Thanks again Dr. Tour. I worked for 20 years as volunteer apologist with Dr. Hugh Ross at Reasons To Believe. I was very excited to learn that you are Jewish as well as Christian. I have had my understanding of the Bible and Christianity filled out in such invaluable ways by learning from Messianic Believer ministries like Christian Jew Foundation. You have extra blessings from Yeshua, according to HIs numerous promises.
@@cocoloco5533You obviously have no depth in science, Biology quashes the Fraud of evolution. Every life comes from life, never a spontaneous eruption of life from a clump of goo. Sad that you express nonsense.
@BillG8718 Utter nonsense! What have the scientists ever done in a lab that makes it possible to create any life-form. ZIP, ZERO, NADA... The only thing they care about was is pseudoscience and government grants. If evolution were privately funded, it would go broke in an hour.
@@BillG8718That's a load of bull-pucky. Those papers are only published because they fit the evolutionists narrative. It's all rinse and repeat garbage that gets passed through, for the love of money and not true science, but is pseudoscience, because they have to have a quota of papers that get published.
@@Alec_Cox It's obvious you have no science education or experience at all. You really should stop embarrassing yourself. BTW the topic is abiogenesis, not evolution.
@@BillG8718 Absolutely none, I read the findings from them many years ago in articles from New Scientist and Nature. It turns out the findings were filled with over inflated claims.
He didn't give an answer at all. He just made the lame excuse "the data is already published" but didn't say when or where or by whom. It was an exceptionally craven cop-out.
The two main trolls on Tour's channel, are Dave himself and his "buddy" Aron ra-ra, playing with their multiple sock puppet accounts, with the help of a handful of wannabe sycophantic trolls that hang out on Dave and Aron's channels.
sara walker and lee cronin on assembly theory also posits that information is necessary for things to exist. the combinatorial gap in chemistry to achieve life from abiogenisis is a huge gulf without an intelligence behind it. there are limits, according to them, what random chemistry can do without intelligence
HEY Otangelo Grasso! He's a big time contributor on a bunch of the creation evolution forums I post on. I comment on his stuff all the time! We see eye to eye on like 98% of stuff, except he's big into the Shroud of Turin and I'm kinda meh on that. Definitely linking him to this video!
Re: formation of the Sun during billions of years. Two billions years ago the Sun would be 70% cooler. That's another condition that should be taken into account when proposing ideas of the origin of life.
Questions: Regarding Assembly (Theory) Hypothesis, is it possible to determine the Assembly Index (AI) of Polypeptides, Polysaccharides, Polynucleotides, etc? If so, what would be the AI for these bio-molecules? And what would assembly hypothesis conclude about the intelligent origins of these molecules?
Prebiotic chemistry can't sort, count or spell. How could a mindless, random process sort through 500 different types of amino acids, arranging only the 20 specific in only their left hand forms except glycine. In sequences as specific as 20 amino acid letters spelling protein words of anywhere from 50 to the 35,000 in the muscle protein Titin?Hand a person a couple thousand sets of the 20 particular amino acids and tell him to "spell," sequence a protein. You think those in a warm little pond have any advantage over a person with design and purpose? The simplest cell has 12.6 billion amino acids, averaging 300 each assembled into 42 million proteins. Absurditly ridiculous!
You still make ignorance based personal incredulity into an art form. Extant proteins aren't the only ones possible or the only ones which will support life. They're just the ones we ended up with after almost 4 billion years of evolution.
Maybe OOL researchers don't know the answers to your questions. But they don't think the process was entirely random. That is why they appeal to chemistry and chemical processes, and perhaps physics and physical processes. As for your 42 million proteins, was that for the simplest cell possible or was it for the "average" cell known today, say, something like Saccharomyces cerevisiae? //Absurditly ridiculous!// That’s why OOL researchers know it’s a tough nut to crack, assuming the problem can be solved.
