ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 พ.ค. 2019
- Landeskog offside controversy 7:01
Meier hand pass controversy 10:43
Steve Dangle shares his picks for worst plays of the week in the NHL. What is Justin Williams doing? Was Landeskog actually offside? How did the refs miss a blatant hand pass in overtime?
----------------------------------------------
Subscribe to Sportsnet on TH-cam - sprtsnt.ca/2paAT2L
Visit Sportsnet.ca for more sports news and highlights - www.sportsnet.ca
Follow Sportsnet on Facebook - sprtsnt.ca/YTFB
Follow Sportsnet on Twitter - sprtsnt.ca/YTTWTR
Follow Sportsnet on Instagram - sprtsnt.ca/YTINST
Follow Sportsnet on Snapchat - sprtsnt.ca/YTSNAP
Watch Sportsnet on Sportsnet Now - sportsnet.ca/now - กีฬา
7:27 why do I find myself laughing so hard
Brownboi31 It’s funnier when you get to see Drew die inside in person. Also they got farther than the Leafs.
SteveDangle bruh I cant believe you just replied 😂
Brownboi31 9:39 too
SteveDangle It's funnier when you get to see "The Pro-Drew-cer"(TM) die in person
Welcome to the NHL, where you can review a play from 8 minutes ago for being offside but not a series changing goal in OT.
Are you talking about landeskog being "offside"
@@zezoworld1330 no just in general for offside. Like Steve said, they care about getting the right call...sometimes.
Handpasses have to have a closed hand. Review it again lil guy.
@@domthompson3535 I don't know who told you that, but they lied to you bud.
Dom Thompson lol no they don’t
NBA/NFL: we have the worst refs no question
NHL: hold my beer real quick
nah NFL is still the worst easily because the league still doesnt know which penalties it wants to enforce and also which rules to make up on the fly
@@gearsofMEAT Sure they do. If it has anything to do with NE Pats, it mustn't be a penalty! If the opponent stares sideways at Brady, it must be roughing the passer!
since it’s from toronto: hold my brew eh
MLB Umpires: Am I a joke to you?
Why are they hiring NFL officials for the NHL
Because legalized gambling requires more and more rigged games.
Diss Info Finally someone said it. I want to know why vegas gets pro teams. The gambling capitol of the USA. In all these play off games the calls seem so weak. So hey, lets bring gambling into the mix. Now were legit! Really wise!
@@rollinrat4850 The Raiders would move to Hell, if Satan built them a stadium.
I'm pretty sure those were the same refs for the saints rams playoff game.
NHL refs have been a joke this entire playoffs, I’ve been watching hockey for 11 years and this is one of the worst officiating times of hockey I’ve ever seen. Like good god, how bad can you possibly be this bad? It’s unfortunate that some great hockey has been utterly and completely ruined by horrific officiating and lack of understanding the rules of the sport.
Says the pens fan
Eye-rolling, head-shaking Knights fan. I believe the sharks are fellating the ref before the game.
@Yeet Miester I must agree with you and the young Pen's fan. Everyone who has been watching these playoffs should give the officiating a low grade. No matter what team or teams you love or hate. There have been obvious major blunders, but then there's all the little stuff that's called or missed. A player barely taps the stick, and the opponent drops it, resulting in a minor for slashing. Those are both funny and ridiculous! Early in the playoffs Chara got crushed from behind and no call, but plenty of those are often called. I guess size matters. Jake DeBrusk was called for a slash on McGinn because he literally skated next to him. There was nothing there! Now one for our side. My little buddy, Torey Krug was into it a bit with Justin Williams, so Krug basically offered his own stick to Williams and the Captain took it, resulting in a minor penalty, perhaps for holding the stick. Lol Ridiculous.
I think "America's Funniest Video's" is tuning in to the NHL playoffs now, for a chance to boost their content. Someone send them the Shark's Videos. : ) Just kidding. It's really been awful all the way around. . .
I’ve been watching hockey for 15 years and I can attest to the referees are ass.
I've been watching since 92. It was worst ive seen
Anyone remember Karlsson yelling at Matt Duchene? "Don't touch that!"
