If you like what you see and want to stay up to date with Dad Saves America, please subscribe here on TH-cam or over on Substack, where you can find weekly articles and the audio version of the podcast, with more to come in the near future! www.dadsavesamerica.com
leftism: Otherwise known as “progressivism” and even more inaccurately as “liberalism”, leftism is a term originating from the French Revolution of 1789, in reference to the political faction that opposed the French (so-called) king. However, the term is currently used in common discourse to describe those criminals who actively support (or at least tacitly condone) a host of OBJECTIVELY-WICKED ideologies and practices that contravene dharma, such as non-monarchical governances and corrupt economic systems (particularly socialism, communism, fascism, and liberal democracies), egalitarianism, feminism, perverse sexuality (especially homosexuality, bestiality, and transvestism), multiculturalism, and the illegitimate abortion of innocent, defenceless, unborn children. Cf. “dharma”. In a vain attempt to legitimize their objectively-immoral propensities, leftists invariably replace accurate terms with blatant EUPHEMISMS, such as “gay”, “sex worker”, “pro-choice”, and “queer”, and of course, coin novel words for notions that cannot exist, particularly the nonsensical term, “transgender”. Furthermore, leftists are constantly inventing truly inane, vacuous words to demonize conservatives, such as “homophobia” and “transphobia” (which literally mean “fear of sameness” and “fear of change”, respectively). In the past decade or two (of this treatise being composed), the mass media, especially the motion picture industry and television production companies, has been aggressively promoting all the above CRIMINAL ideologies and practices, helping to expedite the destruction of human civilization. Recently, large corporations have jumped on the leftist bandwagon (so to speak), in order to profit. As explicated in Chapter 11 of this “A Final Instruction Sheet for Humanity”, the state of being of any particular human (or any other animal, for that matter) is due entirely to his or her genetic sequencing and his or her conditioning. Therefore, the explosion of the leftist/liberal mentality in recent decades, particularly in Western countries, has been caused by poor breeding strategies overtaking the more conservative tradition of mate-selection of previous centuries (and indeed, millennia), as well as the concerted effort of Marxists to spread their nefarious ideology throughout the school system. In other words, due to the fact that criminal behaviour (especially the deviant sexual acts mentioned above) has become increasingly more tolerated, condoned, and even GLORIFIED in most countries, there has been a proliferation of corrupt genetic codes within the wider human population. According to genealogists, for (almost) the entire history of humanity, most women have successfully reproduced, whilst a far far smaller percentage of males have bequeathed their genetic sequence to proceeding generations. Due to the gradual phasing-out of polygamous marriages in even the most conservative societies, as well as the eradication of poverty in most every country, more and more men (as well as women) have been producing offspring. Thus, the human genome has rapidly become adulterated by inferior genetic material (that is, DNA from truly pathetic, uxorious beta-males, bisexuals, and even homosexual couples who engage surrogate mothers or sperm donors in order to conceive children - something of a rare occurrence in previous centuries/millennia). For centuries, breeders of elite animals such as horses, cattle, and dogs, have known that selecting the finest examples of a breed of animal will result in offspring with desirable characteristics. For example, present day thoroughbred horses boast a pedigree of the best-available horses from the seventeenth century. Such breeders are willing to pay enormous sums of money merely to hire the fastest stallions on earth in order for them to mate with their mares. In the case of we humans, women have traditionally chosen the most competent and masculine men with whom to bear children, and in general, have totally eschewed those males who displayed effeminate traits, and who showed themselves incapable of properly supporting a nuclear family. Unfortunately, due to rapid moral decay over the past few decades, Western women have become extremely sexually promiscuous, resulting in a multiplication of unwanted progeny (and, of course, an escalation of abortions). Boys born to single mothers often lack proper male role models and invariably become feminized, unable (and often unwilling) to continue a strong lineage of progenitors. The solution to this problem is simply to ensure that society adheres to the principles of DHARMA (see the Glossary definition of that term, as well as Chapter 12). Unsurprisingly, the majority of leftists find it difficult to accept the fact that their criminal mentality is largely inherited (and of course, they are unwilling to acknowledge the blatantly-obvious fact that their ideologies and practices are intrinsically sinful, wicked, evil and immoral in the first place!). It seems the consensus amongst leftist “intellectuals” is that every human mental trait is due entirely to one’s environmental conditioning and social milieu, rather than as a consequence of BOTH one’s genetic sequence and one’s life-long conditioning - a fundamentally-flawed assertion that cannot be scientifically supported. I would not be surprised if the typical leftist would believe that, if the parents of the twentieth century communist tyrant, Joseph Stalin, and the parents of the Divine Incarnation, Lord Jesus Christ, had somehow crossed the time barrier, and exchanged their baby boys shortly after their births, that Stalin would have grown to become a Prophet for God, whilst Christ would have become a murderous, left-wing dictator! This term was very reluctantly used in the chapter on feminism. I say “reluctantly” because it is unlikely that the term will perdure for many decades longer. This is simple deductive logic, since, as clearly demonstrated in certain chapters in “F.I.S.H”, human civilization cannot survive with such leftist practices and ideologies in place. If you happen to be reading this Holy Scripture a century or more after its conception, you will probably be residing in a nation (as opposed to a country) ruled by a monarch, following the implosion of post-modern, decadent societies. So, either the term “leftism” will eventually become redundant and obsolete, or else, human civilization will devolve into a decadent, diseased state of existence similar to that of the prehistoric era, when the peoples of the world resided in caves or shacks, subsisting on whatever food can be sourced from the surrounding bushland. I trust that you who are reading these wise words will endeavour to influence your social circles to adhere to right-leaning ideologies and practices, such as (above all) monarchical governance, an entirely free-market economy, sexual purity, veganism, and all other virtuous principles. Fear not, for God is with you! P.S. As a general rule, it seems (at least anecdotally) that the farther left-leaning is a person, the more physically (and of course, psychologically) UGLY is that person. Unfortunately, that does not seem to prevent leftists from propagating their mutant genes.🤡 N.B. In order to clarify the notion of inheritability, it is not being claimed that an adharmic (far-left) couple will INVARIABLY produce leftist children, but that it is more PROBABLE that they will do so, considering their genetic sequence and the environmental conditioning they are bound to impart to their children, just as two parents with a certain physiological disorder are more likely to generate offspring with that specific disease. In this regards, it is recommended to study introductory texts on epigenetics. 🧬 In my particular case, I was raised by a staunch communist, and so, was indoctrinated to believe that communism was the best course of action for a just society. Indeed, as a teenager, I even volunteered in the election campaign of a socialist politician, who eventually became the Premiere of the state of Western Australia. However, after studying dharma, I came to learn that I was misled by my father in this regard, and that the only system of governance that is dharmic (legitimate) is a divinely-sanctioned monarchy.
I get it. However, there are plenty of micro houses, trailer homes, foreclosures well under 100k. You just have to be willing to live outside of urban areas. I'm just trying to help and offer solution most people don't think of.
Work hard for 5 years and you can buy a tiny house (aka a shed). Or start a business & get access to that business lending capital & you can make things move pretty quick financially if you have the right business idea.
Well, one does have to work their buns off to save money, and be able to invest. That is if you don't get an inheritance. 😯 My idea. Put even a little bit of money in an investment while young. Get a Roth account, there are small investments you can build. Keep building it. Save, save, save your money. Do your research. Take a class whatever. A successful life takes work, and making good decisions. What kind of life do you want to lead? What kind of fulfillment? The best thing to do is make decisions for yourself that make you happy in a deeper way. That sounds obvious, but making the right decisions is huge. Right decisions about career, jobs, money, the right life partner, etc. Don't settle, or think it's impossible.
I’m a 25 year old man. It really bothers me how much what Rudyard says resonates with me. I want him to be wrong so bad, and then he describes my life perfectly and I’m like “f*ck” every time
38 m here. He's correct 💯. But, you young 🌱 men should benefit from the generational churn. As the Boomers die of old age, they will yield their remaining assets (housing yay!) and the Millennials will become the big voting block. Millennials in our then 40s will be completely "through the chute" but you will benefit more from the churn. Your labor will be more valuable. Just don't get into student debt w an English major like many Millennials did. Also, invest. Americans get rich off investments, not wages. (BUY THE VOO)
I’m 47 Was madly in love and had a wonderful first 15 years of marriage. The last 5 have been real tough (1) if you get married get a prenup (2) if you have kids don’t give them an iPad till 16 (3) recommend you save 50% of salary and invest in a business (~100k laundromat) (4) you’ll be a millionaire when 35. At 35 get your passport and marry an Eastern European girl Do not marry a western woman (5) I think I’m going to be able to stay married but only because I make $170j per year and take a lot of shit (6) I’m not sure what happened but women in USA have gone completely insane
This is why I was excited to have him on. I'm clearly out of touch with what you guys are going through in this world. As I said in the convo, I feel like I caught the last chopper out of Vietnam. But I want to find a way to be helpful. That's actually what this channel is all about.
@@DadSavesAmerica I make well over 100k in california and I still barely can save money at 41. Thank God I am at a company with a 401k match otherwise retirement would be completely out of the question. I cringe for my toddlers future. Because we are barely making it.
I normally don’t do this multiple posting but the “just stick it out” moment got me. I ran a whole damn department, taught myself to code, saved the company thousands of dollars, played by the rules for TEN YEARS. Ten years!!!! I didn’t make enough to even remotely come close to being able to own a home and then was fired. This is the out of touch view even gen x has. I Work my ass off just for myself just to barely scrape by. I was richer in purchasing power working min wage in high school than I am now.
So.. then.. your point is that YOUR disposition is the example that the guest uses to make the argument that people will become unhinged to the point of open violence?
Fellow coder here. If you’re not working anyway, consider cutting expenses to the bone and doing a startup. What have you got to lose? Move where the cost of living is low (or go van life), pick up some side contracts on Upwork to pay the bills, and put in ridiculous hours. That’s (almost) the same path that I’m on.
I understand your problem man I've been in a depression for a long time lost a job of 16 years due to alcoholism. Multiple posts are necessary to complete the picture
Glad to see Rudyard getting all this attention lately from different content creators. He’s really knowledgeable about history (my favorite subject in high school) and he’s just great to listen to
I find conversations with people on the spectrum are actually really good. They answer a question directly, they don't varnish or sugar coat or worry about how other people see them. They're like spock. I find it refreshing. "Does my bum look big in this" ?.... "Yes".
Your wife being braver than you doesn't mean women aren't less risk adverse. It means you are less risk adverse than other men at worst, or you are pandering to your wife at best.
@@arkhost224 How do you know he hasn’t in the past? In my opinion, American women, single, married, wealthy, poor, etc., are all very difficult in today’s world in America.
@@GregoryArkadin-j5v Did you not like, watch any of the interview? The counterarguments that he tosses out are so out of touch with reality that it's intentional obstanance. Even granting the "devil's advocate" angle, it's so off base as to convey that he simply lives in a different reality.
I had Rudyard on our show and spent the time and money to produce and present this because: 1. you're totally correct that I'm a Gen-Xer who's out of touch with the world you all are dealing with to some extent, and... 2. I actually really fucking care about you people because I have an almost 20 year old son who's confronting the same fucked world and would rather our country not collapse. Pushing back and playing devil's advocate is fair game, my friends. Rudyard's smart enough to joust and I came away even more impressed with his thinking than before.
Absolutely! Terrorist organizations the world over are filled with young men who had no hope for the future and no prospects at having a wife and children. That's a big part of why ISIS was appealing to young men because it promised them adventure, an outlet for their aggression and a wife. Also as far as I can tell pretty much every mass shooter did not have a girlfriend or a wife. It's just hard to ruminate and get carried away on dangerous ideas for days and days at a time when you have a woman who comes to see you or lives with you.
Absolutely! Terrorist organizations the world over are filled with young men who had no hope for the future and no prospects at having a wife and children. That's a big part of why isis was appealing to a young men because it promised them adventure, an outlet for their aggression and a wife. Also as far as I can tell pretty much every mass shooter did not have a girlfriend or a wife. It's just hard to ruminate and get carried away on dangerous ideas for days and days at a time when you got a woman who comes to see you or lives with you.
This Dad dude is just like a chick. When someone makes a point in generalities, which is necessary to make decisions, he immediately says, “well not my wife. “.
"Low level jobs actively punish those who have agency." As someone who's been at the bottom since my first job, I can completely confirm that this is very true. If you have initiative a manager will punish you. If you meet your quota they will tell you to keep working and increase your quota over time. If you are one of the top performers and very productive but have one low productivity day, all they do is give you hate for not being great on that one day. If you are caught talking you will be scolded, but the managers and CEO's visiting will always just stand around and talk about sports, whoever is hot, and endlessly give you a double standard. Only office workers and management can slack off and chat with each other. Low level jobs also suck so much because management actively abuse and mistreat workers at the bottom.
True, but that's how the hierarchy works. The people at the bottom are needed less for the work they do, but for being the punching bags for the ones above.
@@nocturnaljoe9543that's completely backwards. The people at the bottom are needed the most! Every manager at the factory I work at could take the day off and work would still get done. But if all the workers took the day off.....chaos. It's just that we're easily replaceable.
@@nocturnaljoe9543 It seems the workers support the non-productive higher ups. Because the middle mangers and upper managers don't do most of the work. And the CEOs only make 4 good decisions per year. (Jeff Bezos) So do you mean to say the low level workers are paid just to get abused and ordered around?
