Uninsured Driver Claims Witness Is Lying
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 พ.ย. 2021
- Karen says Pamela cut her off and even has an eyewitness to prove it, but Pamela says both women are lying! Who's telling the truth in this frustrating fender bender?
#JudgeJudy
The Original! There’s only ONE Judge Judy. Visit our website for where to watch, weekdays.
Subscribe to Judge Judy on TH-cam: / @judgejudy
It always lapsed the day before the accident and they never knew it was going to happen. Yeah right. Smh
Everytime😆😅🤣😂
But but but...she brought proof that she has coverage NOW! Come on, Judge Judy, doesn't that count for SOMETHING?? 🤣🤣🤣
Lmao yes!!!!!!
Right every court show 😂😂
Yep always right before the accident. Such bad luck 🍀 lol hahaha
“Those without insurance don’t speak!”🤣🤣🤣
Actually saw this whole case. Her policy lapsed months before the accident.
Lol of course it did! Her attitude is insufferable.
I figured as much
Thanks for sharing
Yeah, if you have a laspe in insurance, never does it ever happen all of a sudden lol it's usually at least 2-3 months typically due to not being paid, depending on the company. I used to work in auto insurance and it was a VERY common occurrence. The insurance company is sending you emails/physical mail about it being cancelled if not paid up.
In my looooooong history of having auto insurance (50 years), I have always been notified by my carrier MONTHS prior to the renewal date regarding the policy declarations, coverage, exclusions, rates, discounts, etc. There was never an acceptable excuse for not having continual coverage ..... even with/if anything in the policy is being "rewritten". You pay the premium (either in full or by installment payments) and if anything needs to be change, get it changed and you premium and payments are adjusted accordingly.
Warning to uninsured drivers. If you crash while your policy lapses, you are far more likely to be blamed for the crash. Even if it wasn't your fault. If you lose your insurance for a day, don't drive.
Also, the dog ate her homework.
@@jimwerther Ive been driving 30 years. Ive never had a policy lapse by even a second.
@@RocketRocket-ce3ke
Same here. Perhaps the many reminders sent by the insurance company was a factor. (Apparently, we are the same age.)
That’s a lie, literally was in the same situation as the plaintiff, someone cut right in front of me; their insurance was expired, their plates were expired, but since I hit them from behind it was my fault and I got the ticket.
@@Abraham-np8mm Well if you hit someone from behind, it is your fault. You are supposed to be far enough from the vehicle in front to avoid any contact. Thats the rule worldwide
Your insurance cannot lapse for even 24 hours ! If your car is not insured, don't drive it . Period !
Unfortunately work won’t accept that excuse unfortunately
If you can afford to pay out of pocket for an accident, then it doesn't matter. Of course, the cost of the accident depending on the victim's vehicle, and any possible injuries will require a person to have around 200,000 dollars on hand in an extreme case. In most cases it should be less than ten thousand.
That defendant is unhinged. She shouldn’t be allowed to drive.
It always happens. People's insurance just happens to lapse the day or two before the accident. One of the most common excuses I hear on Judge Judy.
Also, as soon as the witness gets one sentence out, the defendant shouts out "She's lying!"
Yeah, I don't believe the defendant one iota.
Second most common - my cell phone is broken/lost
The funny thing is, she didn't even say anything yet! All she claimed was that she was in the yellow car! She could have waited for her actual testimony! What was she challenging? That the car wasn't yellow?
The dog ate my insurance information lol j/k
SHE MEANT..."I'M LYING"
Or even before they speak in this case😁
This is why you need a dash cam.
Absolutely (as I still don't have one myself 😄)
I purchased one immediately when I bought my new car. A front and rear camera
@@reichan2590 Me too. Now I have peace of mind.
@@Childfree334 same!
Absolutely. Where can you get a dash cam?
Witness: I am the yellow car. The defendant is the blue car.....
Defendant: SHE IS LYING!!!
