Violent History of Indian Kings
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 พ.ค. 2024
- Follow me on Instagram: / mohak.mangal
Read my newsletter: www.sochbymm.com/subscribe
******
📃Sources: docs.google.com/document/d/15...
******
🔍✍️Research:
Zaira Khan: / zaira-khan-7435a9189
✂️🎛️Editing:
Yash Vyas: / yashvyas24
Mohit Bharti: / mohitbharti_
Chief of Staff:
Ajeesh Babu: / ajeesh_babu
🎨Thumbnail :
Aanchal Verma: / aanchal_creates
Want to work with us? Check this link!
tinyurl.com/22pxjjtv
******
Like the background music? I use Epidemic Sound. You can get a 30-day free trial using this referral: bit.ly/3A7bUx7
******
🗳Support on Patreon: / sochyoutube
👾Discord: / discord
🐦Twitter: / mohakmangal
📷Instagram: / mohak.mangal
👤Facebook: / sochyoutube
******
When certain chapters on the Mughal dynasty were removed by the government, a lot of people on social media celebrated the move by saying that Mughals were often associated with violence and the destruction of religious sites. So, it would be right to not teach the children about such Kings. But did you know that in India's history, there were several kings who have made similar use of violence? Even glorified kings like Ashoka and Akbar have been known to use violence!
What drove these kings to exercise violence? What were the reasons behind their decision? But more importantly, so many Kings throughout history have made use of violence, what standards should be used to describe them? Watch the video to get answers!
Playlists
🇮🇳Indian Society: • Hijab: Ban Right or Wr...
🗺Geopolitics and Foreign Affairs: • Will China Invade Taiwan?
🧍🏽♀️Issues of a Young Indian: • Are Indian Girls Bad a...
💰Economy: • How Kerala Changed its...
🗳Indian Politics: • UP Elections: Why Are ...
🇮🇳 Discoveries of India: • How Goa Joined India
📈Money, Stocks, and Crypto: • Why Indian Youth is NO...
Markers
00:00 Intro
03:30 Magadha, Vijayanagar Empire
07:46 Wadeyar Empire
11:29 Destruction of religious sites
14:18 Violence against women
15:21 Tipu Sultan
17:23 Akbar
19:02 Rashtrakutas
![[UNCUT] รัฐสั่งหยุดปล่อยคลื่น! แต่หยุดพลังปะทุ “น้องหญิง” ไม่ได้ I คนดังนั่งเคลียร์](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RmQh47eIiV0/mqdefault.jpg)
Correction: There is a debate around when Emperor Ashoka converted. For example, Sanjeev Sanyal’s book says that Emperor Ashoka converted to Buddhism before entering the Kalinga war. Ashoka invaded Kalinga in 262 BC and a minor rock edicts that Ashoka had converted to Buddhism more than two years earlier. Thank you to those who pointed this out!
Source: www.hindustantimes.com/this-excerpt-from-a-new-book-recasts-emperor-ashoka-reputation-as-a-pacifist/story-TqfYHU3yhLxt3SXFfqUK5J.html
Ok hai
It happens
I think we all are getting brainwashed by our government.
But the thing is we are not even noticing it just like North Korean(but usse kam)
Lekin wiki peh toh 4 years before kalinga war Bola hain
Thank you. I just don't get why Indians see our past as being glorious when the modern age is the most peaceful & living standards are much better now! Maybe, it's not wanting to face the reality that for a thousand years, we were enslaved by "foreigners", when in reality there was no concept of "country" here before 1947. Plus Monarchs were no friends of the civilians & absolute power has always corrupted people, absolutely.
The king of dholakpur is the most peaceful 😌
😂😂
But what about the affair of indumati and Chhota Bheem😅
Oh gosh your comment make me laugh 😂 I was very serious about the topic and your comment just awesome 👏🏻
best kingdom ever
And the army of dholakpur is most useless
"Show me a King who has never used Violence, Show me a Politician who is not corrupted, Show me a businessman who has never evaded his taxes"
behind every great fortune , there is a crime... that explains all
Muslim used to kill and covert Hindus and hindu king used to fight for power.
And that's not same totally..
Politician Name - Lal Bahadur Shastri Ji ❤ Go and reasearch on Shastri Ji 😌🙏
@@POWET619 but his infantry and cavalry did commit crimes in Bengal ...
see brother , nobody is saint here, everyone has got blood on their sleeves
@@POWET619 extremist of anything is not good for you and society 💀
5:05 Ashoka killed 99 of his step brothers....it's just mentioned in Ashokavadana(written by buddhists), and nowhere else....now there's a possiblity that buddhists just exagarreted the real numbers to show how he changed after adapting to buddhism
😂😂😂😂
Bro there are endless possibilities no one knows the exact detailed history . So stop writing these nonsense comments 😅😅😊😊
Even we guys being Hindu don't know the actual event even we rely on the sculpture and books
@@SAreez-if it is fiction come to Bihar you will know it 😂
HE KILLED THEM BECAUSE THEY KILLED ACHARYA CHANAKYA BY PLANNING AND ALSO THEY WENT AGAINST THEIR OWN COUNTRY BHARAT . IN REALITY SAMRAT ASHOK WAS REALLY GREAT BECAUSE HE ALWAY HEARS THE CITIZENS NEEDS AND ALSO HE DID'NT KILL ANIMALS HE WAS A PURE GREAT KING
When you're reading history, put on the history glasses. Don't use the 21st Century lenses to view a period and judge the people that have passed 100s and 1000s of years before you were born 👍 it was a different period, different mindset. What a nice video Mohak, great work!
Video is myth
Show me Tamur Lang . Changes khan. And Eidi Amin.
Evan tamur killed lot of Muslim in world
Quran padho aur ex-muslim jaferheritec ki the mahamad series dekho sachay jano islam aur Allah and paigambar ki
Well said..
Bhai tu khud ko history ka student kahna chor da,, in hindu religion text it is clearly mentioned that buddha is the 9th avatar of lord vishnu, to kiya us time ka king padhata nahi tha kiya ya bas reels scrool karta tha,, in pa belive karna walo sudhar jaa?,,koi apna hee religion ka statue ko kyu Toraga
Acknowledging one's history and its darkest moments is very important. Religion shouldn't matter.
Andhnamazis attendance 👇
@@_Vagabond_Sourav Bhai pahle mere comment ko toh samajh lo 😆😆😆
Rest of the Andhbhakts attendance
👇
We all know these things. But we outgrew such things. We dont praise our violent acts by the violent kings.
Problem is today peaceful community will gather and use these stories to justify hatred for anybody who isnt Muslim and justify oppression of all non-Muslims all over ummah to this day.
@@tarun1982nobody did that and second, since you are talking about present times, it's Muslims all around the world who are suffering the most not the other way round.
Lesson - Never idealise any king irrespective of their religion, and stay away from political agendas based on religios
true apart from jain kings in souther india from 2 nd to 12 th century,all were biased
@@dankpanda-hl3wnand shivaji maharaj
Absolutely. In fact, never idealize (or idolize) anyone. Everyone is/was human.
