"The more you've shot, the less stable your stabilizer was stabilizing" should rival "The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't." You are a hidden gem Chieftain. *Salutes in Jar-head.*
@@obsidianjane4413 I was thinking about stowage on such a small vehicle. With only 12 rounds in the loader, 15 minutes may be about the max before they'd have to disengage to a covered position so the crew could crawl out and replenish the autoloader. If it's really hot, it may be much sooner.
@The Chieftain A French document from 1957 on the design of a future battle tank (which led to AMX-30) compared conventionnal and oscillating turrets, and the balance problem with the latter as the bustle ammo got fired was specifically mentionned yes.
Exactly the right video to watch whilst cutting my own video about the Saurer :) I can confirm that the Kürassier is "cozy" inside. And getting out of the drivers position is a challenge, on account of the housing for the big light beeing right over it. Edit: Thx for the comparison of the NATO and "French" 105 Ammo. Very interesting
Austria, a small nation, certainly got bang for their buck in terms of development with this particular tank. They tried out a bunch of ideas, to see what was worth developing in future tanks. I'm guessing they learned a lot. Plus it seems a serviceable tank in its own right for the era, despite its problems. Worst seems the gunner's position. Thanks Chieftain
I'd love to see Nick trying to put on a 2-part NBC suit in the gunner's seat. Hatch closed of course and mask on first. Since all serial versions lacked any NBC system, that's how it was done. Impossible for a guy of his height.
Obviously it's for driving through countries which have declared neutrality. For example, how else could the Germans have bypassed the Maginot Line?!? Sheesh! Read a few books and educate yourself!
The control panel made by AEG is funny to me. I know big corporations make electronics and circuits for many different markets, but to me, AEG primarily means a maker of vacuum cleaners and washing machines
Random fun fact: AEG is considered the first company to ever undergo a full corporate rebranding when they hired Peter Behrens as the world's first corporate designer, like Jony Ives. They're still using the logotype from back then! ...well, it's a fun fact for me.
AEG does not exist anymore; today it is a licensing brand for household goods. AEG could be compared to the american company General Electric and was active in nearly all kinds of electrics and electronics; even Telefunken was part of AEG.
I've been in AMX-13 Turret and a Retrofitted AMX-13 with SK105 Kuraisser Turret, i must say even for 5'9-5'10🐈 it's still kinda small, and I'm not even wide, it was better for 5'7 and below😂
I think this is where The Chieftain with a stoic look of resignation pulls out his sidearm, concluding that since death is inevitable, why spend the last moments of life breaking your body while burning up when a bullet can end it clean and simple?
It would make a great addition to the channel to find a way to stuff a Chieftain-sized dummy into all the extremely tight spaces. When we see things like knees about to get crushed, I'd love to see how badly that could end, but nobody wants to see the Chief ground up by a turret mechanism.
12:24 hmm maybe if we have the turret crew lay prone onside the turret ...not supine ... prone... lol i mean were running out of unconfortable postions to force people into lol
Short question: is it really "left trigger is coax, right trigger is main gun?" Cause on Leo2 both sides of the "stick" are redundant = both triggers will fire the chosen weapon. Main gun or coax.
Thanks for the info. I was wondering cause it is the Leo2 handle and the idea was to make it suitable to left- and right-handed ppl. (yeah, you can always wire the buttons differently) @@TheChieftainsHatch
@@TheChieftainsHatchHI i know possibly where come from T14 Armata A-85-3A engine X shape design he is the reintepretation of UTD 20 V6 from BMP1 engine, this engine have the exacts sames following charateristic : bank angle 120°, Cylinder bore 150mm , Fork and Blade design connecting rods by pins and Tunnel crankshaft. Make rearanged shape for x design make a new Tunnel crankshaft add one more Turbo and some minor changing and you obtain A-85-3A. Cutaway from the engine UTD 20: forum.chronomag.cz/uploads/post-39943-0-30498800-1579366315.jpg I am engineer in aeronautical in France in Toulouse this is not my language. Hope to help Up the message for is be seen.