@ Srch: simple cell contains 42 million protein molecules biologists say Scinews jan 11 2018 Srch: absolute minimum set of genes. mycoplasma genitalia 473 256 has been proposed. And ran across Carsonella ruddii, a symbiotic bacterium inside sap feeding insects. Around 160,000 base pairs and 182 protein coding genes
absolutely love how you explain the difference between chemistry and biology. But again, The Bible is restoration history, spiritual re-creation of human beings, after they fell. The God of creation, had an ideal in mind, purpose of creation, and a direction with a goal. God created all the laws which we call science today. Therefore the origin of life is found with the original ideal of God, Genesis 1 is the only pre-fall book in the Bible, and it describes the laws God used for creation.
So the origin of life people are standing by a volcano and an eruption starts so they're hanging out and some basalt forms and hardens by the road they are on and some eruption splatter hits the slabs of basalt and cools rolling down the basalt slope and a tiny impure hardened ejecta iron bb flops off the end of a piece of basalt and onto the road there it sits lopsided and approaching ambient temperature and the origin of life people shriek " We've done it ! " as a vahicle pulls up on the road and stops and the driver says what have you done, and they respond, see, see it ? "We have made a Rolls Royce !"
Dr Tour, as I remember you saying that Dinosaur red blood cells have been found and you said that it can't survive deep time, can you cite the papers and point out closely that said that they have found it? You could even elaborate on the survivability of it purely based on chemistry in the context of geothermal gradient environments.
*Dinosaur red blood cells have been found* Dinosaur red blood cells have NOT been found. What was found were indications (not confirmed) of some molecular residues of hemoglobin breakdown products. The 1997 paper in _Nature_ by Dr. Mary Schweitzer is *Heme compounds in dinosaur trabecular bone* The proposed mechanism for the preservation of these biological molecules is cross-linking with iron molecules which forms virtually indestructible polymers.
Mary Schweitzer-Science-Paleontology-13 Sep 2017 ‘I don't care what they say about me': Paleontologist stares down critics in her hunt for dinosaur proteins Defying conventional wisdom, Mary Schweitzer works to transform dinosaur paleontology into a molecular science "The evidence, which she has laid out in a series of papers in Science and other journals, challenges traditional notions of what a fossil is: a stone replica of the original bone. If that "stone" includes proteins from the living animal, "I don't know what the definition is anymore," Schweitzer says."" The atheistic science "elite" are trying to thwart her as well. They don't seem interested in truth, only in things that support their narrow atheistic religion. They fancy themselves as the high priests of scientism and don't really care about the truth. Money and control, money and control is all they are interested in.
Origin of life research is extremely technical and I am not sure it would be possible for most people to follow anyway. Advanced chemistry and bioenergetics is more than I can follow, so it is hard to expect others to.
The 2024 Nobel Prizes in Physics, Chemistry and Medicine attest to the facts you have repeatedly presented. Is that why you now acknowledge your belief in God and the Salvation of Jesus Christ?
That question is poorly written, he always "acknowledged" his faith after some Nobel Prize winner attest to his research and findings? He always believed and have made public statements about his faith way before his videos got traction for mass attention or some Nobel prize winner to back up his claims about life's origins.
@ denying that something exists is a whole lot different than scientifically disproving it. What we know is that the entire world is covert in a mile or more thick layer of sediments, some of the strata crossing entire continents, containing billions of plant and animal fossils. Now I know that the evolutionary model claims that this has all happened uniformly over millions and millions of years. The problem is that if that were true we would be able to demonstrate it happening that way today. We cannot.
@@littleacorn2244 How much erosion do you think would take place over "millions of years," in sedimentary rock? SEDIMENTARY. Do those rock layers show evidence of being eroded for millions of years before the next layer? Take a look at how fast St. Helens volcanic ash deposited and eroded and compare.
After several years of interaction with the origins of life community, do you have any insights of your own as to how life may have started on a pre-biotic earth?