@@righteousrebellious2330nah he looted surat because it was important port for mughals and he killed militants not innocent people
Mohammad was also a warlord still people think he was a prophet 😭
Hindu aur Muslim donon hi MOHAK ko gali de rahe hain jabki usne kuch galat nahin kaha balki jo sach hai vahi kaha par sach kadva hota hai har kisi ko hazam nahin hota
Ashoka hindu thodi thaa he was budhist
Ashoka Kaling ke battle se phele se hi Buddhist thaa
@@abhinavkumar6223
🤣🤣🤣, Oh okay,maine socha bhuddism hinduism se aaya tha, any way when it benifits gobars they change there stance
How did he say truth?? He just is believing what "historians" said. You need archeological and archeo-astrological proofs for your videos, not just blindly believing the stuff that "historians" say.
@@JayMehtaJay
exactly, see you need dna test to prove that your dad is whom your mother says. without evidence yoi cant simply accept your current DAD
Such a unbiased, balanced and EDUCATIVE video
All schools and colleges should show this to the students.
And uncle and aunties should also see it🎉
Aree yaar jisko sab leftist bolte hai wahi tumko unbaised lag rha h
lol as if no Indian knew this....He was a narcissist who was avoided by his own Father, always craved for love went on mltiple battles...killed many to prove his worth and yet was invisible....he is considered great in today's India is because of his teachings and works post Kalinga war. Let me Educate you - he made multiple statements about his remorse and regretting on killing and captivating. he changed by admitting his mistakes, started thinking and worked on the futility and Tragedy of war. Post then he dedicated his life and huge wealth towards building a society where people lived by the rules of virtue and good moral behavior. There are some of his words carved on the walls by Ashoka about the religious tolerance "Should one blames other religions or over glorify ones own religion, they are infact doing harm to it and an act should not be done". Ashoka erected pillars ( Ashoka symbols ) all across his kingdom where the official reads scripts written by Ashoka to the poors where his official took the complaints and compliments for the betterment. *HE IS GREAT BECAUSE he became the first Indian king to think about the welfare of the poor rather than using them just for tax revenue* as he stated "the final conquest is the conquest of the right and not of the might".
@@rachnasingh9774
even if he's leftist, is he wrong? Did he make up facts or said something which was not documented? I'm a right winger, and I vote for BJP but this is a history video, and should be perceived as such.
It’s important to learn the good, the bad and the ugly of our history without any religious colour because as George Santayana had once said - ‘Those who forget history are condemned to repeat it’.
Kudos for picking up this topic and not flinching from speaking truth. Humans have an intrinsic desire to always glorify their past without knowing anything and picking only selective evidence to confirm the same . Always good to have an honest reflection of it.
Andhnamazio attendance 👇
@@mirraza4692 darpok toh tu hai 😜 saley andh namazi 😂
Exactly. We must not be selective pickers but tell u what... He is super picky while searching contents of the video and my conclusion is- He's trying to remove few stains of Zihadi rulers by trying to equate them w ancient Hidnu rulers( most of whom had humanity except during political wars ). Look out for Mohak Mangal's research team and sources n I'd need nothing more to say in this. I'm doing Honours in History.
@@NeerajMishra03Well you can see his Research Manager is a Hindu. I have been following Mohak for a long time now and he is not super picky about the content. He also made a video on Aurangzeb. The thing is you are not able to digest the history.
Dollars Trilogy refrence?
Not only Indian kings but also rulers across the world employed violence as a means of asserting their authority. Historical accounts provide numerous examples of this widespread phenomenon. For instance, ancient Egyptian pharaohs employed military force to expand their territories and maintain dominance over their subjects. In Europe, kings and emperors engaged in brutal wars to conquer new lands and establish their rule. Similarly, Chinese dynasties, such as the Qin and Han, employed violence to consolidate their power and enforce their laws. From the Aztec rulers in Mesoamerica to the feudal lords in Japan, violence was a prevalent tool utilized by leaders worldwide to exert control and enforce their rule.
Very true. This long history of violence that we have based our whole society on sometimes makes the idea of nonviolence sound funny, even if that is what many of us want.
Andhbhakts attendance
👇
True. But the western world came out of medieval barbarity sooner than we did. If not for the Britishers (It's a constitutional monarchy), we would still be divided & under some dictator's rule! Sometimes you need an advanced civilization to make you free from shackles created by your own people.
@@VitaminProtein4256librandu attendance 😂😂
@@VitaminProtein4256 andhnamazi spotted 😂😂😂
Mohak sir! Your research and content is really really valuable, please keep educating us🙏🙏
Hallo Mohak i would like to know what AI Text to image generation you use? I will be really thankful for your help.
Being a Buddhist, I can confirm that King Ashoka was a Buddhist many years before the Kalinga war. There is an inscription in sanchi mentioned Ashoka as a PRINCE tripped to sanchi stupa with his newly married wife. In 14th major rock edict of Ashoka does not mention he converted to Buddhism after Kalinga war but he felt more attraction to Buddhism after Kalinga.
Secondly, being a Buddhist, it does not mean king can not fight wars. Wars are integral part of moranchy. Monarchy fight war in interests of their kingdom. History is full of wars.
Despite Kalinga war, king Ashoka had very beautiful views and doctrine reflected in his administration and propagation of Buddhism, mentioned in his rock edicts.
Andhnamazis attendance 👇
Ashoka the cruel never change to God person he was always a evil person mass murder who killed his brother for greedy of throne he killed millions of innocent civilians people who don't accept Buddhism
He killed millions of innocent civilians people in Kaling he killed all anika
पैदा तो सनातन वैदिक धर्म मे हुआ था ना 😂
बादमे तुम लोग 14 अक्टूबर 1956 मे नव बुधिस्ट बन गये ... तुम्हारे भी बाप दादा पंढरपूर के वारी मे जाते थे इसका मतलब हिंदू थे ..... अब सिर्फ तुम लोग आरक्षण के लिये हिंदू दिखाते हो जाती(महार) के प्रमाणपत्र पर ...
सिद्धार्थ गौतम ने सनातन धर्म से तंग आ कर अपनी अलग एक विचार धारा बनाई ....धर्म नही बनाया । तुम उसी विचार धारा को धम्म/धर्म बोलते हो ....
पर धर्म तो सिर्फ एक ही है सत्य सनातन वैदिक धर्म 🕉️
दम है तो रोकलो...
@@keshavmishra07bhai tum log Eurasia se aae ho hum logo ne kuch bola?, nav bodh nahi, its Buddhist there nothing called “neo Buddhist”.
@@keshavmishra07 according to generic study ( r1a gene ) tum log toh arab, Eurasia se aye ho.
Now Indian TH-cam content is becoming more mature.. .less politics and less hindu muslim context ....thanks to youtubers like you...❤❤
this video is litrally politics and helps to counter the narrtive like
muslims king were all good no bad muslim king only hindu king bad and
hindu were all good no bad hindu king only muslim king bad .
Thanks mohak
Look at India from the lens of jaati and you will understand what jaats was violent and what were peaceful. It was the Mongolic and Turkic people that were vilest of the vile. They justified it using Islam and Islam supported it unlike dharma.
@@thezoldics7648 nazi ka jo hal hua yad rakhna
This guy makes half researched videos. He haven't even read Bhagwat Geeta but still think he can give us Geeta gyan on "caste".
Hats off to you for taking this topic..this is something to think about.
Please make more such videos. These are very educational ❤
Great Work Man, really well explained!
