Presumably, one would program the flight path to give it a final run, clear of any mountains. (over water). I would be interested to know if they would be able to clear flat terrain, or any kind of ships in the way. (probably not ships, but maybe a law ornament?)
RB-04 looks like the black Russian drone fighter that would sneak up on you back when Spectrum Holobyte had Falcon 3.0. The Godfather of flightsims. Good times.
JDAM flies on a pre-programmed way point driven flight path that is determined by terrain scanning radar before the warhead is fired. The onboard gyroscope keeps the missile oriented along the flight path and a photo scanning camera uses image recognition to compare the real time flight with satellite data. Minor corrections to the gyroscope orientation are performed using the combined data of ground scanning radar, programmed memory, and optical sensors. Then the missile flies the pre-programmed terrain following flight path so that difficult undulating maneuvers over hilly terrain are not automated by radar alone in un-powered flight.
You can control 802-AKG ON JF-17 THUNDER. with ur pod and steer it in pod evade mountains and terrain, i do it all the time. But yea DCS needs to improve. Its the best simulator. I hope it gets even better with time. Good content.
The RB04 is a purpose designed anti ship missile that traces it's origins back to crash landed V1 Buzz Bombs in Sweden. It's autopilot is a direct development of the one in the V1.
Interesting. So seems it would probably work (aside from the Viggen missiles) if you fired them over terrain which sloped downwards to the coast, they should be able to follow that to reach the water and then hit a ship. Knowing that could come in useful some day.
Odd. I think the missiles don't evade because, at the terminal phase, it'll assume it is over water. The Harpoon and the other missiles trying to avoid the terrain, I believe wasn't a TF/TA function, but the missiles altimeter reacting to the terrain, thinking it was larger waves and trying to avoid them. I know the modern RBS-15 has some special stuff going on so it can distinguish targets from small island, so terrain following for ASM's is definitely some sort of thing in the real world.
maybe the missiles were outside of their flight envelope. e.g. - fire them over easier terrain rather than into steep mountain sides, they are not advanced cruise missiles
Here's one to test: can you drop multiple laser guided GBU's (GBU-10, 12, etc) and strike multiple targets in 1 pass? What is the best method to do so? Delayed drops? Careful timing? Quickly moving the laser from target to target?
@@grimreapers Multiple lasers! There's an idea. Have a few planes with different laser codes, drop several bombs at once with different laser codes maybe? Hmm. Or maybe ripple the bombs (drop 1, wait 5 seconds, drop another, etc) and try to slew the laser over to a new target. This is what they pay you the big bucks for!
I once managed to bomb 2 targets with GBUs with the Mirage... had a JTAC (self-controlled) lasing a target, toss-lofted the first one with lots of speed from high altitude and while still pulling up I just released another one that then just went ballistic as well and picked up the laser just fine. As they were separated, I could easily just laser-spot a second target in the vicinity after the first impact.
I've been thinking if buying DCS and watching your excellent videos. I'll be buying DCS soon, A-10C. I live next to Davis Monthan AFB, Tucson, AZ and watch the A-10s all the time. Thanks for the videos, I've just subscribed! Cheers,.
The problem is with the type of radar the missles are using.It isn't a true TF/TA radar. Look up the history of the early development on the FB-111's radar.
I feel like you owe the AGM-84Ds a second attempt. Not that they'll probably perform any better but it seems really unfair that you took so long setting them up that they essentially were diving into the mountains instead of over the water like the others.
Could you do a toughness test of the SU-33? Btw my comment on the 180 video I didn't mean if the Su 33 could do the same I was watching the Su 25 toughness test and I commented without knowing the video was another one sorry
I heard the aim 9x has something called jet vane control can anybody explain that . Isnt tht jist like thrust vectoring .if thats the case wouldnt the aim 9x have a stronger g loading the regular sidewinders ? Or aim 120 c
Maliki Higgs it’s a method of thrust vectoring. Instead of moving an exhaust nozzle, they put fins inside the exhaust flow. That way the fins deflect the exhaust to help control the missile
I was under the impression from some darpa video i watched a while back that they channel the exhaust thru the fins of the missiles along with the capabilitys of the fins steering to create this jet vane control and boost the g loading . Thanks for the info tho i wasnt sure . So does anybody kno the max amount of gs the aim 9x can pull . ?
RBS15 have a “drop down” waypoint that your supposed to set were the water is.
Also a turning point waypoint to allow you to direct it around terrain.
Presumably, one would program the flight path to give it a final run, clear of any mountains. (over water).
I would be interested to know if they would be able to clear flat terrain, or any kind of ships in the way. (probably not ships, but maybe a law ornament?)
RB-04 looks like the black Russian drone fighter that would sneak up on you back when Spectrum Holobyte had Falcon 3.0. The Godfather of flightsims. Good times.
JDAM flies on a pre-programmed way point driven flight path that is determined by terrain scanning radar before the warhead is fired. The onboard gyroscope keeps the missile oriented along the flight path and a photo scanning camera uses image recognition to compare the real time flight with satellite data. Minor corrections to the gyroscope orientation are performed using the combined data of ground scanning radar, programmed memory, and optical sensors. Then the missile flies the pre-programmed terrain following flight path so that difficult undulating maneuvers over hilly terrain are not automated by radar alone in un-powered flight.
You can control 802-AKG ON JF-17 THUNDER. with ur pod and steer it in pod evade mountains and terrain, i do it all the time. But yea DCS needs to improve. Its the best simulator. I hope it gets even better with time. Good content.
YES but it's real heard.
