Ubisoft Star Wars Outlaws trailer mass disliked due to pricey editions, online requirement, & more
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 เม.ย. 2024
- PATREON: / yongyea
TWITTER: / yongyea
INSTAGRAM: / yong_yea
TIKTOK: / yongyea
SOURCES
1: • Star Wars Outlaws: Off...
2: www.ign.com/articles/star-war...
3: store.ubisoft.com/us/star-war...
4: www.pcgamer.com/games/action/...
5: / 1777782609105277181
6: www.reddit.com/r/saltierthank...
7: www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comme...
8: www.ubisoft.com/en-us/company...
9: kotaku.com/ubisofts-next-gen-...
10: • The largest campaign e...
11: www.stopkillinggames.com/
12: kotaku.com/ubisoft-the-crew-a...
13: www.gamesindustry.biz/the-new...
TOP PATRONS
[BIG BOSS]
- Devon B
- gergely oggolder
- Jonathan Ball
[BOSS]
- Charlie Galvin
- Gerardo Andrade
- Marketing aag
- Michael Redmond
[LEGENDARY]
- azalea
- dirt - เกม
I hope the game turns out cool as as the trailers make it look, but from the overpriced editions that lock content and "early access" to the online requirement to play the physical edition to the Stop Killing Games movement Ubisoft is embroiled in, it's not hard to imagine why optics are so negative right now.
PATREON: www.patreon.com/yongyea
TWITTER: twitter.com/yongyea
INSTAGRAM: instagram.com/yong_yea
TIKTOK: www.tiktok.com/@yongyea
TOP PATRONS
[BIG BOSS]
- Devon B
- gergely oggolder
- Jonathan Ball
[BOSS]
- Charlie Galvin
- Gerardo Andrade
- Marketing aag
- Michael Redmond
[LEGENDARY]
- azalea
- dirt
.
.
..
.
.
Never pre order a Ubisoft game. NEVER.
I'll do you one better. Don't pre-order ANY game.
I'll do you one better, don't buy Ubisoft games, pirate them at most
*buy
(In most cases)
Never pre order anything
Well I got Ubisoft plus so I can say I play mirage and avatar frontiers of pandora and prince of Persia remake
Ubisoft: "Be comfortable not owning your games."
Me: Fine. Be comfortable not owning my money.
Remember: If paying isn't owning, piracy isn't theft.
The guy was answering the question: "What is necessary for game subscription services to take off?" Obviously a gamer needs to be comfortable with not owning games to use such a service.
Well said dude!
@@VitalVampyr found Ubisoft CEO's throw away account
I wonder what happens if everyone that bought the suddenly does a charge back on it because they didn't get the game they paid for.
I wish that events like E3 still existed so that gamers could publicly boo these executives.
maybe why e3 has ceased to exist 😆
Exactly 👍🏼
Like that's going to do any good.
Do you guys not own phones 😂😂😂😂
@@YuniorGamboa It certainly makes for good video clips. There's nothing like watching these self-satisfied jokers eat sh1t onstage.
Also, as a Canadian, there's a cruel irony to a Ubisoft game costing so much here; they're one of our countries biggest studios and get millions in tax relief and government grants, support programs etc. but we still pay way more to buy their products
Of course, Ubisoft found that government funding is an untapped potential, merely to exploit (as was the case with Skull and Bones.) That's all they do, provide a product purely to exploit as many people as possible. They've unfortunately done it for the last decade, and its only getting worse.
Huh one would expect them to facilitate somehow in their own damn country. I remember during the times of Far Cry 3 here in Brazil Ubisoft had a policy of making their prices lower for new games, it was great and actually worked for a few years. Back when they still used to make fun games.
Video games are almost always [relatively] cheaper in the United States than anywhere else.
Even games developed here in the UK will cost say £60 here and $60 in America - which saves Americans $15 more than their UK counterparts.
Same case for Skull & Bones in Singapore.They had government grants and huge subsidies to support local video game developers in the Singapore office and yet the project was terribly mismanaged to churn out a half baked product which they called "quadruple A" game. I'm legitimately surprised how they are still not held legally accountable at this point.
Just wait a month and it will be on sale for half it original price, that’s how Ubisoft works
Ubisoft: "players have to get comfortable with not owning games"
Players: "Ubisoft has to get comfortable with people not buying or subscribing to their games."
Told myself exactly the same thing when I heard that quote from that clown executive.