Lost Cause yeah!
Only 4 people in the arena couldn't see the hand pass. Also only 4 people in the arena get paid to see stuff like that.
preeeetty sure those 4 got paid to not see things, for one side. Hence a certain coach's very confident interview where he said the 'refs will take care of us'.
@James Reilly im originally from tampa and now live about 2 hours from stl so theyre my alternate team and im bummed the first cup has an asterisk from poor officiating. I honestly think the blues would have won. But now we wont know
Wait. They called offsides on a guy who... was trying to get onto the bench? That's so stupid.
JDeppFan2272 he’s on the ice and in the O zone
@@robertfullam8898 And his replacement came on the ice when he was well into the O zone. The only way to clear the offside at that point is for him to get both skates off the ice.
Imagine trying to explain the rules to someone new to hockey not for just this game, but the whole playoffs!! "You can't do that, SOMETIMES."
If you're wearing blue gold and white it's not a penalty. If your logo looks like a toilet flushing, it is always a penalty.
I'm teaching the game to my wife, and shes just as confused as I am now XD
Why shouldn't hand passes be allowed? Because that's not hockey.
ଳଳଳ ଚଚଚ hand passes are allowed. In your own defensive zone. Not in the opponents zone. I thought it was a hand pass because of the motion to move the puck but I can see how they say it’s not because you can’t see him actually hit it, it falls to him
Cole Helms he clearly hit it with his hand in a deliberate motion. I was there and it was clear live from the nose bleeds.
@@d-f-o7233 was the missed delay of game on perron clear? before he scored 2 goals in the 2 minutes after that?
@@KenngoCity they're talking about the hand pass. don't be a little bitch.
Ticky tack ass rule
This post season brought the NHL to its lowest level of integrity ever?
I'm pretty sure Brett Hull's goal to end the era of calling back goals for having your toenail in the crease (it wasn't called back??!?) was worse than this year's debacles that have been detailed in the above video.
Dark Theme welllllll if you consider new replay technology and the fact that it’s 2019 and the league still hasn’t figured this out.... I think that this is an overall way more inexcusable situation.
The NHL is quickly becoming the NBA. I haven't watched one NBA game since game six of the 2002 Western Conference Finals.
* Al Eagleson ainec. Refs have been brutal though no argument there. Glad Blues are up 3-2 at least.
I don't understand those Hamilton penalties at all. Me too, Brind'Amour.
Hey Rebecca, Bruin's fan in the house, just registering my agreement. Not really sure what he did wrong there, either.
It's been horrendous in these playoffs in every series and every game. The only silver lining I can come up with,
and I know I'm really reaching here, is thank God the NHL uses only the best officials for the playoffs or this could be much worse!
Rebecca Johnson at the second one i think that referee call it ‘cause Hamilton doesn’t play the puck
Still wonder how the game would have changed if St Louis was called on the puck over glass. I guess it all balances out in the end ....
Supe063 not the same as a game/series changing goal bud
@@nathanielcava4128 ... you can't say that. What if a SJ power play scored? Different game all together then. With game/series implications.
Stl fans are raising money for the blind
Edit: thank I never had this many likes
Can confirm. This is true.
about time something positive comes out of St. Louis.
If they let hand passes be a thing but say that you can't bat it into the net with your hand, then it's the exact same scenario as the kicking thing that you were making fun of.
Welcome to the MMHL, Mickey Mouse Hockey League, where Goofy and Pluto are the officials.
Donald Veilleux this comment is gold 😂😂😂
So true!!!
Anaheim Ducks until 2005.
My question is, if the play is reviewed for a hand pass and the goal is overturned, do the Blues get the penalty for tripping Meier putting him into the position where he could no longer play the puck with his stick? It was a pretty obvious trip, but I didn't see the officials arm go up. Looked like two missed calls about a second apart.
yeah, but only one resulted in a game-deciding illegal goal
Don't forget perron delaying the game then scoring while he should have been in the box. Twice
Don't talk about the tripping/hooking at 11:06 either. Nope nothing to see
6 months later the Sharks beating St Louis with the HAND PASS still pisses me off!