@@grimreapers hard true
The RB04 is a purpose designed anti ship missile that traces it's origins back to crash landed V1 Buzz Bombs in Sweden.
It's autopilot is a direct development of the one in the V1.
cool
@@grimreapers it uses a british rocket engine
Nice shot Sanchez. You hit the mountain!
Interesting. So seems it would probably work (aside from the Viggen missiles) if you fired them over terrain which sloped downwards to the coast, they should be able to follow that to reach the water and then hit a ship. Knowing that could come in useful some day.
I henceforth officially rename the Jef to the Jiffy-Pop!
Odd.
I think the missiles don't evade because, at the terminal phase, it'll assume it is over water.
The Harpoon and the other missiles trying to avoid the terrain, I believe wasn't a TF/TA function, but the missiles altimeter reacting to the terrain, thinking it was larger waves and trying to avoid them.
I know the modern RBS-15 has some special stuff going on so it can distinguish targets from small island, so terrain following for ASM's is definitely some sort of thing in the real world.
maybe the missiles were outside of their flight envelope. e.g. - fire them over easier terrain rather than into steep mountain sides, they are not advanced cruise missiles
Perhaps they are designed to doge some amount of waves but have small difficulties with islands ? Anyway love your content
Here's one to test: can you drop multiple laser guided GBU's (GBU-10, 12, etc) and strike multiple targets in 1 pass? What is the best method to do so? Delayed drops? Careful timing? Quickly moving the laser from target to target?
WOW! thats a challengE! multiple lasers?
@@grimreapers Multiple lasers! There's an idea. Have a few planes with different laser codes, drop several bombs at once with different laser codes maybe? Hmm.
Or maybe ripple the bombs (drop 1, wait 5 seconds, drop another, etc) and try to slew the laser over to a new target.
This is what they pay you the big bucks for!
I once managed to bomb 2 targets with GBUs with the Mirage... had a JTAC (self-controlled) lasing a target, toss-lofted the first one with lots of speed from high altitude and while still pulling up I just released another one that then just went ballistic as well and picked up the laser just fine. As they were separated, I could easily just laser-spot a second target in the vicinity after the first impact.
I've been thinking if buying DCS and watching your excellent videos. I'll be buying DCS soon, A-10C. I live next to Davis Monthan AFB, Tucson, AZ and watch the A-10s all the time. Thanks for the videos, I've just subscribed! Cheers,.
Welcome!
Dcs is free bro. U purchase modules later on. U can check it out for free with 2 free aircraft.
@@FoxtrotDeltazulu Hi FD, yes I knew...and did download DCS and bought the A10C... let the training begin. Cheers.
@@cmdrcorvuscoraxnevermore3354 Cheers mate.
I would highly suggest to search up the more modern version of the RBS 15 (the mk3 and mk4)
Perfect - thanks cap!
Also if asm fly nap to earth at sea wht happens if you have 12 plus foot waves . Will it steer over or just crash and explode
*** How many Harriers and Helicopters can you place on the Tarawa? :) P.S. Can you land a fixed wing jet, other than harriers, on it?
1 way to find out
what no cry of "BONZAI!" @ 10:14
The problem is with the type of radar the missles are using.It isn't a true TF/TA radar. Look up the history of the early development on the FB-111's radar.
any chance any of those pop up over a non target ship, to then relocate the target?
Just FYI the ship-launched Harpoons are much better at avoiding terrain.
Awesome!
lol @ the end
The Reapers clearly need DCS: MXY-7 :)
Can they do "nap of the earth" on the way to terminal fase?
neg
I feel like you owe the AGM-84Ds a second attempt. Not that they'll probably perform any better but it seems really unfair that you took so long setting them up that they essentially were diving into the mountains instead of over the water like the others.
@4:30 TRYCK EJ HÄR = Don't Push Here
lol
Could you do a toughness test of the SU-33? Btw my comment on the 180 video I didn't mean if the Su 33 could do the same I was watching the Su 25 toughness test and I commented without knowing the video was another one sorry
rgr
have you ever tried shooting down a curses missile with an if air to air if not can you??
yes you can
@@grimreapers oh ok sweet
I heard the aim 9x has something called jet vane control can anybody explain that . Isnt tht jist like thrust vectoring .if thats the case wouldnt the aim 9x have a stronger g loading the regular sidewinders ? Or aim 120 c
Yes
Maliki Higgs it’s a method of thrust vectoring. Instead of moving an exhaust nozzle, they put fins inside the exhaust flow. That way the fins deflect the exhaust to help control the missile
So in other words its just like the f 22s tailpipes
I was under the impression from some darpa video i watched a while back that they channel the exhaust thru the fins of the missiles along with the capabilitys of the fins steering to create this jet vane control and boost the g loading . Thanks for the info tho i wasnt sure . So does anybody kno the max amount of gs the aim 9x can pull . ?
@@weld4200 Not really. More like the V2 rocket.
Finger nail and tongue clicking... heralds the ASMR missile in terminal phase
I think torpedoes can lol
What ? So the nickname for JF-17 is Jigglypuff ?!?!? ... hmm makes sense actually.
Jiffy Pop
Su -30 MKI has BhraMos missile integrated. The world's most fastest and most accurate cruise/anti ship missile
kamikaze
And by the end, thats the reasons why Japanese use Kamikaze pilots instead Sea Eagle ;)
Well this got demonetised....
yup
Try to get the F-16 out of controlled flight. I havent tried but its supposedly possible.
forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4207645&postcount=80
thx
Obvious case of shit programming.