@@Rochardzorz fact like the fact this suppose to be single play game and you had to be online to play it and worst this game had a subscription to, Ubisoft know what they doing and being greedy as hell, and only few loyal Ubisoft going eat this up
Got Ubi to delete my account and all associated games about 3 yrs ago. Greedy peddlers of half made crap lol
A wise man once said:
If purchase is not ownership
Then piracy isnt theft
A majority of games bought are digital. Most people don’t care about owning games. So I doubt there will ever be a change to this
-70 to 130 dollars
-Online connection is a must to play
-Microtransactions (cosmetics, DLCs)
-A recent statement: "We Want People To Get Used To Not Owning What They’ve Bought"
Ubisoft? More like Ubiclowns
I was able to buy it for $58 from Green Man Gaming with my gold account and a voucher. I'll buy dlc after it's all released and only if it's worth it. Aint no way I'm paying ubi anything over $60!
@@MaxRamos8You are the problem, have fun losing your game in 5 years.
Ubisucks as usual
In the 30+ years I've been gaming I have never ever bought a game that requires me to be online to play it and I have no intention of starting to. For me it's physical copies all the way baby.
Ubishit...
What makes me mad, is that people will buy the expensive ones.
What makes me mad, is this is an endless circle.
And no one will learn their lesson.
Since when did people learn their lesson. Average people are s tupid and will just consume everything they can get. Take a look at the upcoming Stellar Blade game. 99% of people don't even know that buying the game will support a gacha dev. yes you heard that right the devs make millions of profit from their other gacha games.
humans will human
@@roahnosh stellar blade has gacha elements? or the developer had made gacha games?
Yeah I've seen tons of people reply "already ordered the ultimate edition" in reply to people warning about pre-orders.
It's hopeless. 130 bucks, season pass, missable content if you don't pay up the huge price, exclusive early access, mtx, uglified scanned 3d model for wokeness, racist community manager, always online and when servers go away you lose it all.. and people STILL pre-order and vote thumbs up to it all.
No wonder AAA-gaming is in the gutter.
@@roahnosh I personally don't care what the devs other projects are. Nikke is a gacha, yes and that's why I don't play it and even when I did I didn't put money into it. Stellar Blade won't have that, so I'll gladly support it for daring to be just a fun game without being worried of offending or not going with the times (that is, if the reviews are good and there will be no surprises)
Nice shout-out to Ross Scott (the guy behind Accursed Farms). He's been researching this kind of corporate stupidity for years and he could certainly use the attention and help to get things going.
"Paying for content ingame are time savers". Not buying the game is a time and money saver.
I never understood this premise. They do know when we play games that it's a part of our day we've set aside for entertainment. If the game was actually good then there would be no need for time savers, they should want us to enjoy each moment of their game not skip past it.
@@happyjam92It's called idiot tax and it most likely banks because whales are a thing. They don't care how fun a game may be, they just wanna have everything instantly.
@@happyjam92 Why make the game good when you can pay to skip it!
Wait, people are not buying our games, SINGLEPLAYER IS DEAD.
It's so crazy that the idea is to have entertainment that we paid for, yet should want to skip by paying even more. What kind of fucked up entertainment is that?
but dragons dogma doing it is okay great job consoomers
The online requirement bullshit NEEDS TO STOP. Like actually it needs to STOP. Especially if it’s going to be a single player title. Games like Skyrim, fall out 3/4 you know are games still going to this day single player titles. Guess what you DONT need to play them? A ONLINE CONNECTION.. it SERIOUSLY needs to STOP.
My Steam Deck and I have words for this kind of bullshit.
You see, there's NEEDS to have 24/7 online BS on all games now because AAA companies believe in delivering a piece of shit, bare bone game at release day, THEM pray to the Church or Day One Patch to work on what should've been on release.
I agree
literally its such bullshit, ive just stopped buying games and I hope over time more and more stop as well
You know how to stop it?
You know how to stop it.
If paying doesn't mean owning, pirating doesn't mean stealing
how can anyone be excited for a game without any gameplay? its literally all cut scenes.
Hype is a thing, and the masses are, as always, fairly ignorant.
Star Wars fans will hype anything Star Wars related.
We had gameplay footage last year it. Was 13 min long
@@NotAGovernmentAgent and hate its existence right after.
gameplay was revealed first lol
Wait this is a SINGLE PLAYER game and it requires a connection to play, i'm getting absolutely sick of BS, modern gaming just finds ways to constantly get worse "We're focusing on Live Service now" "DRM is going to ruin your game" "A game is going to require an internet connection to play it" (Sigh)
There's a season pass too
Yes, and this is not too long after The Crew (another Ubisoft game) was made completely unplayable after its servers were shutdown. It’s wild.
There are a lot of good modern gaming companies out there, but ubisoft will always scrape the bottom of the barrel
To install, not to play. Still, fuck this
@@noodlez7101Literally 2 Weeks ago. I was playing it when it shut down IN THE MIDDLE OF ONE OF THE FINAL MISSIONS
the best way to experience an ubisoft game is:
A - pirate it;
B - wait a year to get it for 10$.
C: DONT, play a game from a better company instead.
