Hello guys. As described, I am only concerned with an objective comparison of the capabilities of the two addons. Test.exe, malware or other topics from the past are not the topic. Please note this. I will remove any comments, as they are not effective.
The video was WAY too fast and didn't give me enough time to even pause to look at everything. Also you should frame the video side by side so you can directly see the differences better
Imo the fslabs MCP panel and center pedastal (and pratically everything else excluding the overhead) looks more like asobo texturing in contrast to the fenix, it's the same with the lights just seems exactly like asobo's MCP panel lights. I find it really weird and I don't know if it's just me.
Graphics-wise fenix definitely wins, I was surprised by that, though I was expecting Fslabs to do better than that. The look of the thrust levers, flap, and spoiler handles shocked me, Fslabs is way behind, the throttles looked oversized and less detailed. Fenix's attention to detail is amazing, it's really an eye candy. I wonder if fslabs flies better than fenix, if so, it would be a draw.
Fenix simulations and flight model were literally pulled out of a real a320 simulator to train pilots so of course there will be nothing better A32s than fenix a320 anywhere
@@karim5809 Sorry. My answer was directed at @ankitbhandari8752 in reply to the rubbish about the flight model being pulled from the real A320 Simulator. Prosim is Boeing not Airbus.
I wish there would be a proper comparison of both types, including textures, sounds and system depth, either as YT or blog or something along these lines.
Thank you very much for the comparison. It looks "okay-ish" but outdated, the fire extinguisher is octagonal and not round, the seats seem to don´t have a bumpmaps, the cockpit looks to dirty and worn on many panels. Thanks to your comparison videos I was now finally able to make a choice: I go for the Hotstart Challenger :)
fsl is already great, but unfortunately met fenix, I hope they will continue to polish the product, I look forward to their NEO. (Does anyone know how long it will take for neo to be listed)
Well, grphically FSLabs is inferior, but that's not their selling point. I cannot wait for someone who would compare system simulation and overall vibe.
That‘s right. I will try to compare the aircraft systems in the future. But it will be a 1 to 1 comparsion as well. Cause i am not a real life pilot and i can not judge, which system operate more realistic.
Beginner flightsimmers prefer texture quality over flight model quality, experienced flightsimmers prefer flight model quality over texture quality, on this point FSLabs beats Fenix, I prefer FsLabs.
@@Alexis67270 You can’t say that. I’ve logged more than 3000 flight hours on the A320 since FSX. Still, I set a high value on texturing and modeling. Does that make me a beginner and not experienced? It’s fine if *you* place more importance on the systems rather than the surroundings. But projecting your opinion onto everyone else isn’t fair.
I fully agree with you. FSlabs textures are more than sufficient for a great simulation experience. Technical depth is a much more important quality for serious simulation.
How many hours have you logged on the FSlabs because you see the Fenix still feels more realistic, especially when talking about feeling the weight of the plane.
@@sanndman88 Independent of the test.exe, which is not the topic here, I would prefer the Fenix as a complete package. However, that’s my personal opinion. Every aircraft has its strengths and weaknesses. It is important to remember that my comparison is only one-to-one. I cannot judge which system is implemented more or less realistically, as I am not a real pilot.
@@vasiliosgrekousis8192 Paranoid sheepie? They installed a file on every customers PC that STEALS personal information and sends it to their server unencrypted. Paranoid sheepie?? You must be Lefterises lover. If you like people installing DRM on your PC and charge you for it, then go for it more power to ya. But clearly you're a FSLabs fanboy so there is no point in even attemping any sort of argument with you.
@@vasiliosgrekousis8192 Could you please elaborate on how FSLabs wins? I'm really curious. I never said FSLabs was a bad product or a worse/better product than Fenix.
@@vasiliosgrekousis8192you’re such a professional at glazing, you could own a doughnut factory. To be fair, the FSlabs looks fine, I’ll probably pick up the neo when it comes out.
Both simulations run very well on my system. However, this always depends a lot on your own system. I would say that the FSL runs better on my hardware configuration.