That's why you only do the bare minimum. Lying and manipulating them works too. Also don't forget to take some inventory to make up for all their bs. You can also make your bosses job difficult. Put wrenches in his stuff. Then get fired and laugh at them in front of your colleagues. Or quit yourself and make a scene making management look dumb. There are options.
"you can make 100k driving a truck" .............no you cannot , that's a theory the actual practice is you go 5k to 10k for training then go to work driving making 40k and that doesn't change for years
Exactly, there are those driving positions...most drivers are not making that much. "Pro baseball players are making millions a year!" True but the majority of pro baseball players are in the minor leagues barely making more than a service worker on minimum wage.
I have yet to find a 100k a year job but I am also not willing to sleep in a truck for weeks or months away from my family. You can do it though. I make 75 to 80k and sleep in my bed every night.
This is why I always hated listening to megachurch men and motivational types. They say something about the rare person who makes it big, then acts like anyone who doesn't make it just didn't believe XYZ hard enough.
100k is doable IF you own your own truck. But driving for a company is ~50k starting, you're away from home for weeks at a time and now they all have cameras in the cab. No thanks.
Not being able to express excitement or being happy is so true. At my 7 year olds soccer game I cheered too loud for her and my wife hushed me. She legitimately felt embarrassed that i was rooting for my daughter to win a soccer game.
@@orimoreau3138 Sounds like the US has become the UK. We've been like that forever. American enthusiasm/positivity was always seen as embarrassing to be around, but secretly we admired it. If you genuinely lose that, you will lose an important part of your identity. Don't let it happen.
@faustoferrari4303 dang, this is sad but so true. It just hit me how soulcrushing it can be to self censor or modulate genuine emotional expression at the behest of (probably forced) social "norms"
@@LateNightRewrites Well put!! But it amused me that the way you express it, with the underlying excitement at your realisation is so American. Keep it up.
Tbf it has always been a part of British culture to be as unmoved by emotion as possible, ‘stiff upper-lip’ culture might not be as prominent or spoken of now but it exists through our society in how we still look down at others who are very expressive like Americans and Italians as weird.
The Great Depression wasn't just caused by the stock market crash. There was a huge drought in the 1930s that made a lot of farmers go bankrupt and caused food shortages.
It wasn't a drought. It was a "dust bowl". That dust bowl happened because the farmers had cleared the land in preparation for planting, then went to the banks to obtain a farming loan, were not granted the necessary loan, and that land then sat there, dried up due to lack of covering vegetation and became sand and dust. The farmers weren't granted loans exactly because of the depression, which was caused by the 1913 Federal Reserve Act, and the larger banks attempted to kill all of the small banks who previously refused to sell out to the larger banks. So, yes, the 1929 market crash was intentionally caused by the banks in 1920-25, which the Federal Reserve Act was supposed to prevent. It was a con job between the banks and the politicians.
@@dreamingmusic3299 Fair enough. I should have been more precise. I think there were droughts that contributed to the dust bowl conditions at the time though, at least in western Canada where I'm from. I heard so much about the horrible drought of the 1930s from my relatives who were children at the time.
Rudy makes too many undeclared assumptions. He assumes people are stupid because they started a war and lost it. Meanwhile, he wants people not to be cowards... he will call them stupid when they act on their courage and lose. Rudy.... embrace the right wing and get in line, stop being stupid and coward.
As a European who came to America for a better life ... when Obama was elected I seriously started researching many other countries as alternatives. And realized there aren't any. It's generally worse everywhere else. This is it fellas, we have to defend our freedoms.
Yup. People talk about fleeing the country. And go where exactly? The rest of the modern world is suffering from the same things that America is except even worse. There's nowhere else to go. This is home and we have to fight the globalists for our country.
While I am getting my Italian dual-citizenship, and love the country at a genetic level, I'm afraid that America is indeed the best we've got overall, for all its problems. We can't let it be destroyed by communists.
The plight of young men can be explained in a small example within my romantic relationship. My partner doesn’t seem to take what I say seriously until I express anger. I don’t want to express myself through anger, but that seems to be the only way my message is received.
I resonate with this deeply. I'm a calm man by nature. But at some point I realised that no one takes me seriously unless I become outwardly angry and aggressive. No matter the relationship, friend, lover, housemates, colleagues, no one will do anything I ask or take my concerns seriously unless I show anger. Then they'll actually do something.
Same here. Its all about leverage unfortunately. When I'm serious I say, "I'm not asking you, I'm telling you". But I own the house property, car etc so I can afford to do it.
I have a chemical engineering degree, and masters in micro and nano technology, and basically finished my PhD, I have applied for about 200 jobs, and gotten nothing. I dont believe in DEI, I dont complain about my personal life, I am basically begging for any form of employment, I have a good strong work ethic, healthy, and multidisciplinary education. Yes some people are bad workers, but even good workers struggle to find jobs that fit them, the job market in western countries is saturated with workers due to immigration, technology has helped eliminate other jobs. Employer's often "fish" for employees throwing back many while falsely saturating the job offer space. And the baby boomers are working long into retirement instead of retiring, because they screwed up the economy and are poor now.
Baby boomers didn't destroy the economy. Politicians did. It wasn't baby boomers who decided to ship jobs overseas. They were affected by it too. The only difference is that they had a head start, and were able to purchase homes while they were still affordable. So they have some equity to play with. Young people don't have homes, or even job prospects.
@@nerychristian Well, at least in theory, in a democracy it's the people who vote the politicians in. And it's not politicians who owned all the businesses that did the outsourcing
Yeah because the society has repeatedly told us they hated us our entire lives ofc we'd rather hurt the government and beuroctacies than some foreign army that has done nothing to us
John.. I knew at one point you would have Rudyard on. This young man's ideas, theories, are very thought-provoking & this is the discourse we need to have in this country. Whether you agree or disagree with his ideas they are intriguing. Thank you for having him on! Bravo!
I listen to him simply b/c he does intriguing, and thought provoking material. However, I do think he is way off the mark in two areas: Either not enough, or not at all focused on the folks at the top running the show, and the religious-spiritual arena. Make no mistake, there IS a global hierarchy that has been in play for quite some time, definitely many decades, but i'd say centuries (for millennia ?! Im not in a position to know that, let alone answer it) that stays in the shadows, so to speak. There is a "supernatural" aspect to all of this, call it what you will: divine prophesy, divine intervention, etc. Of course this is VERY HARD to "nail down" for obvious reasons. Its hard, if not impossible for atheists, and/or those that a very hard leaning "scientific mind" to grasp. (I did have the SM, but was able to "open new doors" so to speak, which allowed me to see things from yet another important perspective).
He has read a lot of books, but his conclusions are all drawn on vibes and "gut feelings." It sounds thought-provoking and is great for clicks on youtube but he's not the serious intellectual he tries to sell himself as. There are so many flaws in his methodology.
@@Easttowest45They’re drawn from the base of knowledge he attained through reading specialists and he forms hypothesis then tries to knock them down. Try listening harder.
@@Lalapizzle way too much steering and re-directing. Won't let the interviewee finish a thought to completion without chiming in. It's almost as if he's the one who secretly wants to be interviewed. And he tries too hard to connect to his guest, which is not the point of an interview. It's not a bonding session. Plus the title turned out to be click bait as he never really let his guest get to the heart of it. He doesn't know how to listen and help the guest expand on things, just goes to the next prepared question. It means he doesn't really listen. And his hair is cringe. And he talks like his wife beats him up. Ugh.
Rudi makes too many undeclared assumptions. He assumes people are stupid because they started a war and lost it. Meanwhile, he wants people not to be cowards... you will call them stupid when they act on their courage and lose. Rudy.... embrace the right wing and get in line, stop being stupid and coward.
The job situation in the US actually is somewhat of a zero sum game. Why? Licensure hellscape. Civil Engineering, teaching, Nursing, MD's, police, firemen, plumbing, etc....all licensure jobs and many positions that are filled mostly by governments. Get rid of licensure to fix it...also limit patents to five years max since you're at it.
You don't even have to completely remove a patent after 5 years. Just require whoever uses the patent to pay the patent owner like 5% from whatever they make using the patent. That way the patent owner still gets compensated, but the idea is free to use who can make a profit with a 5% handicap.
5 year patents don't work in most cases. Government reviews and SOP take longer than that. Typical time to market for industry probably averages 5 years. Think of every thing from drug testing, crash testing cars & EPA regs, airplanes, pretty long list. The patent is applied early in the process so you don't suffer from industrial spying, employees going to competitors.
@@geoffgjof If you could get it to work that way. Problems are things like the company you work for considers it "a work for hire" so the actual inventor sees nothing special. One of the first things the company using the patent does is see if there is anyway around paying royalties i.e. prior art, false claims, that kind of stuff. I know of one guy who was "California Inventor of the Year" that was eventually forced out of his position as Senior VP in charge of R&D for amoug other things, stealing subordinates inventions and passing them off as solely his. Just saying, it's tough to get a system that isn't exploitable in some fashion. I mean one of my supervisors stole an idea from a summer intern and when confronted about it said "it isn't the person who came up with it, it's the person who files tge first invention record!"
@@Gizziiusaeither way there are certain preparations we can make to increase our odds. I can't believe no one around me is taking ANY steps to prepare lol
Same at 51. I feel like these are the conversations, I get shushed to not talk about because it's "too devicive." So I go back to posting cat and dog videos. The world is becoming so boring!
I mean he does do a lot of throwing spaghetti at the wall and seeing what sticks but he called 9/11 like a freaking psychic. Like 3 to 6 months before it happened and he specifically said Osama was going to do it and It would be the world trade center. It was so spot I would be surprised at the FBI didn't knock on his door asking him how he had that for knowledge.
You've hear the expression: "take it with a grain of salt". When it comes to Alex Jones, take everything with a shovelful of salt. You have to wade through so much BS to get to that tiny bit of truth, it makes him an untrustworthy source of sensationalistic ramblings, unfortunately. But I agree with Rudyard and "Dad", he does occasionally get it right....
The women in charge of HR, or female bosses are just rejecting good males... they are so hate-driven and abusive. They abuse women too but women are more likely to put up with abuse, and women bosses abuse males far more. If they can't abuse males, they'll just reject them and make them unemployed... meanwhile "there is a hiring crisis". YAEH SURE YOUR HR HIRERS ARE RETARDED and destroying everything.
That's one of many rationalizations I've seen people post online both side's. It's hard to gage how serious most truly are the number's are worrisome though.
@@LiberatingamericansSeriously in just the last days I've taken note of people on both sides shouting down their own dissenting voices these are voices that are absolutely aligned with their sides but can't criticize their own the civil war will be between each sides own extremes or at least that's where it starts to catch on fire
Both parties are responsible for the destruction of our nation. Democrats have destroyed the nation domestically, the Republicans have destroyed us overseas with constant wars for Israel
@@andrewamos3880 Hello im from the future. I can prove it: In the future everyone is stupid and gay. Ok now that you see im serious, Kamala "wins" the election and a civil war takes place that will be instigated by Russia, or so they say. All Trump supporters will be rounded up and forced to choose between the noose or becoming trans to mark your undying support for the Democratic party.
Rudyard is someone I have been waiting for years to show up... He is not afraid to expect the worst outcome, to predict pessimistically, he is not one of the 99% that wear pink-color eyeglasses that tell them 'everything is gonna be alright' and 'mama-state will take care of you', he is not afraid to make an error, to evolve his thinking... A regular champion of the people and a fearless person.
On the contrary, I see this as a different perspective on Rudyard where he gets to answer some critical questions. I don't really trust people until they show they can survive some friendly broiling, so this interview does the job for me.
Rudyard's made the rounds and we know each other outside of podcast land, so I opted for a more devil's advocate approach rather than simply having him repeat himself. It was a little annoying at parts, I admit, upon revisiting it and listening.
@@DadSavesAmericawell, most of us don't know any of you from outside the podcast world. You keep on superimposing your own perspective on every point instead of giving leeway to the interviewee to make his point completely.
While I think the interviewer formulated them sometimes badly and in cringy way, at the same time he's supposed to ask for arguments that support guest's theories, since without arguments theories are useless
Rudyard makes a CRUCIAL mistakes in his talk about "Nazi apologists." I know a number of young men who would be called as such, and each one has said the same thing to me. "I do not want to be making these arguments. I take no pleasure in having to say that Nazism or Fascism had "positives." I have been forced into making these arguments because I have been given only one alternative: my, my family's, my society's, and my history's complete and utter obliteration. I have been left with exactly two options, and I will choose the one that does not actively seek to destroy me at this moment." None of these young men WANT this. (String pullers are another argument) They have been given no other choice. This is exactly the same thing that happened in Weimar Germany. Millions of young men had to choose: Do I allow my civilization, my link to all that has ever happened, be destroyed by groups that actively scream it should be so and that my very existence is evil. Or, do I commit atrocities I know are terrible in the slim chance that I am able to maintain said existence and civilization. Tell me you would not have done the same thing, I will call you a poor liar.
I started listening to him when he was a 13 year old TH-camr. He never showed his face in his videos so I had no idea he was only 13. He was wise beyond his years even then.
@@dogeared100The problem with people like you, you know, feminists. You take the 1% of any category and broad brush apply to all men. In Rudyard's case, how many 23 year olds have the depth of knowledge and insight he has? Very few, practically none. So you use this as a way to dismiss him, because it takes most people significantly longer to have even a basic grasp of anything. Rudyard is not bound by your normieism.
