Create An Investing Pot Quickly (good debt)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 มี.ค. 2023
  • Trying to get the funds to create a trading or investing account is one of the many hurdles people face. Many trader have small funds and use excessive leverage to compensate, this can lead to blowing up accounts.
    As contentious as it may be, have a larger account from the beginning by using borrowed money, can in fact be the safer and more profitable option. People who have a larger fund base from the outset are less likely to use excessive leverage.
    The main factor however is the use of compounding. If you have an instant injection of cash, you are able to compound from day one, if you have to save incrementally you may miss out on the true compounding benefits.
    This will raise eyebrows no doubt, but it should also open the mind to possibilities.
    Links:-
    My Brokerage Account (Interactive Brokers) - bit.ly/3UGvn1U
    25% Off Stockopedia - bit.ly/2YIcAIn
    Risk/Reward trading spreadsheet - bit.ly/3ea6sl8
    My Trading Spreadsheet/Calculator - bit.ly/3ea6sl8
    Technical Screener - bit.ly/3ea6sl8
    Back test software - bit.ly/3ea6sl8 (20% Discount code FWSDM)
    My Breakout Scanner - www.financialwisdomtv.com/ser...
    My Forum - www.financialwisdomtv.com/ser...
    FREE Trading Tools/Software/Stuff - bit.ly/3ea6sl8
    My Strategy Blueprint - www.financialwisdomtv.com/ser...
    Edgewonk Trade Analysis Software - bit.ly/3xS6S7s Coupon Code = FWISDOM
    Stock Trading videos:-
    RSI Divergence - • You CAN Time The Marke...
    Trading Psychology - • Master Trading Psychol...
    Championship Winning Strategy - • The Best Trading Strat...
    Donchian Channel Strategy - • Breakout Trading using...
    Best Trading Indicator - • Best Trading Indicator...
    Trade Using Google Trends - • Trading Strategies Usi...
    Timing The Market - • You CAN Time The Marke...
    Best Chart Patterns - • The Best Chart Pattern...
    Trend Following Study - • DOES TREND FOLLOWING W...
    Trade Like A Casino - • How to Trade Stocks (U...
    Dollar Cost Averaging - • Dollar Cost Averaging ...
    Stop Loss vs Buy Hold - • Stop Loss Strategy VS ...
    Trading Theory - • Best Trading Strategy ...
    Dow Theory - • DOW THEORY - What is i...
    Past Bear Markets - • PAST BEAR MARKETS & Ho...
    Buy & Hope - • FINANCIAL EDUCATION GO...
    Warren Buffet - • WARREN BUFFET Investin...
    David Ryan US Champion - • BEST Stock Trading Str...
    Trading Expectations - • REALISTIC STOCK TRADIN...
    Super Trader - • Dr Van Tharp - SUPER T...
    Oliver Kell US Champion - • BEST Trading Strategy ...
    The Disciplined Trader - • Video
    Kristjan Qullamaggie - • KRISTJAN QULLAMAGGIE -...
    Avoiding Drawdown - • AVOIDING DRAWDOWN - In...
    Breakout Screener - • CONSOLIDATION BREAKOUT...
    MACD Explained - • MACD INDICATOR EXPLAIN...
    Risk Reward Ratio - • RISK REWARD RATIO - Tr...
    William O'Neil Disciples • Trade Like a WILLIAM O...
    Dual Momentun • DUAL MOMENTUM | Moment...
    Dan Zanger • DAN ZANGER | Breakout ...
    Paul Tudor Jones • PAUL TUDOR JONES - Bil...
    Spread Betting Naked Trader • NAKED TRADER'S Guide t...
    Martin Schwartz Pit Bull • MARTIN SCHWARTZ | PIT ...
    Kelly Criterion • KELLY CRITERION | Ed T...
    Timothy Sykes • TIMOTHY SYKES - Tradin...
    Think And Trade Like A Champion • MARK MINERVINI THINK A...
    Van Tharp • VAN THARP Trade Your W...
    Turtle Traders • TURTLE TRADERS STRATEG...
    Ed Seykota • ED SEYKOTA Interview b...
    Thomas Bulkowski Candlestick patterns • CANDLESTICK PATTERNS b...
    Nicolas Darvas • NICOLAS DARVAS Box Tr...
    Swing Trading • SWING TRADING STRATEGI...
    Lone Stock Trader • LONE STOCK TRADER - Fr...
    Mark Douglas • NICOLAS DARVAS Box Tr...
    Jesse Stine • JESSE STINE INSIDER BU...
    Stan Weinstein • STAN WEINSTEIN - SECRE...
    Peter Brandt • DIARY OF A PROFESSIONA...
    Mark Minervini • MARK MINERVINI- Trade ...
    Alexander Elder • TRADING FOR A LIVING D...
    Investing videos:-
    Joel Greenblatt - • JOEL GREENBLATT - THE ...
    Tony Robbins - • MONEY MASTER THE GAME ...
    Robert Kiyosaki - • RICH DAD POOR DAD REVI...
    The Naked Trader - • THE NAKED TRADER - Rob...
    Common Stocks Uncommon Profits - • COMMON STOCKS AND UNCO...
    A Random Walk Down Wall Street - • A RANDOM WALK DOWN WAL...
    Vanguard Index Investments - • VANGUARD INVESTMENTS |...
    As a long term investor/trader I have consumed hundreds of financial books and endured countless hours of self education. My hope is that this channel will reduce the learning curve duration of many aspiring investors by providing the key information in a concise and enjoyable manner.
    I also offer a paid subscription service for those looking to see all my investment decisions.www.financialwisdomtv.com/forum

