The upside to my lab not using automated machines is that we can run 110 about as cheaply as anything else, we just have a slower turnaround. :) (Alas, locals only because we can't handle the volume nor do we want to compete against other labs.) Love that they made this camera with some solid quality and modern scanning definitely makes 110 a little more viable than back in the day, at least in my opinion.
I can't judge if the quality here really makes a difference with the Agfmatic cameras from the 70's that I have ! This camera is quite expensive comparing to all the good enough 110 cameras that we can get on Ebay. But definitely love so much to shoot 110 films and would love to have this camera too !! I use Film Processing in Cornwall to get the dev+scan of these and yeah it's pricey :/
Molly Kate!!! Yet another exciting video??? We can only stand so much excitement!!! I must say that Lomography could have just reissued any old compact 110 camera, but though this one is similar in style and ergonomics to the 110 'push-pull' cameras -- it was *way* more features. And that is great because film photography can be as simple as 'point & shoot' -- or choose everything -- and Lomography has done a pretty decent job at giving their customers all of those options with this camera.... OK -- I need to take a nap -- too much excitement for today (shot a roll of Gold 120 in my Holga WPC today for World Pinhole Photography Day)!!
hahaha i need to make a not so exciting video next LOL everything in film is exciting tho!!! enjoy your nap and well done for getting that in for WPPD!
We do 110 dev for $7 and frontier scan it. Not any more difficult for us to load into a cartridge for roller transport than 120 (or anything else). Thanks!
@@Eclectachrome Thanks so much! Per TH-cam guidelines, it seems we cannot comment links, but it is displayed in our TH-cam "about" profile. Part of the reason for watching your video was deciding if we want to carry this camera and some 110 stocks. I think the answer is yes :). (Also we watch most of your videos - excellent comfort viewing for film nerds)
@@royalwefilmlab aw thank you, that's so nice of you to say...and especially if you have a good dev price that makes it more affordable for people to pick up some film and cameras from you too!
I will admit I haven’t sent any film here yet but Knoxville Film Lab does it all and pretty cheap. I’m getting an order ready to ship out soon. I bought a Rollei 110 camera recently on Ebay but I’m skeptical it works.
I just started developing 110 at home for the very reason you noted - the expense. Got a couple of reels from an Etsy store and they fit my Patterson tank.
Well thought out, with the exception of the lacking tripod mount for B mode. Especially the prospect of not having "mandatory flash use forced down my throat, won my heart! A suggestion, in line with the "essentials" philosophy of this design: How about a velcro patch or a magnet? @ Developement prices: What if photographers were willing to pay partially with time? People agree to wait until a laboratory had received a profitable batch of orders?
I LOVE 110 film and I would love to shoot much more of it, but as you said, getting it dev/scanned is SO expensive. Here in NYC, there are a few labs that have been around for awhile and have the capability to easily develop it for the same cost as a roll of 35, but the scanning bumps up the cost by A LOT because they all have to do it manually. Alas... it will, at least for the time being, be a special occasion film type.
I’ve been sending my 110 film to develop only and I scan them at home for now. Thinking of getting the tank and reels to do it myself at home but the small size scares me 😅
@@Eclectachrome most of the times I use a Minolta 110 zoom, second in the list a Minolta Autopak 460T. I also have a Pentax Auto 110 with all the lenses that I don't use as much as I'd want to. Then I got a Minolta Weathermatic A110 after I watched your video, but I haven't tried it yet 😅
110 is definitely far more economical to develop at home. Lomography sells a 110 mask to scan the film using a digital camera. Back in the 1960's and 1970's I used to process 16mm film, and reload 16mm cameras. They are virtually the same size as 110. They are fiddly to get onto the spools for the developing tank in the dark, but once loaded, everything else is easy. Best thing is it is possible to do several rolls in one batch with very careful attention to agitation. Something I have not done yet, is find a supplier of empty cartridges and loading fresh film into cartridges would mean expanded film options. I would like to try Delta 400 for a fine grain fast black and white. That is on the future experiments list. I love the look of Orca and Metropolis in 110. I haven't tried '92 yet. I wish Lomography would put CN400 into 110 cartridges, and I keep hoping they will bring back Peacock film. This new camera is brilliant except for the lack of tripod thread.