I'm mad about this but I'm also mad that the idiot 27 iced the puck 3 times, and the fact that the blues couldn't score on an open net out of 10 shots.
Idk why they kept icing it...Everytime the whisle was blown WHY!
That’s our captain...
Yeet Miester I'd say give the A to Schwarz. He's been with the team just as long as vladi.
that is our illustrious team captain lol.
@Yeet Miester I don't think you want your captain to be getting 8 minutes of ice time a game. Steen deserves to be on the 4th line where he is one of the leagues best 4th liners, not on a higher line to be one of the leagues worst
Was waiting for this since last night!!
Same
But you conveniently forgot about the two power plays the Sharks were denied (one being the Delay of Game puck over the glass) that changed the entire momentum of the game. And you didn't care about the obvious non-penalty called on Joe Thornton which gave the Blues a PP and go ahead goal.
same
The Bruins and the Sharks have extra players with stripes on the ice!
Has anyone seen the interview with the NHL commissioner about this play? It was the worst response ever. Basically rambled on for 5+ minutes with no answer.
Unreal.
Kevyn
what do you ecpect him to say?
„yes, those refs were bad“
„we change the rule now“
„we fired them“
„the nhl is sorry, that refs missed a deciding call.“
@@almosTalented I expected him as the commissioner to at least humble himself and admit the obvious and maybe admit the rule about instant replay needed to be a bit more looked at, especially with the last few game changing goals that slipped through the cracks by loop holes and were absolutely horribly and wrongly called...
...Not go on a five minute tangent about absolutely nothing.
what play? there were a bunch :pl ol
So the NHL wanted the bruins and the sharks. Got it
@Betty Bluelol. Neither are my team so idc, just lots of helpful calls. Hockey is a weird sport
Matthew Baran
Better TV markets? Bettman would love that.
Yep.
Bruins hurricanes series wasnt anything special, bruins were by far the better team. Yeah there was iffy calls but that was both ways
nathan nixon Yep especially with the heavy Boston bias on NBCSN.
After last night I was just waiting for Steve's reaction...
I hate the argument that hand passes should be legal. It’s like saying you should be able to pick up the ball and throw it on in soccer.
I think it's funny that FanDuel is refunding money for bets placed on the Sharks Blues Game #handpass
I hate the sharks but I think it's fair that they one. Everyone talks about the goal in overtime that shouldn't have counted, but the blues also got away with a goal from perron when he should've been in the box for delay of game moments earlier.
@@colinf3963 then it would've been a tie game and it would've still been decided by a hand pass.
@@rockmyballsplease if perron didn't score the goal than the blues would've been down a goal and the sharks would've won in regulation
@@colinf3963 You are forgetting that the tying goal, their fourth goal was scored with an extra attacker and the goalie pulled, so it was a six on 5 situatuion. Had Perron not scored it would simply be 3-3 and the sharks would have had no need to pull for an extra attacker. Of course all this is assuming the game stayed the same .
Carolina isn't going to win this series so they might as well do us all a favor and level Marchand
preachhhhhhh 🙏
Yup yup
Yessssssssssss
@@CLIBBINSANDHAWGS People can call me an asshole if they want but If I was on the canes and the series is 3-0 and were down by more than 1 in the dying minutes of the third, Marchaund is eating every one of his teeth and probably a few of Chara's.
He is a shit disturber but you can't lie and say he doesn't have skill
"In what sport is it legal to punch someone in the back of the head" - Dangle
Maybe it's time to send a gift basket to Dan O'Halloran and say "Sorry we sent you home after an understandable mix-up over that cross-check. Any chance you could come back to work? 'Cause the other guys are way worse."
Sooo everyone wants to rewind the play and have the refs correct the missed hand pass, but then stop the tape before it catches the missed tripping call on Bouwmeester?
Why is any call non-reviewable? Isn't it the objective to call the game correctly? Wait till the Sharks get away with #3 against the Bruins and it costs the Bruins a Cup! Boy will we hear the yelling.
Against the Bruins would be #4. (VGK 5 min major called for a minor penalty, COL offsides that wasn't conclusive, STL Obvious hand pass was obvious)
It literally can not happen! Make all the crazy calls you want to. The Bruins will not lose the Stanley Cup!