ความคิดเห็น • 115

  • @FinancialWisdom
    @FinancialWisdom  ปีที่แล้ว +5

    My Brokerage Account (Interactive Brokers) - bit.ly/3UGvn1U
    My Breakout Scanner - bit.ly/3ea6sl8
    My Forum - www.financialwisdomTV.com/service
    My Strategy Blueprint - www.financialwisdomtv.com/service
    Stockopedia 25% Discount - bit.ly/2YIcAIn
    Trading Simulator - www.financialwisdomtv.com/shop

  • @DrFrankPn
    @DrFrankPn ปีที่แล้ว +5

    There's mistake in the calculations of the real profit from investing using borrowed money: you have also to consider that you have to give back the installments to the loaner (part of capital + interests), so the capital on which the compound interest operates, is reduced each time you pay an installment. A good example of the force of compound interest though.

  • @Luciaoakley
    @Luciaoakley ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The stock market is one of the toughest mental games in the world, What’s is the earliest way to make money from the stock market?

    • @maryreagan912
      @maryreagan912 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Giovanni Nolan Please, How can i get in touch with a financial coach for guidance?

    • @Clementinelily852
      @Clementinelily852 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Gerald reputation already speaks for him last month I invested over $100,000 with him and I've already made over $250,000 profit.

    • @Open001
      @Open001 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@Giovanni Nolan Thanks for sharing, I found his details on his web page online

  • @joeyf504327
    @joeyf504327 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I always wondered how many people were doing this with 2% mortgages in the mid 2010s. An interesting concept to ponder. It does of course ignore job security, income taxes, life events, and other important factors. For most people, you cannot put a price on peace of mind. The peace of mind of having zero debt is a great feeling. You own what is yours.

    • @FinancialWisdom
      @FinancialWisdom  ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Sure - But you would have piece of mind with a growing 100K too right? If you use all your money to pay down your mortgage and half way through you lose your job you might be forced to sell. Whereas if you lost your job but had remortaged to take cash out prior, you would have plenty of liquid funds to survive. I see that as piece of mind....

  • @bikerfreak714
    @bikerfreak714 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Appreciate the challenge to think outside conventional wisdom. However, I think there's a big assumption being made in these examples. Which is the investment is allowed to compound without interruption till end of study without regard for the loan repayments. Unless there's an alternative source of income to pay back the debt, one would need to make regular withdrawals against the investment; negating the compounding effect you described.

