F 22 Raptor VS F 35 Lightning II - 5th Generation Fighter Jet Comparison

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2022
  • F-22 and F-35 are the most ambitious fighter programs in the Western world to have produced aircraft ready for combat, although the F-35 is currently restricted to a limited initial operating capability and is not yet ready for medium or high intensity engagements.
    The F-22 uses a much higher end more costly airframe, but has suffered from a difficulty incorporating upgrades and very high maintenance issues which along with its low production run mean it is likely to be retired from service decades ahead of the lower maintenance but more modern F-35 or even the old F-15. The F-22 and F-35 are set to continue to define the fifth generation for many years to come.
    #outofyourmind
    #O2YM
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 516

  • @maxwellalexander9996
    @maxwellalexander9996 ปีที่แล้ว +721

    The way this bot said 35 was so annoying.

  • @taylort8674
    @taylort8674 ปีที่แล้ว +213

    Yep. Gotta love the F-third-of-five.
    Best 3 out of 5, right?

    • @MikeM275
      @MikeM275 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      LOL

    • @pcmmemories
      @pcmmemories ปีที่แล้ว +8

      AI will ruin everything

    • @cankzilla
      @cankzilla ปีที่แล้ว +5

      F-third-of-five! Love this video for all the facts but this is hilarious!!

    • @keirfarnum6811
      @keirfarnum6811 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I prefer “Eff Seven of Nine.”

    • @ntt2k
      @ntt2k ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ohhh.. so, not F Certify

  • @SkydivingSquid
    @SkydivingSquid ปีที่แล้ว +221

    What is crazy to realize is that the F-22 was built and designed in the 1970s and 1980s.. back when almost everything publicly speaking, was analog and in kbits... yet the F-22 has technology integrated into it that far exceeds anything on the public market today and can still out-perform any other bird in the air.. keeping in mind the exponential technology curve.. what has the US Government designed and developed in the last 30-40 years? The F-22 is a 5-gen fighter from almost 40 years ago.. I imagine the US Government has generations and generations of designs and aircraft that have yet to be declassified that will 'roll out' down the line, as out adversaries 'catch up' (LOL). . . My hot take is that 'UFOs' that seemingly break the laws of physics (from an observers standpoint) are simply glimpses of what the US Government has.

    • @chrisgmelch1479
      @chrisgmelch1479 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      the F-15A/B was designed and built in the 70s. First delivered in 1976 with the C/D models arriving in '79. F-22 was still a ways off yet. First "Stealth" attempt, code named "Have Blue" was the F-117. Not actually an "F" fighter but an "A" attack aircraft. Soft landings

    • @jonathanschaper1650
      @jonathanschaper1650 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      I am with you. No telling what we have today.

    • @ghz24
      @ghz24 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      The design criteria wasn't even released until 1985.
      Zero design work on smooth stealth aircraft was done on the 70's. In the 70's we were still struggling to create the have blue/hopeless diamond (f-117).
      It was secret for about half a decade so the whole "they have operational aircraft decades ahead of anything we know" is just BS.
      They can't expect the companies that designed and manufacture the plane to make a great plane and then tell them yes we want 50 of them but hold that thought for a decade or two. Don't throw away the molds or fire any of the people, just tread water for a few years.
      The problem with super secret airplanes is using them kills the whole secret part.

    • @forlorndream1400
      @forlorndream1400 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Most military hardware and especially planes are built these days using a modular design. This means systems can be easily upgraded as improvements come along, similar to upgrading the RAM or GPU on your PC. The plane itself my be decades old since conception but I very much doubt the systems are more than a few years old if that.

    • @johnphillipcorciega297
      @johnphillipcorciega297 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      There's a reason why the US prohibits the sale of F-22 up to this date but on the other hand they made F-35 available for the allies. 😎 A 40 year old 5th gen fighter still way much superior to the F-35 which is a crazy fact.

  • @Indarow
    @Indarow ปีที่แล้ว +124

    F-thurtafaiv
    Beautiful. I’m totally calling it that from now on.

    • @mrspaceman2764
      @mrspaceman2764 ปีที่แล้ว

      I scrolled down to say the same thing.

    • @swank3309
      @swank3309 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lmfaoooooo I was like what did I just hear that correctly

    • @stanleymasterson1135
      @stanleymasterson1135 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hate these computer voices

    • @magnum427
      @magnum427 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@stanleymasterson1135 I wondered if it was a computer when I heard the voice. Thx for confirming.