In history
there are
No Heros
Just lesser evils
true
@@omsahoo4370yes bhai ek baar prove kardo offensively nahi puch raha hu just asking normally 😊
No we have hero chatrapati shivaji maharaj
Lesser evils are heros in comparison to worst evils, it has to be seen with the lens of net positive or net negative
@@zhreyaz its mean you don't know about chhatrapati shivaji maharaj
The goal of history education should be 2 :
(i) To identify the reasons which made us stand.
(ii) To identify the reasons which made us fall.
If we know them instead of date memorization we would able to recreate the first and avoid the second and lead to glory once again.
Exactly history should be about reason, facts and philosophy instead of personal ideas, opinions and dates.
Wrong, the goal of history should be to make us feel proud of our ancestor's achievements and understand our roots and culture. From where we belong and what our identity is.
Muskil se 17 19 dates yaad karni hoti hai wo bhi nahi hoti baccho se toh fir wo kya karenge , for classes upto 10
@@malharaher904Nope. Then what could German make proud of ? Nazi Germany ? .
It's not about proud because political parties use this for propoganda and communal violence .
The goal of learning history is to not repeat the same mistakes. But humans have a tendency to do exactly that.
Wonderfully researched ad Very well informed video . Thank you 👍🏻
Scary.. people who are in Power have always been cruel, manipulative and controlled regardless of religion,kingdom or political parties. Common people will never understand this.
Andhnamazis attendance 👇
being in power need crueity,,,wrna RAJA HARISH CHAND TO SABKO IDEAL LGTE HAI
Andhbhakts attendance
👇
@@shrutiagrawal8700 isn't there a difference between being cruel and punishing cruel people.
@@VitaminProtein4256 andhnamazi spotted 🤣🤣🤣
I can't help but notice, you guys used A.I. ( probably midjourney ) to generate many cool passing by shots and characters from pushyamitra to 40 thousand Coorgi shot ( 16:07 ) you guys are using it right, we should surely appreciate it. Using A.I. to make videos more engaging is the way to really move forward, great job guys
You observed rightly dude😎
Yes it probably is midjourney. However it is a paid platform. I have not seen better AI images in any other AI platforms than midjourney and Midjourney is way better than stable diffusion and other AI Image tools.
If Pushyamitra did not killed his King then India be Greek colony go and check history
@@Shubham12887 aise to aladdin khLji ne bhi mangolo se bharat ko bachaya tha
@@rkv08 Bhai Jake history padh agr vishwas nhai hai to European or Persian history ki books padh mangols ne kabhi main army se attack nhai kiya tha or Khan general India ki respect karta tha Or Khilji ne india ke liya nhai apne riyast ko bacchane ke liya Mangols ke 3 battel army ko harya tha jisma mangols kaam the
Brother buddhist also destroyed so many hindu temples, and converted into Buddhist temples.
Then Adi Jagadguru Shankaracharya revived hinduism.He did shastrartha with Buddhists and then defeated them, then he revived Sanatana Dharma.
😂
That might be true.
I think buddh historians purposely elaborated Ashoka as the most cruel to prove that how accepting Buddhism changed him..I read in a book in bauddh library in which Hindu dharm was purposely being criticised to show that how bauddh ideal is better,so not every thing we read could be believed..
Kaha se laate ho ye faltu ka gyan 😂
Tuu hii video bana dee ..
Loved the video very much ❤.... nobody can think of making such videos 🎉
Just a correction emperor Ashoka converted himself to Buddhism before he went into the kalinga war. It is said ashoka dyed the river daya full red with the bloodshed and then in the aftermath he changed himself seeing the bloodshed. Then he truly started following Buddhism by making monasteries,inns and preaching non-violence and then he went on live as a monk by handing over his thorne to his son. Thats our local
folklore in odisha. Again great video mohak bhaiya❤❤
True that he killed 150,000 men women & children as per his own edicts. By this time he was already Buddhist.
Daya river on outskirts of Bhubaneswar turned red with blood....
Ashoka never exiated
Hinduism never existed as a religion during Ashoka time,its the brahmin propaganda that hinduism is older than Buddhism, if you read Balmiki Ramayan, Ayodhya kand Shri Ram and Rishi Jabeli samvaad it talk negatively about buddhism even though Brahmin claim Ramayan is various thousand year before buddhism
@@loney403ou can’t create empire before violence, Ashoka was responsible for bringing civilisation in uncivilised peoples of orissa and other regions, his empire was only empire which ruled almost Akhand bharat,as per Buddhism, it has whole traditions of wrath god worship and violence for dealings with uncivilised layman only shramana are expected to be non violent and a king is not shramana or monk, non violence of buddhism is propaganda of brahmin who want to blame them for muslim rule
@@max-cs9ko Killed 150000 n injured another 100000 men women and children to civilise them. Who is left to be civilised. Is not it very similar to the tyrant and mass murderer Ghengis Khan.
Remember that Kalinga was the only land that could not be invaded by his ancestors, so there is no question of its people being uncivilised.
Correction: Ashoka didn't become Buddhist after seeing the bloodshed of the Kalinga war, he was already a Buddhist and had been one for years before the war.
Wrong he is shatriya originally
@@pokemonfanbeast393 tf?
Or maybe he was on his way to become a Buddhist
@@manishadwani386 yes Chandragupt mentioned as Kshatriya in Buddhist Text
Chadragupta accepted jainism
Bindusar accepted ajeevika
Ashoka accepted ajeevika earlier but later he accepted bhuddism.
But they were kshatriya
Asoka accepted the policy of dammagosh cultural conquest
We people need to stop comparing the 21 st century lessons of mahatma gandhi shit to the history, hinduism has always appreciated defence , whether lord ram or lord krishna , took avatar to destroy evil , and for that they had to fight , fight doesn’t denote violence. The intentions of the fight does , MAHARANA PRATAP , CHATTRAPATI SHIVAJI fought to save their motherland , does that make them evil , does our army man who fights day and night makes them evil ? War is always a part of our society and everything has consequences , we better stop comparing the ideologies , non-violence cannot exist because if there’s sun there is moon , evil - good , THE CONCLUSION :- WE NEED TO FIGHT FOR THE RIGHT , FIGHT FOR OUR MOTHERLAND AND STAND ON THE IDEOLOGIES OF OUR GODS ⚜️
caNo one is comparing mahatma gandhis ideology with the past ideologies. there are different ideologies with different perspective. a sensible person can make use of both the ideoplogies. but gobars /andbhakts doesnt have the IQ to understand this
Hey mohak, liking these videos… hope you make more videos on ancient and medieval history…best luck…
Muslim or Hindu
Kings are known for violence
There are only few kings who didn't used violence and used relationship for their kingdom
True, violence is almost inevitable in monarchy but I believe its not wrong in the larger picture, but hey, we aren't a monarchy now, we're a democracy now, or are we?
Andhbhakts attendance
👇
@@VitaminProtein4256 abb tere papa ko kaha sai lau
@@VitaminProtein4256u mean all the ibrahim k najayas aulads?😂
Monarchs suck. End of story.