    • @user-ow6jk5ix5q
      @user-ow6jk5ix5q ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Agreed. The comparison is leaving out the factor of the extra income that had to come in in order to service the loan. A penny in column A is the same as a penny in column B. The difference is what that penny is doing. Borrowing at 5% and investing at 3%, that penny is net debt 2%. The difference in the comparison's outcome is being paid for in the lifestyle difference in order to sustain the increased loan payments. Comparison should be made in a closed system which accounts for all movements of funds. The housing equity is a great point however. It's a gamble, but if you can reliably cover the costs anyway, and know the housing market's long-term trend outpaces the mortgage costs, you're basically keeping the investment of someone else's money for sitting on the risk of the market changing. In the current interest climate, I feel sorry for someone who's overleveraged, but if you got into a $1M mansion at 1% interest after the '08 crash and paid only interest of $10k/y, that's about $150k spent until 2023. Meanwhile inflation in housing prices from 2008 to 2023 totals about 45%, meaning that McMansion is now worth about $1.45M. $450k - $150k = $300k essentially free money (bought at the cost of holding the risk). If you had continually borrowed against the increased equity down to the original mortgage and invested that, you'd be even further ahead. If you did it in such a way as to deduct the interest as a tax expense, then you'd be even further ahead still. IIRC this is known as the Smith Move.

  • @williamkz
    @williamkz ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Thanks Gareth. Thought provoking as always. There a couple of variables that need to be considered with this including age of the investor, Capital Gains Tax and Dividend Tax. Plus the possibility of a 'lost decade' for the SPX such as 2000-2009. I think it could work quite well for a young investor with the money in an ISA. But someone starting this investment in January 2022 would have seen a fast drawdown of 20% which would be unnerving. There are also currency risks for the UK investor - who does well when the USD strengthens, but not so well when the GBP strengthens. If the GBP strengthens 10% against the USD, theUS tracker fund (eg VUSA) will devalue by 10%.

    • @FinancialWisdom
      @FinancialWisdom  ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Very true william - Thought provoking was the goal 👍

  • @coryp9139
    @coryp9139 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The problem I see that you did not account for was the cash used to make the loans monthly payments. Where does that come from? It can’t come from your investments because then you would be lowering the amount of your investment, decreasing your investment returns. At that point it might be better to dollar cost average into the S&P with the cash you would use to make the loan payments.

    • @mrm8818
      @mrm8818 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      With the money already in the S&P, wouldnt you be paying off the loan with your salary?

    • @FinancialWisdom
      @FinancialWisdom  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Which part of the video cory? The monthly payment whether it be capital or the interest only would come from you regular income

    • @kariyapperuma
      @kariyapperuma ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@FinancialWisdom At least someone has seen the light. No offence to Gareth. I see the bigger picture. I have done exactly the same with a second mortgage at a 1% 5-year fix. But your calculations aren't like for like. If you take the cost of servicing extra debt, you reduce the potential gains!! You can't just say it is coming from regular income. If that's the case, you need to add the same amount to the other side for a fair comparison.

    • @FinancialWisdom
      @FinancialWisdom  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kariyapperuma no. If you have interest only you can release capital and keep the overall payment the same as a repayment mortgage, therefore the difference is neutral

    • @coryp9139
      @coryp9139 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I was unaware that you could pay the interest only on a home loan. I had to watch it again to catch it.

  • @TheMinuteSignChannel
    @TheMinuteSignChannel ปีที่แล้ว +3

    There is one HUGE factor that is being overlooked in this scenario... you have to be able to make the payments of the loan!
    I would doubt many people could afford more debt obligation to their current situation???

    • @FinancialWisdom
      @FinancialWisdom  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Of course but I'm sure most would understand this. Also consider though, any short term payment concerns could be covered by the growing investment to meet short term demands.

  • @marinrodriguez7729
    @marinrodriguez7729 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In these days of high interest rates it doesnt make a ton of sense but in the good old days of 2% mortgage rates it made a ton of sense! At sub-5% rates, depending on term of loan and such, the payments were about $500/month. You would def have to do the maths on whether or not you could reasonably afford to make the new payment. But if you could get an interest only loan or do a reasonably rated cash-out refi then it def is worth considering. Everyones situation is different and there are many ways of borrowing money.

  • @ClownTrader1
    @ClownTrader1 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow, I have been wondering this exact thing, great minds think alike.
    The King Speaks!

  • @mikelCold
    @mikelCold ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Can you make a video on all the various risks and consequences? For when things don't go as planned, and maybe also how to recover.

