Note: All the facts that have been discussed in the video have been well researched by our content team. Please refer to the research document here: bitly.ws/KpEB
Akbar never fought a single battle on field, and Maharana Pratap never lost a war against him It's only when Maharana died of an infection he waged a war against Mewar.
That's the fault of 70 years ruling congress . When I was studying all we read about is akbar and babar and mughal and there was literally so small paras or jsut 2 lines about indian fighters like maharana pratap, shivaji , rani lakshmi bai
I mean yeah, He is wrong but there are always levels to it. One who kills a thousand and one who kills a couple are both wrong, But on different levels.
@@zaki2309 whenever invasions done its meant to destroy country's culture and loot its fortune .... and Mughals were the invaders ... so there"s 90% chances what she said is truth ..... and mughals were known to write history they pleases with....... if mughals were really that good as written in schools history textbook then they never would invade india in first place ........i dont know why u people supports such people just cause they belongs to your culture... can't you distinguish between right and wrong???? ....... does your culture really preach the idea of destroying others culture???
In NCERT we read about the "good" things Mughals did. Which is a big fat lie. I don't know why NCERT doesn't teach us about The great Maharana Pratap, who sacrificed his life for independence, and the great Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj. I usually discuss the facts I learn from RAAZ with my history teacher and he says that the facts are true but we all are forced to read the lie that Muslim historians wrote. I hope one day they'll make a change in the textbooks, and let the other generation know the truth. It's painful when I hear that students know whose son was Akbar and whose father was Babur, but they don't know anything about the real great warriors and kings of the history.
It's okay, our syllabus only cover the basic points, if you are truly interested, gotta learn a few things by yourself. We were taught french in school, still weren't capable of holding single good conversations, learnt it by ourselves and doing a fairly good job. It's time we move on from blaming our sylllabus and education system.
AND NO ONE IS EVEN CLEARLY EXPLAINING THE WHOLE STORY TOO. JUST TEACHING US TO COMPLETE THE SYLLABUS AUR HUM BENSTOKES RATTA MAARE JAA RAHE HAI TAAKI YEH BAKWAAS PADH KE MARKS MIL JAYE. THU HAI AISE CHAPTERS PAR BE
@FUCKukraine69 even Jodha named women never existed a made up story by Mughal writer and poets and still mak a movie on them rather they forgets baapa rawal 35 muslim arab wives and 450 years of slavery of Uzbekistan and Afghanistan,Iran and Iraq by great Hindu kings lalitaditya muktapida and bappa rawal ji and etc Kashmir became his capital
@@noise7150 Akbar was not a kind ruler. He was a vicious and a ruthless ruler whose aim was to expand the boundaries of his empire. Although he adopted din i ilahi principle and imposed jaziya. His main motive towards these principles was to make rajputs happy because he knew that without the support of rajputs and hindus he cannot run his empire in india 🤣🤣🤣🤣cry now
Hindu kings were not United ,that's the reason Mughals ruled Bharat. Till now Hindus have not learned from its mistakes. Still fighting with each other
Our history is full of atrocities against women's and sudras .....they had suffered too much until islam arrived in india....akbar even tried to stop sati system and child marriage
How can you unite when you worship a monkey, an elephant, cows, nude women and other humans and their private parts? - Worship the Creator ☝️ (Ooperwala ☝️, sab deknewala, sab sunnewaala, sab jaanewaala) NOT the creations!
In Short. Rajasthan history books will now say that Maharana Pratap defeated Akbar during Battle of Haldighati. If Akbar had won, why he attack Rajputs six times, education minister questioned. Until now, students were taught that the battle ended inconclusively.
Akbar won decisively,even Portuguese ambassador's historians reported that Pratap ran away from the Battle of Haldighati when he saw his army getting destroyed. He was injured and barely managed to flee. Meanwhile after the battle,Akbar commissioned more campaigns to conquer mewar once Pratap ran away😂this is coming from even non-indians. The whole world laughs at Maharunner Pratap
Maharana Pratap hi haldighaati jeete the to isse tumko kya Mila ?Haldighati ke yudhh me Maharana Pratap ka sabse vishvasniye Hakim Soor Khan tha aur Is yudhh me Akbar maidan me tha hi nahi uske lie uske Pradhan senapati Raja Man Singh kamaan sambhal rahe the.
हमारी पूर्वजों ने जो कुछ हमे दिया है उसका हमेशा आभारी रहूंगा 🙏🏻 हमे हिन्दु बनाये रखने के लिए हमारी हिफाजत के लिए इन्होंनो बहुत दुख झेला है 😢😢 हमारी माता भी वीरांगना थी आपके जौहर पे हमे गर्व है 😭😭🙏🏻🙏🏻
Chal saale jab koi cruelty Hui hi nhi to kaun sa urgent change pagal hai kya dimaag se Tum logo ki problem pata hai kya hai ki tum logo se kisi ki aachai nhi suni jaati
Tum logo ki problem pata hai kya hai ki tum logo se kisi ki aachai nhi suni jaati Maharana Pratap is great no one denied this Akbar at his place was also great respect great man and don't spread hate just because ki wo ek Mughal hai Didi tumhari problem hai ki tumhe hazam nhi ho rha ki Mughal hone ke bawazood Aaj use itni izzat kyu mil rhi hai bas or koi content na ho to kuch bhi non sense bana do
Exactly….sirf Akbar ko hi great kyo bola gaya ? Ye sab facts koi pehli baar samne nahi aa rahe … sabhi ko pata he Akbar ne mandir jalaye , shastra jalaye , jabarzasti shadiyan ki … lekin hamare historians ne use Great kaha aur kahalawaya .. kyo kyonki unhe aisi government se orders the jise Muslim votes chahiye the … fact ye he😊
I went that "Jawalamukhi Mata temple " and that jawala is still there and that chatra which was given by Akbar was also there in khandit form . That's power of Devi ma . Which makes our belief more powerful and strong in sanatan dharma . Jai Mata di ♥️
All thanks to our then govt who had no self respect & wer in favour of portraying Nehru & these Moghul kings as the heroes All Thanks to their dirty mindset India couldn’t progress for so many years
The Battle of Haldighati was a battle fought on 18 June 1576 between cavalry and archers supporting the Rana of Mewar, Maharana Pratap; and the Mughal emperor Akbar's forces, led by Man Singh I of Amber. Where Akbar defeated Rana Pratap.
The Battle of Haldighati was a battle fought on 18 June 1576 between cavalry and archers supporting the Rana of Mewar, Maharana Pratap; and the Mughal emperor Akbar's forces, led by Man Singh I of Amber. Where Akbar defeated Rana Pratap.
When I was younger, I liked the film 'Jodha Akbar' a lot... Now, gradually that I have become aware of such matters, not only that I don't like it anymore but also I feel like how can they romanticize such a relationship... It was anything but a romantic relationship... 😑
Frr I also thought Akbar was great But after seeing this video I don't even like Akbar anymore I always I wished I was born in Akbar's era but Not anymore i would be dead meat if i was born in his era Being pretty in Akbar's era seems horrible too If you're pretty you would have to go to his Haram ( forcefully) If i was born ugly in his era i would still be dead cause like she said they would also kill woman and childs I'm glad that ik about his history rn
This is an eye opener!! Didn't know these facts about akbar. Was he really great? What sort of history are we even learning? Thank god at least our native people have written about Ch. Shivaji Maharaj and Maharana Pratap so that we know our real history and stories of our real heroes. Jai bhavani Jai Shivray 🙏🙏
he would not have sleep at night maharana pratab grand dautger i guss she went in thos women room wear womens would be shetook swoed and atteck akbar then akber beggged for life
Funnily history call them great who brought nothing but destruction. For example Alexander the great, Ashoka the Great, the great Timur, Napoleon the great and Genghis Khan. Rulers who ruled to preserve cultural heritage and peacefully were never accounted as great. They were called calm, weak or peace loving.
One thing Maha Rana Pratap never lost any battle and Fatehpur Sikri with Selim Chisti Dargah and Buland Darwaja was established to celebrate the victory over Gujrat.....
It is good to see that young generation is coming forward to expose the atrocities of Mughals, exposing the so called secular history, colonial mindset.Really,it is a new tide of regeneration, rewrite and to know our culture, history
@@CentristGovtt later he accepted Buddhism and people became incompetent to fight. Muslims killed Buddhist who cheated hindus and helped them against hindus as for Muslims only muslims are human
@@casualuser2317 atleast he had that much courage to enter into the battle field although he knew he had few soldiers (20,000) and fight against 80,000 AFGHANI soldiers. Where akbar was so afraid of Maharana Pratap that he refused to fought the battle. With only 20,000 Mewari he was capable enough to kill that Man Singh. And if u talk about his running, then brother it was needed as he was one of the last hope for all the BHARATIYA, Indian women and children for their safety as all the invaders(afghani eg akbar) were filled with lust of women. So, Maharana Pratap never lost any battle and akbar never fought. For Indians Maharana was, is and will always the winner bcz he fought for your and my motherland.
@@ManviBharadwaj05 you don’t understand the rules of war and battle There’s only one rule- you either win or lose. And Maharana pratap lost and therefore ran away no matter what excuses are followed. It’s an inevitable fact one must accept
Even today we have not full knowledge about the brutal reign of Mughals,and due to our useless education system and great politicians,it is still hard to say that truth will be revealed 😔😔
What's there more to know about muslim rulers ? As always it will be cruelty and violence beyond words. Even today these men can't do away with violence as we witness at this age and time.
*ISLAM nafrat jhooth loot dhokha havas halala balatkar atank narsanhar ka mazhab hai.* *G0d exists but Arabic Shaitan ALLAH Dalla IS FAKE creation and fake ID of PIGamber MuhaMAD atanki balatkari bachi-chod gunda daku.*
True, when history will be made in Nagpur and it will be copied and pasted in WhatsApp, what will happen, but do history and the world does not believe in will😂😂🙏
Ya, just like our religious textbooks white-washed the violent warrior king Krishna, who also treated and bartered women as sex slaves/commodities: Mahabharata 4.72: "And Krishna gave unto each of the illustrious sons of Pandu numerous female slaves, and gems and robes." Krishna’s father Vasudeva also had a over a thousand concubines. Mahabharata 14.7: "The Brahmanas and Kshatriyas, and Vaisyas, and wealthy Sudras, set out, keeping before them the 16,000 women that had formed Vasudeva’s harem, and Vajra, the grandson of the intelligent Krishna."
