OpenFOAM: SnappyHexMesh - Layers

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 10

  • @poha-pursuit_of_happiness
    @poha-pursuit_of_happiness 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Good Job foamDude :) waiting eagerly for the next vedio of snappyHexMesh(advanced options) in order to obtain better layers over the geometry. so that the yplus value stays within the range.

  • @jekavorobianinov2445
    @jekavorobianinov2445 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do you know how to obtain uniform distribution of boundary layers (especially at inner corners)?

  • @ratulxy
    @ratulxy 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome tutorial dude!!

  • @sciencemohammad128
    @sciencemohammad128 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    where is the next one??

  • @muhammadchoudhry5864
    @muhammadchoudhry5864 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    can you run a tutorial on snappy hex Mesh with relative sizes false; (for layer size). Please!

  • @ariminin
    @ariminin 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the nice tutorial! Is it possible to start the simulation as well? I tried to start the simulation with simpleFoam, but didn't get a result.
    .

  • @ironsimonx4221
    @ironsimonx4221 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tank you, really good Video!
    Does soneone know why all my cells are divided into triangles?
    In your case its only cells close to refinement...

  • @sahib_kamran
    @sahib_kamran 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thanks!

  • @laidmessaoudi5335
    @laidmessaoudi5335 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you. Merci.

  • @hakuhakuji
    @hakuhakuji ปีที่แล้ว

    This tutorial is not exactly correct. relativeSizes parameter does not define what set of parameters will define layes (first layer, final layer thickness as well as expansion ratio can be set independently). It defines whethet or not the measures are taken relative to the size of adjacent cell or in absolute values (meters). The second mistake is that the size of the layers are not computed by dividing on the factors, but multiplying with them: the final layer will not be as twice as small as the adjcent cell, but actually two times bigger!