Cinema Sins doesn’t know the difference between a deus ex machina (a solution to a problem without an explanation of how or why it happened) and Chekhov’s gun (the idea that if there’s something that is not going to be used in a film later on, then it shouldn’t be included in the film in the first place).
@@iantaggart3064 I’m actually also extremely critical of Lightyear. It’s just that one part of it that I defend because the show established that Zurg was lying
8:03 One thing I’ll say in relation to that is that there was one movie that I did in 2021 and there were at least six instances of Jeremy asking “what if” questions and I said “that didn’t happen though” for almost all of those. And I say almost because for one of them, it did feel like a valid “what if” question, so I skipped it.
Jeremy said "Woody falling on the table triggered his voice prompt"! First, Voice *_BOX!!_* Second, after Buster made a particular jump, Woody fell off. Then a little girl picked him up asking her mom to buy him. *_The mom pulled his pullstring, triggering his voice box!_* *_WHY does this Pedophile have ANYTHING but his soiled underwear around his waist!?!?!?!_*
I'd like to call out another thing, at 6:18 we learn that Jessie and Pete were packed in storage before Al found Woody, therefore they would have no way of knowing Al's schedule.
I tried it once, though I'm still in very early stages. Actually quite easy as CinemaSins' team (mainly Jeremy) is so dimwitted with their sins, they basically write the script for us 😅 Not the quality of Th3Birdman or Tyler himself, but I'm proud of it. Not trying to self-promote btw 😆
@Luke Dougherty They really make it easy, don't they? Jeremy basically writes the whole scripts for us 🤣 I really gotta make more videos, it's definitely a ton of fun!
@@S-Mania Yeah, I think you should, and I’d also like to say that for me, when it comes to writing sins for a video, I usually can just think of something to say right off the bat.
@@S-Mania Also also, something that I’ve noticed when it comes to movies that me and Th3Birdman have both done videos on is that he covers sins that I don’t cover and I cover sins that he doesn’t cover.
14:12 I never thought that the girl noticed Slinky coming to life. I just presumed that Slinky's barking made it seem to her that whatever dog in the carrier had the potential of being dangerous and bite her.
Missed SinSins 2:18 Andy later says that he didn't take Woody to camp because he was worried his whole arm would come off. 3:37 Characters having disturbing dreams is part of their character arc, as they reflect problems the character need to overcome. 4:02 The REAL Sin here is that he didn't just jump off the shelf, as he is a squeak toy and should have been fine. Even Woody jumps off. 11:27 That's a lie. Mr. Potatohead was never blind when they knocked out his eyes.
11:38 To add to your point, I think the reason Potato Head's vision was obscured during the moving truck scene in the first movie is because his eyes went flying erratically like the rest of his face, rather than being manually operated.
It’s not really pickiness on Andy’s part: a small tear in a plush toy can easily become a large tear if you take it into a very active environment like summer camp.
0:44 *Spoilers ahead! You've been warned.* 1:35 Imagine sinning world building. 5:32 CinemaWins is a superior channel, and that only has 2.4 million subscribers. But I got a feel that number will go up in the future. 16:20 Just watch Buzz Lightyear of Star Command instead.
This is an awesome pastiche to Birdman's pastiche of CinemaSins. Honestly, I wish Birdman made a real Toy Story 2 vid, but this should be good for now. You did a real good job on this video, by the way. There are a few things that you could improve on like the mic quality, the black borders, the ding noise and the timer, but this is awesome so far! Keep up the good work!
14:44 Actually, toys quite possibly do have lungs, in Toy Story 3, when the toys are in the trash bag at the beginning of the movie, Jessie says she cannot breathe, this implies that the toys possibly do have lungs.