Accepting your history is the biggest Wisdom❤
what do u even mean
@@DellConagher1Muslims should accept Muhammed is not messenger of God and Islam isn’t a peaceful religion
Because it was Aurangzeb wouldn’t have invaded to demolish temple
We must not be selective pickers . Tell u what... He is super picky while searching contents of the video and my conclusion is- He's trying to remove few stains of Zihadi rulers by trying to equate them w ancient Hidnu rulers( most of whom had humanity except during political wars ). Look out for Mohak Mangal's research team and sources n I'd need nothing more to say in this. I'm doing Honours in History. I repeat: "He's being totally selective in his content e.g. choosing one bad story from a region in the history of 2500 years and totally ignoring good, humane, kind and generous kings who ruled that place for thousands of years"
Tell him to make about minar e do dinner and he will know about the real truth that who is most crucial.. muslim ruler or others ruler
@@NeerajMishra03 absolutely right bro .....I think people shouldn't learn from this shit people like this guy and @dhruv rathe ...they don't even tell the people right also and they are doing just to are money only .........so, I request u all that if u want to know about Indian history than read a book donn't learn from this shit guy.....they are totally misleading the youth......🥲🥲🥲🥲
Cash liya ya BITCOINs ?
andhbhakt?
Nai nai bhai education liya hai .
Comment karne ke liye payment Gau mutr mei liya hai ya rss mei premium membership ka coupon.
@@mohammedadnan8497ni ayesha dii hogi ek trip💀💀
Andhbhakt 🤡
Nobody is saying that violence is not there before islam.
The thing is everybody wants the real truth. The books showed that islam is spread out of love.
But it is not true.
Not only Aurangzeb but akhbar and shahjahan are also not kind hearted kings.
Moreover, there is a difference in war and non-war violence.
So everyone is asking to show the violence and peace as it is for both Hindu and Muslim kings. But NCERT hides the cruelty in Islamic era.
I don’t think so , it’s clearly written in those books about the cruelty of the kings.
Civilised people know that most of the kings in most of the time dont even care what their religion says, their utmost priority is to safeguard and expand their kingdom in whatsoever way.
Love your content ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Exactly💯 People just forget to use their brain...
Not with Muslim ruler cause ther motive was to convert and kill kafir unlike other Hindu rulers who fight for thrown and power lust not world domination.
There is difference
Just like today's leaders except their motive is to get more $$$$$
Maharana Pratap had half of the India if he accepted the Akbar's offer.
@@therayr.7619 *Haan sochta reh*
Today many Hindus are not ready to accept this thing: that their Hindu kings were violent, they have entered so much in politics and religion that they do not even know the truth.I like your content mohak. Be continue 👍
Before 2014 it wasn't like today, hinduz were taught to hate their Hindu kings and lick the boots of mughal invaders for the sake of congressi secularism.
I agree hindu rules were also very violent but It's not all about violence..Hindu rules did not marry there own daughter or married there sisters.. And they didn't not make female trafficking a big business and didn't rape females of other religion in front of there fathers or husband if the refuse to convert.. You need to study more before defending your mughal idols 😂😂
Their violentness was not motivated and justified by their culturee and religion, even the facts he is stating are fake created by marxistt historians, sita ram goel ji wrote letter to romila thappar to mention sources on which she was saying hinduss destroyed and looted their own temples and also budhistt sites. lol
Ashoka never existed
Today majority of hindu act like andhbhakt they don't want to accept facts and they just want to blame people of other caste, religion. That's why our country ranks 137th on happines index
Amazing research Mohak.. keep up the good work.. love your videos
It’s rare that indian king killed any farmer or other working class because they have great part in gdp growth and were useful for their own good. But people like tipu sultan (you know who i am talking about) were merciless against this working class.
This is how unbiased videos look you have some courage man, in today's India we can't get agents or support to anyone directly but you spoke about it is much appreciated.
this is how educated and knowledgeable people look and act like much support keep up the good work
equating hinduss and muslims is this what we call unbiasness, showing fabricated claims made by marxistt historians is it being neutral LOL
Unbiased? I don't know what his personal motives are, but he did not research well for this video. It's the first time I am watching something like this from him. Never expected that.
@@mysterious5678 elaborate
@percygekkouga2151 @percygekkouga2151 OK. So from starting
1. He cherry-picked lines from the Mahabharat episode, and it would seem like Shri Krishna wanted war. But the reason why Shri Krishna said not to attack first was because it is crossing the limits of Dharma. There is literally a 'Shanti Parva' in Mahabharat where Shri Krishna tries really hard to establish peace despite knowing the fact that Mahabharat will happen. You can literally see how much Hard Work Shri Krishna tries to put in order to establish peace and says that if for peace any Pratigya is sacrificed, then it means that Shanti is quite cheap
2. I don't get it why he took Ramayan example despite there being nothing wrong there.
3. He mentioned half truths about Samrat Ashoka.
1) Samrat Ashok never had 99 brothers. The Ashokvadhana is an overexaggeration. He maximum would have around 6 brothers.
2) Samrat Ashok was not always violent. He was a pretty peaceful guy at the start. He infact managed to stop a rebel, which his elder brother Sushim couldn't without any bloodshed. He was pretty famous among people due to his good governance. He became much more violent after his mother death as it was Sushim who killed her and also tried to kill her pregnant wife when he was on exile. It was Radhagupta who saved his wife.
3) Samrat Ashoka never killed any ministers. The reason is that all ministers liked him and were convinced that he should be the king. He was righteous, and his subjects in Ujjain were living happily, and he was an expert at stopping rebels. Only one two ministers were on Sushim's side. However, Sushim was pretty much useless as he couldn't stop revolt in his own regime. He was flirty and much more. Under Radhagupta, all ministers tried to convince Bindusar that Ashok should be the king, but he had too much love for his son. He died like that, but before Sushim came, all ministers summoned Ashok and declared him as king, which led to 4 years long Civil War. After Kalinga's war, he was convinced on Non Violence but made a strict rule.
3. He mentioned Jalouka as the son of Samrat Ashok. However, there was no son of Ashok whose other name was Jalouka. Historians like Romila Thappar say that Jalouka might be Kunala, but that's highly unlikely reasons being.
1) He was taking care of Takshashila Province and not Kashmir.
2) Based on some of his stories, he is someone who will never go against his father.
3) He never became the king due to the fact that he was made blind by Tishyaraksha (Samrat Ashok's wife).
4. Tishyaraksha was jealous of Bodh Tree, but she never destroyed any Bodha temple. In fact, Samrat Ashok was already Buddhist before marrying her. So it made no sense. She was given a death sentence for blinding Kunala.
5. I don't know why he mentioned Krishnadevaray and Tenali Rama as they had no role in the next story.
6. The King Shashanka fact is correct. However, some historians also suggest that it was done as political motivation, and Buddha people lived peacefully under him.
7. He mentions that Chanakya Neeti also promotes violence for the throne. However, in order to understand Chanakya Neeti, you should know some basic principles of Neeti. Chanakya Neeti is for making of a perfect king and nation. Neeti is subsect of Dharma meaning ways to establish Dharma within society. There are four Principles of Neeti namely 'Sam (Peacefully talking)', 'Dam (Using greed of a person)', 'Dand (You know)', 'Bhed (do anything)'. The order of using this principle is same as above. That's the reason why Violence is necessary. So this argument is pretty stupid as in order to maintain Dharma (Dharma does not mean religion). Not all kings who used violence were good. I agree on that fact. The fact is wrong that Chanakya Neeti promotes violence.