Feminism is largely responsible for one person not being able to support a family as it nearly doubled the supply of labor while the demand for labor remained more or less the same.
I think it was Lenin who said the middle classes will be crushed by the hammer of taxes on the anvil of inflation. Behold the present. 2) Steven Pinker says it's never been better for humanity than now 😮
@@thealienelite yeah, it was Lauren. She was starstruck with him at first but then his creepy stalking became apparent and she got away and talked publicly about it, and Stefan hasn't really been seen since. I mean that's not true but the algorithm hates him now
Jesus Chirst John is such a New Yorker. He thinks that new york is the whole fucking world so if it didn't happen in new york it didn't happen anywhere else jesus.
Yeah and he must be 50+ or close to it. What does he mean when he says “I’m almost old enough to be your dad”. Such a privileged urbanite thing to say.
@@banjiman9869 If someone is laying out points and historical evidence for something and you only rebuttal is well While I was leaving in New York I was able to make a living there for the system works. You aren't playing devils' advocate you are being delusional. If he was really worried about his son he would look at the evidence and say "While i dont like/agree with what they is implying it holds merit and I should prepare my son for this possible outcome." Because I don't want my son coming back and saying "Dad you were given a heads up on this and instead of preparing me you ignored it and now that it's happening I am unprepared and can't really handle it now I have to struggle to get through it because you rejected what was in front of you." Rejecting reality because you don't like how it makes you feel is a women like personality trait which isn't surprising seeing as how he openly with a smile started he is physically weaker then his wife. Makes sense that his course of action is "I dont like to think about this because I have a son and I want him to have a good life and not have to deal with this so if I just reject it full stop It wont become an issue.
Banji you are exactly right. I wouldn't have Rudyard on the show if I didn't think he was compelling and had important things to say. But I felt it was important to play devil's advocate partly because I overwhelmingly agree with his analysis and partly because his civil war claim is bold enough that should get serious scrutiny. I wish I didn't interrupt as much in retrospect, though. I'll have him back and chill out.
Ridiculous statement. They are objectively not. There are not enough people to do any such thing. I know from direct experience with the FBI. They’re idiots and literally don’t know what is going on. You’re not important enough for them to be looking into you.
I enjoy listening to Rudyard, and have been watching is channel for a few years. I'm too old, but I would love to see his where his thoughts end up in 50-60 years, when he actually has experience, and maybe some wisdom. Right now his theories/views are based on his study of history (which sometimes repeats and sometimes does not) and anecdotes from his very limited time in this world.
Honestly even a whole lifetime of gaining experience and wisdom isn’t enough to have real perspective over such complex and nuanced functions of society and life on this planet. Probably the reason we evolved to be extremely collaborative and the more intelligent of us put a lot of weight on history as an indicator, because the two constants are human nature and seeking higher order/meaning.
His conclusions are based entirely on vibes, gut feelings, and his own approximations. Very wishy-washy. Of course yahoos on youtube will say he's "spot on" but what do they know aside from their own anecdotes and gut feelings?
Yup, Millennials figured this out a while ago. The only reliable way to get consistent pay raises and promotions is to job hop every 2 to 3 years. If you're good at your job companies don't want to peomote you and train a new person to fill your shoes. Also ironically higher paying management positions often require less experience in their field than many of the lower paid technical jobs. My direct supervisor is awesome because she did my job before getting promoted to her current position but her boss has never done anything in my career field, he only has management experience. He's decent at his job but he really has no idea how my job works so when he tries to give feedback everyone knows to just kinda ignore him and ask people with experience.
@@orimoreau3138which is a huge problem in industries where they have imported H1B from India, they are extremely tribal, and lobhy aggressively to get more into the country. This is find to be a big problem if we don't get this stopped soon.
Exactly. I see the businessmen as getting rich by destroying the previous generation's incentive structure. Then the next generation adapts and corpos ask "Why aren't people working hard?"
I have my suspicions, but we keep working on trying to do better and figure things out. We started publishing in 2022 but made some changes last year that I think were for the better and have been growing steadily since. Stuff takes time to grow.
There's no new movies. I'm sure we're all agreeing. Dad says yes there are, until it's pointed out that they're unwatchable and he agrees ... I'm hoping Rudyard can save Dad, because as it stands now, Dad's not going to be saving anything.
his channel popped up on my feed months ago. ive listened to a few of his videos. I didnt know he wasnt educated in the standard way, but rather is a "self taught scholar", which imho is probably better suited in some instances simply b/c one can use the internet to gather, compile, analyze, etc info/data and come up with conclusions based thereof (of course that would involve conclusions across a spectrum from highly unlikely, to highly probable and all in between).
A 100 grand driving a truck? I drove a truck. If you want to have a life and a family, you ain’t gonna make 100 driving a truck. The years of making big bucks driving a truck are long gone.
He has no sympathy for young men or young white men. His response to 95% nonwhite, non-male hiring by corporate America was "Just like, go succeed bro". He comes off as the rich former corporate guy that he actually is.
3000 applications to get 1 minimum wage job is the biggest glaring example of why men of skill, experience, and education and the unskilled both are just dropping out.
You dismiss Rudyards point of women giving no pushback against tyranny by saying your wife holds her own. And yes, I'm sure she does in the playground of your house where there's no risk and the boundaries are set and safe. But are you telling me if the gestapo / fbi kicked down your door and said "you're coming with us" she would fight? Let's not kid ourselves.
I'll give you a longer reply on this issue since you've engaged in good faith. I didn't dismiss his point. I agreed with his point, noting that it was an "on average" situation, which is why I brought up my wife (who Rudyard has met) simply to note that the average isn't everything. This is the problem with become too reactionary to woke satanic communism. One can become what they despise. Are women on-average physically weaker than men? Obviously. Are women on-average more inclined towards concern and hyper-vigilance/neuroticism? Yes, and for good reason (to keep babies alive). but... Are mothers ferocious defenders of their children? Yes. Are they brave in such situations? On average, YES. Is that mirrored in the mammalian kingdom? Of course it is. Men on-average, are warriors and workers, and oriented towards things and action and risk. Women, on-average, are nurturers and oriented towards people and socializing and avoiding risk. You can see this crystal clear in the distribution of male-to-female ratios in professions. None of this would even be worth talking about because it's completely frigging obvious facts... only it's become "right wing" and "heterodox" because the left is insane and asserts black-slate, brain-dead nonsense in pursuit of destroy civilization. I don't think it's useful to play into the communist zombies hand by mirroring their nonsense in bizarro reverse. Men and women are different and complimentary and essential partners. Husbands SHOULD admire their wives and put them, especially in public, on a bit of pedestal. That's called chivalry. Wars have been fought over this shit FOREVER. The 20 year-olds coming home from WWII wouldn't talk about women the way some of these commenters are, and that's a sign of culture degeneration. I'll hold out hope that the crowd will eventually, you know, grow the hell up.
@@DadSavesAmerica I've been hoping you'd respond to someone, Gad you have, because what some of these commenters are doing is precisely what Rudyard was describing with saying how people call him a cuck for not wanting wholesale genocide to occur (as a Christian speaking to other Christians). Psychotic larping extremist views coming out only online where these people can engage in such things without real backlash. Same thing as the rabid woman haters do, all in all, attacking a man speaking positively of his wife 😂
He’s full of shit and clearly never been around a real conflict where women are present. Just go to a rough bar and watch a bar fight break out, the women run away or hide behind their men, even the alleged tough women Or just watch women cops get absolutely owned by regular unarmed average men
Dad should know rate of inflation is not calculated using the same method as the 1970s. So inflation is just as bad using the same method of calculation.
"just get a job!!" I cant. I got out of high school 6 months ago and I have applied to literally every single minimum wage no-experience job and small business in my area and i have not heard a SINGLE word back.
It’s awesome these guys are willing to openly discuss men’s social issues. That said, for feminists, it’s a zero sum game. You cannot address men’s issues without giving the impression of disadvantaging women and society will not tolerate even the perception of disadvantaging women.
If you are trying to compare 'inflation' now with 'inflation' in the 70s and 80s you have to realise that the way of measuring price inflation has been changed and manipulated downwards so much that you are comparing apples and oranges.
The way they describe it seems more like a cover story. It's like if you are doing something illegal in the woods behind your house and tell your neighbor before hand you are going check if the ditches are clogged.
@@emilymiller1792 my girlfriend says that the lie or cover up is worse than the action. So if someone with a Russian accent asks if my neighbors are Ukrainian and I lie and say no. Is that by itself a bad thing
If you don't know who Barbarossa is of MGTOW fame, then you have no idea what's really going on right now and will join the ranks of hundreds of people who he said would try in vain to make sense of this storm.
@@r2dad282 No, you're pointing to a historic mindset. Mindsets are often rooted in delusion. Many of them are good delusions that help motivate people toward good actions, but delusions they remain.
Zero sum means that one person's gain comes at another's expense. When someone gets hired, that's not at the expense of the person who didn't, since you can't lose something that isn't yours to begin with.
Being a man dating today is like a starving person hoping for bread. Being a woman dating today is being a person surrounded by bread and hoping you get a steak.
1:23:58 as one of the people who has “stuck it out” and advanced in a career, this is wholly old man nonsense. It’s still really hard and it still feels miserable. It also doesn’t take into account that since the pandemic, most people have taken what is essentially a 50% pay cut due to inflation. I was making pretty good money in 2019, and I’ve gotten raises since, but it doesn’t nearly cover the huge jump in price of just about everything. I’ve looked at changing careers, but it involves taking at least a 60% reduction in pay, not accounting for education costs. I cannot imagine starting out in this economic environment, it has to be horrible for gen Z.
@9mwood Rudyard says a lot of stuff too. Let's see how often he's right by the time he's Alex's age. Alex has been right on some pretty huge and unexpected things.
As a black male born n rasied in philly. I've experienced the non woke and later the woke while in college. It is two different planets and the sad part is the woke people think they are doing the world a favor. The non-woke see the other half as prey or in disgust. Enough transplants moved to philly to fundamentally change how the city feels now. It's not even close to the same as 6 or even 3 years ago. Too many non-philadelphians ruined the city. It's a constant struggle between natives and transplants. More poverty and more new rich people to rob. Seeing the same struggle take place everywhere though. I see license plates from almost all 50 states now and even CANADA. What happened to making your own town great instead of moving?
Rudyard is 1000% correct when he's talking about the school and work cultures. When he talks about the headphones thing the interviewer asks incredulously, "have you worked at any of these jobs, where do you get this from?" Meanwhile, I have worked plenty of those jobs, did experience those things he's talking about. He's spot on.
Really appreciated the take on drawing the line before the neo-Nazis. I had a similar moment when I was a moderately successful right-leaning TH-camr a while back. Lots of that type trying to win me over. Happy for you.
I keep hearing that Civil War is going to happen, but no one ever points out who will actually be doing the fighting, and specifically or what reason. Like, I mean, what's going to happen? On some particular day it will be announced that we're in a Civil War, so I need to pick a random person to get violent with? Why do that when I can simply continue to live my life, work the job, grab lunch as usual, etc? Seems strange to me. Like, it just seems like far to much work to pick a group to be questionably angry at, when I can just play Street Fighter with my friends in the evening.
Read between the lines. He makes an absurd claim. Then complains how everything is expensive and collapsing which is true. Does not elaborate on how anything will play out. Then gets more publicity from podcast to podcast. Bro is grifting his way through a mortgage 😂 gotta respect the hustle
That's not how it works. A ton of the prerequisites are in place, it's the trigger that is the unknown. Just go look up what started previous revolutions & civil wars. Same thing, a bunch of escalating factors that precipitate a major social unrest. What varies is that ignition point. If you look up like 3 separate historical examples you will see 3 different triggers but it will make more sense to you after knowing what those are. If makes you see how it could happen plausibly.
@@spudruckus7297 "look up what started previous revolutions & civil wars." I've read about this in the past. The first Civil War makes sense why it happened. And if I lived right before it happened, it would be very clear to me why it would happen. These are very different times. The fights that we've seen happen already in modern times, like the White House attack, and the Tikki Torches situation up north, it's still vague to me why those groups did what they did. I've heard their reasons but none of it makes logical sense to me. Kind of like when Rudyyard said, "if you're a young white man, the people in charge don't want you there". But those same people in charge champion white non hetero men, so how does this make sense? It just doesn't. If this was one of other reasons why someone wanted to fight, my eyebrows would remain raised for quite some time. If Civil War does happen, I'll probably be one of those folks who will be confused why the fighting is happening.
Lynch is a fascinating character. I laugh at the people who mock him (Rudyard you know who I'm talking about lol) as I know multiple actual PROFESSIONAL historians who love his content.
You talk about the fact that most young people can't afford to have a house or car and be able to feed themselves and then you say that you think the middle class has shrunk because the upper class has grown. Absolute cope.
Regarding the Columbia protests, the problem is that we don't train children to be critical thinkers. Rush Limbaugh used to say something to the effect: "Don't tell people what to think; teach them how to think." When you train someone to be submissive and swallow whatever you tell them, you make them vulnerable to any charismatic guru or garbage propaganda that comes along. This is especially a problem with how many parents raise their daughters, which is why so many of those students were girls. Many parents of daughters, whether with the good intentions of protecting them or because they are dismissive of their abilities, just pat their daughters on the head and don't bother challenging them intellectually or in any other life skills.
