Twenty three years ago is more recent but not 'recent.' Besides, Dallas and San Fran are still some of the profitable and popular sports teams in the world, while Saint Louis cant even keep a team. 😅
The 49ers came so close this year. Damn it! Although funny enough it shouldn't even count as an SF title if they won since they play in Santa Clara which is 45 minutes to an hour south of SF and really should be a San Jose title since Santa Clara is literally right next to San Jose.
St. Louisan here--this is so true. And it's worth noting that it's not just the NFL. We've lost a baseball team (the Baltimore Orioles were once the St. Louis Browns) and an NBA team (the Atlanta Hawks used to be in St. Louis).
I grew up a baseball Cardinals fan, and liked the football Cardinals too. (I lived nowhere near St.Louis, I just liked your teams). I have wondered why there hasn’t been a pro basketball team in St. Louis since the ABA’s Spirits. And no college in St. Louis has ever been prominent in basketball, despite the city being host to the Final 4 umteen times.
@@gregbaldwin5144 Yeah, I'm pumped over the BattleHawks, because I love football and I want spring football to succeed. But, then again, if I didn't love spring football, I'd be crying too, so I understand your reaction.
I remember as kid watching the St. Louis Cardinals play and they were in the NFC East back then. I lived in South Florida and was a Dolphin fan but I would always pull for the Cardinals, and Otis Anderson too he was a Hurricane in his college days. Memories of Jim Hart and Neil Lomax.
I thought this was a Urinating Tree video at first from the thumbnail, but I was pleasantly suprised by how well constructed this video was It's criminal of how many subs you have, only being 600, hoping you find more success in the future!
Surprised you didn't mention Super Bowl 53 when the Rams failed to avenge their loss to the Patriots, in one of the lowest scoring Super Bowls in the modern era
As an 80s kid in Missouri, we had a joke: A kid was sitting in the witness chair at divorce court. The judge asked him, "Young man, which parent would you rather live with? Your mother, or your father?" The kid replied, "Well, judge, I don't wanna live with dad because he beats me. But I don't wanna live with mom either because she beats me too!" The judge asked, "Well, then, who DO you want to live with?" The kid answered, "I wanna live with the St. Louis football Cardinals, 'cuz they never beat anybody!"
St Louis needs its own team that was birthed here. The Cardinals and Rams were teams that weren't ours, we were "foster parents" whose job was to keep those teams temporarily.
Correct, Cardinals are the oldest NFL team and started in Chicago. Rams started in Cleveland before moving to Los Angeles. But I will say this. St. Louis is a baseball city not a football city. I moved from Topeka, KS to Jacksonville, FL in the summer of 2000. Rams had just won the Super Bowl that January and I saw more Cardinals and Blues stickers on cars than I did the Rams when I drove through St. Louis during dinner rush hour traffic.
Great video! As a St. Louisan and former diehard Rams fan I feel your pain. If the XFL/UFL ever folds I like to dream that the owners somehow make a deal with the NFL to have the Battlehawks join as an expansion team or something
This is a great video! What sucks is my family and I always talk about how we miss the Stl rams. I actually threw away all my Rams stuff when they moved.
Even though they had losing seasons I still stuck with them and watch religiously. Oh well, maybe in an alternate dimension they stayed in STL. @@cardsfan1590
But,those cities still have NFL and/or NBA teams that are currently active while St. Louis has been whittled down to the MLB Cardinals and the NHL Blues. The other cities that you listed,at least,still have a chance at acquiring championship status in professional football or basketball. The days of NBA and ESPECIALLY NFL affiliations in St. Louis are a thing of the past. Unfortunately,like many other Midwestern American cities,St. Louis is on life-support and will never attain the popular status it once enjoyed,historically. Nothing wrong with having a little bit of local pride,however.
@@myleslong5584 I agree with you. I live in Southern Ill. Most people around here think of St. Louis as "their" city. The baseball Cardinals are very popular. But St. Louis has lost a lot of population and it has a terrible crime problem. Yes, I think St. Louis's glory days are over.
I wasn't alive at that time (I was born in 1995, the year the Rams moved), but I have done alot of research on the Rams move to St. Louis. From what I gathered, the Rams NEVER should've been allowed to move to STL in the first place. In fact, they initially WEREN'T allowed to move, until the NFL was forced to allow it after Georgia threatened a lawsuit (it looks like the lawsuit was more of a veiled threat, but the league was still reeling from Al Davis' lawsuit to move the Raiders to LA in 1982). "Once the bridges have been burned and people get turned off on a sports franchise, years of loyalty is not respected and it is difficult to get it back. By the same token, there are millions of fans in that area who have supported the Rams in an extraordinary way. The Rams have 50 years of history and the last 5 or so years of difficult times can be corrected." - Paul Tagliabue after league owners rejected Frontiere's bid to move the Rams on March 15, 1995.
As a fellow St.louisin, it is a shame that the Rams left. But i was never really a fan of them. Became a fan of the AZ Cardinals during the Kurt Warner run to the super bowl era as well because of my dad owning a bunch of old cardinals stuff from the 70s. Great video by the way. Popped up in my recommendation and thought it looked interesting.
I was born in LA and was a Rams fan from the late '60s. The only reason they moved is because their good owner, Carroll Rosenbloom, died by drowning, and was replaced by their bad owner, his widow. It never made much sense to move out of a West Coast city that had a pretty good football tradition (Rams led the league in attendance in the '60s and '70s, and USC and UCLA had popular college football programs) to a midwestern city with less than a fifth of LA's population. St. Louis took advantage of its opportunity, eventually, but I think the writing was always on the wall for the St. Louis Rams.
I moved to St Louis in 94, and left in 97. I was a huge Rams fan, and remained a fan until they left. What I never understood, the stadium was LESS than 20 years old when the team bolted. Why, what was wrong with the stadium, or was it all Stan Donkey being a jackass just wanting more money?
The stadium wasn't very great even being as new as it was, but that was about 25% of the REAL reason they left, the other 75% is Kroenke being the devil incarnate
The Dome isn't nearly as bad a stadium as some say, but it was clearly built on the cheap and rushed so that St Louis could get a team back ASAP. If they took their time and built a stadium with a little more personality, like Busch Stadium, it would have lasted longer. I went to a few BattleHawks games this past year, and the Dome was a perfectly average venue, not bad, not great.
A little context to the Cardinals moving to Phoenix: the Eagles were expected to move there in 1985. It was pretty much a done deal. But owner Leonard Tose sold the team under the agreement that they stayed in Philly.
@@thesuperostrich So do I. I HATE the Commanders name! That's not to say I'm a fan of "Redskins", but it's just what I've always known them as (and will continue to know them as)
Glad this video came my way great stuff and yeah crazy that between the cardinals and rams there was only like 8 successful seasons in St Louis. Also weird that I wish the rams never switched uniforms but also thought the navy gold and white was a better look. I also always move Washington to STL in madden
As a Rams fan from the time I was young (1960's, 1970's), I am biased about the lighter, royal blue like uniforms from my childhood. Believe me, I understand the hurt of the Rams moving. 1994 and 1995 were not a good time for me. By the time the Rams came home, I was a Patriots and Packers fan and didn't care a lot about it.