I want that camera so bad. I am 56 and 110 is what I grew up with. I just got a Minolta Zoom 110 SLR and love it. Miss old photo hut. Walgreens takes 3 weeks to process.😢
I am so thankful that I live in Indianapolis and Roberts Camera(local camera shop) can process 110 film in house for only $10. I love the format and hope it makes a comeback for others to enjoy more affordably.
Fun review and nice pics! My local lab develops 110 for $8. Pauls Photo in Torrance, California. I scan it myself using Lomo’s Digitiliza film holder. Did you have any issues with blank shots or the film not advancing properly? A couple of other reviewers did. Currently using the Rollei A110 which is half the size of the Lomomatic! And also the Pentax Auto 110. Both are excellent but I still want the Lomomatic. I’’m thinking in the peaches and cream colour, just because that is so fun!
I have blank frames and I've already shot 5-6 rolls of various stocks with mine. I have the silver model and the shutter button is just easy to press in such a way that the shutter doesn't open but the camera thinks it did. At least that's what I think is happening. I like it when it works but I have a bunch of blanks.
@@MatthewJeanes thanks for the reply. That’s not good, I have had two Lomo LC-A 120s that began shooting more and more blank frames until the shutters totally failed. Would make a click sound so you think it took a photo but nothing on the film. And now my LC-W is starting to do it too. It seems Lomo specs really weak shutters. Your camera is still under warranty so I would have them exchange it. Maybe they are aware and have fixed it since.
@@Eclectachrome thanks for the reply! I pretty much bought out KEH's stash of Fuji Superia 200 110 so if u ever make it out to the LA area and want to burn some on a photo walk.
Grrrr...those processing costs!!!! My first camera as a wee lass was a Kodak Pocket Instamatic 30 (the green button!) and I have a huge fondness for the format. But since my Pentax 110 is in good working order, I'll pass on the Lomo 110 camera. And did I mention I stink at zone focusing? Great video!
I'm not a big user of 110, but that camera looks cool, especially with that slide-to-wind option! Also the folks at Old School Photo Lab are awesome, they did a lot of my processing after my local lab stopped processing traditional B&W and Slide. I didn't use them for B&W for long, as I transitioned quickly to running my own B&W at home.
There are some digicams with similar but not identical form factor to this . Sony Cybershot DSC L1, (tiny little rectangular box like this ), Cybershot DSC U10/ U20/ U30, Cybershot DSC P series (100/120/150/200 are the best of these), Panasonic D snap (expensive), Canon Powershot S30-S80 (little bit more chunky but still a little brick shape and great cameras ) … all pretty small, fun, pocketable.
Your results look so good !!! I put a Peacock in my Lomomatic and cross-processed it. The grain was terrible. 😖 Have to use a Tiger next time. And … processing costs the same as 35 mm film at my lab. Lucky 🍀😮💨
i bought this after I tested one at a workshop and omg it's so much funnnn, I bought one and it's awesome. I live in NYC, so I'm incredibly lucky to have a lab that only charges 20 bucks
Hey. Love the videos...keep them coming. Quick (and odd) question...how many times do you need to open and close the camera to wind on to the next frame? Is it once or twice? Just thinking ahead to a really fast moving project. Thanks.
A comment to second yes, "second" one to 15: Besides interesting engaging and entertaining content, your spirit alone makes viewing your videos a joy! Thank you!
opening, closing, shooting like the AGFA Pocketcameras. In the seventies in Germany it was advertised as "Ritsch-Ratsch-Klick". Everyone here in my age saw it in tv.
I haven't used 110 film in 45 years. Was a good format, though. The cameras were relatively cheap, and Kodak film always colorful; thus, it was pretty hard for a novice to take a bad picture.
Inspired me to get some 110 film for an old camera, and if it works well I might treat myself to one of these cameras. The Lomography colour film is £10 delivered and developing with prints sent to my door is £12. Quite affordable for a fun retro experience.
@@Eclectachrome It's the United Kingdom. I've not tested out the developing yet but there are a few companies offering it - with prices starting at £6 for scans only. Delivered prints are £12.
I have one of the old Kodak 110 cameras but it's not in good working order. I do have a Pentax Auto 110, but I might grab one of these as well. Looks cool!
What a cool little camera! The only reason I don’t have 110 is developing and very limited amount of film for it. Nevertheless this could be such a nice camera for travel photography.