Until the totally clueless OOL community fail to refute Dr Tour, we need to accept that science is totally unable to account for miracles. In the Beginning... How totally clueless do you need to be to believe that everything around us came from nothing in the absence of an Almighty Creator?
@@cinemadart Until the totally clueless Dr. Tour decides to actually publish his critiques in a peer-reviewed journal the OOL community is perfectly justified in ignoring his religiously motivated blithering.
@@BillG8718 He's explained it many times and he's specifying more of the problems. Remember there is more to creating a living thing than assembling all the pure molecules -- you need to arrange them in a functional configuration and even that may need some unknown step to come alive, doofus.
It’s hilarious. You know that tendency that life has of .. moving of its own accord .. BEHAVIOUR .. more accurately .. behaviour of a conscious entity. As an origin of life researcher you will have it all sewn up when you can coax those chemicals into some conscious self directed behaviour. Why do they never address the fact that they haven’t a clue how that happens , within the materialist paradigm which dominates the scientific community. That being the case how can they hope to solve the puzzle? The Universe (all that is was and will be) grew Einstein from a cosmic egg 🥚 💥… ordered, lawful, geometric, informational, atoms flipping bits as they interact .. therefore a computational, relational, and alive Universe. Big Bang Plasma to Einstein … with some cooling clumping and relating and waiting around for 14 billion years . How it’s done .. the old way .. the way nature managed to do it .. the old fashioned way .. without the help of a single human thought or scientific theory . 🥚 to 🐓 🌱 to 🌳 The Universe grew it all. It’s organismic just like the organisms it grew from plasma via stars planets seas 🌊 and cells 🦠 They say “life is hard” Origin of life is harder .. especially if it’s never occurred to you that the conscious organismic holonic Universe did it without a lab 🧪 or a 🧫 Just the process that every seed or egg uses but at cosmic scale 🥚 💥 👴🏻… hey presto .. I give you Einstein. Just like an organism .. the universe is likely cyclic .. and eternally so . Consciousness is likely primary not matter . No less crazy than something from .. nothing .
Looking at the way cells work, it looks like advanced technology. Let's say it started naturally, might it be that there's something about matter itself, or some "aether" that might shortcut all those combinations and thus beat the odds of a random combination?
As long as you agree that life has evolved over the last 3 billion years, I don't see why it matters much how it got started. The otigin of life will probably always be an open question.
That was sure disappointing. Tour just repeated the same "OOL science can't explain everything so OOL science can't explain *anything* " nonsense he's been chirping for the last decade. He's sticking to the creationist playbook no matter what.
When has he mentioned Creation in his critiques of OOL? His approach is purely scientific. He's in good company. Sir Fred Hoyle pointed out the same weaknesses but without going into the chemistry. He stated that there is a one in 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 chance that life could arise spontaneously.
@@Peter-y5y9i Fred pulled that number straight from his nether regions the same way creationists do now. No one has near enough data to calculate an accurate probability for natural abiogenesis.
I think you have it backwards. Tour’s claim is the OOL can hardly explain anything not that they can’t explain everything. Also creationists DO have explanations for almost everything yet atheists don’t accept them.
What a lame excuse for not published his OOL critiques in professional peer-reviewed journals. Claiming all his evidence is already published by others, he just can't say what it is, or by whom, and where. 😄😄😄
How exactly do you publish a paper detailing how you can't find any processes that permit life to begin? That's like proving a negative. Not possible. Maybe get your quantum computer to do it and show us the way.
@@HuFlungDung2 You publish your *critiques* along with your evidence supporting your critiques. Honest scientists have been doing that for a century but Tour refuses.
@@20july1944 *He explains various aspects of it in all his videos* Flat Earthers explain in their videos why NASA is wrong about the "ball Earth" too. YT videos aren't acceptable science.
THANK YOU Dr. Tour for the incredible amount of work you do all day every day. Your work is VERY much appreciated. God Bless You and your family!!
