Lol the opponent in the first game first randomly had Kiki, and then shuffled into siege gang. So they actually could have killed you if they simply believed in the heart of the cards. But I guess they decided to just die
If I'm not mistaken Infinite Snoops was infinite Mana with Prospector, combined with the Ringleader they had in hand they should really have tried harder.
Opponent probably doesn't knownwhat scoop does. Infinite mana is pretty bonkers in scoop gobs, so many ways to win especially with a ringleader and playing the kiki from the deck. That's 6 cards to look at for a wincon or to keep chaining and even if you don't hit it you probably have at least 20 p/t on board.
They could made inifinite mana, dumped their hand and if that gave them enough blockers they could have used snoops ability at their endstep to keep an untapped snoop during Seth's turn then at Seth's endstep made inifite snoops to swing for the win next turn! If they didn't have enough to block they could have played kiki off the top, played ringleader(then copy it) and possibly go from there! That first game made me so sad to see.
@@Oko_Plz here's my deck list I actually don't think this is quite accurate anymore I've tweaked it a little since playing with it on MTGO. The Cleansing Wildfires are strictly bloodmoon tech because that card wrecked me lol. www.mtggoldfish.com/deck/1000247#paper
29:20 Match 3 Game 1 - 10 power Abominable Treefolk, 1 power Boreal, 1 power Augur 4 power Faceless Haven is 16 power by itself. So yeah, playing that one Frost Augur would make the Abominable 11 power, and give you 17 damage, unless I'm missing something.
@Who needs profile Pictures Really? It only makes the deck better. I suppose it eliminates a minute amount of bluff value, but additional options at near-to-no cost are always acceptable.
Honestly, I love this deck so much. This is probably one of the most competitive budget modern decks I've seen here. You have so many different win cons creating pressure. This deck is fire.
The opponent can sac Goblins to Sling-Gang Lieutenant to drain for one, so even if we pumped Ascendant up to four power it wouldn't actually be lethal .
At 11:57 you say that you're looking for Blizzard Brawl with Glacial Revelation - but that spell can only get snow *permanents* into your hand and Blizzard Brawl is an instant ? Did you misspeak, are you looking to mill the card to recur it somehow - or am I missing something ?
aug- (1) Proto-Indo-European root meaning "to increase." It forms all or part of: auction; augment; augmentative; augur; August; august; Augustus; author; authoritarian; authorize; auxiliary; auxin; eke (v.); inaugurate; nickname; waist; wax (v.1) "grow bigger or greater." It appears that an auger does indeed aug
That was unfortunate for the opponent Match 1 Game 1. Had they created infinite Snoops while the Kikki was on the top of the deck then fetched they would have won with the Sling-Gang Lieutenant for infinite damage. At the very least they would have had infinite Red Mana to cast whatever else was in their hand.
Why did Seth take damage at 22:12? The Goyf was blocked by the Coatl (even though it died to an instant the damage should not have gone to him right because the creature is still technically blocked) Correct me if I'm wrong. I'm confused
Nice deck! I'd go and replace Three Seasons with Jorn (this deck can benefit greatly from mana advantage) and the 5 mana wurm with a 3/1 split of Saddled Rimestag/Blessing of Frost.
Last game, as soon as I saw you not immediatlely pass the turn and hold up one of your sideboard cards, I thought to myself, "Seth, how many times are you going to doubt that your opponent has the nuts before you learn your lesson." Worst case you wait one turn and you can just hold it up the rest of the game, 1 turn off vs storm to guarentee no instant death is definitely worth it. Worst case your opponent is stream sniping and they know you have the green storm instant, and they still have to storm at least 5 cards to get tibalt.
Whoa-ho-wowie! A video where we might get a creature, Conifer Wurm, with the P/Ts of some striking proportions! Here's hoping for an 18/18 that throws the quietus onto a opponent who paid for the Replacement Effect on a Shockland!
32:05 Ok, might not be a good idea to do this on a 2 year old video and not a more recent one, but why do people grab more cards than they need to off effects like Atraxa or glacial revelation if they are just going to discard some of them? Sure it doesn't matter in this case because they would go to the yard anyway, but I still need to know
Snow in Standard really misses having a big payoff like Abominable Treefolk or even Conifer Wurm. Most of the snow decks I've seen have been mono-blue tempo style decks.