    • @Swarley218
      @Swarley218 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      God damnit, I couldn't even watch the whole thing because of this comment 🤣

  • @DuaLeaD
    @DuaLeaD 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +61

    Along with the F-80, F-104, F-4, F-14, and F-15 before it, I believe the F-22 will go down as one of the most beautiful iconic fighter jets America ever built.

    • @mikeyplayz8438
      @mikeyplayz8438 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      The F-16 is more iconic than the F-15 imo

    • @dreaminknight
      @dreaminknight 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Beautiful? Nah. Deadly? Yes.

    • @operation2096
      @operation2096 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      F22 is king

    • @tommyers477
      @tommyers477 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The f-104? Really? Am I missing something, or was the Starfighter a death trap?

    • @arthurmuniz506
      @arthurmuniz506 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      absolutely possible that it will go down in history as THE most iconic fighter jet EVER...

  • @boddaboom77
    @boddaboom77 ปีที่แล้ว +119

    F35 has come into its own after years and years of WTF from the Pentagon, but I still think the F22 is the absolute pinnacle of aeronautics. It just doesn't get much better.

    • @DerJuvens
      @DerJuvens ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Oh it will become much better. Now we will apply AI and get even crazier results. We are far from the plateau :P

    • @VunnyGuy
      @VunnyGuy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Wait till you hear about the yf-23, pretty much only lost to the f-22 because of cost

    • @Ripa-Moramee
      @Ripa-Moramee 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ​@@DerJuvensMy man, we have been using AI and scripted programs for everything for ages. It's nothing new.

    • @Lolzy3014
      @Lolzy3014 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ngad:

    • @farrah9748
      @farrah9748 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      * the f22 raptor gets the job done. I have yet to hear a persuading argument otherwise * 🐶

  • @christopheranderson2158
    @christopheranderson2158 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Hearing the F-35 described as “low cost” caused me to shoot soda from my nose. 🤯

    • @OutOfYourMind
      @OutOfYourMind  ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol

    • @justalpha9138
      @justalpha9138 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It's cost per unit has actually gone down quite a bit since it's inception.

    • @miguelcepeda4657
      @miguelcepeda4657 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂 Its low cost cuz it be the tax dollars 🥴

  • @2Glock30s
    @2Glock30s ปีที่แล้ว +51

    The F-22 is so beautiful!

    • @semmetje
      @semmetje ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I love the look of the f35!

    • @justalpha9138
      @justalpha9138 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@semmetje Me too. It's the aircraft I would want to fly if I join the Air Force.

  • @Ares_0926
    @Ares_0926 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I flew the F-35 simulator ( with assist by a Navy Lieutenant) when the F-35 was still in development. It was absolutely amazing. I even was able to land on a carrier.

  • @cb6276
    @cb6276 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    how he says "thirtuhfive" is like nails on a chalkboard

    • @user-ts8ep6mq7x
      @user-ts8ep6mq7x หลายเดือนก่อน

      ITS SORRY

    • @BakedAtheist
      @BakedAtheist หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s AI content dude. Lame af

  • @dreaminknight
    @dreaminknight 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    I recently listened to interview with an active F-22 pilot, who also has some experience with the F-35. To the question, which jet he would choose in any A2A situation, he said clearly the F-22....
    I think this guy with real life experience has good reasons to choose the F-22 over the F-35 in any A2A engagements..

    • @Orbital_Inclination
      @Orbital_Inclination 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Now ask him what he'd prefer in any non-A2A roles. The F-22 is great, but only at one role.

  • @tommygun83
    @tommygun83 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    Best of both worlds. One is a tactical air to air combat masterpiece with superior manoeuvrability and speed, and the other is a long range VTOL tactical stealth bomber with state of the art technology. One will chase you down and shoot you out of the sky with pinpoint precision, and the other will have already fired the missile that blew you out of the sky before you even knew it was there. You don't have to be fast or have superior range when your wearing an invisibility cloak...

    • @mikesmith-wk7vy
      @mikesmith-wk7vy ปีที่แล้ว +5

      the f22 is even more stealthy though and even holds more missiles internally , the f35 does almost nothing better except ground strike and data links . the vtol thing destroyed the design and should have been done in a different model

  • @bobsymonds208
    @bobsymonds208 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    that has to be the best feeling, flying either of those amazing beasts. Love em both.