People have to understand one thing, it's not about religion, almost all great conquerors, be it Alexander, Genghis Khan, Ashoka or Akbar, they all have a history of brutality. It's not just exclusive to Akbar, big conquerors were raised in a certain way to execute power and be extremely brutal, so that the rest surrender. This video could be a great conspiracy theory, but still is partly true, these emperors were called "the great" for a reason which should not be ignored. Even mother Teresa and Gandhiji are said to have these "dark sides" that netizens love to talk about.
Exactly what I feel. Suppose if you are a very good person and listen to people politely and follow their wishes, any stronger king would come and displace you in just a second! He has to be their king, not slave, for that they definitely have to be strong and cruel. And no one ever preached Akbar as a holy person, he was ‘ Great’ for his administrative skills and as a king!
@@prodyutguha6779 tere andar bahut dimag hai bata kitne percentage tune bana liye the apne 10th and 12th boards mein (honestly) agar itna bol rahe ho to. Baat ye hai na ki galat tum bhi ho aur wo bhi but fark sirf itna hai ki tum log har cheez ki negative sides lete ho kabhi socha akbar ne jodha bai ko as a wife rakkha but according to Islam no one can marry anyone with different religion. Sirf itna hi nhi balki use apni baaki patniyon se zyada respect aur care di. Akbar aur Maharana pratap bahut hi achche rulers the aur unke era mein dono muslims aur hindu bhai bhai banke rehte the. Akbar to bahut choti age mein raja ban gaya tha due to death of humayun. Don't you have the courage to encourage him instead of making fun and pointing out the negative side of every thing. Muslims are not bad , the mind is that thing which is controlled by some uneducated illitrate foolish personalities to divert the mind of charming ones. Well no offence, Respect both of them . Jai Hind Peace out
@@masluckyt6472ha Kiya tha sadi akwar ke pass Sara raj tha or Rajput or Muslim ek hote he farq bus itna he ki Rajput Hindu he or Muslim Rajput Alag he
I m form kangra district of Himachal here is a temple jwalaji as she told in the video where Akbar tried to harm jawala mata but he could not so he gifted sone ki chattri here but mata refused to accept it as the metal changed now ....jai jwala mata....🙏❤️
My grandfather's brother who is now no more has written a book called Indians resistance to early muslim invaders in which it is clearly mentioned that what we used to study in schools or even colleges was just portrayed in a way that all the mughals were like Gods and they never showed the dark side of it.
Akbar adulterated Hindu scriptures in the name of din -e -Ilahi. All Mughals were cruel. Not only aurangzeb ( ofcourse he was the most cruelest of all that's why history can't hide it) History is written by winners . Ashoka was cruel also no matter what how hard he tried to hide Kalinga cruelty,
We had a history book in secondary school, it wasn't ncert as I studied in the cisce board, it had a line quoted, "Akbar was one of the best rulers India has ever seen."
We were always told about the goodness of Mughals in school and because of which we never know the reality. Buy now I'm glad that I never took my school text book or so called NCERT history book seriously.
@@GSds657Bhenchod tho yeh tha voh chodu bhagat...indian history majak hai kya...hum students' ko appeal krni chahiye government se to rewrite our history...
@@kavitameghani7932 But fact is fact "Mughals were cruel" 💯. Isn't it?? So why even in this 21st century muslims portray them as hero?? Most of the times I have seen muslims get irked and then come to defend these mughals. Why so?? 😑 Why muslims have sympathy for such tyrants/barbarians?? Because they converted kafirs to islam or what??
Really happy to see you addressed jawalamukhi incident in the video ,my hometown is himachal ,jawala ji & i never see anyone addressing this incident in any other video,good effort ,great video❤
No one can resist this - mughal won because of rajasthan rajput king's kindness..nd i m rajasthani nd proud that our motherland gave us these great rajput kings..bt same time i feel bad for their over kindness..agr wo shivaji jaise hote to mughlo ki haisiyat whi lootero wali hi rh jati ✌️✌️
First things first It’s Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj And I don’t think Rajputs were defeated due to the kindness and all Actually Akbar bribed many Rajput rajas and subehdars to turn up against Maharana Pratap amongst which was RAJA MAN SINGH l. And for the victory in haldi ghati war RAJA MAN SINGH was one of the NAVRATNAS of Akbar .
Let's talk about current generation scenario rajput girls of North India are having muslim bf n declares in Instagram . Hindus never learnt from their history n bound to be vanish for their secularism .
@@nickpartha8643 yupp this is ridiculous 😑😑why girls trust them after see the dangerous incident from their own eyes 🙄🙄bevkoof aurtein 😑or mjhe sbse jyada gussa Mohandas karamchand Gandhi pe aata h..bhudha khud to ahinsa ahinsa krke marr gya or hinduo k hath m tokra de gya ahinsa ka 😑mjhe lgta h jroort se jyada ahinsaa napusankta ki nishani hoti h 🙄
@@adityabairagi3738 don't teach me that it's chatrapati shivaji maharaj..i respect him..even I think more then u..love nd respect both are saparate things..some people say - Ganesha..some say shree Ganesha..some - ganeshji..that doesn't mean that only those who say "shree Ganesh ji Maharaj" respect Ganesh ji..😑😑be mature..even in villages we told our father's name..by name if some old person ask..bt in cities we say shree ------ ji.. 😒😒nd second.. prithviraj Chauhan beat md gauri 16 times..bt every time he leave him due to kindness..nd mostly kings used to do this 😑so Mughals know that these kings can be won by heart nd emotions bt not by the war..its a fact ✌️
@@dr.nishachoudhary5135 it’s good that you respect him .. I also have huge respect for each and every Hindu king who fought for their motherland against the Mughals ……. Prithviraj Chauhan defeated md Gauri 16 times I agree ….. but does that chance the fact that the mighty Rajputs were not betrayed by some of their own men? Does it change the fact that if Raja man Singh didn’t fall for the offerings of the Mughals , the Rajputs could’ve easily defeated the Mughals . Marathas , Rajputs both lacked one thing that is unity …. They turned against their own motherland for what the Mughals bribed them for . If some of the Rajputs or Marathas were united and not greedy the Mughals stood no chance against them.
After hearing all the facts I realised one thing. Sati pratha that sanatani used to do with the widow wife because after the husband died due to any reason the wife became unprotected and during mughal emperor mughals were the predators for the women who doesn't jave husbands. So it's preferable to die with the dead husband rather suffer being in a haram. Like rajputana women used to do johar. Similar thing
I used to think this too but it wasn't the case it was started before Mughal invasion in small masses then after the invasion it became more prominent in society 😅. We should accept that sati was the evil of society. Second is jauhar it wad done by queen and the wives of other soldiers in order to protect their dignity after their husbands martyred
Sati pratha was existing long before Sultani and Mughal period. The widow women mostly misused by the male members of their own family. Besides, to have the possession over their husband ' s property it was introduced. During ancient period it was not there. Even no Hindu scripture does encourage the sati pratha. Thanks and regards.
Bhai agar itny brave thy sab to mughal itni sadion tak hakumat kesa krty rhy? Aur agar hinduon ko marna hota to hindus delete na hojaty india se abtak?
As a Hindu, I can never forgive what these Mughals did! High time we Hindus realise that it's our responsibility to preserve our existence by inculcating right values in our generation. 'Twinkle Twinkle Little Stars' should be replaced with glories of Maharana Pratap, Rani Lakshmibai, Shivaji, etc. What's worse is our young generation moving away from its roots on the name of modernity and some influence of western culture. Be up with the world, embrace change but not at the cost of compromising with your traditions and roots. May almighty lord Mahadev enlighten every lost soul! Har Har Mahadev... 🤍
Everything is okay. But you shouldn't have put Rajat Tokas on the thumbnail. He's gem of an actor and he just portrayed Jalaluddin Akbar. You should have used his paintings for thumbnail.
Akbar ki mummy ko kisi or ne choda tha Source : Akbar ak hindu k vaha uska Janam huaa tha us samay humayu yudhdh harne k karan underground the or usi time Akbar ki mummy ni kisi k sath maza le liya or unfortunately bachcha paida ho Gaya vo Akbar tha
See the thing is, he’s a king….so he was definitely powerful for the matter then even till 21st century, people label him as ‘Akbar the Great’. The thing you said that secularism was his tactics to get a good image, that’s true and it worked for him. That’s why people praise him even till date. That means, he’s definitely a great leader in terms of the fact that he could control the thoughts of his subject and manage such a huge kingdom all by himself. That being said, I obviously know that he was a cruel leader, that he have killed millions of Hindus and other innocent people. But then, no one said he was a good person at heart, people only said he was a good leader. What I believe that means is, He could have a powerful impact on his kingdom, that’s why he was a good leader. But it never meant that he was a good person, he definitely wasn’t! Also I think, whenever one becomes a king, you have to fight a battle to win the land, so obviously any king will have to kill innocent people to win the land. Not ignoring the fact that he blatantly killed many women and children, who could have been spared. Also the thing about marriage to Jodha, if you watch the serial, it was very clearly shown that Akbar had trapped her brothers, it was never said that their marriage was a love marriage. Also it was shown that he destroyed Mandirs and other Hindu places. So I think, that serial showed apt info about Akbar. And my belief about him was, “A great leader , with immense power, who only knew how to expand his kingdom and have a control on his subjects, but didn’t really Care about the people emotionally”
I am preparing for rpsc and read rajasthan history in detail...and one thing that I want to tell you is that...Akbar never fought one on one against Maharana ji because his guru chishti predicted that if he ever go in front of maharana ji he will be dead...so he made a rajput named "Man singh" commander of his troops with the thinking "dono me se koi bhi jeete marenge to hindu hi".. and one more thing he never won a single bttle against maharana ji . the story of maharana ji losse against akbar and then lived in forest eating chapati of grass is all a lie spread to defame him....
bhai tu rpsc ki preparation chhod de... tujhse na ho payega... agr tu aise hi logic dega to... Hindu muslim ki ladai nahi thi wo... thik hai... us samay ek raja dusre se lad raha tha... apne wyapar me fayade ke liye... mewar ki location bahut hi mahatvapoorn thi... isliye akbar use apne adhin karna chahta tha... Hindu muslim na karo...