@@TheChieftainsHatchHi Chieftain, i want know your opinion could 2s25 Sprut / Sprut SDM1 could be a cheap T14 Armata with remote operated turet seal front 3 crew compartment and put era from bmp3 on it like 2s38 with a era pack add on armor on it and be for urban terrain be sell like it "cheap T14 armata Isv ( Infantry support vehicle).Can he take BMP3 ERA on it? but the better would be to use this remote operated turret on a other chassis like bmp3 and that exactely the point of 2s38 57mm he is on bmp3 chassis is remote operated turret adapt the 125mm sprut turret on it close crew capsule put era of bmp3 on that work because he is a bmp3 chassis base in this case and you have a low cost t14armata more urban fighting assymetrical warfare that you can use or sold at export low cost easy and faster to manufactur and lower logistics easy. What is your opinion on it ?
should have implemented some kind of weight that moves rearward to the turret the more shots you have fired to compensate for the lack of weight caused by the spent shells. I am not an engineer nor do I have a lot of information about mechanics of oscillating turrets but that would seem like an obvious choice.
Super Kurassier... 0~o sounds so much like the title of the latest B-movie of the week at the local cinema. ^~^ (FRH) fire retardant hydraulic-fluid. Welcome to the 1600-club. ^~^
Now I don't know if the problems caused by the tilting of the top of the turret for the crew are suspected by the Chieftain or if this is a fact reported by the crews. I don't have any information on this, but as far as I can see the crew is sitting very close to the pivot point, so the real movement in this area should be very small. So maybe this is a theoretical problem.
When I was editing, I checked with Franz because I was suspicious that I hadn't misinterpreted the situation and wanted to avoid an embarrassing error. The response occasioned the subtitle which observed that gunners who didn't need to worry about their legs getting crushed still needed to worry about negligent discharges when extra force was added to their legs by the seat rotation.
This has to be the least person friendly turret ever built. All the kit that you would find in an M60 or Leopard 2 in the space afforded by an AMX 13. Crew optional.
I served as a crewman on the M60s, and I must say that I could comfortably reach and use all the controls and accessories, and did not have to worry about legs or feet getting crushed. The Kurassier was pretty poorly thought out in just about all crew safety and controls. The video is very interesting, and well put together.
Wait, the whole turret isnt like a capsule and the whole thing moves? You mean if the turret depresses the gunner controls would just press into your knees? Sooo, half of it moves, half of it doesnt? ooof. IDK why, but I always thought those oscillating turrets were like giant crew capsules not entirely unlike a B-17s ball turret and everything moved as one...
Hi Chieftain, i want know your opinion could 2s25 Sprut / Sprut SDM1 could be a cheap T14 Armata with remote operated turet seal front 3 crew compartment and put era from bmp3 on it like 2s38 with a era pack add on armor on it and be for urban terrain be sell like it "cheap T14 armata Isv ( Infantry support vehicle).Can he take BMP3 ERA on it?
most ERA (Especially the types designed to interfere with kinetic projectiles) requires a certain thickness of armor behind it, otherwise you'd just blow a hole in your own tank. the 2s25 is designed to be both amphibious and air mobile (Meaning that you can deploy it from a cargo plane on parachutes). Adding extra weight with ERA, or automation systems for the turret like you suggest, would compromise both of those abilities. Also, seating three crew in the hull of the 2s25 would not be possible, as the space to the left and right of the driver is taken up by fuel tanks.
@@fulgrimventris8506 Thanks you a lot for this informations for era i could agree but for remote operated turret i don't see anything that could go wrong or add-weight end for fuel tank you can put in another you have plenty of space in this vehicle but the better would be to use this remote operated turret on a other chassis like bmp3 and that exactely the point of 2s38 57mm he is on bmp3 chassis is remote operated turret adapt the 125mm sprut turret on it close crew capsule put era of bmp3 on that work because he is a bmp3 chassis base in this case and you have a low cost t14armata more urban fighting assymetrical warfare that you can use or sold at export low cost easy and faster to manufacturing and lower logistics easy. What is your opinion on it ?