  • @mikesmith-wk7vy
    @mikesmith-wk7vy ปีที่แล้ว +14

    there is a reason we use the f22 as homeland defense and as a show of force to North Korea and Russia . the f22 is the beast , the f35 has a purpose, kind of but the f22 rules air to air combat

    • @moralfag9454
      @moralfag9454 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Концепция F-22 была удачнее как минимум потому, что все противники США делают аналоги не F-35, а Раптора. Su-57, J-20.

  • @drakeliampaulino9528
    @drakeliampaulino9528 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    F-22 is a queen of the fighting skies.

    • @rbrtck
      @rbrtck ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@craig4867 Much depends on what adversaries are available. Which of the two would win in a one-on-one fight against each other, starting 200 miles apart?

    • @invoker123
      @invoker123 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      F22 hands down .

    • @The_Hulkster
      @The_Hulkster ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You simply cannot beat the F22A Raptor.

    • @Chris_at_Home
      @Chris_at_Home ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I see them quite a bit. I also see the same snow covered mountains when they showed the F-22s at JBER. We live about 20 miles off their N-S runway. Many times they launch in groups of 2-3 at a time. There are over 30 of them stationed there.

  • @anubhavkumarsonowal2936
    @anubhavkumarsonowal2936 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    the f22 is way better than the fthurtufive

  • @thekansasjayhawk3504
    @thekansasjayhawk3504 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    The only fighter that can go head to head with an F22 is an F22.

    • @TheCloneX2
      @TheCloneX2 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You do realise the Typhoon has an impressive kill rate against the F22 in training? Its known outside of youtube and fanboys as the only fighter that can realistically take on F22 if it all kicks off.

    • @gunner-qf9eh
      @gunner-qf9eh 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@TheCloneX2 Keep going.............you are only telling part of the story. There were some "Specific" things that the F-22 wasn't allowed to do in these "Training Engagements"

  • @Naessey
    @Naessey ปีที่แล้ว +22

    I think it’s unfair to compare them. F-35 is all-round aircraft that is cheaper to fly, and can be used in multiple roles. The F-22 is the aircraft you don’t want to come across in aerial battle. Regardless, the fact is, the US has these incredible aircraft, which is a testament to their incredible designers.

    • @Ripa-Moramee
      @Ripa-Moramee 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You'll eat a missile before you even pick it up on radar lol...

    • @ifly-fsx
      @ifly-fsx 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You've just compared them.

    • @ikmal017
      @ikmal017 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Russia's SAM it's only weakness

  • @maxsterling290
    @maxsterling290 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I would say there is no real versus, since they don't compete but assist each other. F22/F35 relationship is kinda F15/F16 relationship, the former is air superior strategic fighter while the latter is multirole tactical fighter.

    • @OutOfYourMind
      @OutOfYourMind  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes. We are OK with that. It really complements each other

  • @KhayamGondal
    @KhayamGondal ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Just ordered a couple F 35s.

  • @pb68slab18
    @pb68slab18 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I want 2 engines! Redundancy is a beautiful thing! Especially when 1 engine goes out!

  • @anthonybenash3457
    @anthonybenash3457 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The F-thurdafive must be a secret aircraft that I am unaware of.

  • @nancyplew8258
    @nancyplew8258 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    F-22 Raptor has always been my favorite. ❤️❤️❤️🤘👏❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥

    • @farrah9748
      @farrah9748 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🌸 thank you. it has stood the test of time, my humble opinion 🌸

    • @MilitaryTalkGuy
      @MilitaryTalkGuy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      just watching an F22 fly here in the states is thrilling. Such as amazing aircraft!

  • @speedracer2336
    @speedracer2336 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    F35 is more suited for Navy and Marine missions. F22 is more for air superiority which the AF as the primary DOD air element is charged to do. Both are great airframes!

  • @firstlast9813
    @firstlast9813 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    F22 is designed to protect airspace by enforcing air superiority. F35 is designed to be a bench player that uses floor time to occupy the enemy when the home team has an advantage.
    When the allies can protect themselves, you can spend more money on developing new weapon systems.
    Update: There are so many updates to the F-35 that the new weapons make it decent against anything else. Even though it's slower than almost every other fighter, the mesh-network alongside stealth that there is almost no nation that can compete beyond visual range (assuming there are no advanced dection systems nearby. China made a new sensor that can detect the heat trail of a jet at almost any altitude so that's scary.

    • @nathanc30
      @nathanc30 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      the f16 outfights the f35, and still does the SEAD mission better than any aircraft in the US arsenal. f35 is good but not when you take in the f15 ex, and f16 viper.

