@@Cat-y4w Why would they do that lol? If you need more realistic plane physics - go play Microsoft Flight Sim instead. GTA is in no way a realistic game lmao
@@Byclops5712He meant that the in-game model was a disrespect to the real AN-225 due to the sheer number of inaccuracies. Obviously this was not a great joke, since the plane isn’t really based on the AN-225. However, he most likely did not mean that the irl plane’s destruction was what was disrespected.
this might sound really nerdy and stuck up but fuck it, the reason the devs make the vehicles in game look different to the ones IRL is for cooyright reasons. They own the rights to the design of the vehicle so making a model of it in a video game without their permission would be a breach on copyright law.
This is where you get people who are obsessed over things do this. "Why does that car look like a Ferrari but is called a cheetah?" "Why does that A10 look like that?" Idk maybe because Rockstar doesn't want to pay copyrights to over 100+ Real world cars and aircraft. Could you imagine asking Lockheed Martin or Boeing to see if you can have their aircraft in the game. Don't get me wrong, I love GTA's aircraft and I totally get why they don't look realistic, but R* isn't going to spend the next 2-3 years detailing their vehicles to suit people's likes. If you want a real world aircraft, Get a Mod!.
Yhea im annoyed that so many of these are just that they are not acurate to what they are based of. Like yhea its bot supposed to be exactly the same thats why they have different names
Ik this is late but you mention they have no liscense but how can you explain the avenger has an almost identical exterior to the Bell Boeing MV-22. They just lazy ong
Most of rockstars planes are planes mixed in, like the b52 engines on the 225 or the lazer having a twin tail instead of the singular tail. It’s a creative idea but they put little detail into it
@@LunarMARAUDERIt’s not a problem? The idea is not to make direct copies of vehicles and to rather take inspiration from many to both make a lore-friendly car that fills a wide niche and to avoid trademark infringement.
5:06 It's a MiG-17. The MiG-19 was a supersonic twinjet while the 17 was single-engined. Actually, it appears to have the fuselage of a MiG-15 with the wings of a MiG-17. Cursed as shit. 6:20 That's a radial engine; rotary engines haven't really been used since WW1
I suggest you look up what rotary engine actually is. Its not the wankel engine you are thinking of. Its basically a radial but block spins and crankshaft remains stationary. Thats the only difference to radial engines.
@@escapetarkov3838 no, type rotary engine to google. You are running a wankel engine shop and you dont even know what actual rotary engines are, really? You really should look up what the definition of rotary engine is, wiki has a good article on it :)
I counted only 12 sins and they were for either repeated cockpits, seating capacity errors, car doors, and design issues (alkonost short landing gear for example) Mixture of designs from different planes to avoid legal issues shouldn’t be counted as sins.
Woulda preferred this video if it was actually pointing out things actually wrong with the aircraft mainly, instead of pointing out how they are different with their real life counterparts, theyre meant to be different
@@SpidaMezthen maybe don’t count differences to irl counterparts as sins, as it’s just rockstar trying to avoid getting sued. Not hating, just constructive criticism.
@@wettoaster34 And because it's interesting to see how they manage to mix different parts of different cars into a coherent design that's still recognizable. Recently Rockstar has gone closer to copying real-life car designs, but there's still an original flair to them that I like. It would be incredibly boring if GTA was just another "real car advertisement" game.
The Hydra actually takes more inspiration from Avpro's super Harrier proposal, an upgrade for the british harrier that includes a JSF stealth, jump jet design that gives the aircraft, another verticle stabiliser and has a low RCS, blended fuselage-nozzle type that provides afterburner, and can carry 4 more missiles underneath it's belly. It's an unorthodox design, but it is a way better JSF design proposal upgrade than the F-35's design.
The aircraft don't look identical on purpose.... would of preferred if you spoke about stuff like the flaws with their GTA designs instead of 'sinning' it for not completely copying it. I don't think GTA is your type of game if you only play for the vehicles and you only like vehicles identical to real life
The nimbus isn't at all based off the longitude . It's primarily based off the Cessna citation X . And a mix of the Embraer Praetor 600(cockpit windows)
Addendum: the Shamal’s instrument cluster displays the pitch and yaw incorrectly, being flipped for some reason. The Alkanost’s wings, despite clearly having the slotting and mechanism for it, are not able to sweep to the rear position like the Tu-160.