That really is about it. The Rams were the best and worst of times for NFL football in St. Louis. I would say 4 very good seasons from the Rams, 3 years of Don Coryell Big Red teams in the 1970s, and 2 or 3 teams in the 1960s the best. The Big Red mainly mediocre.and there was not a playoff for most of the 1960s unless there was a tie for first place so never a playoff win. The 1964 playoff win he mentions of the Cardinals over Green Bay was actually only a short lived playoff games of runner-ups Green Bay in the West and St. Louis in the East with no advavcement. I followed it all and as seen by the Battle Hawks attendance wish St. Louis would get an expansion team but like he says owners committed to the region for private invesment like just happened for the new soccer stadium and team is key. It did make sense Stan Kroenke would want the much larger TV market of L.A.. . It is obvious seeing what has been happening for the Dodgers.
Actually, the first St. Louis NFL team was when the Cincinnati Reds season got suspended. The St. Louis Gunners were brought up to NFL status after that for just one season in 1934 and then just moved to another league.
Spot on. I’ve lived in Saint Louis my entire life and cards and blues are beloved because they are basically part of the city. Even the new soccer team is selling out. The rams seemed soulless by the end and they never became a part of the city. No relocation is ever going to work in St. Louis.
You didn’t mention the first major league team (AFL/NFL). From 1931-1940, the Saint Louis Gunners played in Saint Louis. They were in both the NFL and AFL during their years in Saint Louis. When they were purchased in 1940, they were moved and merged with the Cleveland Rams, with the former Gunners players now playing as a part of the Rams. When Georgia brought the Rams Saint Louis, it was not only a homecoming for her, but also a sort of homecoming for the Rams as well.
The Rams were in LA since the '50's and the Owner Carrol Rosenbloom died mysteriously, in 5ft of water; his side piece a Las Vegas Showgirl (Georgia Frontiere) took control of the Team and moved them to her Hometown of St Louis after running the Franchise into the ground in Anaheim. Allegedly, she received over $200M under the table.
@@ChillydontCap She actually WAS his sidepiece after he divorced his wife, who he was cheating on for YEARS with Georgia! BTW, the only reason she even inherited the Rams after Carroll's "accident" was because of a widows tax break law in California. Then she fired her son-in-law Steve (who SHOULD HAVE inherited the team, since he was already kind of running the team at the time) because he didn't get along with then-Rams general manager Don Klosterman (who himself would be fired a few years later after being thrown under the bus by Georgia during a breach of contract lawsuit by Fred Bryer in 1981).
My parent weren’t big on football while I was growing up but even they loved Kurt Warner. So much so that in later years when Warner took the AZ Cardinals to the Super Bowl, we all were routing for them.
I’ve got a coworker who normally lives downstate and said the Edward Jones Dome was terrible. He was sitting high up behind one of the endzones and was shocked by how obstructed his view was.
As a Los Angeles Rams fan I get your anger. I know it’s hard not only watching them win a Super Bowl at their home stadium, but be rewarded with large concerts and major international sporting events. I do like SoFi though. If I do ever visit St. Louis and wear Rams gear will there be issues? (it has the LA horn logo).
@@boogitybear2283 yeah my neighbor is an Allegiant Stadium season ticket holder so I know when he’s gone. Plus I guess this can be attributed to the Raiders staying in California until 2020 and Al Davis wanting a unified brand rather than being in one location.
@@boogitybear2283 Had the owners actually listened to their LA committee, the Rams don't leave St. Louis and that Vegas stadium (which just finished hosting a Super Bowl) would have instead been built in Carson, hosting the Raiders and Chargers.
I’d think you’d be fine brother. When the rams were in the Super Bowl a few years ago I saw people out wearing their rams gear. I didn’t say anything but thought it was dumb
THat Ricky Proehl catch was the most awesome thing that I had seen up to that point!! I was born in STL and I felt proud to be from there for the first time in a long time! LMAO
I remember what St. Louis couldn't get its act together during the last NFL expansion. The NFL was so desperate to have a team in St. Louis that they gave the city an extra month to shore up its bid package. St. Louis failed to do so, so the NFL reluctantly gave the franchise to Jacksonville. All the while, Baltimore had by far the best expansion package and greatly exceeded every NFL challenge. Kinda funny how things turned out, isn't it?
As I mentioned previously, Enos Stanley Kroenke played a very big role in Jacksonville getting the expansion team. Baltimore would eventually get an "expansion" team as the result of a stunt similar to Stan's pulled by a guy named Art Modell.
Why is it a city’s and/or state’s responsibility to build these billion dollar corporations the buildings they do business in? And no one say anything about revenue or jobs these corporations create, because that is just plain wrong. No way in hell should one tax dollar ever be given to any corporation, but especially ones that are part of the richest union of corporations in the country. (That’s what a sports league is) Especially since every major sports union of corporations has banned community ownership such as the most successful organization has. (The Packers have won the most nfl championships) But all this video was was a history of the cardinals and the rams. Where was the betrayal? That they moved after moving from other cities? But I am glad to hear you hate the Rams- same reason I am no longer a raider fan. The davises have been more interested in moving than winning.
Nice video- always wondered what the deal with St Louis and the NFL was. Y’all really showed up for the Battlehawks, so there’s clearly an appetite for football. My only criticism is sound quality is kinda all over the place- I’m sure as you do more videos like this, you’ll work out the kinks.
To piggyback off this comment, STL is a great sports city. The Cardinals and the Blues always draw huge crowds. And the Battle hawks to very very well for being in the XFL. The narrative that we are a baseball city is a so dumb. The Rams were consistently one of the worst teams in football after the GSOT era. No fan base is going to show up for a team that can barely win 5 games a year.
I haven't watched a nfl game since the Rams left 8 years ago. I refuse to watch a nfl game unless a team calls St Louis home and the stupid chiefs don't represent St Louis. The Battlehawks are my team and the entire nfl can suck it
Well made video. I had some issues with your microphone especially since I had headphones on and I could hear your lips move sometimes before you speak, but this was overall a solid video. I also found it hilarious how the only pic you used of the old LA Rams owner has someone with a Saints sweater nearby him. lol
>had the cardinals for way longer >cardinals not successful >cardinals leave >cardinals continue to suck *no anger towards them* >get the rams >rams win SB >rams leave >rams win another SB *seething with hate for the rams*
St. Louis, not Jacksonville, should have gotten the NFL expansion team in 1995. I still say the Jacksonville Jaguars should relocate to St. Louis and still remain in the AFC South with nearby cities Nashville and Indianapolis. Even the dome is still better than Jacksonville’s stadium. The Gator Bowl is a dump!
If you ever get a chance to hear Howard Balzer talk on the subject, who does he say was largely responsible for the Jaguars winding up in Jacksonville? Señor Stan himself, as he refused to work with the group pursuing the expansion team. But also to the point of the video: St. Louis needs an expansion team of their own. No more relocations.
Read this closely. That’s not happening. It won’t ever happen. Also, there is no “Gator Bowl”, there’s Everbank Field, and it’s getting a two billion dollar renovation, so it will look much like, ironically, SoFi. The Jags and the city are working together to ensure the Jaguars remain in Jacksonville for a long time.