Morley Winograd, education advisor to Al Gore, wrote a white paper (that no longer appears on the web) about why millennials should not be taught critical thinking, but instead taught how to rely on 'trusted sources' like google and peers.
We are in a gynocentric social order which is fundamentally an emotional society based on security and harm avoidance. If we taught critical thinking and rationality as a model for looking at education, it would unravel the social order. Boys and men by a much larger magnitude than is already waking up, would ask why they are holding up society for little to no reward. And the answer would be, because you're expected to.
Lord knows we have too many women in positions of power that are incompetent intellectually. A lot of it could stem from failure to teach female children to think critically, but much is also due to women’s natural leanings towards safety, security, and comfort over all. Also, teaching our young boys without proper male role models, or teaching them that male character qualities are “toxic” isn’t helping. There’s such a horrible cluster of problems 🤦
I'm still waiting for someone to describe what a civil war looks like here in the U.S.. Who is fighting whom? As mentioned in this episode, there's not the same clear division between the two clashing ideological sides as it was between the North and the South, so I'm looking for someone to explain what they mean by a civil war. Things veered off into another direction as soon as this question was asked, and they never came back to this point to answer it.
First time viewer of your channel. I follow Rudyard and his channel and decided to watch because of him. Got to say, I’m glad I did. You’ve just picked up another sub. I liked the back and forth between the two of you. Seems we have a lot of views in common.
@@DadSavesAmericaI really appreciate the way you think and your humility to have such a young intellectual on and you enjoy his content. I know some men would just dismiss him on his age but he is wise beyond his years.
One part of the conversation caught my attention in particular because it caused an emotional response when i heard it. That emotion being mild anger. It was when you were talking about trying to hire now days. You said show up to work on time, dont ask about PTO in the interview etc. Getting to work on time, yeah fair enough. Not asking about PTO in the interview? Nowdays companies wont even post a salary range for a position. They arent applying to your company because they worship the ground you walk on. They are applying because they have bills to pay. A job offer is a legal contract. Your discussing terms of a labor contract as part of that interview. In Europe PTO is government mandated so it doesnt have to be discussed. Here it does. Are you going to pay me enough to pay my bills and feed the family? If not i need to know that. Are you going to have enough PTO for a sick kid in daycare, and my elderly parent who needs to be taken to the hospital after a fall? Am i going to be reprimanded because i had to take off to let the cops in for a wellness check on my wife? (That actually happened three months into my current job.) Life happens. Are you going to work with me, and treat me like a human? These shouldnt be interview ending questions for you, and if they are you might need to take a step back, and ask yourself some hard questions. My last employer made tires. Company starts with a B. Coworker got wrote up for a no call no show while she was at work. How? She had to leave when her shift ended to pick up her kid from day care. Person behind her called out. Boss says she has to stay an extra four hours with thirty minutes notice. She obviously says she cant make arrangements in thirty minutes, she has to leave. Not staying for overtime despite having already worked her full shift got her written up no call no show while she was still at work. No, im sorry. Companies expect you to be greatful for the privilege of just barely scrapping by. But its okay! They'll buy you pizza three times a year! All while my current manager just built 3 new houses on 300 acres for him and his kids. Meanwhile one coworker has to sell scrap metal between paychecks to have enough gas to make it to work. All while hes eating rice so he can make sure his kids have meat and vegetables. One guys car is falling apart, and cant afford to fix it, etc, etc. No. Absolutely not. Not wanting to discuss PTO during a legal contract negotiation for employment is unacceptable. PTO is part of the american pay package now, especially for salary positions. Not wanting to discuss it makes you look dishonest at best.
I literally stuck it out of a job for over 10 years, trying to wait to be the manager being an exemplary employee showing up on time doing more than my share and being on task and on time and I was never rewarded. It is better to be liked than to do a good job. I’m so upset with what have said because it doesn’t work.
I’m a 46 year old male. What is being talked about specifically past this point 50:36 in the video I believe also applies to me. I lost my career in Dec. 2020 due to 💉 lockdowns, and due to my position becoming obsolete at a Fortune 500 company, since I had to be in corporate HQ’s to do the duties my career required. Later, in Sept. 2021, I had some major, physical health issues arise, and have been essentially recuperating from that/jobless since. I’ve now gotten to the point where I am applying to as many jobs I can find in a pretty small town, with not as many “larger” businesses/potential job openings available for me to apply to, based off of my previous work experience. I firmly believe that because I honestly (morals and ethics) answer the race question (white, non-Hispanic) that I’m being discriminated against due to the predominance of corporate diversity culture. I know I will find something eventually however, I won’t deny that: people are losing jobs/monthly new job #’s are being manipulated to the “high side” because of political pressures from our standing, election time government (only to have downward revisions come out after the media hype train touts the “great” new job #’s, which most people don’t know of/care to actually look into), and some other outlying factors. Lastly, I’m not completely convinced about Rudyard’s prognostications for civil w@hr, as enough people now, and more every day are becoming aware of these broken realities that we face. I think it will take more years to get to C.W. levels, and think a civilian revlutn against the folks in the big ⚪️🏠 is more likely, before C.W. P.S. Ain’t it a d@mn sh🤬me we have to t@lk like thi$ h€r£?
I wonder how many old men across endless strings of ruined empires believed they were still a ways off from the Civil War they or their sons would die in?
@@danielantonyuk6446hard to say but as we further and further displaced and disenfranchised in our own country by foreigners both legal and not, while simultaneously propagandizing them all that it is wytee's fault, this is just going to continue to ratchet up ethnic tension, so there's that.
If you like what you see and want to stay up to date with Dad Saves America, please subscribe here on TH-cam or over on Substack, where you can find weekly articles and the audio version of the podcast, with more to come in the near future!
www.dadsavesamerica.com
leftism:
Otherwise known as “progressivism” and even more inaccurately as “liberalism”, leftism is a term originating from the French Revolution of 1789, in reference to the political faction that opposed the French (so-called) king. However, the term is currently used in common discourse to describe those criminals who actively support (or at least tacitly condone) a host of OBJECTIVELY-WICKED ideologies and practices that contravene dharma, such as non-monarchical governances and corrupt economic systems (particularly socialism, communism, fascism, and liberal democracies), egalitarianism, feminism, perverse sexuality (especially homosexuality, bestiality, and transvestism), multiculturalism, and the illegitimate abortion of innocent, defenceless, unborn children. Cf. “dharma”.
In a vain attempt to legitimize their objectively-immoral propensities, leftists invariably replace accurate terms with blatant EUPHEMISMS, such as “gay”, “sex worker”, “pro-choice”, and “queer”, and of course, coin novel words for notions that cannot exist, particularly the nonsensical term, “transgender”. Furthermore, leftists are constantly inventing truly inane, vacuous words to demonize conservatives, such as “homophobia” and “transphobia” (which literally mean “fear of sameness” and “fear of change”, respectively).
In the past decade or two (of this treatise being composed), the mass media, especially the motion picture industry and television production companies, has been aggressively promoting all the above CRIMINAL ideologies and practices, helping to expedite the destruction of human civilization. Recently, large corporations have jumped on the leftist bandwagon (so to speak), in order to profit.
As explicated in Chapter 11 of this “A Final Instruction Sheet for Humanity”, the state of being of any particular human (or any other animal, for that matter) is due entirely to his or her genetic sequencing and his or her conditioning. Therefore, the explosion of the leftist/liberal mentality in recent decades, particularly in Western countries, has been caused by poor breeding strategies overtaking the more conservative tradition of mate-selection of previous centuries (and indeed, millennia), as well as the concerted effort of Marxists to spread their nefarious ideology throughout the school system. In other words, due to the fact that criminal behaviour (especially the deviant sexual acts mentioned above) has become increasingly more tolerated, condoned, and even GLORIFIED in most countries, there has been a proliferation of corrupt genetic codes within the wider human population.
According to genealogists, for (almost) the entire history of humanity, most women have successfully reproduced, whilst a far far smaller percentage of males have bequeathed their genetic sequence to proceeding generations. Due to the gradual phasing-out of polygamous marriages in even the most conservative societies, as well as the eradication of poverty in most every country, more and more men (as well as women) have been producing offspring. Thus, the human genome has rapidly become adulterated by inferior genetic material (that is, DNA from truly pathetic, uxorious beta-males, bisexuals, and even homosexual couples who engage surrogate mothers or sperm donors in order to conceive children - something of a rare occurrence in previous centuries/millennia).
For centuries, breeders of elite animals such as horses, cattle, and dogs, have known that selecting the finest examples of a breed of animal will result in offspring with desirable characteristics. For example, present day thoroughbred horses boast a pedigree of the best-available horses from the seventeenth century. Such breeders are willing to pay enormous sums of money merely to hire the fastest stallions on earth in order for them to mate with their mares. In the case of we humans, women have traditionally chosen the most competent and masculine men with whom to bear children, and in general, have totally eschewed those males who displayed effeminate traits, and who showed themselves incapable of properly supporting a nuclear family. Unfortunately, due to rapid moral decay over the past few decades, Western women have become extremely sexually promiscuous, resulting in a multiplication of unwanted progeny (and, of course, an escalation of abortions). Boys born to single mothers often lack proper male role models and invariably become feminized, unable (and often unwilling) to continue a strong lineage of progenitors. The solution to this problem is simply to ensure that society adheres to the principles of DHARMA (see the Glossary definition of that term, as well as Chapter 12).
Unsurprisingly, the majority of leftists find it difficult to accept the fact that their criminal mentality is largely inherited (and of course, they are unwilling to acknowledge the blatantly-obvious fact that their ideologies and practices are intrinsically sinful, wicked, evil and immoral in the first place!). It seems the consensus amongst leftist “intellectuals” is that every human mental trait is due entirely to one’s environmental conditioning and social milieu, rather than as a consequence of BOTH one’s genetic sequence and one’s life-long conditioning - a fundamentally-flawed assertion that cannot be scientifically supported. I would not be surprised if the typical leftist would believe that, if the parents of the twentieth century communist tyrant, Joseph Stalin, and the parents of the Divine Incarnation, Lord Jesus Christ, had somehow crossed the time barrier, and exchanged their baby boys shortly after their births, that Stalin would have grown to become a Prophet for God, whilst Christ would have become a murderous, left-wing dictator!
This term was very reluctantly used in the chapter on feminism. I say “reluctantly” because it is unlikely that the term will perdure for many decades longer. This is simple deductive logic, since, as clearly demonstrated in certain chapters in “F.I.S.H”, human civilization cannot survive with such leftist practices and ideologies in place. If you happen to be reading this Holy Scripture a century or more after its conception, you will probably be residing in a nation (as opposed to a country) ruled by a monarch, following the implosion of post-modern, decadent societies. So, either the term “leftism” will eventually become redundant and obsolete, or else, human civilization will devolve into a decadent, diseased state of existence similar to that of the prehistoric era, when the peoples of the world resided in caves or shacks, subsisting on whatever food can be sourced from the surrounding bushland. I trust that you who are reading these wise words will endeavour to influence your social circles to adhere to right-leaning ideologies and practices, such as (above all) monarchical governance, an entirely free-market economy, sexual purity, veganism, and all other virtuous principles.
Fear not, for God is with you!
P.S. As a general rule, it seems (at least anecdotally) that the farther left-leaning is a person, the more physically (and of course, psychologically) UGLY is that person. Unfortunately, that does not seem to prevent leftists from propagating their mutant genes.🤡
N.B. In order to clarify the notion of inheritability, it is not being claimed that an adharmic (far-left) couple will INVARIABLY produce leftist children, but that it is more PROBABLE that they will do so, considering their genetic sequence and the environmental conditioning they are bound to impart to their children, just as two parents with a certain physiological disorder are more likely to generate offspring with that specific disease. In this regards, it is recommended to study introductory texts on epigenetics. 🧬
In my particular case, I was raised by a staunch communist, and so, was indoctrinated to believe that communism was the best course of action for a just society. Indeed, as a teenager, I even volunteered in the election campaign of a socialist politician, who eventually became the Premiere of the state of Western Australia. However, after studying dharma, I came to learn that I was misled by my father in this regard, and that the only system of governance that is dharmic (legitimate) is a divinely-sanctioned monarchy.
Hard right is far beyond caring about Jesus/christianity…you’re far too normie to even comprehend exactly where the far end is
love that you mentioned the invisibles. I felt the same way. social justice woke wet dream
You should have Justin Steffman on here
So happy to find your podcast! Great work and im looking forward to watching the rest of your stuff
"Imagine you have a house..."
You lost me there. I cannot imagine such an incredibly silly fantasy world where I'd have a house.
This made me lol, but I realize it's the sad reality for most these days.
"what is... house? is it something you eat?"
I get it. However, there are plenty of micro houses, trailer homes, foreclosures well under 100k. You just have to be willing to live outside of urban areas.
I'm just trying to help and offer solution most people don't think of.
Work hard for 5 years and you can buy a tiny house (aka a shed).
Or start a business & get access to that business lending capital & you can make things move pretty quick financially if you have the right business idea.
Well, one does have to work their buns off to save money, and be able to invest. That is if you don't get an inheritance. 😯
My idea. Put even a little bit of money in an investment while young. Get a Roth account, there are small investments you can build. Keep building it. Save, save, save your money. Do your research. Take a class whatever.
A successful life takes work, and making good decisions.
