Article 370 Hearing, You're not Getting, CJI to Sibal

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ส.ค. 2023
  • Article 370 Hearing, You're not Getting, CJI to Sibal #SupremeCourtIndia #LawChakra
    Patna High Court Karnataka High Court Live Stream.
    #Patnahighcourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Supremecourt
    Courtesy :- Supreme Court of India
    Books on Constitution:- amzn.to/3rqFpbh
    Tools Used for editing:- amzn.to/3EelR1r
    For business Enquiries:- enquire@lawchakra.in
    #SupremeCourt#Mussorrie #advocate #lawyer #legal #livehighcourt #indianlaw #law #live #court #argument #criminaljustice #guiltyminds #learnadvocacy #courtlive #justicelive #lawmotivation #beajudge #ias #judge #law #legal #patnahighcourt #justiceashutoshkumar #judiciary #motivation #learnlaw #IAS #supremecourtofindia #IPS #2022 #Patnahighcourtstream #orissahighcourt #SupremeCourt #Orissahighcourt#GujaratHighCourt
    #Law #Chakra#JusticeAshutoshkumar
    *This Video is strictly for Legal Awareness & Education Purpose only.📚
    🙏 Follow us on twitter, Instagram and facebook.
    @Lawchakra
    👉Twitter
    / lawchakra
    👉 Instagram.
    / lawchakras
    📑*Fair Use Policy -*
    Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.

ความคิดเห็น • 268

  • @bshaamala
    @bshaamala 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +75

    Sibbal is like, how dare you question me milord! I was the one who helped you to the seat.

  • @vishwanathkr22
    @vishwanathkr22 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    Such educated luminaries not able to understand the simple word “temporary provision” is mind boggling.

    • @nothing-ce6rs
      @nothing-ce6rs 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Dafa ho..
      Tujy itni umar ni hogi jitny unko articles maloom hain..
      Its Temporary bcz of referendum dont say without studying the case

    • @bird677
      @bird677 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      ​@@nothing-ce6rstune jb "referendum " word use kiya tbhi smjh aa gya k toone kitna study kiya hai case...
      Referendum ki baat hi nhi huyi kbhi....Kuch bhi ghusa rha hai bich me....gawar mullah

    • @riteshkumarcts
      @riteshkumarcts 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@bird677mullas are by default gawar no need of adding adjective 😂😂

    • @xyz_1943
      @xyz_1943 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      ​@@nothing-ce6rs😂😂😂 according to my research...unko 370 dena hi unconstituional tha... india me kaise alag alag constitution ho skte the lekin Congress ne Kara....khud president order ke jariye apply kr diya tha...tab kya logo se pucha tha ?

    • @quantum9036
      @quantum9036 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@xyz_1943
      1. There was no country named India before 1947. British occupied multiple territories and merged it and formed two nations in 1947. Kashmir was not part of India but was included in India in 1947.
      2. As per constitution, India is a federal republic. In a federal republic, each states has some different sets of law.

  • @STPT-SaiBaba
    @STPT-SaiBaba 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +73

    This is one of the STRANGEST CASE. Here SC is trying to convince a Lawyer whereas it's the job of lawyer to convince the Court, A Supreme Court. Laughable process of judiciary.

    • @neelameghashyamdesai2531
      @neelameghashyamdesai2531 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Lawyer is assumed to be wise because of seniority. But one thing is clear. Each one of the judges is trying to tell him that his line of argument is outdated, of course, without hurting him. He is refusing to recognize that they are respecting his age but not wisdom.

    • @ajaxjaiswal3442
      @ajaxjaiswal3442 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Illiterate people telling because of their bhakti that the honorable supreme court is laughable, but they forget to understand that if supreme court gets compromised by politicians then this country will go back to stone age and the age of maai-baap era of zamindari system....
      What a haramkhor janta is this! Lol.😅

    • @STPT-SaiBaba
      @STPT-SaiBaba 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@ajaxjaiswal3442 the difference between literate and illiterate ppl is that 1. Ppl don't go abusing others or calling by names. 2. If one disagrees with others then no need to comment. Good Morning

  • @drkranthi007
    @drkranthi007 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    We now understand why there are so many pendings in courts

    • @kolardorpe3161
      @kolardorpe3161 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      According to you Supreme court must award hasty decision..
      I hope this bench must protect the 120 cr citizen of the nation.