8. This fact is als wrong that Jain and Bhudhism gain popularity in 6th CE due to acst discrimination. This religions were always there in the society and a big number of people followed it.
9. I agree the fact that many Kings before Mughal were bad and they did wrong. However, the one I see people idolize are- Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, Maharana Pratap, Krishnadevaray, Kuvar Amar Singh, Raja Raja Chola-1, Samudragupta, Chandragupta-2, Chandragupta Maurya,etc. Also the reason why we should celebrate Ashok was because he saw faults in his way and changed for better. Also the fact that he never intentionally hurt his subjects or other people. That's the reason why he got two names as Chand Ashok and Devanampriya Priyadarshi. It would have been better if he had divided the video in 3 parts and did proper research.
We must not be selective pickers . Tell u what... He is super picky while searching contents of the video and my conclusion is- He's trying to remove few stains of Zihadi rulers by trying to equate them w ancient Hidnu rulers( most of whom had humanity except during political wars ). Look out for Mohak Mangal's research team and sources n I'd need nothing more to say in this. I'm doing Honours in History. I repeat: "He's being totally selective in his content e.g. choosing one bad story from a region in the history of 2500 years and totally ignoring good, humane, kind and generous kings who ruled that place for thousands of years"
Mohak is like a teacher who explains with calmness
Andhnamazis attendance 👇
Biased video." Violence" done by kings is used as a means to justify Islam in India and how we all should be tolerant towards Mughal kings.
"Violence" is pointed out as a common quality shared by both hindu/mughal kings and therefore its suggested that Hinduism is no different than Islam.
It is pointed out, that the Hindu kings are also "violent" towards foreign religions and therefore it is only fair Mughals kill Hindus and destroy Hindu temples.
The youtuber suggest that we all should hate the Hindu kings equally as Mughals🤣 because "VIOLENCE"🤣
All the while the video ignores the main points of Islamic ideology:
how it is intolerant by design.
how it is political by design.
how it is a foreign religion and not indigenous.
how many violent verses it contains compared to Hinduism.
how the scriptures preaches violence against other religions. (does Hinduism do that?)
violence is common in power struggles across all religions. WW1 was Christians vs Christians (of the same family). Violence is an outcome of war, And war is fought for Ideology.
Is the youtuber implying that we should view the Hindu kings in the same disdain that we view Mughal kings because "violence" is a common factor in both? Ideology does not matter apparently.
@@I_dont_need_a_nameburnol lele 😂
@@ehaaronhow does it even matter if violence is used for religion or not? Violence is bad anyway, and religion was just another tool to use in justifying the violence. Just read more books, and you will find hundreds of more examples by Hindu/Jain/Buddhist kings b
@@ehaaronpolitical? Violent? You literally have writings preaching politica and violence 😂😂😂
Bro forget to draw a line between voilence and brutality 😂🤣
You missed Chatrapati Sivaji
I am so so so proud to be Jain but now i don't what happened with the brahmans in karnataka and tamil nadu they started converting jains into brahmans forcely and also khandit the historic jain temples😢😢
History is filled with blood and battles. And hence should be seen from the eyes of it's own context and not Modern day concepts
Andhbh4kts attend4nce
👇
@@VitaminProtein4256 andhnamazi spotted 😂😂😂
@@I_dont_need_a_nameandhpujari spotted
@@Mahmood786 andhnamazi spotted 🤣🤣🤣
@@Mahmood786 surat kisanae ki
I feel like many Indians nowadays are very disconnected from actual facts and the truth itself. Whenever I try to argue with them with facts and stuff they claim that I'm being an Anti-Hindu. So I just leave them with their small mind and let them argue with other people. This channel brings informative content hope they watch it and get some sense.
Can't agree more.
Fr
Anti national go to Pakistan
fr
i think your most likely conflating issues , i imagine its not facts that there was issues with rulers , i most likely think its a religious issue , so that they see facts but one set is just because , whilst the Muslim ruler was due to religion , the trouble is they are correct that Islam played a role in the crimes , but so did all other religions and its that fact i think they dont want to accept , however i have to say i have also found this among Muslims when it comes to Islam , and Christians on Christians crimes
Sir please don't take statements of marxist historians.
Please tell original history of India
Violence is a tool, if used wrongly, it's result is only destruction but if used wisely, it results to development.
19:56 Yes , it is true that there was no king without brutality and violence but there was one king who only fought for his swarajya. The king we called people's king our chatrapati shivaji maharaj,, 🚩 . In his entire life he fought against aurangzeb. Its so sad people in india didn't acknowledge him apart form Maharashtra.
He also killed jawli king chandra rao more
Whole family beheaded.
"Every kings sword tasted the blood of enemy"
Yahi bat es video me bataya hai mohak ne.
@@yogeshtayde3263Chandra Rao More is commando of chief of Adhilshahi sultanate
@@yogeshtayde3263 he just killed chandra rao not whole family don't lie
The Maratha atrocities in Bengal are immortalised in Bengali folk literature. They killed, raped, drowned people, burned down villages. An estimated 400k people died in the raids
Andhnamazis attendance 👇
Khoka Ghumalo Para Juralo, Borgi elo deshe
Bulbulite dhan kheyeche khajna dibe kishe?
Dhan furolo, Paan furolo, khajnar upay ki?
Ar kota din sabar kor rashun bunechi
Dhaniya Piyaj geche poche sorshe khete jol
Khora bonnay sesh korilo borshar fashal
Dhaner gola, chaler jhuri shob sudhu khali
Chinno kapor joriye gaye shoto shoto taali.
Only for Bengalis. Showed maratha violence 😢
@@I_dont_need_a_nameits not about muslim...
I am a hindu, and yes marathas invaded bengal!!
Not just bengal. ...marathass captured and rap.ed bihari womens too
They massacred a large amount bihari population ...theur is no mention of this atrocities in bihars curriculum
Here is the mention of peshwa Marathas not chhatrapati shivaji maharaj
Wow brother, it was fun to hear about our king in that period, I wish that king would have lived in the Mughal era too! I am proud of King Bimbisara, and the great Emperor Ashoka 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗💐💐💐💐💐💐
We all would have scored 100 in history exam if Mohak was our history teacher
I am from CBSE board and the books barely talked about the history of violence.
Andhbhakts attendance
👇
He very briefly said Aurangzeb decapitated Dara Shukoh. It was asked to Dara Shukoh by Aurangzeb if he'd punish him , he said he'd have dismembered Aurangzeb's body and his body parts displayed at every corner of his kingdom vise versa
😩😩😩😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 if only he was
@@WasimAhmad-bv9mx so us nae apne bhai ka sath aise kar bhi Diya how cruel insan tha yeh jallad
Appreciate you work. It was good topic to throw light on !
You have only given examples of kings doing violence. There were many kings who fought for development, prosperity and breaking the old tradition.Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj is the best example of a great ruler.