I don't think it's quite good enough. We draw so many cards that we usually don't run out of things to play, and we'd rather be casting Treefolks or Wurms (or leveling up Ascendant Spirits) than turning lands into 4/4's.
I think that Caller can be powerful as a mana sink (if you don't have anything to do a 4/4 is better than letting your mana go to waste), but our deck has so much card draw and other mana sinks that we don't really need Caller.
This is my first modern deck. I’ve been playing commander, but wanted a change. I came up with the theme because I liked the snow lands theme. Turns out I’m not the first to come up with the idea lol. First tourney is tomorrow.
In match one, was I missing something with game 2 when he did not level up his Spirit to a 4/4 with flying for lethal. Did one of the goblins stop flying?
Opponent had sling gang lieutenant, which allows him to sac goblins to gain life. So he'd tap out, only have 1 blocker, and take a million on crack back.
For the non-budget build I splash into black because Dead of Winter is insane against creature decks. The mana is tough on a budget though. Really need Prismatic Vista and/or some other fetchlands.
(Typed at around 29:20) Aww no, I have counted several times 17 damage. I am not sure what you are not counting the power of. I am hoping you go for it or at least win.
Hi fellow mtg players. I bought this deck for mtgo and in paper. I like this deck a lot, it is fair and fun. But especially in best of 3 games, often the only thing I´m allowed to do is press "ok" and watch my deck getting demolished. Any suggestions for reasonable upgrades, that are not as pricy as force of negation? Thanks in advance
Does Reidane make snow lands strictly worse than regular lands? Obviously if you have snow payoffs they aren't but in a deck without payoffs. Are snow lands worth playing anymore?
I think in Standard and Historic it is enough of a reason to play normal basics (unless you have a snow payoff of some kind). In Modern I've never seen a Reidane. I don't think it sees any play at all, so I'm still find with playing snow basics there.
So in the last game of Match 2 vs JDS why not Winter's Rest the Shadow? Taps it down so it can't swing at you with the possibility of TBR. Even if Larry's gains 3 life, the Treefolk's Trample basically negates that. They might break even if not negative if they block with Lurrus. Worse case scenario, they're up one life with no Lurrus and a tapped out board while you still have a trampling Treefolk
This video made me build a 60 card kitchen table snow deck and it might be my favorite non-EDH deck I own Some of those snow payoffs are so comically overtuned lmao
Snow time! Great list. I hope we get more of these snow payoffs in Historic some day. Obligatory feedback about the intros: I can't stop cringing at them, I just can't.
@@MTGGoldfish My personal ranking is nothing = short spoiler >>> meme intro, but that's obviously subjective ^^ I think Treefolk is very much ok power level wise for historic. Here's to him in a future anthology !
It's insane how bad this deck looks compared to today's Modern landscape. The power creep is wild, because i remember watching this video when it released and thinking "okay, doesn't seem ultra competitive but fun as hell to play and get some wins" but nowadays it just seems straight up weak.
I thought the same thing, but sling-gang gains life so if he had done that he would've sacced a couple tokens to get out of lethal and done a lot of damage on the crack back.
The Snoop has to tap itself to make copies (unlike other Kiki combos where Kiki copies the creature, Snoop uses Kiki's ability from the top of the deck to copy itself, which require tapping), so you need another finisher (like putting Mogg Fanatic or Sling-Gang Lieutenant to the top of the deck) to win the game with the tapped Snoops.
Seth, please don't concede early at all when recording, I can always skip ahead in the video if a match goes long but I can't see you try to play to your outs if I want to. if it gets duller as the match goes on then you could edit it tighter. Vs control, I don't mind early scoops but you were so close to conceding against goblins when you finally decided to make them have it and you won
@@MTGGoldfish Really? They've been really good finishers, when I've played them, but I they might not do it in this build, where you're focused on trampling beaters.
First opponent played goblins so poorly. You have kiki, you make the tokens even if you can't combo right off. He would've won if he just make the snoop tokens
Sometimes the opponents played so badly and makes me think you should cover their names... I for one would be horrified if my terrible misplays were viewed by millions
Seth you could have player a island instead of a forrest. Smh. Such a rookie move. Lolz. Jk making fun of everyone telling you how to play like we all never make any mistakes. Great deck thanks Seth
This might legitimately be one of the best decks u've built for this section in a while
Thanks!
yay budget magic!!! best part of the goldfish Channel, great job Seth!