Life just requires a spirit - its not enough in chemistry. The spiritual life just needs God!
I appreciate everything you put out and that you stick with pure science in your reasoning.
Thanks again Dr. Tour.
I worked for 20 years as volunteer apologist with Dr. Hugh Ross at Reasons To Believe. I was very excited to learn that you are Jewish as well as Christian. I have had my understanding of the Bible and Christianity filled out in such invaluable ways by learning from Messianic Believer ministries like Christian Jew Foundation. You have extra blessings from Yeshua, according to HIs numerous promises.
That calm demeanor amplifies the points significantly, and could very well be a potent supplement in future discussions.
You are a genuine scientist, and much appreciated.
His Faith is THE REAL REASON he gets criticized. Particularly with Laymen.
It's not his faith _per se._ It's the fact he lies about science to push that faith. *THAT'S* why the science community has such problems with him.
@@cocoloco5533You obviously have no depth in science, Biology quashes the Fraud of evolution. Every life comes from life, never a spontaneous eruption of life from a clump of goo. Sad that you express nonsense.
@@Alec_Cox "fraud of evolution" 😆😆😄😄😆😆 Never mind evolution is the most well supported scientific theory in the entire history of science.
@BillG8718 Utter nonsense! What have the scientists ever done in a lab that makes it possible to create any life-form. ZIP, ZERO, NADA... The only thing they care about was is pseudoscience and government grants. If evolution were privately funded, it would go broke in an hour.
@@BillG8718 Evolution isn't the question -- origin of life is the question.
The onus is on OoL researchers to publish papers that provide evidence for their hypothesis.
They have, hundreds of them every year. Which of those papers published in the last year have you read?
THE OOL Crowd has zip zero and Nada to back up their conjectures.
@@BillG8718That's a load of bull-pucky. Those papers are only published because they fit the evolutionists narrative. It's all rinse and repeat garbage that gets passed through, for the love of money and not true science, but is pseudoscience, because they have to have a quota of papers that get published.
@@Alec_Cox It's obvious you have no science education or experience at all. You really should stop embarrassing yourself. BTW the topic is abiogenesis, not evolution.
@@BillG8718 Absolutely none, I read the findings from them many years ago in articles from New Scientist and Nature. It turns out the findings were filled with over inflated claims.
People who hate you criticize you over and over and over for not publishing peer-reviewed papers on OoL. I'm pleased that you gave a good answer here.
He didn't give an answer at all. He just made the lame excuse "the data is already published" but didn't say when or where or by whom. It was an exceptionally craven cop-out.
I don't hate Tour. I just wish he'd stop teaming with the DI to push his creationist garbage.
@@littleacorn2244
You're one of the sock puppet Dave Farina accounts..
@@sliglusamelius8578 Then you must be an animated dog turd given the power of speech by magic. 😄
@@BillG8718 He gave several examples of people who published the problems facing OoL researchers. Did you watch the video?
We all agree that "we don't see how". That doesn't prove it impossible. And we'll never know if we don't look, so what is wrong with that?
The two main trolls on Tour's channel, are Dave himself and his "buddy" Aron ra-ra, playing with their multiple sock puppet accounts, with the help of a handful of wannabe sycophantic trolls that hang out on Dave and Aron's channels.
Stop noticing ‼️‼️‼️
@@codonmatrix4510 Dave's not here man
sara walker and lee cronin on assembly theory also posits that information is necessary for things to exist. the combinatorial gap in chemistry to achieve life from abiogenisis is a huge gulf without an intelligence behind it. there are limits, according to them, what random chemistry can do without intelligence
HEY Otangelo Grasso! He's a big time contributor on a bunch of the creation evolution forums I post on. I comment on his stuff all the time! We see eye to eye on like 98% of stuff, except he's big into the Shroud of Turin and I'm kinda meh on that. Definitely linking him to this video!
Great THANKS ! Keep on ! Are there any news on Your 5 Basic components needed for life ?