I think they only need their lungs when in horrible situations to get out of it quicker, I don't think the toys really have a respiratory system, and if they did, they'd be dead. Just corpses. I think they have a system which gives them extra energy when they breathe, and if they run out of energy (which is used to keep the toys story running, and isn't used while in rest mode)
*O-M-EFFING-G!!!* Jeremy blathers so much about the humans being traumatized forever after seeing the toys alive that I suspect he *Actually advocates for* a movie where that happens!!! Except, *THAT ALREADY HAPPENED TO SID IN TOY STORY 1!!!!!*
1:40 ALSO On the Xbox 360, they released a game called “Toy Story 3” and that whole game sequence was a level in the game. SO, it’s a real game. Cinema Sins rightfully gets a sin for not doing their research.
1. The Incredibles 2. Toy Story 2 3. Toy Story 3 4. Monsters, Inc. 5. Inside Out 6. Coco 7. Ratatouille 8. Toy Story 9. Toy Story 4 10. Onward For me, all of these are at least 8/10. I've even been thinking about making a tier list of talking about all of them, since Pixar is the main studio that I grew up with, and it saddens me knowing that they aren't as successful now, since both Lightyear (is something I could rant forever on how much I dislike it) and Elemental (still haven't seen it) bombed, and Elio's teaser didn't impress me.
@@captainvader921 That’s a nice list, and my top 10 is: 1. Up (10/10) 2. Toy Story 3 (10/10) 3. The Incredibles (10/10) 4. Coco (10/10) 5. Inside Out (10/10) 6. Soul (10/10) 7. Finding Nemo (10/10) 8. Toy Story 2 (10/10) 9. Toy Story (10/10) 10. Turning Red (9/10) And while I definitely do feel the same way about Pixar not being as successful now, I do still think that the quality of their films released this decade is still very good, and I personally really enjoyed Elemental and I also did like Lightyear, but I respect your opinion.
So what i got here: There are 2 different sins channels that i know of. Animation sins and cinema sins. One is made by the family friendly people who animate only in Minecraft format and may or may not have had major drama, and the other is made by a guy who doesn't know what a cinema "sin" really is.
Bro magically added 200 sins 12:51 so this movie only has 53 sins. This is a good video I also question why cinema sins sins great movies for Radom reasons
If you like it, that's fine. I just thought it didn't make sense in the Toy Story universe. Kind of similar to how some people feel about the fourth movie in fact. But I'm not going to argue.
I respect what you tried to do here but it’s clear youre so personally invested in this movie it’s just kinda cringe how mad you get about his dumb jokes….
I'm not sure if anyone else commented on this, but in 13:19, the Pizza Planet truck IS a Deus Ex Machina because it DID come out of nowhere, since it was nowhere to be seen in any of the previous scenes.
I mean, they're in the middle of a town, literally any car could be there, and I can buy the truck being there, since the guy who was driving it was probably delivering pizza. I wouldn't really say it "came out of nowhere".
Cinemasin is supposed to be satire and just jokes about something that no one would ever really notice or even care about. It’s not suppose to be taken literally. Always watch it with a grain of salt.
@@captainvader921 that is why I say to always take it with a grain of salt. The "manipulation of scene to fit their narrative" is more of them pointing out something you never noticed and then putting their opinion in it. And since that is a new concept and a new thing you just saw and never thought about, you don't have a answer set for the newfound piece, so you go along with their reasoning. They aren't saying the movie is bad, pointing out legit problems doesn't mean the movie is bad. If you really love a movie, what does it matter what the small problems are? If the execution is correct and you love it, that is all that matters. Cinemasins used to work in cinema and are experts within the film industry and something similar. They take that knowledge to make satire videos. I also do understand that someone shit talking about your favorite movie is definitely not what you want but, if it isnt then don't watch it. Most people watching their video don't even look or think twice about it as they know it is satire. If you take satire seriously, you are just giving yourself a headache and unnecessary anger problems.