“Better” football towns don’t lose two NFL teams. Jax continuously outdrew the Rams when they were in St Louis. Get the fantasy of the Jaguars moving out of your head. It’ll never happen.
The attendance only fell after the Rams sucked for a long time, 2007-15. If the Rams were still in St. Louis with the current coaching regime and winning seasons and superbowl trophy attendance would be back to greatest show on turf era.
THAT is why St. Louis doesn't get much sympathy from me. People like to say that the Rams left LA because of poor fan support, but forget that Georgia's actions in the late 80's and early 90's were one of the MAIN reasons for it! There are the conspiracies that Georgia intentionally destroyed the team after the 1989 season (which they made it to the NFC Championship) to create the environment to force the NFL to let her leave. That's not so much a conspiracy since it was TRUE. Look, what Kroenke did to St. Louis was shitty, I'll accept that. But I'd argue what Georgia did to SoCal was way worse in just HOW she literally forced the Rams out of LA.
I was a foreigner growing up loving the greatest show on turf of the St. Louis Rams. It was my dream to go see the game for real one day. I'd finally made it in 2015. Unfortunately, It was the last year that the team I had known and loved was the team I grew up with. Deep down, I still wished that Kroenke didn't exercise his right and sold his share to Shad Khan. He's a greedy business mogul who only cares about money and hometown royalty doesn't matter to him at all.
I grew up idolizing the St. Louis football Cardinals in the 1970s; probably the greatest team to not win a playoff game in that time period. After the Cardinals moved to Arizona and the Rams to St. Louis there was a rumor the Cards were considering moving again, this time to L.A. That never happened but if so the teams could have switched logos and been back where they were lol.
I thought of another example -- DC technically lost both the Twins and Rangers, although both franchises were called the "Senators" when they played in Washington, but they were two different franchises.
I think you would enjoy the 2009 Cardinals Football book by St. Louis sports historian Greg Marecek. I am old enough that I started following the Big Red their first season in STL in 1960. Their 1964 playoff win over Green Bay was actually only a game of the runner-ups Green Bay in the West and St. Louis in the East with no advancement. This is why it is said the Big Red in St. Louis never won a playoff game. According to Greg Marecek he blamed the separate St. Louis City and County governments for not agreeing on a new football stadium location, since Bill Bidwell initially wanted to stay in STL. Bill Bidwell thought Phoenix would right away help build a new stadium but it took 18 years so they played at Arizona State all those years. The Rams are a different story. As a result of the St. Louis lawsuit it was indirectly learned approval to move was only given when Stan Kroenke signed an indemnification agreement to compensate NFL owners in the event of any St. Louis lawsuits. This overrode the NFL Relocation committee recommending to keep the Rams in St. Louis and an initial relocation vote. No way though would it have been good for Stan Kroenke to stay in St. Louis. He had already bought land for SOFI years prior and wanted the large TV market of L.A. as did Roger Goodell and a few owners such as Jerry Jones of Dallas and Hunt of Kansas City per the initial relocation vote. Much came out in a long St. Louis Post Dispatch article of what had been learned during the lawsuit a few months after settlement. St. Louis was ready to build a new stadium but needed an owner to contribute. I think an owner would have been found but an owner similar to the private investors of the new soccer team to build a new stadium committed to the STL region is key. I enjoyed your video and agree with your conclusion at the end. Also a better resolution of the Rams moving should have been awarding St. Louis an expansion team.
Thank you for this video. I have a special connection to the Lou. Was also my first NFL game I attended. Was a huge fan and the origin story of my hatred for TB12 & the Pats. Eventually, I became a Seahawks fan but still had a special place in my heart for the Rams until they moved to LA. I've hated them ever since and hope every pass gets a pick6, every run gets fumbled out of the endzone, every kick sails wide right, and Nacua becomes a Seahawks while he's a sensation. Amen. Good stuff!
I must have buried the trauma of being a rams fan through the 2010’s. I started trying to remember players from that era and my brain went “Janoris Jenkins, Kenny Stills- okay that’s enough of that”. I also instinctively shudder when I see the camera pan across the chiefs sideline and Steve Spagnuolo pops out of nowhere
I've never even been to St. Louis but hasn't it always been said that any football team that is there will always play second fiddle to the Baseball Cardinals?
They probably would, but that doesn't mean the fanbase would be nonexistent. So long as the team isn't as awful as the Rams were that last decade in STL the fans will show up.
Chiefs wanted the rams to move. They’re were only a few teams that voted against the rams moving I think it was the eagles, packers, cardinals, and chargers
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Never again, NFL. Stay the hell out of St. Louis. (And Missouri too, for that matter - hopefully the Chiefs move across the border to Kansas.)
I don't if it is mentioned but st louis had 4 nfl teams St. Louis has been the home of four National Football League (NFL) franchises. Three years after the NFL was founded in 1920, it accepted the St. Louis All-Stars as a franchise for the 1923 NFL season. Then 14-7. The second franchise was the St. Louis Gunners. The Gunners were an independent professional football team that played the last three games of the 1934 National Football League season, replacing the Cincinnati Reds on the league schedule after the Reds' league membership was suspended.
@JoeErhart independent teams are not NFL. By that logic, every mayor city has lost multiple teams, and those cities I mentioned add another half dozen list teams
I was a huge Rams fan, and Isaac Bruce will always be my favorite player. What hurts the most was the way that owner trashed the city to get out. What will never make sense is that the Cardinals left because they wanted a new stadium and proceeded to play in a college stadium for 2 decades. Additionally, our hometown wouldn’t build the Cardinals a new stadium, but proceeded to build one with no official tenant just a handful of years later. Life is better as a Chiefs fan
The NFL, for some reason, hates our city. They did not want the Rams to be here in the first place. Even when the Dome was new it was made clear there would be no Suler Bowls played in STL (too far North...unlike Detroit I guess). We followed the NFL own rules to keep the team with an actionable stadium ready to be built and the Rams moved before San Diego or Oakland! I no longer watch the NFL. Why watch a league that publicly badmouthed where I live and had two teams move away? Give me college football. The teams may conference realign, but the teams don't leave their fans.
I give my regards to the St. Louis All-Stars (1923-1923) and the St. Louis Gunners (1931-1940) The First & Second NFL Teams in St. Louis, Before The Cardinals, and the Rams.
I think the biggest betrayal was from the cardinals, Rams were in LA since 1946 so they belonged in LA but Georgia Frontiere was from St Louis and wanted them there, which her husband rosenbloom would NOT have done, that is why LA does not name the name of Georgia Frontiere. Who really should hate is the Cardinals they were the original STL football team
We did our best to keep the Rams and I’m not even capping when I say that. And with the Cardinals too but I wasn’t born yet whenever they were playing in my hometown Saint Louis.
2 of those teams were from the era when teams folded/relocated left and right, so not really a relevant comparison. The Cardinals relocation I will admit was mostly on St Louis. Bill Bidwill was a crappy owner, but the city and county couldn't make up their minds on a new stadium so the Cardinals left. The Rams situation was the opposite. St Louis was fully prepared to build and fund a stadium, but Stan Kroenke negotiated in bad faith and broke NFL relocation policies to move to LA. (The NFL's media HQ just so happens to be on the SoFi Stadium campus... makes you think). Kroenke and the Rams had to pay STL nearly 800M for the move, and rightfully so.