4:52 surprisingly, Rockstar got the interior correct for the RJ contrary to what is mentioned in the video. Most regional carriers such as SkyWest and Air Wisconsin that operate(or used to operate) the 200 ran them in 2-2 configs.Some carriers may have a few in a 2-1 configuration, but I believe you may have mixed up the interior description with the slightly narrower ERJ-135/140/145 which is run in a 2-1 configuration.
Having been stuffed in many CRJ2s, I can say with confidence they are a 2-2 configuration in RJ service, although a very uncomfortable 2-2 configuration.
2:50 The Cargoplane is more based on the An-124, not the 225. This makes the amount of engines still too much, but the vertical stabilizer and the missing humps wouldn't be a mistake
1. It's called a rudder, not a yaw. Yaw is the movement of the aircraft, not the control surface 2. Not all stalls lead to spins, a spin is an uncoordinated stall 3. The C172S has landing lights on both wings 4. Older C172 variants have landing lights behind the propeller
no the mig 17 has a different tail, the tail that is on the game is the exact tail that is on the mig 19 even thought the color is really matching the mig 17
The designs are different from real life to avoid copyright issues because they don't have license to use real airplane models in their games. 1:34 Idk if the registration is too long or not. 2:06 I'm surprised you didn't put a sin on the fact that the instrument panel of the 747 in the game is too simple and is suited for light training planes and modern airline jets have glass cockpit. This jet doesn't even have a PFD, MFD and autopilot. The Cargo Plane's cockpit is more modern and accurate for modern airliners. 2:28 "The Hydra or Lazer is obviously based on Harrier in real life" those two are different jets. 5:39 I like that you put a note that the lights on the left wing are for newer models of Cessna 172 since older models like 172M has lights like where the Mammatus' lights are 7:05 Better if it's FBI instead of Lockheed Martin. Anyway, I like that part to poke at the reference to classified information I like how Rockstar gave Alkonost stealth capabilities which will activate after reaching a certain altitude and above. The TU-160 was designed for reduced detectability to both radar and infrared signature, but it's not a stealth aircraft. The biggest sins should be Rockstar making the Cargo Plane unobtainable in free mode singleplayer and making it and the 747 unobtainable in free roam in Online, not to mention the Cargo Plane's turbine blades rotate despite being unobtainable while most obtainable jets have turbine blades which do not rotate. Is it too much for them to allow us to fly those planes in free roam in Online and the Cargo Plane in free mode in Singleplayer?
I was expecting a critique of Trevor attempting to land a massive cargo plane at Mckenzie Air Field or how Devon Weston's jet was still doing pre flight checklist while there's an active police chase going on right outside
1:19 Now, I'm an all time 747 fan so I'm here to point out some mistakes you didn't point out: -The nose landing gear doors are way too long compared to the real life plane -The windows are a little bit too small -The front section of the plane is just too smooth compared to the real life plane, almost like the 787 -The winglets are bigger than normal -On the Air Herler livery, the aft exit doors are not painted, so they're just completely white -For some reason, the Economy section's (located at the rear) windows is missing a window -No luggage bay doors -Last, but not least, theres 6 rows of windows missing on the rear of the aircraft just before the aft doors. Anyway, that's all folks
If you knew GTA vehicles, you know Rockstar always avoid copyright problems by "mashing up" designs Most of the "sins" you pointed out are the exact ways how Rockstar gives us so many vehicles without legal issues
it's just normal; copyright issues yk ? they do this to be as close as reality possible without leaving the "gta" world. just like soda brand, cars brand etc...
5:06 the MiG-19 that you show is actually a MiG-17, however the tail resembles the F-86 because of its "all-flying" tailplane design. the MiG-17 had a "Cruciform" tail design which has the Horizontal stabilizer intercept the vertical tail to create a cross like configuration. in game its closest version could be the MiG-17F due to the afterburner.