It is Boston's year to win the Tri-fector. Red Sox World Series, Patriot's Super Bowl, and Bruin's Stanley Cup.
Sorry if that brings out even more haters, but the Truth shall overcome!
Anyway, the only time this has ever happened before was in 1935-36
Detroit Tigers, Detroit Lions, Detroit Red Wings all Champions.
And, to quote a great American Coach before his team's biggest game ever, "This is our time!"
They don't want reviews to slow down the game. The more the game stops for reviews the slower and longer the games take. That being said, with the technology that they have now most goals would take a couple seconds to review, most goals are not difficult to tell if they are legit. I think that at the very least in the playoffs every goal should be reviewed since most of the time the review would just take a few seconds.
@@keepingitreel...8037 just ignores the nba
Keeping it reel . . . I think u jinxed us
Listen to the announcer.." Timo Meier wrist shot blocked, goes after the loose puck, BATS IT IN FRONT" JFC
I am surprised the announcer could even say 'bats it in front' without mentioning 'hand pass, this will probably be blown dead'
I was waiting for this video the whole day.
you find this drama queen funny ?
Being a Blues fan is like being a battered wife that hopes her abusive husband will come around eventually, except you know deep down nothing will ever change. fml.
@Reel Tawk Daddy finally took care of me? I don't know.
I have found in the last year or so that the NHL has some real problems that need to be fixed.... you cannot have games being decided on illegal plays
I remember as a blues fan watching that hand pass and screaming louder than a demon from hell that it was a hand pass
"Dang it, sharks get all the breaks". Bout time in my opinion, feels good.
They been getting the most visible breaks. But even in that game there were two other "didn't see it, can't call it" items that went against the Sharks and favored the Blues- the Perron puck over the glass, and the Blais headshot on Braun. If the Perron delay of game gets called correctly, the Blues momentum is stopped and the Sharks maintain the lead and we never even get to OT.
11:12 was that weird circus/organ music supposed to cheer up the crowd?
Love this series keep it going
to answer the question "why not be able to hand pass?"...because everyone would do it and the game wouldn't be anything like it is ever again
That hand was the Sharks demise. It took 37 seconds into the first period in the next game for the Hockey Gods to even the score. After that, every bounce / carom went to the Blues. We scored off the sharks sticks etc....As far as I'm concerned, Meier doomed his team with that blatant cheat move. They were never the same team.
Tampa had a goal taken back for the same thing with Tyler Johnson jumping through the door during the regular season.
Eric Quina thank you. I just posted the link on this video.
I think its dumb, but the rule is the rule. If he had skated one more stride into the neutral zone it would have been a goal.
Eric Quina that play stuck with me. Then I saw it happen again. I knew it was going to be overturned because of Brayden Point getting his called back because of Johnson. I just knew it.
Move the door or move the line. It's stupid the the door is in the ozone.
The refs are basically giving the sharks the Stanley Cup
Imagine having games handed to you on a sliver platter by the refs. Must be nice to be a shark right now.
So you can review a goal if it’s kicked in but you can’t review a hand pass that leads to a goal? Hmm. Makes sense. (no salt here)
As soon as I saw this I knew it would make it into Dang Its which makes it a little better but as a Blues fan it still stings a lot
The Sharks should change their name to The Referee's Pets
That's a good one , very special
😭
Technically a non call is interfering less with the game than a call. Were they favoring the Blues on the Perron non calls?? Did they tell the Blues to keep missing empty netters? LMAO
Ikr
The question that should be asked is how is that not reviewable? If I didn't know better I'd swear professional sports leagues go out of their way to figure scenarios where a non-existent rule can't be applied.
If you can go back for a missed call like a hand pass, why shouldn't you be able to go back and look at a missed high stick or trip that affected the scoring play? It just opens a rabbit hole and the NHL is trying to avoid that. I'm not saying it's right but I understand why they are so black-and-white about it in the rule book.
Upon further review, it has been determined the Sharks lead the WCF 2 games to 1.
Because of multiple ridiculous calls/non calls.