    • @nathanc30
      @nathanc30 ปีที่แล้ว

      f22 program makes sense though

    • @braticuss
      @braticuss ปีที่แล้ว +14

      ​@@nathanc30 Depends how you define 'ourfights'. The F35 would take out the f16 before the f16 sees it.

    • @rbrtck
      @rbrtck ปีที่แล้ว +6

      ​@@nathanc30 The F-35 is a VLO stealth fighter with advanced sensors and sensor fusion, so I don't see why it couldn't perform the SEAD/DEAD role at least as well as the F-16. Why is the F-16 so good at it? Probably in part because of its relatively small frontal RCS, but the F-35 beats it easily in this respect.
      As for air-to-air combat, the F-35 wasn't really designed for that, but except for its limited internal capacity for air-to-air missiles (4xAIM-120D), it is capable of dominating in the air superiority role because it possesses the most critical capabilities that the F-22 uses to dominate. The F-22 is the more complete air superiority/dominance/supremacy fighter, no question, but the F-35 can also dominate over everything else.
      In a close-in dogfight, the F-16 has some advantages over the F-35 in terms of power and agility, and mainly the fact that it carries 2xAIM-9X HOBS missiles. The F-35 has two rails for this missile, but they are external, and therefore can't be used while in stealth mode. However, the F-35 still gets first look, first shot, and probably first kill. Its pilot can set up for the advantage even if it comes down to a WVR fight, and that will most likely get him the win.

    • @rbrtck
      @rbrtck ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@braticuss Or the F-15EX, for that matter. However, much depends on the rules of engagement. The F-35's advantage in situational awareness still makes it more than a match for any 4th-generation fighter overall, although it loses much (not all) of its advantage if BVR shots are not allowed.

  • @amaree9732
    @amaree9732 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I was so impressed with the F-35, I bought one for each one of my kids for Christmas.

  • @tamboensastra9747
    @tamboensastra9747 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Both of them built for diffrent pupose, f22 for full air combat control, f35 for air and land, supporting for ground battle too

  • @aviation-action
    @aviation-action 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very professional! Well done. Amazing channel -- just sub'd!

  • @airshowguy916
    @airshowguy916 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for sharing this video. :)

  • @EagleFighterJet
    @EagleFighterJet 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    F35 has come into its own after years and years of WTF from the Pentagon, but I still think the F22 is the absolute pinnacle of aeronautics.

  • @tonton6969
    @tonton6969 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Both are gorgeous

  • @deaftodd
    @deaftodd ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I won't be surprised if those fighter jets will phase out soon. Drones and missiles will take over those next-generation programs because of better maneuverability and speed.

    • @OutOfYourMind
      @OutOfYourMind  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes. It could be. But not as simple as that. Many technologies was developed so long years ago

    • @boddaboom77
      @boddaboom77 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's possible, but unlikely. A lot of missiles need an airframe to launch from or it loses range from having to burn so much fuel to get aloft. The electronics packages on the F35 are invaluable now as well. We see what has happened with Russia not being able to secure the skies over the battle space and they're getting bloodied pretty good by a much smaller force. Air defense from both sides has made it nearly impossible to do anything other than launch a few rockets or cruise missiles from way behind the front and hope they get through the missile defenses of the opponent. EW and stealth tech possessed by the US would have a better go of it, but there would undoubtedly still be losses. That's the biggest downside from a western POV. These aircraft are just so expensive that it would take some serious calculations to decide to put them at serious risk to fly missions over the battle space.

    • @reductio1000
      @reductio1000 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      true, the cost of selecting, training a pilot and keeping him up to the requiered level is insane. (extra cost 1) + even when he succeeds as a pilot, he is still a human being : needing food, water, rest and accomodation. You have to design the jet to fit him ( extra cost2 ) and his biological needs + you need a base to house this pilot. (extra cost 3) If you can eliminate these three extra costs, any organisation WILL do that, multiplying their fighter jet capabilty times (three, five, ten or even more ?) The huzaars were a dominant factor once, now hardly anyone still knows about them...obsolete. innovation. It happens.

  • @thetruebatman4632
    @thetruebatman4632 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I somehow ended up in a circle of friends with several individuals that work on the 35’s here in Fort Worth, TX. All of them are so proud of their “baby”, the F-35 and say it’s unstoppable…
    Unless there’s an F-22 on the field. Then they’re essentially badass betas waiting for direction from their alpha.