@@IndianHumanBeing Ab koi sach bhi n bole. Where did he said it was hindu vs muslim even though it was. So keep ur faltu ka Gyan to urself. No wonder people like u also say Kashmir genocide, moplah genocide, direct action day was not hindu vs muslim wo to bas mulsim jihad celebrate kar rahe the.
@@atifrahman1579 Ye sab history book me hi hai. Jihadiyon ki likhi Hui jhooti history book me nahi hai iska matlab ye thodi kisi book me nahi hai. And they bring the evidences from the testaments of these jihadi kings. Jinhone apne kaale karnaame khud likhe hai coz killing kafirs was and is a kind of achievement for these demons. Kafirs are worst of all creatures wali soch rakhne Wale jo jihad ki apna farz mante hai wo sant to honge nahi. U are also a converted dhimi who ancestors were forcefully got converted and how sadning now u are taking sides of those malichaas.
Wrong! King Hemu was defeated by master mind Bairam Khan. Akbar was hidden away in a safe place, Hemu almost won that battle but unfortunate. When he was captured Akbar refused to behead him, then it was Bairam Khan you took his sword and did the job.
Maturity is when you know thqt you are not mature enough to understand islam ....Tanatani bhai Jao cow ka urine peene ka tmhra time ho gya hoga aur hm jaate hai beef khane
@@Thesufiiijainworld Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush. Quran (9:14) "Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people." Quran (9:29 ) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued." Quran (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah. Quran (3:56) - "As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help." Quran (8:12) - "(Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels... "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them" Quran (8:39 ) - "And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion is all for Allah" Quran (9:123) - "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness." Quran (47:3-4) - "Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord... So, when you meet those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them. Quran (48:29)- "Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves" Sahih Bukhari (52:177) - Allah's Apostle said, "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.",
@@Thesufiiijainworld maturity is when you realise that only prophet Muhammad existed other are imaginary character made by the Israeli tribe then the Jesus never existed but only prophet Muhammad existed not adam and eve ever existed and flat earth is common in the the 3 religion the non helicentric earth is common in both 3 religion
@@Thesufiiijainworld out of 3 abharamic faith the Judaism can only be followed by the native jews and their descendants while Jews were persecuted because of killing and imaginary character Jesus femor centuries and crusaders for pagans or heathens for centuries yet they all survived same as jihad for kafirs both Christianity and Islam is a curse to humanity
Awesome representation ❤ Tge way she narrated n the slides came one after other along with the background music is so thrilling. The Beginning oart is the best, it got me full historical vibes 🤌🏻🫂
I was expecting some evidence from these 'great historians' and a histroical analysis in the perspective of that time and space. But maybe evidence is not needed for this 'new history'.
Read all of Akbar's atrocities done in a single war in Fatehnama-i-Chittor. This is a text written. By Akbar's own historian Abul Fazl. Plus Bayaduni another historian from Akbar's court also writes about Akbar forcing a nobleman to divorce his wife so Akabr could marry her because she was beautiful. Akbar did end up marrying the beautiful wife of Abdul Wasi. So Akbar didn't spare even married muslim women.
@@A60ableRead fatehnama-i-chittor To get the idea of his atrocities. First read this book Then Find for other references as well. It's available on Internet as well. It is writing by by Abul Fazl ( one of the navratna of Akbar's court ).
Yes, Akbar was an able, efficient and tolerant ruler. 1) All the crimes he did as a 13 year old, were done in his name as the emperor, on the orders of Bairam Khan and other Mughal nobles, in keeping with their central Asian and Arab practices, which were barbaric. Then, it was their way of having "their" way or the highway. 2) His crimes in Chittorgarh were barbaric but after a prolonged war, an ancestry branching from brutal Mongols and Turks, India's amazing wealth, and unbridled ambition to rule, must have propelled him to kill all the 30,000 Hindus, descecrateHindu temples (understand, there was nothing called securalism then; for semi literate Turks and Uzbeks, we were just Khafirs. They were morons and we were weak.) 3) Marrying women or taking them as sex slaves is again a heinous crime in today's terms but a standard practice among uncivilised people. Having said so, marrying off women to the "enemy" was a standard practice everywhere, even in India. Seleucus, the Greek governor of Persia, gave one of his daughters, Berenice (known in Pali as Suvarnnaksi) in marriage to Chandragupta (founder of Mauryan dynasty). Also, harem does not mean where women meant for sex/procreation are kept. It is the female quarters of Islamic societies, since Islam forbids intermingling of sexes. Any, more later. Please mention all your sources, esp if there are any Rajput, Persian, any other source available for a new perspective on Akbar.
it is a very good effort that you are exposing violent kings about whom we were taught wrong... I'll also look forward to you making videos about ashoka the great killing his 99 brothers, Rajendra chola's harem, Destruction of budhhist monestaries by indian kings, destruction saanchi stupa by pushyamitra, Marathas destruction of temples in West Bengal if kings are to be exposed let these be in you list as well... 😊
Ashoka killing exactly 99 imaginary brothers is a blatant lie 🤣 Also maratha attack on Bengal is also a lie already many people made video about the same topic and even Bengali people confirm the same, and talking about other Indian kings and their brutality, it was nothing in comparison to radical invaders, also brutality shown by radical invaders was based on religious hatred against Hindu population.
Human Mind - Find bad sides of a Good person . Find good sides of a bad person . 😅 For me , Akbar , Ashoka, Samudragupta all are great because they have shown their might . A 13 year old boy establish a lost Mughal Empire . A king is expected to fight in war kill the enemies whether hindu or muslims . Ashoks killed jains in kalinga . Samudragupta killed a lot of Hindus that why he is called as Napolean of India . But no one points out their rule just because they are Hindu kings . they call gupta age as golden age but do they know that Sati pratha or burning women alive and untouchability started from Guptas ? Imagine a society a woman is alive till his husband but not vice versa .
for A knowledge of sense the map shown at 2:28 sec is wrong because the state Mewar and a part of Marwar of Rajputana was never captured by any of the Mughal or muslim king in the entire HISTORY. Akbar never married a RAJPUT princess as he was tricked by a Rajput Emperor by getting one of his Farsi maid's daughter married with akbar later she was portrayed as so called Jodha, who never existed. None of the Rajput princess ever married Akbar So stop using false information and recalibrate your research team. These big mistakes are not expected from BigBrainco. KINDLY CORRECT YOUR DATA.
It was an eye opening video! I thought that Akbar is a sweet and innocent king because of the animated shows Akbar and Birbal, the story books etc.... thank you for this .❤
All kings were power hungry genocidal oppressive wealth accumulating narcissists, including Muslim nawabs and nizams AND HINDU WARRIORS AND KINGS. Stop being a stupid naive sanatani sheep.
Our history books also white-washed the violent warrior king Krishna, who also gave women as sex slaves/commodities: Mahabharata 4.72: "And Krishna gave unto each of the illustrious sons of Pandu numerous female slaves, and gems and robes." Krishna’s father, Vasudeva, also had over a thousand concubines. Mahabharata 14.7: "The Brahmanas and Kshatriyas, and Vaisyas, and wealthy Sudras, set out, keeping before them the 16,000 women that had formed Vasudeva’s harem, and Vajra, the grandson of the intelligent Krishna." What about white-washing Rama's father Dasharath, who also had many concubines? Here, in the passage where Dashrath organized the carnist, violent horse killing, Ashvamedha Yajna, Valmiki's Ramayan states in the Bala Kanda 1.14.35: "Thus, the officiating priests of the ritual, namely hota, adhwaryu and udgaata have received in their hand the Crowned Queen, the neglected wife, and a concubine of the king, next as a symbolic donation in the ritual by the performer, the king." Hindu scriptures normalize sex slavery by Hindu kings. Natya Shastra 34.26-29: "I shall now describe the classes and function of women who live in the harem and have dealings with the king. They are the chief queen (maha-devi), other queens (devi), his high born wives (sramini), ordinary wives (sthayini), concubines (bhogini) craft women (silpakarini), acresses (natakiya), dancers (nartaki), maids in constant attenance (ancarika), maids of special work (paricarka), maids in constant movement (sancarika), maids for running errands (presana-carika), Mahattaris (matron), old dames (sthavira). Ayuktikas and (overseer), Pratiharis (usher), maidens (kumari)." Natya Shastra 34.40: "Concubines (bhogini) to a king are known as well-behaved, gentle [in manners], not very hanghty, and they are indifferent [to rivals], modest, affectionate but not held in high honor." Similarly, the Narada Purana mentions in 35.43: "A son born of a virgin girl is called ‘Kanina’, and that born of pregnant before marriage is called ‘Sahodhaka’. One purchased by price is called ‘Krita’, ‘Punarbhava’ is two-fold." Manu also wrote on sex slaves ... Manu Smriti 8.415: "A captive of war, a slave for maintenance, the son of a female slave, one purchased for money, a slave obtained as a present, a hereditary one, and one condemned to slavery for any offence, these are the seven kinds of slave."
And what made you think that This is correct information. This is all fake and made lies. Refer to authentic original resources and you will know this video is all lie. Maybe to get views or maybe a political propaganda.
Its no big deal about king having thousand wifes... Its all about money n power ...even today politicans n businessmens have many gfs...only thing is they keep one or two wife officially ,but at night they have many call girl services.
Please make a video about Ashvamedha , people have a lot of misconceptions about it. A certain community is trying to defame hinduism by using that fake theory of theirs .
Whats app se baahar nikal kar kabhi sahih history bhi padh lo. Shivaji ke purkhe Adilshahi ke naukar the. Shivaji ke 300 saal baad tum kuchh bhi gapod banaa lo jabki sach yeh hai ki Mughals se dushmani rakhne waale musalmaanon ne hi Shivaji ko aage badhaaya tha. Daulat Khan, Shidi Ibrahim aur unke jaise tamaam muslim sardar, Shivaji ke saath the aur yeh koi Dharm ki ladaayi nahin thi.
@@M0stAnguish Main Krishna hun jiski 16108 patniyan thi aur jo golok mein hazaaron gopiyon ke ghaaghare uthaata tha. Main Brahma hun jisne apni beti Saraswati ka balaatkaar kiya. Main Vishnu hun jisne Vrinda ka balaatkaar kiya. Main Shiv hun jisne Mohini roopi Vishnu ka balaatkaar kar Ayappa ko janma. Aur main woh Shiv hun jisne apne hi pote Aardi ka guda maithun kar kar ke uski hatya kar di.Tu 10 patniyon ki baat karta hai. Abhi ke liye itna hi, baaqi tere agle comment ke liye. Jaan le, main kul se shuddh Brahman hun. Tu mujhse zyaada nahin jaanta.