Thanks!
Lol the opponent in the first game first randomly had Kiki, and then shuffled into siege gang. So they actually could have killed you if they simply believed in the heart of the cards. But I guess they decided to just die
If I'm not mistaken Infinite Snoops was infinite Mana with Prospector, combined with the Ringleader they had in hand they should really have tried harder.
Opponent probably doesn't knownwhat scoop does. Infinite mana is pretty bonkers in scoop gobs, so many ways to win especially with a ringleader and playing the kiki from the deck. That's 6 cards to look at for a wincon or to keep chaining and even if you don't hit it you probably have at least 20 p/t on board.
Yeah, pretty heavy missplay on his side. Made my Goblin Player heart shatter into pieces :'(
They could made inifinite mana, dumped their hand and if that gave them enough blockers they could have used snoops ability at their endstep to keep an untapped snoop during Seth's turn then at Seth's endstep made inifite snoops to swing for the win next turn!
If they didn't have enough to block they could have played kiki off the top, played ringleader(then copy it) and possibly go from there!
That first game made me so sad to see.
The games are scripted.
“What doesn’t get hit by Path to Exile?”
Slippery Bogle
I thought the same thing lol as an Esper Bogles player.
@@winssports4830 esper bogles, im intrigued, can we get a decklist on much abrew maybe @mtggoldfish
I thought of Emrakul because it has come up before
Esper Bogles you say? Demonic Embrace perhaps?
@@Oko_Plz here's my deck list I actually don't think this is quite accurate anymore I've tweaked it a little since playing with it on MTGO. The Cleansing Wildfires are strictly bloodmoon tech because that card wrecked me lol. www.mtggoldfish.com/deck/1000247#paper
29:20 Match 3 Game 1 - 10 power Abominable Treefolk, 1 power Boreal, 1 power Augur 4 power Faceless Haven is 16 power by itself. So yeah, playing that one Frost Augur would make the Abominable 11 power, and give you 17 damage, unless I'm missing something.
Yes, thought the same
Good to know I'm not crazy, was thinking the same.
17 is a bit too high for my counting skill. I top at at 15.
Wow, it is frankly jaw-dropping to see Modern before MH2
That storm deck was wild.
I love snow decks, and the intro was awesome as well!
Augurs perform Auguries, rituals to divine the will of the gods/the future
I thought they drilled
But is there a verb? To perform auguries
@@xblful The verb is also "augur", so an augur augurs.
As despised as companions are, Jegantha can slot into a disturbingly high number of decks, this included.
@Who needs profile Pictures Really? It only makes the deck better. I suppose it eliminates a minute amount of bluff value, but additional options at near-to-no cost are always acceptable.
A free roll is a free roll.
Not that it mattered at all, but first game match three, you just had to play one Augur, and you'd be able to swing for lethal
Honestly, I love this deck so much. This is probably one of the most competitive budget modern decks I've seen here. You have so many different win cons creating pressure. This deck is fire.
Seems like most cards cost way too much where a lot of decks have like 1-3 mana costs
11:48 match 1 game 2, why don't power up ascendant that gains flying and is a 4/4 and go for lethal?
The opponent can sac Goblins to Sling-Gang Lieutenant to drain for one, so even if we pumped Ascendant up to four power it wouldn't actually be lethal .
Fun story, I Lived in the Rockies in middle school and we had so much snow in one January we were jumping off 2nd story roofs into snow like that.
Yeah, that happens on occasion in upstate New York too.
Man, imagine if astrolabe was still legal.
At 11:57 you say that you're looking for Blizzard Brawl with Glacial Revelation - but that spell can only get snow *permanents* into your hand and Blizzard Brawl is an instant ? Did you misspeak, are you looking to mill the card to recur it somehow - or am I missing something ?
Druid taps for snow mana to use with augur if I'm correct
Snow has become my favorite modern deck. Its abominable
Thinking about getting this deck for my first ever modern competition
During the Modern Horizons limited run, I forced 4 colour snow almost every time, and it was always competitive
Mostly because of Treefolk
Why did you reply to your own comment instead of editing or reposting it
Treefolk is so underrated!!!!
