Porsche Macan vs Range Rover Evoque: the ultimate review

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ต.ค. 2024
  • We test every version of the new Porsche Macan on road, off road, and on track. We've even compared it to the Range Rover Evoque. More: bit.ly/1eQgLHo
    Subscribe to our TH-cam channel bit.ly/11Ad1j1
    Subscribe to the mag subscribe.autoe...

ความคิดเห็น • 117

  • @151515priscila
    @151515priscila 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Bought an Evoque 6 months ago and it has broken down on me twice! Stuck with 5k in repairs. That’s why I am here considering switching to a Porsche 🤔

  • @auxil47
    @auxil47 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In the market for an SUV thats fast and functional, was considering the Range Rover but too much poor reviews. Saw your review on the Macan and that sold it for me, thanks mate, a proper car review.

  • @DreamCarGarage1
    @DreamCarGarage1 10 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    The Evoque is a much funkier design but its lack of engines on the whole leave it woefully underpowered. And in another way they're a victim of their own success as these things are the absolute opposite of exclusive. In the UK they're EVERYWHERE!

  • @umarluxat7174
    @umarluxat7174 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    FANTASTIC insinuation , 0.07 - 0.10 then 2.20 - 2.59 . Well done guys .

  • @etonthompson5175
    @etonthompson5175 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Ok. So the Macan is not as off-road capable as the Evoque. However here in Jamaica the roads are basically one big off road trail. They are that bad. So the Evoque would have a leg up. Having said that though, love the Macan.

  • @googlereviewer1944
    @googlereviewer1944 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great review. That Mecan is stunning. Drives as well as the Evoque looks.

  • @seinsmeld13
    @seinsmeld13 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent review as always! Cheers from Canada.

  • @Haladharr
    @Haladharr 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Surprisingly enjoyed the Range Rover Evoque "borrowing" scene lol.... Think I woke up my wife laughing though; it's 6 am in the morning see.

  • @Wolfie387
    @Wolfie387 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Owned both and the Macan 3.0v6 petrol is the best against all of its competitors...by a long margin.

  • @mokeydluffy4366
    @mokeydluffy4366 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    5:07 is the best part! loved the review by the way!

  • @day3002
    @day3002 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    it looks great. I was thinking about buying nissan or Kia next summer. this looks great. oh if it was 10k£ cheaper then maybe.

    • @kiwikozo
      @kiwikozo 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Approved used one would probably be a good option if you aren't getting one until the summer of 2015.

  • @JohnInSale
    @JohnInSale 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice non-biased review !!!
    It would be nice to hear the actual price of the test car, rather than the base price that no-one ever buys etc

  • @adrborn8127
    @adrborn8127 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Why is everybody comparing the Macan to the Evoque? Surely the most direct competitor for the Macan is the Audi Q5, especially the SQ5.

  • @mujib5033
    @mujib5033 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great job Matt.

  • @HesteBremse
    @HesteBremse 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very subjective but somehow I like the Evoque better for it´s more striking exterior design, but the Macan is really really good and surely the better drivers car. It also looks better than the competition and it´s big brother. If one has the money and want this kind of car, Porsche have now made it and easy choice.
    ( Now give me a Evoque with the V8 diesel from the Range Rover Sport ;)

  • @DreamCarGarage1
    @DreamCarGarage1 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Really don't like the odd black plastic protector down the side, O and that front grille is still awful but apart from that it's a sweet looking thing. But if we're talking sporty SUV diesels you simply can't look past its close relative the Audi SQ5. Almost 350 bhp with crazy torque and performance figures to match. No less special inside either. It's a close call but as they're both around the same money it's got to be the Audi SQ5 for me. Whoch would you guys choose?

    • @way2deep100
      @way2deep100 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I agree about the value; the Audi is actually considerably cheaper if you load them up. But if it's ground-covering performance rather than outright power you're after, the Macan will probably be the one. Personally, I think the Macan looks too ordinary. From the side it could be a raised version of a family hatch. The SQ5 suffers from being based on the ageing Q5 but I'd still choose it, I think.

  • @miradelgado5966
    @miradelgado5966 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'd rather prefer the new SEAT Ateca. It's cheaper than these and it takes you everywhere too. ;-). Greetings from Spain!