1:11 im pretty sure for every single vehicle rockstar has made they made it to look like the actual vehicle but not the exact same because copyright or or not to make the vehicle brand look bad. Great video dude i know this takes alot of time lol
"Now that the private jet market is open to every middle-class American willing to harvest their children's organs for cash, you need a new way to stand out. Forget standard light-weight, high-malleability, flame retardant aeronautical construction materials, yours are solid gold! It's time to tell the world exactly who you are. And you're speaking so loud, you don't even care if you'll melt and fall out of the sky during the next solar storm." A sin for Luxor Deluxe (not featured in this video) because this website description of the Luxor Deluxe implies that the plane is made out of gold. Irl, a plane made out of gold won't even fly. A missed sin for Vestra would be placing the ruddervators directly behind the jet engines which will severely stress the ruddervators.
As others have said in the comments, I believe that the In-game cargo plane is actually based on the smaller 125 Ruslan. The overall look of the plane matches the 125 much better with the exception of the 8 engine pods.
Absolutely love this video, I've been wanting something like this for so long! Coulda dinged the Learjer 45 for appearing to be a commercial aircraft versus it common use as a private or leased jet
i remember one of the propeller planes like the one based on the p51 or something turned very strangely on the ground. it felt like the control wheel was in the front when it was actually in the back
Just a friendly reminder that Rockstar could not make aircrafts identical to their real life counterparts just like the cars, for example thats why the Vestra has 2 turbines, the Sea Breeze has 4 propeller blades and the Hydra has a rear engine so I wouldn't count as a sin
almost the entire video video just boils down to "GTA planes are bad because they arent the spitting image of their IRL counterparts" why waste everybodies time? you should have critiqued the planes on their own, i.e as you already said this cockpit is reused for all fighter jets or "this" isnt realistic for a plane of that size or "that" doesnt make sense for a plane to have or whatever (sry 4 bad english)
Feedback: Nice facts. Expected something else like AI pathing though. Audio needs improvement: I can barely hear you at times and the "shitty mic" moment was kinda the one where audio was very consistent 😅 so it was actually better to understand. My YT is at full volume and it feels to me like you are semi whispering.
I really like this, even tho you missed some planes like: stunt plane, nimbus, luxor, or those other stunt planes added in the smugglers dlc, that water landing VTOL and more, you really should make a sequel
6:13 thats a "radial" engine. a "rotory" engine is a ww1 configuration where the cylinders spin along with the prop to maximize P-factor for the more manurable airplanes like the dr1 triplane. Radial engines are static from the rotation of the prop.
2:42 Cars have the same exact problem, the Enus Jubilee, despite being based on a Rolls Royce Cullinan, has the same interior as a Ford Edge. Even worse, it’s also for engine models. Tell me why a Dodge Charger SRT8 has an inline 4, and a 2007 Mustang has a Carburetor when in reality the last car sold new in the US with a carburetor was an Isuzu pickup from 1994?
Another miniscule but still noticeable pet peeve among GTA aviators is that NONE of the planes have pitot tubes. Even if they don't actually work, it would be nice to see them.
What you are failing to understand here is that while the planes in game are based off of and bear a heavy resemblance to real planes, they are not meant to be accurate replicas
I’ve noticed the airspeed indicator is usually in the yellow arc even when throttles at idle, even when taking off It goes to the yellow right away, sometimes taxiing. when you pull the power the plane descends rapidly. Airliners today use glass cockpits. I have expectations for Gta6
From now on, you'll be thinking of me at some point during the making of your future intros, and when that happens allow me to remind you how good you are at this. Stay safe out there
You forgot to mention that the LearJet has rectangular windows. Not only is this inaccurate, but dangerous(remember the comet). Therefore, I propose an additional 50 points just for the windows
As a pilot in real life who began his dream with the Hydra in GTA Online on 2015 i enjoy your videos about the aviation in this game. I always talk with a friend about how realistic will be the flight system on GTA 6 and how precise will be the models of the planes and fighter jets compared to the real life.
It's why I stopped play gta 5, the only thing I did on there was fly around, but then I discovered War Thunder a more realistic game for aircraft, granted it has a 1.5x G load increase meaning a aircraft that could only handle 9G's can now handle almost 12G's yet some how has almost the same sustained turn rate only over performing by 1 or 3 degrees. Either way, the point is, GTA is the worst for flying around, id recommend war thunder if... IF, your on console, if your on xbox go for Microsoft Flight simulator, and if your on PC, you get War Thunder, Microsoft Flight Simulator and DCS (Digital Combat Simulator) so if your on pc play what you find most realistic.