@@Mr.Pants45 Agreed. Like the non calls on the delay of game by Perron or the hit to head of Braun.
@@chrisolson2846 those didnt directly lead to a scoring opportunity dumbass. There were high sticks by the Sharks too that weren't called. Dont act like you would be saying the same thing if the blues won off of a hand pass. You're being a complete hypocrite.
Mr. Pants chill damn
This is my favourite of these videos, as I am both laughing and furious at once.
This is the sports version of Charlie Day
I got a mosquito bite during this video and right then and there I said dang it oh it itches
Let's go Blues!
And Cardinals!
St. Louis for life!
@@owensnuddster814 yep unfortunately tho it seems like Cardinals are underachieving
Absolutely no reason for Schultz to not gain the red line before sending that puck down toward the empty net. Bad play that, along with the other icing, was going to bite them...you just didn’t expect it to happen on that kind of a play...but then again, stranger legal things have happened in postseason play. Very interested in the first 5 minutes tonight for Game 4, and if both teams don’t get their act together, Boston will eat them alive - well rested, starting at home, and oh by the way, their goaltender just stopped 109/114 shots and their powerplay scored more goals (7) than the Canes scored TOTAL goals (5) in the series, and Boston has the number 1 powerplay in the postseason...
...dang it...
Bettman: "How can we get a Boston + San Jose finals?"
Refs: "I got this..."
Don’t forget that missed delay of game penalty
imagine thinking it was a hand pass lol
Ik imagine bro
The ONLY time that's legal is if the puck is directed from YOUR hand to YOUR stick, NOT another player's.
If the NHL doesn’t fire all of their refs, I, I don’t, I don’t know anymore
These guys are career referees that have officiated THOUSANDS of games.. Who do you suggest would do a better job?? They are human and will make mistakes once in a while, the real issue is the NHL and their wacky rule book on what is and isn't reviewable.
Keep Wes MCauly
@Mike 'Doc' Emrick Wes McCauley is hands down the best.. For the record - he was one of the refs in Sharks/Avs game 7.
@Mike 'Doc' Emrick No sarcasm on my part, just pointing out that the good ones aren't immune from the controversial stuff either.
Watching it frame by frame...
1. Was the puck directed downward by Shark #28 Meier? Yes
2. Was the Meier directing the puck to a teammate? Doubtful
3. Was Meier attempting to reach out with his stick to pass the puck? Possibly
4. If St. Louis Blues Schenn's right leg not deflected Meier's stick could Meier have got his stick on the puck? Again, Possibly
5. If the Blue's stopped Meier from handling the puck after batting it down, can it be ruled a "Hand Pass"? I'm thinking not. Tough call.
I'll add maybe the puck deflected on Bouwmeester's leg because he clearly attempted to kick the puck.... we can't really tell and there is no evidence it did or it didn't.
I think the refs had their binoculars turned the wrong way because there’s no way they missed that hand pass
Well Meier was tripped @SPORTSNET . What else should he do, flop around like Neymar?
Matt's Aviation yes cause San Jose I guarantee the sharks are paying the refs
@@ianbailey6382 blame better the refs, not sharks.
Ian Bailey the only thing your guaranteeing is that you post stupid ass comments
@@ianbailey6382 there's an article on the athletic that goes into depth showing that the officials were all in bad positions and couldn't see it (with a bunch of images). Close ref was below the goal line and had Binnington and Schenn between him and Meier. Meier's back is to the close linesman (on the right side at the blue line) so he can't see it. The back ref is at center ice along with the other linesman, again with Meier's back to them so they can't clearly see it. Did they pay the officials to be in that bad position, but only at that particular time in overtime? Extra bonus for not calling the delay of game on the Blues?
Steve, I've been a Bruins fan since I was 7 in 1961. But I'm also a hockey fan and I love your page.
I hope you don't mind.
Wait, so from my understanding Hamilton got both penalties one for someone elbowing HIM not him elbowing SOMEONE and to for interference?
I’d go with Lunquvist saying: “Someone wants them back in the game obviously”
No Steve, read comments correctly... Meier didn’t kick it with his leg, Bouwmeester did. I still can’t get a Blues fan (or anyone) to definitively tell me that the opposing player’s leg does negate the hand pass or not?!?