@@siddharthdas9974 O, goo khaane aur moot peene waale bhagwa balaatkaari Lindu, jaanwar ke goo khaane aur uska moot peene ko dharm samajhne waale, Lu*d aur Cho*t ki pooja karne waale, rail ki patriyon par baith kar hagne waale, tu dega history ka certificate. Tere to naam mein hi Das hai, Baap to tera main hun beta, Main kul se Brahman hun. Jaa pehle jaakar, paani aur moot mein farq seekh phir aana gyaan pelne.
Akbar was not the reason for Chittorgarh jauhar , khilji was. Just a humble correction🤍 And the video was really very well narrated And the visuals were really amazing good job to the team 👏🏻👏🏻
Well, firstly this profound sentence of "Akbar the Great" should be radicalized completely. He wasn't great by the loose and liberal meaning of the word. Secondly, Akbar was cruel and it should be notified. Thanks to the team of @Raaz for keeping the authentic sources in front of the viewers.
Bhai badshah girls say rape kertay hein lakhoun girls say ap ko kion samajh nahi ati india aur Pakistan should unity and provide safety their women's and learn lessons from the history
So then there is no difference Ashoka and Akbar. Ashoka also massacred thousands in Kalinga and then suddenly turned into a preacher. The reality is politics is all about personal stuff nobody cares about anyone, everything is a drama. In wars you have to kill people, you have to use swords.
Note: All the facts that have been discussed in the video have been well researched by our content team.
Please refer to the research document here: bitly.ws/KpEB
Remove this line in video Shri maharana pratap never lost battel against akabr please
You bluddy ..Rana Pratap ji is always a Man of Honour didn't liked that you took Great men's Man with This Bullshit Millipede named as Akbar
@@mustafizurrahaman7776jali kya tere 😂😂
Aapki team quora aur Wikipedia se research kar rhi hai. kesa fuddu team bana rhe ho aaplog yaar?😅
Akbar the great ❌
Akbar the r@ndi ✅✅
Akbar never defeated shri maharana pratap please re correct
Exactly!🙄
Yep..
Exactly 💯
Akbar kabhi jeeta nhi aur Maharana Pratap kabhi hare nhi
🚩🚩🙏🙏
Akbar ki senapati ko ghora samet Kat Diya tha 80 kilo ki talwar see , maharana Pratap ji ki jay ❤❤❤
Akbar never fought a single battle on field, and Maharana Pratap never lost a war against him It's only when Maharana died of an infection he waged a war against Mewar.
@@mahathirmohammed4405 When u jihadis don't even exist we had Ashoka and Chandragupta maurya as our ancestors and kautilya like pm lol!!
@@mahathirmohammed4405 librandu spotted
@@mahathirmohammed4405 Taliban bula rha tereko Jana apne ghar
@@mahathirmohammed4405 Ohh udta teer G me lene aa gye aap....Lagta hai 72 Hooro ke pass jldi jana hai😶🌫
@@mahathirmohammed4405akbar's jhaat spotted
Imagine some people celebrating a ruler just because he is less Barbaric than his lineage . This itself tells us how low the bar is being set.
its basically liking some corrupt politician as he only stole 5000 crores less than the most corrupt politician.
That's the fault of 70 years ruling congress . When I was studying all we read about is akbar and babar and mughal and there was literally so small paras or jsut 2 lines about indian fighters like maharana pratap, shivaji , rani lakshmi bai
@@_shreya_9795true...akbar ke bare me sab jante but maharana pratap ,shivaji or bhi jo fighters the...unke bare koi nhi janta
I mean yeah, He is wrong but there are always levels to it.
One who kills a thousand and one who kills a couple are both wrong, But on different levels.
@@_shreya_9795 kon lutera shivaji ?
Akbar was not at all great. He was a womaniser and was very shrude and cruel. He had killed lakhs of innocent people in today's Rajasthan.
Real history but Maharana never lost any battle 🦅
You mean whatever they said become real history vo bol Rahi hai kha jata hai ho sakta hai ye nahi ki real history hai
@@zaki2309bruh are u dumb? Maharana Pratap never lost to akbar ,go and get ur facts right thoda research karle before putting fake allegations
@@zaki2309 whenever invasions done its meant to destroy country's culture and loot its fortune .... and Mughals were the invaders ... so there"s 90% chances what she said is truth ..... and mughals were known to write history they pleases with....... if mughals were really that good as written in schools history textbook then they never would invade india in first place ........i dont know why u people supports such people just cause they belongs to your culture... can't you distinguish between right and wrong???? ....... does your culture really preach the idea of destroying others culture???
Mut pine wala spotted😂
@@zaki2309chal na chutiye 🔱
In NCERT we read about the "good" things Mughals did. Which is a big fat lie.
I don't know why NCERT doesn't teach us about The great Maharana Pratap, who sacrificed his life for independence, and the great Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj.
I usually discuss the facts I learn from RAAZ with my history teacher and he says that the facts are true but we all are forced to read the lie that Muslim historians wrote.
I hope one day they'll make a change in the textbooks, and let the other generation know the truth.
It's painful when I hear that students know whose son was Akbar and whose father was Babur, but they don't know anything about the real great warriors and kings of the history.
I have a dream of becoming the pm of India a true democratic one if i ever achieve that i will change history literally
I don't know why NCERT don't teach us about bullshitting of brahmins 😂😂
It's okay, our syllabus only cover the basic points, if you are truly interested, gotta learn a few things by yourself.
We were taught french in school, still weren't capable of holding single good conversations, learnt it by ourselves and doing a fairly good job.
It's time we move on from blaming our sylllabus and education system.
yea ikrr ncert is just making us believe lies
this is just propaganda making in believe in 'secularism' trash
Akbar never won maharana never lose ❤
Abe history ka pata bhi hai kuch
@@addictedmems2.012tuje nahi pata kuch
@@addictedmems2.012 bhai ek baar search karle clear ho jayega
@@addictedmems2.012terko pata hai?
Maharana pratap pahadiyo mai chup jata tha 😂😂
So lucky as to live in as an Hindhu in this century. Thank God.
U...The only Hindu survived from me... I'll get back to you😢😢😢
@@pakarmlover5133 ha ha get back to him lekin pehle puncture toh nikal lo
@@pakarmlover5133
Aata(wheat) hai?
Our history books still preach "Akbar the great"
This video is eye opening
AND NO ONE IS EVEN CLEARLY EXPLAINING THE WHOLE STORY TOO. JUST TEACHING US TO COMPLETE THE SYLLABUS AUR HUM BENSTOKES RATTA MAARE JAA RAHE HAI TAAKI YEH BAKWAAS PADH KE MARKS MIL JAYE. THU HAI AISE CHAPTERS PAR BE
Yes they should! Because he was great as a ShehenShahhh
@FUCKukraine69 even Jodha named women never existed a made up story by Mughal writer and poets and still mak a movie on them rather they forgets baapa rawal 35 muslim arab wives and 450 years of slavery of Uzbekistan and Afghanistan,Iran and Iraq by great Hindu kings lalitaditya muktapida and bappa rawal ji and etc Kashmir became his capital
Can anyone tell me what's the meaning of Geneu ?
@@noise7150 Akbar was not a kind ruler. He was a vicious and a ruthless ruler whose aim was to expand the boundaries of his empire. Although he adopted din i ilahi principle and imposed jaziya. His main motive towards these principles was to make rajputs happy because he knew that without the support of rajputs and hindus he cannot run his empire in india 🤣🤣🤣🤣cry now
Hindu kings were not United ,that's the reason Mughals ruled Bharat. Till now Hindus have not learned from its mistakes. Still fighting with each other
Every parent should teach our history to their children's.. then everything will change coz no one knows about our history..
Our history is full of atrocities against women's and sudras .....they had suffered too much until islam arrived in india....akbar even tried to stop sati system and child marriage
You can observe it even today!
How can you unite when you worship a monkey, an elephant, cows, nude women and other humans and their private parts? - Worship the Creator ☝️ (Ooperwala ☝️, sab deknewala, sab sunnewaala, sab jaanewaala) NOT the creations!
You are absolutely Right brother
In Short. Rajasthan history books will now say that Maharana Pratap defeated Akbar during Battle of Haldighati. If Akbar had won, why he attack Rajputs six times, education minister questioned. Until now, students were taught that the battle ended inconclusively.
Akbar won decisively,even Portuguese ambassador's historians reported that Pratap ran away from the Battle of Haldighati when he saw his army getting destroyed. He was injured and barely managed to flee. Meanwhile after the battle,Akbar commissioned more campaigns to conquer mewar once Pratap ran away😂this is coming from even non-indians. The whole world laughs at Maharunner Pratap
Maharana Pratap hi haldighaati jeete the to isse tumko kya Mila ?Haldighati ke yudhh me Maharana Pratap ka sabse vishvasniye Hakim Soor Khan tha aur Is yudhh me Akbar maidan me tha hi nahi uske lie uske Pradhan senapati Raja Man Singh kamaan sambhal rahe the.
@@BarlasofIndus whi to whatsapp university ko kon smjhaye
One video for daku shivaji and bagora pratap 😂
@@atifrahman1579akbar ki 301 vi biwi ka bacha, bhenchod
हमारी पूर्वजों ने जो कुछ हमे दिया है उसका हमेशा आभारी रहूंगा 🙏🏻 हमे हिन्दु बनाये रखने के लिए हमारी हिफाजत के लिए इन्होंनो बहुत दुख झेला है 😢😢 हमारी माता भी वीरांगना थी आपके जौहर पे हमे गर्व है 😭😭🙏🏻🙏🏻
Urgent changes required in NCERT books,so that future generations can learn truth about Akbar and his cruelty.