The rogue which you say is a pc-21 is actually a t-27 tucano. The cockpit is more sleek and conforms to the shape of the fuselage on the tucano rather than the pilatus, and the rudder is larger on the tucano just like the rouge.
![30 ชั่วโมงคนเดียว บนรถไฟชั้น 3 โซเวียต [Around The World Ep. 2]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/MlE9boAVqDA/mqdefault.jpg)
This video critiques rockstar's aircraft to their IRL counterpart, ignoring stuff like creativeness or copyright.
Hello freind why dont you critic the terrible gta plane physic instead
@@Cat-y4wbecause that would be hard to do and he probably doeant give a shit
Technically theres no proof that the Russians destroyed the an225. Also the tu160s wings dont fold ingame
@@will.provolone18they did fold
@@Cat-y4w Why would they do that lol? If you need more realistic plane physics - go play Microsoft Flight Sim instead. GTA is in no way a realistic game lmao
I think cargo plane is based on An 124 not An 225 . So that single vertical stabilizer make more sense .
I see the B52, AN227 and the C-5 Galaxy
Also 224 didn't have a rear cargo door, this has front and back, so it's most likely 124, not 224 based.
And also, it wasn’t a disrespect either. This game was made in 2013 and the an225 was destroyed in 2022
@@Byclops5712He meant that the in-game model was a disrespect to the real AN-225 due to the sheer number of inaccuracies. Obviously this was not a great joke, since the plane isn’t really based on the AN-225. However, he most likely did not mean that the irl plane’s destruction was what was disrespected.
It clearly has some features form the c-5
this might sound really nerdy and stuck up but fuck it, the reason the devs make the vehicles in game look different to the ones IRL is for cooyright reasons. They own the rights to the design of the vehicle so making a model of it in a video game without their permission would be a breach on copyright law.
The only thing nerdy and stuck up is the video ngl
Idk, they've been trying less and less with the cars as of recent.
This is where you get people who are obsessed over things do this. "Why does that car look like a Ferrari but is called a cheetah?" "Why does that A10 look like that?" Idk maybe because Rockstar doesn't want to pay copyrights to over 100+ Real world cars and aircraft. Could you imagine asking Lockheed Martin or Boeing to see if you can have their aircraft in the game. Don't get me wrong, I love GTA's aircraft and I totally get why they don't look realistic, but R* isn't going to spend the next 2-3 years detailing their vehicles to suit people's likes. If you want a real world aircraft, Get a Mod!.
Absolutely right, and what makes you evenly right is the fact they obviously parody those vehicles !@@emmeriankiwi6993
@@justajad2809 it actually pairs so well with how Lore deep the cars and aircraft can be in the game.
Bro doesn't realise most gta aircraft is a mix of multiple real-life aircrafts rather than being one
and he hearted the comment lmao
Yhea im annoyed that so many of these are just that they are not acurate to what they are based of. Like yhea its bot supposed to be exactly the same thats why they have different names
@@_Garskii_ I'm not really annoyed about it though, I just stated the facts lol, I guess he took it in a chill manner as well, which is fine by me
@@jastrtva9505 True that
Exactly. This video is a good idea, but a bit poorly executed.
You have to remember they have 0 licenses and thats why they parody vehicles by mixing and matching multiple variations.
Exactly
Ik this is late but you mention they have no liscense but how can you explain the avenger has an almost identical exterior to the Bell Boeing MV-22. They just lazy ong
Most of rockstars planes are planes mixed in, like the b52 engines on the 225 or the lazer having a twin tail instead of the singular tail. It’s a creative idea but they put little detail into it
@@LunarMARAUDERIt’s not a problem? The idea is not to make direct copies of vehicles and to rather take inspiration from many to both make a lore-friendly car that fills a wide niche and to avoid trademark infringement.
@@LunarMARAUDER Lil reminder that this game is 11 years old
@@LunarMARAUDER If you want 100% cockpit modeling accuracy go play flight simulator maybe ?
5:06 It's a MiG-17. The MiG-19 was a supersonic twinjet while the 17 was single-engined.
Actually, it appears to have the fuselage of a MiG-15 with the wings of a MiG-17. Cursed as shit.
6:20 That's a radial engine; rotary engines haven't really been used since WW1
the closest to it is a MiG-17F
6:13
Rotary engines are not Radial engines...