5:38 I just wanna correct it ashoka the great was already a bhuddhist before invading Kalinga
He already Buddhist - Kalinga war SE pehle.Sushima Jo older brother tha Ashoka Ka usko Ashoka ne dhoke se Maratha,
Meme army
👇
No, in some sources he was a shiv bhakt before war
@@gaurakshsinghi9219 which source giveme source
@@ayokshayuska source WhatsApp hai bhai 😂
There is a code that historians have to keep in mind “ Don’t try to compare or judge historical figures or individuals to today’s modern understanding of the people’s rights because the conclusion is not fit from any perspective “
People who are interested in or studying history knows that history itself has to be taken with a grain of salt since historically how good or bad the events maybe they still have more sides than what appears on the paper and the understanding of these sides tells more about the situation and the environment of that time period.
Great video 👍
We must not be selective pickers . Tell u what... He is super picky while searching contents of the video and my conclusion is- He's trying to remove few stains of Zihadi rulers by trying to equate them w ancient Hidnu rulers( most of whom had humanity except during political wars ). Look out for Mohak Mangal's research team and sources n I'd need nothing more to say in this. I'm doing Honours in History. I repeat: "He's being totally selective in his content e.g. choosing one bad story from a region in the history of 2500 years and totally ignoring good, humane, kind and generous kings who ruled that place for thousands of years"
@@NeerajMishra03 I know that I’m not that qualified but I still think that even though a king how good or bad but chivalry itself can’t make you a leader sure that we would have respect for them but for an empire to exist it just can’t be formed on chivalry itself.
Labelling them “ Jihadi rulers “ because the action taken by them were cruel but every empire and king will have these exact moments.
And logically speaking I already talked about this in the above comment giving perspective to them is futile.
If you want to continue with this debate I'm right here.
@@NeerajMishra03 ohh C'mon Hindu rulers were barbaric and uncouth as hell
You're just a butthurt person
Ashoka Was Already a BUDDHIST before the KAlinga War.
Bhai log ye mt bhulna is video ki researcher Zaira Khan hai.... Baki tum Samajhdar ho
THANK YOU BRO for opening the eyes of people...I agree Aurangzeb was a cruel king but Akbar ,Sahjahan was complete different,except that time when he used "katl-e-aam".Akbar removed Jajiya for hindus, Made hindu army generals, invited purohit in hi darbaar,Birbal as advisor ,even Mahamati name was given by Hindu kings....Im just trying to say in that time there was no INDIA ,there was individual emperors...so read history as a history, nothing else
Akbar was one of the most brutal king but later god changed like Ashoka (not change his religion but his thinking). Akbar killed Hindus , converted them but later he got changed
@@ruga129totally wrong he was the same till his death evil and cruel .
@@ayushkumar-lr3bvFunny coz u can't accept the truth.
@@abidahaider3406 funny I see you I see him
He did all this not bcoz he loved hindus
He was more of a politician he knew that he would get benefit by doing soo.......he knew that if he would do all this then less people will revolt against him
Conflicts between Vijaynagar Empire and Bahmani Kingdom were so violent that at one campaign Bukka 1 attacked Mudkal(fortress) slaughtered entire garrison incuding men women children and left only one man alive
A small factual correction!
Ashoka didn't accept buddhism after the war. He was already a Buddhist (most probably since 4 years before Kalinga or may be even before) . The story of him converting to buddhism after seeing bloodshed is just made up & has no mentions in any scriptures, all Buddhist manuscripts that talk about ashoka bust this myth. and this just happens to be another romanticized version of history written in NCERT may be to make the story more dramatic. Many experts even attribute his violent actions to his evangelical aspirations to spread buddhism across the subcontinent. But i won't go into the details of that since the purpose of this comment is to simply point out factual inaccuracy in the video.
🙌
Succesfully narrated sanghi propaganda. ..😂
It's all a false information
a small factual correction!
there is nothing called conversion in the dharmic religions,it is an abrahamic concept
one does convert to buddhism ,he/she just practice that way of life be it sanatan,buddhism,jainism etc
Ashram se bahar aa ke ek baar google se history padh lo
wait a sec, does ncert glorify buddhism as most non voilent ,like king see the brutual world and convert into buddhism ,perfect story as it seem and if he was converted into Buddhism before then it was all show off , he didn't understand what buddhism is all about
Yes it is true that Ashoka wanted to patronize Buddhism and wanted to make the entire subcontinent Buddhist, but he could ofcourse not for reasons
Maturity when you realised that "कोई भी राजा दूध का धुला नहीं है"।।
😂😂😂
😂True
Did shivaji also took the same inciative Like other kings
@@AnupamMaurya-qf8kj No Shivaji was not involved in commiting violence against normal citizens but Maratha commanders committed atrocities in west bengal 👍
@@akhileshsingh2216 what I am trying to ask his how was his relations with buddhist and jain
Hindu Raja ache the, hindu Raja ne kabhi galat nahi kiya... Tum mujhe ek bhi example dikha do jisme hindu Raja ne katleam kiya
It is very crucial to learn about history. One can even say that the ugly parts of history are move important to learn.
Your content is great,
you have reasearch lots of things thus why we have a taken a knowledge from you.🙂
As Mohak said, not just Muslim rulers but Hindu rulers too were violent and massacred people mercilessly but nowadays people only wanna target one religion over other. Every one is hero in their own story but villain in others. That's the fact!!
Yes , but Maharana Pratap was not like that
Elaborate Hindu kings ,who did we kill?
@@dubeyrajani4949tm kaha ke raja ho??
@@krishnodas6678उन्होंने 'पाटन की लड़ाई' के बारे में नहीं बताया। यह लड़ाई मराठों और राजपूतों के बीच 20 जून 1790 को हुई थी। मराठों का मुख्य लक्ष्य राजपूताना सहित पूरे उत्तर भारत पर नियंत्रण करना था। इस युद्ध से सिंधिया को पेशवा में अपना प्रभाव बढ़ाने में मदद मिली।
@@dubeyrajani4949Pushyamitra persecution
WHOLE ORIGINAL BUDDHISTS IN BANGLADESH ARE THE LINEAGE OF ORIGINAL BUDDHISTS.
In assam, there are baruas who are NOW HINDU BY FORCED TRANSFORMATION, AND IN BANGLADESH THEY ARE BUDDHISTS.
Furthermore, mutsuddi or singha are in Buddhist religion in Bangladesh
This take a lot a courage. Although I've know almost all fact figures that u've shared (probably much more brutal than that and not to be liked by present society too) sharing impartial history to mass is utmost important. Ignorance, mis information and ill information ignites religious differences and make masses extremely vulnerable to be expoliled by it, which is what happening in present times
We must not be selective pickers . Tell u what... He is super picky while searching contents of the video and my conclusion is- He's trying to remove few stains of Zihadi rulers by trying to equate them w ancient Hidnu rulers( most of whom had humanity except during political wars ). Look out for Mohak Mangal's research team and sources n I'd need nothing more to say in this. I'm doing Honours in History. I repeat: "He's being totally selective in his content e.g. choosing one bad story from a region in the history of 2500 years and totally ignoring good, humane, kind and generous kings who ruled that place for thousands of years"
facts made by who? will never understand people who call themselves factual about history, because history is never factual😂 you all lack common sense, better to forget the past look into the future
@@shivam_nagar69 facts made by stratigraphy, radiometry, thermoluminescene , palaoenology and much more, ask for detailed archaelogical report of kalibangan from respective departments with reason why they don't publish it, eating habits of "proto indians" might ignite some sentimens, u can't ignore everything u don't like, just accept and move forward would be a wiser approach
Ashoka Was Already a BUDDHIST before the KAlinga War.