Me: Pretty clear who the lier is if thats what you call a lie
well I mean the witness was identifying the position of the cars, which was in stark contrast to what the defendant said previously. I mean she's definitely lying, but she's not lying bcuz the car was yellow and hers was blue lol
Liar*😎
I literally yelled at my phone! Even if she was lying, she deserves the opportunity to get the lie out! Lol
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I wonder if she could answer the question ''why?" Why would the witness lie? To what aim? Life, politics and the internet is full of people accusing others of lying but never really explaining what the purpose of the lie could be.
If a witness is totally independent and doesn't know any of the interested parties involved, then it's generally accepted among investigating police officers and insurance companies that they would have no reason to lie about what they witnessed in an accident. In this case, the defendant has plenty of reason to lie.
People have gotten into legal trouble by claiming to not know either party when they indeed know someone involved. basically committing perjury.
@@Fazzel while that does happen occasionally, the vast majority of the time independent witness are truthful about not knowing the parties involved.
For me, the fact that a witness, unrelated to both was willing to come, is fishy. Very fishy. No one likes getting involve in things, unless their is something for them. People have busy lives, families, work. She could have written a signed letter as witness testimony. Or a video detailing her testimony. The idea of someone going out of their way and TRAVEL for an unknown plaintiff, is just not logical. 🐟🐟🐟
@@323azteca anyone whose ever watched a few episodes of Judge Judy knows that she doesn't accept written or video testimonials from witnesses, because she cannot ask questions, gauge responses, etc. The show pays for travel expenses, so that's not a problem here. Plenty of puerile are more than willing to make time in their schedules to help other, and testify in small claims court, without any reward or benefit to themselves. It's logical, when you realize that there are honest people, that simply want to help.
@@323azteca Oh come on, this is *television*. She probably got paid to appear on the show and who wouldn't turn down an opportunity to appear on Judge Judy, especially when the chance of ridicule is so low.
Why did the defendant even try to lie? Location of the damage on both vehicles would tell 90% of the story and it's real easy to spot the lie just from how the defendant tried to 'rewrite' what happened.
Man I wish I could see the whole case
When Byrd laughs at you, you know you're done...lol
If you drive without insurance, you are at fault EVERY TIME. You are operating a vehicle illegally. You are the reason I pay as much as I do.
While your conclusion is correct about operating a vehicle illegally, that doesn't mean you are at fault "every time." For the sake of argument, let's say that there are two vehicles. A and B. Vehicle A's owner goes to a bar, does multiple shots for 2 hours, stumbles to their car, and takes off - but does have insurance.
Vehicle B's owner is driving around, and because they are uninsured, are being extra careful. They follow the speed limits, obey all traffic signals, and so forth.
Vehicle A's driver, having impaired judgement, blows through a red light and slams into Vehicle B.
According to your argument of "every time" Vehicle B is at fault for the accident - even in this extreme example. If you believe so, you may be in need of a rectal-cranial extraction.
@@godaistudios- Well Mr. Duncan, you are assuming A's driver is impaired. Does multiple shots of what? Shirley temples? (That is non-alcoholic. I don't want to spread the cranium thing, so I'll try to make it simple. B's driver has known there was no insurance, thus making their fault. Had they not been operating, no accident. Even if the shots were booze, was there an underlying medical issue? Emotional? These are called mitigating circumstances. Getting a DUI is accidental. Driving without proper documentation is a choice.
@@conjugalvisitor5532 Getting shots is very clear in its meaning and follows common sense. If you are lacking common sense, try using google and type in "having shots at a bar" and see if it's ambiguous.
Getting drunk is a choice. Getting behind the wheel after getting drunk is also a choice. There may be no intent on getting into an accident, but the circumstances leading up to that were choices nonetheless.
Keeping in mind that I'd already researched the matter, the laws determining a person at fault for the accident strangely enough don't include the status of insured or not. Funny that.
That's not to say that there aren't some very real pitfalls for not having insurance even if you aren't at fault for it, but being at fault EVERY TIME (emphasis yours) doesn't hold up.