What we saw there was a radial engine.
I suggest you look up what rotary engine actually is. Its not the wankel engine you are thinking of. Its basically a radial but block spins and crankshaft remains stationary. Thats the only difference to radial engines.
@288gto7 true but those types of rotary engines more or less dies out in the 1920's.
@@lieutenantkas how sick would a rotary plane be though? That thing would sound epic!
@@288gto7 Incorrect, radials have pistons, rotaries do not. I’d love to educate my self on them but I’m busy running a performance rotary shop.
@@escapetarkov3838 no, type rotary engine to google. You are running a wankel engine shop and you dont even know what actual rotary engines are, really? You really should look up what the definition of rotary engine is, wiki has a good article on it :)
I counted only 12 sins and they were for either repeated cockpits, seating capacity errors, car doors, and design issues (alkonost short landing gear for example)
Mixture of designs from different planes to avoid legal issues shouldn’t be counted as sins.
the video would be a TH-cam short then
@@simon_ghost_rilley252I’d rather a Yt short than a wrong video
Woulda preferred this video if it was actually pointing out things actually wrong with the aircraft mainly, instead of pointing out how they are different with their real life counterparts, theyre meant to be different
exactly, thats what it was really about
@@SpidaMezthen maybe don’t count differences to irl counterparts as sins, as it’s just rockstar trying to avoid getting sued. Not hating, just constructive criticism.
4:09 it's based off the EMB-312 Tucano, you can notice it by looking at its tail design
more like the A29 to be honest
@@PaoloGiovanoli It has the bars like an EMB-314 but the canopy shape is from an EMB-312
Several design inaccuracies could be Rockstar attempt at avoiding copyright. I think. Idk.
probably, in the loading screen it says something like that
Bro doesn’t realise it’s a video game with fake brands 😭😭
But at least they don't use deep real details to create there fake brands
Unpopular opinion: putting the real brands on cars in the game WOULDNT make the game fun
@@Watermeloncatismyopp cause it’s be copyrighted to oblivion lol
@@wettoaster34 And because it's interesting to see how they manage to mix different parts of different cars into a coherent design that's still recognizable. Recently Rockstar has gone closer to copying real-life car designs, but there's still an original flair to them that I like. It would be incredibly boring if GTA was just another "real car advertisement" game.
4:20, when the engine is off, the covers are open, when the Mustang starts, it slowly retracts the doors. Look up a P-51 Mustang start and you'll see.
Tbf the reused cockpits is probably done to save disk space, the game is big enough as is.
fair
The Hydra actually takes more inspiration from Avpro's super Harrier proposal, an upgrade for the british harrier that includes a JSF stealth, jump jet design that gives the aircraft, another verticle stabiliser and has a low RCS, blended fuselage-nozzle type that provides afterburner, and can carry 4 more missiles underneath it's belly. It's an unorthodox design, but it is a way better JSF design proposal upgrade than the F-35's design.
The aircraft don't look identical on purpose.... would of preferred if you spoke about stuff like the flaws with their GTA designs instead of 'sinning' it for not completely copying it. I don't think GTA is your type of game if you only play for the vehicles and you only like vehicles identical to real life
7:10
You forgot the most important stuff
>wings dont SWEEP
>it is stealth for some reason
AND THE COCKPIT EUGHHHH
2:31
The hydra in San Andreas was more realistic then that
5:49 killed me
xD
The nimbus isn't at all based off the longitude . It's primarily based off the Cessna citation X . And a mix of the Embraer Praetor 600(cockpit windows)
6:49 Wingtips on the earlier Citation X were optional until the X+ and Longitude/Latitude had them as standard but agreed.
Pilatus pc21 ? Wow, i always tough that the Rogue was the Embraer EMB-314 Super Tucano
that's cause it is
Addendum: the Shamal’s instrument cluster displays the pitch and yaw incorrectly, being flipped for some reason.
The Alkanost’s wings, despite clearly having the slotting and mechanism for it, are not able to sweep to the rear position like the Tu-160.
I hate to be that, but you missed a couple of Jets and Planes. Titan, P-996, Pyro, etc… or will they be on part 2..?
