Sartre and Heidegger
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ส.ค. 2022
- You can find Satre's work here www.amazon.com/Being-Nothingn... and Heidegger's work here www.amazon.com/Being-Harper-P...
This is the official TH-cam channel of Dr. Michael Sugrue.
Please consider subscribing to be notified of future videos, as we upload Dr. Sugrue's vast archive of lectures.
Dr. Michael Sugrue earned his BA at the University of Chicago and PhD at Columbia University.
![[Full Episode] MasterChef Junior Thailand มาสเตอร์เชฟ จูเนียร์ ประเทศไทย Season 3 Episode 6](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/CVUx09Rx0-M/mqdefault.jpg)
"to be honest, there are few things as unreadable as heidegger."
Sugrue is my favorite philosophical standup comedian.
@@batmanbad5091 you really must see for yourself, i believe...if you have the book, that's easy.
I wouldn't even try, thats why I watch these.
"philosophical standup comedian", lmao this fits too well.
The Presocratics had better one-liners than Henny Youngman. "Take my philosophy, please!" [BA-BOOM!]
Same here!
Man Heidegger sure would be upset I was learning about his ideas from a phone.
Under appreciated comment
howd you do that
Especially not in german
Why? He explicitly said he’s not against technology.
Haha, tremendous 😂
RIP Doc. Your thoughts through your words shared here online survives.
Sorry, who's DOC?
RIP one of the greatest
Thank you as ever Michael and his daughter for uploading this content!
Yes, we must be grateful ! I appreciate intelligence.
12:00 Heidegger on technology
26:04 Sartre: “Like it or not, we are free.” Sugrue: “That is the human condition! That’s what it means to be a subject as opposed to an object, and the difference between subjects and objects is what makes Sartre’s philosophy (work)”.
31:00 Sartre: “ freedom is the human condition and we must confront it.“
Sugrue: “There are no moral rules, but at least there could be moral heroism.”
31:25 Sartre vs. Spinoza (Deterministic and Cartesian): functional opposites
Oh Michael what a remarkable thread you weave!
34:30 Sugrue: “We are playing tennis with the net down.” Wow I love that! ❤️
35:13 …Sartre fought the Nazis. Heidegger put on the Swastica, and give a rousing speech (advocating Nazi control of the University) in 1936.
The great professor Sugrue ❤ thank you wherever you are now
Why on earth would i even pay a dime for traditional philosophy lectures if i can watch this hot piece of knowledge, for free! This stuff is golden. Please keep uploading!!
To support a philosopher/teacher? Without it, they end up working in a book store - which are mostly all closed.
Still agree with you, the internet isn't completely evil is it?
I still go to old book stores.
It is true that only the use of the internet are programs one may learn from.
You don’t get an accredited degree from TH-cam
I agree with you! Many colleges are becoming swamps of ideologies and no longer teach critical thinking.
What a gift he left us with these videos. Rest in peace and thank you.
coming from a university student who for a long while has done private learning/reading on a lot of these greats, i must say that while sugrue has introduced me to plenty and given a good roadmap for certain schools of theory that i was less familiar with, this is not necessarily what makes him impactful for me.
what sugrue has done is i think even more meaningful. Dr. sugrue has taught naturally by example a way of communicating more “dry” figures and their concepts in a way that is so inviting, so full of passion. he’s taught me a certain affect to use when i’m just dying to communicate something from the books i’m reading to friends of mine that may be nowhere near familiar with the subjects. this romantic intellectual spirit of his reminds me a lot of the old academic men of the church i was raised with- explaining such niche technical concepts of a reading with the welcoming and communicative tone that, while they still may not understand fully the topic by the end, could at least even keep schoolchildren captivated.
as people who choose to engage with these ideas that many folks today see as either too boring or too challenging, we must take from sugrue’s example and learn to be such good communicators that people can’t help staying engaged with. if we want any chance of sharing these topics of our long reading i suppose.
this is what i’ve needed to articulate for so long, this is what sugrue above all else has truly gifted me with.
i’m only 22 and i believe the example sugrue has given me will stay with my methods of speech for the rest of my life. makes me feel a bit less lonely doing all this stupid stupid reading.
Watch a film called "The Alpinist". This young man reminded me of myself at his age, and I never left the ground. If you hope to succeed at any demanding endeavor, you must embrace the fact that serious study and quality work entails solitude. As I used to demand of my students, "When are these books scheduled to read themselves?" God bless.
@@dr.michaelsugrue a blessing to hear from you. i will watch this film, and continue doing the private, long work with my books. wish me luck in keeping my charm, for i fear that too much seclusion may break up my confidence in talking to those wild girls.
i think i’ll make it.