    • @drkranthi007
      @drkranthi007 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kolardorpe3161 but they serve only elite few

  • @smitaghia443
    @smitaghia443 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    All parliamentarians should change constitution as per modern time..

    • @sameer-111
      @sameer-111 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They can't, they run our country, but they aren't founding fathers of the nation

    • @animalhuman1976
      @animalhuman1976 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂😂😂😂😂kavi nhi hoga andhvakt .....kitne sare ..kitne govt aye aur gye 😅😅😅😅

    • @jaatkthaat7
      @jaatkthaat7 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@animalhuman1976Khairaat waale ho😂😂😂

    • @deshrajdabhade7537
      @deshrajdabhade7537 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Who decides the rules of morden time bjp who couldn't give us a unbiased media half of the country is divided in hindi Muslim and other half is brainwashed not to mention major parts of country is literally burning( that is putting mildly the current situation)or Congress whos corruption is unprecedented
      morden politicians are not driven by ideology they just go where there is more money if this trashy politicians would have to make a new constitution we will be new North Korea or some African country .the only good think about this new India is that it runs mostly on 70 years old papers the we called constitution

    • @avdhutpawar1545
      @avdhutpawar1545 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Its impossible to change whole Constitution.

  • @bastabbiswas7734
    @bastabbiswas7734 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    Most important point is, Who is paying the steep Fees to Ld. Sibal for this case ?

    • @sputnikwar8005
      @sputnikwar8005 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Correct

    • @N-et6gb
      @N-et6gb 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why does it matter? All you have think and greed for justice at any cost should prevail

    • @rohanroy7872
      @rohanroy7872 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's a one in lifetime chance to argue before a 5 member constructional bench , probably more than 5 judges in future.
      Also you will be in constant news because of this complex case
      Not only law students but entire india watching your arguments also whole world is watching.
      It is not only sibal but also for judges and india as country to showcase world how robust is our judicial system.

    • @Vishwajeetvpsingh
      @Vishwajeetvpsingh 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@rohanroy7872why are you writing same thing over and over again on different threads. It seems like you have a lot of time or are you copy pasting whats app massages?

    • @AnandKumar-lu6ze
      @AnandKumar-lu6ze 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Vishwajeetvpsingh he is paid to do that👍😀

  • @sureshtripathy8980
    @sureshtripathy8980 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +64

    We will appreciate mr.Sibbal if he fight for thousands of Kashmiri pandits who were massacred

    • @noone-apersecutedmajority6448
      @noone-apersecutedmajority6448 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Annihilated to be more specific..this constitution was designed to denigrate Hindus n convert Hindus in garb of democracy

    • @brihaddas696
      @brihaddas696 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Panun Kashmir, a political group representing the Pandits who fled Kashmir, has published a list of about 1,341 Pandits killed and hundreds of women raped since 1990. Resulted in‎: ‎Mass Migration of Kashmiri Hindus from the valley.
      Why SC denied considering a probe into the exodus of Kashmiri pandits?

    • @wanchooo29
      @wanchooo29 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@brihaddas696SC said that it's been so many years.

    • @sarojjena9947
      @sarojjena9947 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      HE CALL SELL HIS MOTHERLAND FOR MONEY. . . .BUT, WILL NEVER FIGHT FOR JUSTICE

    • @wanchooo29
      @wanchooo29 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sarojjena9947 who?

  • @Nobody_knows768
    @Nobody_knows768 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I think someone need to probe the funding for this case to expose the faces hiding behind this

  • @tintiniitk
    @tintiniitk 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

    Sibal is claiming that not only article 370 isn't temporary, it's so permanent that even a govt in full majority can't amend the constitution to remove it.

