I’ve always thought of that subject this way: That even though The Lion King does feature lions it doesn’t always stick by nature’s laws and is more focused on storytelling and character development than anything else. Plus Disney animators have mentioned in interviews that the story is inspired heavily from Hamlet and from Bambi, so they stuck close to inspirations more like those as opposed to nature.
Yeah, they're actions are supposed to refect humans which is why Kovu was switched from being Scar's son to being adopted in the sequel. Honestly if this reflected how real lions are there would be no movie
Id like to think that like in nature, Mufasa and Scar were not related, exiled from the pride and in order to survive, they complimented each other with wits and strength. Their bond would be so strong that they would be always together. But when they took over a new pride, Mufasa had a different idea of ruling that didn't sit well with Scar so he would resent him ever since. That way also Kovu could easy be Scars son and there would be no issues
Okay, that's is cool and all. I actually know all of these facts about lions they're one of my favorite animals. However, this is a fantasy film, where the lions act like humans, are subject to human like laws, they even resemble the actors that lent their voices to the film. They are basically humans in lion suits if you will.
If all that's said in this video about the soecific breed of lions is true, then Disney really fid Scar a serious injustice by protraying him as mean and imcompatent as a ruler.
It's not quite that simple darker hair is a sign of having more testosterone Now the rightful king goes to which one was is stronger not who has darker hair Just because your brothers doesn't mean you are going to be the same physically and there is more to strength than just testosterone. Scar is noticeably smaller than mufasa which in most scenarios the larger male is going to win the fight
So apparently there was a sequel idk if this counts it’s a book.. So how did he get the nickname Scar? Apparently, when he was still known as Taka, he befriended the hyenas when he was In the lion guard. His father found out and gave him that scar. He was also brought up defeating the lion guard in the series if that’s any consolation.
The whole lion guard wasn't brought up yet. I learned that Taka received his scar from Boma in the Tales of two brother. He renamed himself as Scar to make up with his new identity.
If anything scar shouldve been adopted. Disney keeps rehashing and now even changing their stories. If Ahadi isn't Mufasa's father, the story is trash.
Well yes and no. It’s mainly the mane that matters in this situation. The longer and darker, the better. But more specifically the darker. Besides, Mufasa and Scar are in the same litter, therefore they are (fraternal) twins.
I say scar should have been King and probably would have never even needed the hyenas around if Mufassa hadn’t showed up. But do you think he is strong enough to take on hyenas if they were in the pride lands. Meaning the circle of life would have stayed in balance if he was king
6:34 It's more to get the lioness to have their cubs. They wouldn't have cubs with the new males when raising the formal male's cubs and the new pride males tend to rule for only a few years. The new males would also be spending a lot of time with each lioness after getting rid of the cubs. With 2 new males it would nore or less a coin flip who fathered which cubs since both would have been with the mother at the time.
Scar was the lion guard leader. Kion was the lion guard leader. Kion gave up his line up to his sister for the sister to be queen. Your video is false.
@cmoney6691 the new live action movie that is coming out follows the tail of 2 Brothers, not the lion guard. I wish it where cannon tbh, but it's not, unfortunately.
But this isn’t a documentary about real lions. It’s a movie by Disney. Also, I thought scar was in exile by his and Mufasa’s father. Not sure how I got to that conclusion. 😂
1:48 So if Scar and Mufasa we're the only adult male lions around (or that we saw) does that mean Mufasa had a cub with someone else, and did Scar have a cub aswell?
That's a good theory but it's clear that the universe in the movie is really far from reality. I also want to note that although Scar's black mane would be an advantage for charming females, it would also mean he would have problems with absorbing heat (as the color black does it really well), leading to troubles for keeping his body temperature in check (and by extension the temperature of his "royal jewels" as well), leading to defects in fertility, making it harder for him to have offsprings. ( And also hunting but he's a male so he doesn't really need it).
It would be amazing if you could do what actually happened to chumvi,kula and sarabi to find out my they disappeared and a video of who nalas father well I know his name is matuta
how come no one ever comments about the fact there was only three males in the pride so all the female cubs had to be Scars or Mufasas and its shown the lionesses don't like Scar so Simba got with his sister.