What kind of life do you want to lead? What kind of fulfillment? The best thing to do is make decisions for yourself that make you happy in a deeper way. That sounds obvious, but making the right decisions is huge. Right decisions about career, jobs, money, the right life partner, etc. Don't settle, or think it's impossible.
I’m a 25 year old man. It really bothers me how much what Rudyard says resonates with me. I want him to be wrong so bad, and then he describes my life perfectly and I’m like “f*ck” every time
38 m here. He's correct 💯. But, you young 🌱 men should benefit from the generational churn. As the Boomers die of old age, they will yield their remaining assets (housing yay!) and the Millennials will become the big voting block. Millennials in our then 40s will be completely "through the chute" but you will benefit more from the churn. Your labor will be more valuable. Just don't get into student debt w an English major like many Millennials did. Also, invest. Americans get rich off investments, not wages. (BUY THE VOO)
I’m 47
Was madly in love and had a wonderful first 15 years of marriage.
The last 5 have been real tough
(1) if you get married get a prenup
(2) if you have kids don’t give them an iPad till 16
(3) recommend you save 50% of salary and invest in a business (~100k laundromat)
(4) you’ll be a millionaire when 35.
At 35 get your passport and marry an Eastern European girl
Do not marry a western woman
(5) I think I’m going to be able to stay married but only because I make $170j per year and take a lot of shit
(6) I’m not sure what happened but women in USA have gone completely insane
This is why I was excited to have him on. I'm clearly out of touch with what you guys are going through in this world. As I said in the convo, I feel like I caught the last chopper out of Vietnam. But I want to find a way to be helpful. That's actually what this channel is all about.
@@DadSavesAmerica I make well over 100k in california and I still barely can save money at 41. Thank God I am at a company with a 401k match otherwise retirement would be completely out of the question. I cringe for my toddlers future. Because we are barely making it.
@@nathangill8404I believe everyone should at the very minimum understand Bitcoin. Like actually understand it. Then decide if it’s worth having.
No offense to the interviewer, but Rudyard does better when you give him a direction and let him go. The thought train got cut off A LOT.
way too much. this interview SUCKED! Look at the title. It turned out to be nothing more than click bait. He doesn't know how to interview for shit
agreed. "Dad" underestimates his audience's intelligence
@@garrettlees Yeah, "Dad" was insufferable, had to turn it off
When the host wants to match wits but can’t
Even Tim Pool let Rudyard speak. He's so impressive.
I normally don’t do this multiple posting but the “just stick it out” moment got me.
I ran a whole damn department, taught myself to code, saved the company thousands of dollars, played by the rules for TEN YEARS. Ten years!!!!
I didn’t make enough to even remotely come close to being able to own a home and then was fired. This is the out of touch view even gen x has. I
Work my ass off just for myself just to barely scrape by. I was richer in purchasing power working min wage in high school than I am now.
So.. then.. your point is that YOUR disposition is the example that the guest uses to make the argument that people will become unhinged to the point of open violence?
Fellow coder here. If you’re not working anyway, consider cutting expenses to the bone and doing a startup. What have you got to lose? Move where the cost of living is low (or go van life), pick up some side contracts on Upwork to pay the bills, and put in ridiculous hours. That’s (almost) the same path that I’m on.
You need to learn to negotiate and to go where you will be most wanted and most paid.
They don't have a clue. They still will not understand when it kicks off.
I understand your problem man I've been in a depression for a long time lost a job of 16 years due to alcoholism. Multiple posts are necessary to complete the picture
Glad to see Rudyard getting all this attention lately from different content creators. He’s really knowledgeable about history (my favorite subject in high school) and he’s just great to listen to
I find conversations with people on the spectrum are actually really good. They answer a question directly, they don't varnish or sugar coat or worry about how other people see them. They're like spock. I find it refreshing. "Does my bum look big in this" ?.... "Yes".
is he autistic?
America defends itself by being too fat to draft.
Wait until they starve us out of it
A week or two of food shortage will sort that out. Slimmed down by circumstance.
Work out now find Christ it's a horrible time to slack in those area's an it's worth doing anytime anyways.
Fat camps exist
It'll be the first war you see a soldier getting out of a tank wearing a diabetic boot.
"If you find yourself in a bad situation, lean into it". Profound wisdom. Crazy, if not scary, how mature this guy at least sounds like, if not is.
Your wife being braver than you doesn't mean women aren't less risk adverse. It means you are less risk adverse than other men at worst, or you are pandering to your wife at best.
Sounds like a simp. It's easy for women to be brave with their life choices because they know there will always be men who will bail them out
You don't know my wife. She's a beast in the best possible way. I've learned a lot from her.
I agree with the poster. Based on your comment alone i wont be watching the rest of this episode. Be a man.@DadSavesAmerica
@@DadSavesAmericadude stop being manlet and start behaving like a man.
@@DadSavesAmericaread the first sentence of the comment again please. You didn't disprove it, you just stated your previous thought again
The host wants to live in anecdotes to hide from the painful truths poor single men live in, its an expected knee jerk reaction
He's an older man who doesn't have to deal with anything he's talking about.
Too many simps and quasi-men are blue pilled, and they pander and worship wahmen.
@@arkhost224 How do you know he hasn’t in the past? In my opinion, American women, single, married, wealthy, poor, etc., are all very difficult in today’s world in America.
@@GregoryArkadin-j5v Did you not like, watch any of the interview?
The counterarguments that he tosses out are so out of touch with reality that it's intentional obstanance. Even granting the "devil's advocate" angle, it's so off base as to convey that he simply lives in a different reality.
I had Rudyard on our show and spent the time and money to produce and present this because:
1. you're totally correct that I'm a Gen-Xer who's out of touch with the world you all are dealing with to some extent, and...
2. I actually really fucking care about you people because I have an almost 20 year old son who's confronting the same fucked world and would rather our country not collapse.
Pushing back and playing devil's advocate is fair game, my friends. Rudyard's smart enough to joust and I came away even more impressed with his thinking than before.
The amount of lost young men in this country should tell you enough. Idle hands with no hope or future is a dangerous combination.
I wish the powers that be would take this seriously. It's time to focus on young men's issues.
Absolutely! Terrorist organizations the world over are filled with young men who had no hope for the future and no prospects at having a wife and children. That's a big part of why ISIS was appealing to young men because it promised them adventure, an outlet for their aggression and a wife.
Also as far as I can tell pretty much every mass shooter did not have a girlfriend or a wife.
It's just hard to ruminate and get carried away on dangerous ideas for days and days at a time when you have a woman who comes to see you or lives with you.
Absolutely! Terrorist organizations the world over are filled with young men who had no hope for the future and no prospects at having a wife and children. That's a big part of why isis was appealing to a young men because it promised them adventure, an outlet for their aggression and a wife.
Also as far as I can tell pretty much every mass shooter did not have a girlfriend or a wife.
It's just hard to ruminate and get carried away on dangerous ideas for days and days at a time when you got a woman who comes to see you or lives with you.
Yes unfortunately none will defend this country when Kamala initiates the final act to start ww3 proxy wars are started it’s just a matter of time.
Yeah it's unfortunate that leftist's have taken over the education system.. They disregard or outright deny history..
This Dad dude is just like a chick. When someone makes a point in generalities, which is necessary to make decisions, he immediately says, “well not my wife. “.
I picked up on that, too. I'm betting his wife is the dominant force in his house.
He constantly stated his wife is more masculine than him. That's a yikes, bro.
Exactly
Man, I thought the same thing. Like, what kind of man diminishes his own masculinity??? I don't get that
@TheMissing8 yeah, i had to take a break from the video at that point.
"Low level jobs actively punish those who have agency." As someone who's been at the bottom since my first job, I can completely confirm that this is very true.
If you have initiative a manager will punish you.
If you meet your quota they will tell you to keep working and increase your quota over time.
If you are one of the top performers and very productive but have one low productivity day, all they do is give you hate for not being great on that one day.
If you are caught talking you will be scolded, but the managers and CEO's visiting will always just stand around and talk about sports, whoever is hot, and endlessly give you a double standard.
Only office workers and management can slack off and chat with each other.
Low level jobs also suck so much because management actively abuse and mistreat workers at the bottom.
True, but that's how the hierarchy works. The people at the bottom are needed less for the work they do, but for being the punching bags for the ones above.
@@nocturnaljoe9543that's completely backwards. The people at the bottom are needed the most! Every manager at the factory I work at could take the day off and work would still get done. But if all the workers took the day off.....chaos. It's just that we're easily replaceable.
@@nocturnaljoe9543 It seems the workers support the non-productive higher ups. Because the middle mangers and upper managers don't do most of the work. And the CEOs only make 4 good decisions per year. (Jeff Bezos)
So do you mean to say the low level workers are paid just to get abused and ordered around?
@@veedub0602 The ones at the bottom are essential, because they are replaceable. There can be no hierarchy without the disposable worker drone.
That's why you only do the bare minimum. Lying and manipulating them works too. Also don't forget to take some inventory to make up for all their bs.
You can also make your bosses job difficult. Put wrenches in his stuff. Then get fired and laugh at them in front of your colleagues.
Or quit yourself and make a scene making management look dumb. There are options.
"you can make 100k driving a truck" .............no you cannot , that's a theory the actual practice is you go 5k to 10k for training then go to work driving making 40k and that doesn't change for years
Exactly, there are those driving positions...most drivers are not making that much.
"Pro baseball players are making millions a year!" True but the majority of pro baseball players are in the minor leagues barely making more than a service worker on minimum wage.
I have yet to find a 100k a year job but I am also not willing to sleep in a truck for weeks or months away from my family. You can do it though. I make 75 to 80k and sleep in my bed every night.
This is why I always hated listening to megachurch men and motivational types. They say something about the rare person who makes it big, then acts like anyone who doesn't make it just didn't believe XYZ hard enough.
Being a trucker now is basically being an indentured servant.
100k is doable IF you own your own truck. But driving for a company is ~50k starting, you're away from home for weeks at a time and now they all have cameras in the cab. No thanks.
Not being able to express excitement or being happy is so true. At my 7 year olds soccer game I cheered too loud for her and my wife hushed me. She legitimately felt embarrassed that i was rooting for my daughter to win a soccer game.
we live in "cringe culture" where it's cool to be acting like everything is below you and you're unimpressed
@@orimoreau3138 Sounds like the US has become the UK. We've been like that forever. American enthusiasm/positivity was always seen as embarrassing to be around, but secretly we admired it. If you genuinely lose that, you will lose an important part of your identity. Don't let it happen.
@faustoferrari4303 dang, this is sad but so true. It just hit me how soulcrushing it can be to self censor or modulate genuine emotional expression at the behest of (probably forced) social "norms"
@@LateNightRewrites Well put!! But it amused me that the way you express it, with the underlying excitement at your realisation is so American. Keep it up.
Tbf it has always been a part of British culture to be as unmoved by emotion as possible, ‘stiff upper-lip’ culture might not be as prominent or spoken of now but it exists through our society in how we still look down at others who are very expressive like Americans and Italians as weird.
Is this a new podcast thing, where the camera zooms in so close to their face you can see their mitochondria?
Granular setting
OMG LOL. Your unexpected hyperbole slapped my science brain in the funny bone!! I've gotta remember that one.....
lmao dude above me thinks recognizing mitochondria is sign of a "science brain".
good one.
It's the powerhouse of the cell! 🔋 📷
Bro rudyard does that “the south won wwii and the nazis won the civil war” switch every time and no one calls him out on it hahah
It’s on purpose 🫢 think
Because it’s a joke at this point.
I think it started as a mistake that he’s running with.
Nick fritas has, no one are I've heard though
The southern Reich will rise again! Yeeeeee jaa!
The Great Depression wasn't just caused by the stock market crash. There was a huge drought in the 1930s that made a lot of farmers go bankrupt and caused food shortages.
The Great Depression was caused by a purposeful market manipulation from the banks.
Don't forget the Smoot Hawley Tariff Act
It wasn't a drought. It was a "dust bowl". That dust bowl happened because the farmers had cleared the land in preparation for planting, then went to the banks to obtain a farming loan, were not granted the necessary loan, and that land then sat there, dried up due to lack of covering vegetation and became sand and dust.
The farmers weren't granted loans exactly because of the depression, which was caused by the 1913 Federal Reserve Act, and the larger banks attempted to kill all of the small banks who previously refused to sell out to the larger banks.
So, yes, the 1929 market crash was intentionally caused by the banks in 1920-25, which the Federal Reserve Act was supposed to prevent.
It was a con job between the banks and the politicians.
@@dreamingmusic3299 Fair enough. I should have been more precise. I think there were droughts that contributed to the dust bowl conditions at the time though, at least in western Canada where I'm from. I heard so much about the horrible drought of the 1930s from my relatives who were children at the time.
@@tuckerprice5521 - I wasn't attempting to be a D, I was just commenting for accuracy.
Rudyard is maybe one of the few I break to listen. This young man has amazing insights
Rudy makes too many undeclared assumptions. He assumes people are stupid because they started a war and lost it. Meanwhile, he wants people not to be cowards... he will call them stupid when they act on their courage and lose. Rudy.... embrace the right wing and get in line, stop being stupid and coward.
As a European who came to America for a better life ... when Obama was elected I seriously started researching many other countries as alternatives. And realized there aren't any. It's generally worse everywhere else. This is it fellas, we have to defend our freedoms.
Yup. People talk about fleeing the country. And go where exactly? The rest of the modern world is suffering from the same things that America is except even worse. There's nowhere else to go. This is home and we have to fight the globalists for our country.