  • @steventhoseby
    @steventhoseby 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can't see how they could fit the BiTDI engine from the Audi SQ5. Technically it could be done but it would make the Macan S redundant! I think for now if you want a REALLY quick small Diesel SUV then the BMW X3 35D M Sport or Audi SQ5 would offer greater straight line speed. As for the Evoque, a competitor the Macan, REALLY!

  • @brunorocha9348
    @brunorocha9348 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Congratulations, this is one of the very few unbiased British car reviewers I've seen so far. Don't get me wrong, Britan makes brilliant cars but Brit car reviewers sometimes find a little bit too difficult to admit that a german car can be better than their untouchable Land/Range Rovers. Good review though.

  • @ravadadlani
    @ravadadlani 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    +espjuan I feel the macan is a significantly better vehicle than a 911 the
    turbo is more powerful than a base 911 and it's more practical
    by Ravesh Dadalani

  • @Earthwatcher57
    @Earthwatcher57 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nothing that JLR makes is equal to the Macan, and the Macan is off road enough for me, fine on rough country tracks. Spot on review.

  • @ravadadlani
    @ravadadlani 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    +espjuan I feel the macan is a significantly better vehicle than a 911 the turbo is more powerful than a base 911 and it's more practical

  • @jawadarif5676
    @jawadarif5676 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    You should also mention what are extra. I remember even auto light was extra

  • @Fal-t8w
    @Fal-t8w 9 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    PORSCHE all the way

    • @Taradash4L
      @Taradash4L 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      GTS LOVER Can U afford a new Porsche ?
      HAHAHA NO

    • @wilkgr
      @wilkgr 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      AgletDC Oh? *You* can't.

  • @JoeGP
    @JoeGP 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    re-upload or re-edit ?

  • @ymyone
    @ymyone 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    As some people say , it’s not a fair comparison. One is for girls and shopping and the other is a drivers car.

  • @cedric.g_292
    @cedric.g_292 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    stop at 2:17 there you can see a photoshooting

  • @carbiify
    @carbiify 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Macan looks like an Austin Allegro.

  • @ryanshen767
    @ryanshen767 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In China, you can buy two Evoque with the same money on one Macan S :)

  • @BenzinioB
    @BenzinioB 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I think I'll prefer the Macan over the Cayenne ...

    • @thedon008
      @thedon008 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Me too...I've said that before to some friends and they didn't agree, but I think it's just the price point that makes it better in their eyes...I think the Macan is better looking, more practical, and generally a nicer car.

    • @BenzinioB
      @BenzinioB 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      thedon008 I can't afford both so my preference isn't connected with the price :)
      It is better looking indeed and as you said "generally a nicer car"

  • @KPKaccountt
    @KPKaccountt 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now I'll just have to wait for the smaller Panamera lol

  • @CarlosAlberto-ls4xk
    @CarlosAlberto-ls4xk 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    where is it?

  • @Mmoukarii
    @Mmoukarii 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does anyone know the song @ 2:33 - 2:59? Thanks :)

  • @TheMiamiTiger69
    @TheMiamiTiger69 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    lolz @ the fake enthusiasm 5:30

  • @harpreetkanwar
    @harpreetkanwar 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    dying to find the song in the end !

  • @Patty-g9p
    @Patty-g9p 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wenn ich die Kommentare lese dann sehe ich das alle keine Ahnung haben.
    Erstens ist der Evoque kein Range Rover, noch nicht einmal ein Land Rover, es ist Mrs. Beckhams Fucking Style Car.
    Den Namen Range Rover für solch ein Auto herzugeben zeigt wie weit es mit der Marke gekommen ist, und alle die dieses Auto gut finden sind....! Ja Geschmack macht einfach einsam.
    Aber nochmal zum Technik zurück, für alle die noch nie einen Porsche gefahren sind und keine Ahnung haben, hier spielt Champions League gegen Kreisklasse. Kein Vergleich! Totale Thema-Verfehlung!

  • @ashurslivo8921
    @ashurslivo8921 10 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    i stopped care about what brits say about german cars

    • @seinsmeld13
      @seinsmeld13 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's I, Brits, and German.