    • @archerverse13
      @archerverse13 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      when budda has surpassed senility

    • @ovaisamin4155
      @ovaisamin4155 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Which govt are you talking about? Was state govt taken on board?
      Tomorrow the illiterate bjp goons can devalue any state to a UT level, without the constituent assembly of a state. This is absolutely unconstitutional.

    • @secular_citizen
      @secular_citizen 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Wrong ! He is claiming that union government cannot remove Article 370 without the approval of the elected government of Jammu and Kashmir first. Put correct facts.

    • @Krish-jm6ve
      @Krish-jm6ve 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      @@secular_citizen No Sir, He says Union Govt cannot touch 370 unless recommended by "Constituent" assemble of J&K which was resolved back in 1957. J&K "Legislature" Assembly is also not authorized to recommend. Even President cannot initiate it.
      His argument is basically that "Constituent" assemble of J&K should be formed first, by dissolving J&K "Legislature" Assembly then only they can recommend.
      Dumb lawyer wasting everyone's time. Long live Secular Liberls of India

    • @jaatkthaat7
      @jaatkthaat7 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@secular_citizen Governor has all the power to behave and pass laws as state governments during the presidential rule....
      Clear your facts as well😂😂😂

  • @rockin2moon
    @rockin2moon 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The Parliament is Supreme. Period.

  • @kulfibadaam7788
    @kulfibadaam7788 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    It went some way in restoring some faith in judiciary… let’s see how it all transpires …
    Sibal and Congress … UNBELIEVABLE UNTRUSTWORTHINESS

  • @yogeshsinghpal6407
    @yogeshsinghpal6407 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    revisiting constitution with a modern and reformative perspective is needed,,,

  • @siddhaanand
    @siddhaanand 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Looks like Sibal is Judge and the honourable justices are arguing the case.
    The more Sibal argues the more votes congress will loose.

  • @Jupiterplus
    @Jupiterplus 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Patriotic People who are worried, need not worry. This is a democracy in action. Sibbal Khan can argue whatever he wants, but SC judges are not that dumb. God bless Mother India!

    • @rogermoore00
      @rogermoore00 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Our judges are the lead clowns in this circus

    • @Parantak-gx3dw
      @Parantak-gx3dw 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      क्या इस नाटक के लिए हमारे न्यायालय के पास समय है, क्या यह इतना जरूरी है जिस पर बहस की जाए।

  • @vaibhavtripathi76
    @vaibhavtripathi76 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Just thinking how complex our constitution was made that time when we had so much illiteracy in our country. Assumptions to these provisions in simple words are also so ambiguous to many people.

    • @N-et6gb
      @N-et6gb 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes it is for you

    • @atul3009
      @atul3009 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Pogo kid spotted 😊

  • @pranjalkumar7214
    @pranjalkumar7214 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This the power of indian constitution that after passing of the bill from legislature it has challenged in court judiciary and clarify it

  • @NRILegalAid
    @NRILegalAid 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How much you Mr Sibal will mislead the bench. The Bench is very intelligent. Supreme Intelligent and understanding by Supreme Court

  • @ShivamSahuIndia
    @ShivamSahuIndia 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    चंदू बाई का सुप्रीम कोठा

  • @soujanyamohinta6778
    @soujanyamohinta6778 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Sibbal is like: Issey kehte hai "reading"

  • @rohanroy7872
    @rohanroy7872 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    It's a one in lifetime chance to argue before a 5 member constructional bench , probably more than 5 judges in future.
    Also you will be in constant news because of this complex case
    Not only law students but entire india watching your arguments also whole world is watching.
    It is not only sibal but also for judges and india as country to showcase world how robust is our judicial system.

  • @HasdaRocks
    @HasdaRocks 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Every Law in the Constitution of India and its reforms comes under the purview of Judicial review which cannot be denied. And Judicial review is much needed in a civilised society with democratic values.
    It is like the 370 abrogation is going through Agnipariksha.
    If it clears the test then it an absolute win for GOI.
    Also note that this hearing is not only viewed by Indians but by the whole world. As J&K is the reason of friction between India and Pakistan. That's why you can see the Judges all calm and composed and letting Sibal to keep his points in a respectful manner.