I’m old enough to remember the launch of the 110 film cartridge. At the time I thought , Why? Cheap 126 cameras weren't that much larger and the bigger negative gives a better quality image. The 110 cartridge was a novelty killed off by digital phone cameras. Now someone is relaunching it the question is still, why? If you want a small film camera, get yourself a used Olympus AX. You’ll pick one up for about the same cost as the model you are testing. It’s a full frame 35mm camera that fits easily in the pocket. It has an excellent 35mm f2.8 Zuiko lens focusing from 0.58m to infinity with a coupled rangefinder in the viewfinder. Shutter speeds from 1 sec to 1/500 second. Max aperture f2.8 min f22. It has a built in aperture priority metering system. Select your aperture and a needle in the viewfinder tells you the shutter speed the camera will use. A sliding clam shell cover protects the lens and disconnects the shutter release when closed. Other manufacturers produced similar models. Best of all it uses standard 35mm film cassettes. The cheapest film with the largest choice available these days. It’s also the cheapest to get processed, and anywhere that processes film will process 35mm. If you’re shooting Black & White the equipment to process your own film doesn’t cost the earth, and is relatively easy to do. I suppose it could be argued that the lens is too sharp to be “cool”. Maybe put the camera in a clear plastic bag to take your images!
I develop my own. Got a vintage yankee tank on ebay because the new one Yankee makes sucks. I Love 110 and shoot it all the time. Thanks for the video.
good point, 110 cameras are so cheap on the used market! but for someone who is maybe new to buying film cameras second hand and doesn't want to deal with sifting through, this could be worth it for them, I'm with you though, not sure I'd spend that much myself on this one now...
That would be helpful, but also it doesn’t take too much room to put a mount in that’s built in, perhaps their design though couldn’t work around it or didn’t consider it a factor
@@Eclectachrome The way the camera opens and closes, it was probably impossible to implement a tripod mount inside the camera. It could be implemented as an external piece that has a trough for the camera to sit on with the 1/4"-20 female tripod mount on the bottom. I have a similar one for an Osmo Pocket camera.
@@lesliefranklin1870 yeah for sure, it would be nice to see someone do that, or perhaps Lomography could offer it as an accessory. Maybe they figure though not so many folks might use that camera with the bulb mode for long exposures, also there might need to be a cable release system or self timer to help with the shake!
@@Eclectachrome dealing with their customer service has been difficult. they’re trying their level best to not honor their warranty. I’m never doing business with them again.
![Lomography Lomomatic 110 - Camera Review, Image Samples & A Brief History of 110! [Instant Review]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/pGEU5NxUE8w/mqdefault.jpg)
![Lomography Lomomatic 110 - Camera Review, Image Samples & A Brief History of 110! [Instant Review]](/img/tr.png)
The upside to my lab not using automated machines is that we can run 110 about as cheaply as anything else, we just have a slower turnaround. :) (Alas, locals only because we can't handle the volume nor do we want to compete against other labs.) Love that they made this camera with some solid quality and modern scanning definitely makes 110 a little more viable than back in the day, at least in my opinion.
that's awesome! i wish I love around you, would be there immediately lol Yesss, good point about the scanning!
My first camera as a child was a 110 film camera!
This one looks fantastic!
Thank you for putting this great review together 😊
Thanks for watching!
I have one of these in a vintage 110 and glad to see Lomography has put one together! Maybe look into investing into one after seeing this video.
Yeah, it's nice they are offering something new for the format they make!
I can't judge if the quality here really makes a difference with the Agfmatic cameras from the 70's that I have ! This camera is quite expensive comparing to all the good enough 110 cameras that we can get on Ebay. But definitely love so much to shoot 110 films and would love to have this camera too !! I use Film Processing in Cornwall to get the dev+scan of these and yeah it's pricey :/
yes definitely options on ebay will be cheaper but depends on what you like! it does add up for sure :)
Molly Kate!!! Yet another exciting video??? We can only stand so much excitement!!! I must say that Lomography could have just reissued any old compact 110 camera, but though this one is similar in style and ergonomics to the 110 'push-pull' cameras -- it was *way* more features. And that is great because film photography can be as simple as 'point & shoot' -- or choose everything -- and Lomography has done a pretty decent job at giving their customers all of those options with this camera.... OK -- I need to take a nap -- too much excitement for today (shot a roll of Gold 120 in my Holga WPC today for World Pinhole Photography Day)!!
hahaha i need to make a not so exciting video next LOL everything in film is exciting tho!!! enjoy your nap and well done for getting that in for WPPD!
Love the excitement!