What really sucked is when Jacksonville and Carolina got there expansion teams,St. Louis was a finalist that year,with a team set to be called the Stalions. If this wouldve happened it wouldve been a lot better than getting the rams,but we will always have a superbowl victory I guess
That Super Bowl team belonged to St. Louis. I believe there was only one player on the 'Greatest Show On Turf' that was in his rookie year when the Rams moved to St. Louis, and when the franchise moved back to LA, all them Super Bowl players were long gone. Instead of calling that team the St. Louis Rams, I'd prefer to call them the name they earned, 'The Greatest Show On Turf'
@TS-wh4ey and I think you're right. There might have been two players that came from LA that were on the superbowl team,Isaac Bruce for sure and maybe Demarco Far
@@cardsfan1590 I grew up in St. Louis county and recently moved from Jefferson County to the Ozarks. But I was a Big Red fan and of course the 'Greatest Show On Turf' SB victory was one of the most exciting championship moments in St.Louis history. I'll never forget that year Warner and Faulk led the team to that Super Bowl win. The catch by Bruce and the Mike Jones tackle, will forever be one of the greatest moments in St. Louis sports history. Yeah cherish the memory, but it's time to move on and support the Battlehawks and the new league now. They are a homegrown team and that league will continue to grow. I'm past done with the NFL.
I love my Rams I've been a fan since 1993 and still a Rams fan Haters gonna Hate I've would of Subscribed but till the end of watching u say u hate my team I won't. HAVE A GREAT DAY & STAY OFF THEM DRUGS MY GUY
The Rams weren't a long time OG St Louis team to begin with. They were from Cleveland in the 1920s before they moved to LA in the 50s and were there for 40 years. The Cardinals, though I can understand. Never made sense to me why they decided to leave in the first place
This was really god damn good. Fivepointvids & UTree need to see this.
Tom Grossi, Scooter. Brandon Perna, and others as well
@@PenguinNote67 Also Jaguar Gator 9
It’s sad and all, but I still find it funny that St. Louis still has more recent SB title than San Francisco and Dallas.
as arizona cardnals fan that hit hard
Twenty three years ago is more recent but not 'recent.' Besides, Dallas and San Fran are still some of the profitable and popular sports teams in the world, while Saint Louis cant even keep a team. 😅
The 49ers came so close this year. Damn it! Although funny enough it shouldn't even count as an SF title if they won since they play in Santa Clara which is 45 minutes to an hour south of SF and really should be a San Jose title since Santa Clara is literally right next to San Jose.
Whooopieee 🎉 just one 😂
@@MrDlt123Looks like somebody’s salty their franchise sucks haha
St. Louisan here--this is so true. And it's worth noting that it's not just the NFL. We've lost a baseball team (the Baltimore Orioles were once the St. Louis Browns) and an NBA team (the Atlanta Hawks used to be in St. Louis).
I grew up a baseball Cardinals fan, and liked the football Cardinals too. (I lived nowhere near St.Louis, I just liked your teams).
I have wondered why there hasn’t been a pro basketball team in St. Louis since the ABA’s Spirits. And no college in St. Louis has ever been prominent in basketball, despite the city being host to the Final 4 umteen times.
The Browns had to move. They weren't drawing flies and only had 1 pennant. Moving to Baltimore was the best thing that ever happened to them.
Interesting -- every team named the Browns ends up moving to Baltimore!
@@brianarbenz1329 that's actually a good point.
We used to have a MLS team before the current one and both the MLS team and the NBA team won a championship
If nothing else, St. Louis has the Battlehawks.
And They Draw better than any team in that league that should tell the NFL something
Do you hear yourself talking??? You are pumped over the "battlehawks" lol! I'm crying 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@gregbaldwin5144 Yeah, I'm pumped over the BattleHawks, because I love football and I want spring football to succeed.
But, then again, if I didn't love spring football, I'd be crying too, so I understand your reaction.
We've got Luther Burden and Brady Cook
@@gregbaldwin5144 Asshole
I remember as kid watching the St. Louis Cardinals play and they were in the NFC East back then. I lived in South Florida and was a Dolphin fan but I would always pull for the Cardinals, and Otis Anderson too he was a Hurricane in his college days. Memories of Jim Hart and Neil Lomax.
I thought this was a Urinating Tree video at first from the thumbnail, but I was pleasantly suprised by how well constructed this video was
It's criminal of how many subs you have, only being 600, hoping you find more success in the future!
Thanks.
And uh something something THA STILLERS ARE GOING TO THE SUPAH BAWL
@@PenguinNote67 the stillers always go to the super bowl, they just gotta Buy tickets to it
@@PenguinNote67PITTSBURGH'S GAHNTA DA SU-Oh wait, the Super Bowl is already over. Dang it :(
@@SortaNonymousMaybe next year
@@PenguinNote67awesome to see a fellow urinatingtree fan
I was born in 1998 and I grew up a Saint Louis Rams fan, but when they moved back to Los Angeles in 2016, they are dead to me.
I refuse to purchase any Rams gear. I cant help it, I still love them. Ill be a diehard when Kroenke dies(let me be clear Im not wishing this on him)
Surprised you didn't mention Super Bowl 53 when the Rams failed to avenge their loss to the Patriots, in one of the lowest scoring Super Bowls in the modern era
That Super Bowl was forgettable
The refs gave the Rams a spot in that game. No wonder they sucked
I force myself to forget that game.
@@gbalph4 I just say the Saints won 28-3
@@someperson3883 yeah we won 56 anyways and at home
As a STL native you hit the nail on the head. I don’t want another franchise to move to STL I want a team born and raised
As an 80s kid in Missouri, we had a joke:
A kid was sitting in the witness chair at divorce court. The judge asked him, "Young man, which parent would you rather live with? Your mother, or your father?"
The kid replied, "Well, judge, I don't wanna live with dad because he beats me. But I don't wanna live with mom either because she beats me too!"
The judge asked, "Well, then, who DO you want to live with?"
The kid answered, "I wanna live with the St. Louis football Cardinals, 'cuz they never beat anybody!"
The Rams also made it to the NFC Championship Game in 1985, where they got shut out by the Bears
As the Los Angeles Rams before they move in 1994
@@brandedmcgowan9414 right, but that’s the era the narrator was talking about when I made the comment.
@@JeffWiersma right on👍🏿
Relocation only hurts the fans
we pretty happy out in az😊
@inkwetrust-nq1sj are you though? Lol
Teams you get through relocation are bottom of the barrel trash.
St Louis needs its own team that was birthed here. The Cardinals and Rams were teams that weren't ours, we were "foster parents" whose job was to keep those teams temporarily.
Correct, Cardinals are the oldest NFL team and started in Chicago. Rams started in Cleveland before moving to Los Angeles.