    • @drshri555
      @drshri555 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's the beauty of India. We are transparent even though there is lot of internal clutter. If this was Pakistan Mr Sibbal would have been killed for speaking against the govt.

    • @soumyadeepsengupta9797
      @soumyadeepsengupta9797 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@drshri555forget pakistan

    • @drshri555
      @drshri555 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@soumyadeepsengupta9797 it is just a reference as these are the people who go in UN and shout India is doing crime against Muslims and those supporting them. Well for India, Pakistan is buried but we need to wipe out our memories by getting to Numero Uno not 2 or 3. That should be practically and strategically done by our politicians in the next 25yrs. And people of India need to come out of caste and start contributing to the growth of India. Politicians can ruine it if we still keep 1000yr old understanding of our cast and religion.

  • @AK-ny5bz
    @AK-ny5bz 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Chaha ji has left such a mess that even after 75 years So many legal minds are tryjng to untangle.

  • @user-qr9cd9pe6p
    @user-qr9cd9pe6p 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    370 should be every State Of the country Which protect hole system of state otherwise its results are nagtive

  • @gokultr1290
    @gokultr1290 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Sibal is very good at confusing, let him come up with something, but outside the court 😃😃.. waste of time

  • @sunilvidivada
    @sunilvidivada 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Next CJI to Rajya sabha....

  • @charrot9352
    @charrot9352 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Kapil sibbal is going to loose all credibility and respect after this !!!!

    • @deec2564
      @deec2564 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      didnt have any after defending terrorists

  • @bharat7169
    @bharat7169 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We want article 370 back. We just can't speak it out because all of you know why?

  • @smitaghia443
    @smitaghia443 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Punish Sibbal, fine. Sibbal for wasting time
    Of court in anti India case .

    • @Hi_yayawar
      @Hi_yayawar 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh yes. 100 crore minimum and hia license cancelled

  • @bijoylaha7245
    @bijoylaha7245 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    16 August after my case going to Supreme Court

  • @pradeepchoorapetty1752
    @pradeepchoorapetty1752 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is there a need to convince a defence lawyer by sitting judges.

  • @gopalkrishnamukerjea4319
    @gopalkrishnamukerjea4319 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    No one should be allowed to waste precious time of The Honourable Supreme Court of India. Mr. Sibal goes round and round like a jalebi trying to confuse the most learned judges of our country.

  • @PUDHUVAI53
    @PUDHUVAI53 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Judge is polite and silently hearing all the beating the bushes for confusion but he is neutral and in the interest of our Nation. Mr. Sipal is a Congress man and one side argument as Opposion Party in Paliament.
    .

  • @sivakumarreddy6981
    @sivakumarreddy6981 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Our. Institution is not a sacred document given by the divine. Citizens of India in 1952 have given themselves a constitution, appropriate for their times.
    We the citizens 2023 have the same right to amend or give a whole new constitution,as per our present situation.
    Constitution is not supreme.Citizens are supreme.

    • @soumyadeepsengupta9797
      @soumyadeepsengupta9797 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But it’s impossible to amend the entire constitution and the ideas are not outdated, article 370 isnt outdated too but due to political factors and separatist tendencies it was abolished
      The constitution of USA is 200 yrs old they didn’t need to amend it all cuz of our constitution is written by great people and its design is the best in the entire world so forget amending it

    • @soumyadeepsengupta9797
      @soumyadeepsengupta9797 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And ur entire statement is foolish
      Looks like u are inspired by some political party

  • @manjunath.gururaj8558
    @manjunath.gururaj8558 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Sibal in peak pseudo self boasting mode thinks he can fly from earth to sky high ghanchali man

  • @JRG5
    @JRG5 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Constitution is not asmani quitab which can't be amended

  • @AA-yt4ef
    @AA-yt4ef 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This argument should be suspended and NSA should be applied to whole Kashmir.