We do 110 dev for $7 and frontier scan it. Not any more difficult for us to load into a cartridge for roller transport than 120 (or anything else). Thanks!
oh that's fabulous!!! great to know and thanks for commenting - do you have a link I can put in the description for your site?
@@Eclectachrome Thanks so much! Per TH-cam guidelines, it seems we cannot comment links, but it is displayed in our TH-cam "about" profile. Part of the reason for watching your video was deciding if we want to carry this camera and some 110 stocks. I think the answer is yes :). (Also we watch most of your videos - excellent comfort viewing for film nerds)
@@royalwefilmlab aw thank you, that's so nice of you to say...and especially if you have a good dev price that makes it more affordable for people to pick up some film and cameras from you too!
I will admit I haven’t sent any film here yet but Knoxville Film Lab does it all and pretty cheap. I’m getting an order ready to ship out soon. I bought a Rollei 110 camera recently on Ebay but I’m skeptical it works.
cool!! the Rollei 110 camera looks fun, let me know how it goes!
I just started developing 110 at home for the very reason you noted - the expense. Got a couple of reels from an Etsy store and they fit my Patterson tank.
oh cool! are those patterson reels?
Well thought out, with the exception of the lacking tripod mount for B mode. Especially the prospect of not having "mandatory flash use forced down my throat, won my heart! A suggestion, in line with the "essentials" philosophy of this design: How about a velcro patch or a magnet? @ Developement prices: What if photographers were willing to pay partially with time? People agree to wait until a laboratory had received a profitable batch of orders?
Here in Europe, the costs are not that bad. About 20 euros for a film and scanning - cheaper than shooting Polaroid and worth it, in my opinion!
that's not too bad!
Slightly jealous of you over here in Australia, even getting 35mm and 120 processed is expensive.
I LOVE 110 film and I would love to shoot much more of it, but as you said, getting it dev/scanned is SO expensive. Here in NYC, there are a few labs that have been around for awhile and have the capability to easily develop it for the same cost as a roll of 35, but the scanning bumps up the cost by A LOT because they all have to do it manually.
Alas... it will, at least for the time being, be a special occasion film type.
have you tried 5R Photolab? They're p cheap at 20 bucks
I’ve been sending my 110 film to develop only and I scan them at home for now. Thinking of getting the tank and reels to do it myself at home but the small size scares me 😅
that's a good way to split the cost! what do you scan it with?
Oh, yeah. I am into 110. I process black and white at home and color at the lab. Super cool 🙂
fantastic!! what's your camera of choice?
@@Eclectachrome most of the times I use a Minolta 110 zoom, second in the list a Minolta Autopak 460T. I also have a Pentax Auto 110 with all the lenses that I don't use as much as I'd want to. Then I got a Minolta Weathermatic A110 after I watched your video, but I haven't tried it yet 😅
@@gianlusc lovely! ohh the weathermatic is so fun in the weather :)
@@Eclectachrome I plan to take it with me to the beach this coming summer 🙂👍🏻
110 is definitely far more economical to develop at home. Lomography sells a 110 mask to scan the film using a digital camera. Back in the 1960's and 1970's I used to process 16mm film, and reload 16mm cameras. They are virtually the same size as 110. They are fiddly to get onto the spools for the developing tank in the dark, but once loaded, everything else is easy. Best thing is it is possible to do several rolls in one batch with very careful attention to agitation.
Something I have not done yet, is find a supplier of empty cartridges and loading fresh film into cartridges would mean expanded film options. I would like to try Delta 400 for a fine grain fast black and white. That is on the future experiments list.
I love the look of Orca and Metropolis in 110. I haven't tried '92 yet. I wish Lomography would put CN400 into 110 cartridges, and I keep hoping they will bring back Peacock film.
This new camera is brilliant except for the lack of tripod thread.
I want that camera so bad. I am 56 and 110 is what I grew up with. I just got a Minolta Zoom 110 SLR and love it. Miss old photo hut. Walgreens takes 3 weeks to process.😢
aw nice that Walgreens still does it tho! or are they sending it away somewhere?
They are sending it out to be processed which, is what they say, is the reason it takes so long. I miss photo huts of my day.
I am so thankful that I live in Indianapolis and Roberts Camera(local camera shop) can process 110 film in house for only $10. I love the format and hope it makes a comeback for others to enjoy more affordably.
that's fabulous!!