@@hyunlixworld6078 Listen, I've gotten over the "stop pointing out mistakes in my favorite movie" feeling a long time ago. I understand that no movie is perfect, even Terminator 2, my favorite movie ever, has a couple weird things about it that bother me. The problem is when TH-cam, which is a problem that not just CinemaSins has, demonstrates that they don't pay attention to a movie, or even if they do, they lie to create a false narrative. I do point out some things in this video that show that they actually do make false nitpicks, and I cannot call that satire. Satire is supposed to be hilarious, so when they misrepresent a movie to tell a joke, it's infuriating. And they still point out problems. Some of them are correct, but others, again, show that they either don't pay attention to a movie, or they just want to create problems for the sake of padding the sin count. For example, that one scene in Toy Story 2 when Al is coming to take pictures of the toys, and the toys need to get back in their place, CinemaSins mentions that they should turn off the TV. The problem with this is that they already turned off the TV before that scene. Or when they misuse Deus Ex Machina in a way that doesn't work at all. Or, as a recent example in my Lego Movie video, they question how Emmet is able to ride a Lego bicycle, and I showed a picture of a real Lego minifigure on a bicycle, proving that their nitpick is inherently flawed, because they don't do much research. And there's also the fact that in the EWW CinemaSins Volume 2 video, they even admit that they put real critiques next to jokes, and both add a sin to a movie, and they don't do a good job distinguishing the two. Honestly, you should watch Jay Exci's video on this topic. He does a really good job explaining why the "CinemaSins is satire" argument is flawed. My goal for these videos is to follow along with what Th3Birdman is doing, in that I want to point out the false problems that they bring up, and also point out that they're not even that funny. I am not butthurt they "ruined" a good movie, I am just saying if you're going to critique a movie, at least do it right. Or if you're trying to be satirical, don't lie about something to do it. As much as they say that they're satire, they're clearly trying to do both. th-cam.com/video/apJnWkCuqkc/w-d-xo.html&pp=ygUaamF5IGV4Y2kgY2luZW1hc2lucyBzYXRpcmU%3D
3:49, I actually am willing to defend CinemaSins here given that (to my recollection) at no other point in any of the four movies do Toys sleep (I know they revert to inanimate when a human shows up but that’s not what’s happening here) and as such it’s legitimate to question why Woody has any need for sleep (he’s not a biological organism) and it’s pretty clearly exclusively to enable this dream sequence. (Yes, I know that’s a nitpick.)
Jeremy: "Pop culture references are sins"
Also Jeremy: Makes a pop culture reference in the video
Not only that, he removes a sin for the Rex parodying Jurassic Park scene
Cinema Sins doesn’t know the difference between a deus ex machina (a solution to a problem without an explanation of how or why it happened) and Chekhov’s gun (the idea that if there’s something that is not going to be used in a film later on, then it shouldn’t be included in the film in the first place).
I’m sure they don’t care because their content is meant to be funny not too serious. Time to put the haterade down
@Reyeyawn, their purpose is to be comedy with legitimate film criticism spliced in. The latter part means that it is legitimate critique of CinemaSins
It’s almost like CinemaSins is NOT Satire, huh?
@@talonthehedgehog3274 It’s not satire. It is (primarily) a comedy channel but it has genuine film criticism spliced in
@@Reyeyawn their intention to be funny doesn't give them a free card to continuously lie, spread misinformation and mislabel things
12:45, in the actual show, Zurg follows up with “Psyche. Made you look. You dimwit”implying that he’s not actually Buzz’s father.
Take that, Lightyear haters!
@@iantaggart3064 I’m actually also extremely critical of Lightyear. It’s just that one part of it that I defend because the show established that Zurg was lying
@@matityaloran9157 I liked a lot of things about the movie, but I agree it could have been better.
4:35
I can tell you from experience that if parents don’t see you playing with certain toys, they will sell them.
8:08, and based on the previous film, the answer is no. If there were Woody would have been put on trial for coming to life in front of Sid
Thanks for the hefty nostalgia boost in the first 40 seconds there
8:03 One thing I’ll say in relation to that is that there was one movie that I did in 2021 and there were at least six instances of Jeremy asking “what if” questions and I said “that didn’t happen though” for almost all of those.
And I say almost because for one of them, it did feel like a valid “what if” question, so I skipped it.
Sining bloopers should be a sin for cinema sins especially because bloopers are the best part of movies.
here here
Jeremy said "Woody falling on the table triggered his voice prompt"!