It is funny that he is surprised how well this deck performed when he played basically this deck back when modern horizons came out
aug- (1)
Proto-Indo-European root meaning "to increase." It forms all or part of: auction; augment; augmentative; augur; August; august; Augustus; author; authoritarian; authorize; auxiliary; auxin; eke (v.); inaugurate; nickname; waist; wax (v.1) "grow bigger or greater."
It appears that an auger does indeed aug
Great deck! You played the same opponent in match 2 and 4.
Intro is getting better. But if you have Seth real face would be amazing.
I tried experimenting with it, but my skill level still isn't quite there yet. SoonTM though.
I like the absolute clunkyness of having the drawn face tho
That was unfortunate for the opponent Match 1 Game 1. Had they created infinite Snoops while the Kikki was on the top of the deck then fetched they would have won with the
Sling-Gang Lieutenant for infinite damage. At the very least they would have had infinite Red Mana to cast whatever else was in their hand.
Yeah they really clutched defeat from the jaws of victory there.
Yeah that was basically scoop time from Seth (with ringleader it effectively was too), but alas.
That was the spiciest storm deck I've ever seen.
Why did Seth take damage at 22:12? The Goyf was blocked by the Coatl (even though it died to an instant the damage should not have gone to him right because the creature is still technically blocked)
Correct me if I'm wrong. I'm confused
he casted it during the declare attackers step, not the blockers step. It was killed in the same step, so it never actually got to block anything
@@jonarbuckle320 ah that makes sense thank you
29:30, Cast a one drop, Treefolk is 11, Boreal Druid and Frost Augur are 1 each, and activating the Haven is an additional 4. That makes 17 exactly
36:26 man does it feel good to shoot down Deaths Shadow and Goyf for the win with your budget deck
I love budget modern decks!
Nice deck!
I'd go and replace Three Seasons with Jorn (this deck can benefit greatly from mana advantage) and the 5 mana wurm with a 3/1 split of Saddled Rimestag/Blessing of Frost.
Jorn seems sweet although I'd really like to have black mana in the deck to play the backside on occasion (it's on the non-budget build).
@@MTGGoldfish I think he belongs in this version as well - he synergizes with pretty much everything :D
Played a version of this before kaldheim using almost the same set up and astrolabe to use on thin ice and dead of winter
Seth LOTR set has a spicy upgrade to thisdeck. Gladriel of lothrien + marit lage. pretty easy to hit 10 snow perms before turn 5
Last game, as soon as I saw you not immediatlely pass the turn and hold up one of your sideboard cards, I thought to myself, "Seth, how many times are you going to doubt that your opponent has the nuts before you learn your lesson." Worst case you wait one turn and you can just hold it up the rest of the game, 1 turn off vs storm to guarentee no instant death is definitely worth it. Worst case your opponent is stream sniping and they know you have the green storm instant, and they still have to storm at least 5 cards to get tibalt.
yeah he does this all the time hahaha can't just hedge your bets for a very minor upside
Please can we get Seth to actually act out these snow intros?
Ha, next winter once upstate New York is inevitable covered in snow, sure.
No
Whoa-ho-wowie! A video where we might get a creature, Conifer Wurm, with the P/Ts of some striking proportions! Here's hoping for an 18/18 that throws the quietus onto a opponent who paid for the Replacement Effect on a Shockland!
Am I wrong that glacial revelation can't dig for blizzard brawl? Only hits snow permanents... Right? Lol other than that great video seth!
Indeed, at 20:33 he reveals one and can't take it.
He talked about it in the intro
You are right, I'm was wrong :)
32:05 Ok, might not be a good idea to do this on a 2 year old video and not a more recent one, but why do people grab more cards than they need to off effects like Atraxa or glacial revelation if they are just going to discard some of them? Sure it doesn't matter in this case because they would go to the yard anyway, but I still need to know
Hi, what is the equivalent snow deck in standard? I know of mire triton, tymaret, narfi n three season
Snow in Standard really misses having a big payoff like Abominable Treefolk or even Conifer Wurm. Most of the snow decks I've seen have been mono-blue tempo style decks.
@@MTGGoldfish noted. Like brazen burrower etc
Why we don't play Jegantha?
Wish they played around with making a snow fetch for non basic snow lands , or a snow fetch cycle for basic snow lands.
Dang this deck really SNOWBALLS out of control around turn 4
why no avalanche caller?