@@KARAN__SAPRE--------55 yes and buddhist tried to portray this that he chose the dharm of peace which is buddhism .. they were promoting their belief and manipulatig people .. which is why our king's had to kill them and demolish their temples
छत्रपती शिवाजी महाराज इन सबसे अलग राजा थे 🚩
😂
😅
🚩🚩
😂
Bengali people: sure...... 😂
Indian youth needs right direction, you are doing it in the best way possible 👏👏👏
At 20:50 , just look at the name of the researcher
So what?
Btw so what?
😅 Bhai A66a Hua APJ Abdul Sir Tere Mobile Pane Se Pehle Hi Apna Sab Kam Kar Liya Tha
@@MrCool842n this video ....the writer DN JHA a pro leftist and many others .... Abb ess baat se to pta chalta hai ki kya propagate karna chata hai......ess mohak ko jab mahabhart or ramayan ka gyaan nhai hai to......Mention kyun karta hai.....He mention Pandav want's hastinapur by violence.....but real is they want their kingdom Indraprast.......
@@MrCool842abb kal ko to yee mohak ...ramayan pe question karega ....ki Ram bhagwan ko Ravan or raksho ko nhai marna chaiye tha.....vo bhi violence hai....😂😂😂.....Agar war ladenge nhai to dusra tumme mar dega ....just simple
15:00 Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj is one of the few kings in Indian history who consistently fought on the side of justice for the common people (swarajya or self-rule). Unfortunately, many of the later Maratha kings became short-sighted, cruel, and selfish
😂
Brother maratha kings didn't inveded Bengal,
army genaral "Raghoji bhonsle" inveded our two important treding district of Bengal ( Bardhaman and bakura)
And if you go to "Bankura district", their is a famous place in Bisnupur called "Rashmancha"!
People believe "lord Krishna" defeated maratha with canon from this temple
But the real story was local king "Malla" used canons from visnu temple, cause he believed marathas will not attack a temple
Shivaji ki jhoothi hype kyu bana rkha hai be tumlog
Ashoka the great ❤😊
@@Who_09Marathas invaded bengal not one time but 5 time during 1741to 1751. They killed around 4 lakh people during these attacks they even plundered the rajputana and in rajasthan they are called looteras. That's why they rajputs and other indian kings didn't supported Marathas during third battle of Panipat
@@ANONYMOUS-7 bro agar unohne awaj nahi utya hota to aaj tu muslim hi hota aur for kind information he was not against any religion unhone hamesha se sabhi dharmo ko bachane ki koshish hi ki he infact unhe bhi Jat pat ke karran us wakt criticism jhelna pada tha phir bhi unhe keval apne logo ko bachana tha muglo ke atyachar se to yese kehe ke unhe disrespect mat kariye aur jaha bat Ati he ashoka the great ki to unhone bhi kahi katle am kiye he jara history pe nazar dalo phir pata chalega me kisi dharm ke against nahi hu par kam se kam kisi ko disrespect karna galat he chatrapathi shivaji maharaj ki Jay ho 🚩so just respect him and stop spreading faulse prapoganda
Thanks for your efforts ❤❤
one of the most justice giving vidoe on History 👍
Loved it brother 💙
Top level research as a student of history, I'm extremely gald to see such knowledge being shared in a channel with such a large audience. Obrigado Mohank.
correct gald to glad.
All Raja, Maharaja, Kings, Monarchs, Bhrahmins, Priestly Class, Kshytriyas, Shenshah, Knights, Barrons, Vassals, Vaishya, Ulemmas, Maulanas, Rasukhdars, Shahukar, Zamindar, Landlords, Warlords, of all Feudal class of Hindus, Christians, Muslims who are all Extremists in the guise of Religion, man-made God's this Tribes/Clans has all Bloods in their Hands and are killers, murderors has killed Gazillion of Civilians i.e., Farmers, Peasants, Workers & Working class and they are still doing it in 21st century through Economic Exploitation, Inflation, Taxes......
Bhai obrigado ka mtlb ?
As a history student you should be ashamed that this guy is using news articles and analysis articles as historical sources. Delusional lmao
You are truly gald
Lesson - Never Idealise any king irrespective of their religion, and stay away from Political agendas based on religion and history 🙏
You are right fools should stay away from politics anyway😂
L take , don't support any party cause all have one inclined bias for specific religion... even Never vote Evm machine are hacked ...
Never eat cause u are gonna poop , just suicide cause u are gonna die.
I like your content without any biasness , so much to learn❤
correction: Bhagwan shri Krishna Yudhishtra se hastinapur lene ke liye isliye kahte he kyuki yudhistra ko already hastinapur ka yuvraj bana diya gya tha. Yuvraj matlab raja ke baad vohi raja banega. Already promises ho gya tha ki yudhishtra se ki bhai tumhara he. Iss time war hone ki baat hi nhi thi. To fact theek karo aur fir video banao.Thank you
Respect for CHHATRAPATI SHIVAJI increase by billion times..
4:20 my answer was ''Shahrukh Khan'' ??
7 crore😅
@@gmd2455 😂😂
Amazing...this is what we called a video without any bias....
Hi aap bhuat qut ho
👏 salute to you for the awesome content ❤️
Keep it up...
Correction: The use of iron tools to clear forests to create agricultural land is believed to have started from 1200 BCE - 1000 BCE, not the 6th century BCE because by that time most Mahajanpads and Janpads were already well established in the Gangetic valley from Kuru in modern day Haryana till Anga and Vanga in modern day Bengal and Bangladesh.
Fun fact : Ashoka embraced Buddhism before Kalinga war.😭
The biasness towards left is quite visible mohak.
Maybe it's made up story but Mohak should have included it as he did for others.
He accepted Buddhism after Kalinga war.
Hinduism made him Violent
It is good only na he was actually saved ! So get los hindutva
@@jioboy2.071 bruh seriously , ab tu ye likhega fir 4 log tujhe gaali denge , fir tu unko dega , low class primate thread bn jayegi , people become good or bad cuz of how they were nurtured , religion is just a part of it , extreme biasness towards any of the elements can lead to unfortunate events
@@jioboy2.071 it not u saying its your religion .
Long Story Short:
Almost every king was cruel.
Andhbhakts Be Like: Oye Tune Hamare *hindu* logo pe comment kya me tujhe maar dalunga omg lmao
Read the comments carefully before replying
YOU SHOULD HAVE INCLUDED RULING QUEENS TOO! WHY ONLY KINGS? THERE WERE MANY RULING QUEENS TOO
there was also this difference between the islamic rulers and indian rulers that they were foreign and they invaded india and did what they did. India was not their country.Why do people forget this simple and the most important point while comparing the two.We Indians have all the right to hate on Ghori,Ghazi,the Sultans,the Mughals,the Britishers and every other invader who invaded India and tried to mould India for their own gains.If someone breaks into your house and starts living with you and becomes the head of the family and you cannot do anything about it because he is more powerful at the moment.While his stay,he repairs some sections of your house and gives you food.But none of this will ever make him good in your perception.
There was no concept of country before 1947. There were only kingdoms. Some kingdoms extended up to Iran, will you call that our country?