First, Voice *_BOX!!_*
Second, after Buster made a particular jump, Woody fell off. Then a little girl picked him up asking her mom to buy him. *_The mom pulled his pullstring, triggering his voice box!_*
*_WHY does this Pedophile have ANYTHING but his soiled underwear around his waist!?!?!?!_*
I'd like to call out another thing, at 6:18 we learn that Jessie and Pete were packed in storage before Al found Woody, therefore they would have no way of knowing Al's schedule.
Here’s to hoping your videos take off and grow, always nice to see channels making fun of cinemasins. 🤘🏻
I tried it once, though I'm still in very early stages. Actually quite easy as CinemaSins' team (mainly Jeremy) is so dimwitted with their sins, they basically write the script for us 😅
Not the quality of Th3Birdman or Tyler himself, but I'm proud of it. Not trying to self-promote btw 😆
I also sin them as well, and it’s a pretty fun thing to do.
@Luke Dougherty They really make it easy, don't they? Jeremy basically writes the whole scripts for us 🤣
I really gotta make more videos, it's definitely a ton of fun!
@@S-Mania Yeah, I think you should, and I’d also like to say that for me, when it comes to writing sins for a video, I usually can just think of something to say right off the bat.
@@S-Mania Also also, something that I’ve noticed when it comes to movies that me and Th3Birdman have both done videos on is that he covers sins that I don’t cover and I cover sins that he doesn’t cover.
@Captain Vader, great video
Great video! I also sin CinemaSins and I’ll also be doing Toy Story 2 someday.
14:12 I never thought that the girl noticed Slinky coming to life. I just presumed that Slinky's barking made it seem to her that whatever dog in the carrier had the potential of being dangerous and bite her.
I honestly thought everyone knew that. Then I remembered Jeremy and CinemaSins. Common Sense goes out the window with their team... 😑
Dude you made a mistake in the sin total. the total was 253 not 152
Dangnabit!
Missed SinSins
2:18 Andy later says that he didn't take Woody to camp because he was worried his whole arm would come off.
3:37 Characters having disturbing dreams is part of their character arc, as they reflect problems the character need to overcome.
4:02 The REAL Sin here is that he didn't just jump off the shelf, as he is a squeak toy and should have been fine. Even Woody jumps off.
11:27 That's a lie. Mr. Potatohead was never blind when they knocked out his eyes.
11:38 To add to your point, I think the reason Potato Head's vision was obscured during the moving truck scene in the first movie is because his eyes went flying erratically like the rest of his face, rather than being manually operated.
Please do another one of these
It’s not really pickiness on Andy’s part: a small tear in a plush toy can easily become a large tear if you take it into a very active environment like summer camp.
New sub here!
0:44 *Spoilers ahead! You've been warned.*
1:35 Imagine sinning world building.
5:32 CinemaWins is a superior channel, and that only has 2.4 million subscribers. But I got a feel that number will go up in the future.
16:20 Just watch Buzz Lightyear of Star Command instead.
This is an awesome pastiche to Birdman's pastiche of CinemaSins. Honestly, I wish Birdman made a real Toy Story 2 vid, but this should be good for now. You did a real good job on this video, by the way. There are a few things that you could improve on like the mic quality, the black borders, the ding noise and the timer, but this is awesome so far! Keep up the good work!
This video was about a year ago, and I think I've gotten better at those things.
@@captainvader921 That's good to hear. Hopefully, you'll make more of these soon, because I honestly really love them.
Like your videos.
12:24 Also also, I think you cut yourself off there.
oh my im subing
14:44 Actually, toys quite possibly do have lungs, in Toy Story 3, when the toys are in the trash bag at the beginning of the movie, Jessie says she cannot breathe, this implies that the toys possibly do have lungs.
No joke, after publishing the video, I immediately thought about that.
I was interested if you could CinemaSins' video on Disney Planes.
Its probably just magic and not actual lungs because I feel like people would notice there dolls have a fully functional respiratory system
@@paulsander5579 That's another good point.
