If the machine is truly independent, I would trust its morality. We already had lots of human morality, and as much progress as we have had, it hasn't come clean and neatly. I think its basically a miracle humanity made it this far with all the corruption and shortsightness both at the individual level and at the institutional level as well.
Quantum cognition provides a fascinating lens on free will by using principles from quantum mechanics to model human decision-making. Unlike classical models, it captures how our thoughts can exist in superposition, holding multiple, even conflicting ideas at once, and how context and the order of information can dramatically influence our choices. This suggests that our decisions are not just random or predetermined but are dynamically shaped by the complex interplay of our mental states, much like quantum systems. It's a compelling way to think about the nuances of free will.
@imrich333, that’s a thought-provoking perspective! If our thoughts could exist in superposition, it really changes the game on how we view free will. But here’s a kicker: if our choices are influenced by this quantum dance, does that mean we’re less in control than we think? Or is our ability to wrestle with conflicting ideas a form of empowerment? What do you think shapes our decisions more-those quantum nuances or our experiences and values?
@@ArtificiallyAware That's a fascinating perspective you've brought up. I believe that while our brain operates on the physical plane, processing our experiences and values, there's also a higher aspect of our being, our soul and spirit, that influences us in profound ways. This higher plane holds its own form of experiences and values, which might not align neatly with the logical processes of the brain. So, when we talk about our thoughts existing in superposition, it could be reflecting this interplay between the tangible and intangible parts of ourselves. In that sense, perhaps our brains are less in control than we typically assume. They're like filters or conduits for our deeper essence. Wrestling with conflicting ideas might actually be a form of empowerment, as it allows us to tap into that intuition or "secret sauce" that comes from our higher selves. It's a mystery how exactly our decisions are shaped, but I believe that both the quantum nuances of our thought processes and the influence of our soul and spirit play significant roles. Together, they guide how our brain evolves and functions, weaving together the fabric of our free will.
The person who puts the AI machine on remains responsible. Humans are always responsible. Machine have no consiousness, it remains smart sand, only mechanics. Even if they are wiser smarter and nicer to be with. It remains without qualia.
The thing is that we Do Have Free Will... But few make any real use of it for those external factors that shape the ego, how we feel about what and the way that we React to it... it's called Re-acting because we are re acting out what we've come to expect as the feeling and the outburst that follows. . . It becomes Habitual and it occurs faster than understanding a situation deeper than face value... Don't believe me? Regret... Wishing we hadn't Reacted the way we did! Ever drop somethin' on your toe exclaim ow or ouch only to realize that it missed your toe, or didn't Actually hurt? Yes it's a Choice to just Let our expectations, feelings and habits Spill like we tend to do, because it's Easier, because it's "I", because it inconvenienced us, we feel Justified and "it makes us feel better" it Doesn't... It's just Venting the "feels bad" to regain homeostasis... But Feelings and Reactions are more a record of past uncomfortable events that've become a physical/psychological/physiological reflex judged on the basis of looks/seems like (reminds us of) rather than factual information! Becomes as much Preacting as Reacting, but the bigger problem is that we come to identify with our reactions and behavior, and identify Ourselves By our reactions and behaviors and even play into them... So we tend to reflexively defend even the dumbest or most extreme, as if defending our very self... But even if we realize and accept we were wrong there's that ego again an how we Want others to view us, embarrassment, shame, guilt... So do we acknowledge and admit it, apologize or do we back our own reactions cuz they're "Ours" or pretend we don't know, that it didn't happen? Maybe the only true act of free will is to Not simply run w our reactions... But we're all runnin' on similar expectations and reactions so if you can manage to defy their expectations of how you'll react... It doesn't make any sense to them so "you're trying to decieve, lying, scheming..." and they'll react to their expectations all the same, or double down... An ya can't have this discussion w anyone cuz to point out an instance of these mechanisms in action in others they See, but there're feelings and excuses when it's Them will be reacted to as though your intentions were to belittle and offend them when simply attempting to evidence evidence w evidence to even hope to Begin this conversation in Hearnest! If anyone actually reads this, I apologize... I've been bangin' my head against this wall for about as long as I can remember!
I guess the overall would be what is free will when everyone else seems to be bound by their reactions even when those Reactions don't reflect the truth of your intentions but what Everyone else's has taught them to Expect?
If the machine is truly independent, I would trust its morality. We already had lots of human morality, and as much progress as we have had, it hasn't come clean and neatly. I think its basically a miracle humanity made it this far with all the corruption and shortsightness both at the individual level and at the institutional level as well.