4:52 surprisingly, Rockstar got the interior correct for the RJ contrary to what is mentioned in the video. Most regional carriers such as SkyWest and Air Wisconsin that operate(or used to operate) the 200 ran them in 2-2 configs.Some carriers may have a few in a 2-1 configuration, but I believe you may have mixed up the interior description with the slightly narrower ERJ-135/140/145 which is run in a 2-1 configuration.
Having been stuffed in many CRJ2s, I can say with confidence they are a 2-2 configuration in RJ service, although a very uncomfortable 2-2 configuration.
@ perks of taking a PJ design and turning it commercial lol
2:50 The Cargoplane is more based on the An-124, not the 225. This makes the amount of engines still too much, but the vertical stabilizer and the missing humps wouldn't be a mistake
1. It's called a rudder, not a yaw. Yaw is the movement of the aircraft, not the control surface
2. Not all stalls lead to spins, a spin is an uncoordinated stall
3. The C172S has landing lights on both wings
4. Older C172 variants have landing lights behind the propeller
no cessna has older landing lights with the wing landing lights, though
5:06 looks more like a mig 17
no the mig 17 has a different tail, the tail that is on the game is the exact tail that is on the mig 19 even thought the color is really matching the mig 17
@@aslios6644 The Mig 19 has 2 engines and looks nothing like the plane in game
I never thought in a decade someone would say the modernized cockpit of the AN225 just looks weird and doesn't like it that much, but here we are.
The designs are different from real life to avoid copyright issues because they don't have license to use real airplane models in their games.
1:34 Idk if the registration is too long or not.
2:06 I'm surprised you didn't put a sin on the fact that the instrument panel of the 747 in the game is too simple and is suited for light training planes and modern airline jets have glass cockpit. This jet doesn't even have a PFD, MFD and autopilot. The Cargo Plane's cockpit is more modern and accurate for modern airliners.
2:28 "The Hydra or Lazer is obviously based on Harrier in real life" those two are different jets.
5:39 I like that you put a note that the lights on the left wing are for newer models of Cessna 172 since older models like 172M has lights like where the Mammatus' lights are
7:05 Better if it's FBI instead of Lockheed Martin. Anyway, I like that part to poke at the reference to classified information
I like how Rockstar gave Alkonost stealth capabilities which will activate after reaching a certain altitude and above. The TU-160 was designed for reduced detectability to both radar and infrared signature, but it's not a stealth aircraft.
The biggest sins should be Rockstar making the Cargo Plane unobtainable in free mode singleplayer and making it and the 747 unobtainable in free roam in Online, not to mention the Cargo Plane's turbine blades rotate despite being unobtainable while most obtainable jets have turbine blades which do not rotate. Is it too much for them to allow us to fly those planes in free roam in Online and the Cargo Plane in free mode in Singleplayer?
5:05 based off of MiG 17, not 19
Trust me you wouldn't want that for Online players, although yes for the former !
Nice video,Subscribed.
Better then those normal cinema sins type of video that never criticized subjects with real facts.
Keep it up
I didn't even know that there are so many airplanes in GTA V. Very interesting to know your knowledge about airplanes and thank you bud.
4:25 What are you smoking dude. That's nothing like a bf-109 cockpit.
Hey, so at 2:18 when an aircraft reaches the critical angle of attack, the aircraft stalls. All spins are a stall, but not all stalls are a spin.
I think dude has some problems if all their stalls turn into spins
tbf spins are really fun
@@SpidaMez Nice. I remember doing spin training while working to get my CFI. Good times.
Epic! do a sandy shores video!
The cargo plane looks more like a C-5 Galaxy with B-52 engines
Also the propeller private jet looks more like a PC-9 and the russian cold war jet looks more like a MiG-15 (it's single engine)
1:18 you should have added a sim for it not immediately exploding.
I was expecting a critique of Trevor attempting to land a massive cargo plane at Mckenzie Air Field or how Devon Weston's jet was still doing pre flight checklist while there's an active police chase going on right outside
This was really detailed. I didn't even notice 90% of the stuff you mentioned 😂😂 I just use planes when I need to
4:56 Typical airliner configs on the CRJ2 has 2-2 seating, you probably mean the ERJs when you're talking about the 2-1 seating
1:19 Now, I'm an all time 747 fan so I'm here to point out some mistakes you didn't point out:
-The nose landing gear doors are way too long compared to the real life plane
-The windows are a little bit too small
-The front section of the plane is just too smooth compared to the real life plane, almost like the 787
-The winglets are bigger than normal
-On the Air Herler livery, the aft exit doors are not painted, so they're just completely white
-For some reason, the Economy section's (located at the rear) windows is missing a window
-No luggage bay doors
-Last, but not least, theres 6 rows of windows missing on the rear of the aircraft just before the aft doors.