Re: formation of the Sun during billions of years. Two billions years ago the Sun would be 70% cooler. That's another condition that should be taken into account when proposing ideas of the origin of life.
Questions: Regarding Assembly (Theory) Hypothesis, is it possible to determine the Assembly Index (AI) of Polypeptides, Polysaccharides, Polynucleotides, etc? If so, what would be the AI for these bio-molecules? And what would assembly hypothesis conclude about the intelligent origins of these molecules?
Prebiotic chemistry can't sort, count or spell. How could a mindless, random process sort through 500 different types of amino acids, arranging only the 20 specific in only their left hand forms except glycine. In sequences as specific as 20 amino acid letters spelling protein words of anywhere from 50 to the 35,000 in the muscle protein Titin?Hand a person a couple thousand sets of the 20 particular amino acids and tell him to "spell," sequence a protein. You think those in a warm little pond have any advantage over a person with design and purpose? The simplest cell has 12.6 billion amino acids, averaging 300 each assembled into 42 million proteins. Absurditly ridiculous!
You still make ignorance based personal incredulity into an art form. Extant proteins aren't the only ones possible or the only ones which will support life. They're just the ones we ended up with after almost 4 billion years of evolution.
Maybe OOL researchers don't know the answers to your questions. But they don't think the process was entirely random. That is why they appeal to chemistry and chemical processes, and perhaps physics and physical processes.
As for your 42 million proteins, was that for the simplest cell possible or was it for the "average" cell known today, say, something like Saccharomyces cerevisiae?
//Absurditly ridiculous!//
That’s why OOL researchers know it’s a tough nut to crack, assuming the problem can be solved.
@ Srch: simple cell contains 42 million protein molecules biologists say Scinews jan 11 2018 Srch: absolute minimum set of genes.
mycoplasma genitalia 473
256 has been proposed. And ran across Carsonella ruddii, a symbiotic bacterium inside sap feeding insects. Around 160,000 base pairs and 182 protein coding genes
Can you please critique the amyloid hypothesis?
absolutely love how you explain the difference between chemistry and biology. But again, The Bible is restoration history, spiritual re-creation of human beings, after they fell.
The God of creation, had an ideal in mind, purpose of creation, and a direction with a goal. God created all the laws which we call science today. Therefore the origin of life is found with the original ideal of God, Genesis 1 is the only pre-fall book in the Bible, and it describes the laws God used for creation.
So the origin of life people are standing by a volcano and an eruption starts so they're hanging out and some basalt forms and hardens by the road they are on and some eruption splatter hits the slabs of basalt and cools rolling down the basalt slope and a tiny impure hardened ejecta iron bb flops off the end of a piece of basalt and onto the road there it sits lopsided and approaching ambient temperature and the origin of life people shriek " We've done it ! " as a vahicle pulls up on the road and stops and the driver says what have you done, and they respond, see, see it ? "We have made a Rolls Royce !"
Dr Tour, as I remember you saying that Dinosaur red blood cells have been found and you said that it can't survive deep time, can you cite the papers and point out closely that said that they have found it? You could even elaborate on the survivability of it purely based on chemistry in the context of geothermal gradient environments.
*Dinosaur red blood cells have been found* Dinosaur red blood cells have NOT been found. What was found were indications (not confirmed) of some molecular residues of hemoglobin breakdown products. The 1997 paper in _Nature_ by Dr. Mary Schweitzer is
*Heme compounds in dinosaur trabecular bone*
The proposed mechanism for the preservation of these biological molecules is cross-linking with iron molecules which forms virtually indestructible polymers.
Mary Schweitzer-Science-Paleontology-13 Sep 2017
‘I don't care what they say about me': Paleontologist stares down critics in her hunt for dinosaur proteins
Defying conventional wisdom, Mary Schweitzer works to transform dinosaur paleontology into a molecular science
"The evidence, which she has laid out in a series of papers in Science and other journals, challenges traditional notions of what a fossil is: a stone replica of the original bone. If that "stone" includes proteins from the living animal, "I don't know what the definition is anymore," Schweitzer says.""