Chal saale jab koi cruelty Hui hi nhi to kaun sa urgent change pagal hai kya dimaag se
Tum logo ki problem pata hai kya hai ki tum logo se kisi ki aachai nhi suni jaati
Tum logo ki problem pata hai kya hai ki tum logo se kisi ki aachai nhi suni jaati Maharana Pratap is great no one denied this Akbar at his place was also great respect great man and don't spread hate just because ki wo ek Mughal hai
Didi tumhari problem hai ki tumhe hazam nhi ho rha ki Mughal hone ke bawazood Aaj use itni izzat kyu mil rhi hai bas or koi content na ho to kuch bhi non sense bana do
Bhaiya aapko kyo problem ho rahi hai. Sabko apni baat bolne ka haq hai.
Exactly….sirf Akbar ko hi great kyo bola gaya ? Ye sab facts koi pehli baar samne nahi aa rahe … sabhi ko pata he Akbar ne mandir jalaye , shastra jalaye , jabarzasti shadiyan ki … lekin hamare historians ne use Great kaha aur kahalawaya .. kyo kyonki unhe aisi government se orders the jise Muslim votes chahiye the … fact ye he😊
@@richi915 what is your problem he is saying the reality
One of the best unbiased, true to the facts video on internet on this topic with epic graphics and beautiful narration!❤
I went that "Jawalamukhi Mata temple " and that jawala is still there and that chatra which was given by Akbar was also there in khandit form . That's power of Devi ma . Which makes our belief more powerful and strong in sanatan dharma .
Jai Mata di ♥️
Well commented viewpoint presented by you. Hope that others don't miss this
@@harshit.stav1😂 better have some knowledge about whole Dharma things otherwise don't comment silly thing
@@harshit.stav1true 💯💯💯
@@Khushie_singhwhat knowledge😂😂😂
@@minahilsafdar1092
Liberandu/Pappupremi🤡 and Peaceful RIP 💯🤲🏻
Brothers, can anyone tell where these pieces of information are derived from?I also want to read and know the truth.
Just don't read congress NCERT.
Reference of resources is pinned in comment section
whatsapp university
I always looked at akbar as sweet decent king because of NCERT textbooks, movies, that animated show akbar birbal. This is an eye opener. Thank you.
Yea same
All lies bros
No that's not the truth
@@alishastar7891 haa ab clear hogya
All thanks to our then govt who had no self respect & wer in favour of portraying Nehru & these Moghul kings as the heroes
All Thanks to their dirty mindset India couldn’t progress for so many years
Very extensively researched video! Loved it!
Half researched to be precise
@@noise7150truth is bitter
Kindly note.. Akbar (So called Great) attacked Mewar Six times.. and was defeated every time by Great Maharana Pratap..!!
😂😂😂
What the joke😂
@@jamilawafa7251fact hi hai tum delusional ho
The Battle of Haldighati was a battle fought on 18 June 1576 between cavalry and archers supporting the Rana of Mewar, Maharana Pratap; and the Mughal emperor Akbar's forces, led by Man Singh I of Amber. Where Akbar defeated Rana Pratap.
The Battle of Haldighati was a battle fought on 18 June 1576 between cavalry and archers supporting the Rana of Mewar, Maharana Pratap; and the Mughal emperor Akbar's forces, led by Man Singh I of Amber. Where Akbar defeated Rana Pratap.
Akbar is not born on 25 oct he is born in 15 oct. Please correct it. Don't mislead wrong information and so many other things are also wrong
When I was younger, I liked the film 'Jodha Akbar' a lot... Now, gradually that I have become aware of such matters, not only that I don't like it anymore but also I feel like how can they romanticize such a relationship... It was anything but a romantic relationship... 😑
Frr I also thought Akbar was great
But after seeing this video
I don't even like Akbar anymore
I always I wished I was born in Akbar's era but
Not anymore i would be dead meat if i was born in his era
Being pretty in Akbar's era seems horrible too
If you're pretty you would have to go to his Haram ( forcefully)
If i was born ugly in his era i would still be dead cause like she said they would also kill woman and childs
I'm glad that ik about his history rn
@@Mehu394 then just be akbar 💀(jk)
Becoz its karachiwood.... For them Brahman balatkari hota h, thakur atyachaari , baniya chor or Abdul oppressed deshbhakt by the majority...
I am not in favour of Akbar but please check the fact that what she said is true or not
@@fadyb_Polo Even if what is stated in the video is not 100% true, one thing is for sure that he was a very harsh and barbaric being at that time...
This is an eye opener!! Didn't know these facts about akbar. Was he really great? What sort of history are we even learning? Thank god at least our native people have written about Ch. Shivaji Maharaj and Maharana Pratap so that we know our real history and stories of our real heroes. Jai bhavani Jai Shivray 🙏🙏
he would not have sleep at night maharana pratab grand dautger i guss she went in thos women room wear womens would be shetook swoed and atteck akbar then akber beggged for life
Funnily history call them great who brought nothing but destruction. For example Alexander the great, Ashoka the Great, the great Timur, Napoleon the great and Genghis Khan.
Rulers who ruled to preserve cultural heritage and peacefully were never accounted as great. They were called calm, weak or peace loving.
Sources please and the historian .And one thing dont learn history specially form youtubers while BJP IT Cell is on full swing
@@vivekpatalay ksne btaya? Modi je ne? Ya Akbar aya tha khwab men btane?
@@Kai_28 ready history 🤣🤣🤣 I think u love Mughal
One thing Maha Rana Pratap never lost any battle and Fatehpur Sikri with Selim Chisti Dargah and Buland Darwaja was established to celebrate the victory over Gujrat.....
Actually…. Ish me kafi kuch galat bataya Gaya hai
Thank you sister.. explained very well. stay well May your channel continue to grow, and I look forward to seeing more videos like this.
It is good to see that young generation is coming forward to expose the atrocities of Mughals, exposing the so called secular history, colonial mindset.Really,it is a new tide of regeneration, rewrite and to know our culture, history
But the sad thing is that
Facts can't be hidden AKBAR was the great
@@CentristGovtthe was not great but fake
@@abhayraichand1863 bru same ASHOKA was great
@@CentristGovtt yes he was but he was a Sanatani when being an emperor. In Sanatan dharm the warrior ideology exist by default kshatriya
@@CentristGovtt later he accepted Buddhism and people became incompetent to fight. Muslims killed Buddhist who cheated hindus and helped them against hindus as for Muslims only muslims are human
OUR REAL HERO - SRI MAHARANA PRATAP JI AND SRI CHHATRAPATI SHIVAJI MAHARAJ🚩📿🙏🕉
PHIR BRAHMNO N ISE APNA BRAHMAN BAI KYON BNAYA OR ALAH UPNISHED B LIKHA MUGHLO KO KHUSH KRNE KELIYE .RANA SANGHA N H BARBAR KO BULAYA THA INDIA M
advanchudh😂
Hmare sikh guruo ko na bhule ❤
@@LostHopes-te2hh feker not ind toh kya even canada main nahi bhole hai hone
correction - Akbar couldnt defeat Maharana , instead he could never capture Maharana. That was a partial victory..
Because that coward ran away from battle. You can’t call him a winner
@@casualuser2317 atleast he had that much courage to enter into the battle field although he knew he had few soldiers (20,000) and fight against 80,000 AFGHANI soldiers. Where akbar was so afraid of Maharana Pratap that he refused to fought the battle. With only 20,000 Mewari he was capable enough to kill that Man Singh. And if u talk about his running, then brother it was needed as he was one of the last hope for all the BHARATIYA, Indian women and children for their safety as all the invaders(afghani eg akbar) were filled with lust of women. So, Maharana Pratap never lost any battle and akbar never fought. For Indians Maharana was, is and will always the winner bcz he fought for your and my motherland.
@@casualuser2317 Terrorist Spotted
@@ManviBharadwaj05 you don’t understand the rules of war and battle
There’s only one rule- you either win or lose. And Maharana pratap lost and therefore ran away no matter what excuses are followed. It’s an inevitable fact one must accept
@@praisethelord5379 prove it
Since when tanatanis started claiming Christian chanting??
What is the source of this information
WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF YOUR COMMENT
Even today we have not full knowledge about the brutal reign of Mughals,and due to our useless education system and great politicians,it is still hard to say that truth will be revealed 😔😔
That ehy i love people like you who use logic and brain
What's there more to know about muslim rulers ? As always it will be cruelty and violence beyond words. Even today these men can't do away with violence as we witness at this age and time.
*ISLAM nafrat jhooth loot dhokha havas halala balatkar atank narsanhar ka mazhab hai.*
*G0d exists but Arabic Shaitan ALLAH Dalla IS FAKE creation and fake ID of PIGamber MuhaMAD atanki balatkari bachi-chod gunda daku.*
True, when history will be made in Nagpur and it will be copied and pasted in WhatsApp, what will happen, but do history and the world does not believe in will😂😂🙏
Ya, just like our religious textbooks white-washed the violent warrior king Krishna, who also treated and bartered women as sex slaves/commodities:
Mahabharata 4.72: "And Krishna gave unto each of the illustrious sons of Pandu numerous female slaves, and gems and robes."
Krishna’s father Vasudeva also had a over a thousand concubines.
Mahabharata 14.7: "The Brahmanas and Kshatriyas, and Vaisyas, and wealthy Sudras, set out, keeping before them the 16,000 women that had formed Vasudeva’s harem, and Vajra, the grandson of the intelligent Krishna."
5:10 Akbar Never In His Wildest Dream Defeated Maharana Pratap
Kindly fact check ✅ & Rectify it
People have to understand one thing, it's not about religion, almost all great conquerors, be it Alexander, Genghis Khan, Ashoka or Akbar, they all have a history of brutality.
It's not just exclusive to Akbar, big conquerors were raised in a certain way to execute power and be extremely brutal, so that the rest surrender.
This video could be a great conspiracy theory, but still is partly true, these emperors were called "the great" for a reason which should not be ignored.
Even mother Teresa and Gandhiji are said to have these "dark sides" that netizens love to talk about.
Exactly...
@@anupbhuzel I checked their sources of research, half of them are quora and wikipedia
@@howdidthishappen6498they were brutal, no doubt but even through brutality they were not women predators like the ones in Islam
@@clashon4846 true
Exactly what I feel. Suppose if you are a very good person and listen to people politely and follow their wishes, any stronger king would come and displace you in just a second! He has to be their king, not slave, for that they definitely have to be strong and cruel. And no one ever preached Akbar as a holy person, he was ‘ Great’ for his administrative skills and as a king!
Great piece of information without references & D grade research ⭐⭐
go and leave in pakistan with your A grade information...