But I will say this. St. Louis is a baseball city not a football city. I moved from Topeka, KS to Jacksonville, FL in the summer of 2000. Rams had just won the Super Bowl that January and I saw more Cardinals and Blues stickers on cars than I did the Rams when I drove through St. Louis during dinner rush hour traffic.
@@LdyVder They need a new stadium there and just keep the name "Battlehawks" and the teams current cool colors and all will be well !!
Just started watching, so happy it popped up in my recommended because this sounds interesting asf. This topic is never brought up enough.
There was once the Cardinals. There was once the Rams.
Now, the kaw is law.
KA KAW
Thank you to our host. Masterfully done. Learned a lot
Great video! As a St. Louisan and former diehard Rams fan I feel your pain. If the XFL/UFL ever folds I like to dream that the owners somehow make a deal with the NFL to have the Battlehawks join as an expansion team or something
This is a great video! What sucks is my family and I always talk about how we miss the Stl rams. I actually threw away all my Rams stuff when they moved.
Yep me and my dad had season tickets from there first year till they left,I turned most of my gear into work clothes.
Even though they had losing seasons I still stuck with them and watch religiously. Oh well, maybe in an alternate dimension they stayed in STL. @@cardsfan1590
I don't blame you.......st louis gear is worthless
Great video, very informative and well researched. I learned something new about both NFL teams that called St. Louis home for a time.
Just a reminder St. Louis has more superbowls and NBA championships than Phoenix, Atlanta, Charlotte, New Orleans and a few more.
But,those cities still have NFL and/or NBA teams that are currently active while St. Louis has been whittled down to the MLB Cardinals and the NHL Blues. The other cities that you listed,at least,still have a chance at acquiring championship status in professional football or basketball. The days of NBA and ESPECIALLY NFL affiliations in St. Louis are a thing of the past. Unfortunately,like many other Midwestern American cities,St. Louis is on life-support and will never attain the popular status it once enjoyed,historically. Nothing wrong with having a little bit of local pride,however.
@@myleslong5584 I agree with you. I live in Southern Ill. Most people around here think of St. Louis as "their" city. The baseball Cardinals are very popular. But St. Louis has lost a lot of population and it has a terrible crime problem. Yes, I think St. Louis's glory days are over.
I wouldn't put Minneapolis in there before 1960
@@coreylevine8095 Good call. I’ll edit.
All St. Louis has left are the baseball Cardinals and the Blues, and they both suck.
Why no one talk about Georgia Frontiere and her nonsene
Exactly. She was a a terrible person. Became an NFL owner by spreading.
@@Scott-vk4jv she murdered Rosenbloom
TF YOU BABBLING ABOUT
I wasn't alive at that time (I was born in 1995, the year the Rams moved), but I have done alot of research on the Rams move to St. Louis. From what I gathered, the Rams NEVER should've been allowed to move to STL in the first place. In fact, they initially WEREN'T allowed to move, until the NFL was forced to allow it after Georgia threatened a lawsuit (it looks like the lawsuit was more of a veiled threat, but the league was still reeling from Al Davis' lawsuit to move the Raiders to LA in 1982).
"Once the bridges have been burned and people get turned off on a sports franchise, years of loyalty is not respected and it is difficult to get it back. By the same token, there are millions of fans in that area who have supported the Rams in an extraordinary way. The Rams have 50 years of history and the last 5 or so years of difficult times can be corrected."
- Paul Tagliabue after league owners rejected Frontiere's bid to move the Rams on March 15, 1995.
@@saryphxWe know 5 years after that for the 1999 Rams
As someone who grew up near Oakland I’m sorry no city deserves to have their team leave twice
The Patriots were in negotiation too when Kraft took over
As a fellow St.louisin, it is a shame that the Rams left. But i was never really a fan of them. Became a fan of the AZ Cardinals during the Kurt Warner run to the super bowl era as well because of my dad owning a bunch of old cardinals stuff from the 70s. Great video by the way. Popped up in my recommendation and thought it looked interesting.
I loved that the Cardinals were both the football and baseball team of St. Louis when i was growing up.
7:31 National car Rental Field would be a lot happier for the new NFL team, a new MLR Team and UFL’s Battlehawks for St. Louis, Missouri
St. Louis deserves a expansion team .
They deserve to be where they are, hosting minor league football.
Not a Rams fan, but I maintain that moving away from their 2000's era uniforms was a huge mistake. Those unis was lit, their current one's suck ass.
Agree. Their current unis suck. The combo of gold and blue was nice and different
as a Rams fan, I agree. We had an amazing logo and uniforms, then they ruined it because they wanted that modern LA look.
The logo was one of the best in all of sports, along with the colors. Good thing Stan got rid of it to fit into his corporate LA look
always an oldhead complaining about the new
@@therhinoization5 its just a fact that the new shades of yellow and blue are ugly af.
Racine is a street in Chicago. The Maroon or Cardinal Red uniforms were hand me downs from University of Chicago.
The Cardinals i understand this was founded by a Racist street gangs in Chicago Reagan Colt
I was born in LA and was a Rams fan from the late '60s. The only reason they moved is because their good owner, Carroll Rosenbloom, died by drowning, and was replaced by their bad owner, his widow. It never made much sense to move out of a West Coast city that had a pretty good football tradition (Rams led the league in attendance in the '60s and '70s, and USC and UCLA had popular college football programs) to a midwestern city with less than a fifth of LA's population. St. Louis took advantage of its opportunity, eventually, but I think the writing was always on the wall for the St. Louis Rams.
I moved to St Louis in 94, and left in 97. I was a huge Rams fan, and remained a fan until they left. What I never understood, the stadium was LESS than 20 years old when the team bolted. Why, what was wrong with the stadium, or was it all Stan Donkey being a jackass just wanting more money?
The stadium wasn't very great even being as new as it was, but that was about 25% of the REAL reason they left, the other 75% is Kroenke being the devil incarnate
@@duckman6422 So, Kroenke was Georgia Frontiere?
@@saryphx the rams have a long line of demon spawns running the business
The Dome isn't nearly as bad a stadium as some say, but it was clearly built on the cheap and rushed so that St Louis could get a team back ASAP. If they took their time and built a stadium with a little more personality, like Busch Stadium, it would have lasted longer. I went to a few BattleHawks games this past year, and the Dome was a perfectly average venue, not bad, not great.
@@saryphx not exactly
"Chicago Cardinals." Ugh. That just sounds so wrong to even say, even if it is a football team.
Love the Blues song in the beginning and ending! My fave hockey team!!!! I even play as them on NHL 95 on SNES! LOL
A little context to the Cardinals moving to Phoenix: the Eagles were expected to move there in 1985. It was pretty much a done deal. But owner Leonard Tose sold the team under the agreement that they stayed in Philly.
Fantastic video, I was shocked you only have 700 subscribers. Excited to watch more of your content.
Thank you for saying REDSKINS. It's what the team was known as prior to 2020.
Real nfl fans will always call them that
@@thesuperostrich So do I. I HATE the Commanders name!