No he was talking about real lions and how scar mane resembles a older lions mane read the real lion king story mufasa and scar were always brothers I don’t know why Disney changed the story
What’s crazy is that most black haired lions in real life are more attractive by female lionesses and not only that it’s the fact that mufasa might be the real villain based on how he treated scar/Taka when they was growing up as cubs smh. Scar/Taka should’ve been chosen to be the next king in my opinion and he would’ve been the good guy.
@@davidcaudill7779 not necessarily you could enjoy the movie so much that did you want to dig into it a little bit more and feel in some of the plot holes
How come Scar is Mufasa younger brother but he looks way older that Mufasa? In the movie Scar only mentions that Mufasa is his big brother and not his older brother so big brother as in size??
Simba wouldn’t have even survived to even the intro because lioness will abandon a litter if either, all but one cub died, or there was only one cub. In short, if he were to live at least a little longer, he would had to have siblings.
I think you're right you just spoiled the whole plot of mufasa The Lion King. Live action prequel coming out this December. Mufasa was an orphan in the poster according to what it says. I think that's what Disney's going for with the live-action remake. Live-action remake is a realistic what would happen in real life.
There's no such thing as a "rightful king" in a pride. It gies by whichsoever lion is a better alpha male. Scar pretty much says this in The Lion King when Mufass comes to see why Scar wasn't at Simba's presentation.
I was thinking that he was made King because he was older ,and the Cartoon movie was going by human nature instead of Lion nature. 👑🎩💎 go by age ,and 👔🧢💼 go by votes . If your a King/Queen you live like this 🐩🐎🦢🌹🌺🍵🏰🏯🏸🏏🪭🪮👑. If you are a President/Prime Minister you most likely live like this 🐕🐐🦆🌻🌲🍉🍞 🥓🍔🍕🌭🍩🥧🍫🍭🏢⛲️ ⚽️🏀🏈🥊🎮👟🪖.
I’ve always thought of that subject this way: That even though The Lion King does feature lions it doesn’t always stick by nature’s laws and is more focused on storytelling and character development than anything else. Plus Disney animators have mentioned in interviews that the story is inspired heavily from Hamlet and from Bambi, so they stuck close to inspirations more like those as opposed to nature.
Yeah, they're actions are supposed to refect humans which is why Kovu was switched from being Scar's son to being adopted in the sequel. Honestly if this reflected how real lions are there would be no movie
Who’s here after seeing the new trailer ? This guy was spot on
Id like to think that like in nature, Mufasa and Scar were not related, exiled from the pride and in order to survive, they complimented each other with wits and strength. Their bond would be so strong that they would be always together. But when they took over a new pride, Mufasa had a different idea of ruling that didn't sit well with Scar so he would resent him ever since. That way also Kovu could easy be Scars son and there would be no issues
Sorry for your loss
Kovu isn't actually Scar's son, as Nuka points out.
"Scar wasn't even his father."
Pulling strings got my attention, i learnt most of this on film theory.
Lol you are Pinocchio
Okay, that's is cool and all. I actually know all of these facts about lions they're one of my favorite animals. However, this is a fantasy film, where the lions act like humans, are subject to human like laws, they even resemble the actors that lent their voices to the film. They are basically humans in lion suits if you will.
Exactlyy
Let them know👌🏼
If all that's said in this video about the soecific breed of lions is true, then Disney really fid Scar a serious injustice by protraying him as mean and imcompatent as a ruler.
3:47 Mufasa and Sarabi: “(Individually and nonverbally to Simba) I’m SO proud of you”
It's not quite that simple darker hair is a sign of having more testosterone
Now the rightful king goes to which one was is stronger not who has darker hair
Just because your brothers doesn't mean you are going to be the same physically and there is more to strength than just testosterone. Scar is noticeably smaller than mufasa which in most scenarios the larger male is going to win the fight
So apparently there was a sequel idk if this counts it’s a book.. So how did he get the nickname Scar? Apparently, when he was still known as Taka, he befriended the hyenas when he was In the lion guard. His father found out and gave him that scar. He was also brought up defeating the lion guard in the series if that’s any consolation.
The whole lion guard wasn't brought up yet.