महाराणा कभी हारे नहीं , अकबर कभी जीता नहीं !😡😡😡
Bro tumare kahne se history change nahi hoga 😂
@@dzmemerbro6780 history to padni hoti hai..aur Bina pade tum jaise log AA jaten ho..koi baat nhi abh har kisi ke paas to dimaag nhi hota na
@@prodyutguha6779 tere andar bahut dimag hai bata kitne percentage tune bana liye the apne 10th and 12th boards mein (honestly) agar itna bol rahe ho to. Baat ye hai na ki galat tum bhi ho aur wo bhi but fark sirf itna hai ki tum log har cheez ki negative sides lete ho kabhi socha akbar ne jodha bai ko as a wife rakkha but according to Islam no one can marry anyone with different religion. Sirf itna hi nhi balki use apni baaki patniyon se zyada respect aur care di. Akbar aur Maharana pratap bahut hi achche rulers the aur unke era mein dono muslims aur hindu bhai bhai banke rehte the. Akbar to bahut choti age mein raja ban gaya tha due to death of humayun. Don't you have the courage to encourage him instead of making fun and pointing out the negative side of every thing. Muslims are not bad , the mind is that thing which is controlled by some uneducated illitrate foolish personalities to divert the mind of charming ones. Well no offence, Respect both of them .
Jai Hind
Peace out
@@masluckyt6472ha Kiya tha sadi akwar ke pass Sara raj tha or Rajput or Muslim ek hote he farq bus itna he ki Rajput Hindu he or Muslim Rajput Alag he
@@prodyutguha6779 ab gobar kane wale hame gayan de rahe hai kya din aagyaa
Akbar, the r@ndi. ❤️
I m form kangra district of Himachal here is a temple jwalaji as she told in the video where Akbar tried to harm jawala mata but he could not so he gifted sone ki chattri here but mata refused to accept it as the metal changed now ....jai jwala mata....🙏❤️
The link which you provided for research documents is not working.
AKBAR WASN'T ABLE TO DEFEAT MAHARANA PRATAP. ''AKBAR KABHI JITA NHI AUR MAHARANA KABHI HAARE NHI.'''JAI MAHARANA PRATAP.
Ye to sabko pta hai kon jeeta tha 😂
My grandfather's brother who is now no more has written a book called Indians resistance to early muslim invaders in which it is clearly mentioned that what we used to study in schools or even colleges was just portrayed in a way that all the mughals were like Gods and they never showed the dark side of it.
Name of the book
@@rudramahadev22 It's "Indian resistance to early muslim invaders"
Your grandfather was muslim phobic 😂😃😅 as most of the mughals did not follow islam they were muslims 4 name sake only.
why don't you now publish it and make it possible to be available that thing for us.
It is already published
Akbar adulterated Hindu scriptures in the name of din -e -Ilahi. All Mughals were cruel. Not only aurangzeb ( ofcourse he was the most cruelest of all that's why history can't hide it)
History is written by winners .
Ashoka was cruel also no matter what how hard he tried to hide Kalinga cruelty,
We had a history book in secondary school, it wasn't ncert as I studied in the cisce board, it had a line quoted, "Akbar was one of the best rulers India has ever seen."
same here
@@sourajitdey3558is she lying? What her sources. If akbar was really bad why didn't we learn his dark side.
Is she Lying?
@@hdhnbggh8312 because he burnt and killed all people who said against him
@@JDM-mix-phonk source book??
We were always told about the goodness of Mughals in school and because of which we never know the reality. Buy now I'm glad that I never took my school text book or so called NCERT history book seriously.
Maulana Abul Kalam Azad was ASSIGNED task by congress to write the distorted school syllabus
@@GSds657Bhenchod tho yeh tha voh chodu bhagat...indian history majak hai kya...hum students' ko appeal krni chahiye government se to rewrite our history...
read the old ncerts
they're quite unbiased and make you aware about the cruelty of mughals
@@kavitameghani7932 But fact is fact "Mughals were cruel" 💯. Isn't it??
So why even in this 21st century muslims portray them as hero??
Most of the times I have seen muslims get irked and then come to defend these mughals. Why so?? 😑
Why muslims have sympathy for such tyrants/barbarians??
Because they converted kafirs to islam or what??
Really happy to see you addressed jawalamukhi incident in the video ,my hometown is himachal ,jawala ji & i never see anyone addressing this incident in any other video,good effort ,great video❤
I really love Himachal a lot ♥️
@Whyheena I'm also from Jawala ji
@@somyavaidwan9999 ❤️❤️
True. ...we visit it often ...jai mata di
@@SD-ft1pe jai mata di❤️
Link of source given in the comment section is not working....
No one can resist this - mughal won because of rajasthan rajput king's kindness..nd i m rajasthani nd proud that our motherland gave us these great rajput kings..bt same time i feel bad for their over kindness..agr wo shivaji jaise hote to mughlo ki haisiyat whi lootero wali hi rh jati ✌️✌️
First things first It’s Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj
And I don’t think Rajputs were defeated due to the kindness and all
Actually Akbar bribed many Rajput rajas and subehdars to turn up against Maharana Pratap amongst which was RAJA MAN SINGH l.
And for the victory in haldi ghati war RAJA MAN SINGH was one of the NAVRATNAS of Akbar .
Let's talk about current generation scenario rajput girls of North India are having muslim bf n declares in Instagram .
Hindus never learnt from their history n bound to be vanish for their secularism .
@@nickpartha8643 yupp this is ridiculous 😑😑why girls trust them after see the dangerous incident from their own eyes 🙄🙄bevkoof aurtein 😑or mjhe sbse jyada gussa Mohandas karamchand Gandhi pe aata h..bhudha khud to ahinsa ahinsa krke marr gya or hinduo k hath m tokra de gya ahinsa ka 😑mjhe lgta h jroort se jyada ahinsaa napusankta ki nishani hoti h 🙄
@@adityabairagi3738 don't teach me that it's chatrapati shivaji maharaj..i respect him..even I think more then u..love nd respect both are saparate things..some people say - Ganesha..some say shree Ganesha..some - ganeshji..that doesn't mean that only those who say "shree Ganesh ji Maharaj" respect Ganesh ji..😑😑be mature..even in villages we told our father's name..by name if some old person ask..bt in cities we say shree ------ ji.. 😒😒nd second.. prithviraj Chauhan beat md gauri 16 times..bt every time he leave him due to kindness..nd mostly kings used to do this 😑so Mughals know that these kings can be won by heart nd emotions bt not by the war..its a fact ✌️
@@dr.nishachoudhary5135 it’s good that you respect him .. I also have huge respect for each and every Hindu king who fought for their motherland against the Mughals ……. Prithviraj Chauhan defeated md Gauri 16 times I agree ….. but does that chance the fact that the mighty Rajputs were not betrayed by some of their own men? Does it change the fact that if Raja man Singh didn’t fall for the offerings of the Mughals , the Rajputs could’ve easily defeated the Mughals . Marathas , Rajputs both lacked one thing that is unity …. They turned against their own motherland for what the Mughals bribed them for . If some of the Rajputs or Marathas were united and not greedy the Mughals stood no chance against them.
After hearing all the facts I realised one thing. Sati pratha that sanatani used to do with the widow wife because after the husband died due to any reason the wife became unprotected and during mughal emperor mughals were the predators for the women who doesn't jave husbands. So it's preferable to die with the dead husband rather suffer being in a haram. Like rajputana women used to do johar. Similar thing
I used to think this too but it wasn't the case it was started before Mughal invasion in small masses then after the invasion it became more prominent in society 😅. We should accept that sati was the evil of society. Second is jauhar it wad done by queen and the wives of other soldiers in order to protect their dignity after their husbands martyred
Sati pratha was a conspiracy to grab property of deceased person by society.
Sati pratha was existing long before Sultani and Mughal period. The widow women mostly misused by the male members of their own family. Besides, to have the possession over their husband ' s property it was introduced. During ancient period it was not there. Even no Hindu scripture does encourage the sati pratha.
Thanks and regards.
she doesn't know anything about sati pratha. that was jauhar not sati
Jauhar And Sati Pratha both are different 👍🏻
Akbar ke time pe agar Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Paida hote to Shahjahan, Aurangzeb ye sab paida hi nahi ho pate 😂…
💯💯 🔥
Bhai agar itny brave thy sab to mughal itni sadion tak hakumat kesa krty rhy? Aur agar hinduon ko marna hota to hindus delete na hojaty india se abtak?
Har har mahadeb🕉️
@@ntwadumela7ku Modi k aane se chuslim delete ho gye kya 😂
@@ntwadumela7 delete ho chuke...600 million converts are living in south asia
Akhbar the great❌
Akhbar the biggest MADAR*****✅
JAI CHATRAPATI SHIVAJI MAHARAJ KI JAI!!!
As a Hindu, I can never forgive what these Mughals did!
High time we Hindus realise that it's our responsibility to preserve our existence by inculcating right values in our generation. 'Twinkle Twinkle Little Stars' should be replaced with glories of Maharana Pratap, Rani Lakshmibai, Shivaji, etc. What's worse is our young generation moving away from its roots on the name of modernity and some influence of western culture. Be up with the world, embrace change but not at the cost of compromising with your traditions and roots.
May almighty lord Mahadev enlighten every lost soul! Har Har Mahadev...
🤍
Don’t forgive nobody is asking your forgiveness
@@abdullahfaruque.We hindus are asking... None of your business dirty aatankwaadi Mughal
@@abdullahfaruque.maderchodo ab tumhari aisi maa chodenge ki you’ll ask for forgiveness.
Muslim were better than so called hindu. As there is superstition and casteism in hinduism.
Who is asking for forgiveness???
Everything is okay. But you shouldn't have put Rajat Tokas on the thumbnail. He's gem of an actor and he just portrayed Jalaluddin Akbar. You should have used his paintings for thumbnail.
Who cares … it is what it is
the disclaimer is already there for u
Superb channel..
Ardent fan
Bless d whole effort🙏
What are your sources of this information???
There are many if you go to a good library or book shop.