    • @AK-ky3ou
      @AK-ky3ou 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The f35 would absolutely spank the shet out of the great f22. None of these red flag wvr dogfights mean a thing in 5th gen combat. The f35 will detect and have 2 amraam’s on the way to the f22 before it realized wtf was happening.

    • @Randy-lg1qo
      @Randy-lg1qo 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@AK-ky3ou I highly doubt that. It’s upgradability, much lower service cost and overall price is it’s drawcard that will see much higher numbers of it, more airtime and longer service life tho - so a more useful aircraft in the real world

  • @reductio1000
    @reductio1000 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The cost of selecting, training a pilot and keeping him up to the requiered level is insane!! (extra HUGE cost 1) + even when he succeeds as a pilot, he is still a human being : needing food, water, rest and accomodation. Not even mentioning salary, pension or other benefits...+ You have to design the jet to fit him, keep his body alive , so as he can survive it as best as possible even with ejection capability when all goes wrong( extra HUGE cost2 ) + you need a base to house this pilot +possible family (extra HUGE cost 3). If you can eliminate these three HUGE costs, any organisation WILL do that !!!!! Multiplying their fighter jet capabilty times (three, five, ten or even more ?) obsolete. innovation. It happens.

  • @actualRocketScientist
    @actualRocketScientist 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I know the f-35 is the future but I absolutely love for the F-22. Such a beautiful aircraft

  • @jesseraina1614
    @jesseraina1614 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Everyone always says how much better the f22s is. For starters the f22s was developed a long time ago which in itself is amazing but makes its tech more known and its an air to air superiority fighter, with the f35 new and still being modified and tested even though some are being tested its far from being done development. And the f35 is a multi role stealth bomber, interceptor, fighter, missile defense, air to ground, electronic warfare, tactical nuclear weapons, short take off and landing, or vtol or conventional take off and landing, also it can be modifed from a 5th gen stealth strike aircraft and used in the begging of a war and once air superiority is won then it can be turned in to a 4th gen style aircraft using its hardpoints increasing its weapon load a hell of alot. Let alone the f35 was specifically built to fit all roles and to be operated and be easy to share real time tactical information to each f35 operated by different allies including updates problems so on. And last the f35 is highly classified where the f22 still is but has been used so much theres alot of information about it. But due to any multi role aircraft its not gonna be the beat the best of best in the best of the bests specific type of fighting. But it being a 5th gen multi role stealth bomber fighter its on par with most 4th gen aircrafts weather fighters strategic bombers interceptors electronic warfare missile defense so on. Its the master aircraft but master of none.

    • @Ripa-Moramee
      @Ripa-Moramee 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It probably is the master of something, if not certainly the master of multi-role aircraft.
      Also the f-22 is a lot better in terms of air superiority, that's probably what most people mean when they say it's better. What I don't get is this guy said it has 4th gen stealth 🤦‍♂️ it's literally one of the most stealthy/is the most stealthy fighter in the world. It literally has an RCS of about the size of a bee...

    • @rugerred8659
      @rugerred8659 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You’re actually uninformed the f-22 is a 5th gen fighter and it has more capabilities than the f-35. You can google this the US has never given any Allie’s of ours the f-22 blueprint and nobody but us has flown it but we have given our Allie’a the f-35 to fly so that speaks volumes nobody but the US actually knows the f-22 real power

  • @michaeltrent2726
    @michaeltrent2726 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Always love listening to someone who knows nothing on a subject try to sound authoritative

    • @OutOfYourMind
      @OutOfYourMind  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, you are right, me too

  • @gameratwork2143
    @gameratwork2143 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    So the F22 is to be designed to be the superior combat plane vs anything in the sky, take down anything that it sees, and the 35 is to be designed to be good at everything but be amazing at nothing, more cost effective and versatile. Got it thanks. 👍

    • @dumdumbinks274
      @dumdumbinks274 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The F-35 is designed to excel at air to ground roles such as Strike or Interdiction.

  • @differentfins
    @differentfins 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video. I could watch it "thurdafive" times 😂

  • @The_Military_Aviator
    @The_Military_Aviator ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is like comparing apple and oranges, they are built for different things, the F-22 is an Air Superiority fighter while the F-35 is a Strike Fighter.

  • @tomhunts3964
    @tomhunts3964 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Does the F-Third of Five have the same tech as Seven of Nine

  • @John_Doe657
    @John_Doe657 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Well logic tells me there’s a reason the U.S hasn’t made the F-22 available for export. Some things are best kept a secret.

