Heidegger's "Letter on Humanism"

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 12

  • @PowerPointSh0w
    @PowerPointSh0w 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Really appreciate guys who can penetrate the difficulty of the idea.

  • @karenibanez1529
    @karenibanez1529 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very straightforward and interesting analysis. Thank you for sharing!

  • @jessicabsable
    @jessicabsable 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for the video!! I'm studying it to do a PHD selection here in Brazil, and you made some great points that have helped me to understand it better!!

  • @mikechristian-vn1le
    @mikechristian-vn1le 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The Roman Lucretius' ON THE NATURE OF THINGS is a poem that explains Epicurean philosophy, written during the first century before Christ, during Julius Caesar's life and the Republic's end times.

  • @vojtasommer9009
    @vojtasommer9009 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This helped me a lot with my seminary work. Thanks

    • @TeacherOfPhilosophy
      @TeacherOfPhilosophy  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Glad to hear it!

    • @TeacherOfPhilosophy
      @TeacherOfPhilosophy  5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      And oh my goodness! You're studying Heidegger in seminary!?!?! That's fun.
      If this is more than a one-time reading in one course, I strongly recommend Jean-Luc Marion. His book _God Without Being_ borrows from Heidegger for theology purposes.

    • @nidhi1966
      @nidhi1966 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This is nice to begin with Letter on Humanism. Thanks

  • @Sim.on.h
    @Sim.on.h 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video!

  • @robertmontgomery6256
    @robertmontgomery6256 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🙏. So he chooses once again as in Being and Time to oppose science in the name of mysticism and irrationalism. He evades these labels by invoking poetry and who doesn’t like poetry?

    • @TeacherOfPhilosophy
      @TeacherOfPhilosophy  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      More likely he's just opposing scientISM. But this is Heidegger, and I can't pretend fo understand all that much!

    • @Impaled_Onion-thatsmine
      @Impaled_Onion-thatsmine 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Old science is a part process that had been reversed by the categories perceiving things as they are unknowable possibly a probability in the mind through the senses with language and the act that's the real at any point of view or not but is specific to his present sense terms as the significant relay of the mind and theory on knowledge he attacks old science as an ontology in the mind of a singular perception that reveals itself through desiring thought and knowledge through changeable concepts categories reverse to process an ontology that's deconstructive