Because Treefolk and Conifer Wurm do the same thing but better.
I don't think it's quite good enough. We draw so many cards that we usually don't run out of things to play, and we'd rather be casting Treefolks or Wurms (or leveling up Ascendant Spirits) than turning lands into 4/4's.
I think that Caller can be powerful as a mana sink (if you don't have anything to do a 4/4 is better than letting your mana go to waste), but our deck has so much card draw and other mana sinks that we don't really need Caller.
This is my first modern deck. I’ve been playing commander, but wanted a change. I came up with the theme because I liked the snow lands theme. Turns out I’m not the first to come up with the idea lol. First tourney is tomorrow.
In match one, was I missing something with game 2 when he did not level up his Spirit to a 4/4 with flying for lethal. Did one of the goblins stop flying?
They had sling gang the whole time, so they would have just gained a bunch
Opponent had sling gang lieutenant, which allows him to sac goblins to gain life. So he'd tap out, only have 1 blocker, and take a million on crack back.
Editing was *chef's kiss*
What do you think about splashing black into this for dead of winter? At least for the sideboard against creature based opponents
Dats cold
For the non-budget build I splash into black because Dead of Winter is insane against creature decks. The mana is tough on a budget though. Really need Prismatic Vista and/or some other fetchlands.
(Typed at around 29:20) Aww no, I have counted several times 17 damage. I am not sure what you are not counting the power of.
I am hoping you go for it or at least win.
Nobody is talking about how he played that guy in game 2 and game 4?
Title of the video had me dreaming of 6/4 Rancored Saddled Rimestags getting in the red zone
Let's see you play Tibalt Storm for Much Abrew!
Great deck! Proving that the owner of deck is the one winning not neccesary having a 2k usd. deck.
How would you improve the mana base of this deck?
Liked for the intro alone
12:00 why not just pump the spirit and hit for 5 in the air?
opp could in response sac couple goblins to gain back life with Sling-Gang Lieutenant.. so this line would need approximately 3 attacks to win
Hi fellow mtg players. I bought this deck for mtgo and in paper. I like this deck a lot, it is fair and fun. But especially in best of 3 games, often the only thing I´m allowed to do is press "ok" and watch my deck getting demolished. Any suggestions for reasonable upgrades, that are not as pricy as force of negation? Thanks in advance
Does Reidane make snow lands strictly worse than regular lands? Obviously if you have snow payoffs they aren't but in a deck without payoffs. Are snow lands worth playing anymore?
I think in Standard and Historic it is enough of a reason to play normal basics (unless you have a snow payoff of some kind). In Modern I've never seen a Reidane. I don't think it sees any play at all, so I'm still find with playing snow basics there.
So in the last game of Match 2 vs JDS why not Winter's Rest the Shadow? Taps it down so it can't swing at you with the possibility of TBR. Even if Larry's gains 3 life, the Treefolk's Trample basically negates that. They might break even if not negative if they block with Lurrus. Worse case scenario, they're up one life with no Lurrus and a tapped out board while you still have a trampling Treefolk
That game 1 goblins opponent... Shame shame, they got it and threw it away
True, it's possible they just fetched out of habit. Shame though.
I am a simple man. I see a funny intro, I press like.
I love snow, just made a jorn edh deck.
This video made me build a 60 card kitchen table snow deck and it might be my favorite non-EDH deck I own
Some of those snow payoffs are so comically overtuned lmao
Absolutely love the intro! Weeee!!!!
Snow time! Great list. I hope we get more of these snow payoffs in Historic some day.
Obligatory feedback about the intros: I can't stop cringing at them, I just can't.
Yeah, me too. Don't understand how do people find that funny
I'm wary of all feedback that comes from a "fan's perspective" which seems to be the case a lot here ^^
Not that I don't like Saffron.
Me too! If the put Abominable Treefolk into Historic Historic snow could be a thing!
On the intros, I think they are much better than spoiling gameplay with a clip of a cool moment.
@@MTGGoldfish My personal ranking is nothing = short spoiler >>> meme intro, but that's obviously subjective ^^
I think Treefolk is very much ok power level wise for historic. Here's to him in a future anthology !
Nice intro
There are two sets of snow duals, right?
One set with basic typings, one without
Half correct. There are five older snow duals, only in the allied colors.