  • @Fosi94
    @Fosi94 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    F22 by a mile. It's the pinnacle of badassery

  • @arekay21
    @arekay21 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    man this computer generated voice made this video hard to watch... emphasizing incorrect parts of sentences, mispronouncing, and the flow was just way off... blah

  • @nick-un9pk
    @nick-un9pk ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What is cumbat?

  • @bridgetr7166
    @bridgetr7166 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They are all incredible. However, I will always favour the F-22 she is a stunning beast.

  • @richardgibsonsr.8812
    @richardgibsonsr.8812 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Can’t stand listening to the synthesized voice. The cadence is so messed up its distracting.

  • @joshuazwart3098
    @joshuazwart3098 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    What’s a f third a fi?

  • @mra8794
    @mra8794 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I still believe the YF-23 was better!

  • @andrewbellinger6120
    @andrewbellinger6120 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The F22 was designed in the 19 hundred eighties

  • @SeanHorton-ky6ds
    @SeanHorton-ky6ds 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    You hold on there quick, Remember the A-10 Wart Hog...

  • @RosalindaBakingShowFanClub
    @RosalindaBakingShowFanClub 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Who heard "eff therta fide" more than you ever did before in your life, not to mention nineteen hundred eighties. LOL

  • @nicop195
    @nicop195 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    F 22 is great better stealth and maneuverability, but the F 35 is much more technologically advanced

  • @franciscocabete1238
    @franciscocabete1238 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    BOTH Fighters Aircraft Was a great Failures 😮😮
    The Best one FIGHTER AIRCRAFT until now 💪 it's the F-15 Eagle 🦅 following the F-18 Super Hornet and the last one and the legendary F-16 Falcon Demo until now 💪🪽🪽🪽🪽 still 's the One Best Fighters Aircraft 😊😊😊😊

  • @dwightwordlaw5170
    @dwightwordlaw5170 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    lol F thurda 5.

  • @cwatson42785
    @cwatson42785 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Take it from me who is lucky to own both, i much prefer my f22 to go cruise with. My f35 just isn't the same. Both great in their own ways but my raptor just has a special place in my heart! I thought when i sold my f15 to upgrade to the 35 id regret it but nope its definitely more fun to fly than the f15

  • @twanto
    @twanto ปีที่แล้ว +1

    what is an F-thirdafied?

  • @BigTankDriver101
    @BigTankDriver101 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Also check out F-150 Lightning, capable to operate at ground level without any wings and tow stuff

  • @justinealyap763
    @justinealyap763 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    nice 👍

  • @nasrudding7481
    @nasrudding7481 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    F-22 & f-35 are the best now

  • @jeremypedersen9195
    @jeremypedersen9195 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is a "thirtifie"?

  • @johnhunt1805
    @johnhunt1805 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The F-35 has a flaw in its tail design meaning it can only be supersonic for 2 minutes and 30 seconds per sortie. Otherwise the tail literally gets ripped off by the stress. The flaw is considered too expensive to fix, and the F-35s role has been redesigned to be sub-sonic. Most expensive weapons system in world history.

  • @pashapasovski5860
    @pashapasovski5860 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    2 F22s for the first time fired in anger, using 2 missiles to destroy Chinese weather baloon ,over Atlantic Ocean! That's what I call Bang for a Buck!

    • @MilitaryTalkGuy
      @MilitaryTalkGuy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      cant hold that against the F22... all other countries are still afraid to send a jet up against them because they know they will be toast. Yes, the F22 is an air superiority fighter. Now our government wasting the money to use expensive missiles on a balloon... that is another story but not the fault of the F22. Great jet!

  • @vpmedia4856
    @vpmedia4856 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    When can we see the 4th of 5?

  • @my_dear_friend_
    @my_dear_friend_ 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How can a jet with vertical take off capability have a thrust to weight ratio of less than 1?

    • @MilitaryTalkGuy
      @MilitaryTalkGuy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you can have vertical takeoff, you can have full fuel and you can have full weapons loadout... just not at the same time. It is all from that terrible engine that never has met specs promised and is full of problems.

  • @AK-ky3ou
    @AK-ky3ou 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Everyone here thinking the f22 is king of the skies doesn’t understand how air superiority works. The f22 is an incredible fighter and was king of the skies before the f35. The f22 would surely beat an f35 in a wvr dogfight. Thing is, the f35 will detect the f22 and kill it before the f22 has a chance to get wvr. Anyone thinking otherwise must think the p51 mustang is still the most capable fighter.

