Ambos alcançam as notas, o que diferencia é o timbre, é o que dá a impressão que Bruno alcança mais suave e que Michael alcança mais ríspido por causa do seu drive.
@@juninhofernando7573 Michael Jackson era bom em TD em q se tratava de música ou dança . Eu sou fã do Bruno Mars tbm eu olho para ele e vejo o Michael 🤩
TOTALLY different. Bruno is smooth and jazzy and very open - Michael sounds like his whole body is an instrument, thin but strong notes, more focused intensity. I prefer them each to their own songs. This is just purely on vocals. As a live performer Michael holds the stage like no other.
@@laurendy5534 he does. We love Bruno! MJ is just something ELSE. as in you go to a village in anywhere in the world and people will know his name, 20 years later.
Na minha opinião só Bruno Mars se aproxima do talento vocal de Michael Jackson. Porém igual jamais... sou fã do Bruno, mas ambos são de estilos diferentes, tempos diferentes. MJ voz e talento incomparáveis.
Né isso mano? Kkkk comparam ele com todos os novos cantores, comparam ele com Chris Brown... Justin Timberlake... Bruno Mars... The Weeknd... e nenhum deles Barra Michael kkkk é o desespero parece que desde que Michael morreu querem achar outro pra substitui-lo mas nunca vão conseguir! Michael Jackson melhor do mundo pra sempre.
O Michael tem um mix PERFEITO! As pessoas que estão dizendo que ele faz com "tensão", estão completamente equivocados. Isso se chama drive, algo que o Michael era expert. Ele fez aula com o Seth Rigs, que entende muito sobre voz mista e speech level sing. Enfim, uma eterna lenda. Mas a minha opinião é: Bruno. O timbre dele é muito lindoooo!
Michael tem G#5 misto AO VIVO com relativa facilidade, então, também acho equívoco do pessoal falar que ele se esforça mais nas notas. Mas é isso. Eu, sinceramente, não saberia escolher quem dos dois prefiro, porque ambos são foda ... kkkk deixo o abacaxi pra vcs. kkk
@@laurendy5534 But he could. He lost some range as he left his 20s due to constant performing and touring from age 5, he never had a chance for full vocal development. That said I 5ake 5 year old MJ over adult BM anyway.
Bruno was impressive but l go Miike on this one. Both has some serious vocal range. Hard to get past the distinctness of MJ voice though. Nobody really sounds like him except his nephew
Its Obviously Bruno Mars has a powerfull Voice but they have the difference that made them UNIQUE. I Love Bruno Mars and Michael Jackson they are OUTSTANDING PERFORMERS
Gosto muito dos dois,eu só queria entender como o bruno consegue ter uma voz tão frontal mesmo na voz de peito,é uma técnica que eu queria muito aprender,a ter essa leveza no agudo que ele e tbm o mj possuem. Sou tenor e tambem consigo realizar notas até o D5(limite da extensão)só que quando passo para notas da voz de peito geralmente em G4 eu noto uma impostação na minha voz e eu queria "tirar isso" pois admiro muito a voz projetada frontalmente como o bruno e o mj. Caso alguém que leu o comentário saiba como posso fazer isso com exercício vocal(e o nome do exercício) por favor comenta ai
@@gingerbreadman581 rapaz, eu não sei bem disso porquê até ontem ele estava gravando stories no insta com o mesmo vigor e notas altas com qualidade, mas não sei, também pode ser que esteja já acontecendo isso com a voz dele.
@@GabrielSouza-yr3qr ele tentou cantar i know where i've been uns meses atrás, e na metade da música já parecia estar forçando bastaaaante pra fazer o mesmo de antes. Enfim, espero que ele tenha melhorado...
Impossível escolher um. Bruno conseguiu chegar no nível de talento de Michael. Em questão de tamanho é grandeza, isso será impossível. Mas, tecnicamente. Bruno é tão bom quanto.
