also, the people who die due to reckless human drivers aren't always those at fault.
@@willle8978 ? the company at best will have 5000 employees? you are displacing millions of drivers , truckers globally who also are efficient enough and plus this self driving will breed capitalism as companys will keep all profit which earlier was going into drivers pocket.
TOYOTA AUTONOMOUS cars would be great
This company has the right idea. An autonomous car built from the ground up is the way to make them safe with better functionality. I'm still geeking out over the crab steering.
"As far as the public knows: Zoox, along with Waymo and GM Cruise, are the only companies capable to doing this kind of drive."
This is such a ridiculous statement. Being dumb is not enough to say something so stupid. One has to be malicious.
Oh, it is Bloomberg after all! No surprise here.
Couldn’t agree more. 👍🏼
current tesla can do 90% if not 100% of what these cars are doing
We're now entering the new era of technology. This is the future!
Andrew yang is the only candidate who understands this...
Let's see:
1) Zoox has 30 software programmers. Tesla has 1600 software programmers.
2) Zoox's core technology started using Tesla's Autopilot technology shared by Elon.
3) Tesla taught Nvidia how to make better AI Chips. Zoox uses Nvidia AI chips.
4) Zoox has ten cars in a non-real world environment. Tesla has millions of self-driving cars operating in the real world.
5) Tesla has four Gigafactories. Zoox operates from a small garage.
So, nope! Try again.
This is the way of the future. 30 years from now, your kids will be saying "Wow, you use to drive your car yourself?" Lol
VERY impressive! THis Zoox tech can be used on both existing and proprietary vehicles -- big upside!
Doubt it! That car is heavily modified....