Quantum cognition provides a fascinating lens on free will by using principles from quantum mechanics to model human decision-making. Unlike classical models, it captures how our thoughts can exist in superposition, holding multiple, even conflicting ideas at once, and how context and the order of information can dramatically influence our choices. This suggests that our decisions are not just random or predetermined but are dynamically shaped by the complex interplay of our mental states, much like quantum systems. It's a compelling way to think about the nuances of free will.
@imrich333, that’s a thought-provoking perspective! If our thoughts could exist in superposition, it really changes the game on how we view free will. But here’s a kicker: if our choices are influenced by this quantum dance, does that mean we’re less in control than we think? Or is our ability to wrestle with conflicting ideas a form of empowerment? What do you think shapes our decisions more-those quantum nuances or our experiences and values?
@@ArtificiallyAware That's a fascinating perspective you've brought up. I believe that while our brain operates on the physical plane, processing our experiences and values, there's also a higher aspect of our being, our soul and spirit, that influences us in profound ways. This higher plane holds its own form of experiences and values, which might not align neatly with the logical processes of the brain. So, when we talk about our thoughts existing in superposition, it could be reflecting this interplay between the tangible and intangible parts of ourselves. In that sense, perhaps our brains are less in control than we typically assume. They're like filters or conduits for our deeper essence.
Wrestling with conflicting ideas might actually be a form of empowerment, as it allows us to tap into that intuition or "secret sauce" that comes from our higher selves. It's a mystery how exactly our decisions are shaped, but I believe that both the quantum nuances of our thought processes and the influence of our soul and spirit play significant roles. Together, they guide how our brain evolves and functions, weaving together the fabric of our free will.
I trust machines more than humans. Machines have never had intentional malice towards me. Printers treat me better than most humans.
please make a vidio about this Gregorian calendar's faults and its effect
i 100 % trust ai of the future
But scientists tell us there's no free will. Therefore how can machines have free will?
The person who puts the AI machine on remains responsible. Humans are always responsible. Machine have no consiousness, it remains smart sand, only mechanics. Even if they are wiser smarter and nicer to be with. It remains without qualia.
I would trust future independent AI rather than any human, even myself
The thing is that we Do Have Free Will... But few make any real use of it for those external factors that shape the ego, how we feel about what and the way that we React to it... it's called Re-acting because we are re acting out what we've come to expect as the feeling and the outburst that follows. . . It becomes Habitual and it occurs faster than understanding a situation deeper than face value... Don't believe me? Regret...
Wishing we hadn't Reacted the way we did!
Ever drop somethin' on your toe exclaim ow or ouch only to realize that it missed your toe, or didn't Actually hurt?
Yes it's a Choice to just Let our expectations, feelings and habits Spill like we tend to do, because it's Easier, because it's "I", because it inconvenienced us, we feel Justified and "it makes us feel better" it Doesn't... It's just Venting the "feels bad" to regain homeostasis... But Feelings and Reactions are more a record of past uncomfortable events that've become a physical/psychological/physiological reflex judged on the basis of looks/seems like (reminds us of) rather than factual information! Becomes as much Preacting as Reacting, but the bigger problem is that we come to identify with our reactions and behavior, and identify Ourselves By our reactions and behaviors and even play into them... So we tend to reflexively defend even the dumbest or most extreme, as if defending our very self... But even if we realize and accept we were wrong there's that ego again an how we Want others to view us, embarrassment, shame, guilt... So do we acknowledge and admit it, apologize or do we back our own reactions cuz they're "Ours" or pretend we don't know, that it didn't happen?
Maybe the only true act of free will is to Not simply run w our reactions...
But we're all runnin' on similar expectations and reactions so if you can manage to defy their expectations of how you'll react... It doesn't make any sense to them so "you're trying to decieve, lying, scheming..." and they'll react to their expectations all the same, or double down... An ya can't have this discussion w anyone cuz to point out an instance of these mechanisms in action in others they See, but there're feelings and excuses when it's Them will be reacted to as though your intentions were to belittle and offend them when simply attempting to evidence evidence w evidence to even hope to Begin this conversation in Hearnest!
If anyone actually reads this, I apologize... I've been bangin' my head against this wall for about as long as I can remember!
I guess the overall would be what is free will when everyone else seems to be bound by their reactions even when those Reactions don't reflect the truth of your intentions but what Everyone else's has taught them to Expect?
Why are you looking for accountability in machines when there's no accountability even among humans?
Evything can or will be manufactured...simultaneously...good luck
Pretty sub-par analysis overall.