Cant decide but to me it seems bruno wins he sounds like a better singer and michael is my dad for music...I heard bruno sang billie jean while playing guitar and the part that said "she says I'm the one".....he hits it easier than michael so I believe bruno is a more stronger singer and bruno has never done lip sync when performing and he dances also but mj has......but we all know that bruno learn from mj elvis and all these greats so its expected for him to be better than who he learn from like mj did
Michael tiene muchas épocas diferentes !! ...Sin contar la infantil que era de otro planeta. ! ...la época de juventud su voz tuvo una época inestable hasta más o menos los 18 años que maduro y su voz ganó una facilidad arriba única ..y fue mejorando hasta el disco Bad ...en esa época su voz era más brillante que la de Bruno !! A partir de Dangerous su voz se hace más dura y menos flexible pero aprende a utilizar más matices en su voz ...Bruno ahora esta en muy buen nivel pero si lo comparo con la época de Jackson desde los 20 años hasta los 35 aprox Michael gana!
hooligans.. chill out, we don't have to fight over biased fans. we just know at this part, both of them are great artist and we know how much Bruno love MN. at this poin, we proud to stan a great artis who has the first and only 5 diamond singles 🥂
@@daeveionwilliams4825I dont remeber Michael for his long and powerful belts, but for his insane control of dynamics, and the percussive/rhythmic/speed elements of his voice. His adult voice was very thin and though he could darken it and distort his high notes quite a bit he wasnt the kind of lad to sustain them. Bruno on the other hand doesnt play with dynamics quite as much, neither does he use falsetto that much but opts to stay in chest voice and, has a darker fatter upper range than Michael which didnt thin out the higher he went. What Bruno does have over Michael are strong belts and thus far in his live career a perfect streak of world class performances that are 100 percent live, something Michael didnt have by his third solo tour.But to be fair Michaels dance moves were a lot more aggressive and thus mustve costed him a lot of breath and energy.Other than for his dance breaks, Bruno has built a collection of dance moves rhat are always very flow-like and passive and therefore allow him to keep his breath while wowing audiences
Bruno mars yes because he has a great voice, he's from my generation, I use to be a micheal jackson fan but until i found out bruno mars, i quit listening to micheal jackson, Bruno is very nice
Eu como fã de Michael Jackson troquei os dois são grandes cantores tanto Bruno Mars quanto Michael Jackson tem por que comparações Por que são vozes completamente diferentes e os dois não são iguais artisticamente falando físico sem lembra mas a voz não é identificar
I don't either other than the fact that they're both tenors there's not a lot of similarity. I love Bruno mars, Freddie mercury, George Michael. They are all amazing singers and performers. But Michael's pitch was perfect like robotically perfect and none of those other three great singers have that perfect consistent vocal pitch and precision. there are a lot of great singers and artists and performers and the three I mentioned are up there at the top that Michael was a musical being almost like not of this world which is why I think everybody felt he was strange. He wasn't strange he was incredibly unique both by his talent his early performing his upbringing. Both nature and nurture combine to make him one of the most unique people that ever lived. So bad for him if you think he was really lonely and felt outside because of that. It's like they're amazing show horses but Michael is a unicorn
Not really. Michael became less acrobatics, but his stylistic voice peaked in his 30s which ultimately is untouchable. Look at songs like stranger in Moscow, earth song or they dont care about us and tell me bruno could sing those songs.
Tem tantos shows do Michael fazendo um agudo tão perfeito que ele supera muitos cantores de hj em dia com os agudos Como assim essa e a única vez que Michael Jackson aparece nesse canal??? Quando se faz um canal analisando a voz dos cantores Michael e o primeiro que vem na cabeça jkkkkk
Michael Jackson became first but the best between the 2 is Bruno Mars as a musician he composed lot of hits songs for many singers and can play instruments and also can dance where MJ is for sing dance only although he arranged some of revival songs
no hay que olvidar que en la mayoria o algunas de las canciones que aparecen de bruno mars tienen autotune lo cual le da mas merito a michael por solo ser su voz
Mochael Jackson é melhro vey Enquanto que bruno mars só consegue fazer a mesma tonalidade da voz ou seja,nas suas músicas nao há tanta diferença do que outra,Michael já ocnsegue deixar uma música mais entonada do que otra,além disso a voz dele era "limpa" tinha o mesmo desempenho nos shows do que nas gravações,além disso,abordava temas mais fortes
You old heads are just nostalgic Bruno- better singer, better live performer, beter entertainer, better song writer, better musician,can play multiple instruments,better dancer MJ- wider vocal range, better vocals, more popular
Michael Jackson won theirs no need to compare Michael to another pop singer MICHAEL IS THE KING and those who picked Bruno Mars have no taste of good music AT ALL and that’s just awful nothing can go wrong with the king of pop R.I.P Michael Joseph Jackson from 1958 to 2009 I miss him very much and I’m actually an impersonator of him it’s very fun see you later moonwalkers ;)
@@aniketkumar197 It is. Look at what MJ achieved by Bruno's age. Bruno is the latest in a string of MJ copycats, he was even an impersonator, lol. When his career is equal to or excels MJ, then you'll have a point.