Paul Behee Bouwmeester has to have control of it in order to negate the hand pass. With that said watch Meier hit the puck with his hand. It then hits Meier’s stick(watch from all angles and you will see the stick vibrate and you can also hear the puck hitting the stick) and bounces to the Sharks #14 and he passed to Karlsson. Because the puck hit Meier’s stick that should also negate the hand pass. This is one complicated rule. This is how I understand it from reading the official hand pass rule from the NHL rule book. The only reason I think the puck made it to another Shark is because it hit Meier’s stick. In my opinion all Meier tried to do was knock it down, then re gather the puck with his stick and pass it. Who knows maybe I misunderstand this, but I hope it helps
: “A player shall be permitted to stop or ‘bat’ a puck in the air with his open hand, or push it along the ice with his hand, and the play shall not be stopped unless, in the opinion of the on-ice officials, he has directed the puck to a teammate, or has allowed his team to gain an advantage, and subsequently possession and control of the puck is obtained by a player of the offending team, either directly or deflected off any player or official.”
Nice! I actually “discovered” Meier’s stick deflection and that’s why I came back to check comments! 😂
Appreciate the reply AND confirming stick deflect.
just to clarify: why is grabbing some goofs helmet a penalty?
Roughing
@5:20 No, that's a DOUBLE DANG-IT !
This was a great episode, first off. But you can't allow hand passes, because even if you say the puck can't go in off a hand pass, that's not enough. Because players will be chucking all sorts of pucks at or NEAR the net. So then you're going to have to watch slomo replays to see if the puck went in off a hand and then touched a stick or didn't, etc, plus sticks and hands would be batting at the same puck in midair even more often. I get that it doesn't seem bad now, but once players got used to it, it'd become a terrible idea.
You don't understand how anxious I was for this video.
Then you should see that this isnt illegal. I'm a blues fan for 23 years. The hand has to be closed. Dudes hand is wide open. If you want to bitch. Learn the rules.
Steve continues to maintain his spot in my list of favorite humans, I love this man
One of the funniest things I have seen. Well done !
I think you should just have a separate channel called Steves dang it’s !so funny😂
There weren't enough red arrows on the thumbnail; couldn't see the puck.
Looks to me like the hand-pass went off Bouwmeester's shin. Doesn't it change direction slightly?
It's a spinning puck so it's hard to tell, but in my opinion I don't think it touched his shin.
With the tech we have now, devising a system without refs on the rink should be relatively simple…
Even though it would be devastating for a ref to be partial or even bought, some calls make you seriously wonder..
Except fights.
3 controversial calls in favor of the Sharks, 1 in each round of the playoffs ends up helping them out.
Bret hull had one skate in one crease 30 years ago and people still talk about it. The sharks have had too many breaks. If they go all the way it won't be hey remember that good sharks team? It'll be hey remember how in every single round they benefit from a ridiculous call?
Whatever helps everyone sleep at night.
Owen Polley I agree
Glad for the handpass
what turn the blues around and now after 49 years of or time lgb
People complained about the refs making a call that they didn't see when it was game seven sharks vs knights so much that the refs were removed from the postseason and the NHL stressed the importance of only making calls that you actually see. The refs do what they're told to do and not make a call on what they didn't see and now everyone's complaining again. Welcome to the NHL fanbase
Nope...that is not the argument. The argument is if they didn't see it and it was very clearly a breach of the rules, that led to a score, it needs to be reviewed. Almost every other sport has figured this out. I am not in favor of reviewing every little penalty that comes up. That is asinine.
@@xXJMatherXx every penalty should be able to be reviewed. But in current rules, that's just the way it is
Dougie Hamilton is a ginger. It makes sense why he's hated.
He's a grown man who prefers being called "Dougie" - that should be a punishable offense.
Calle Söderberg this x's 10
Sharks didn’t get a break when Perron wasn’t called for an obvious Delay of Game that led to him scoring later in the second. As a Sharks fan, we don’t get all the calls but we got others. Until NHL updates what can and can’t be reviewed, it’s going to keep happening. Nothing any team in the league can do to change that.