  • @KakvTheWorld
    @KakvTheWorld ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is a really interesting topic and one I've been researching. One method was moving to an interest only mortgage and using the difference in the amount of repayment vs interest only to pay into my pension which should yield a better % return and then using the increase pension pot to pay off the remaining capital on the mortgage.
    I think borrowing such a sum against the mortgage to make this work is difficult for most as the increase in monthly payment even on an interest only mortgage could be prohibitive, but it's certainly food for thought

  • @MikeWick718
    @MikeWick718 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your content has been a huge help in my progress. Thank you!!
    I was wondering, since you do your consolidation. charting on the weekly time frame, on what time frame do you make your entries and exits? Thanks!

  • @RajeshChauhan-xg4er
    @RajeshChauhan-xg4er ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent Info man, keep up the good work. Thanks, a lot!

  • @Sem_Henares
    @Sem_Henares ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice " thinking out of the box" video- well done!

  • @chadkoller5327
    @chadkoller5327 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video! I'm always looking for unconventional ways to improve my family's financial situation

  • @speculator191
    @speculator191 ปีที่แล้ว

    You need to substract the money needed to pay the installment each year from the investment account. Reduce the ending balance of each year by 701.52 then youll get the real number.

  • @cwsi
    @cwsi 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Absolutley brilliant, helping people with these videos is true giving back! I can't thank you enough for bringing this to light, keep up the great work and I have now subscribed

  • @aubreypwilliams
    @aubreypwilliams ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic video! I immediately sent to several people that I thought would benefit. You’re careful analysis in comparison really big. Bravo.

  • @alphabeta8403
    @alphabeta8403 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    *Be a contrarian!*
    No Pain, No Gain.

  • @nimrod6603
    @nimrod6603 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great content as ever Gareth, thank you!

  • @BioInsight_Lectures
    @BioInsight_Lectures ปีที่แล้ว +1

    waav great advice and learning. no words to say "Thankyou" ...

  • @faizulanuar2474
    @faizulanuar2474 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    “Technical and, perhaps, fundamental analysis”
    Hmm i think there is an important hidden message here…

  • @sphanationsphanation2426
    @sphanationsphanation2426 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was waiting for this video for a while now

  • @TenTonNuke
    @TenTonNuke 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Max out my credit, take out a 2nd mortgage on my house, and put it all into the stock market. Got it.

    • @FinancialWisdom
      @FinancialWisdom  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No don't max out your credit. But if you can leverage lower cost debt with higher rate of return then absolutely

  • @PaulRacko2
    @PaulRacko2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Alas, the era of cheap debt is over.

  • @DeadRaterMI
    @DeadRaterMI ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Don't forget about Uncle Sam, He needs a cut of that gain.

  • @wellsmaciel
    @wellsmaciel ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well done mate!

  • @user-xn2wg2oe7s
    @user-xn2wg2oe7s ปีที่แล้ว +2

    In theory you can squeeze out a bit of extra profit from the strategy outlined in the video, but in practice this is very bad advise, because it will only work if you make no mistakes.
    The problem is that everyone learning to trade and manage a portfolio will make mistakes, many of which are unforeseeable until you're facing them.
    Simply assuming a 7%/yr avg S&P500 return is by no means conservative given you can have a terrible cost basis if you bid near the top, and margin in general will not help anyone who isn't high IQ (any consequently probably shouldn't need it anyways).
    Additionally statistics about the highest growth companies using debt is technically true however what you will often be looking at is a sample of companies that were fortunate enough to not fail (encounter debt servicing issues) in their infantcy despite an additional risk (survivorship bias).

    • @FinancialWisdom
      @FinancialWisdom  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm with you on survivorship bias, this is a hidden factor that many do not consider.
      7% is conservative, 33%+ less than the long term average.

    • @user-xn2wg2oe7s
      @user-xn2wg2oe7s ปีที่แล้ว

      @Financial Wisdom Thank you for being receptive to my comment.
      You make quality videos and I wasn't trying to give unjust criticism.
      An example of how assuming 7%/yr is often unrealistic (due to a very common trader issue) is when someone takes their first large position and panic-selling occurs due to a bad stretch.
      If they do not have some macro and technical understanding criteria upon which to re-enter, there can be great inefficiencies that will not allow for a good average return.
      My first significant losing day on stocks was not something I was able to psychologically recover from quickly, especially because I was right to sell when I did because everything went down a lot further.
      If I was to not have sold when I did and use a heuristic of having exposure due to "avg S&P500 returns" I would have gotten slaughtered (as I expect was the experience for most retail traders).