@@kakashi37
Fair 👍
honestly tho, if gitaxian probe is banned mishra's bauble should be as well, especially now that lurrus is around
Wait isn't this a jengatha deck?
Match 2 was modern meme or dream
Can't stop laughing at the intro.
an augur performs auguries to divine the future
SULTAI version might be even more insane
Yeah, harder to pull off on a budget (you really need some fetchlands), but Dead of Winter is absurd and Jorn is also pretty sweet.
Is this the first time that Seth has played against the same opponent twice in one league? (Match 2 and 4)
Isn't this just a 2 player queue? I don't think this is a league.
Two Words for improving this deck:
*Ram Through*
Ohh, that might just be better than Blizzard Brawl. I'm going to have to give it a try.
@@MTGGoldfish ...why not both?
[Insert taco meme]
🎶I swear I did this intro once already🎶
🎶The same old gifs and memes to selllllllll~🎶
Let it snow
It's insane how bad this deck looks compared to today's Modern landscape. The power creep is wild, because i remember watching this video when it released and thinking "okay, doesn't seem ultra competitive but fun as hell to play and get some wins" but nowadays it just seems straight up weak.
Why are people suggesting Jegantha? Walk me through that.
11:50 you could have ascended the spirit and hit for 4!!!! 3 mana and you get a 4/4 with flying!! SETH SETH SETHHHHHHHHHHHH!
I thought so too, but opp could've just sacced 3 goblins to kill the Spirit, i think... I still would've tried it, but that wasn't a guaranteed win 😅😅
I thought the same thing, but sling-gang gains life so if he had done that he would've sacced a couple tokens to get out of lethal and done a lot of damage on the crack back.
Yeah, Sling-Gang Lieutenants life gain was the problem.
“Let’s glacial revelation looking for blizzard brawl” lmao classic Seth not understanding how his cards work
Why no play bear over wurm? Bear go brrr
I do not understand why the opponent in game 1 didn't make infinite snoops then attack. The copies have haste.
They'd be tapped.
@@mrlescure why? When you copy a creature, you dont copy that its tapped
@@mariahanover9335 because Snoop copies Kikki’s effect which has an activation cost of tapping itself.
The Snoop has to tap itself to make copies (unlike other Kiki combos where Kiki copies the creature, Snoop uses Kiki's ability from the top of the deck to copy itself, which require tapping), so you need another finisher (like putting Mogg Fanatic or Sling-Gang Lieutenant to the top of the deck) to win the game with the tapped Snoops.
Weird to see modern decks before MH2 tbh
Seth, please don't concede early at all when recording, I can always skip ahead in the video if a match goes long but I can't see you try to play to your outs if I want to. if it gets duller as the match goes on then you could edit it tighter. Vs control, I don't mind early scoops but you were so close to conceding against goblins when you finally decided to make them have it and you won
Why has bauble not been banned yet? Lurrus and Urza clearly show that 0 mana artifacts can't exist in modern
No Avalanche Callers?... hmmm...
I don't think it's good enough, sadly :(
@@MTGGoldfish Really? They've been really good finishers, when I've played them, but I they might not do it in this build, where you're focused on trampling beaters.
Do you study something personally? I read literature like seldomly...it's abhorrent but what I get to read sometimes I'm happy for...
The goblin player could have made infinite mana but chose not to...
Eu vou manda aquele último weee
I though the intro was an add
Ah, the Modern Horiizons/Kaldheim draft chaff deck
2nd. Blizzard time
The goblin playera should win but he did not play to win
@ 36:27 if you listen closely you can hear Richard crying in the background
Why is everyone in modern playing Boil? I mean, I'm all for it, but it's crazy.
Good against Amulet Titan specifically, also good sideboard tech against any blue based deck.
Can this bear ur prowess
Dead of winter too good not to play. Sultai snow is possible.
damn you played against the worst goblin player ever i think
First opponent played goblins so poorly. You have kiki, you make the tokens even if you can't combo right off. He would've won if he just make the snoop tokens
Sometimes the opponents played so badly and makes me think you should cover their names... I for one would be horrified if my terrible misplays were viewed by millions
They shouldn't feel bad, sometime I play so badly I should cover my name too ;)
Seth you could have player a island instead of a forrest. Smh. Such a rookie move. Lolz. Jk making fun of everyone telling you how to play like we all never make any mistakes. Great deck thanks Seth