  • @FIFAracer
    @FIFAracer 10 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Damn, you're so biased on british cars...

    • @TheStig.
      @TheStig. 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      you mean biased

    • @bighands69
      @bighands69 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The Evoque is an amazing light weight SUV. It is top of its class.

  • @jalenwheeler
    @jalenwheeler 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please just be a tv show already

  • @jalenwheeler
    @jalenwheeler 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    You guys could take over the British top gear on bbc

  • @jjmg2847
    @jjmg2847 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    10 years later and o still can’t afford the Macan 😂
    I am 23 sooo haha

  • @asfinland
    @asfinland 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I consider the Evoque as a stylish way to come out of the closet.

  • @majdzahalka7989
    @majdzahalka7989 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why did u take the Diesel !!!!?????

  • @oppanheimer
    @oppanheimer 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can't stand people who buy these four wheel drive cars and never do off road driving. What is the point of driving this car only on the road?

    • @andyowens5494
      @andyowens5494 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ned 4wd is not only for off roading; its application is in performance and safety too. I had a 4wd X type (defo not designed for offroad, and you would never fit tyres for that on one); sure footed in the wet, snow, and got me across more muddy parking fields than I intended (because it could, so I didn’t need to shy away). As for the “oversized” body of these small SUVs, easy access for older relatives (yeah, real world considerations),, better driving visibility, and with decent suspension not significantly worse than a lower sports car (on most normal driving roads). Dont bias your view from a narrow perspective; accept them for what they are, and if thats not for you, then fair enough (plenty of others buy them, for all the right reasons).

  • @AuthorDarrellCScottJr
    @AuthorDarrellCScottJr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Houston floods... I’ll take a Range Rover.

  • @dotcomGone
    @dotcomGone 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    5:00 I cannot believe that didn't roll

    • @peterpiper5064
      @peterpiper5064 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why? It's only about 30 degrees - A *bus* could handle that 😅

  • @Paulose54
    @Paulose54 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great suv Porsche but i'll get the
    Cayenne GTS

  • @JamesLee-yk6it
    @JamesLee-yk6it 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    EvoqUE vs ford explore

  • @safweneyahyaoui1397
    @safweneyahyaoui1397 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    thumbs up if u see carrick of MUNCHESTER UNITED (y)

  • @_7.8.6
    @_7.8.6 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another Chelsea Tractor.

  • @Bmwx5fan9
    @Bmwx5fan9 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Only 43k o.o

  • @brisk601
    @brisk601 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    The evoque is a baby range rover

  • @abhijadon9412
    @abhijadon9412 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anyone recommended in 2021

  • @Iliveinamonsterverse
    @Iliveinamonsterverse 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    A mazing

  • @TheCarxpert
    @TheCarxpert 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Macan is butt ugly!!! RR Evoque is a proper 4x4, legendary off road capability and good looking...

    • @KnightShadey
      @KnightShadey 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Evoque is NOT a proper 4x4 it's AWD, or even FWD on some.
      And as mentioned in the review, neither of these will really be doing much off-roading by their intended market, they'll be mall-crawlers ferrying wives and kids to and from school & the market.

    • @gianhet
      @gianhet 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lol "legendary off roading" stop kidding yourself, even if it is better than the Macan, it's still not that great in off road..
      Plus these type of cars are not aiming to do off road, but just to look like it can do a little bit of it..
      Buy a G class if you want to do off road, not an evoque or a macan..

  • @pycJIaH77
    @pycJIaH77 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    macan

  • @tommak6167
    @tommak6167 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Macan all the way

  • @muhammet5722
    @muhammet5722 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    RANGE ROVER GAME ÖVER!!! 💥

  • @lautaroromero7244
    @lautaroromero7244 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    A+ WQRK! HE}, CUB SIDE WHAT'S YOUR OPINION ABOUT

  • @izakmend3826
    @izakmend3826 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    I bought my lincoln mkc for 27g's better looking than both of these and still fun to drive

    • @ryanpham7192
      @ryanpham7192 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +izak mend better looking? you high or something bro?

    • @Drewbie85
      @Drewbie85 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +izak mend I'd get the Porsche macan s not the "turbo" and i disagree, i thought he Macan is better looking.