@@CreativeJJJJs Yes, the plan is a lot of more Videos. The next upcoming Video is the outside modeling. A video about the cabin is planned. This is followed by the dynamic components (primary and secondary flight control surfaces), Engine spool up an so on. Stay tuned.
The flight model is where the FSLabs is really far superior, especially the flare. In almost all other areas they're about equal or the Fenix is better.
@@skeppo5586 mcdu startup is way more realistic, aoc simulation is much better, engine bleeds are much more accurate, techlog simulation is a very nice touch, gps jamming, and aside from systems the snow and icing simulation is just awesome.
@@skeppo5586 Pointless to explain. Search it. FSLabs goes way back. The Fenix is not coming anywhere close to the FSLabs. Even FSLabs in Prepar3D far superior to the Fenix... Engine mode selector in the Fenix, engine PSI is available right away, in FSLabs you can wait and see the PSI readings incrementing --- properly modeled even in Prepar3D, many other details that be too long to enumerate here...
Hello guys. As described, I am only concerned with an objective comparison of the capabilities of the two addons. Test.exe, malware or other topics from the past are not the topic. Please note this. I will remove any comments, as they are not effective.
In my opinion fenix is the best option
fslabs system better
for 3d yeah, but systems...
I agree
The video was WAY too fast and didn't give me enough time to even pause to look at everything. Also you should frame the video side by side so you can directly see the differences better
You can pause the video using the space bar. TH-cam also offers the option to slow down the video. To do this, click on the gear icon at the bottom.
@captainmauser4675 rather just have it there
@@captainmauser4675 The problem is that the side-by-side views transitions far too quickly. even if you pause you often don't get the timing right.
yeah, its alittle hard hear or see the diff
I agree that would have been nice to have a Side by side comparison.
I'm more than happy with the whole Fenix fleet. Don't regret it any moment. One of the best payware addons ever for flight simulation.
Imo the fslabs MCP panel and center pedastal (and pratically everything else excluding the overhead) looks more like asobo texturing in contrast to the fenix, it's the same with the lights just seems exactly like asobo's MCP panel lights. I find it really weird and I don't know if it's just me.
Graphics-wise fenix definitely wins, I was surprised by that, though I was expecting Fslabs to do better than that. The look of the thrust levers, flap, and spoiler handles shocked me, Fslabs is way behind, the throttles looked oversized and less detailed. Fenix's attention to detail is amazing, it's really an eye candy. I wonder if fslabs flies better than fenix, if so, it would be a draw.
Fenix simulations and flight model were literally pulled out of a real a320 simulator to train pilots so of course there will be nothing better A32s than fenix a320 anywhere
@@ankitbhandari8752Thats bs. Source please?
Albeit from a 737 platform. How can it be better? You obviously don't have a clue.
@@fubar8560 read my comment again 😑 I said “Graphics-wise it’s better” and everyone knows that, flying-wise I said I don’t know cuz I did not try it.
@@karim5809 Sorry. My answer was directed at @ankitbhandari8752 in reply to the rubbish about the flight model being pulled from the real A320 Simulator. Prosim is Boeing not Airbus.
I wish there would be a proper comparison of both types, including textures, sounds and system depth, either as YT or blog or something along these lines.
Thank you very much for the comparison. It looks "okay-ish" but outdated, the fire extinguisher is octagonal and not round, the seats seem to don´t have a bumpmaps, the cockpit looks to dirty and worn on many panels. Thanks to your comparison videos I was now finally able to make a choice: I go for the Hotstart Challenger :)
fsl is already great, but unfortunately met fenix, I hope they will continue to polish the product, I look forward to their NEO. (Does anyone know how long it will take for neo to be listed)
Fenix is the clear winner in this round, but there are many other factors to consider
Well, grphically FSLabs is inferior, but that's not their selling point. I cannot wait for someone who would compare system simulation and overall vibe.
That‘s right. I will try to compare the aircraft systems in the future. But it will be a 1 to 1 comparsion as well. Cause i am not a real life pilot and i can not judge, which system operate more realistic.