Italy?
While I am getting my Italian dual-citizenship, and love the country at a genetic level, I'm afraid that America is indeed the best we've got overall, for all its problems.
We can't let it be destroyed by communists.
...then go defend them.
@@DadSavesAmericaalso working towards my Italian citizenship!
The plight of young men can be explained in a small example within my romantic relationship. My partner doesn’t seem to take what I say seriously until I express anger. I don’t want to express myself through anger, but that seems to be the only way my message is received.
Almost all men are cucked in the current system. I wish you Americans luck in the coming conflict. You may defeat the leftists and become men again.
I resonate with this deeply. I'm a calm man by nature. But at some point I realised that no one takes me seriously unless I become outwardly angry and aggressive. No matter the relationship, friend, lover, housemates, colleagues, no one will do anything I ask or take my concerns seriously unless I show anger. Then they'll actually do something.
Same here. Its all about leverage unfortunately. When I'm serious I say, "I'm not asking you, I'm telling you". But I own the house property, car etc so I can afford to do it.
Interesting insight
If you are man you are SUPPOSED to express yourself through anger. You are supposed to be dangerous and threatening
I have a chemical engineering degree, and masters in micro and nano technology, and basically finished my PhD, I have applied for about 200 jobs, and gotten nothing. I dont believe in DEI, I dont complain about my personal life, I am basically begging for any form of employment, I have a good strong work ethic, healthy, and multidisciplinary education. Yes some people are bad workers, but even good workers struggle to find jobs that fit them, the job market in western countries is saturated with workers due to immigration, technology has helped eliminate other jobs. Employer's often "fish" for employees throwing back many while falsely saturating the job offer space. And the baby boomers are working long into retirement instead of retiring, because they screwed up the economy and are poor now.
Baby boomers didn't destroy the economy. Politicians did. It wasn't baby boomers who decided to ship jobs overseas. They were affected by it too. The only difference is that they had a head start, and were able to purchase homes while they were still affordable. So they have some equity to play with. Young people don't have homes, or even job prospects.
@@nerychristian Well, at least in theory, in a democracy it's the people who vote the politicians in. And it's not politicians who owned all the businesses that did the outsourcing
@@orimoreau3138 Our generation is still voting idiots into office
@@nerychristian yes.
You don't need to believe in DEI because DEI believes in you, and by your own words you won't complain about it.
Rudyard looks 35 years old but is barely out of highschool
funny but true 😂
He needs to get a gym membership and drop off the ancient wisdom stuff, if he was handsome his incel revolution idea would be taken seriously
i think he's lying about his age LOL
The beard, receding hair line and old man glasses add to the theme.
@@aler8343 the guy is hugely successful, millions of people do listen to him.
Men will die to fight the government but not die to fight for it.. yeah. Pretty much.
ugh idk there seem to be a lot of Americans who crave subjugation and love the State.
Yeah because the society has repeatedly told us they hated us our entire lives ofc we'd rather hurt the government and beuroctacies than some foreign army that has done nothing to us
@@BajatheChickenMan but would they die for it? Or do they seem to love the state because it gives them security and allows them to be complacent?
@@BajatheChickenManExactly. That's all I see also. Comply and conform.
John.. I knew at one point you would have Rudyard on. This young man's ideas, theories, are very thought-provoking & this is the discourse we need to have in this country. Whether you agree or disagree with his ideas they are intriguing.
Thank you for having him on!
Bravo!
Rudyard is a shining light for Gen Z
I listen to him simply b/c he does intriguing, and thought provoking material.
However, I do think he is way off the mark in two areas:
Either not enough, or not at all focused on the folks at the top running the show, and the religious-spiritual arena. Make no mistake, there IS a global hierarchy that has been in play for quite some time, definitely many decades, but i'd say centuries (for millennia ?! Im not in a position to know that, let alone answer it) that stays in the shadows, so to speak.
There is a "supernatural" aspect to all of this, call it what you will: divine prophesy, divine intervention, etc.
Of course this is VERY HARD to "nail down" for obvious reasons. Its hard, if not impossible for atheists, and/or those that a very hard leaning "scientific mind" to grasp. (I did have the SM, but was able to "open new doors" so to speak, which allowed me to see things from yet another important perspective).
@@Gizziiusa We should discuss this further! Subscribed to your channel.
He has read a lot of books, but his conclusions are all drawn on vibes and "gut feelings." It sounds thought-provoking and is great for clicks on youtube but he's not the serious intellectual he tries to sell himself as. There are so many flaws in his methodology.
@@Easttowest45They’re drawn from the base of knowledge he attained through reading specialists and he forms hypothesis then tries to knock them down. Try listening harder.
This is so embarrassing for the host. He comes across as naive gen x here. He has had some good interviews before, but Rudyard is out of his league.
Why tho?
Interviewer sucks. He's cringe beyond belief
@@garrettleescan you explain why?
@@Lalapizzle way too much steering and re-directing. Won't let the interviewee finish a thought to completion without chiming in. It's almost as if he's the one who secretly wants to be interviewed. And he tries too hard to connect to his guest, which is not the point of an interview. It's not a bonding session. Plus the title turned out to be click bait as he never really let his guest get to the heart of it. He doesn't know how to listen and help the guest expand on things, just goes to the next prepared question. It means he doesn't really listen. And his hair is cringe. And he talks like his wife beats him up. Ugh.
@@Goestohollywood-l8xyeah this wasn’t a debate but a discussion and a good one at that
Alex Jones also said they're going to fly planes into buildings and blame it on bin laden. What a lucky guess lol😂
This stood out to me as well. Alex deserves nothing but the highest respect for that and many other calls.
Rudi makes too many undeclared assumptions. He assumes people are stupid because they started a war and lost it. Meanwhile, he wants people not to be cowards... you will call them stupid when they act on their courage and lose. Rudy.... embrace the right wing and get in line, stop being stupid and coward.
Yea he gets a lot accurate actually
If you have seen the Lone Gunmen, an X-Files spinoff, they predicted this only a year or so before it happened. On a show about Conspiracy Theories.
Just after they lost a couple trillion dollars, how convenient.
The job situation in the US actually is somewhat of a zero sum game. Why? Licensure hellscape. Civil Engineering, teaching, Nursing, MD's, police, firemen, plumbing, etc....all licensure jobs and many positions that are filled mostly by governments. Get rid of licensure to fix it...also limit patents to five years max since you're at it.
You don't even have to completely remove a patent after 5 years. Just require whoever uses the patent to pay the patent owner like 5% from whatever they make using the patent. That way the patent owner still gets compensated, but the idea is free to use who can make a profit with a 5% handicap.
5 year patents don't work in most cases. Government reviews and SOP take longer than that. Typical time to market for industry probably averages 5 years. Think of every thing from drug testing, crash testing cars & EPA regs, airplanes, pretty long list. The patent is applied early in the process so you don't suffer from industrial spying, employees going to competitors.
@rickcortese2023 Even more reason to just put a percentage royalty on patents, then let anyone use the idea as long as they pay the royalty.
@@geoffgjof If you could get it to work that way. Problems are things like the company you work for considers it "a work for hire" so the actual inventor sees nothing special. One of the first things the company using the patent does is see if there is anyway around paying royalties i.e. prior art, false claims, that kind of stuff. I know of one guy who was "California Inventor of the Year" that was eventually forced out of his position as Senior VP in charge of R&D for amoug other things, stealing subordinates inventions and passing them off as solely his. Just saying, it's tough to get a system that isn't exploitable in some fashion. I mean one of my supervisors stole an idea from a summer intern and when confronted about it said "it isn't the person who came up with it, it's the person who files tge first invention record!"
Qualified voting. Property owners, employed in the private sector only.
Its inevitable at this late stage. All we can do is be prepared in every way possible
Unfortunately I agree although the severity of the conflict points can still be lessened.
nah, im leaning more towards ww tree.
but I do think its either one or the other. Choose your poison, so to speak.
I think we may see another Cataclysm before humans destroy ourselves. The world is going to shake us off like fleas.
@@Gizziiusaeither way there are certain preparations we can make to increase our odds. I can't believe no one around me is taking ANY steps to prepare lol
@@thealienelite often times folks are reactionary, not preparatory.
Rudyard is so good love his ability to break down the things he see and it feels like he is saying the things that i can’t articulate
I make over 100k driving truck. I get to keep about 20k of it After all the expenses.
“Dad Saves America.”
“mY wIFe CaN bEAt Me UP!”
Ok.
This guy is pretty cringe, it's an example of the type of man that led us to this point.
Glad someone else said it. Simps are destroying the planet.
@ absolutely. 💯
That doesn’t say much about his wife, it says A LOT about him 😂
@@mountainseeker2844 💯
Sadly, all of the people I know could not tolerate this conversation long enough to comprehend the validity of it; it’s a lonely world for me, at 58.
Same at 51. I feel like these are the conversations, I get shushed to not talk about because it's "too devicive." So I go back to posting cat and dog videos. The world is becoming so boring!
Ditto
me too
As a 46 year old dude who raised kids and grinds a career job; how TF did this kid get so wise? He’s been blessed. Pay attention to this guy
History is the best teacher.
Hes clearly got autism but hes on the genius history nerd side of the spectrum
He reads a lot. Most kids nowadays have never read a book and many adults haven’t read one in decades - and when they do it’s Harry Potter.
It's crazy for real. I've never seen this from a guy this young. I think he has read an absurd number of books
He is an avid reader that is genuinely motivated by what he reads. Very few people turn out that way.
You guys are grossly underestimating Alex Jones. It really makes you look pompous that you can predict things correctly but he is crazy.
I mean he does do a lot of throwing spaghetti at the wall and seeing what sticks but he called 9/11 like a freaking psychic. Like 3 to 6 months before it happened and he specifically said Osama was going to do it and It would be the world trade center.
It was so spot I would be surprised at the FBI didn't knock on his door asking him how he had that for knowledge.
Yea Alex is the man. Rudyard is gifted but only time cures being a 23 year old.
Most people don't understand Alex's genius. It's sad.
Are you serious?
You've hear the expression: "take it with a grain of salt". When it comes to Alex Jones, take everything with a shovelful of salt. You have to wade through so much BS to get to that tiny bit of truth, it makes him an untrustworthy source of sensationalistic ramblings, unfortunately. But I agree with Rudyard and "Dad", he does occasionally get it right....
You're wrong about Alex Jones.
I'm 33. He's spot on about the jobs. I found it laughable the interviewer didn't think it was probable
The interviewer is a doofus who really shouldn’t be doing these interviews, he just can’t accept reality when it’s put in his face.
The women in charge of HR, or female bosses are just rejecting good males... they are so hate-driven and abusive. They abuse women too but women are more likely to put up with abuse, and women bosses abuse males far more.
If they can't abuse males, they'll just reject them and make them unemployed... meanwhile "there is a hiring crisis". YAEH SURE YOUR HR HIRERS ARE RETARDED and destroying everything.
If one side is owned by hostile powers, can you call it a civil war?
If it's an intrastate conflict, it's a civil war.
That's one of many rationalizations I've seen people post online both side's. It's hard to gage how serious most truly are the number's are worrisome though.
@@LiberatingamericansSeriously in just the last days I've taken note of people on both sides shouting down their own dissenting voices these are voices that are absolutely aligned with their sides but can't criticize their own the civil war will be between each sides own extremes or at least that's where it starts to catch on fire
Both parties are responsible for the destruction of our nation. Democrats have destroyed the nation domestically, the Republicans have destroyed us overseas with constant wars for Israel
@@andrewamos3880 Hello im from the future. I can prove it: In the future everyone is stupid and gay.
Ok now that you see im serious, Kamala "wins" the election and a civil war takes place that will be instigated by Russia, or so they say. All Trump supporters will be rounded up and forced to choose between the noose or becoming trans to mark your undying support for the Democratic party.
Rudyard is someone I have been waiting for years to show up... He is not afraid to expect the worst outcome, to predict pessimistically, he is not one of the 99% that wear pink-color eyeglasses that tell them 'everything is gonna be alright' and 'mama-state will take care of you', he is not afraid to make an error, to evolve his thinking... A regular champion of the people and a fearless person.
DEI hiring practices have probably put us back at least a generation in terms of where we could be. The competency crisis is evident everywhere.
They’re flying the planes and manning the ships. Be careful out there ☠️
3 black women launched white men to the moon sir.
@@adrian8113 🎵 They're flying the planes, they're manning the ships. Man the ships, ma-man the ships 🎵
A generation?! Try 3 😂. It’s been going on since title 9
The interviewer is terrible. Constantly interrupts to interject all his own takes.
On the contrary, I see this as a different perspective on Rudyard where he gets to answer some critical questions. I don't really trust people until they show they can survive some friendly broiling, so this interview does the job for me.
Rudyard's made the rounds and we know each other outside of podcast land, so I opted for a more devil's advocate approach rather than simply having him repeat himself. It was a little annoying at parts, I admit, upon revisiting it and listening.
@@DadSavesAmericawell, most of us don't know any of you from outside the podcast world. You keep on superimposing your own perspective on every point instead of giving leeway to the interviewee to make his point completely.
While I think the interviewer formulated them sometimes badly and in cringy way, at the same time he's supposed to ask for arguments that support guest's theories, since without arguments theories are useless
Two of the most intellectually thought provoking people on TH-cam having a conversation.
