Your whole playlist is absolutely flawless. Control systems is literally one of the hardest topics in Electrical and Computer Engineering and you taught me in a few videos what my professor couldn't in an entire semester. Thank you so much!
Thank you so much! I've been struggling with this topic for a long time, and you made it so easy to understand!! Send you good vibes and good energy :)
Excellent, very helpful. Just one small detail I notice and I wanted to confirm, at 14:37 it appears to be a mistake since 145*145=21025 . Thanks for the great tutorials btw.
being enrolled in course of control systems, I loved this series. I want to seek your permission to translate this knowledge in my language only if you permit. :)
You are hands down the best lecturer on Feedback Control Systems. I loved your videos. but a little complaint though, you made a video on Lead Lag Controller but didn't make a video on Lag or Lead compensator
@@theryderproject5053 sorry, I'll rephrase. You made a video on lead lag controller but didn't make a separate video on just a Lead or a Lag compensator. Thank you
Great video thanks! The mic your using seems to be really hard on speakers though...If you can or want to, I'd recommend using an equalizer plug-in and turning down the mid frequencies quite a bit until it goes away. It gets hard to listen to otherwise, although its good information so it basically becomes torcher... A different mic thats softer on the mid frequencies would help too but a simple plug-in or even auto-tune would be the best for a quick and easy fix.
What if the plant was a third-order system, instead of the given second-order system 5/[s(s + 20)] ? Could the overall approach for finding damping ratio and natural frequency be the same?
This helped a lot, I'm looking for an example where the plan has a function similar to: 1/(s*(s+1)(s^2+10s+26)). I think that is called additional zeros, but I can't figure out what I should do to find the natural frequency and stuff since it is not in the standard 2nd order form.
Hi. I think you are referring to the second closed loop pole that is sitting in the lower right quadrant at (-100, -105). If so, it should not be considered in the root locus calculations for angle as I have done it - you just pick one closed loop pole to consider and in this case I picked the one in the upper right quadrant at (-100, 105). You should get the same answer if you choose the other one though.
@@sheepman6291 Sorry I don't think I have the Matlab codes anymore from when I made this. However, if you refer to the drawing root locus section of the playlist, I show Matlab codes for generating root locus diagrams. If you look at the designing a gain controller section of the playlist, I show Matlab codes for simulating the time response.
I think it is the same formula but taking advantage of the fact that angles repeat on the plane (if you add 360 degrees to an angle, it's still the same angle). I think in your formula n would just be an integer so you'd pick whatever was most convenient (if you put in n=0 then it would be my formula).
@@ud4458 I think n is an integer - this means a whole number (eg. -2,-1,0,1,2...). You could pick any integer and you'd get the same angle on the plane (since these repeat every 360 degrees).
Sorry I don't think I have the Matlab codes anymore from when I made this. However, if you refer to the drawing root locus section of the playlist, I show Matlab codes for generating root locus diagrams. If you look at the designing a gain controller section of the playlist, I show Matlab codes for simulating the time response.
![ILLSLICK - KILLSHOT REMIX [FULL VERSION]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RIK8RrqIAzE/mqdefault.jpg)
Your whole playlist is absolutely flawless. Control systems is literally one of the hardest topics in Electrical and Computer Engineering and you taught me in a few videos what my professor couldn't in an entire semester. Thank you so much!
One of the best Control system lectures I have ever listened to. Thanks a lot
I hardly ever leave comments but this was super helpful. Thank you so much
Hands down the best lecture I've received in my effort to learn control systems, thank you so much you're wonderful!
This is the best video available on youtube for design. THANKS A LOT
you are goat. you saved my one year just by one example. thanks a lot
This playlist was extremely helpful, learned the whole 421 unit so quickly! Thank you!
its literally a 3 in 1, thank you so so much, I couldn't have done it without this video😭
You saved me. The textbook and class notes had me lost. Thank you so much!
This was the best lecture ever. I really liked the way you taught the concept. Thank you so much
If only the professor was this effortless at teaching.
This was the best lecture ever. Thank you so much for making things very simple and easy to understand.
You are brilliant! Thank you.
great playlist, thanks for all the lectures! might actually pass thanks to you
Thank you so much! I've been struggling with this topic for a long time, and you made it so easy to understand!! Send you good vibes and good energy :)
continue to good work
best wishes for you .
Your videos are tremendously informative and clear, i will appreciate making video on LQR and roboust control
Excellent, very helpful. Just one small detail I notice and I wanted to confirm, at 14:37 it appears to be a mistake since 145*145=21025
. Thanks for the great tutorials btw.
Hi. I think I probably used more decimal places in the calculation which is why there is a slight difference - it's just a small rounding error.
it was too much helpful ... Thank you so much for making such videos :)
i love design lead lag controller very useful
This clarifies a lot. Thanks so much!
a great video, thank you so much, helped me for my exam! glad i found your channel
I love your accent. Please make more control system videos.