@@nathank2289 This is the only reply, should be reply A. Should be all the replies, triple A (or more!)
ROFL!!!!!!!!! Keepin it 100
Piracy excused.
And Ubisoft and other companys wounder why people pirate their stuff, its a proper skinners moment.
“Looks neat” costs $130 to play an artificially locked mission and season pass, and the top edition is just absolute madness. Heard an interesting take that they’re putting prices so high to push people towards Ubisoft+ to play the best edition that way and sucker people into yet another service.
CEOs need to get comfortable with us not buying their slop
Well in this instance you could pay $18 for a month's sub to Ubisoft+, play the Ultimate Edition that costs $130 on their cloud gaming service and then immediately cancel the sub in the same month...you don't own the game, but you've probably had $18 worth out of it...and Ubisoft don't get the $130 sale. Not sure they've thought this through particularly well. You would have to be insane to pay full price for it when you can play it forget about it for less than 1/6th of the price.
@@vallejomach6721 Yeah... I could also just play something good instead.
@@roflBeckthat's the funny take: why waste precious time on a game you know will be bad? Just play an actual good game.
@@vallejomach6721 That's still not worth it, you'll also be inundated with countless spam emails from Ubisoft to rejoin their garbage service. No thanks.
CEOs need to get comfortable being jumped in a parking lot at 1am and barely walking away with their lives
It’s Ubisoft. You’re obligated to dislike it
The new prince of persia is really good. Even on the switch it runs buttery smooth.
Agreed 👍
I’m doing my part!
At this point, it is mandated
Haters will never achieve anything.
That “online requirement” crap is insane. These people are beyond greed.
Ubisoft Has to get comfortable with us, not spending money on their games.
It's a shame that this is the state of the gaming industry. A Star Wars game like this 10-15 years ago would be met with mass praise and hype but corporate greed has ruined everything...
And the Message.
An online requirement is a bigger deal breaker for me than the price, to be honest.
EDIT: Adding this since some people are getting triggered. My reasoning for it being a bigger deal breaker is because it doesn't matter if the game is $1 or $100: the online requirement will still be there.
Yeah that’s kinda bs not being able to play it without it
Stop paying 100$ for a shit game
So, if they remove the online requirements, you would buy the game $110?
Me too. I kinda refuse to get most AAA games now. Indie games are where it's at.
@Windupchronic
What a clown!
The price.
The always online.
BOTH suck!
Ya'll need to get this through your heads: They don't WANT this game to be played in 20 years, like Skyrim and Fallout. In 20 years they want you renting streamed games like a videogame version of Netflix. They want to be able to delete your entire game library for Wrong-Think. They want to own YOU the way you want to own your games.
If we refuse to buy any Triple A games for the next two years, we will be reminding them of one critical fact: They need us more than we need them. There's plenty of AWESOME indie games out there for you to enjoy for the next two years. And you PC gamers reading this know you have a Steam backlog that can easily keep you entertained for the next two years.
Close your wallet to ALL Triple A Studios for just TWO years and the gaming industry will come crawling and begging us to return with good, consumer-friendly practices front and center. But you have to do it for at least two years. That's the minimal development/fiscal cycle needed to force the bean counters at these Studios to take notice and implement the necessary changes.
You're dead on that they want to put a stop to people playing games beyond their shelf life in an effort to force consumers into spending money on the next thing.
Waaay ahead of you. My favorite game right now is Valheim. I have no interest in any AAA game.
i dont think you understand how the game industry works my guy
@@CameronShember Any other time I would have agreed and not bothered. But in this "Fool's Golden Era" of Triple A gaming where the studios now go out of their way to spit in the faces of thier customers all over social media while simultaneously cranking out trash games with ugly characters and brazenly predatory payment models....they're doing the bulk of the work for us. They're making it hilariously easy to boycott them.
We've already proven we can perform a spectacular BUYcott with Hogwarts Legacy. Now it's time to really show these studios who's in charge. We'll never have a more perfect confluence of events and circumstances than we have right now.
And it ain't like we even all have to do it. If even a quarter of the people reading this do it, the Studios are gonna FEEL it. If every four person friend group has at least one person doing it, that will get the job done.
No more excuses guys. We do this or it simply gets done for us a few more years down the road when the industry as a whole caves in on itself.
Controlled burn to get rid of the dead weight within two years, or complete industry-wide implosion within ten years. Those are our options now.
@@CameronShember I said Buycott. Not boycott. Hogwarts was a spectacular BUYcott. Boycotts are harder to do and maintain than Buycotts are, I agree...but again, the Triple A studios themselves are going out of their way to make it easier than it has ever been. And easier than it will ever be short of total industry-wide implosion.
If we still can't do it with all these factors in our favor, then we deserve to watch the industry fail.