The atheistic science "elite" are trying to thwart her as well. They don't seem interested in truth, only in things that support their narrow atheistic religion. They fancy themselves as the high priests of scientism and don't really care about the truth. Money and control, money and control is all they are interested in.
@codonmatrix4510 Agreed but I was asking about red blood cells though.
@@sabhishek9289
It's not like they are living cells. LOL.
@@jockyoung4491 Well, ancient red blood cells not being alive doesn't reduce the significance of finding them at all.
We have to have some basic chemistry lessons. The vocabulary in not known. All these technical terms.
Origin of life research is extremely technical and I am not sure it would be possible for most people to follow anyway. Advanced chemistry and bioenergetics is more than I can follow, so it is hard to expect others to.
It’s funny that no matter how much of an expert you become the main criticism is that you’re not enough of an expert…😅
🙂🌎⏳🙏♥️
intersting funny dude
The 2024 Nobel Prizes in Physics, Chemistry and Medicine attest to the facts you have repeatedly presented. Is that why you now acknowledge your belief in God and the Salvation of Jesus Christ?
That question is poorly written, he always "acknowledged" his faith after some Nobel Prize winner attest to his research and findings? He always believed and have made public statements about his faith way before his videos got traction for mass attention or some Nobel prize winner to back up his claims about life's origins.
Eventually, China was power everywhere around the world
The biological molecules that do come to earth from outer-space are returning to where they originated from pre-flood.
That's pretty tough since a literal Noah's Flood was scientifically disproven over two centuries ago.
@ denying that something exists is a whole lot different than scientifically disproving it. What we know is that the entire world is covert in a mile or more thick layer of sediments, some of the strata crossing entire continents, containing billions of plant and animal fossils. Now I know that the evolutionary model claims that this has all happened uniformly over millions and millions of years. The problem is that if that were true we would be able to demonstrate it happening that way today. We cannot.
@@garyh2100 Show me the evidence all fossils and all strata across the whole planet were deposited by the same one-year event around 2400 BC.
@@littleacorn2244 How much erosion do you think would take place over "millions of years," in sedimentary rock? SEDIMENTARY. Do those rock layers show evidence of being eroded for millions of years before the next layer? Take a look at how fast St. Helens volcanic ash deposited and eroded and compare.
@@codonmatrix4510 OK, there's one creationist teenager who can't answer the question or provide any evidence.
After several years of interaction with the origins of life community, do you have any insights of your own as to how life may have started on a pre-biotic earth?
HINT: the title of his organization is "JesusAndScience".
He's already stated on his personal web page he believes his Christian God created the universe and everything in it including life.
Until the totally clueless OOL community fail to refute Dr Tour, we need to accept that science is totally unable to account for miracles. In the Beginning...
How totally clueless do you need to be to believe that everything around us came from nothing in the absence of an Almighty Creator?
@@cinemadart Until the totally clueless Dr. Tour decides to actually publish his critiques in a peer-reviewed journal the OOL community is perfectly justified in ignoring his religiously motivated blithering.
@@BillG8718 He's explained it many times and he's specifying more of the problems.
Remember there is more to creating a living thing than assembling all the pure molecules -- you need to arrange them in a functional configuration and even that may need some unknown step to come alive, doofus.
It’s hilarious. You know that tendency that life has of .. moving of its own accord .. BEHAVIOUR .. more accurately .. behaviour of a conscious entity.
As an origin of life researcher you will have it all sewn up when you can coax those chemicals into some conscious self directed behaviour.
Why do they never address the fact that they haven’t a clue how that happens , within the materialist paradigm which dominates the scientific community. That being the case how can they hope to solve the puzzle?