That's not to say I'm a fan of "Redskins", but it's just what I've always known them as (and will continue to know them as)
At least you have the Battlehawks now. They have been really entertaining
Glad this video came my way great stuff and yeah crazy that between the cardinals and rams there was only like 8 successful seasons in St Louis. Also weird that I wish the rams never switched uniforms but also thought the navy gold and white was a better look. I also always move Washington to STL in madden
As a Rams fan from the time I was young (1960's, 1970's), I am biased about the lighter, royal blue like uniforms from my childhood. Believe me, I understand the hurt of the Rams moving. 1994 and 1995 were not a good time for me. By the time the Rams came home, I was a Patriots and Packers fan and didn't care a lot about it.
That really is about it. The Rams were the best and worst of times for NFL football in St. Louis. I would say 4 very good seasons from the Rams, 3 years of Don Coryell Big Red teams in the 1970s, and 2 or 3 teams in the 1960s the best. The Big Red mainly mediocre.and there was not a playoff for most of the 1960s unless there was a tie for first place so never a playoff win. The 1964 playoff win he mentions of the Cardinals over Green Bay was actually only a short lived playoff games of runner-ups Green Bay in the West and St. Louis in the East with no advavcement. I followed it all and as seen by the Battle Hawks attendance wish St. Louis would get an expansion team but like he says owners committed to the region for private invesment like just happened for the new soccer stadium and team is key. It did make sense Stan Kroenke would want the much larger TV market of L.A.. . It is obvious seeing what has been happening for the Dodgers.
The St. Louis team name actually made sense and it perfectly fine.
Actually, the first St. Louis NFL team was when the Cincinnati Reds season got suspended. The St. Louis Gunners were brought up to NFL status after that for just one season in 1934 and then just moved to another league.
The St. Louis All Stars of 1923 are the first NFL team from St Louis, finishing 1-4-2 and eventually folding due to financial losses.
Great content bro. We gotta get you more subscribers. 👏🏿💯
Spot on. I’ve lived in Saint Louis my entire life and cards and blues are beloved because they are basically part of the city. Even the new soccer team is selling out. The rams seemed soulless by the end and they never became a part of the city. No relocation is ever going to work in St. Louis.
You didn’t mention the first major league team (AFL/NFL). From 1931-1940, the Saint Louis Gunners played in Saint Louis. They were in both the NFL and AFL during their years in Saint Louis. When they were purchased in 1940, they were moved and merged with the Cleveland Rams, with the former Gunners players now playing as a part of the Rams. When Georgia brought the Rams Saint Louis, it was not only a homecoming for her, but also a sort of homecoming for the Rams as well.
Charlie Trippi lived to 100, fortunately, as Chicago Cardinals did not deliver 1947 Championship Rings to the Players until 1997.
Rams played the Vikings in the 1974 and 1976 NFC Championship games and against the Cowboys in the 1975 and 1978 NFC Championship games
As the Los Angeles Rams not St Louis
We are bigger than more than half the cities in the NFL and can never get a team…it’s bullshit…
-San Antonio
You can thank Jerry Jones for that. Once he's gone San Antonio might have a chance at a team
I was born in Phoenix and moved to St. Charles fall of 1988.
People should have had their PSL refunded when the Rams left
Unfortunately I haven't had much time to follow your content, that said, great video, keep it up :)
Eagles and Cards used to have such hard fought games against each others back in the day.
The Rams were in LA since the '50's and the Owner Carrol Rosenbloom died mysteriously, in 5ft of water; his side piece a Las Vegas Showgirl (Georgia Frontiere) took control of the Team and moved them to her Hometown of St Louis after running the Franchise into the ground in Anaheim. Allegedly, she received over $200M under the table.
A wife cant be a "side piece". You sound mad. Go get some help.
Rams moved to L.A. in 1946
@@ChillydontCap She actually WAS his sidepiece after he divorced his wife, who he was cheating on for YEARS with Georgia!
BTW, the only reason she even inherited the Rams after Carroll's "accident" was because of a widows tax break law in California. Then she fired her son-in-law Steve (who SHOULD HAVE inherited the team, since he was already kind of running the team at the time) because he didn't get along with then-Rams general manager Don Klosterman (who himself would be fired a few years later after being thrown under the bus by Georgia during a breach of contract lawsuit by Fred Bryer in 1981).
My parent weren’t big on football while I was growing up but even they loved Kurt Warner. So much so that in later years when Warner took the AZ Cardinals to the Super Bowl, we all were routing for them.
I’ve got a coworker who normally lives downstate and said the Edward Jones Dome was terrible. He was sitting high up behind one of the endzones and was shocked by how obstructed his view was.
As a Los Angeles Rams fan I get your anger. I know it’s hard not only watching them win a Super Bowl at their home stadium, but be rewarded with large concerts and major international sporting events. I do like SoFi though. If I do ever visit St. Louis and wear Rams gear will there be issues? (it has the LA horn logo).
Los Angeles likes the Raiders even with the Chargers and Rams being in the city. They would still rather go to Las Vegas and watch the Raiders.
@@boogitybear2283 yeah my neighbor is an Allegiant Stadium season ticket holder so I know when he’s gone. Plus I guess this can be attributed to the Raiders staying in California until 2020 and Al Davis wanting a unified brand rather than being in one location.
@@boogitybear2283 Had the owners actually listened to their LA committee, the Rams don't leave St. Louis and that Vegas stadium (which just finished hosting a Super Bowl) would have instead been built in Carson, hosting the Raiders and Chargers.
They would probably be as upset as if I wore my Los Angeles Dodgers white home jersey in San Francisco. You might have to hire a bodyguard.
I’d think you’d be fine brother. When the rams were in the Super Bowl a few years ago I saw people out wearing their rams gear. I didn’t say anything but thought it was dumb
THat Ricky Proehl catch was the most awesome thing that I had seen up to that point!! I was born in STL and I felt proud to be from there for the first time in a long time! LMAO
Proehl was a fine little receiver when he played for Arizona,too. He just,kinda,flew under everybody’s radar.
And do people remember the 2014 Rams players protest that when football in St Louis were over
I remember what St. Louis couldn't get its act together during the last NFL expansion. The NFL was so desperate to have a team in St. Louis that they gave the city an extra month to shore up its bid package. St. Louis failed to do so, so the NFL reluctantly gave the franchise to Jacksonville. All the while, Baltimore had by far the best expansion package and greatly exceeded every NFL challenge. Kinda funny how things turned out, isn't it?
As I mentioned previously, Enos Stanley Kroenke played a very big role in Jacksonville getting the expansion team. Baltimore would eventually get an "expansion" team as the result of a stunt similar to Stan's pulled by a guy named Art Modell.
One of the best informative videos I've ever seen
Why is it a city’s and/or state’s responsibility to build these billion dollar corporations the buildings they do business in? And no one say anything about revenue or jobs these corporations create, because that is just plain wrong.
No way in hell should one tax dollar ever be given to any corporation, but especially ones that are part of the richest union of corporations in the country. (That’s what a sports league is)
Especially since every major sports union of corporations has banned community ownership such as the most successful organization has. (The Packers have won the most nfl championships)
But all this video was was a history of the cardinals and the rams. Where was the betrayal? That they moved after moving from other cities?
But I am glad to hear you hate the Rams- same reason I am no longer a raider fan. The davises have been more interested in moving than winning.