Honest business is like a tree. You nurture it, you protect it, it outlives you. You pass it on to whomever can grow it bigger and better.
Shady business is like a moss. You spread it, you rake in the green, and you choke plants with it. There's no cycle, just a CEO grindset.
You keep buying $70, instead of $60, Now they ask for $110. You give them an inch, they'll take a mile.
Facts
Ubisoft+ goes brrr!
Not trying to say Ubisoft's the good guy or anything, but it's only 70 bucks for the game itself. That's one of the extra editions' prices.
@LloydTheZephyrian and helldivers 2 is $40. Season pass in that game can also be bought with in-game currency.
Ubisoft is retarded and I won't be buying any trash from them.
yeah, but gamers are waking up to this shit finally, and fighting back at all, microtransactions need to fuck off fr
This is why I love Baldur's Gate 3. $60 for the complete product with no microtransactions, no season passes, no online only drm. Just a pure fun game.
...and also the most patched game ever.
60 dollars for an alpha version game.
You are a clown dude.
And you don't need a $5000 rig to play it. Bg3 looks great and even old cards can run it.
Yeah dude, Fromsoftware too.
So rare these days.
@@vane909090 Exactly! My 11-year-old PC is running BG3 at high settings. 🤣🤣
@@vane909090 yup, my steam deck runs it pretty well
Oh ubisoft, continue to give me reasons to avoid everything you touch like its the plague
You forgot to add Sweet Baby Inc to the title.
Yongame335 I didn't like my own comment but now I did just to spite you. Cry more you sweet baby simp.
Yongame335 he has 10 you have 1, who likes their own comment? I mean if we're just making assumptions now...
@Yongame335 Says it's 'not a bot'. But reposts these exact 2 comments to my videos. Account 2 days old. Bot confirmed. x'D
(funny automated response, nobody even called it a bot)
Its funny how all these companies that put out these "play the game 3 days early" editions and literally 50% of the time the game effectively doesnt work until the "real" launch day or sometimes later as well.
games dont work until years later period.
Starfailed is a good example. It got me. Bethesda has burned me twice. They're now blacklisted, never buying another game from them.
It is funny yet people still buy it or want to play early and never learn 😩
@@georgejones5019 me too man. I didnt bought starfield tho but honestly launching it without nvidia support was ludicrous
My sentiments exactly. I don't preorder games at all partially due to this reason, but I'm sure as fuck not pre ordering for the "early access" bonus. I would wager that at least 75% of all games that come out now are completely unplayable for like a week after launch, its ridiculous.
Brother. You need to reorganize that corner, it's looking like a hoarders den in that room.
It really does... He needs some nice shelves to display his hoarder pile. Gives me Asmon vibes.
He just needs to organize his collection
I’ve thought this so many times but never said it! 😅 Got some nice figs there, but it looks like ass.
The facial animations are haunting. That’s my issue rn. That and the main character looks like Dora the explorer with her hair and animal on her shoulder. She’s just missing a backpack.
It's like they took Han Solo and grafted on the head of that Scottish woman from the Critical Drinker meme who says "Smells like shite".
Knowing ubisoft, i wouldn't be surprised if the Millenium Falcon has a stamina bar or a mechanic that it gets tired.
If you run out of stamina you have to stop and do some minigames to fix the engine
But for a "small" fee, you can buy a time saver to get rid of it!
Oh you wish it was the Millennium Falcon.
The ship in this game is a box.
It actually looks like someone grabbed the base ship from Starfield and stripped it of ANY personality it may have had.
We went from Dash Rendar's Outrider to a box.
@@Silamon2ubi aren't that kind, there's only one option and it'll be timesavers /travel Boosters for real money
The Millenium Falcon is probably paid only DLC. They probably would give you a generic ship that you need to upgrade by agonizing grind, probably called the Bicentennial Weasel or something like that.
These practices justify pirating... Give us incomplete games that require internet connection. I'll use my Internet Connection to get your game for free...
💯
PREACH MY BROTHERS🙌
I wouldn't even pirate an Ubi game.
Nothing in this world justifies crime. What is wrong with you?
@@cezarstefanseghjucan These game companies are criminals.
Way to leave out the justified backlash against the community manager who is unhinged and insulting the player base
He also carefully avoided the uglification issue in the title as well and he didn't include SBI influence
Because he is afraid to speak out against the ongoing agenda. Coward. This is exactly why it continues. CALL THIS GARBAGE OUT.
classic yong
Ya, I just gave Yong a downvote for this one. Hope he doesn't become a wokester like Bellular. Might have to unsub if that happens.
Yong is a COWARD as usual.
Even if the game interested me I still wouldn’t buy it. I bought WatchDogs Legion day 1 and didn’t learn. I bought Far Cry 6 day 1 and didn’t learn. It’s obviously taken me a while to learn this but I’m done giving Ubisoft my money.