  • @charrot9352
    @charrot9352 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    No wonder congress also opposed abrogation of 370

    • @soumyadeepsengupta9797
      @soumyadeepsengupta9797 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No they opposed the way it was abrogated they didn’t oppose the abrogation itself, thats what is going on in sc the procedure for the abrogation is unconstitutional

    • @charrot9352
      @charrot9352 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@soumyadeepsengupta9797 r u nuts ?? Kapil sibbal clearly said it is permanent... Without J&k constitue assembly recommendation this cant be taken away.. dont try to be oversmart if you ain't smart

  • @anonymous-qt9qg
    @anonymous-qt9qg 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Crongress is behind sibbal , Rahul have no guts coming in front he hide like a lajwanti

  • @vaidyasethuraman452
    @vaidyasethuraman452 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    he will not get the point, he is a politician ...

  • @notrat5678
    @notrat5678 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sibal wasting time of the supreme court and people's money

  • @rajivgupta9885
    @rajivgupta9885 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    SC is hearing the abrogation of the very article which restricted it's jurisdiction out of J&K 😅😅

  • @RDayal-qr6ip
    @RDayal-qr6ip 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Has Sr.Advocate Gopal Subramanium advocated that Article 370 should go. Relying only on the Constituent Assembly prior to the state adopting acRepublic form of govt and the constitution of India. They are following it as their constitution of J&K . The constitution can be amended with the development in their accepting Indian Parliament, Presdent who appoints tge Governor .

  • @paperclips1306
    @paperclips1306 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is very difficult clause a b c d and this list that list , difficult than computer programming.

  • @ManjunathLaksh
    @ManjunathLaksh 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It looks like 5 lawyers trying to convince CJI Kapil Sibal..

  • @BoatRocker619
    @BoatRocker619 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    What a waste of tax payers money

    • @soumyadeepsengupta9797
      @soumyadeepsengupta9797 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tax payer money me jk ke log bhi ate h ye unke future ka sawal h

  • @sumasrinivas7167
    @sumasrinivas7167 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am very much surprised to see the hiring of cases of kabbil only. No other csses in sc? They are discussing the parliament proceedings ?

  • @ponungpullom4672
    @ponungpullom4672 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Kapil sibal would b remember as supporter of traitors.

  • @dm5665
    @dm5665 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Stop CJI salary for the entire period of debate on Article 370. Tax payers money getting wasted on anti India Activity in SC.

  • @satishshenai6334
    @satishshenai6334 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Its like neighbouring country represented by ld Sibal arguing in UN against India.

  • @saurabhcom_pride
    @saurabhcom_pride 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hearing this matter is a total waste of time.......This is why huge cases are pending in courts

  • @dilipdas3342
    @dilipdas3342 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    sraightforward argument , feature of less reputed Lawyer but self contradictory complicated argument ,feature of more reputed Lawyer

  • @cahil0982
    @cahil0982 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sibal Sir be like my boys this is that and that is this

  • @dr.shiddalingeshwarayyavas198
    @dr.shiddalingeshwarayyavas198 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Appeasing political ideology of Congress party is mixed in the arguments of Kapil sibal. because of this heanus ideology Hindustan was partitioned.still it's continued.

  • @govindpratap8957
    @govindpratap8957 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Present court judges are hungry of being on tv all the time..cause no any civil case proceedings will be telecast

  • @prashantrathod6418
    @prashantrathod6418 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is Mr.Sibbal's or for that matter ANY Indian lawyers'interest against the abrogation of 370 ??
    This defines logic ...
    The MAIN achievement of this case will be that the abrogation will get the stamp from the Supreme Court hence this problem will be settled for posterity... Well played GOI and SC... 👏

  • @nikhil.k3
    @nikhil.k3 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Imagine what would Congress have done to India

  • @souravmondal8362
    @souravmondal8362 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    CJI said main point that sibbal not getting the point, 😂😂

  • @sudhirkakkar
    @sudhirkakkar 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ask Sibbal to bring back PoKto Indian State. NOWHERE MAHARAJA HARI SINGH has signed any document for Kashmir to be given to Pakistan.