Missing a penalty where you'll score 20% of the time on the pp, vs OT to decide the game. Just enjoy getting the calls every damn series. Don't look like an idiot trying to justify it.
11:45 they show Meier clearly making a hand pass
🤣
As a Sharks fan, I am happy to see them get this far, but there’s no fun in winning a cup if every series you play in has a deciding/changing bad call. Vegas deserves to lose for multiple reasons (game 2 being the best reason), but the Avalanche, I don’t know that we deserved that series. I am rooting for whichever team scores first tonight in game 4. If the Blues score first, then they got the first ledgit goal since game 3 went to overtime.
Steve, what are your thoughts about game 2 and the argument that the refs helped decide that game?
simply, Vegas shouldve won the series, but on the other hand, Fleury should have had those pp goals. it shouldve been a Vegas and Colorado matchup, with Colorado winning it. Dallas shouldve won the STL series, and gone onto the WCF with Colorado. simple as that. both teams, dare I say, got cheated outta the WCF, woulda made for a great matchup.
Still no one seeing that it would've been a missed tripping call on Meier. Same time missed calls even out, the Sharks just happened to get the best of it
Hmmmm,in all 3 series they seem to get the right call or non call. Hmmmmm
Rewatch knights and avs series...lots of missed calls and bad calls on sharks.
@@MrDave5259 Go back to game 2 of VGK @ Sharks. Tell me what happened near the start of the second period. If the refs got that right, game 7 likely wouldn't have even happened.
It felt like a devils flashback of Brodeur getting run, looked so similar
(Edit) The skate off the ice I mean
i think joe thorton has quasi-lebron status and the nhl wants him to get a ring. that they allowed that hand pass is completely ridiculous.
@Betty Blue touche betty blue...still doesn't make it right. the nhl needs to fix this. like what is the rational behind not reviewing hand-pass, glass-netting plays when they affect outcomes of games and series ?!!? the whole point of the concept of "video review" is to get calls right. and they are using the reviews and still getting it wrong !@#$#@! its ridiculous. again, the nhl needs to fix this asap. btw... if the story was flipped and this happened to the sharks, the point would still remain. they need to fix the reviewing system asap, cuz its ruining the game.
@Betty Blue then there's also the offside they called on colorado, what can u say to that ?!!? i mean even after video review, they overturned the ice-call and dissalowed the goal ?!?! totally absurd. this one had nothin to do with rules of review, the league just wants joe to get a ring.
@Betty Blue but it has to be conclusive to overturn calls !!! the avs player left foot was on the blue line, or at least it wasnt clear with the tv cameras and all the reviews, and it was called a goal on the ice. has to be conclusive to overturn a call. and this clearly wasnt. soooo, ur right, avs guys should get off the ice sooner, and the coach used his challenge as per the rules...but they still got it wrong. thats the point. the league needs to fix this.
The puck might have bounced off of number 19 when the hand hit the puck which would mean SJS can touch the puck again and it would make it a good goal. And if the dude is off side he is off side LOL!
I think either the Blues or Sharks will beat the Bruins in the final
How about on an OT game 7 goal that was definitely a distinct kicking motion into the net?