Another thing that isn’t even mentioned here is the fact that there’s a disclaimer at the beginning of the video that says “Not all images appear in game”. This is giving me Aliens: Colonial Marines and Anthem vibes. Like, this trailer is false advertising and not representative of the final product, but it’s totally fine legally cuz it has a one-second disclaimer “warning” everyone, so it’s all of your faults if you missed it.
Why the fuck is shit even in the trailer if it’s not in the game unless it’s to trick people…?
They make the trailers before they finish the game. With regard to the initial trailers they release, those are made and put out a year to years, plural, before the game itself comes out. Same happens for movies pretty often.
The complaint that would be heard here is that studios release trailers too early in development, because that's really the only way to fix this. You definitely don't want devs locking into something just because it was a feature early in development, that would be a massive train wreck lol
I agree, in-engine trailers should be banned unless they're reveal trailers.
Having a launch trailer being in-engine is disingenuous
Sounds like cyberpunk
idk why shit like this aint illegal yet
Also Watchdogs. Not all images appear in game also means actual quality of the graphics may be seriously downgraded. See that lighting? See that reflection? See that texture? Those are all images in a video. Don't expect them to be there.
I expected Ubisoft to mess this up, but I didn't expect it to happen so quickly
Game's not even out yet and they're tripping on the umbilical cord.
Not quickly enough.
What have they messed up
As a Malaysian, with that kind of price tag $130 for ultimate bundle converted to MYR is equivalent to more than MYR500 to us here. Most expensive I've seen in video game thus far.
You don't have to pay for it
FF7 Rebirth is now the gold standard for what a triple A game should look like in my mind. If you can't hit that level of content and quality, I'm not paying full price.
Ubisoft has not learned anything from Skull and Bones.
Bold of you to assume that Ubisoft learns anything.
@utisti4976 I leaned that this will be another quality AAAA game. 👌
They only care to fill their greedy hollow soulless bodys
Good. Hopefully they'll go under and they'll no longer be a plague on the industry
They are betting on people being gullible because they are using the Star Wars name to sell their crap. And sadly it will work
Ubisoft has been caught botting praise for this game too on Twitter.
Why am I not surprised? Lol corpos are getting pathetic.
link?
Source?
@@TheFirstCurse1 I've seen this on yellow flash 2
It was Disney & Lucas film. I'm not sure if Ubisoft had anything to do with it. Not that it's any better. Ubisoft is still a shit company.
As others have said why pay a premium to play the game "early" when the game is likely to be released in a buggy, incomplete state? Nowadays it's usually best to wait a year before you buy a AAA game. It's not only cheaper, but also has had a chance for bugs to be fixed. AAA used to mean high quality both in terms of production values and in terms of QA. It used to be that AAA studios had the time and budget to do a thorough QA pass before they released a game. Now a lot of indie games and AA games are released more complete and with better visuals than many AAA games. That's one reason I am happy to see GoG and Steam covering the triple-i initiative this week highlighting indie games.
It’s possible for The Crew to be playable offline. Sony made a offline patch to make Gran Turismo Sport completely playable offline. Car costs in game were also devalued so they weren’t crazy expensive.
Ubisoft deleted my Ubisoft account and all of my games I purchased. The entire company should be shut down and everyone involved with deleting games and accounts should be thrown in jail
Oh right, I remember they do that if you don't log in periodically. I remember seeing the email.
Was even before they made that statement about not owning games.
They really want people to buy their subscription.
That is pure BS what they did. Can you find and hire a good lawyer to freaking sue those Aholes?
Lol I’d be pissed too ! It’s literal theft
@@Kim-py3ivyou can't sue them, it's in the TOS 😅
Also they'll say we sent an email prior, not our fault
@@A1stardanHey! It's worth a shot
The longer time goes on the I realize how much more I appreciated the near-unlimited replayability of games like Civilization, Skyrim, etc. that need no online requirement or endless seasons/DLC to enjoy. Of late I'm getting more fun out of primitive games like Dwarf Fortress, Path of Exile, Vampire Survivors, Rule the Waves 3, etc. than any "AAA" company is dumping out.
Don't forget mod support, something these always online crap will never get.
That and smaller indie titles made by people who wanted to make a game, not a product. I look at stuff like Brigador, Deep Rock Galactic, Art of Rally (all 3 which I could get for the base price of this game) and I'd so much rather spend my limited time playing those.
Games that release with DLC that isn't solely cheap cosmetics is a no-buy for me.
I don't mind game's deluxe edition or whatever added a unique cosmetic or the art books but once add weapons, systems, characters, and especially MISSIONS/STORY CONTENT it something I'm not willing to spend anything over 15$ for because i know if i pay that 60$, 80$, 100$+ price tag... I might as well be playing the tria version on launch.