Akbar ki mummy ko kisi or ne choda tha
Source : Akbar ak hindu k vaha uska Janam huaa tha us samay humayu yudhdh harne k karan underground the or usi time Akbar ki mummy ni kisi k sath maza le liya or unfortunately bachcha paida ho Gaya vo Akbar tha
Well narrated! Would love to see more of this! 🚀
What a well researched video 👏
Pity on this is well researched 😂😂
See the thing is, he’s a king….so he was definitely powerful for the matter then even till 21st century, people label him as ‘Akbar the Great’. The thing you said that secularism was his tactics to get a good image, that’s true and it worked for him. That’s why people praise him even till date. That means, he’s definitely a great leader in terms of the fact that he could control the thoughts of his subject and manage such a huge kingdom all by himself.
That being said, I obviously know that he was a cruel leader, that he have killed millions of Hindus and other innocent people. But then, no one said he was a good person at heart, people only said he was a good leader. What I believe that means is, He could have a powerful impact on his kingdom, that’s why he was a good leader. But it never meant that he was a good person, he definitely wasn’t! Also I think, whenever one becomes a king, you have to fight a battle to win the land, so obviously any king will have to kill innocent people to win the land. Not ignoring the fact that he blatantly killed many women and children, who could have been spared.
Also the thing about marriage to Jodha, if you watch the serial, it was very clearly shown that Akbar had trapped her brothers, it was never said that their marriage was a love marriage. Also it was shown that he destroyed Mandirs and other Hindu places. So I think, that serial showed apt info about Akbar. And my belief about him was, “A great leader , with immense power, who only knew how to expand his kingdom and have a control on his subjects, but didn’t really Care about the people emotionally”
Finally someone said ,what I wanted to read in the comment section...Thanks Buddy!!!
@manviyadav6250 thanks for reading that long comment 😭
Where did u collected the evidences and facts plz mention it??
Sach karwa hota h mohtarma
I am preparing for rpsc and read rajasthan history in detail...and one thing that I want to tell you is that...Akbar never fought one on one against Maharana ji because his guru chishti predicted that if he ever go in front of maharana ji he will be dead...so he made a rajput named "Man singh" commander of his troops with the thinking "dono me se koi bhi jeete marenge to hindu hi".. and one more thing he never won a single bttle against maharana ji . the story of maharana ji losse against akbar and then lived in forest eating chapati of grass is all a lie spread to defame him....
bhai tu rpsc ki preparation chhod de... tujhse na ho payega... agr tu aise hi logic dega to... Hindu muslim ki ladai nahi thi wo... thik hai... us samay ek raja dusre se lad raha tha... apne wyapar me fayade ke liye... mewar ki location bahut hi mahatvapoorn thi... isliye akbar use apne adhin karna chahta tha... Hindu muslim na karo...
@@IndianHumanBeing
Ab koi sach bhi n bole.
Where did he said it was hindu vs muslim even though it was.
So keep ur faltu ka Gyan to urself.
No wonder people like u also say Kashmir genocide, moplah genocide, direct action day was not hindu vs muslim wo to bas mulsim jihad celebrate kar rahe the.
I. Didn't study for rpsc but it's in ba that Akhbar used Man Singh a rajput to battle against Maharana pratap correct me if I'm wrong
History book se pdh bro whatsapp knowledge se exam clear nhi hoga
@@atifrahman1579
Ye sab history book me hi hai.
Jihadiyon ki likhi Hui jhooti history book me nahi hai iska matlab ye thodi kisi book me nahi hai.
And they bring the evidences from the testaments of these jihadi kings.
Jinhone apne kaale karnaame khud likhe hai coz killing kafirs was and is a kind of achievement for these demons.
Kafirs are worst of all creatures wali soch rakhne Wale jo jihad ki apna farz mante hai wo sant to honge nahi.
U are also a converted dhimi who ancestors were forcefully got converted and how sadning now u are taking sides of those malichaas.
Wrong! King Hemu was defeated by master mind Bairam Khan. Akbar was hidden away in a safe place, Hemu almost won that battle but unfortunate. When he was captured Akbar refused to behead him, then it was Bairam Khan you took his sword and did the job.
Exactly.
Yes the most common point she couldn't describe
Movie mein dekha kya??
Maturity is that when u know... Islam is the dushman 🔥
Maturity is when you know thqt you are not mature enough to understand islam ....Tanatani bhai
Jao cow ka urine peene ka tmhra time ho gya hoga aur hm jaate hai beef khane
@@Thesufiiijainworld Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush.
Quran (9:14) "Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people."
Quran (9:29 ) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."
Quran (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah.
Quran (3:56) - "As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help."
Quran (8:12) - "(Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels... "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them"
Quran (8:39 ) - "And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion is all for Allah"
Quran (9:123) - "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness."
Quran (47:3-4) - "Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord... So, when you meet those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them.
Quran (48:29)- "Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves"
Sahih Bukhari (52:177) - Allah's Apostle said, "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.",
@@Thesufiiijainworld maturity is when you realise that only prophet Muhammad existed other are imaginary character made by the Israeli tribe then the Jesus never existed but only prophet Muhammad existed not adam and eve ever existed and flat earth is common in the the 3 religion the non helicentric earth is common in both 3 religion
@@Thesufiiijainworld out of 3 abharamic faith the Judaism can only be followed by the native jews and their descendants while Jews were persecuted because of killing and imaginary character Jesus femor centuries and crusaders for pagans or heathens for centuries yet they all survived same as jihad for kafirs both Christianity and Islam is a curse to humanity
@@Thesufiiijainworld what colour is ur Allah?🤣did he do a face reveal yet?
One question....u often used " historical records"
Please let us know the references
Awesome representation ❤ Tge way she narrated n the slides came one after other along with the background music is so thrilling. The Beginning oart is the best, it got me full historical vibes 🤌🏻🫂
awesome buttering🤣
Great content! Keep making such videos guys 🐼🐼
Privileged to learn a new history from such great historians. It would be great to have reference to some texts.
I was expecting some evidence from these 'great historians' and a histroical analysis in the perspective of that time and space. But maybe evidence is not needed for this 'new history'.
Read all of Akbar's atrocities done in a single war in Fatehnama-i-Chittor. This is a text written. By Akbar's own historian Abul Fazl. Plus Bayaduni another historian from Akbar's court also writes about Akbar forcing a nobleman to divorce his wife so Akabr could marry her because she was beautiful. Akbar did end up marrying the beautiful wife of Abdul Wasi. So Akbar didn't spare even married muslim women.
@@A60ableRead fatehnama-i-chittor
To get the idea of his atrocities.
First read this book
Then
Find for other references as well.
It's available on Internet as well.
It is writing by by Abul Fazl ( one of the navratna of Akbar's court ).
@@A60able Read this text and return back to comment.
Yes I was provided with some valid text .
By editing your comment
@@A60able 4:48 name of text is given.
You can read it .
In this video itself you find the reference book.
If you do Research on your said contents, please provide references also.
😶 speechless... After completing school in 2014 today after 9 years I came to know the hidden truth...
Thankyou very much @RAAAZ
Keep going as such❤
@williamtheconqueror6840 it's just not about multiple marriages bro grow up 😂
I’ve never witnessed such awesome editing as this one. 😮
Before making any historic content, u must make sure from which source u are making the video.....otherwise such will spread confusion only......
One of the best narration and storytelling. How perfectly you are creating the suspense in every line. Really appreciate the good work
Very informative!! Keep making more content ❤️
Very true! this is a hidden truth that is not known by many people. that you for making us aware. looking forward to more such content!
Yes, Akbar was an able, efficient and tolerant ruler.
1) All the crimes he did as a 13 year old, were done in his name as the emperor, on the orders of Bairam Khan and other Mughal nobles, in keeping with their central Asian and Arab practices, which were barbaric. Then, it was their way of having "their" way or the highway.
2) His crimes in Chittorgarh were barbaric but after a prolonged war, an ancestry branching from brutal Mongols and Turks, India's amazing wealth, and unbridled ambition to rule, must have propelled him to kill all the 30,000 Hindus, descecrateHindu temples (understand, there was nothing called securalism then; for semi literate Turks and Uzbeks, we were just Khafirs. They were morons and we were weak.)
3) Marrying women or taking them as sex slaves is again a heinous crime in today's terms but a standard practice among uncivilised people. Having said so, marrying off women to the "enemy" was a standard practice everywhere, even in India. Seleucus, the Greek governor of Persia, gave one of his daughters, Berenice (known in Pali as Suvarnnaksi) in marriage to Chandragupta (founder of Mauryan dynasty). Also, harem does not mean where women meant for sex/procreation are kept. It is the female quarters of Islamic societies, since Islam forbids intermingling of sexes.
Any, more later. Please mention all your sources, esp if there are any Rajput, Persian, any other source available for a new perspective on Akbar.
Finally someone spitting facts
Dont trust such youtube channels spreading misinformation
can you please Mention the Website or Book from where these all research taken
Please share this video as much as possible 🙏🙏
Raja Hema was a unluckyly 1 month king. At that time so sad😢😢😢😢
Arey 😢
eye opener didn't knew Akbar was like this always thought it was great
great content and efforts are appreciated great narration and edit 👌👌👌👌🙌🙌🙌🙌
This is a false video …. Half of it is made up story
My dear sister don't judge any king with any video content...
@@shaikajaz1421 Haha madarsachap here bsdk these are all facts
@@shaikajaz1421why?
@@shaikajaz1421 Then why our history books make them hero 🙄??
Atankwadi the aur atankwadi hi rhenge 💯
Didi source bata do kaha se liya h Content
Agar kahi nahi hai ye detail.to apne kaha se padhi ?? Aur. Jani ???
Mention it
Jake akbarnama pado
Whatsapp university se
Tu andha hai kya, sale description dekh
it is a very good effort that you are exposing violent kings about whom we were taught wrong... I'll also look forward to you making videos about ashoka the great killing his 99 brothers, Rajendra chola's harem, Destruction of budhhist monestaries by indian kings, destruction saanchi stupa by pushyamitra, Marathas destruction of temples in West Bengal if kings are to be exposed let these be in you list as well... 😊
jali na teri bhi jali na😂... Those topics you mentioned is already known to everyone
Correct
Ashoka killing exactly 99 imaginary brothers is a blatant lie 🤣
Also maratha attack on Bengal is also a lie already many people made video about the same topic and even Bengali people confirm the same, and talking about other Indian kings and their brutality, it was nothing in comparison to radical invaders, also brutality shown by radical invaders was based on religious hatred against Hindu population.
@@Saurabh____all those hindu kings were suppressing lower caste hindus.😂😂 Ashoka was violant even after the kalinga war.