I'm 21 and I feel the same!
Beautiful, GENUINE comment! Thank you! I’m 22 and feel similar. Since your post is from a year ago, I suppose you are 23 now. How has the last year been since posting this and getting advice from Dr. Sugrue? (Who has since passed on, may he rest in peace)
Such an amazing professor….best philosophy communicator out there IMHO🤓🤩🎓
Thank you and your daughter for uploading this again. I watch and rewatch, listen. Philosophy is a love. I hope you are doing well. Sir. I know you have been ill for some time. Thank you for your dedication to being a professor all these years.❤️ Also, respectively, may I add you are a handsome man, even if you are older now. I am aware that this is short and not the complete lecture on Satre and Heidegger. Your intelligence and heart are who we are ( We grow) Diazine, far out.
Good pickup line!
@@pinosantilli3371 Well, who are you?
@@cheri238 im nobody who r u?
@Pino Santilli Which prestigious college did you go to? Not that is any of my business . lol Professor Sugre, I admire him greatly. I do read books 📚 I only have a GED, but I educated myself. As inarticulate as I may sound to you evidently, I assure you I am not incaponious as you think me to be. HAPPY HOLIDAYS 💥🤶🎄
@@cheri238 what? I like the professor too have been listening to all the lectures. Why are you so upset at me? I like ur spunk tho ANNA.
Brilliant teacher. Thank you.
Thank you God for Socrates, Plato, Aristotle and Aquinas. Thank you for sanity. Great lecture. Beautiful. Educate.. means to ex ducare... to lead out. In this case out of existentialist darkness.. .the mind without reason. Thanks so much professor.
What a beautiful lecture thank you
I’ve been missing more Sugrue lectures. Finally some more to watch!
It's always a pleasure to see another Sugrue lecture. Thanks for the upload!
New Sugrue? Don't mind if I do.
Thank you again, Dr. Sugrue. I enjoy these lectures immensely, even if I have to watch them 2 or 3 times to grasp it all. Sometimes I read or watch other videos on the same subject and then listen to you again.
I finished reading Albert Camus - Myth of Sisyphus. I must say that I truly struggled with the ideas, the structure, the philosophy, the semantics, in every line was I compelled to read twice! Staggeringly brilliant work of Philosophy. I am proud to say that I got a lot from the book even though I spent interminable hours and pages trying to understand what he meant by 'the absurd'.
Thanks again for the upload Professor Sugrue. 👍
Professor you are a fine art in what you were doing 👏🏿
Existentialism is probably more important now than ever in this age of militant politically weaponized science. STEM is a distraction from what it means to be human, and now the humanities are cast aside and even laughed at. People always seem to find a way to make the world more and more depressing.
Thank you Dr Sugrue!
absolutely priceless lecture. Michael Sugrue is a gift for humanity. Thank you, Sir! Greetings from Romania!
Camus can do, but Sartre is smartre
Well Scooby-Doo can doodoo, but Jimmy Carter is smarter! [tumbleweed blows by]
i’m obama and i just ate a llama
Hei-degger, Hei-degger was a boozy beggar who was just as schloshed as Schlegel...
Gene Wilder lives on
@xxcrysad3000xx Screw off!! Lol, ⛄️🎄⛄️Happy Holidays
Thank you Lord Sugrue
Dr. Sugrue - TY 🙏❤️
A NEW LECTURE AT LAST THANK YOU MR SUGRUE
What a beautiful lecture
Masterpiece of a lecture. Do not despair fellow philosophers. Good is real and it’s exemplified in this lecture.
Delightful lecture. Another triumph.
Thank you for your work.
Phenomenal lecture. Sugrue is a treasure. I’d love to hear him address how Sartre’s statement that “we are condemned to freedom” wrestles with the belief of some modern philosophers, like Sam Harris, that we don’t have any free will at all.
I thought sartre's view was that we MUST have free will.
I haven't read much by Harris, I watched his discussion with Jordan Peterson and found his philosophy to be quite naive and idealist
@@imranzero the thing about Harris' free will isn't much philosophical as it is scientific (from his point of view). He argues that we live in a deterministic world (far all human intents and purposes), so we don't have free will. For what it's worth, I don't think that's inherently incompatible with free will in the Sartre sense. Daniel Dennett argues that we can have free will, even in a deterministic world, and I think that works well with Sartre's notion.
I have listened to Jordan Peterson a few times, but I shy away from him for reasons that he is not free inside himself.
Great way to spend my break at work.
i just got your Plato/Socrates lectures on Audible because of this channel. it's also excellent.
This guy is such a good teacher.