Beginner flightsimmers prefer texture quality over flight model quality, experienced flightsimmers prefer flight model quality over texture quality, on this point FSLabs beats Fenix, I prefer FsLabs.
@@Alexis67270 You can’t say that. I’ve logged more than 3000 flight hours on the A320 since FSX. Still, I set a high value on texturing and modeling. Does that make me a beginner and not experienced? It’s fine if *you* place more importance on the systems rather than the surroundings. But projecting your opinion onto everyone else isn’t fair.
@@MrEmbargo1985 This is obviously an opinion that is my own, I cannot speak on behalf of others. But that's my opinion.
I fully agree with you. FSlabs textures are more than sufficient for a great simulation experience. Technical depth is a much more important quality for serious simulation.
How many hours have you logged on the FSlabs because you see the Fenix still feels more realistic, especially when talking about feeling the weight of the plane.
So during your Test.exe of both aircraft, which do you prefer of the two?
@@sanndman88 Independent of the test.exe, which is not the topic here, I would prefer the Fenix as a complete package. However, that’s my personal opinion. Every aircraft has its strengths and weaknesses. It is important to remember that my comparison is only one-to-one. I cannot judge which system is implemented more or less realistically, as I am not a real pilot.
Paranoid Sheeple, relax. FSLabs still wins!
@@vasiliosgrekousis8192 Paranoid sheepie? They installed a file on every customers PC that STEALS personal information and sends it to their server unencrypted. Paranoid sheepie?? You must be Lefterises lover. If you like people installing DRM on your PC and charge you for it, then go for it more power to ya. But clearly you're a FSLabs fanboy so there is no point in even attemping any sort of argument with you.
@@vasiliosgrekousis8192 Could you please elaborate on how FSLabs wins? I'm really curious. I never said FSLabs was a bad product or a worse/better product than Fenix.
@@vasiliosgrekousis8192you’re such a professional at glazing, you could own a doughnut factory. To be fair, the FSlabs looks fine, I’ll probably pick up the neo when it comes out.
fenix for alot of reasons, best bang for the buck you can probably find for a airliner, better quality, and more,
How about performance? Which is heavier to run?
Both simulations run very well on my system. However, this always depends a lot on your own system. I would say that the FSL runs better on my hardware configuration.
Both beautiful. Great comparison. Looking forward to wing view with cabin. Is that coming?
@@CreativeJJJJs Yes, the plan is a lot of more Videos. The next upcoming Video is the outside modeling. A video about the cabin is planned. This is followed by the dynamic components (primary and secondary flight control surfaces), Engine spool up an so on. Stay tuned.
Ngl I really like the FSL PFD
The flight model is where the FSLabs is really far superior, especially the flare. In almost all other areas they're about equal or the Fenix is better.
I think you're completely skipping over the levels of system depth that fslabs has over fenix.
@@ckaviator757 What exactly does the fslabs have in system depth that is better than the fenix please elaborate.
@@skeppo5586 mcdu startup is way more realistic, aoc simulation is much better, engine bleeds are much more accurate, techlog simulation is a very nice touch, gps jamming, and aside from systems the snow and icing simulation is just awesome.
@@skeppo5586 Pointless to explain. Search it. FSLabs goes way back. The Fenix is not coming anywhere close to the FSLabs. Even FSLabs in Prepar3D far superior to the Fenix... Engine mode selector in the Fenix, engine PSI is available right away, in FSLabs you can wait and see the PSI readings incrementing --- properly modeled even in Prepar3D, many other details that be too long to enumerate here...
@@skeppo5586 rnav approaches, fenix rnav app system are a little bit buggy on this case
Slow down the side by side man...can't even see it
You know you have a spacebar right ?
@ What does that have to do with the break neck speed of the video examples?
@@JM1701ABCD well you can pause it when they are side by side
FS Labs with the P3D Graphic cant compare to Fenix. Good i didnt buy FS Labs. Fenix is the best Developer out there.