@@claricelyles8398 ya I agree that bruno hasn't achieved what Michael did.. And perhaps no one would.. Bt here the video is about vocals.. And Bruno is one hell of a singer.. So the vocal Comparison ain't ridiculous.. Thts wat i said.. And also if being inspired by an artist is being a copy cat.. Then i don't even want to get into an argument with someone who thinks tht.. Lmao.. I don't even know what makes you say so.. Bruno atleast writes and produces his own stuffs.. Has his own original voice and music... So ur point is invalid.. Bruno is bruno who has been inspired by the likes of James brown and mj and stevie wonder etc.. He is no mj nor is mj a Bruno.. And neither does he try to be a mj...u shud actually make yourself aware of what Bruno says about MJ.. He respects him like hell and clearly stated there is nvr gonna be a second mj..lol
@@aniketkumar197 I called him a copycat, because he was an MJ IMPERSONATOR and now he uses the influencein his act, dingy: hookedoneverything.com/bruno-mars/ MJ wrote plenty of his own music, dumb dumb, to the point that he's in the Songwriter's hall of fame: www.billboard.com/articles/news/75404/jackson-manilow-sting-inducted-into-songwriter-hall/ I don't give a damn what he thinks about MJ, hon. I do not respect him as an artist but, yeah, he is a good singer. Good for him. Once again, despite MJ's decline he was his own type of vocalist and this is why others are compared to him, he's not compared to anyone else, vocally. MJ is no Bruno because he's better than him. So yeah, you have a point there, lol. You don't see folks comparing Brian McKnight to Michael because B McKnight is not a copycat and it makes no sense to compare them because they don't sound alike. You take care😘
@@sophiamoe7783 Michael knew how to use his voice very well, but I think the approach was a little more aggressive, while Bruno's proposal is something softer and more romantic
@@gualmeida9809 Their natural voices are different, but both men use different techniques and approaches: Michael brightened his voice a little and Bruno uses too much chest dominant tones to achieve a darker sound.
michael my king, no competition here MICHAEL WON
@Shashwat mishra of course not
@Shashwat mishra no he's not
@Shashwat mishra He’s not. Bruno is trash compared to Michael. Michael is the king of pop.
@@wg6431 ok sure whatever you say
Yes
King of pop and regular
Micheal jackson wins in my opinion
Michael Jackson sempre ❤
Ambos alcançam as notas, o que diferencia é o timbre, é o que dá a impressão que Bruno alcança mais suave e que Michael alcança mais ríspido por causa do seu drive.
Olha as épocas, os instrumentos
Estúdios, edição. Tem comparação não, hoje Michael seria muito melhor que antes.
Michael é melhor na voz e na dança
@@juninhofernando7573 Michael Jackson era bom em TD em q se tratava de música ou dança . Eu sou fã do Bruno Mars tbm eu olho para ele e vejo o Michael 🤩
@@juninhofernando7573 só na dança
@@mateuss5754 sim mas é injusto compara isso pq não significa que ele ia ser o melhor
TOTALLY different. Bruno is smooth and jazzy and very open - Michael sounds like his whole body is an instrument, thin but strong notes, more focused intensity. I prefer them each to their own songs. This is just purely on vocals. As a live performer Michael holds the stage like no other.