At least once it's under 20$, by that time the majority of the content will be added and for dirt cheap.
i think is a solo player game has a must-be online part, once they close it like The Crew, they should patch it so it make it now server/close that call command and allowed a offline function so can still play it after the servers are gone.
Ubisoft - "Be comfortable not owning your games."
Me - "Be comfortable with me never purchasing a game from you."
> Game requires an Online connection to play
Are you FUCKING KIDDING ME UBISOFT
What's next? They want a sample of your blood just to order their games? Ugh!
@@Kim-py3ivNah, they'll want your house next.
Missing internet in 2024? Change your shit location.
To install, not to play
@@cezarstefanseghjucan Internet is still here and yet Ubisoft's 'The Crew' is not.
Nowhere on Earth can you get away from Ubisoft being the worst game developer in the history of videogames.
Every who owns "The Crew" should support Ross of "Accursed Farms" to help stop companies from killing games.
At 6:20 you say "does this game have...", and then an ad came on that said "Ryan Reyonlds from Mint Mobile", and I almost lost it. LOL
Just do what i do, wait for the games to be under 30buks and then buy it, by then the game is patched and ready to play.
My budget is 30buks for every game.
Some advice i have is. Play all the old games you never had the chance to play that are 80% off on steam while you wait for the new games to inevitably go on sale because large publishers are so desperate for immediate results they will drastically lower the price of a game just to boost the "copy's sold" number and make some extra profit as soon as they can.
Also buy indie games, they are much more respectful of your money.
I don't see why everyone's complaining about price of a ubisoft game, they go 80% off in 2 months anyway 😂
@@A1stardanshtupp.schill
@@A1stardanI agree Ubisoft does this for all their mainline titles.
@@A1stardan Slippy slope. Other companies will probably start doing this. Don't expect base game GTA6 to be anything less than $80.
@@devbyrd6127 A bad game should know its a bad game. To ubisoft a bad game is a good game as long as it brings profit
This is why people pirate games.
@@Desolat-e this is why piracy is justified these days*
@@Desolat-e While what you said is true, these kind of practices have been going on Far longer than you'd think.
I think what OP was implying was sh!tty business practices in general, which, yeah that's a key reason alot of people pirate things. It's not a money issue like these companies would have you beleive, it's a service issue; one often assosiated with anti-consumer practices,
People definitely don’t pirate games like they used to. These DRMs have been making it increasingly difficult not to mention the constant patching for performance issues. Piracy is almost not worth it at this point.
Why even waste your time with this, tbh
I dont pirate anything, plenty of games to pay for that are actually good.
Here in Brazil this game costs half of the monthly minimum wage.
In brasil, ultimate edition is 650 reais, Gold 550, standard 350, it isn't cheap, a lot of people here live with 1500 or less per month
Anyone else remember when the $130 Whale Edition of games included stuff like a metal case, a large physical artbook, and a nice looking statue?
If they give you a big statue this time... You may have a nightmare.
Still have my Halo 3 Legendary edition helmet in a place of honor. Those were the days.
@@johndetlie7853 Nice day in memories.
Yup
I mean, given Ubisoft's record it was to be expected. I'm glad people in the comments section for every video are suggesting not to pre-order.
ah yes because the internet comments mean something in the mass market lol
@@ausgod538 so u saying their lying makes sense.
I haven't bought a Ubisoft product. And i've been gaming since 1992.
I'll do you one better. If it has Ubisoft slapped onto it, skip it all together.
@UltimateInkling yeah because they're full of shit n hypocrite bud. The majority of gamers n influencers will be pre-ordering AC Red & TD3 making them huge successes the moment they are released & you'll understand who really call the shots nowadays and has been for years
Game publishers will never change because they’re never de incentivized from pushing consumers to their limits. The only real way to put a cap on this behavior is if a large publisher is pushed to bankruptcy. That’s the only real consequence they care about. I really don’t want to do that to the rank and file who genuinely want to work on games, but you have to consider, if we don’t do this will we just be hurting the more of the rank and file in the long run? That’s even if we *can* bankrupt a big publisher.
What were the empire shooting green blaster shots? Kind of established they use red.
1. Ubisoft
2. Disney Star Wars
3. Difference between real model of protagonist and in-game model
4. Ubisoft
5. Monetization and pricing
6. Ubisoft
2. Disney Star Wars ~~ You may have a "black woman" skywalker next time, they promised!
DEI
There is nothing wrong with the protagonist. The protagonist looks good.
Thats about it
@@BlackParade01I'm sure IGN france will proclaim her as "made by a person who clearly does nothing but look at REAL women all day everyday"
Can you imagine how the heartache of creators like you and me will amplify over the years as the games and cartoons we work on vanish?