Thanks Doc
I think Heidegger (at least in B&T) is a bit more rigorous and precise than indicated here. So when Prof. Sugrue interprets Dasein as being-in-the-world as "subjective," he does so without mentioning H's arguments against Cartesian foundationalism. The closer analogy made in this lecture is to the late Wittgenstein's concept of "forms of life." We do not, for Heid (and Sartre's a bit different here) interpret the world as individual subjects. Being human already presupposes a world into which we are "thrown" (geworfenheit) -- a world in which culture, social norms, language, and meanings are already up and running when we arrive. "Historicity" is, for H, the ground of Dasein. Being-in-the-world is (in B&T) has more to do with practices than concepts. We learn how to use tools, to communicate, to get on with everyday life with others. That's not groundless or subjective but it is a shared ground. We aren't solipsists in our own worlds. Someone is born into the Hellenistic world, another into the modern Western world. These bring very different pre-understandings, understandings of our "heritage" and "fate," H. says. Our possibilities as human beings (Dasein roughly) are largely provided by historical context and not mere subjective whim. To be "authentic" one must not flee from their "historicity." So, subjects do not construct meanings arbitrarily but as "thrown projects"-- historically conditioned beings with future possibilities ("projects") that are largely structured by that historicity (which is part of a shared world and not a "private" subjective realm like the Cartesian ego-- the "ghost in the machine").
What is your point?
Heidegger's apprehension regarding technology becomes more apparent in his later works, in particular his essay "The Question Concerning Technology".
@@xxcrysad3000xx like most philosophers the early work seems to be only a cleaning up or rehearsal of later, better stated ideas.
@@OnerousEthic obvious, except to you
> To be "authentic" one must not flee from their "historicity."
Ayn Rand regarded spiritual independence as a basic moral virtue and spiritual dependence a vice. See her, _The Fountainhead_. Heidegger's authenticity is merely and dangerously emotional. At the 1930s Nazi rallies, not losing yourself to the emotions of Hitlers speeches was improper.
I am so grateful for this mind-food
I just coomed when I saw that it was posted today. Just listened to the Kierkegaard one yesterday
So good. Thank you
Thank you so much professor Michael.
Amazing!
Most awaited. I was astonished that Sir Surgue didn't speak about Sarte
this man could change the world
Woah that was heavy ✌️ so much said also by the eyes
Can understand how the tape would have got those worn sections, ho hum, lol 😁
Thanks so much for the upload work plus of course the intellectual and educational sheer heroicism 🙏
The need to reconcile our notions of reason and emotion in the midst of the interpolation of those experiences neurologically, will perhaps always pose a challenge to humanity. We are very much living in a world today that compels one to act, where everyone is a hero, and where we are to regard sentiment over science and rationality. Our current analogs to the 20th century and Heidegger's appeal are impossible to ignore.
Thank you for this thought provoking and artistic content.
Exactly how I feel. Its easy to recognize Surgue’s ‘nausea’ when it comes to his inability to come to terms with the abyss that is the limitation of rationality.
One of the most important lectures
The metaphor of "playing tennis with the net down" doesn't allow the existential viewpoint to be properly understood. Existentialism leans into the forces which constantly erect nominal nets. The Dasein of existentialism is never forward of the net being down. The dialectic between existentialism and what existentialism intends to reveal as without ground, never collapses. It's not a situation which draws out despair, rather it draws out an active and singular Dasein (human agency). The heroism, if that is what it is, is to press forward despite groundlessness. Press forward into the Dasein which argues for ground, which never allows for there to be no net. The Dasein voice here, is both philosophical and poetic; why not use all resources which are to hand and possible. Michael appears to be thinking that humanity cannot cope with the individual being individual. The essence of existentialism is Dasein and how Dasein mediates being; a mediation which allows for being an existential individual, and allows for all else in which human occurrence has subsisted, currently subsists, and might subsist in a future. Michael is able to wonderfully depict existentialism technically, but is heart (his Dasein) isn't with the existential understanding, albeit he ends laying aside the existential viewpoint, but without revealing why, without revealing what alternative viewpoint (Dasein) he commits to.
How could you do such lectures? It was like reciting a text of about 5000-7000 words by heart! Incredible!
I think much of the time. When I lectured I used to think and let other people hear about it.
@@dr.michaelsugrue Well, in that case, a really remarkable ability to instantly translate thoughts into articulate language. Congrats!
💯 correct. Passion!!!
Thank you.
Heroism?? That's not a word I would use to describe Heidegger! What a coward he was!
Also, I (and Bertrand Russell) would say there are solutions to philosophical questions, but when we have those solutions, they turn into a separate discipline.
thank you
I think I've said it before, but these lectures have helped me through some shit.
wow gap filled fantastic ❤️👍
❤️❤️❤️
great lecture
I love this guy.