  • @larrywallace2881
    @larrywallace2881 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You get what you pay for > He has already told you all you need to know> F-35 is cheaper

  • @AdmiringOceanSunset-sy7ys
    @AdmiringOceanSunset-sy7ys หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Spec's terminology! F-35 stealth, Minnie gun / f-22 evade!!! ( Comparison )

  • @user-px8lx9dp6h
    @user-px8lx9dp6h 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just 🤔 about it... .. . An actual Lightning ⚡ vs. A prehistoric Raptor dinosaur,,, I'm choosing the F-35 because it's capable of combat anywhere!!!😅

  • @marishkagranada7985
    @marishkagranada7985 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    F35's belly's surface looks so alien... I like it better than F22's

    • @Crusader7.6
      @Crusader7.6 ปีที่แล้ว

      F22 is more powerful than F35.

    • @Yeager123123
      @Yeager123123 ปีที่แล้ว

      I really like both of them for different reasons. Still, the f-22 is better looking imo

  • @delmccormack7001
    @delmccormack7001 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    B 117, B 2, f 22, f 35 and the Warthog let me sleep soundly at night. That is the blank slate package. Think of the f 35 more like a manned satellite with weapons. All sensors connected like internet hubs. A flying, thinking constellation of stealth aircraft collectively linked like Borg.

  • @markgerard5585
    @markgerard5585 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The 🇺🇸 is STILL the only country with TRUE 5th gen fighter planes.

  • @TayyarePilotuOfficial
    @TayyarePilotuOfficial 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Basic answer is F-35. Just because it's more stealth and have more sophisticated radar system generally

  • @user-lf3hh3lx1l
    @user-lf3hh3lx1l 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I agree

  • @hectorev9978
    @hectorev9978 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Just base on solely on name the Raptor sounds way better 😅

  • @brandonhoffman4712
    @brandonhoffman4712 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Can we breed these two? Ill buy one if its in my range!
    This one pulls @ my heart strings. I will never not be in love with thrust vectoring! But i respect stealth enough to realize internal armaments are a must.

  • @kingrama2727
    @kingrama2727 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I was an F-35 pilot for 10 years and an F-22 pilot for 8. They’re both the best at what they were designed to do. Russia and China have nothing that can touch the F-22. i will say wait until you see what America has in the pipeline though…

  • @opgam3r482
    @opgam3r482 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The F-35 C is not the first VTOL... The Marines have the "worst" of this platform now, and had the limited but versatile "Harrier" b4 this platform was introduced, w/ the Air Force, & Navy having F-35 B and F-35 A respectively I think...

  • @buckerdoeoutdoors
    @buckerdoeoutdoors ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The ol Thurda 5

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Realy I like this powerful fighters jets

  • @user-fz6ib1wq9i
    @user-fz6ib1wq9i ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good

  • @Stevonoles1
    @Stevonoles1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Like comparing a F16 to a F15.

    • @OutOfYourMind
      @OutOfYourMind  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ok. The video on progress. Will be released early March

  • @PeterBenson-nc7xf
    @PeterBenson-nc7xf 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Leon we need to make first contactAmberly seems to be perfect need radio signals to attract and unarmed planes to contact. Need approvals ASAP

  • @noiztrauma
    @noiztrauma ปีที่แล้ว

    Wait, so is the F-22 4th or 5th generation? I believe i heard him say it's 4th gen?

  • @miscponderations1014
    @miscponderations1014 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I question the validity of replacing the F-35 with conventional fighter aircraft.
    The F-35 is replacing the aging but by no means, obsolete Harrier Jump Jet.
    I haven't seen a F-35 up close but if I did, I suspect that there's no flaps on it. Just vector nozzles.
    Just like the Harrier.

  • @familyretrogaming1035
    @familyretrogaming1035 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What's, " Thirta five"?

  • @nodafy
    @nodafy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The F-22 would destroy you in a dogfight
    The F-35 would destroy you before you can even say dogfight

  • @mikesmith-wk7vy
    @mikesmith-wk7vy ปีที่แล้ว +1

    they were built to complement each other it was very stupid to cancel the f22. this was a good video . most like it are just f35 fan vids that lie and say the f35 is better at both roles because they buy the stupidity that the dogfight is dead. And he even mentioned that even today almost 15 years later the f35 still isn't even full combat ready yet

    • @justalpha9138
      @justalpha9138 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Dogfighting is EXTREMELY rare nowadays. Even former fighter pilots say that dogfighting is a rare event, so why heavily focus on something that only has a small chance of happening? The F-35 is a phenomenal aircraft.