BlushGush bruno Mars is more creative with his voice. I’ve seen some vocal teachers say Bruno is a better singer, and has a more warmer voice as well.
But Bruno also kills it on live performances
@@laurendy5534 he does. We love Bruno! MJ is just something ELSE. as in you go to a village in anywhere in the world and people will know his name, 20 years later.
@@cowboys2145 creative? No bro
This is a Pure vocal better
Michael jackson WIN
Na minha opinião só Bruno Mars se aproxima do talento vocal de Michael Jackson. Porém igual jamais... sou fã do Bruno, mas ambos são de estilos diferentes, tempos diferentes. MJ voz e talento incomparáveis.
Michael is the pop's king
Okay, but the video is not about being the pop king or not
@@0fi3trixz88is just her /his opinion stop
@@oliwiakryczek32 ik but i wasn't attacking her, wdym?
Michael Jackson period
Michael eu ainda não sei como existe comparaçoes com vc , gente ele é insubstituivel e insuperavel
Né isso mano? Kkkk comparam ele com todos os novos cantores, comparam ele com Chris Brown... Justin Timberlake... Bruno Mars... The Weeknd... e nenhum deles Barra Michael kkkk é o desespero parece que desde que Michael morreu querem achar outro pra substitui-lo mas nunca vão conseguir! Michael Jackson melhor do mundo pra sempre.
O Michael tem um mix PERFEITO!
As pessoas que estão dizendo que ele faz com "tensão", estão completamente equivocados. Isso se chama drive, algo que o Michael era expert.
Ele fez aula com o Seth Rigs, que entende muito sobre voz mista e speech level sing. Enfim, uma eterna lenda.
Mas a minha opinião é: Bruno. O timbre dele é muito lindoooo!
Michael tem G#5 misto AO VIVO com relativa facilidade, então, também acho equívoco do pessoal falar que ele se esforça mais nas notas. Mas é isso. Eu, sinceramente, não saberia escolher quem dos dois prefiro, porque ambos são foda ... kkkk deixo o abacaxi pra vcs. kkk
@@AnaliseVocal eu gostaria muito de saber como que faz g#5
@@joaofacundo.j912 vocal range simples
Michael wins..😘😘😘
Michael can reach other notes Bruno can't reach
Bruno can do full belt, Michael can't.
@@laurendy5534 michael can
True Michael💞💕
Every professional singer can belt lol
@@laurendy5534 But he could. He lost some range as he left his 20s due to constant performing and touring from age 5, he never had a chance for full vocal development. That said I 5ake 5 year old MJ over adult BM anyway.
I say Michael takes this one. His vocals are just more special, unique and representative in my opinion.
Bruno was impressive but l go Miike on this one. Both has some serious vocal range. Hard to get past the distinctness of MJ voice though. Nobody really sounds like him except his nephew
Michael jackson kral
Its Obviously Bruno Mars has a powerfull Voice but they have the difference that made them UNIQUE.
I Love Bruno Mars and Michael Jackson they are OUTSTANDING PERFORMERS
Michael Jackson!
Gosto muito dos dois,eu só queria entender como o bruno consegue ter uma voz tão frontal mesmo na voz de peito,é uma técnica que eu queria muito aprender,a ter essa leveza no agudo que ele e tbm o mj possuem.
Sou tenor e tambem consigo realizar notas até o D5(limite da extensão)só que quando passo para notas da voz de peito geralmente em G4 eu noto uma impostação na minha voz e eu queria "tirar isso" pois admiro muito a voz projetada frontalmente como o bruno e o mj.
Caso alguém que leu o comentário saiba como posso fazer isso com exercício vocal(e o nome do exercício) por favor comenta ai
Nobody can't sing EARTH SONG like MICHAEL! Michael king
Prefiro o rei do pop Michael Jackson
Michaele Jackson e il migliore
Michael Jackson
Both have amazing voices I can tell based on Bruno's msuic he took alot of inspiration from mj.
Acho ambos incríveis nas notas altas, mas Michael... Sem muito o que falar né? 💙
Faz um do Adam Lambert e Alex Newell.