@@conjugalvisitor5532 His argument for possible sakes scenario doesn't include a person drinking a non alcoholic beverage, the person in his example is impaired by alcohol so what's your point? And what do you mean "getting a DUI is an accident. Driving without documentation is a choice" ?
That's literally the most foolish thing I have read all day. You're telling me that people accidentally drink loads of alcohol and accidentally gets in a car drunk and accidentally turns the key in the ignition and accidentally drives? No! That is a choice and a far more dangerous choice and far more immoral. It may be illegal to drive without insurance but that's just legal speaking, but has nothing to do with objective morals. Everything in your entire point is factually invalid and quite frankly embarrassingly stupid.
I do think people should be insured when driving of course but your statement is just plain foolish.
wait is it illegal to drive without insurance? I thought you just need warranty and a rego (if your diesel you also need ruc)
You gotta love the amount of uninsured drivers this show gets, it’s quite amazing in fact.
One in seven on the road have none. So insure yourself to the hilt.
Her auto insurance was being "re-written" because after the accident she called and said "I can make my payment now."
I have experience in the insurance industry.
Now, whether one sees their agent in person or makes contest over the phone, or makes the application on line, no policy is ever 'being re-written'..That is a BS Story.
The fact is the defendant allowed her policy to lapse. Bottom line, she was uninsured. She's rationalizing that its possible to be a little bit pregnant.
One is either insured or they are not. There is no such thing as 'almost' or 'sort of ' insured.
@@patersonplankrd Exactly. I had my policy "re-written" when I had moved to another state, needed to add another car, and increase the liability limits. It took about 15 minutes with Progressive, over the phone. There was no lapse in coverage, not even for a second, on my first vehicle.
Wait so there was a staff of people rewriting her insurance? Like special insurance? 🤣😂🤣right lady, right.
It's so rare for a stranger/witness to step up to get involved for another person.
If I loose my insurance for one day I won’t drive until I get it back
She did the opposite
It's so hard for some people to just be honest and own up to their mistakes. People like the defendant are exactly why I implore anyone to get a dashcam.
Such a great idea! You are so right about people not being honest and owning up to their mistake. Well said.
Everyone agrees that it's wrong to break into someone's house and steal their money.
Amazing how many people will lie about a car accident and try to rob someone of thousands.
It's not about being right/wrong
If they can break into someone's house and steal miney without getting caught, I'm sure at least half of humans would do it, probably more along the lines of 80%.
With suing, it feels to them that it's more "legal", if they can win the case, they're just going to win the money, no need to be scared of the police, etc.
@@jamhamtime1878 80% would steal if they knew could get away with it? You might want to consider getting some more honest acquaintances.
Jam you have some shitty acquaintances if that’s your experience
@@paullambert8701 wouldn't you think 80% of people stole something before? If you don't think that you are incredibly sheltered
@@flaqko5686 I do think it is closer to 50-65%, however since there is no really context on the amount of money up for grabs it is hard to say. A few dollars, not worth it. A few thousand will more people. There is also a way to think about who it is taken from, as if we learn what happens to them if we steal that would deter a lot of people (maybe 20-35%) However this is all only from my experience.
Also Paul is right in the sense that Jam needs to be around different people, 80% of people stealing thousands isn't a great number, either that or Jam has just lost faith in humanity.
P.S. this isn't meant to be mean or anything towards you Flaqko, I just wanted to add my opinion on the matter, and counter the point you made in one comment.
2:40 lady didn't even talk yet and the defendant was calling her a liar lol.
You need to open your eyes! She didn't call her a liar until 2:50, by then the witness had claimed that she was the yellow vehicle. Do humanity a favor and don't do anything close to law. Yea? (Idiot!/Clickbait)
@@madfamily1686 lol simmer down there big guy.
@@c420yr Yea, sorry I was drunk and really upset for some reason. I apologize.