Good stuff gentlemen
Rudyard is more of an intellectual
@@TarasBohdan Definitely. Nothing intellectual about the interviewer.
I see Rudyard, where's the other one?
Rudyard makes a CRUCIAL mistakes in his talk about "Nazi apologists."
I know a number of young men who would be called as such, and each one has said the same thing to me. "I do not want to be making these arguments. I take no pleasure in having to say that Nazism or Fascism had "positives." I have been forced into making these arguments because I have been given only one alternative: my, my family's, my society's, and my history's complete and utter obliteration. I have been left with exactly two options, and I will choose the one that does not actively seek to destroy me at this moment."
None of these young men WANT this. (String pullers are another argument) They have been given no other choice. This is exactly the same thing that happened in Weimar Germany. Millions of young men had to choose: Do I allow my civilization, my link to all that has ever happened, be destroyed by groups that actively scream it should be so and that my very existence is evil. Or, do I commit atrocities I know are terrible in the slim chance that I am able to maintain said existence and civilization. Tell me you would not have done the same thing, I will call you a poor liar.
The more i hear this guy chime in the more i want rudyard just to do a talking video by himself 😂
Fair enough... he's got plenty of great ones!
America will have a civil war because legos got too expensive 😂
Ain’t nobody going to war for the new Harry Potter castle. Now the old style, count me in.
Rudy has been killin' it... It's well deserved recognition after all the time and effort he's put into his work. 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
I started listening to him when he was a 13 year old TH-camr. He never showed his face in his videos so I had no idea he was only 13. He was wise beyond his years even then.
Thanks for this interview. Lynch got me thinking about feminism as a reaction to no being able to afford a family, which was a great point.
Stupid. What does this young man know about women and career aspirations. Probably never had an actual conversatiin with a woman about what SHE wants.
@@dogeared100The problem with people like you, you know, feminists. You take the 1% of any category and broad brush apply to all men. In Rudyard's case, how many 23 year olds have the depth of knowledge and insight he has? Very few, practically none. So you use this as a way to dismiss him, because it takes most people significantly longer to have even a basic grasp of anything. Rudyard is not bound by your normieism.
Feminism is largely responsible for one person not being able to support a family as it nearly doubled the supply of labor while the demand for labor remained more or less the same.
@@mudblood9699 Yes.
I think it was Lenin who said the middle classes will be crushed by the hammer of taxes on the anvil of inflation. Behold the present.
2) Steven Pinker says it's never been better for humanity than now 😮
This is what Stefan Molyneux was saying in the last 10 years
where has that guy been and why has he been right this whole time
@JJ-vp3bd banned and memory-holed since 2016
That is a name I have not heard in a long time.
@@JJ-vp3bdto be fair he didn't help himself with that really strange video simping for some chick. Might have been Lauren Southern, I can't recall
@@thealienelite yeah, it was Lauren. She was starstruck with him at first but then his creepy stalking became apparent and she got away and talked publicly about it, and Stefan hasn't really been seen since. I mean that's not true but the algorithm hates him now
Jesus Chirst John is such a New Yorker. He thinks that new york is the whole fucking world so if it didn't happen in new york it didn't happen anywhere else jesus.
Yeah and he must be 50+ or close to it. What does he mean when he says “I’m almost old enough to be your dad”. Such a privileged urbanite thing to say.
That's not true he's just challenging his views to play devils advocate.
He may be naive and skeptical on certain topics in my opinion because he's worried about his son.
@@banjiman9869 If someone is laying out points and historical evidence for something and you only rebuttal is well While I was leaving in New York I was able to make a living there for the system works. You aren't playing devils' advocate you are being delusional. If he was really worried about his son he would look at the evidence and say "While i dont like/agree with what they is implying it holds merit and I should prepare my son for this possible outcome." Because I don't want my son coming back and saying "Dad you were given a heads up on this and instead of preparing me you ignored it and now that it's happening I am unprepared and can't really handle it now I have to struggle to get through it because you rejected what was in front of you."
Rejecting reality because you don't like how it makes you feel is a women like personality trait which isn't surprising seeing as how he openly with a smile started he is physically weaker then his wife. Makes sense that his course of action is "I dont like to think about this because I have a son and I want him to have a good life and not have to deal with this so if I just reject it full stop It wont become an issue.
Banji you are exactly right. I wouldn't have Rudyard on the show if I didn't think he was compelling and had important things to say. But I felt it was important to play devil's advocate partly because I overwhelmingly agree with his analysis and partly because his civil war claim is bold enough that should get serious scrutiny.
I wish I didn't interrupt as much in retrospect, though. I'll have him back and chill out.
dude shoulda named his channel "muh wife saves America"
"When she's not bench pressing 350 or having 'closed-door time' with Felix, her personal trainer"
@@willytodd2750 😂😂😂
@@LateNightRewrites😂
plausible deniability, thinking the government is not monitoring everything that you’re doing
Ridiculous statement. They are objectively not. There are not enough people to do any such thing. I know from direct experience with the FBI. They’re idiots and literally don’t know what is going on. You’re not important enough for them to be looking into you.
I enjoy listening to Rudyard, and have been watching is channel for a few years. I'm too old, but I would love to see his where his thoughts end up in 50-60 years, when he actually has experience, and maybe some wisdom. Right now his theories/views are based on his study of history (which sometimes repeats and sometimes does not) and anecdotes from his very limited time in this world.
Honestly even a whole lifetime of gaining experience and wisdom isn’t enough to have real perspective over such complex and nuanced functions of society and life on this planet. Probably the reason we evolved to be extremely collaborative and the more intelligent of us put a lot of weight on history as an indicator, because the two constants are human nature and seeking higher order/meaning.
I’m almost your age and I find his videos to be spot on. Mark Twain said, “History doesn’t repeat, but it does rhyme.”
Based comment
His conclusions are based entirely on vibes, gut feelings, and his own approximations. Very wishy-washy. Of course yahoos on youtube will say he's "spot on" but what do they know aside from their own anecdotes and gut feelings?
History literally always repeats. It’s cyclical and easily proven.
"just stick it out" lol, you will not be promoted, companies hire outside of company for managers, upward mobility requires luck job hopping
Yup, Millennials figured this out a while ago. The only reliable way to get consistent pay raises and promotions is to job hop every 2 to 3 years. If you're good at your job companies don't want to peomote you and train a new person to fill your shoes. Also ironically higher paying management positions often require less experience in their field than many of the lower paid technical jobs. My direct supervisor is awesome because she did my job before getting promoted to her current position but her boss has never done anything in my career field, he only has management experience. He's decent at his job but he really has no idea how my job works so when he tries to give feedback everyone knows to just kinda ignore him and ask people with experience.
or nepotism
@@orimoreau3138which is a huge problem in industries where they have imported H1B from India, they are extremely tribal, and lobhy aggressively to get more into the country. This is find to be a big problem if we don't get this stopped soon.
Exactly.
I see the businessmen as getting rich by destroying the previous generation's incentive structure.
Then the next generation adapts and corpos ask "Why aren't people working hard?"
Man whatifalthis is going far. When i discovered him he was just leaving his alternate history stuff.
Well done
Is this channel shadow banned? It’s way to good for how little views these videos get.
It will be, yes.
I'm subscribed and don't even get notifications about the new videos. I have to check for myself.
I agree. This is a great channel but isn’t really popular
I have my suspicions, but we keep working on trying to do better and figure things out. We started publishing in 2022 but made some changes last year that I think were for the better and have been growing steadily since. Stuff takes time to grow.
Why are people complaining about the interviewer? I enjoyed the “push back” on Rudyard… he was able to flesh out his ideas 🤷🏻♂️
There's no new movies. I'm sure we're all agreeing. Dad says yes there are, until it's pointed out that they're unwatchable and he agrees ... I'm hoping Rudyard can save Dad, because as it stands now, Dad's not going to be saving anything.
Dad cannot he saved
I have never heard of this young man, I found this conversation interesting and challenging.
his channel popped up on my feed months ago. ive listened to a few of his videos. I didnt know he wasnt educated in the standard way, but rather is a "self taught scholar", which imho is probably better suited in some instances simply b/c one can use the internet to gather, compile, analyze, etc info/data and come up with conclusions based thereof (of course that would involve conclusions across a spectrum from highly unlikely, to highly probable and all in between).
Check out his video essays. There are very thought provoking.
A 100 grand driving a truck? I drove a truck. If you want to have a life and a family, you ain’t gonna make 100 driving a truck. The years of making big bucks driving a truck are long gone.
There's something very unlikable about the "Dad" guy.
But his wife is amazing.
He has no sympathy for young men or young white men. His response to 95% nonwhite, non-male hiring by corporate America was "Just like, go succeed bro". He comes off as the rich former corporate guy that he actually is.
@@willytodd2750 good one :)
@willytodd2750 "not only could she beat ME up, she could do the same to you:
He’s politically correct to not alienate his wife who is most likely it him by the balls.
"my wife has more masculine force than you or I or the two of us combined"
Sorry bro that sucks
I would have gotten quite angry if I was the guest
This dude can’t let Rudyard finish a thought without interjecting his opinion.
Boomer mentality.
3000 applications to get 1 minimum wage job is the biggest glaring example of why men of skill, experience, and education and the unskilled both are just dropping out.
This is the yputuber that helped develop and understand a lot of my worldview from a certain point starting 2023
You dismiss Rudyards point of women giving no pushback against tyranny by saying your wife holds her own.
And yes, I'm sure she does in the playground of your house where there's no risk and the boundaries are set and safe.
But are you telling me if the gestapo / fbi kicked down your door and said "you're coming with us" she would fight?
Let's not kid ourselves.
I'll give you a longer reply on this issue since you've engaged in good faith.
I didn't dismiss his point. I agreed with his point, noting that it was an "on average" situation, which is why I brought up my wife (who Rudyard has met) simply to note that the average isn't everything.
This is the problem with become too reactionary to woke satanic communism. One can become what they despise.
Are women on-average physically weaker than men? Obviously.
Are women on-average more inclined towards concern and hyper-vigilance/neuroticism? Yes, and for good reason (to keep babies alive).
but...
Are mothers ferocious defenders of their children? Yes. Are they brave in such situations? On average, YES. Is that mirrored in the mammalian kingdom? Of course it is.
Men on-average, are warriors and workers, and oriented towards things and action and risk. Women, on-average, are nurturers and oriented towards people and socializing and avoiding risk. You can see this crystal clear in the distribution of male-to-female ratios in professions.
None of this would even be worth talking about because it's completely frigging obvious facts... only it's become "right wing" and "heterodox" because the left is insane and asserts black-slate, brain-dead nonsense in pursuit of destroy civilization.
I don't think it's useful to play into the communist zombies hand by mirroring their nonsense in bizarro reverse.
Men and women are different and complimentary and essential partners. Husbands SHOULD admire their wives and put them, especially in public, on a bit of pedestal. That's called chivalry. Wars have been fought over this shit FOREVER.
The 20 year-olds coming home from WWII wouldn't talk about women the way some of these commenters are, and that's a sign of culture degeneration. I'll hold out hope that the crowd will eventually, you know, grow the hell up.
@@DadSavesAmerica I've been hoping you'd respond to someone, Gad you have, because what some of these commenters are doing is precisely what Rudyard was describing with saying how people call him a cuck for not wanting wholesale genocide to occur (as a Christian speaking to other Christians).
Psychotic larping extremist views coming out only online where these people can engage in such things without real backlash. Same thing as the rabid woman haters do, all in all, attacking a man speaking positively of his wife 😂
He’s full of shit and clearly never been around a real conflict where women are present. Just go to a rough bar and watch a bar fight break out, the women run away or hide behind their men, even the alleged tough women
Or just watch women cops get absolutely owned by regular unarmed average men
Dad should know rate of inflation is not calculated using the same method as the 1970s. So inflation is just as bad using the same method of calculation.
This is because of the change in how housing in measured, right? Yeah, I forgot about that. Even so, the 70s were ROUGH.
Nothing of importance is included in inflation figures now. I’d say in the last few years we have had 30-50 percent inflation on most things
The government lies in every single stat they release. Inflation is 2x what uncle scam claims
😮9 to 5. Come home to an empty house.no relationships. Everything extremely expensive. No futue. A cog in the system. Dead end world
Love Rudyard, but god is this interviewer out of touch and painful to listen to
"just get a job!!" I cant. I got out of high school 6 months ago and I have applied to literally every single minimum wage no-experience job and small business in my area and i have not heard a SINGLE word back.
It’s awesome these guys are willing to openly discuss men’s social issues. That said, for feminists, it’s a zero sum game. You cannot address men’s issues without giving the impression of disadvantaging women and society will not tolerate even the perception of disadvantaging women.
If you are trying to compare 'inflation' now with 'inflation' in the 70s and 80s you have to realise that the way of measuring price inflation has been changed and manipulated downwards so much that you are comparing apples and oranges.
Plausible deniability is just lying. No wonder we're in a world of hurt if such dishonesty is so rampant, flippant, and shrugged off.
The way they describe it seems more like a cover story. It's like if you are doing something illegal in the woods behind your house and tell your neighbor before hand you are going check if the ditches are clogged.
@Brent-z2s That's still lying.
@@emilymiller1792 it is but what you are covering up is worse than the lie.
@Brent-z2s
You reinforced my original point. "Needing" plausible deniability for terrible behavior compounds the original dishonesty.