  • @thomas1942
    @thomas1942 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have a HELCO right now. Haven't done anything with it. I have thought about something similar. I have no kids or relatives that could inherit my house when i kick the bucket. Really would like to make use of it before i move on. I rather spend it on traveling in my retirement, then letting it go to the state or whomever. I guess a reverse mortgage is always an option.

    • @FinancialWisdom
      @FinancialWisdom  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes. A lifetime mortgage would be a great option in your case.

  • @brybryBillions
    @brybryBillions ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Dave Ramsey needs to watch this 😆

    • @FinancialWisdom
      @FinancialWisdom  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      LOL - He has some good foundation but is far too conventional

  • @csm6499
    @csm6499 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hi. am I missing a critical point?
    I assume the amortisation (reducing interest rate over time) occurs bc of the principle paid each year.
    Where does the money come from to pay the principle? ( Is it from new money, earnings from your trading or capital from the original loan) In either case it changes your figures....?
    Also how do you hedge against rising interest rates and falling equities in this example?
    Sounds like risky advice for beginners.
    Thank you

    • @AIBlocks-mu8rz
      @AIBlocks-mu8rz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I thought the same! shouldn´t that principal be substracted from monthly interest of the investment, to pay it off?
      then 2nd year you should have $10.093,81 on your start balance..and so on. Right?

  • @francescomatteuzzi1206
    @francescomatteuzzi1206 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi. While it's true that if you take a 10K$ loan for 25 years (paying 701.52$ back each year as amortization) and invest that sum in something that gives you a 3% annual return you end up with a larger total than just piling up what you would have paid to estinguish the loan, it's also true that if you would invest each year those 701.52$ in the same 3% annual return investment you would end up with even a larger sum (more than 25K$ against the 20K$ investing the borrowed money, at the end of the 25th year), and that's true until the return of the investment is lower than the interest applied to the loan.

  • @MadMaxBeyondThunderBone
    @MadMaxBeyondThunderBone ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice comparisons there 👍

  • @adriancristea7924
    @adriancristea7924 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you recommend a book / paper for an indepth analysis on this topic?

  • @JohnJames-mg6fc
    @JohnJames-mg6fc ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome video

  • @reheyesd8666
    @reheyesd8666 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Never usually like videos but this is great content and I couldn't avoid doing it! Fanstatic video!
    Debt is risky and exploring the theory behind debt is always interesting.

  • @GregMeg
    @GregMeg ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very interesting

  • @jpalan
    @jpalan ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What do you mean "perhaps a fundamental analysis"?
    Trading just or mainly fundamentals might not be the most common approach, but it's not exactly unheard of.

    • @FinancialWisdom
      @FinancialWisdom  ปีที่แล้ว

      I personally use both. I look for good quality companies and buy them at a solid technical setup offering controlled risk.

  • @ut561
    @ut561 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow definitely thinking outside the box :)

  • @RandyRecords63
    @RandyRecords63 ปีที่แล้ว

    How are these people making the extra interest and principal payments on their home equity line of credit? You should probably subtract these payments from the returns on the S&P 500.
    I also don’t think 5% is very probable. Especially for a fixed rate loan today.

  • @COOLDUDE090
    @COOLDUDE090 ปีที่แล้ว

    have you consider taxation in your calculations?

    • @FinancialWisdom
      @FinancialWisdom  ปีที่แล้ว

      No tax, but that is why I kept it Conservative

  • @ciaoatutti11111111
    @ciaoatutti11111111 ปีที่แล้ว

    Question can you really get a 25 years interest only loan at 5% for your residential property?

  • @gelex911
    @gelex911 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good luck if those 15 years are like 1999-2014 🤦🤦🤦

  • @SPQR_14
    @SPQR_14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You aren't including the loan payments in the same account as the compounding payments. But it is the same money. You calculate compounding returns without factoring in the reduced capital due to servicing the loan. It doesn't make any sense.