Nice video- always wondered what the deal with St Louis and the NFL was. Y’all really showed up for the Battlehawks, so there’s clearly an appetite for football.
My only criticism is sound quality is kinda all over the place- I’m sure as you do more videos like this, you’ll work out the kinks.
The mic is somewhat new. I'll make sure to work it
To piggyback off this comment, STL is a great sports city. The Cardinals and the Blues always draw huge crowds. And the Battle hawks to very very well for being in the XFL.
The narrative that we are a baseball city is a so dumb. The Rams were consistently one of the worst teams in football after the GSOT era. No fan base is going to show up for a team that can barely win 5 games a year.
@@loganhart3402 No winning seasons in their last 12 in STL, a stretch that includes the worst 5 years in NFL history (15-65).
Look at Oakland. The Raiders were there, moved, moved back and now Vegas.
I haven't watched a nfl game since the Rams left 8 years ago. I refuse to watch a nfl game unless a team calls St Louis home and the stupid chiefs don't represent St Louis. The Battlehawks are my team and the entire nfl can suck it
Well made video. I had some issues with your microphone especially since I had headphones on and I could hear your lips move sometimes before you speak, but this was overall a solid video. I also found it hilarious how the only pic you used of the old LA Rams owner has someone with a Saints sweater nearby him. lol
>had the cardinals for way longer
>cardinals not successful
>cardinals leave
>cardinals continue to suck
*no anger towards them*
>get the rams
>rams win SB
>rams leave
>rams win another SB
*seething with hate for the rams*
yes.
Bill Bidwell was very well hated. Don’t worry about that.
The Rams were never St. Louis’s team should have never left LA to begin with, they could have had another stadium built
Nobody in St. Louis really cared about the sRAMS only in 99 to 01 better than any team the LA rams put together
@@MrCoatsbullshit
if Shad Khan bought the team, i bet you he would have kept them in St. Louis.
Shahid
St. Louis, not Jacksonville, should have gotten the NFL expansion team in 1995. I still say the Jacksonville Jaguars should relocate to St. Louis and still remain in the AFC South with nearby cities Nashville and Indianapolis. Even the dome is still better than Jacksonville’s stadium. The Gator Bowl is a dump!
If you ever get a chance to hear Howard Balzer talk on the subject, who does he say was largely responsible for the Jaguars winding up in Jacksonville? Señor Stan himself, as he refused to work with the group pursuing the expansion team. But also to the point of the video: St. Louis needs an expansion team of their own. No more relocations.
Read this closely. That’s not happening. It won’t ever happen. Also, there is no “Gator Bowl”, there’s Everbank Field, and it’s getting a two billion dollar renovation, so it will look much like, ironically, SoFi. The Jags and the city are working together to ensure the Jaguars remain in Jacksonville for a long time.
I agree, St. Louis is a much better football town. Jacksonville is a dump.
“Better” football towns don’t lose two NFL teams. Jax continuously outdrew the Rams when they were in St Louis. Get the fantasy of the Jaguars moving out of your head. It’ll never happen.
The attendance only fell after the Rams sucked for a long time, 2007-15. If the Rams were still in St. Louis with the current coaching regime and winning seasons and superbowl trophy attendance would be back to greatest show on turf era.
Kroenke did to St Louis what Frontiere did to us in So Cal. What goes around comes around.
I agree with you 💯%
THAT is why St. Louis doesn't get much sympathy from me. People like to say that the Rams left LA because of poor fan support, but forget that Georgia's actions in the late 80's and early 90's were one of the MAIN reasons for it! There are the conspiracies that Georgia intentionally destroyed the team after the 1989 season (which they made it to the NFC Championship) to create the environment to force the NFL to let her leave. That's not so much a conspiracy since it was TRUE.
Look, what Kroenke did to St. Louis was shitty, I'll accept that. But I'd argue what Georgia did to SoCal was way worse in just HOW she literally forced the Rams out of LA.
I’m sure every local could not pick pronunciation but we say it like de-kate-ur and they were actually the Stayles Bears.🐻
I was a foreigner growing up loving the greatest show on turf of the St. Louis Rams. It was my dream to go see the game for real one day. I'd finally made it in 2015. Unfortunately, It was the last year that the team I had known and loved was the team I grew up with.
Deep down, I still wished that Kroenke didn't exercise his right and sold his share to Shad Khan. He's a greedy business mogul who only cares about money and hometown royalty doesn't matter to him at all.
St. Louis has been treated horribly by the NFL. I could use stronger words but I would get banned.
I grew up idolizing the St. Louis football Cardinals in the 1970s; probably the greatest team to not win a playoff game in that time period. After the Cardinals moved to Arizona and the Rams to St. Louis there was a rumor the Cards were considering moving again, this time to L.A. That never happened but if so the teams could have switched logos and been back where they were lol.
I thought of another example -- DC technically lost both the Twins and Rangers, although both franchises were called the "Senators" when they played in Washington, but they were two different franchises.
I think you would enjoy the 2009 Cardinals Football book by St. Louis sports historian Greg Marecek. I am old enough that I started following the Big Red their first season in STL in 1960. Their 1964 playoff win over Green Bay was actually only a game of the runner-ups Green Bay in the West and St. Louis in the East with no advancement. This is why it is said the Big Red in St. Louis never won a playoff game. According to Greg Marecek he blamed the separate St. Louis City and County governments for not agreeing on a new football stadium location, since Bill Bidwell initially wanted to stay in STL. Bill Bidwell thought Phoenix would right away help build a new stadium but it took 18 years so they played at Arizona State all those years. The Rams are a different story. As a result of the St. Louis lawsuit it was indirectly learned approval to move was only given when Stan Kroenke signed an indemnification agreement to compensate NFL owners in the event of any St. Louis lawsuits. This overrode the NFL Relocation committee recommending to keep the Rams in St. Louis and an initial relocation vote. No way though would it have been good for Stan Kroenke to stay in St. Louis. He had already bought land for SOFI years prior and wanted the large TV market of L.A. as did Roger Goodell and a few owners such as Jerry Jones of Dallas and Hunt of Kansas City per the initial relocation vote. Much came out in a long St. Louis Post Dispatch article of what had been learned during the lawsuit a few months after settlement. St. Louis was ready to build a new stadium but needed an owner to contribute. I think an owner would have been found but an owner similar to the private investors of the new soccer team to build a new stadium committed to the STL region is key. I enjoyed your video and agree with your conclusion at the end. Also a better resolution of the Rams moving should have been awarding St. Louis an expansion team.
I remember reading the Post Dispatch headline "Cardinals can stay, Bidwell must go"
Thank you for this video. I have a special connection to the Lou. Was also my first NFL game I attended. Was a huge fan and the origin story of my hatred for TB12 & the Pats. Eventually, I became a Seahawks fan but still had a special place in my heart for the Rams until they moved to LA. I've hated them ever since and hope every pass gets a pick6, every run gets fumbled out of the endzone, every kick sails wide right, and Nacua becomes a Seahawks while he's a sensation. Amen. Good stuff!