I got into vo and game design partly because of a chronic disease. They told me I didn't have long to live (so far so good, anyway). So I wanted to leave a legacy of some kind, especially as I don't want to pass this on to any kids I would have had.
Now? Games I've worked on are gone. Cartoons, poof. Commercials you expect to come and go, but any sense of legacy is just... eliminated. A body of work is hard enough to make in an industry going through this much competition and transition, but this steals the future, itself.
Not to mention the protagonist looks like someone you’d see working at Spencer’s
This is such a solid take. Thank you! I love how you always present gaming news with a level head. You seem like such a genuine person who truly cares about the gaming industry and wants to see it thrive, not burn.
I'm excited for this game but I do think it's an example of a larger issue at play in regards to corporate greed and how greed is messing with the gaming industry. It's also like only to become a larger problem across the board for all media preservation if we don't take action now. With the new digital era, media and art preservation should be more, not less, common. And yet it feels like the digital age is threatening to control what media we get access to, and at our own expense. Focusing purely on what makes money at the time, as opposed to ensuring that art and culture are preserved as time goes on so we have access to an ever growing and expanding library.
Curious, if this game doesn't do well, will Ubisoft say single player games are dying? Like it wasn't there own fault.
Maybe, but who cares? They're losing relevance by the day. That "Ubislop" line is so accurate lol.
@@roflBeckTheir singleplayer games usually do extremely well and I dont see a reason this one will be different, there's always people calling them a shot company but that hasn't changed anything, they know their core audience and they know what they want.
Ubisoft being Ubisoft: Greedy and anti-consumer.
I have never ever opened my wallet to a Ubisoft game .
"Ubisoft Needs To Get Used To Not Selling What They’ve Made"
It's fairly obvious why a game would require "always online" it means they are going to have micro transactions/in game currency. If it wasn't always online you could cheat paid resources into your game.
Yeah it’s that simple.
But it’s not always online. All it means is you have to do a one-time online connection to install the game.
@@Ryan._ bet?
@@Ryan._ Yes and by connecting to their servers they can ensure that you're not altering your game data.
It also means they can shut it down at some point and you won't get access to your $130 purchase.
Ross Scott's video exposing the Crew, is the center reason why people hate Ubisoft.
Represent, yo.
Facts!
I've never heard of him, but I'm interested. What video? What was it about?
@@billybob7135 It's mentioned in the yongyea video. Just search for The largest campaign ever to stop publishers destroying games. It's by Accursed Farms
That is just going to suck for those poor and unfortunate people that don't have internet at all that will even anger them so much
They destroyed the main character’s image compared to the person who voice acts her.
Buy Stellar Blade instead.
they're both $70
@@Danny-mp8dq Yes, but no microtransactions, awesome game judging by the demo and you´ll support devs that are not scared of making beautiful women, unlike Ubisoft.
Check out what the model looks like
@@CZJames20 This character is based on a real woman just like Stellar Blade
I don't even have a horse in this race, though. I'm not buying it anyway solely because it's a Ubisoft game
Okay 👍
When I saw the pricing my jaw dropped then I realised it’s Ubisoft then it all made sense.
Surprised it’s not branded as a new AAAA game.
Cuz this one is world first quintuple games ever!
"AAAAh shit, look how much that costs"
the sad thing is, when this flops, they gonna go "no one is intrested in starwars" rather than it a case of no one wants to be robbed.
The online requirement kills this game for me, even tho im a huge star wars fan. No way will i buy a single player game that NEEDS an internet connection because thats just one step away from the consumer not owning their physical media!
We all dislike Ubisoft but the problem is people still continue to buy their games. They won’t stop doing this until we boycott them as a community 😑
Good on you for giving Ross a shout out. His efforts when it comes to fighting this always online stuff/games preservation is def to be commended.
I've been watching Ross Scott since the Machinima days, when he did Freeman's Mind and Civil Protection. He still does Freeman's Mind to this day, but I imagine this issue takes precedence since he's slowed on releases.
He's a real one. One of us.
Right, lets just ignore that fact that the main character's face design is based off a vampire bat.
Who gives a shit about that?
@@randomguy6679 Literally almost everyone.
@@Kahless_the_Unforgettable Those people don’t have their priorities straight. I personally play a game for gameplay myself. It’s almost like it’s a game or something…
@@randomguy6679There's a reason the model looks the way it does and why it isn't just a gray texture lmao what are you on about? Appearance is tied to game design
God all you guys do is out yourselves as never actually seeing a woman outside of adult videos
Well, I was told to get used to not owning their games. They’ve been doing a great job of that.
i basically refuse to play any game with a season pass any more.
What is the point even watching the trailer? It will either be cancelled or look nothing like this.
Yong please make a full video signal boosting accursaded farms video game preservation movement. We need as many eyes on this topic as possible if we hope to have an impact.