Anyway, that's all folks
If you knew GTA vehicles, you know Rockstar always avoid copyright problems by "mashing up" designs
Most of the "sins" you pointed out are the exact ways how Rockstar gives us so many vehicles without legal issues
it's just normal; copyright issues yk ? they do this to be as close as reality possible without leaving the "gta" world. just like soda brand, cars brand etc...
The f160 is a mashup between the f35 and su75, that's why the stabilizer look like that
The Cessna having a car door is insane
5:06 the MiG-19 that you show is actually a MiG-17, however the tail resembles the F-86 because of its "all-flying" tailplane design. the MiG-17 had a "Cruciform" tail design which has the Horizontal stabilizer intercept the vertical tail to create a cross like configuration. in game its closest version could be the MiG-17F due to the afterburner.
You're wasting a fortune on missing rent by letting Rockstar live in your head rent free
again, i love the cinemasins style of critique and i wish more people used it. great work
7:17 Finally you said something rigth.
1:11 im pretty sure for every single vehicle rockstar has made they made it to look like the actual vehicle but not the exact same because copyright or or not to make the vehicle brand look bad. Great video dude i know this takes alot of time lol
"Now that the private jet market is open to every middle-class American willing to harvest their children's organs for cash, you need a new way to stand out. Forget standard light-weight, high-malleability, flame retardant aeronautical construction materials, yours are solid gold! It's time to tell the world exactly who you are. And you're speaking so loud, you don't even care if you'll melt and fall out of the sky during the next solar storm."
A sin for Luxor Deluxe (not featured in this video) because this website description of the Luxor Deluxe implies that the plane is made out of gold. Irl, a plane made out of gold won't even fly.
A missed sin for Vestra would be placing the ruddervators directly behind the jet engines which will severely stress the ruddervators.
I am tired as shit and all I read was "child organs" whaf the fuck lmaooo
I have never seen half of these planes in this game .
6:32 This is based off of the citation x not longitude, and in real life there are versions without winglets.
Pretty cool videos, keep it up mate!
Thanks, will do!
Can't wait for more once GTA 6 comes out
As others have said in the comments, I believe that the In-game cargo plane is actually based on the smaller 125 Ruslan. The overall look of the plane matches the 125 much better with the exception of the 8 engine pods.
as an aviation nerd, thank you, I always hated the way the GTA planes look.
Love your videos man, please keep posting
Absolutely love this video, I've been wanting something like this for so long!
Coulda dinged the Learjer 45 for appearing to be a commercial aircraft versus it common use as a private or leased jet
if you go inside, it looks like a private jet, so I assume its some charter company
I think using "were finally landing" was a good choice
Don’t forget about the fact that the f16 cockpit has two sticks in game 😂
You know its a video essay when home resonance comes on.
3:23 its Buran not space shuttle btw also the spaceplane part is called orbiter just so you know
i remember one of the propeller planes like the one based on the p51 or something turned very strangely on the ground. it felt like the control wheel was in the front when it was actually in the back
Imagine trying to escape the police or military if planes took off like real life planes in GTA 😂
Fun fact: All planes except biplanes have one wing!
Just a friendly reminder that Rockstar could not make aircrafts identical to their real life counterparts just like the cars, for example thats why the Vestra has 2 turbines, the Sea Breeze has 4 propeller blades and the Hydra has a rear engine so I wouldn't count as a sin
almost the entire video video just boils down to "GTA planes are bad because they arent the spitting image of their IRL counterparts"
why waste everybodies time? you should have critiqued the planes on their own, i.e as you already said this cockpit is reused for all fighter jets or "this" isnt realistic for a plane of that size or "that" doesnt make sense for a plane to have or whatever
(sry 4 bad english)
Cope
The problem with the Alkonost is that the wings don't move.
This vid was amazing. Keep up the work!
