Designing a Gain Controller, 3rd Order

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 21

  • @joramgichane
    @joramgichane 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very informative video. Bravo. My question is whether the same procedure would be followed if the system had one zero.

  • @jiiggsj
    @jiiggsj 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you very much. I was finding this method desperately. You helped me a lot

  • @harrisondsouza5532
    @harrisondsouza5532 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Loved it

  • @ohsnapigetit4631
    @ohsnapigetit4631 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Saved my sanity!

  • @DaviesEnoch-x3y
    @DaviesEnoch-x3y 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please what is the equation for rise time

  • @christianjmyhre
    @christianjmyhre 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you have a video on higher order systems? Im dealing with a 4th order system

  • @johnnysamaan4047
    @johnnysamaan4047 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    If we have a 4th order characteristic equation instead of 3rd order, what would be the damping equation that we have to write??

    • @theryderproject5053
      @theryderproject5053  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I guess you could make a 4th order that also assumes the second order part was dominant. That would involve just adding an extra (s+p) onto the existing 3rd order equation. However you'd need to validate the assumption still.

  • @ayberkumut
    @ayberkumut 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks a lot

  • @amnasohail8228
    @amnasohail8228 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is this method called?

  • @pallavemanarayana1476
    @pallavemanarayana1476 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have Doubt that in 13>5 the second order assumption validation, why specifically 5

    • @theryderproject5053
      @theryderproject5053  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's just the "rule of thumb". It isn't an exact science, but that's where the line has been drawn in the sand for making a decision about validity.

    • @pallavemanarayana1476
      @pallavemanarayana1476 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@theryderproject5053 thank you very much

  • @siddheshsharma22945
    @siddheshsharma22945 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    But ts = 4 / zeta * wn is the settling time for an under damped System for 2% error band . How did you assume that the second order system (which is dominant) is an under damped system ?

    • @theryderproject5053
      @theryderproject5053  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are told in the question to assume that the second order component is dominant. When designing second order systems, underdamped is generally the best type because it is able to achieve a quicker settling time than a critically damped or overdamped system (and you can usually tolerate the small amount of overshoot). The validity of the assumption is assessed at the end of the video.

    • @siddheshsharma22945
      @siddheshsharma22945 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@theryderproject5053 Ok Thanks ! In India we need to give an entrance exam for pursuing Post Graduation from top Engineering Institutes like IITs and NITs . In the exam we usually find questions from Second Order Systems . Every year the syllabus is amended and minor changes are made . For 2021 exam , we have Third order Systems in our syllabus for Control Systems as well . This video came handy . Great video !

    • @theryderproject5053
      @theryderproject5053  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@siddheshsharma22945 Good luck!

  • @rajeev.singh.
    @rajeev.singh. 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    india🔥🔥🔥