Characters used to not be ugly, now they are..... not an accident
I really hate how before the game is even out they strip it of content to sell it later as fake DLC instead of making real DLC full of content.
The only company who does DLC right is CDPR (Witcher 3) all the rest are thieves who just deprive a game of content to steal more of your money.
FromSoft
Yeah don't forget FromSoft. They really deliver on their DLC content.
There's also Larian. They WON'T do DLC because screw WotC and Hasbro.
Doom dlc was also pretty good and not cut content
Fromsoft
@@lorhoff Fromsoft
The part of game development that is too expensive is the executive’s salaries.
Ghost Recon Wildlands & Breakpoint also required a internet connection but I never had to have a internet connection to play the campaigns, only initially to install the games and that's it...
Ubisoft…. Open world…. “Editions”…. ALL the red flags.
Avoid.
Between Disney, Lucasfilm, and Ubisoft I absolutely 100% knew one of those 3 clowns would find a way to royally screw up what is a great idea for a Star Wars game
You forgot to add EA
@@thomasyip1925 EA is not working on this game
@@thomasyip1925EA made good star wars games battlefront 2 is good but it took some backlash to get there. Then fallen order was great. Haven’t played survivor tho
@@christoferrage Survivor's great, though I only thought Fallen Order was good.
@@iisanulquiorrahara8 then i must play it. But backlogs.
Major red flags everywhere, def ain’t preordering or buying it anytime soon even once it’s released 🙄🙄
At this point, if I hear "always online", I just assume it's going to be a waste of time and money, and not to even bother with it.
Avatar with a Star Wars skin? That's EXACTLY what I suspect.
I would only ever Pirate this game, with no DRM and no online connection required. Oh yeah, and no purchase price...
Here is a question, if Ubisoft think that owning games is a thing of the past and that we should embrace subscription services, then why are they charging more than $70 for an online game that it can be worthless if the servers goes down? 🤔
You know what? Yeah lol we should start asking them for subscription level prices XD
You can always get the ultimate edition through ubisoft+ or whatever lol
Are you stupid? Because they want you to subscribe to Ubisoft+
profit. they dont care if the servers go down, the only thing they care about is that they got your money. also here in canada that standard edition is 90 dollars, with tax it comes to $101.69 sooo.... yeah once they get your money they dont care. these game companies are trying to force you into the online service thing simply because they can control it and you. they dont want you to be able to use that physical copy you paid for so if they tie it to the online aspect and once the servers go down you wont be able to play it anymore and no matter how much you complain theyll laugh at you because they got your money. they dont care about anything else.
@@zarrurer12 every you said makes a lot of sense. I just feel like Ubisoft is not being consumer friendly. They want to be charging a lot of money on games with the online service aspect and games that don’t even look that great or longevity since they don’t want to keep it up to date for however long. Even if we own the physical media, once they shut down the servers there goes $130 and it just becomes paperweight. Their subscription isn’t that great either.
I remember the days when Ubisoft actually was a half decent company who was capable of making solid to good games on a fairly consistent basis. Those days are long gone unfortunately. Everywhere I look it feels like Ubisoft is always doing or saying something stupid.
Unless you’re the new Prince of Persia game.
I remember when i paid $100 for Diablo III from Gamestop. I waited in line at midnight to pick it up. It came with Diablo II in a soulstone thumbdrive, came with a DVD with special items on it, a hard cover game guide, a music cd... and a special box case. I seriously wish we could go back to that. Physical beautiful stuff... and i can still use it all years later
In Poland Star Wars Outlaws Ultimate Edition cost 539,90 PLN, where most common monthly pay is about 3200 PLN so yeah, it's really expensive
It's hard for me to get angry at this point. Ultimately, they wouldn't sell these editions if people weren't buying them. The sad truth is there's a large portion of gamers who are ever-willing to spend their hard-earned money on stupid shit. And so the companies sell us stupid shit. It's sad, but not surprising.
slowly most gamers are probably slowly realise they been playing the same ai generated games and stop spending that the greedy cooperation bleed money Xd
Amen brother
I only buy the collectors edition if its physical items. However this game will not be getting my money.
@@artgokrew I think for every gamer that wakes up to these companies 2 normies fall for these scams. That's the only explanation of ever increasing revenues to these companies
Corporations and politics: the two areas that specialize in making decisions to prey on the choices of the uninformed
Ubisoft’s “don’t shoot yourself in the foot” challenge **Impossible**
Dude, it's Star Wars, the time where this game could have had any potential at all is long past... XD
Anything Disney Star Wars is a hard pass to begin with.
there are several game companies that are an automatic NO BUY from me
-blizzard
-EA
-Activision
-Ubisoft
Same
+1
dont forget Bethesda
@@Fact0ryy or better, do! 😋
Yes !