Just brilliant. This should be shown in all schools at start of the academic year in all class rooms. As some one famously said - Selective history is not history, it’s political ideology.
He actually did that you mentioned in your last sentence.
@@hitesh8512Do you know about battle of Patan?
@@hitesh8512 oh did he!! I heard it for the first time from Pakistani Historian Ishtiaq Ahmad in one of the Lallantop videos.
@@hitesh8512 you won't agree with facts cuz you may be andhbhakt
@@daviddiveroli9331 and u andhnamazi 😂😂😂
thank you so much for such a great information
Just a minor correction, Ashoka had converted to Buddhism approximately 2 years before the Kalinga war and no Buddhist text relates his conversion to a war. But yes, the Kalinga war did inspire him to rule with peace and stability rather than conquest and massacre.
Honestly, I find it quite strange how they've decided to trim down the chemistry syllabus too. They claim that topics such as the periodic table, which are crucial for younger students, are merely about memorization.
Edit: read the last line too, I acknowledge that it is rote learning. It is also slightly irrelevant for Commerce/Arts pursuing students.
But knowing the concepts builds interests.
Andhnamazis attendance 👇
Chemistry syllabus has been made specific....for science students only and periodic table.will be taught in class 11th science.....i am science PG and I studied periodic table in class 11 in congress ruled state... so dont fall for political propaganda. Because the govt which promoting quantum computing cannot ban periodic table.
I think the syllabus change is only for 1 year
Also evolution in biology
And evolution which is the basic concept crucial to general knowledge
This was not only in India but all over the world there were several battles , several empires rise and fall but after the 20 century these vilotions of kings have stopped
The King who fought for *truth* he is great.
Mohak Bhai apne itihas ki bahut achi jankari di hai , iske liye apko thank you 🙂🙏🏻
I have personally read Upinder Singh's books and can vouch that they are very detailed and informative highly recommend them if you want to learn more about ancient and early Medieval history in detail.
Edit: For anyone curious I have read "A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India" by Pearson. It's not cheap tho so I suggest you could find a pdf on it online.
Please name of that book???
Showing violence without mentioning the reasons is an act of fraud, and this video was full of that. I can write a whole book explaining the stupidity done in this childish act. However, one scene that affected me was the usage of the Ramayana clip, the clip of the slicing of the nose of Ravana's sister. I understand the point you wanted to touch on, but this video shows that you need to learn about history; please take help from professors.
@@bxseries1085Battle of Patan Ncert book me nhi Diya hai. Online padna padha.
We must not be selective pickers . Tell u what... He is super picky while searching contents of the video and my conclusion is- He's trying to remove few stains of Zihadi rulers by trying to equate them w ancient Hidnu rulers( most of whom had humanity except during political wars ). Look out for Mohak Mangal's research team and sources n I'd need nothing more to say in this. I'm doing Honours in History.
@@NeerajMishra03you have to much time to write this on every comment having a degree in history.
Misleading & selective.
1. Ashoka was a Buddhist before Kalinga war.
2. Violence was the norm of ancient & mediaeval period, but in this video the instances have been selectively used to portray that violence was used for religious reasons in the pre-islamic era.
3. The thumbnail itself shows Maharaj Krishna Dev Raya as Ashoka.
4. Pushyamitra wasn't the last Hindu ruler of that region, yet the saachi stupa still exists, pointing to the fact that there was bare minimum religious violence before Islamic rule.
5. Most of the references given here are of D. N. Jha, who is a well known leftist historian (distorian). Point is not about him being leftist, point is about only showing the leftist POV which in a way creates a confirmation bias.
6. Last but not the least, it's the oldest technique of subversion where along with 4 facts one misleading information is shown so that it appears as a fact to slowly subvert the audience for a particular agenda.
Then again, I'm hopeful many viewers here are responsible enough that they'll do more research before believing in anything shown above, that's the best way to ensure you're not misled. Mohak here is a good creator, but even he can't always be correct.
True Majority Indians haven't read their own history so it's easy to manipulate
It's all about religion , if today India was a Buddhist nation.. Hindu religion would be treated like Buddhism or Jainism..
Ancient India had a power struggle between Hinduism Buddhism Jainism that's the fact.. even in Hinduism shaivaites vaishnavites or many such sects..
Today we are majority hindu nation and hence we defend it
Or if India would have been Islamic nation,then they would have portrayed Hindus as villains or justified Islamic rule like Pakistan does...
Awsmmm bhai...u r right✌️🙏🙏🇮🇳🇮🇳🚩🚩
About point two. The purpose was to show that there are number of cases where violence occurred in the name of religion in pre Islamic times and not excusively after islamic invasion. That was the purpose. So I don't see that as a negative/criticism.
Now if your criticism is to say that more religion based killings ouccred after Islamic rule then it is going to be difficult. For that one has to scour through many source pre Islamic invasion and post Islamic invasion. Then there is many other issues like what is a religion based killing in the context of the study, likelihood of sources being poorer quality or less in number as we go further back in time and missing information. By the time he lists all those examples pre Islamic invasion and post Islamic invasion the video will be hours long.
In history, you need to select sources to prove your point. You must obviously show the alternative viewpoint too but there is limit to how long the argument can be.
@@RMatt2016 ✌️🙏
Plz make detailed individual videos on each of them
Seeing the reality of these kings, it makes feel even more that how open minded Maharaja Ranjit Singh Ji was. He never forced anyone from other religion to convert into a Sikh. He gave religious freedom to everyone. He showed equality for everyone.
That’s y Chhatrapati Shivaji and Maharana Pratap is celebrated as compared to other rulers …
Correct me if I am wrong , they were the real example of how a king should be
Right .....
Jay shivray ❤ shivaji mhaaraj the only king jisme sari praja sukhi thi fir koi bhi caste ho ya religion janta raja ❤ ( jantecha raja )
@@StellaratorAIhe was talking about chhatrapati shivaji maharaj rule not maratha empire rule
100% right, I was about to comment the same thing
Both Maharana Pratap and Shivaji Maharaj were loved by their people's and today also they are inspiration, because they never committed any crime against the local civillians to prove their authority, they proved their authority by protecting their people's, by inspiring later generations, by respecting women's ❤
Um get your facts right bro
Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj is an exception to this he is greatest Indian king
Great vedio you taught the Great lesson to the youth ....i appreciate your efforts ❤️
Your videos are truly beautiful because you telling the truth
And justify everyone as they all where equal
0:36 pushyamitra shunga? He persecuted Buddhists while the previous magadhan rulers preached buddhism
Chakravartin Samrat Ashoka - The Great 🔥👑☸️
It has been proved that Violent hindu kings combined with arrival of Islam led to the decline of Buddhism from india. That's why Buddhists are not even 0.5% in india but majority in Neighboring Bhutan, Myanmar
Hey how can you expect a person from aligarh muslim University to tell truth....they will ofc say hindu kings were bad ....and mughals were great ......tell history from historical perspective not from today's media
Bro but all his arguments were just logical fax
@@bredbutter on what basis you are saying bro....learn to check facts not opinion
@@jyotirmayartzthey lie to us Ashoka was buddist before attacking Kalinga
how coluld you say anythning wrong aout lord krishna, if someone attacks your sister what will you do.