Up
Alex newell lenda... pena que está perdendo a voz naturalmente.
@@gingerbreadman581 rapaz, eu não sei bem disso porquê até ontem ele estava gravando stories no insta com o mesmo vigor e notas altas com qualidade, mas não sei, também pode ser que esteja já acontecendo isso com a voz dele.
@@GabrielSouza-yr3qr ele tentou cantar i know where i've been uns meses atrás, e na metade da música já parecia estar forçando bastaaaante pra fazer o mesmo de antes. Enfim, espero que ele tenha melhorado...
@@gingerbreadman581 não vi isso, mas enfim... Espero também que esteja tudo bem.
Prefiro Michael
I love mj
Only mj
Battle? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Sorry no battle here.
Y??
For the ones who don’t know, Michael’s voice is like one octave deeper that Bruno’s so it’s harder to hit those hight notes.
Impossível escolher um. Bruno conseguiu chegar no nível de talento de Michael. Em questão de tamanho é grandeza, isso será impossível. Mas, tecnicamente. Bruno é tão bom quanto.
Duas vozes incríveis e ambos talentos!
Mas a escolha é difícil rs
Então,pra mim,é empate técnico.
Bruno👑
Michael Jackson e o rei do pop
Cant decide but to me it seems bruno wins he sounds like a better singer and michael is my dad for music...I heard bruno sang billie jean while playing guitar and the part that said "she says I'm the one".....he hits it easier than michael so I believe bruno is a more stronger singer and bruno has never done lip sync when performing and he dances also but mj has......but we all know that bruno learn from mj elvis and all these greats so its expected for him to be better than who he learn from like mj did
😂
Lol! MJ By Miles!!!!! No comparison
Os dois canta muito bem, mas incrível a Agilidade do Bruno Mars.
Michael Jackson é único 🤩👑
Michel Jackson faz drive com speaking ,é por isso que sai esse som meio forçado
Michael Jackson!
Michael tiene muchas épocas diferentes !! ...Sin contar la infantil que era de otro planeta. ! ...la época de juventud su voz tuvo una época inestable hasta más o menos los 18 años que maduro y su voz ganó una facilidad arriba única ..y fue mejorando hasta el disco Bad ...en esa época su voz era más brillante que la de Bruno !! A partir de Dangerous su voz se hace más dura y menos flexible pero aprende a utilizar más matices en su voz ...Bruno ahora esta en muy buen nivel pero si lo comparo con la época de Jackson desde los 20 años hasta los 35 aprox Michael gana!
Michael Jackson king
Michael of course!
hooligans.. chill out, we don't have to fight over biased fans. we just know at this part, both of them are great artist and we know how much Bruno love MN. at this poin, we proud to stan a great artis who has the first and only 5 diamond singles 🥂
Bruno is actually a better belter and his notes are so full.
Debatable
@@daeveionwilliams4825I dont remeber Michael for his long and powerful belts, but for his insane control of dynamics, and the percussive/rhythmic/speed elements of his voice. His adult voice was very thin and though he could darken it and distort his high notes quite a bit he wasnt the kind of lad to sustain them. Bruno on the other hand doesnt play with dynamics quite as much, neither does he use falsetto that much but opts to stay in chest voice and, has a darker fatter upper range than Michael which didnt thin out the higher he went. What Bruno does have over Michael are strong belts and thus far in his live career a perfect streak of world class performances that are 100 percent live, something Michael didnt have by his third solo tour.But to be fair Michaels dance moves were a lot more aggressive and thus mustve costed him a lot of breath and energy.Other than for his dance breaks, Bruno has built a collection of dance moves rhat are always very flow-like and passive and therefore allow him to keep his breath while wowing audiences
@@matiaspereyra9375 I like Bruno Mars better
Bruno mars yes because he has a great voice, he's from my generation, I use to be a micheal jackson fan but until i found out bruno mars, i quit listening to micheal jackson, Bruno is very nice
@@melbayguy maybe a person who likes bruno mars
Bruno pode ter umas das melhores vozes desta geração mas não tem como comparar com mj,é uma loucura oque ele fazia ao vivo
Of course Michael Jackson
I really HATE when people make ridiculous comparisons between artists but it specially pisses me off when they "COMPARE" Michael with other artists.