I think they only need their lungs when in horrible situations to get out of it quicker, I don't think the toys really have a respiratory system, and if they did, they'd be dead. Just corpses.
I think they have a system which gives them extra energy when they breathe, and if they run out of energy (which is used to keep the toys story running, and isn't used while in rest mode)
*O-M-EFFING-G!!!* Jeremy blathers so much about the humans being traumatized forever after seeing the toys alive that I suspect he *Actually advocates for* a movie where that happens!!! Except, *THAT ALREADY HAPPENED TO SID IN TOY STORY 1!!!!!*
1:40 ALSO
On the Xbox 360, they released a game called “Toy Story 3” and that whole game sequence was a level in the game. SO, it’s a real game.
Cinema Sins rightfully gets a sin for not doing their research.
Since you mentioned in your description that this is one of your favorite Pixar movies, what are your top 10 Pixar movies?
1. The Incredibles
2. Toy Story 2
3. Toy Story 3
4. Monsters, Inc.
5. Inside Out
6. Coco
7. Ratatouille
8. Toy Story
9. Toy Story 4
10. Onward
For me, all of these are at least 8/10. I've even been thinking about making a tier list of talking about all of them, since Pixar is the main studio that I grew up with, and it saddens me knowing that they aren't as successful now, since both Lightyear (is something I could rant forever on how much I dislike it) and Elemental (still haven't seen it) bombed, and Elio's teaser didn't impress me.
@@captainvader921 That’s a nice list, and my top 10 is:
1. Up (10/10)
2. Toy Story 3 (10/10)
3. The Incredibles (10/10)
4. Coco (10/10)
5. Inside Out (10/10)
6. Soul (10/10)
7. Finding Nemo (10/10)
8. Toy Story 2 (10/10)
9. Toy Story (10/10)
10. Turning Red (9/10)
And while I definitely do feel the same way about Pixar not being as successful now, I do still think that the quality of their films released this decade is still very good, and I personally really enjoyed Elemental and I also did like Lightyear, but I respect your opinion.
@@captainvader921Also, here’s my Toy Story 2 video: m.th-cam.com/video/AZEKKb8eZrg/w-d-xo.html
Bonus sin at 1:50
„That’s racist”
So what i got here:
There are 2 different sins channels that i know of.
Animation sins and cinema sins.
One is made by the family friendly people who animate only in Minecraft format and may or may not have had major drama, and the other is made by a guy who doesn't know what a cinema "sin" really is.
Hey Tyler, what mic do you use?
Giving CinemaSins a taster of there own medications ahahahahahaha
But there are movies that DESERVE to be sinned, you know…
@@cdangelo1843 ye but not this one
*Taster*
@@could_possiblybe_thane07echo yes
9:36 I guess a sin for this video is forgetting to put the number down on screen
Oh, that was intentional. CS made a joke I liked, but I didn't think it was good enough to remove a sin, so I just left the sin count the same.
5:30 the funny part it a sin that he sin a coincidence without coincidence no plot would start in any movie so he can’t really sin coincidence
Bro magically added 200 sins 12:51 so this movie only has 53 sins. This is a good video I also question why cinema sins sins great movies for Radom reasons
3:01 He just wanted to point out the Super Nintendo.
Lightyear is a great film.
What's not to love?
If you like it, that's fine. I just thought it didn't make sense in the Toy Story universe. Kind of similar to how some people feel about the fourth movie in fact. But I'm not going to argue.
bird man isn’t very consistent
Toy Story 2 is Awesome
I respect what you tried to do here but it’s clear youre so personally invested in this movie it’s just kinda cringe how mad you get about his dumb jokes….
I'm not sure if anyone else commented on this, but in 13:19, the Pizza Planet truck IS a Deus Ex Machina because it DID come out of nowhere, since it was nowhere to be seen in any of the previous scenes.
I mean, they're in the middle of a town, literally any car could be there, and I can buy the truck being there, since the guy who was driving it was probably delivering pizza. I wouldn't really say it "came out of nowhere".