Defendant immediately looks like an elitist Karen
wasn't able to find the rest of this episode. did find another segment where judge judy gets to talk to the defendant's daughter. she said they were going home, and made a left. but then they said their home was down the road they were in, so why turn left at that particular place where their house was about 5 miles down the road they were in, instead of waiting another 5 miles and then turning left.
one thing I learned is, one of the plaintiff's parents was in the Military (or maybe she's married and her husband is or was in the Military). otherwise she would have a different insurance company, not USAA
Yep a chubby entitled Karen
A Karen probably wouldn't let their insurance lapse tbf
Nothing elitist about her, she’s in Walmart yoga clothes with those teeth and that hair. Probably a housewife.
Looks more like trailer trash to me.
Judge Judy takes no BS and does not suffer fools; If we had more leaders and judges like Judge Judy, our country would be a much better place!
Very true. I hate seeing our country going down the shitter.
Ppl should not be driving around without insurance
Lol at the people who keep interrupting even when judge Judy tells them not to.
If people who are uninsured had to spend 30 days in jail for non coverage I doubt if they would let their coverage lapse for one day.
Ooooh! Burn! TRUE BURN!
Good idea!
For one day? not even for one minute.
ABSOLUTELY.
Dude, reading that one line gave me a headache. People like you should also spend time in jail, hopefully you'll learn some syntax there! Ugh!
Judy ain't lying about those "one day lapse" people. I was in court for ticket and there was probably 60 people in there and I'd say 1/3 of them that were there said that about their insurance.
The best part of this is when JJ ruled for the plaintiff and the look on the defendants face when she heard how much she has to pay. Oh wait they cut that part out WTF???? These aren't even worth watching
Witness: points out which vehicle is which, as we already knew
Defendant: SHES LYING
That was pretty wild
🤣😭😭
Hate when they don’t show full episode!!
As tough as Judge Judy is, she is always fair. All the best regards to you, Judge Judy.
I wish that we could see the judgement of these cases.
Same
YEAH......I'M GOING TO STOP VIEWING THE CASES.....JUST FOR THAT REASON
You can if you watch original episodes
@@rosegold-beats and if they had any info on it like a season and episode people probably would...
Me too
Thx 4 sharing. Make more plz
How serendipitous that the car insurance always lapses right before the accident. SMH.
I'm 43 years old. I've been an insured driver since I was 16. I have never been in an at-fault accident. So the odds of these drivers (and there are many on Judge Judy) happening to get into accidents on the ONE DAY they don't have active insurance is baloney. They just don't bother with insurance and hope to skate below the radar, until the day they get mad at the long commute and decide to cut off an insured driver...
"The stamp fell off the envelope". Who makes payments by conventional mail any more???🤣🤣🤣
“The stamp fell off of the envelope”. 😂😂😂😂 Love JJ
If you don't have insurance, it should be automatic fault on you, legally. Enough of this.
Would be better if they actually showed the verdict on here
Is there any question of the verdict?
Where are the full episodes?
I love the guy at 3:05 laughing and having to cover his mouth.
Why do these ladies make every statement sound like a question.
I don't believe that the defendant didn't have insurance for just 1 day. I believe that she hadn't had insurance for a lot longer.
I'm so grateful they started putting part numbers in the videos. Does anyone know where I can find this full case? There are only two parts I could find on the channel, but It seems like there are several parts missing.
Why do you allow your insurance to expire then continue driving? So irresponsible
This is why you get yourself a dashcam...
Defendant also needs Dental Insurance. And, GAP Insurance :D
I like when people with NO insurance think they can Juke Judy into letting them slide..
Man, if dashcams were widely available back when this was filmed, the dashcam footage would have shut someone right up.
With dashcam footage the case would never even go to court.
@@paul16451 Not necessarily. Because if the plantive only has liability coverage, she's not going to get much help, outside the courts in settling her case.
In the Uk it's illegal to have no insurance. Driving without it will cost you a hefty fine and points on your licence. Accrure enough points and your licence gets taken away
Works that way in the US too. A towing and impound fee as well if you get stopped.
Same applies to most US States .