I learned that Taka received his scar from Boma in the Tales of two brother.
He renamed himself as Scar to make up with his new identity.
@@QueSeraSeraaaanon canon his now real birth name is Askari
It's possible scar and mufasa are only half Brothers
They are not brothers Mufasa is adopted guess we’ll see in the lion king prequel
If anything scar shouldve been adopted. Disney keeps rehashing and now even changing their stories. If Ahadi isn't Mufasa's father, the story is trash.
I see that now@@footballplayercareers1314
That was Fascinating to dissect!
Very interesting analysis of Disney's The Lion King.
Mufasa was older and stronger, he was the rightful heir.
Well yes and no. It’s mainly the mane that matters in this situation. The longer and darker, the better. But more specifically the darker. Besides, Mufasa and Scar are in the same litter, therefore they are (fraternal) twins.
But scar was smarter
Mufasa was adopted , scar is the rightful heir
@@MegaJackal21that’s a whole new story
Mufasa is a stray and saved by scar who is they rightful heir ss stated by his own father, who is the king
Awesome thanks
I thought of Scar being popular with female lions in his youth is something.
I say scar should have been King and probably would have never even needed the hyenas around if Mufassa hadn’t showed up.
But do you think he is strong enough to take on hyenas if they were in the pride lands. Meaning the circle of life would have stayed in balance if he was king
6:34 It's more to get the lioness to have their cubs. They wouldn't have cubs with the new males when raising the formal male's cubs and the new pride males tend to rule for only a few years. The new males would also be spending a lot of time with each lioness after getting rid of the cubs. With 2 new males it would nore or less a coin flip who fathered which cubs since both would have been with the mother at the time.
Scar was the lion guard leader. Kion was the lion guard leader. Kion gave up his line up to his sister for the sister to be queen. Your video is false.
Lion guard isn't cannon
@@weeb535where did you get that accusation pretty much on every Lion King wiki kion is the son of Simba and the leader of the lion guard
@cmoney6691 the new live action movie that is coming out follows the tail of 2 Brothers, not the lion guard. I wish it where cannon tbh, but it's not, unfortunately.
@@weeb535 the live-action and cartoon are two completely different universes
@cmoney6691 ik, but it's based on the book wich is widely regarded to be cannon
But this isn’t a documentary about real lions. It’s a movie by Disney. Also, I thought scar was in exile by his and Mufasa’s father. Not sure how I got to that conclusion. 😂
1:48 So if Scar and Mufasa we're the only adult male lions around (or that we saw) does that mean Mufasa had a cub with someone else, and did Scar have a cub aswell?
That's a good theory but it's clear that the universe in the movie is really far from reality. I also want to note that although Scar's black mane would be an advantage for charming females, it would also mean he would have problems with absorbing heat (as the color black does it really well), leading to troubles for keeping his body temperature in check (and by extension the temperature of his "royal jewels" as well), leading to defects in fertility, making it harder for him to have offsprings. ( And also hunting but he's a male so he doesn't really need it).
It would be amazing if you could do what actually happened to chumvi,kula and sarabi to find out my they disappeared and a video of who nalas father well I know his name is matuta
how come no one ever comments about the fact there was only three males in the pride so all the female cubs had to be Scars or Mufasas and its shown the lionesses don't like Scar so Simba got with his sister.
You called it a year ago
So true.
Came here after the new trailer and you are totally right. Scar was the rightful heir and he is the one who accept Mufasa as his brother...
No he was talking about real lions and how scar mane resembles a older lions mane read the real lion king story mufasa and scar were always brothers I don’t know why Disney changed the story
if you watched the new mufasa trailer you would know how this video aged so well
What’s crazy is that most black haired lions in real life are more attractive by female lionesses and not only that it’s the fact that mufasa might be the real villain based on how he treated scar/Taka when they was growing up as cubs smh. Scar/Taka should’ve been chosen to be the next king in my opinion and he would’ve been the good guy.
We might find out for sure with the upcoming movie of muffasa’s back story
You cant use real life logic on a cartoon movie. If this was supposed to be based in reality there would be no movie
Who is Nala's father? Mufasa or Scar? They're the only male lions around Pride Rock
Scar is rightful king
this aged well
Me when you said scar would of eaten simba:👁👄👁🤮
Watch the new mufasa lion king trailer
Mufasa is the adopted one not scar
This theory could be connected to the upcoming Lion King prequel movie!