Ashok ke nahi mahabharat mein 99 bhai the aur ashok ke 99 bhai ke naam bata de agar itne pata hai ashok ke 3 se zyada bhai nahi the
Maharana Pratap ji ki jay🚩
Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Ki Jay 🚩
Jai Mewar Jai Rajputana Jai Maharana Pratap 🚩🚩🚩
@@AKSHATBEHL4U Mahan Akbar Hindu ka pardesi jeja jee 😘
@@AliMozafari-wm9zw Aur tum humaari najaayaz aulaad😘
@@AKSHATBEHL4U you accept that Indians are the Najaayez aulaad of Turk Mughal's Soldiers.. born in Taj Mahal..😘
@@AliMozafari-wm9zw I am not turk Mughal soldier you fool I am Bhartiya 😂
Human Mind - Find bad sides of a Good person .
Find good sides of a bad person . 😅
For me , Akbar , Ashoka, Samudragupta all are great because they have shown their might . A 13 year old boy establish a lost Mughal Empire . A king is expected to fight in war kill the enemies whether hindu or muslims . Ashoks killed jains in kalinga . Samudragupta killed a lot of Hindus that why he is called as Napolean of India .
But no one points out their rule just because they are Hindu kings . they call gupta age as golden age but do they know that Sati pratha or burning women alive and untouchability started from Guptas ? Imagine a society a woman is alive till his husband but not vice versa .
1:38 Why Great 😠😠😠😠😠
A huge round of applause for this intelligent and brave lady how has this courage and intelligence to show the real truth in front of us.😊
One video for daku shivaji and bagora pratap 😂
@@atifrahman1579 ONE VIDEO FOR HIJDE KI AULAD AURANGZEB 🤌🏻.
ONE VIDEO FOR AURANGZEB KI R***I MAA 💯
quack quack quack muutalmaan@@atifrahman1579
@@atifrahman1579chup ho ja bhadwe
@@atifrahman1579accept the truth
our majority hindu kings and warriors had a great sense of respects towards women and they never played any dirty tricks in a fight 🚩🚩🚩🚩
They are also characterless ok😆🤣😂😂😆
@@sumaiya7671 they are not
Hindu kings did have multiple wives, concubines and mistresses.. just because they are Hindu doesn't mean they are all Monks😂😂😂
@@AbhisheK-yr5jz they are they also have so many wives so why not
@@AbhisheK-yr5jz why you guys only blame muslim kings? They are muslim that's why? So hindhu kings also characterless
for A knowledge of sense
the map shown at 2:28 sec is wrong because the state Mewar and a part of Marwar of Rajputana was never captured by any of the Mughal or muslim king in the entire HISTORY. Akbar never married a RAJPUT princess as he was tricked by a Rajput Emperor by getting one of his Farsi maid's daughter married with akbar later she was portrayed as so called Jodha, who never existed. None of the Rajput princess ever married Akbar So stop using false information and recalibrate your research team. These big mistakes are not expected from BigBrainco. KINDLY CORRECT YOUR DATA.
It was an eye opening video! I thought that Akbar is a sweet and innocent king because of the animated shows Akbar and Birbal, the story books etc.... thank you for this .❤
There is Godhi media and Secular media and the truth is difficult to find
All kings were power hungry genocidal oppressive wealth accumulating narcissists, including Muslim nawabs and nizams AND HINDU WARRIORS AND KINGS. Stop being a stupid naive sanatani sheep.
Our history books also white-washed the violent warrior king Krishna, who also gave women as sex slaves/commodities:
Mahabharata 4.72: "And Krishna gave unto each of the illustrious sons of Pandu numerous female slaves, and gems and robes." Krishna’s father, Vasudeva, also had over a thousand concubines. Mahabharata 14.7: "The Brahmanas and Kshatriyas, and Vaisyas, and wealthy Sudras, set out, keeping before them the 16,000 women that had formed Vasudeva’s harem, and Vajra, the grandson of the intelligent Krishna."
What about white-washing Rama's father Dasharath, who also had many concubines? Here, in the passage where Dashrath organized the carnist, violent horse killing, Ashvamedha Yajna, Valmiki's Ramayan states in the Bala Kanda 1.14.35: "Thus, the officiating priests of the ritual, namely hota, adhwaryu and udgaata have received in their hand the Crowned Queen, the neglected wife, and a concubine of the king, next as a symbolic donation in the ritual by the performer, the king."
Hindu scriptures normalize sex slavery by Hindu kings. Natya Shastra 34.26-29: "I shall now describe the classes and function of women who live in the harem and have dealings with the king. They are the chief queen (maha-devi), other queens (devi), his high born wives (sramini), ordinary wives (sthayini), concubines (bhogini) craft women (silpakarini), acresses (natakiya), dancers (nartaki), maids in constant attenance (ancarika), maids of special work (paricarka), maids in constant movement (sancarika), maids for running errands (presana-carika), Mahattaris (matron), old dames (sthavira). Ayuktikas and (overseer), Pratiharis (usher), maidens (kumari)." Natya Shastra 34.40: "Concubines (bhogini) to a king are known as well-behaved, gentle [in manners], not very hanghty, and they are indifferent [to rivals], modest, affectionate but not held in high honor." Similarly, the Narada Purana mentions in 35.43: "A son born of a virgin girl is called ‘Kanina’, and that born of pregnant before marriage is called ‘Sahodhaka’. One purchased by price is called ‘Krita’, ‘Punarbhava’ is two-fold." Manu also wrote on sex slaves ... Manu Smriti 8.415: "A captive of war, a slave for maintenance, the son of a female slave, one purchased for money, a slave obtained as a present, a hereditary one, and one condemned to slavery for any offence, these are the seven kinds of slave."
And what made you think that This is correct information. This is all fake and made lies. Refer to authentic original resources and you will know this video is all lie. Maybe to get views or maybe a political propaganda.
Its no big deal about king having thousand wifes...
Its all about money n power ...even today politicans n businessmens have many gfs...only thing is they keep one or two wife officially ,but at night they have many call girl services.
We have naver saw these dark sides of akbar..thnx for this valuable video you guys never disappoint your subscribers ....such a geart story...❤
"If there are lights there must be shadows to be found as well"
-Madara Uchiha
this video should be shared as much as possible
the real truth of Akbar is brutal
I m speechless. Thank u & entire team for decoding this.
To Castrate someone as a punishment is the most cruel & barbaric thing. Its really scary. 😣
Source of information?
Please make a video about Ashvamedha , people have a lot of misconceptions about it. A certain community is trying to defame hinduism by using that fake theory of theirs .
Chattrapati Shivaji Maharaj ki Jaiii
I Admire to all hindu Yodhas who sacrificed their life to protect Dharma🔥🧡
Whats app se baahar nikal kar kabhi sahih history bhi padh lo. Shivaji ke purkhe Adilshahi ke naukar the. Shivaji ke 300 saal baad tum kuchh bhi gapod banaa lo jabki sach yeh hai ki Mughals se dushmani rakhne waale musalmaanon ne hi Shivaji ko aage badhaaya tha. Daulat Khan, Shidi Ibrahim aur unke jaise tamaam muslim sardar, Shivaji ke saath the aur yeh koi Dharm ki ladaayi nahin thi.
@@yoonus4uare tu toh wahi hai na ola gu uber jiski 10 patniya thi 😂😂😂😂
@@yoonus4u Aagaya Madrassa graduate apne baap ko aisa nahi bolte Asli history ko Whatsapp bolte ho and Fake ko real yahi hain tumhari community
@@M0stAnguish Main Krishna hun jiski 16108 patniyan thi aur jo golok mein hazaaron gopiyon ke ghaaghare uthaata tha. Main Brahma hun jisne apni beti Saraswati ka balaatkaar kiya. Main Vishnu hun jisne Vrinda ka balaatkaar kiya. Main Shiv hun jisne Mohini roopi Vishnu ka balaatkaar kar Ayappa ko janma. Aur main woh Shiv hun jisne apne hi pote Aardi ka guda maithun kar kar ke uski hatya kar di.Tu 10 patniyon ki baat karta hai. Abhi ke liye itna hi, baaqi tere agle comment ke liye. Jaan le, main kul se shuddh Brahman hun. Tu mujhse zyaada nahin jaanta.
@@siddharthdas9974 O, goo khaane aur moot peene waale bhagwa balaatkaari Lindu, jaanwar ke goo khaane aur uska moot peene ko dharm samajhne waale, Lu*d aur Cho*t ki pooja karne waale, rail ki patriyon par baith kar hagne waale, tu dega history ka certificate. Tere to naam mein hi Das hai, Baap to tera main hun beta, Main kul se Brahman hun. Jaa pehle jaakar, paani aur moot mein farq seekh phir aana gyaan pelne.
Very Well Explained Story ! Great Job but one thing must be clear that Maharana Pratap had defeated Akbar many times. He is a Kind and True Warrior
😅
Akbar was not the reason for Chittorgarh jauhar , khilji was. Just a humble correction🤍
And the video was really very well narrated And the visuals were really amazing good job to the team 👏🏻👏🏻
Akbar ne khilji se zyada ganda mar mat kiya chittor mein
Go&have some study
@snehaasandhu
@@AyushPal124khilji was more brutal while akbar redempt himself after the massacre of chittor just like ashoka
Well, firstly this profound sentence of "Akbar the Great" should be radicalized completely. He wasn't great by the loose and liberal meaning of the word. Secondly, Akbar was cruel and it should be notified.
Thanks to the team of @Raaz
for keeping the authentic sources in front of the viewers.
i agree it must me said AKBAR THE EVIL and not AKBAR THE GREAT
Bhai badshah girls say rape kertay hein lakhoun girls say ap ko kion samajh nahi ati india aur Pakistan should unity and provide safety their women's and learn lessons from the history
Hit 1 Like for Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj who defeated Akbar my times 🔥 Jai Shivray ❤️
Bro correction maharana pratap defetad akbar and chhatrapati shivaji maharaj defeated aurangzeb
5:11 Shameful! Know the complete history of King Maharana Pratap. Because they never lost a single battle
So then there is no difference Ashoka and Akbar. Ashoka also massacred thousands in Kalinga and then suddenly turned into a preacher. The reality is politics is all about personal stuff nobody cares about anyone, everything is a drama. In wars you have to kill people, you have to use swords.
HEY QUEEN YOU DROPPPED THIS👑