Feedback: Nice facts. Expected something else like AI pathing though. Audio needs improvement: I can barely hear you at times and the "shitty mic" moment was kinda the one where audio was very consistent 😅 so it was actually better to understand. My YT is at full volume and it feels to me like you are semi whispering.
Hopefully theyre better for gta6, you should do this with other categories like weapons, cars, brands, ect. New sub from me!
I really like this, even tho you missed some planes like: stunt plane, nimbus, luxor, or those other stunt planes added in the smugglers dlc, that water landing VTOL and more, you really should make a sequel
6:13 thats a "radial" engine. a "rotory" engine is a ww1 configuration where the cylinders spin along with the prop to maximize P-factor for the more manurable airplanes like the dr1 triplane. Radial engines are static from the rotation of the prop.
Love your videos!!
The Hydra is more a mix of the F-35B & AV-8B
3:56 the plane doesn’t have the two little fins under the main tail fin
2:42 Cars have the same exact problem, the Enus Jubilee, despite being based on a Rolls Royce Cullinan, has the same interior as a Ford Edge. Even worse, it’s also for engine models. Tell me why a Dodge Charger SRT8 has an inline 4, and a 2007 Mustang has a Carburetor when in reality the last car sold new in the US with a carburetor was an Isuzu pickup from 1994?
I like how this video is B7.37minutes long
I liked the planes in GTA V so much that I became a pilot IRL, even chose the Cherokee since it's the closest thing I could get to a Velum lol
Ok car door texture is pretty funny
Another miniscule but still noticeable pet peeve among GTA aviators is that NONE of the planes have pitot tubes.
Even if they don't actually work, it would be nice to see them.
I just noticed that lol
the Beech 18 being so fucked up makes me wanna cry, I love that thing irl
same
The An225 carried the Buran, not the space shuttle, if we're going to be nit picky about fictional aircraft.
The Beaver had a radial engine, not a rotary engine.
You are the official king of Nit picking 😂
this series is super entertaining 😂
What you are failing to understand here is that while the planes in game are based off of and bear a heavy resemblance to real planes, they are not meant to be accurate replicas
not gonna sin the fact several turboprop planes start like a piston engine ?
I’ve noticed the airspeed indicator is usually in the yellow arc even when throttles at idle, even when taking off It goes to the yellow right away, sometimes taxiing. when you pull the power the plane descends rapidly. Airliners today use glass cockpits. I have expectations for Gta6
From now on, you'll be thinking of me at some point during the making of your future intros, and when that happens allow me to remind you how good you are at this. Stay safe out there
Bro really trying to imitate Summoning Salt's intro like anyone wouldn't notice.
I guess it is the internet after all.
5:05 this aircraft is based on the MiG-17 or MiG-15, as the MiG-19 has two engines rather than one and has a far longer fuselage.
I really like your videos!! try putting the plane photos in every model for a comparison!!
You forgot to mention that the LearJet has rectangular windows. Not only is this inaccurate, but dangerous(remember the comet). Therefore, I propose an additional 50 points just for the windows
As a pilot in real life who began his dream with the Hydra in GTA Online on 2015 i enjoy your videos about the aviation in this game.
I always talk with a friend about how realistic will be the flight system on GTA 6 and how precise will be the models of the planes and fighter jets compared to the real life.
1:51 the 747 also doesnt have tilted gear
yo where did edit this video is good asf homie
Davinci Resolve
@@SpidaMez thank u, keep posting so I can keep watching your videos
It's why I stopped play gta 5, the only thing I did on there was fly around, but then I discovered War Thunder a more realistic game for aircraft, granted it has a 1.5x G load increase meaning a aircraft that could only handle 9G's can now handle almost 12G's yet some how has almost the same sustained turn rate only over performing by 1 or 3 degrees.
Either way, the point is, GTA is the worst for flying around, id recommend war thunder if... IF, your on console, if your on xbox go for Microsoft Flight simulator, and if your on PC, you get War Thunder, Microsoft Flight Simulator and DCS (Digital Combat Simulator) so if your on pc play what you find most realistic.
The rogue which you say is a pc-21 is actually a t-27 tucano.
The cockpit is more sleek and conforms to the shape of the fuselage on the tucano rather than the pilatus, and the rudder is larger on the tucano just like the rouge.