  • @sarojjena9947
    @sarojjena9947 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    CHAPPAL IS FRUSTRATED

  • @babulipatra4381
    @babulipatra4381 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When country as a whole rejoice of getting rid of article 370, then here comes congress and allied advocate who argue for reinstate of 370.

    • @soumyadeepsengupta9797
      @soumyadeepsengupta9797 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      U know what is article 370 ? Or how was it abolished? Btw are u from kashmir, why are u rejoicing about it? Kashmir was India before and kashmir is India now what’s the difference?
      Stop following bjp itcell trolls, removal of art 370 wont lower the price of tomatoes

  • @ponungpullom4672
    @ponungpullom4672 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    SC 5 judjes bench seem helpless again st this buddddda

  • @mmd5100
    @mmd5100 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Strange sibbal

  • @ashavijayalakshmi2284
    @ashavijayalakshmi2284 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It’s not ambiguous..but simple common sense. But the lawyer is doing “ vithanda Vaad”,it’s just like the kid crying that the elephant shd get in side the pot. …he shd be fined for wasting s.courts time.

    • @sbbb_____sblscl
      @sbbb_____sblscl 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Haha.... That is a part of appeasement politics.... The Congress wants to sent a message to a certain group of people that it is against the abrogation of 370

  • @indianaffairs987
    @indianaffairs987 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pakistan wants 370 back...and kapil is doing same...good.. proud of you

  • @daya579
    @daya579 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    He s wasting Courts time , 3 Soldiers were killed by terrorists in support of Abrogation of Article 370 ,
    Basic logic is Rules, Constitution etc can be in force when there situation is normal - You cant impose law and order in a Jungle - Just like in WB panchayat elections it was bloodshed but - the Judges are unable to do anything - Even Paramilitary was silent spectator ... All this is pure time waste !!

    • @soumyadeepsengupta9797
      @soumyadeepsengupta9797 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do u live in Wb ? How much do you know about bengal ?
      আপনার পুরো কথাটাই হাস্যকর 😅

  • @gstree1467
    @gstree1467 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Sibal is gone to nuts.....even beyond it....he is indeed a pathetic lawyer to defend 370 which is buried down couple of years bback...😂😂

    • @deec2564
      @deec2564 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      sibal khan

    • @soumyadeepsengupta9797
      @soumyadeepsengupta9797 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He isn’t defending it he is challenging the “procedure “ of removal

    • @gstree1467
      @gstree1467 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@soumyadeepsengupta9797 bhai yeh defend hi kr rha hsi iska permanently nature.....attack toh isspr bjp ne 2019 pr hi krke khtm kiya tha....thodda coomon sense bhi lga liya kro...anyway...that's fine...

  • @TheKansen
    @TheKansen 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why 4 judges are in big red chairs while 5th one in a regular chair?

    • @paperclips1306
      @paperclips1306 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nice point. I also want to know

  • @user-kp5ps7gj8b
    @user-kp5ps7gj8b 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Any law or constitution can and should be changed. Its not medieval fundamentalist book like kuran.

  • @sanjayvaidya4925
    @sanjayvaidya4925 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Billing per hour ka sawaal hai bhai.

  • @gameaccount1641
    @gameaccount1641 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Make a list who doesn't want J&K integrated part of India, i bet 100% people will be from Congress.

  • @Mhlone
    @Mhlone 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Chacha ka dimaag us k ghuthnu me hai...aur ghutney kaam kr nahi rahe hain🎉

  • @krishnamoorthys8389
    @krishnamoorthys8389 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Article 368(5)

  • @bahheplsk2517
    @bahheplsk2517 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Sibal do well👍👍👍

  • @rudreshvora9042
    @rudreshvora9042 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It is waste of Supreme Court time and tax payer money. What congress could not dare to do is done by Modi and congress wants to prove Modi wrong!