  • @viking8889
    @viking8889 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Get a prop trading account

  • @stchicken
    @stchicken ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i struggle to explain this to my friends too lmao also topics like renting is cheaper than home ownership, so many arguemetns hahahaha

    • @stchicken
      @stchicken ปีที่แล้ว +1

      the secret sauce is that you can invest in things that yield alot mroe than sp500 7% and this is how u compound into infiinite money :DD dont tell the tax man shhhh

  • @charliethomas9173
    @charliethomas9173 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is assuming that you have a seperate pool of money to make the loan repayments

    • @FinancialWisdom
      @FinancialWisdom  ปีที่แล้ว

      A wage, although if you switched to interest only you can borrow more with the same outgoing

  • @marpolek
    @marpolek ปีที่แล้ว

    .... 1st option is a bullshit, it makes the assumption that investment's interest is reinvested and not used during the investment period, but it doesn't take into consideration that at the same time you need to somehow get the money to pay the loan installments.... and over the 25 periods (no matter what they are) the difference is not significant enough to jeopardize one person's liquidity

  • @michaelmcl2511
    @michaelmcl2511 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello. I don't think the video showed the real story frankly. You didn't explain how the person is servicing the loan. Their income and expenses are the same so therefore the loan would need to be serviced using the interest / principal of the loan. In the amortized ex. they would be screwed, in the simple interest ex of the HELOC the end number would be lower..

  • @kiranf
    @kiranf ปีที่แล้ว

    Hmmmm.. The calculation will not be completed without showing returns from second option ie that is Monthly payments you are making into loan can be used to make SIP investment if you do not have the loan...... Since you are claiming to be confident of 7% return same must be applied to SIP also...It will make only sense if first option generates more profit than second.....

    • @FinancialWisdom
      @FinancialWisdom  ปีที่แล้ว

      Agree Kiran, but if you align the interest only payment to the total monthly payment of the loan I.e parity each month, you release funds to compound from day one

  • @shaunsprogress
    @shaunsprogress ปีที่แล้ว

    The SPX has in a number of cases, in real terms given ABSOLUTELY horrendous returns, like 85% loss in the late 60s to 70s. We may be facing something like that soon.
    Do not put all your eggs in one basket, look at how expensive assets are now relative to one another over and how they cycle over years and decades.

    • @FinancialWisdom
      @FinancialWisdom  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just use a 10 ema 20 ema crossover on a weekly chart, no significant spx drawdown. Simple risk control

  • @dishingoyani7510
    @dishingoyani7510 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    in theory it is good but not practical

  • @lukelwang
    @lukelwang ปีที่แล้ว

    Seems your calculation is based an assumption that you don't need to pay your debt monthly, instead paying it back at the end of the loan period?

    • @FinancialWisdom
      @FinancialWisdom  ปีที่แล้ว

      Just divide it by 12, same as the investment compounding annually not monthly

  • @beny.5736
    @beny.5736 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your case of borrowing at 5% to invest at 3% is a bad example because the loan is being repaid over time, which means your leverage is decreasing over time. Of course the interest incurred would be lower if the principal decreases over time.

    • @FinancialWisdom
      @FinancialWisdom  ปีที่แล้ว

      I miss your point - what you refer to is amortization as pointed out.

  • @raychows7712
    @raychows7712 ปีที่แล้ว

    Rising interest rates destroys your SP500 and property projections.

    • @reheyesd8666
      @reheyesd8666 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Technically yes. If you get a long date mortgaged sure you are payin more in interest rates but you know the costs.

    • @mrm8818
      @mrm8818 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Interest rates always rise. The high 10-11% or even more in the past are short lived (approx 1-3 years).
      The 2-3% rate is an ideal some countries are after but this figure can be had if you average it out over the years as well.
      Not only that, but, not every business in the S&P500, is negatively affected by inflation.
      What this guy said does make a lot of sense given the appropriate time horizon.

    • @FinancialWisdom
      @FinancialWisdom  ปีที่แล้ว

      The key is fixing the interest rate i.e 15 to 30 years. The S&P has always delivered long term

    • @FinancialWisdom
      @FinancialWisdom  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks Mr M

  • @AkshayGowda007
    @AkshayGowda007 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    my own experience i took loan at 7.5% to buy a car even though i had cash invested in stock market thinking i will make minimum 12%, past 1 year bear market is going on i am losing money in the stock market investments & i am paying interest to the loan,😅