Fun review and nice pics! My local lab develops 110 for $8. Pauls Photo in Torrance, California. I scan it myself using Lomo’s Digitiliza film holder. Did you have any issues with blank shots or the film not advancing properly? A couple of other reviewers did.
Currently using the Rollei A110 which is half the size of the Lomomatic! And also the Pentax Auto 110. Both are excellent but I still want the Lomomatic. I’’m thinking in the peaches and cream colour, just because that is so fun!
I have blank frames and I've already shot 5-6 rolls of various stocks with mine. I have the silver model and the shutter button is just easy to press in such a way that the shutter doesn't open but the camera thinks it did. At least that's what I think is happening. I like it when it works but I have a bunch of blanks.
@@MatthewJeanes thanks for the reply. That’s not good, I have had two Lomo LC-A 120s that began shooting more and more blank frames until the shutters totally failed. Would make a click sound so you think it took a photo but nothing on the film. And now my LC-W is starting to do it too.
It seems Lomo specs really weak shutters. Your camera is still under warranty so I would have them exchange it. Maybe they are aware and have fixed it since.
I didn't have any blank frames but I only shot one roll but that's not good if the camera does that!
@@Eclectachrome thanks for the reply! I pretty much bought out KEH's stash of Fuji Superia 200 110 so if u ever make it out to the LA area and want to burn some on a photo walk.
Grrrr...those processing costs!!!! My first camera as a wee lass was a Kodak Pocket Instamatic 30 (the green button!) and I have a huge fondness for the format. But since my Pentax 110 is in good working order, I'll pass on the Lomo 110 camera. And did I mention I stink at zone focusing? Great video!
haha thank you Sara! yeah the Pentax 110 is a great camera and I would imagine nicer to use than the Lomomatic :)
I'm not a big user of 110, but that camera looks cool, especially with that slide-to-wind option! Also the folks at Old School Photo Lab are awesome, they did a lot of my processing after my local lab stopped processing traditional B&W and Slide. I didn't use them for B&W for long, as I transitioned quickly to running my own B&W at home.
yeah the slide to wind is cool! their quality is super high! that's awesome though, how was the shipping between US/CAN?
@@Eclectachrome I honestly can’t remember, it was over ten years since I last used them!
Wonder if anyone will make a 110 style and shape digi cam? Gives you the experience without the inevitable expense.
interesting thought!
There are some digicams with similar but not identical form factor to this . Sony Cybershot DSC L1, (tiny little rectangular box like this ), Cybershot DSC U10/ U20/ U30, Cybershot DSC P series (100/120/150/200 are the best of these), Panasonic D snap (expensive), Canon Powershot S30-S80 (little bit more chunky but still a little brick shape and great cameras ) … all pretty small, fun, pocketable.
Your results look so good !!! I put a Peacock in my Lomomatic and cross-processed it. The grain was terrible. 😖 Have to use a Tiger next time. And … processing costs the same as 35 mm film at my lab. Lucky 🍀😮💨
oh nice! great its not too expensive, but yeah Tiger might be the way to go, although xpro sounds cool, did you like the photos aside from the grain?
i bought this after I tested one at a workshop and omg it's so much funnnn, I bought one and it's awesome. I live in NYC, so I'm incredibly lucky to have a lab that only charges 20 bucks
That's great!!
Hey. Love the videos...keep them coming. Quick (and odd) question...how many times do you need to open and close the camera to wind on to the next frame? Is it once or twice? Just thinking ahead to a really fast moving project. Thanks.
I think it's just once from memory - one in and one out then your ready for the next frame
A comment to second yes, "second" one to 15: Besides interesting engaging and entertaining content, your spirit alone makes viewing your videos a joy! Thank you!
thank you!!
opening, closing, shooting like the AGFA Pocketcameras. In the seventies in Germany it was advertised as "Ritsch-Ratsch-Klick". Everyone here in my age saw it in tv.
that's such a cool name!
I haven't used 110 film in 45 years. Was a good format, though. The cameras were relatively cheap, and Kodak film always colorful; thus, it was pretty hard for a novice to take a bad picture.
Cool background songs, what's the Band..?
hey sorry I meant to look it up for you ages ago but I can't find the band now! I used Epidemic Sound for the music.
@@Eclectachrome Hey thanks, I just found ot, it's actually "Hold it back" by Kylie Dailey.
@@Iyanrach oh awesome thanks!!
there are several how to videos on YT about turning a normal dev reel into a 110 real by cutting it down. i made one and it works great!