Cinemasin is supposed to be satire and just jokes about something that no one would ever really notice or even care about. It’s not suppose to be taken literally. Always watch it with a grain of salt.
Is that why they occasionally point out legit problems, while at the same time, manipulate scenes to better suit a false narrative?
@@captainvader921 that is why I say to always take it with a grain of salt. The "manipulation of scene to fit their narrative" is more of them pointing out something you never noticed and then putting their opinion in it. And since that is a new concept and a new thing you just saw and never thought about, you don't have a answer set for the newfound piece, so you go along with their reasoning.
They aren't saying the movie is bad, pointing out legit problems doesn't mean the movie is bad. If you really love a movie, what does it matter what the small problems are? If the execution is correct and you love it, that is all that matters.
Cinemasins used to work in cinema and are experts within the film industry and something similar. They take that knowledge to make satire videos. I also do understand that someone shit talking about your favorite movie is definitely not what you want but, if it isnt then don't watch it.
Most people watching their video don't even look or think twice about it as they know it is satire. If you take satire seriously, you are just giving yourself a headache and unnecessary anger problems.
@@hyunlixworld6078 Listen, I've gotten over the "stop pointing out mistakes in my favorite movie" feeling a long time ago. I understand that no movie is perfect, even Terminator 2, my favorite movie ever, has a couple weird things about it that bother me. The problem is when TH-cam, which is a problem that not just CinemaSins has, demonstrates that they don't pay attention to a movie, or even if they do, they lie to create a false narrative. I do point out some things in this video that show that they actually do make false nitpicks, and I cannot call that satire. Satire is supposed to be hilarious, so when they misrepresent a movie to tell a joke, it's infuriating.
And they still point out problems. Some of them are correct, but others, again, show that they either don't pay attention to a movie, or they just want to create problems for the sake of padding the sin count. For example, that one scene in Toy Story 2 when Al is coming to take pictures of the toys, and the toys need to get back in their place, CinemaSins mentions that they should turn off the TV. The problem with this is that they already turned off the TV before that scene. Or when they misuse Deus Ex Machina in a way that doesn't work at all. Or, as a recent example in my Lego Movie video, they question how Emmet is able to ride a Lego bicycle, and I showed a picture of a real Lego minifigure on a bicycle, proving that their nitpick is inherently flawed, because they don't do much research.
And there's also the fact that in the EWW CinemaSins Volume 2 video, they even admit that they put real critiques next to jokes, and both add a sin to a movie, and they don't do a good job distinguishing the two.
Honestly, you should watch Jay Exci's video on this topic. He does a really good job explaining why the "CinemaSins is satire" argument is flawed. My goal for these videos is to follow along with what Th3Birdman is doing, in that I want to point out the false problems that they bring up, and also point out that they're not even that funny. I am not butthurt they "ruined" a good movie, I am just saying if you're going to critique a movie, at least do it right. Or if you're trying to be satirical, don't lie about something to do it. As much as they say that they're satire, they're clearly trying to do both.
th-cam.com/video/apJnWkCuqkc/w-d-xo.html&pp=ygUaamF5IGV4Y2kgY2luZW1hc2lucyBzYXRpcmU%3D
Toy Story 2 is overrated lol. It’s great, and I like it a lot. It just gets WAY too much credit.
3:49, I actually am willing to defend CinemaSins here given that (to my recollection) at no other point in any of the four movies do Toys sleep (I know they revert to inanimate when a human shows up but that’s not what’s happening here) and as such it’s legitimate to question why Woody has any need for sleep (he’s not a biological organism) and it’s pretty clearly exclusively to enable this dream sequence. (Yes, I know that’s a nitpick.)
The only thing I'll say about that, is that we literally see toys sleeping in the first film, in that scene when Andy has Buzz in his bed.
Also, in the scene when Woody gets out of Bonnie's bed in the third movie, all of Bonnie's toys are sleeping in that scene.
And Woody sleeps next to Bonnie in the fourth movie, when he's trying to watch over Forky
@@captainvader921 You’re right. I just misremembered the other films.
Sinning cinemasins is a sin... they are hilarious