You know that The Lion King is not inspired from the real life.....
Well, no wonder some of the ladies were drawn to him from the audience.
I think it's it's a movie and people are digging way too much
We just having fun
@@cmoney6691 if you got that much time on your hands to dig into a movie you're totally taken away from the enjoyment of it
@@davidcaudill7779 not necessarily you could enjoy the movie so much that did you want to dig into it a little bit more and feel in some of the plot holes
Mufasa and scar .
Dorothy Anchondo.
University of Minnesota? Well, who am I to argue with my homestate?
It’s crazy that Mufasa is adopted in the new movie
I won't be watching it.
me neither. mufasa always will be related to scar for me@@FamilyHistoriandude
@@KyotoNightfrost yes there both brothers blood
How come Scar is Mufasa younger brother but he looks way older that Mufasa?
In the movie Scar only mentions that Mufasa is his big brother and not his older brother so big brother as in size??
Funny how lionesses actually prefer darker mane lions
If scar was less crazy then yeah
This is like Hamilton. So this would makes sense
Simba wouldn’t have even survived to even the intro because lioness will abandon a litter if either, all but one cub died, or there was only one cub.
In short, if he were to live at least a little longer, he would had to have siblings.
The reason why Scar has black mane he got it from his father
Disney portrayed scar the wrong if it was real life scar orobably would be king
It is called 🦁 King not
🦍 President .
1:58
Mufasa is king because he's the older brother. That's why.
Wow
I think you're right you just spoiled the whole plot of mufasa The Lion King. Live action prequel coming out this December. Mufasa was an orphan in the poster according to what it says. I think that's what Disney's going for with the live-action remake. Live-action remake is a realistic what would happen in real life.
The Lion King is a good movie
It makes sense that mufasa was genetically inferior even if you look at their parents True.Just look at scar he does have high levels of testosterone
The Lion King is based on storytelling and character development, and not real lion genetics.
There's no such thing as a "rightful king" in a pride. It gies by whichsoever lion is a better alpha male. Scar pretty much says this in The Lion King when Mufass comes to see why Scar wasn't at Simba's presentation.
Yes scar was rightful king
I was thinking that he was made King because he was older ,and the Cartoon movie was going by human nature instead of Lion nature.
👑🎩💎 go by age ,and 👔🧢💼 go by votes .
If your a King/Queen you live like this 🐩🐎🦢🌹🌺🍵🏰🏯🏸🏏🪭🪮👑.
If you are a
President/Prime Minister you most likely live like this
🐕🐐🦆🌻🌲🍉🍞
🥓🍔🍕🌭🍩🥧🍫🍭🏢⛲️
⚽️🏀🏈🥊🎮👟🪖.
Mufasa is older so he would be the rightful king....
That's not how it works in the real world for lions
in the real world for lions there is no kingdom to inherit @@whitedragonzerureusu4480
@@whitedragonzerureusu4480but it's just a Disney movie so it doesn't really matter
Mufasa was adopted btw...scar was the rightful king
mufasa was not adopted in this version its only in the new movie
So Zira was right Scar was the rightful king
Scar gee, DISNEY theories soooooo persisive.
i mean I hated muffassa thr holr time dont ask why just hate him
Noooooooooooooooooo
cartoon hater
Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees! 😆
You know its a movie right? 😂😂😂
Who made the movie again?
Disney? From? The west a.k.a the white land
Ofc they made the dark skin lose as the villain, of course
Nothing new here
Not just for lion
Even for human darker skin seems doing most stuff better
I am say this not because i have dark skin
Scar wasnt king because he was evil
He became that because of how he was treated. His real name is Taka which means dirt, there's a book about that
@@whitedragonzerureusu4480Those books are not canon. His real name isn’t Taka.
Birth order
You have a group of talking, sentient, lions with human intellect and this is what you get hung up on.
So doing educational videos on how things would of been in real life is trivial? Why are you getting so hung up on a video about a kids movie?