Thanks for the info!
Is 23mm really that wide though? On 110 that's pretty much a normal lens, I think.🤔
I think it’s a factor of 2 so yeah, the field of view of a 46 mm lens on a 35 mm camera.
Inspired me to get some 110 film for an old camera, and if it works well I might treat myself to one of these cameras. The Lomography colour film is £10 delivered and developing with prints sent to my door is £12. Quite affordable for a fun retro experience.
Ooooo awesome!!!! Where is the lab located? Hope it goes well!
@@Eclectachrome It's the United Kingdom. I've not tested out the developing yet but there are a few companies offering it - with prices starting at £6 for scans only. Delivered prints are £12.
@@TheGramophoneGirl ok yeah that's where I've seent the best developing prices for 110 too! so nice that's available :)
I have one of the old Kodak 110 cameras but it's not in good working order. I do have a Pentax Auto 110, but I might grab one of these as well. Looks cool!
ah the Pentax is top though! :)
What a cool little camera! The only reason I don’t have 110 is developing and very limited amount of film for it. Nevertheless this could be such a nice camera for travel photography.
absolutely!
I’m old enough to remember the launch of the 110 film cartridge. At the time I thought , Why? Cheap 126 cameras weren't that much larger and the bigger negative gives a better quality image. The 110 cartridge was a novelty killed off by digital phone cameras. Now someone is relaunching it the question is still, why?
If you want a small film camera, get yourself a used Olympus AX. You’ll pick one up for about the same cost as the model you are testing. It’s a full frame 35mm camera that fits easily in the pocket. It has an excellent 35mm f2.8 Zuiko lens focusing from 0.58m to infinity with a coupled rangefinder in the viewfinder. Shutter speeds from 1 sec to 1/500 second. Max aperture f2.8 min f22. It has a built in aperture priority metering system. Select your aperture and a needle in the viewfinder tells you the shutter speed the camera will use. A sliding clam shell cover protects the lens and disconnects the shutter release when closed. Other manufacturers produced similar models.
Best of all it uses standard 35mm film cassettes. The cheapest film with the largest choice available these days. It’s also the cheapest to get processed, and anywhere that processes film will process 35mm. If you’re shooting Black & White the equipment to process your own film doesn’t cost the earth, and is relatively easy to do.
I suppose it could be argued that the lens is too sharp to be “cool”. Maybe put the camera in a clear plastic bag to take your images!
I develop my own. Got a vintage yankee tank on ebay because the new one Yankee makes sucks. I Love 110 and shoot it all the time. Thanks for the video.
that's awesome, I've never heard of Yankee before, where can you find them?
I need it.
Interesting. But there are so many 110 cameras at yard sales, Goodwill, and eBay selling for pennies that I can't see buying this for $150+.
good point, 110 cameras are so cheap on the used market! but for someone who is maybe new to buying film cameras second hand and doesn't want to deal with sifting through, this could be worth it for them, I'm with you though, not sure I'd spend that much myself on this one now...
Shooting BW film makes 110 much cheaper. It's easy to process yourself.
It just overall is too expensive as you only have one film stock only sold by one company.
C41 is a developing process independent of film size.
of course :)
That camera reminds me of a Nokia phone back when they were still on top of their game lol
haha I had one of those!!!! they were awesome :) and so true!
@@Eclectachrome Aaaawesome!
Someone will likely make a tripod mount for a 3D printer.
That would be helpful, but also it doesn’t take too much room to put a mount in that’s built in, perhaps their design though couldn’t work around it or didn’t consider it a factor
@@Eclectachrome The way the camera opens and closes, it was probably impossible to implement a tripod mount inside the camera. It could be implemented as an external piece that has a trough for the camera to sit on with the 1/4"-20 female tripod mount on the bottom. I have a similar one for an Osmo Pocket camera.
@@lesliefranklin1870 yeah for sure, it would be nice to see someone do that, or perhaps Lomography could offer it as an accessory. Maybe they figure though not so many folks might use that camera with the bulb mode for long exposures, also there might need to be a cable release system or self timer to help with the shake!
lame that they want you to promote their product but don't even let you keep it. $60 going to break lomographys bank?
if you're looking into this camera, don't. mine came with a busted flash
That’s a bummer, have you tried to get a new one or replacement?
@@Eclectachrome dealing with their customer service has been difficult. they’re trying their level best to not honor their warranty. I’m never doing business with them again.