Bruno for sure
Bruno has more vocals but Michael has a sweeter tone
Bruno Mars levou a melhor...
Mas prefiro o Michael a😘
Tbm concordo, Michael tem um estilo único de cantar
Não acho não.
Ig I’m the only one who thinks Bruno has better vocals.. but since it’s mj popular vote makes him lose
they reached F#5 with their falsetto, not fair
It's mixed head.
Bruno did mj can go higher with his head voice
Eu como fã de Michael Jackson troquei os dois são grandes cantores tanto Bruno Mars quanto Michael Jackson tem por que comparações Por que são vozes completamente diferentes e os dois não são iguais artisticamente falando físico sem lembra mas a voz não é identificar
Idk why but I feel like they sound a little similar
I don't either other than the fact that they're both tenors there's not a lot of similarity. I love Bruno mars, Freddie mercury, George Michael. They are all amazing singers and performers. But Michael's pitch was perfect like robotically perfect and none of those other three great singers have that perfect consistent vocal pitch and precision. there are a lot of great singers and artists and performers and the three I mentioned are up there at the top that Michael was a musical being almost like not of this world which is why I think everybody felt he was strange. He wasn't strange he was incredibly unique both by his talent his early performing his upbringing. Both nature and nurture combine to make him one of the most unique people that ever lived. So bad for him if you think he was really lonely and felt outside because of that. It's like they're amazing show horses but Michael is a unicorn
@@mlduree yes Michael is pitch perfect
Michael é incrível mas timbre do meu Bruno simplesmente é perfeitoooooooooo não vamos negar que a técnica vocal dele é top
Michael Jackson da
Brono Mars ooo yuk
Michael Jackson gagne
Dude it's hard both incredible in their own level
The one and only king of pop
Michele's voice was versatile
Michael Jackson won definitely I hate brono Mars
From a teenager to late 20s Michael is a better singer. And from 30s Bruno takes over and if you think otherwise you're biased
Not really. Michael became less acrobatics, but his stylistic voice peaked in his 30s which ultimately is untouchable. Look at songs like stranger in Moscow, earth song or they dont care about us and tell me bruno could sing those songs.
dnt compare both legend one is dead one is alive but when u said musician i go for Bruno
The father and the son. 👨👦
Sabia que ia rolar uma "batalha" entre esses dois 👏👏👏
Aku merasa music bruno mars banyak mendapatkan inspirasi dari michael jackson
they're definitely dad and son
Michael Jackson maluco muito além na música de todo mundo.
Tem tantos shows do Michael fazendo um agudo tão perfeito que ele supera muitos cantores de hj em dia com os agudos
Como assim essa e a única vez que Michael Jackson aparece nesse canal??? Quando se faz um canal analisando a voz dos cantores Michael e o primeiro que vem na cabeça jkkkkk
Michael Jackson became first but the best between the 2 is Bruno Mars as a musician he composed lot of hits songs for many singers and can play instruments and also can dance where MJ is for sing dance only although he arranged some of revival songs
Tem que ser ser foda,PAI e FILHO,pelo amor de Deus neh!!!
Respect to Bruno Mars, he can go toe to toe with anyone
no hay que olvidar que en la mayoria o algunas de las canciones que aparecen de bruno mars tienen autotune lo cual le da mas merito a michael por solo ser su voz
Muito legal
Isnt michael higher than bruno
Mochael Jackson é melhro vey
Enquanto que bruno mars só consegue fazer a mesma tonalidade da voz ou seja,nas suas músicas nao há tanta diferença do que outra,Michael já ocnsegue deixar uma música mais entonada do que otra,além disso a voz dele era "limpa" tinha o mesmo desempenho nos shows do que nas gravações,além disso,abordava temas mais fortes
This is so stupid..... But anwY.....