The professor might be the only person that can fully convince me of the value of a philosopher/philosophical movement then eviscerate it completely and make its flaws naked and bare.
I wouldn't say H. is a techo-phobe. He says it is a clearing and salvation as well as destructive force. He just wants us to be reflective about how we use it and what it can turn us into: standing reserve.
standing reserve?
@@TeaParty1776 Yes, "bestand/bestehen" in the German, that which is ready and waiting to be used/useful.
@@philosophy_schilling Did Heidegger accept only primitive tech? And because little reasoning was needed to use it?
@@TeaParty1776 No, he was accepting of going along with the development of modern technology as long as we always reflected and were aware of how we were using it and allowing ourselves to be used by it. He had a nuanced view.
@@philosophy_schilling He seemed think, at least, that the rationality needed for tech was only only one consciousness and not the most important one. The fanatical faith in Hitler despite his bizarre incompetence is a rejection of rationality.
This guy is awesome.
TY 🦉
Engagement.
Thank ya kindly.
Man as social creature: Positivist
Man as individual creature: Continental
Man: Agents attuned to physiological individuality AND psychological sociality who is ultimately concerned with individual psychologies AND social physicality
Nice
Sugrue was a god damned genius.
🔥🔥🔥
M. Surge is intelligent & humble
Rest in peace you absolute legend
This must be an earlier edition of the great minds of the intellectual tradition … because in the addition I have Heidegger has its own lecture … but I enjoyed what is new content to me… comparison of the key existentialists useful…seeing 20th century existentialism as an extension of 19th century romanticism keeping rationalist tendencies in check … we have the same problem with 21st century with artificial intelligence … the perennial problem and tension of what it means to be human
Ahh, ways of avoiding the burdens of freedom! That sounds very familiar...especially nowadays!
another banger
Mega.
If only I found these lectures 35 years ago
LETS GOOOOOOO
If we had a machine that was capable of providing us with knowledge of our future action, becoming aware of that knowledge would change our future actions. It would end up in a kind of feed back loop.
37:50 onwards is the best summary of Existentialism I've heard.
❤️❤️
Great video. Is the criticism of "as many understandings as understanders" applicable to every dogma as well? Every believer has their own take on the god/philosphy they believe in?
These lectures are brilliant. And if you close your eyes, it sounds like Jerry Seinfeld is teaching you the history of western philosophy.
Jimmy Fallon's a little bit closer, I believe, I don't know who Dr. Sugrue sounds like? I feel like Timothy Leary or the dad from blossom
What are you? Comedians ? LOL
SHIIIIEEEETTT Sugrue on Sartre here we come
Beneath your comment here, YT(I guess) subtitles, "Translate to English" (!!)
I miss him.
sugrue always in the most liminal locations
What teaching company course was this part of … I thought I had seen them all
Read Sartre for yourself. An irreplaceable experience. Fortunately, there is English translation. The Chinese translation is incomprehensible for Chinese.
If you guys have a hidden lecture on Albert Camus , I am going to lose my mind..
Me too
Who is uploading these gems
The last 10 minutes of this lecture are both phenomenally rewarding to comprehend, and phenomenally difficult to understand, IMHO!
I had to listen many times to follow the brilliance of Sugrue, lecturing as if he were standing on the shoulders of Heidegger and Sartre!
Or is it the last 20 minutes? Or the last 45?
True i had to literally; turn on the [cc], decrease speed to 7.5, and attempt to write every word he said in those last 15 minutes or so! Why? Same reason as you describe
Is Fyodor Dostoevsky considered a precursor of existentialism as well because his novels have somewhat existentialist themes?
Yes, by many.
can anyone please tell me what the intro piece is?
There's a great Woody Allen movie on TH-cam where they talk about metaphysics and philosophy it's based on Tolstoy's war and Peace I think it's called love and death. It's VERY good I'd link it but they might pull this down
How many of these are yet to be uploaded?!?!
'better a hellish silence than a purgatory full of scientists'
Professor Sugrue actually struggles for words for a second or two at 4:20.
In anyone else, this wouldn't be the slightest bit notable! His fluency is amazing.
420
9:20 Please correct me if I've misunderstood but I thought this word was geworfenheit?
Didint he say in his other Heidigger lecture that the feeling of being unwillingly in the world is "Geworfenheit"= to be thrown, intead of "Empfindlichkeit"= sensitivity?
Moral heroism in the face of moral chaos
Playing tennis with the net down
Did Dr. Sugrue do a talk about Camus, or Gabriel Marcel? Seems like I used to be able to search a specific channel but not anymore. I think Marcel chose hope vs despair unlike Sartre.
R.I.P professor