IN my home state, if an auto policy is in lapse, the vehicle owner has FIVE days to turn the license plate into the DMV.
In order to get the plate back, the vehicle owner is required to produce proof of valid insurance and must pay a reinstatement fee of $100.
Failing that, unless the vehicle is sold or ownership transferred to another party, the title updated to reflect the sale and the vehicle registered in the new owner's name, the court of jurisdiction issues a warrant for arrest of the vehicle owner.
Same in the US. But ppl just ignore it.
How are you doing over there? Hopefully staying safe.
The defendant can't keep her mouth under control during a court hearing... imagine her controlling a car.
I have been driving for 30 years. There has never been a single day that my insurance ever lasped.
I want to see this whole episode. 🤣🤣
Judge Judy is amazing!
Why were there no photos of the damage?
If the defendant’s car had damage only in the back, then she’s telling the truth. If the damage is on the driver’s side, then she’s lying.
The stamp fell off the envelope 😂👍🏻
No insurance? No drive. Get an Uber!
It’s interesting that every lowlife who didn’t have car insurance let the policy lapse just the day before the accident. Inconvenient Eh?
Well yeah, most likely she didn't have insurance for weeks or maybe months
LOL! I loved how JJ was like, I've literally had my entire month of November sweeps period with people like you. I can understand that life gets tough and you can't afford car insurance, but to lie like that. Hilarious!
Somebody who drives around without insurance doesn’t speak.
That was a verbal body slam!
Gooooosh. Wheres the rest of this.🤬
You can tell with the speed at which the defendant talks that she is lying.
And anyone who pays $2500 for a vehicle isnt thinking about insurance or plain cant afford it.
Not having car Insurance really tells you all you need to know.
That lady needs to lose her attitude she’s very very rude and I’m talking about the defendant I automatically knew that she was at fault just by the way she is talking
My thoughts: First, the witness for the plaintiff was NOT lying, 2nd the counterclaim was dismissed due to no insurance, third the plaintiff never got a ticket for speeding
If you have no insurance, you can't file a false complaint for damage when it was NOT the plaintiff's fault. You can't interrupt the witness when he/she is talking, only the judge can do this.
I have yet to hear someone say the dog ate my policy paperwork, but I’m sure some day someone will use it as an excuse .
There's certain etiquette and requirements you must have to win your case on JJ
1. Talk slow and loud
2. Ladies no off the shoulder tops or you'll be asked to put on a sweater
3. Pitbull owner- Sorry but you already lost lol
4. Don't talk about your feelings- That's for the Dr.Phil show
5. Ummm.. Is not an answer!!! 😅
Where's pt 2?
Perfect time to put in dash cam advertise, lol
This is why everybody needs dash cams!!
the defendant clearly lives in her own world...a world where neither auto insurance nor a decent hairdresser is needed
The gall to interrupt the judge- what do they think Judge Judy isn’t listening?! Just… and it delays everything,, so entitled and ill mannered
I wish people would shut up when JJ isn’t addressing them.
You shouldn’t drive like this anyway, but especially not when you don’t have insurance lol
You should adopt the UK rules.
If you're caught driving without insurance the vehicle is immediately seized (you walk home) and they can issue a £300 fine and put 6 points on your licence (amass 12 points and you lose your licence). It doesn't matter if the vehicle isn't yours and the owner has insurance, it's the driver that has to be insured. The owner has 7 day to provided documents that prove the vehicle was insured at the time of the incident, if they can't the vehicle gets crushed.
Theres a huge gap in the defendant's story
Just because you scream out, "You're lying", doesn't make it true.
The moment I heard she has no insurance, "Right... she's done for!"
I would love to see the rest of the case.
Two words. Dash Cam! Problem solved
Never ceases to amaze me. You get a certain date to pay your insurance every month. You don't pay the insurance lapses. Even if it's a 1 day lapse it's a lapse and you shouldn't drive that day or for any amount time that the policy lapses." I have insurance right now" so what? That means nothing. You still didn't have insurance the day of the accident and that day is the only one that counts
Location of the damage will show who is teling the truth.