  • @Vinod_bharat
    @Vinod_bharat 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sibbal is just using where our constitution looks weak ie he is doing misinterpretation and moulding acts by defending them other provisions.

  • @nufkistruff9961
    @nufkistruff9961 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Saibal true Face of Traiter

  • @pari.sociojustice
    @pari.sociojustice 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    JK axceeded to Union of India means . .
    Union of India has all the absolute power to do anything for betterment of JK people.
    And Absolute power means the Parliament.
    Executive order of President is also absolute but challengable in court.
    But The Parliament resolution is unchallegable in any court unless it is itself the parliament.

    • @soumyadeepsengupta9797
      @soumyadeepsengupta9797 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Actually not
      It acceded to the union in a total federal way so GOI can’t just do anything
      Example: in usa drawing new boundaries of state is like redrawing the boundaries between two countries, its the same here

    • @soumyadeepsengupta9797
      @soumyadeepsengupta9797 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And ur words that a parliamentary bill cant be challenged says u know nothing about the judiciary; its the guardian of the constitution and its “spirit” it can overturn ordinances, bills which are unconstitutional, this is the magic of dr ambedkar

    • @pari.sociojustice
      @pari.sociojustice 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@soumyadeepsengupta9797 SC has right and power to declare unconstitutional but As a spirit of our constitutional structure and spirit SC always hesitate to comment or pass verdict against the parliamentary resolution because generally it assumes Act by parliament cannot be abusive in nature or abusive to the fundamental rights but executive order or ordinance may be abusive. So SC always forwards to a constitutional bench in such case resulting a prolong post scenario of post-Act affects are precisely reflected publicly. And hence the case challenged ll have a clear picture of that act passed . Therefore in this case since 4 years are already over and the JK people are satisfied sufficiently then SC can't give a verdict against the parliamentary act.

  • @Rdc12352
    @Rdc12352 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Jo desh ke hit me hi usko virodh krna,deshdroh hi,sibbal knowledge ka दुरुपयोग कर. रहा है

  • @desrajchechi3768
    @desrajchechi3768 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why people call him CJI instead of CJ of supreme court of india

    • @paulm.k.8740
      @paulm.k.8740 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why is the PM called PM of India-for the same reason.

  • @ramavtartulsyan
    @ramavtartulsyan 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Kitna waqt h sc k pass waste karne k like pending kaam side m factual kaam k like h law

  • @deec2564
    @deec2564 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    padhey likhe nalayak in action . Trying to make lassi out of water

  • @neelameghashyamdesai2531
    @neelameghashyamdesai2531 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Going by the way cases are filed left and right, it appears that, after 2014, the precious time of the judiciary is being eaten by a handful of self styled legal luminaries.
    The court should take up suo moto the plight thousands of undertrials in jails for years and order the Govt to release them. Some of them are for petty cases.
    These so-called celebrity layers are denying justice to the small hapless undertrials.

  • @bjayyy
    @bjayyy 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have been watching Kapil sibal in many cases. As a common man my opinion is that rather than making valid points , he relies on bulldozing and making fun of comments by judges. Very intimidating person and the judges look like they are intimidated by him.

  • @nufkistruff9961
    @nufkistruff9961 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Had this case was about Nupur Sharma or of a Hindu, SC would become outraged and sentenced the victim in 1st couple of mins.

    • @drshri555
      @drshri555 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bhai kuch bhi

  • @sainathreddy7919
    @sainathreddy7919 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sibal says yes, correct, absolutely for every speech of judges. Then again why he is arguing & judges are allowing him to do so. All show is becoming very big drama and its total waste of time.

  • @kpsudhakar6900
    @kpsudhakar6900 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Looks like Constitution Bench is having time to do postmortem of Amendment to Art 370 .. pandita goshti..