I must have buried the trauma of being a rams fan through the 2010’s. I started trying to remember players from that era and my brain went “Janoris Jenkins, Kenny Stills- okay that’s enough of that”. I also instinctively shudder when I see the camera pan across the chiefs sideline and Steve Spagnuolo pops out of nowhere
I've never even been to St. Louis but hasn't it always been said that any football team that is there will always play second fiddle to the Baseball Cardinals?
Since the Cardinals suck...who knows
They probably would, but that doesn't mean the fanbase would be nonexistent. So long as the team isn't as awful as the Rams were that last decade in STL the fans will show up.
Anyone else think its quite a strange coincidence that once the Rams moved, the Chiefs became a dynasty, and the Rams made it back to the Superbowl?
Chiefs wanted the rams to move. They’re were only a few teams that voted against the rams moving
I think it was the eagles, packers, cardinals, and chargers
No
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Never again, NFL. Stay the hell out of St. Louis. (And Missouri too, for that matter - hopefully the Chiefs move across the border to Kansas.)
Fool me thrice, then what?
I don't if it is mentioned but st louis had 4 nfl teams St. Louis has been the home of four National Football League (NFL) franchises. Three years after the NFL was founded in 1920, it accepted the St. Louis All-Stars as a franchise for the 1923 NFL season. Then 14-7.
The second franchise was the St. Louis Gunners. The Gunners were an independent professional football team that played the last three games of the 1934 National Football League season, replacing the Cincinnati Reds on the league schedule after the Reds' league membership was suspended.
Oakland are another city that should be pissed off. Betrayed by 2 major sports teams and a 3rd on the way
-Claveland lost 2 NFL teams
-LA lost 3 NFL teams
-New York has 2 NFL teams that are not even in the state of New York.
St. Louis lost 4 NFL teams
@@JoeErhart no just 2
@@gandhi3625 All-Stars, Gunners, Cardinals, and Rams
@JoeErhart independent teams are not NFL. By that logic, every mayor city has lost multiple teams, and those cities I mentioned add another half dozen list teams
@@gandhi3625 All-Stars weren't independent, Gunners played part of a season in the NFL
I was a huge Rams fan, and Isaac Bruce will always be my favorite player. What hurts the most was the way that owner trashed the city to get out.
What will never make sense is that the Cardinals left because they wanted a new stadium and proceeded to play in a college stadium for 2 decades. Additionally, our hometown wouldn’t build the Cardinals a new stadium, but proceeded to build one with no official tenant just a handful of years later.
Life is better as a Chiefs fan
The NFL, for some reason, hates our city. They did not want the Rams to be here in the first place. Even when the Dome was new it was made clear there would be no Suler Bowls played in STL (too far North...unlike Detroit I guess). We followed the NFL own rules to keep the team with an actionable stadium ready to be built and the Rams moved before San Diego or Oakland! I no longer watch the NFL. Why watch a league that publicly badmouthed where I live and had two teams move away? Give me college football. The teams may conference realign, but the teams don't leave their fans.
i am from europe and have no idea of football. but why cant you relocate the city of st. louis near to a nfl city
Fans will support an NFL Team Born and Breaded in St. Louis
I give my regards to the St. Louis All-Stars (1923-1923) and the St. Louis Gunners (1931-1940) The First & Second NFL Teams in St. Louis, Before The Cardinals, and the Rams.
I'm from st Louis and I wish we had a nfl team
The Rams were also in the NFC Championship vs. the Bears in '86 (after the '85 season).
cool to learn some of the history of the city. thanks!
I think the biggest betrayal was from the cardinals, Rams were in LA since 1946 so they belonged in LA but Georgia Frontiere was from St Louis and wanted them there, which her husband rosenbloom would NOT have done, that is why LA does not name the name of Georgia Frontiere.
Who really should hate is the Cardinals they were the original STL football team
The Original NFL team was the St. Louis All-Stars, followed by by the Gunners
St. Louis had 4 NFL teams. The All-Stars, Gunners, Cardinals, and Rams. Couldn't keep any of them
Yeah but that’s not our fault it’s the NFL’s fault.
For being fucking corrupted, greedy, and rigged also.
We did our best to keep the Rams and I’m not even capping when I say that. And with the Cardinals too but I wasn’t born yet whenever they were playing in my hometown Saint Louis.
2 of those teams were from the era when teams folded/relocated left and right, so not really a relevant comparison.
The Cardinals relocation I will admit was mostly on St Louis. Bill Bidwill was a crappy owner, but the city and county couldn't make up their minds on a new stadium so the Cardinals left.
The Rams situation was the opposite. St Louis was fully prepared to build and fund a stadium, but Stan Kroenke negotiated in bad faith and broke NFL relocation policies to move to LA. (The NFL's media HQ just so happens to be on the SoFi Stadium campus... makes you think). Kroenke and the Rams had to pay STL nearly 800M for the move, and rightfully so.
What really sucked is when Jacksonville and Carolina got there expansion teams,St. Louis was a finalist that year,with a team set to be called the Stalions. If this wouldve happened it wouldve been a lot better than getting the rams,but we will always have a superbowl victory I guess
That Super Bowl team belonged to St. Louis. I believe there was only one player on the 'Greatest Show On Turf' that was in his rookie year when the Rams moved to St. Louis, and when the franchise moved back to LA, all them Super Bowl players were long gone. Instead of calling that team the St. Louis Rams, I'd prefer to call them the name they earned, 'The Greatest Show On Turf'
@@TS-wh4ey so are you from st.louis or LA,or just a ram fan in general
@TS-wh4ey and I think you're right. There might have been two players that came from LA that were on the superbowl team,Isaac Bruce for sure and maybe Demarco Far
@@cardsfan1590
Yeah I knew the one was Bruce, not sure about Demarco.
@@cardsfan1590
I grew up in St. Louis county and recently moved from Jefferson County to the Ozarks. But I was a Big Red fan and of course the 'Greatest Show On Turf' SB victory was one of the most exciting championship moments in St.Louis history. I'll never forget that year Warner and Faulk led the team to that Super Bowl win. The catch by Bruce and the Mike Jones tackle, will forever be one of the greatest moments in St. Louis sports history. Yeah cherish the memory, but it's time to move on and support the Battlehawks and the new league now. They are a homegrown team and that league will continue to grow. I'm past done with the NFL.
I love my Rams I've been a fan since 1993 and still a Rams fan Haters gonna Hate I've would of Subscribed but till the end of watching u say u hate my team I won't. HAVE A GREAT DAY & STAY OFF THEM DRUGS MY GUY
I have a soft for the football cardinals, love the logo, the angry birds
The Rams weren't a long time OG St Louis team to begin with. They were from Cleveland in the 1920s before they moved to LA in the 50s and were there for 40 years. The Cardinals, though I can understand. Never made sense to me why they decided to leave in the first place
Because Bidwell was a bastard.
Destroyed Ozark Airlines as well.
Rams started in Cleveland in the 30's, left for L.A. in the 40's
8:42 so if that trade hadn’t happened Baltimore might still have the colts……. As a Baltimore native and ravens fan idk how to feel about this one
St. Louis should have gotten an expansion team over Jacksonville
Final Fantasy 6 music underneath?
Close. FF7
@@PenguinNote67 ah my mind filed that away wrongly thank you