    • @mikesmith-wk7vy
      @mikesmith-wk7vy ปีที่แล้ว

      @@justalpha9138 because that’s what a fighter is for , shooting down enemy planes . You can have a fighter that is good bvr and dogfighting like the f22 and newer f16s but it’s not going to be a bomber and work for every branch. Having complementary heavy fighters to go with the light fighters makes more sense than one that does nothing well the f22 was supposed to complement the f35

    • @justalpha9138
      @justalpha9138 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mikesmith-wk7vy Which it does. The F-35 is an absolute beast of an aircraft with incredible versatility and capability depending on what sort of mission you're going for.

    • @justalpha9138
      @justalpha9138 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mikesmith-wk7vy Fighters aren't just limited to CAP, certain airframes are capable of great air to ground support. The Desert Storm campaign was an example of fighters doing a mix of both.

  • @spiritmonarch
    @spiritmonarch ปีที่แล้ว +2

    All I can hear is this guy saying "F Thirtuh Five." Is he incapable of pronouncing "Thirty" properly, or is that a choice? Great video, thanks for your work.

    • @joshmccrillis9950
      @joshmccrillis9950 ปีที่แล้ว

      I feel like it’s just a really good AI voice. I have no idea though, such a weird way to say that and every single time.

  • @DrHogfan
    @DrHogfan 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If the US were to go to war tomorrow are there any fighters (eg. F14 , F15 16 f4's even) that could not be used in combat?

  • @SeanHorton-ky6ds
    @SeanHorton-ky6ds 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The thirty five is a multi roll.

  • @nedmann1
    @nedmann1 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Scrap, that's why they are no longer produced...

  • @FirstLast-nk3gr
    @FirstLast-nk3gr 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Very guut

  • @Vispear
    @Vispear ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Как человек из России спрошу у автора, а смысл сравнивать 2 истребителя которые предназначаются для разных целей. F-35 - Истребитель-бомбардировщик то есть его основная работа направлена на поддержку сухопутных войск, F-22 - Многоцелевой, но он скорее предназначен для господства в воздухе

    • @dmitryflanker5423
      @dmitryflanker5423 ปีที่แล้ว

      F-22 создавался, как самолет для прорыва ПВО, ПРО РФ и Стран ВД. Так-же на нем обкатали передовые технологии, большинство из которых удешевлялось, улучшалось и перекочевало на F-35. Скорость таки играет роль, а вот двигатели c ОВТ не дают преимущества перед AIM-9X. Плюс интеграция в авионику целеуказания из различных источников т.н. АСБУ. Кобры, чакры, петли, бочки пусть русские пилоты оставят для авиашоу. Над территорией РФ его предупредят по радиостанции с земли. И то в случае работы А-50. На удалении 300 км от границы РФ и самолета ДРЛО шансов у ФАК-ПА нет...... Встречную ракету засечь сможет он поздно, с любого, другого курса он ее вообще не обнаружит.
      Не туда развивались в РФ. Большее количество союзников, унификация вооружения и интеграция в АСУВ сейчас рулят + технологии. Россия пошла диаметрально противоположным путем. Вслед за Северной Кореей.

  • @smokedem7947
    @smokedem7947 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Personally still love the F-22 the F-35 looks cool but its only comparable to a f/a18 because of its single engine cool looking jet but not top tier

    • @nathanc30
      @nathanc30 ปีที่แล้ว

      f18 is okay. f16 does what it does for cheaper

  • @SWog617
    @SWog617 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    F thirta-five?

    • @yujinhikita5611
      @yujinhikita5611 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      think it might be bot voice i really cant cant tell anymore tho they are becoming too good

  • @kevincheney6628
    @kevincheney6628 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    F15s and F16s are the new B52s

  • @naifalsaeedan5413
    @naifalsaeedan5413 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I always said F22. Is the American armor Legacy

  • @justinhamill7505
    @justinhamill7505 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video with lots of information but for me just couldn't get past the continuous mispronunciation of the word "thirda five"

  • @Darkasknightfall
    @Darkasknightfall ปีที่แล้ว

    I see F-35’s in the video but not one 3rd of five aircraft was shown even though the bot kept mentioning it. 🤔