Everyone says that when they don't have insurance
“I am the yellow vehicle, the defendant is the blue” “SHES LYING”
what is the sense of putting up an video if you can't see the ending of the case ? I would never drive my car without insurance because of people like her who have no insurance. Then the price of the insurance goes out even if it's not your fault.
I have seen the whole video somewhere. If I can find it, I will post the link for you. The defendant’s daughter was in that one.
@@christinedenise7844 Thanks I look forward to seeing the whole video
@@fromnh1840 finally found it! I don’t think it’s the “whole” thing, but at least there is more!!
th-cam.com/video/XuF81yD8gzY/w-d-xo.html
Oh boy. JJ doesn’t like drivers with no insurance/lapsed insurance. The defendant should have just paid for the plaintiffs car. That’s a big no-no!!
I was pulled over because the insurance on my trailer had lapsed for almost two years. we have our liability through the state which is not optional but our comprehensive fire theft and so on through a private company. When we renewed our insurance the liability didn't go through but the comprehensive did. The truck was fine both were coming out. The cop was really good about it and was pretty certain we were telling the truth since the annual cost of the Liability was $57.00. We just stayed in the parking lot until morning and a quick phone call later we were on the road. He wasn't a traffic cop and let us know the traffic guys were doing a blitz that weekend. Sure enough on the way out of town there was a line up of cars pulled over.
My Accord was side swiped by an illegally lifted SUV. Uninsured motorist and driver’s license was expired. Phoenix, Arizona police didn’t give him a ticket.
1 . You cannot change lanes if the lines are solid
2. You cannot change lanes 60 meters of an intersection
If I ever went on courtroom TV, my goal would be to say as little as possible. In a case like this, I'd have an impartial witness, and the defendant had no insurance and an attitude. I have absolutely faith that Judge Judy can take care of her courtroom, and my smile would get a little bigger every time the defendant shouted out. I'd have a front row seat to a person digging their own grave.
I hate how the defendant talks... she talks like she's always right about everything and she's so matter of fact about it. She's definitely an annoying, entitled karen.
Is there a Part 2 to this video? I'm pretty sure I know how JJ is going to rule on this case but would love to hear more fabricated stories from the defendant and potentially pictures.
Random witnesses have the most reliable testimonies. They don’t know either of the two parties. There is no reason for them to lie about what happened. Most people who witness an accident, drive on by and don’t want to be involved. If someone who is impartial and isn’t benefiting from the outcome, takes the time out of their day to testify in a case, they are most likely telling the truth.
I bet that witness was happy to take a trip to LA and be on judge Judy. talk about a great day
Does anyone know where we can view the conclusion to this case?
"My insurance lapsed the day before" Said every uninsured driver ever.
I keep full coverage for this very reason. My car is free and clear of any lien.
WHY ARE THESE NOT THE FULL EPISODES? Or at least cover the verdict? It’s like spending your entire dinner staring at the chocolate mousse dessert and then going to the bathroom and coming back and it’s gone
You don't know the verdict?
Why? To entice you to watch it on tv.
I had an accident a couple of years ago where the woman had no insurance and she tried to cover it by renewing her policy right then and there. It didn't work just like I suspected would happen. As far as I can tell she got into a lot of trouble that night. After her insurance of course denied the claim 🙄 🙄🙄 I didn't bother going any further with it since it was just a minor fender bender
YOUR INSURANCE COMPANY WOULD HAVE GONE AFTER THEM TO GET THE MONEY . MEANWHILE UOUR MONTHLY INSURANCE PAYMENT WENT UP
@@delilahgillis5287 Hence why it was not worth it for a minor fender bender. Now the accident that I got into this morning on the other hand...😬😬😬😬😬😬😬
Wow, what an _____l_.
@@AntoniusReginaldus Yep.
In the UK, its illegal to not have insurance. She'd get arrested and fined and possible prison sentence