The Universe (all that is was and will be) grew Einstein from a cosmic egg 🥚 💥… ordered, lawful, geometric, informational, atoms flipping bits as they interact .. therefore a computational, relational, and alive Universe.
Big Bang Plasma to Einstein … with some cooling clumping and relating and waiting around for 14 billion years . How it’s done .. the old way .. the way nature managed to do it .. the old fashioned way .. without the help of a single human thought or scientific theory .
🥚 to 🐓 🌱 to 🌳
The Universe grew it all. It’s organismic just like the organisms it grew from plasma via stars planets seas 🌊 and cells 🦠
They say “life is hard”
Origin of life is harder .. especially if it’s never occurred to you that the conscious organismic holonic Universe did it without a lab 🧪 or a 🧫
Just the process that every seed or egg uses but at cosmic scale 🥚 💥 👴🏻… hey presto .. I give you Einstein.
Just like an organism .. the universe is likely cyclic .. and eternally so . Consciousness is likely primary not matter . No less crazy than something from .. nothing .
Looking at the way cells work, it looks like advanced technology. Let's say it started naturally, might it be that there's something about matter itself, or some "aether" that might shortcut all those combinations and thus beat the odds of a random combination?
Well, even if there is such a mystical "natural force", nobody ever found it yet.
It wouldnt be random then.
What do you mean by "naturally"?
@@pigzcanfly444Hey man, How are you doing? I haven't seen you in a while. God Bless
As long as you agree that life has evolved over the last 3 billion years, I don't see why it matters much how it got started. The otigin of life will probably always be an open question.
Then it is not science.
@@stellarspacetraveler
Science is used to look for ways it might have happened. Nobody is claiming more than they have evidence for.
You did this before. We asked several questions ... but never got an answer. What would make it this time different?
The 2024 Nobel Prizes in Physics, Chemistry and Medicine fully support his claims and the claims of all intelligent serious scientists.
@@jameskohl7959 Keep telling yourself these lies.
@@lizadowning4389 and you yours
@@jameskohl7959The prizes support his claims?
@@jameskohl7959
Ah consensus!
That was sure disappointing. Tour just repeated the same "OOL science can't explain everything so OOL science can't explain *anything* " nonsense he's been chirping for the last decade. He's sticking to the creationist playbook no matter what.
When has he mentioned Creation in his critiques of OOL? His approach is purely scientific. He's in good company. Sir Fred Hoyle pointed out the same weaknesses but without going into the chemistry. He stated that there is a one in 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 chance that life could arise spontaneously.
@@Peter-y5y9i Fred pulled that number straight from his nether regions the same way creationists do now. No one has near enough data to calculate an accurate probability for natural abiogenesis.
I think you have it backwards. Tour’s claim is the OOL can hardly explain anything not that they can’t explain everything. Also creationists DO have explanations for almost everything yet atheists don’t accept them.
@@vinnyv949 Tour's opinion and $6.50 will get you a venti latte as Starbucks. Creationists have lame excuses for most everything, not explanations.
@@BillG8718Show us the science then, genius. Oh, you're just spouting the same nonsense that OOL researchers have been publishing for 60 years.
What a lame excuse for not published his OOL critiques in professional peer-reviewed journals. Claiming all his evidence is already published by others, he just can't say what it is, or by whom, and where. 😄😄😄
He explains various aspects of it in all his videos, and he can't prove a negative beyond showing it is essentially impossible.
How exactly do you publish a paper detailing how you can't find any processes that permit life to begin? That's like proving a negative. Not possible. Maybe get your quantum computer to do it and show us the way.
@@HuFlungDung2 You publish your *critiques* along with your evidence supporting your critiques. Honest scientists have been doing that for a century but Tour refuses.
@@20july1944 *He explains various aspects of it in all his videos* Flat Earthers explain in their videos why NASA is wrong about the "ball Earth" too. YT videos aren't acceptable science.
@@BillG8718 We would need to compare one of his vids with a flat earth vid.
How do you think life arose?