  • @sivakumarreddy6981
    @sivakumarreddy6981 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Big drama.
    Looks more like a discussion or seminar in a law school.
    Why are the judges are arguing the case instead of the lawyer presenting his case?
    Going round and round

  • @BP-gn2cl
    @BP-gn2cl 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yeh admi gol gol argument kar raha hai. 370 is past now...

  • @manisubramanian7683
    @manisubramanian7683 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Needless Waste of time. President has all the powers and in line with the Parliament duly elected by the people of India. They are interpreting minor words here and there to suit their own convenience. These have to be read as a whole. The preamble for enacting should be the main concern. Having said then the effects of such order by the President and more so, in current circumstances where 4 years have elapsed the overall mood and will of the needs to be taken into account as a support to the presidential order. It is as simple as that. To hell with the frivolous petitions which has a right place in the waste bin.

  • @ganeshav2768
    @ganeshav2768 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does this man requires so much time to be given to present his case? Ive heard in higher courts of the west , limited time is allowed to present the case in terms of time slots and date n time of judgement is published in advance.

  • @Jacknjellify531.
    @Jacknjellify531. 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Who is the judge who is lawyer here?

    • @Hi_yayawar
      @Hi_yayawar 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      5 lawyers sitting on big dias are trying to convince one judge surrounded by lawyers.

  • @rengarajaramaswamy8222
    @rengarajaramaswamy8222 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Probably Sibbu 's understanding is Temporary - (Quasi) permanent...... In his big belly - quasi got eatenup & digested..... It is PERMANENT for him. He is fit toget treatment in MENTAL HOSPITAL. Only request - Please do keep him life time in- patient. Please guard him in FETTERS.

  • @manabsarkar8835
    @manabsarkar8835 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Sibbal wants the same expression as Pakistan wants.

  • @ads7506
    @ads7506 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Chandrachud schooled Sibal about what is union and concurrent list and what are the presidential (parliament powers) and yet he keeps on being Pappu.

  • @chandrashakher3477
    @chandrashakher3477 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is country is important or courts and advocates important. If tomorrow Court say Kashmir is not part of India will it be implemented? Judges / advocates can also be bought by foreign countries. Judges are also human beings. They are also having human weaknesses. In this country CJI or courts are not above parliament.

    • @soumyadeepsengupta9797
      @soumyadeepsengupta9797 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What nonsense are you speaking? Court can’t order anything out of constitution but it will do anything to protect the constitution , are u a class 2 student? What logic is this?

    • @soumyadeepsengupta9797
      @soumyadeepsengupta9797 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Constitution is supreme and supreme court is its guardian , read the bloody constitution; in every democracy u will find such kind of powers given to Supreme Court

  • @SunilKumar-gf1lv
    @SunilKumar-gf1lv 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mr Sibal lacks knowledge of national justice.

  • @Surihampi
    @Surihampi 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We the People of India condemn Mr. Sibal, anyone who goes against our interests as a nation by virtue of our diversity. We think Sir that you must be very sensible on hurting people's emotions. Sir, we are mere Humans and we know that you may have vested interest in this. Are you not a patriot? Why at your age Sir???

    • @quantum9036
      @quantum9036 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      1. You are not representative of all citizens of india.
      2. Hindu interests and National interest are different.

    • @drshri555
      @drshri555 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@quantum9036Mr why are you so obsessed with Hindus....it's a Hindu fighting the case for article 370 and not a Muslim please get your head clear. Everywhere don't bring Hindu Muslim please. Put a full stop we Indians have great Muslim friends and we fight for them so don't put Hindu Muslim Everywhere.

    • @Surihampi
      @Surihampi 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @quantum9036 We are talking about we Indians my friend not You.

  • @user-xg2yg2vf1s
    @user-xg2yg2vf1s 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    He is stubborn and ignorant.

  • @MrRaviBh8
    @MrRaviBh8 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Kapil sibal should be given oscar for over acting

  • @Ginies120
    @Ginies120 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    हिंदी अनुवाद मे है क्या

    • @sameer-111
      @sameer-111 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Caption ke option pe click karke translate karlo, ho jaeya