ambos suenan similares
スタイル、顔、歌声とダンスともマイケルの方が上だわ。❇🎵💖
Not comparable mj all the way
bruno in my opinion
Faz um do Adam Lambert vs Bruno Mars
HEEE HEEEEEEE
Michael he is the music
Não imaginava Maicon Jackson ser Tenor😂😍
Isso é bem obvio neh
O timbre dele era beeeeem agundinho já falando
Chega a parecer contratenor em algumas músicas
Ele tem a voz mais fina que a do Bruno lógico que é tenor kk
Bruno Mars é melhor
You old heads are just nostalgic
Bruno- better singer, better live performer, beter entertainer, better song writer, better musician,can play multiple instruments,better dancer
MJ- wider vocal range, better vocals, more popular
I can't get over how similar they both look and sound, especially younger Michael 😳
Michael Jackson won theirs no need to compare Michael to another pop singer MICHAEL IS THE KING and those who picked Bruno Mars have no taste of good music AT ALL and that’s just awful nothing can go wrong with the king of pop R.I.P Michael Joseph Jackson from 1958 to 2009 I miss him very much and I’m actually an impersonator of him it’s very fun see you later moonwalkers ;)
Bruno forever
father and son
Mj❤💋
Michael won I hate Bruce mars he is trash Michael won I love u Michael
Tal pai tal filho
Michael jackson efsane idol
If the chest voice i think bruno mars win
You comparing Micheal with Bruno🤣🤣🤣🤣 lmao
It's not tht ridiculous 🤡🤡
@@aniketkumar197 It is. Look at what MJ achieved by Bruno's age. Bruno is the latest in a string of MJ copycats, he was even an impersonator, lol. When his career is equal to or excels MJ, then you'll have a point.
@@claricelyles8398 ya I agree that bruno hasn't achieved what Michael did.. And perhaps no one would.. Bt here the video is about vocals.. And Bruno is one hell of a singer.. So the vocal Comparison ain't ridiculous.. Thts wat i said.. And also if being inspired by an artist is being a copy cat.. Then i don't even want to get into an argument with someone who thinks tht.. Lmao.. I don't even know what makes you say so.. Bruno atleast writes and produces his own stuffs.. Has his own original voice and music... So ur point is invalid.. Bruno is bruno who has been inspired by the likes of James brown and mj and stevie wonder etc.. He is no mj nor is mj a Bruno.. And neither does he try to be a mj...u shud actually make yourself aware of what Bruno says about MJ.. He respects him like hell and clearly stated there is nvr gonna be a second mj..lol
@@aniketkumar197 I called him a copycat, because he was an MJ IMPERSONATOR and now he uses the influencein his act, dingy: hookedoneverything.com/bruno-mars/
MJ wrote plenty of his own music, dumb dumb, to the point that he's in the Songwriter's hall of fame:
www.billboard.com/articles/news/75404/jackson-manilow-sting-inducted-into-songwriter-hall/
I don't give a damn what he thinks about MJ, hon. I do not respect him as an artist but, yeah, he is a good singer. Good for him. Once again, despite MJ's decline he was his own type of vocalist and this is why others are compared to him, he's not compared to anyone else, vocally. MJ is no Bruno because he's better than him. So yeah, you have a point there, lol. You don't see folks comparing Brian McKnight to Michael because B McKnight is not a copycat and it makes no sense to compare them because they don't sound alike. You take care😘
@@aniketkumar197 MJ is no Bruno because he's better than him. So yeah, you have a point there, lol
Brunoの方が上手いと思うなぁ
俺もMichaelは好きやけど…
若者ゆえ？
Bruno has a lighter and higher voice than Michael.
More acute I find it difficult. Bruno's voice is softer
@@gualmeida9809 Bruno is a Tenorino while Michael was a smaller Lyric Tenor.
@@sophiamoe7783 Michael knew how to use his voice very well, but I think the approach was a little more aggressive, while Bruno's proposal is something softer and more romantic
@@gualmeida9809 Their natural voices are different, but both men use different techniques and approaches: Michael brightened his voice a little and Bruno uses too much chest dominant tones to achieve a darker sound.
@@sophiamoe7783 Yesssss