@@emilymiller1792 my girlfriend says that the lie or cover up is worse than the action. So if someone with a Russian accent asks if my neighbors are Ukrainian and I lie and say no. Is that by itself a bad thing
If you don't know who Barbarossa is of MGTOW fame, then you have no idea what's really going on right now and will join the ranks of hundreds of people who he said would try in vain to make sense of this storm.
Barb retired years ago, no way these guys have hear about him
@@djangogeek And yet the talking points persist without offering credit.
@@Marcara081 what "his" talking points ? explain please
@@orimoreau3138 You want a list of quotes? Find him on TH-cam. Waste your own time.
@@orimoreau3138 f
"Jobs aren't zero sum, right?"
Holy **** no, they are zero sum.
The pie can get bigger, but at any one point there are a finite number of positions.
This perspective was never present even during the bleak Carter years. Ronnie let loose american optimism, that's what our economy needs now.
@@r2dad282
Delusion is a common historical mind set.
As evidenced by that quote from the host and your claims.
@firebornliger I'm pointing to history, which you are calling delusion. Really? Read some history.
@@r2dad282
No, you're pointing to a historic mindset.
Mindsets are often rooted in delusion.
Many of them are good delusions that help motivate people toward good actions, but delusions they remain.
Zero sum means that one person's gain comes at another's expense. When someone gets hired, that's not at the expense of the person who didn't, since you can't lose something that isn't yours to begin with.
Being a man dating today is like a starving person hoping for bread. Being a woman dating today is being a person surrounded by bread and hoping you get a steak.
1:23:58 as one of the people who has “stuck it out” and advanced in a career, this is wholly old man nonsense. It’s still really hard and it still feels miserable. It also doesn’t take into account that since the pandemic, most people have taken what is essentially a 50% pay cut due to inflation. I was making pretty good money in 2019, and I’ve gotten raises since, but it doesn’t nearly cover the huge jump in price of just about everything. I’ve looked at changing careers, but it involves taking at least a 60% reduction in pay, not accounting for education costs. I cannot imagine starting out in this economic environment, it has to be horrible for gen Z.
Whoa Rudyard. Take it easy on Alex Jones lol. He’s a little better than a broken clock.
He's far worse. He's certainly not right twice a day.
@ righter than you are.
@@9mwood That statement was short, stupid and badly expressed. A lot like Alex Jones.
@9mwood Rudyard says a lot of stuff too. Let's see how often he's right by the time he's Alex's age.
Alex has been right on some pretty huge and unexpected things.
@@faustoferrari4303 righter than you, Muhammed.
As a black male born n rasied in philly. I've experienced the non woke and later the woke while in college. It is two different planets and the sad part is the woke people think they are doing the world a favor. The non-woke see the other half as prey or in disgust. Enough transplants moved to philly to fundamentally change how the city feels now. It's not even close to the same as 6 or even 3 years ago. Too many non-philadelphians ruined the city. It's a constant struggle between natives and transplants. More poverty and more new rich people to rob. Seeing the same struggle take place everywhere though. I see license plates from almost all 50 states now and even CANADA. What happened to making your own town great instead of moving?
Rudyard is 1000% correct when he's talking about the school and work cultures. When he talks about the headphones thing the interviewer asks incredulously, "have you worked at any of these jobs, where do you get this from?"
Meanwhile, I have worked plenty of those jobs, did experience those things he's talking about. He's spot on.
Really interesting. He had a peterson vibe of saying things you already knew but didn't.
Tremendous Respect for both of you! Thanks for doing this!
Much appreciated!
Really appreciated the take on drawing the line before the neo-Nazis. I had a similar moment when I was a moderately successful right-leaning TH-camr a while back. Lots of that type trying to win me over. Happy for you.
I’m just over 30 and I resonate with this.
I keep hearing that Civil War is going to happen, but no one ever points out who will actually be doing the fighting, and specifically or what reason.
Like, I mean, what's going to happen? On some particular day it will be announced that we're in a Civil War, so I need to pick a random person to get violent with?
Why do that when I can simply continue to live my life, work the job, grab lunch as usual, etc? Seems strange to me. Like, it just seems like far to much work to pick a group to be questionably angry at, when I can just play Street Fighter with my friends in the evening.
Read between the lines. He makes an absurd claim. Then complains how everything is expensive and collapsing which is true. Does not elaborate on how anything will play out. Then gets more publicity from podcast to podcast. Bro is grifting his way through a mortgage 😂 gotta respect the hustle
@@peterbougioukos1423 "Bro is grifting his way through a mortgage" HAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Well said.
That's not how it works. A ton of the prerequisites are in place, it's the trigger that is the unknown. Just go look up what started previous revolutions & civil wars. Same thing, a bunch of escalating factors that precipitate a major social unrest. What varies is that ignition point. If you look up like 3 separate historical examples you will see 3 different triggers but it will make more sense to you after knowing what those are. If makes you see how it could happen plausibly.
@@spudruckus7297 "look up what started previous revolutions & civil wars."
I've read about this in the past. The first Civil War makes sense why it happened. And if I lived right before it happened, it would be very clear to me why it would happen. These are very different times. The fights that we've seen happen already in modern times, like the White House attack, and the Tikki Torches situation up north, it's still vague to me why those groups did what they did. I've heard their reasons but none of it makes logical sense to me.
Kind of like when Rudyyard said, "if you're a young white man, the people in charge don't want you there". But those same people in charge champion white non hetero men, so how does this make sense? It just doesn't. If this was one of other reasons why someone wanted to fight, my eyebrows would remain raised for quite some time.
If Civil War does happen, I'll probably be one of those folks who will be confused why the fighting is happening.
@@AetheriusComics previous, as in other countries. Our own civil war was a bit of an outlier to the trend.
Lynch is a fascinating character. I laugh at the people who mock him (Rudyard you know who I'm talking about lol) as I know multiple actual PROFESSIONAL historians who love his content.
Is “dad saves America” Jewish?
I’m 100% Italian descent and very much Catholic… but… who cares?
@@DadSavesAmerica it’s not obvious to you why that would matter to a large degree?
People saying Dad keeps interrupting, but this is a good conversation between two men.
You talk about the fact that most young people can't afford to have a house or car and be able to feed themselves and then you say that you think the middle class has shrunk because the upper class has grown. Absolute cope.
Are you dumb? The middle class money went to the upper class in the transfer of wealth. What are you doing here normie? 😅
Regarding the Columbia protests, the problem is that we don't train children to be critical thinkers. Rush Limbaugh used to say something to the effect: "Don't tell people what to think; teach them how to think." When you train someone to be submissive and swallow whatever you tell them, you make them vulnerable to any charismatic guru or garbage propaganda that comes along. This is especially a problem with how many parents raise their daughters, which is why so many of those students were girls. Many parents of daughters, whether with the good intentions of protecting them or because they are dismissive of their abilities, just pat their daughters on the head and don't bother challenging them intellectually or in any other life skills.
Morley Winograd, education advisor to Al Gore, wrote a white paper (that no longer appears on the web) about why millennials should not be taught critical thinking, but instead taught how to rely on 'trusted sources' like google and peers.
@@CarolannBrendel people who support the Je ws are t thinking nor do they know any history but carry on
We are in a gynocentric social order which is fundamentally an emotional society based on security and harm avoidance. If we taught critical thinking and rationality as a model for looking at education, it would unravel the social order. Boys and men by a much larger magnitude than is already waking up, would ask why they are holding up society for little to no reward. And the answer would be, because you're expected to.
Known critical thinker, Rush Limbaugh
Lord knows we have too many women in positions of power that are incompetent intellectually. A lot of it could stem from failure to teach female children to think critically, but much is also due to women’s natural leanings towards safety, security, and comfort over all. Also, teaching our young boys without proper male role models, or teaching them that male character qualities are “toxic” isn’t helping. There’s such a horrible cluster of problems 🤦
I'm still waiting for someone to describe what a civil war looks like here in the U.S.. Who is fighting whom? As mentioned in this episode, there's not the same clear division between the two clashing ideological sides as it was between the North and the South, so I'm looking for someone to explain what they mean by a civil war. Things veered off into another direction as soon as this question was asked, and they never came back to this point to answer it.
the realisic vs. the ideological.
PERIOD.
I just posted the same question. He starts off by claiming 1000 deaths by April and then jerks himself off the rest of the podcast.
Republican vs. Democrat
@@peterbougioukos1423 😂 Right!
First time viewer of your channel.
I follow Rudyard and his channel and decided to watch because of him.
Got to say, I’m glad I did.
You’ve just picked up another sub. I liked the back and forth between the two of you. Seems we have a lot of views in common.
Glad you’re here, my friend. Rudyard’s video essay are really excellent and I was pumped to learn he lived in Austin.
@@DadSavesAmericaI really appreciate the way you think and your humility to have such a young intellectual on and you enjoy his content. I know some men would just dismiss him on his age but he is wise beyond his years.
This conversation was great i wish it was 3 hours long
Dad’s Wife Saves America
Lynch is 99.9 percent right about everything he says
No, he isn't. Nobody is. Ludicrous thing to say.
you're literally insane. he's a coward who would never have a discussion with anyone outside his own echochamber
One part of the conversation caught my attention in particular because it caused an emotional response when i heard it. That emotion being mild anger.
It was when you were talking about trying to hire now days. You said show up to work on time, dont ask about PTO in the interview etc.
Getting to work on time, yeah fair enough.
Not asking about PTO in the interview?
Nowdays companies wont even post a salary range for a position. They arent applying to your company because they worship the ground you walk on. They are applying because they have bills to pay.
A job offer is a legal contract. Your discussing terms of a labor contract as part of that interview. In Europe PTO is government mandated so it doesnt have to be discussed. Here it does.
Are you going to pay me enough to pay my bills and feed the family? If not i need to know that. Are you going to have enough PTO for a sick kid in daycare, and my elderly parent who needs to be taken to the hospital after a fall? Am i going to be reprimanded because i had to take off to let the cops in for a wellness check on my wife? (That actually happened three months into my current job.)
Life happens. Are you going to work with me, and treat me like a human? These shouldnt be interview ending questions for you, and if they are you might need to take a step back, and ask yourself some hard questions.
My last employer made tires. Company starts with a B. Coworker got wrote up for a no call no show while she was at work. How? She had to leave when her shift ended to pick up her kid from day care. Person behind her called out. Boss says she has to stay an extra four hours with thirty minutes notice. She obviously says she cant make arrangements in thirty minutes, she has to leave. Not staying for overtime despite having already worked her full shift got her written up no call no show while she was still at work.
No, im sorry. Companies expect you to be greatful for the privilege of just barely scrapping by. But its okay! They'll buy you pizza three times a year! All while my current manager just built 3 new houses on 300 acres for him and his kids. Meanwhile one coworker has to sell scrap metal between paychecks to have enough gas to make it to work. All while hes eating rice so he can make sure his kids have meat and vegetables. One guys car is falling apart, and cant afford to fix it, etc, etc.
No. Absolutely not. Not wanting to discuss PTO during a legal contract negotiation for employment is unacceptable. PTO is part of the american pay package now, especially for salary positions. Not wanting to discuss it makes you look dishonest at best.
In this episode, incel tells us why incels are going to start a Civil War. Lmao.
Yep, unfortunately incels won't do anything. They are the biggest cowards and complainers of all time.
Man this guy needs to stop interrupting his guest jeez!
I literally stuck it out of a job for over 10 years, trying to wait to be the manager being an exemplary employee showing up on time doing more than my share and being on task and on time and I was never rewarded. It is better to be liked than to do a good job. I’m so upset with what have said because it doesn’t work.
I’m a 46 year old male. What is being talked about specifically past this point 50:36 in the video I believe also applies to me.
I lost my career in Dec. 2020 due to 💉 lockdowns, and due to my position becoming obsolete at a Fortune 500 company, since I had to be in corporate HQ’s to do the duties my career required.
Later, in Sept. 2021, I had some major, physical health issues arise, and have been essentially recuperating from that/jobless since.
I’ve now gotten to the point where I am applying to as many jobs I can find in a pretty small town, with not as many “larger” businesses/potential job openings available for me to apply to, based off of my previous work experience.
I firmly believe that because I honestly (morals and ethics) answer the race question (white, non-Hispanic) that I’m being discriminated against due to the predominance of corporate diversity culture.
I know I will find something eventually however, I won’t deny that: people are losing jobs/monthly new job #’s are being manipulated to the “high side” because of political pressures from our standing, election time government (only to have downward revisions come out after the media hype train touts the “great” new job #’s, which most people don’t know of/care to actually look into), and some other outlying factors.
Lastly, I’m not completely convinced about Rudyard’s prognostications for civil w@hr, as enough people now, and more every day are becoming aware of these broken realities that we face. I think it will take more years to get to C.W. levels, and think a civilian revlutn against the folks in the big ⚪️🏠 is more likely, before C.W.
P.S. Ain’t it a d@mn sh🤬me we have to t@lk like thi$ h€r£?
I wonder how many old men across endless strings of ruined empires believed they were still a ways off from the Civil War they or their sons would die in?
How does the common folk survive? Do you think it will become a post apocalypse nightmare?
@@danielantonyuk6446hard to say but as we further and further displaced and disenfranchised in our own country by foreigners both legal and not, while simultaneously propagandizing them all that it is wytee's fault, this is just going to continue to ratchet up ethnic tension, so there's that.
The risk of a generation having to get out of the room that held their basinet 30 years ago.