    • @hxvideo
      @hxvideo 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No, sorry mate, you wasted money on a trash called Lincoln, try again next time~

  • @harryc266
    @harryc266 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not really a review but yahoo

  • @johansoderlund9670
    @johansoderlund9670 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Macan is not a SUV. Not roomy, not practical, in no way is it an SUV. Just an excuse for mongs wanting a fast car and being able to say to their wifes thats its a practical suv.. lol

    • @lisawood3924
      @lisawood3924 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sport Utility Vehicle,....Let's see,....Sport? Major CHECK! Utility....Okay, does it have a hatch back? Can you fold down the seats? Can you utilize the cargo space with seats folded down, unlike in a car? CHECK! Nothing to say to the "wife," here... because I AM the wife and this is the vehicle I want and will get. My reasons are that I love high performance and the sports car feel, but need to occasionally have the capacity to haul things that don't go well in a back seat or trunk. PROBLEM SOLVED. Yes, I'd call it an SUV. It just puts more emphasis on the drive than the utility part, which is EXACTLY what I want. There's nothing that says massive cargo space is what it takes to make it function for utility.

  • @jeanmarie97
    @jeanmarie97 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    N

  • @mou3adh
    @mou3adh 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    i just want to vomit..what a shameful car, mainly when it's done by Porsche

    • @Ap0caLyPSe972
      @Ap0caLyPSe972 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah but they said that those cars (with the money they give to Porsche) help them to develop their sportscars...

    • @joaosoares3719
      @joaosoares3719 10 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Go watch something else then, you idiot...

    • @brucec43
      @brucec43 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Oh you Porsche snobs. It's a company, not a sports car club. Wah, that CUV is faster than my sports car. Wah, it handles great. Wah, it has more space and practicality. Wah, you can drive it in the snow.

    • @SunnySingh-bi3zo
      @SunnySingh-bi3zo 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      *****
      it doesn't look like a hatchback and this thing is faster than a Porsche boxster i have no problem with Porsche building a small premium suv and this will increase the sales of porsche so even better i dont think anybody should have any problem with the Macan if you do then don't watch Macan videos

    • @SunnySingh-bi3zo
      @SunnySingh-bi3zo 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      *****
      i dont get it do you like the macan or not

  • @MegaJasperdog
    @MegaJasperdog 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Evoque colour is yuck.

  • @winsto2230
    @winsto2230 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    In all actuality the Brits no longer own their own Badges..they are owned by India and their whole country has sold out. Good friends but terrible business partners! Drink more tea and discuss "The good old days" Germans actually did win.

    • @SunnySingh-bi3zo
      @SunnySingh-bi3zo 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      actually Land Rover has improved vastly since TATA as taken over the sales are up and even the reliability has been getting better

    • @SunnySingh-bi3zo
      @SunnySingh-bi3zo 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      *****
      he said there owned by India and there whole country has sold out and said there terrible business partners hes basically saying there not doing so good but hes just not saying it straight up and im commenting because i have nothing better to do how about you also commented so i think its safe to say your a loser and you have no life because that's way you assumed i am so i think you also have nothing better to do

    • @SunnySingh-bi3zo
      @SunnySingh-bi3zo 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      *****
      so tell me what does it mean when he said there owned by india and there whole country has sold out

  • @MRjesseNL
    @MRjesseNL 10 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Porsche diesel, what a shame

  • @alexchami9522
    @alexchami9522 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Porsche

  • @aliancemd
    @aliancemd 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    That Evoque is so damn ugly, OMG...

  • @freewayninja4065
    @freewayninja4065 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I'd buy the Macan........................................... to use as a garbage can

    • @turboman1505
      @turboman1505 10 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      I doubt you can even afford one :p

    • @supbrotv
      @supbrotv 10 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      turboman1505 i doubt he can even afford a garbage can.

    • @harryc266
      @harryc266 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      He's black so obviously..

    • @syedomarnorth2561
      @syedomarnorth2561 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Twat

    • @harryc266
      @harryc266 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Doubt it

  • @CynicalBastard511
    @CynicalBastard511 10 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    The Evoque is an embarrassment compared to the Macan.