This was very helpful, thank you
Thank you so much mam you elaborated each step so well
being enrolled in course of control systems, I loved this series. I want to seek your permission to translate this knowledge in my language only if you permit. :)
Very clear and structured!
awesome explanation
Thank you very much !
I understood the subject very clearly.
Alright all i can say is THANK YOUUUU
Thank you very much for this maam. Very helpful!
i like the way you explain
You are hands down the best lecturer on Feedback Control Systems. I loved your videos. but a little complaint though, you made a video on Lead Lag Controller but didn't make a video on Lag or Lead compensator
Thanks for the nice feedback. In this context, controllers and compensators are the same thing (I use the terms interchangeably).
@@theryderproject5053 sorry, I'll rephrase. You made a video on lead lag controller but didn't make a separate video on just a Lead or a Lag compensator. Thank you
Excellent
How did I know which pole to cancel? Why we choose -20 instead of 0 Here. Thank you!
Great video thanks! The mic your using seems to be really hard on speakers though...If you can or want to, I'd recommend using an equalizer plug-in and turning down the mid frequencies quite a bit until it goes away. It gets hard to listen to otherwise, although its good information so it basically becomes torcher... A different mic thats softer on the mid frequencies would help too but a simple plug-in or even auto-tune would be the best for a quick and easy fix.
sounds like a controls problem haha
What if the plant was a third-order system, instead of the given second-order system 5/[s(s + 20)] ?
Could the overall approach for finding damping ratio and natural frequency be the same?
you are the best, thank you so much.
This helped a lot, I'm looking for an example where the plan has a function similar to: 1/(s*(s+1)(s^2+10s+26)). I think that is called additional zeros, but I can't figure out what I should do to find the natural frequency and stuff since it is not in the standard 2nd order form.
How about there is another pole included, say (s+2) should I cancel both existing poles to have two lead zeros?
AMAZING MAM ! so Helpful
amazing
How do I know if I have to calculate a lead or a lag compensation if not specified ?
My question is if the system have imaginary poles then how we will cancel it
😊 cute laugh at 22:15
This is the best thanks
Wow, U got it!! Thx.
Hi, is this method work for 4th order transfer function? how do you cancle the zeros if they are exist
Can you share the Matlab code of particular example???
Wonderful!! :)
For the lead controller shouldn't ZLead > Plead? Or does that not matter when we are designing a lead lag controller?
how is ln^2 possible? I keep getting errors on my calculator
what if the feedback is not 1? do we need to concider poles and zeros of the feedback?
Yes if the feedback transfer function differs then it will impact the solution.
Thank you
u should've consider 90 angle of second pole (red one).
Hi. I think you are referring to the second closed loop pole that is sitting in the lower right quadrant at (-100, -105). If so, it should not be considered in the root locus calculations for angle as I have done it - you just pick one closed loop pole to consider and in this case I picked the one in the upper right quadrant at (-100, 105). You should get the same answer if you choose the other one though.
you are perfect !
thanks for this!!!
Do you have bode plots videos
Good
hi, I am confused on how do we decide the pole location, does the pole always lag in lead compensator?
plz help
by design, the pole leads the zero.
thank you for the great effort
Yes Matlab code please! Thank you!
@@sheepman6291 Sorry I don't think I have the Matlab codes anymore from when I made this. However, if you refer to the drawing root locus section of the playlist, I show Matlab codes for generating root locus diagrams. If you look at the designing a gain controller section of the playlist, I show Matlab codes for simulating the time response.
@@theryderproject5053
Hi
Please can you do a fever for me, I need to know how can I change the information of pid controller into reality
Thanks
P-lead = 205 , how it can be 200?
wow thank you so much!
Thanks you! ☺️
ASMR lectures :D
you should use a clearer pointer it is not clear how you found theta 1 e.g.180-what?
Thankss
Some texts write 7:52 as ΣOz-ΣOp =180+360(n-1) can you help me understand what this means ?
I think it is the same formula but taking advantage of the fact that angles repeat on the plane (if you add 360 degrees to an angle, it's still the same angle). I think in your formula n would just be an integer so you'd pick whatever was most convenient (if you put in n=0 then it would be my formula).
@@theryderproject5053 Thank you! what does n represent, meaning how do you know to put zero.
@@ud4458 I think n is an integer - this means a whole number (eg. -2,-1,0,1,2...). You could pick any integer and you'd get the same angle on the plane (since these repeat every 360 degrees).
@@theryderproject5053 thank you!
Nice tutorial but please fix the handwriting if you don’t mind. I was struggling to understand what you wrote
Can you plz provide MATLAB code i am confuse in coding
Sorry I don't think I have the Matlab codes anymore from when I made this. However, if you refer to the drawing root locus section of the playlist, I show Matlab codes for generating root locus diagrams. If you look at the designing a gain controller section of the playlist, I show Matlab codes for simulating the time response.
What is wrong with your voice? Btw the explanation was good
time stano 22:14 😄😄😄😄😄😄😄
Thanks abla
Sorry it's 22:14