garbage person this was the only game really gifted to the sharks. Vegas chocked a 3-1 series lead and a 3-0 lead and even chocked in overtime. Colorado by rule was offsides and landy even took responsibility for it and they had plenty of time to comeback but didn’t so say the sharks can’t win with their own skill is really non sense as they over came a 3-1 deficit and beat Colorado in the series fairly. But still the refs have been horrible all playoffs and they need to be better
garbage person still with Vegas they had to score 3 goals to tie it and they got 4. That takes skill. Vegas a team who is very skilled and proved they can kill the sharks power plays chocked. Colorado would of tied the game if it did count so it’s not like they would of won even if that goal counted so they were not gifted a win there and yeah that ot goal was gifted but even if it was called timo was tripped and the sharks would of had a power play so yeah all the sharks 10 wins have been skilled (given the 10th one the ot goal was due to poor officiating they will earned their way to ot) so you saying the sharks win with no skills is idiotic
garbage person besides good teams play to the end and even if the sharks have “no skill” as you say. What’s that day about Vegas, Colorado, and St. Louis to lose to a sharks team with no skill 🤔
garbage person here’s the deal you play through it no matter what. Just cause they got calls in their favor doesn’t mean they are going to win. They still have to earn it and they did so far throughout all the playoffs. There has been plenty of missed calls against the sharks as well and I guess you can say these even things out. It’s just the sharks capitalize on these chances and their opponents crumble when these calls happen. Good teams play through it. Now the point I’m debating you is that they did play hard and did earn they way here and to say they don’t deserve to be here is very disrespectful to the sharks and the organization. Yes that no call was horrible and I hate that we won that way trust me most sharks fans prefer to win fairly and we agree the officials have been horrible all playoffs but still saying the sharks don’t deserve to be here is bull crap
Alright I enjoy watching these videos it’s freaking dang it hilarious 😂🤘🤘
At least we're getting to where I can laugh my pain over the Avs offside call away. Thanks.
When steve gets excited he sounds like Charlie from it's always sunny.
Boston has got all the calls in the east and San Jose has got all the call in the west.I wonder who the refs like in the final?
How is missing the delay of game over the glass that turned into a Blues goal not a Dangit too? Bitching about the call.... some of the time - you have become what you set out to defeat
Because that didn't directly lead to a series altering goal in overtime. Yeah Perron scored when he should've been in the box, but it wasn't even part of the same play.
@@willhanna2708 One very well doesn't happen without the other so to pretend they are not connect is just silly. The point is refs miss calls - that's part of the game. I do 100% agree, especially in playoffs, that they should make all goals reviewable for ANY infraction. Even tho that call broke my teams way there are SO many that don't and to pretend one team gets more than another is just silly. It happens cause refs are human beings without the benefit of overhead cams. The issue should be with review rules not bitching cause a team got a break
@@odintdeletum6512 I was only explaining why it wasn't on the list. I'm not saying anything about whether it was a worse call or not, I'm not even a blues or sharks fan.
@@willhanna2708 and I am stating why it is stupid to include one and not the other- they BOTH were game changing calls to pick one but not the other is a dangit in itself.
and what the hell could possibly be the rational in not allowing reviews of glass/netting and hand pass plays when they affect goals and outcomes of games, series, stanley cup wiiners !?!? i mean what the fridge is is the point of allowing video reviews - if ur not going to get it right when using them ?!?!? i mean...wtf is going on here ?!?!!? boggles the mind. the nhl has to fix this asap ! they need to get this right. its a joke.
.....If hand- passes are made legal then how far can a player make a pass with his hand.....
.....My point is from what I was told hand passes are illegal because players would close their hand on the puck and throw it.....
Youre dumb. Learn the rules dude. Hand has to be closed for a hand pass to be illegal. Now go back and watch him highfive that puck.
@@domthompson3535 .....No a hand pass is when a player touches the puck with his hand then another player of the same team can receive the puck do to the original players actions.....
.....It is legal only in the teams own defensive end not in the offensive zone.....
.....The HIGH FIVE your own words was not a legal action do to the fact his teammates are the next to play the puck.....
.....IF he had played the puck after handling it or a Blues player had played the puck after his touching it would be a no-call the fact that his teammates played it made it the controversy it is.....
.....NO matter what happens this year the San Jose Sharks will be remembered as a team that was helped by the referees throughout the playoffs.....
In addition to pissing off the Blues so badly that they swept the rest of the series, that hand pass turned into a short running meme for awhile in St. Louis. Local grocery stores were making references to it in commercials, the Cardinals were getting in on it, even police across all levels were making references to it on a regular basis.
Marchand was so funny with Williams the whole playoffs. Vary fun to watch.
This video was amazing.
Carolina - the latest team to get rid of their best player and improve dramatically. Col got rid of duchesne, got better. Car gets rid of Skinner, conference finals.
Hey you should do Ahl dang-its I have a big ref dang-it look at game one of the Bakersfield Condors vs SanDiego Gulls, specifically the Gulls second goal