SK 105 would be very helpful on Ukraine. 112 of these is still waiting in Belgium, but Austria do not want give permission. This is why I am wondering if Austria really care about european values or is just empty words for them. Is always very easy to talk.
Note to HR..... short dudes .....to be requisitionioned prior to issuance of vehicle.....in reality memo lost at bottom of pile...found after obsolescence of equipment...
Well, the Austrians might have procured either more M60 or surplus M48 and upgunned them to L7. This vehicle looks out of place against massive armored/artillery force the Soviets were employing.
Those 2 you mentioned are heavier, much more heavier. None of them is going to survive a well placed shoot from the contemporary. So logic is get one that's lighter that probably can traverse around stuff easier.
@@jintsuubest9331 Also 'Cozy' is going to be less 'gripping' on mountain roads, as found in much of Austria. And in any case the comparison is not really 'like for like', Kurassier is a light anti-armour system, not an MBT (that's what the M47/M60/Leopard 2 are for). Think Tank Destroyer, with protection against small-arms only.
Plot-twist! They did. The Austrians had M47's as their MBTs when the Kurassier arrived, then upgraded to M60 in 1982 and then to Leopard 2 Kurassier is a light anti-armour system, not an MBT. Think Tank Destroyer, with protection against small-arms only.
Why is the switch gear in this Austrian AFV labelled in English, not German? I suspect it’s because they stole/borrowed/bought so much of it from US vehicles.
Probably because the fire control stuff was out of a Leo? But this question made me think... I wasn't a tanker, i was in AAA and i can't remember the lables of the AA gun and radar system. Or which language they were in. We bought the AAA system from swiss manufacturer Oerlikon, but they sold it worldwide (the same AA gun i was trained on is what the argentinians managed to shoot down a Harrier in the Falkands war and damage another one. None of their aircraft managed to do that) With the usually low numbers of things austria bought and buys, my guess would be, the numbers are too low to get our own lableing made. So we most likely get what the majority of customers buy. Also, basically the lable language doesn't matter as you get trained on it anyways. You get trained to find and use any button, lever etc. wihtout looking and under stress, so the lables could be in chinese or windings. (I mean we got drilled into where in our lockers which item of clothing and equipment had to be so if there's alarm, and the base gets blacked out, you could pack your pack wihtout any light and know where everything was.)
@@nirfz thanks for responding. I suppose the switchgear stuck out to me, because it didn’t fit with the expectations I got from flying. In your cockpit, the gauges are probably going to be labelled in one of the official languages of your country. I assumed the same was true for the foot sloggers.
@@CAP198462 oficcial language 😂 Fun fact: We actually have 3 official languages over all, but locally differing: the whole country has german as official language, a few parts of the south additionally have slovene (for the slovene minority on carinthian soil that chose to stay with austria after WW1) and parts of the south east have german and croatian. (for the parts in dispute with hungary after WW1 that decided to stay with austria in a plebiscite in 1919) But i was quite surprised 20 years ago when i had to "check in" to the "hospital for accidents" in vienna when there were forms to fill out in: german, slovene, croatian, czech, slovak, hungarian, turkish, and a frew languages i wasn't able to decipher as quickly what they were. (there were 8 shelves so 8 different languages) And it was 2003 and not 1903...😁
The average Austrian is larger than the average Irish or American. So I'd assume there might have been a system where taller recruits were sent to the M47s and M60s, while the Kürrasiers received the smaller recruits.
@@chefchaudard3580 they shoehorned Arnold in the driver position of a standard Kurassier, there are photos. it's just how cozy you want your crew, I guess.
The tallest soldiers here in austria usually don't get put into small vehicles, those were always sent to the "guard". (a certain part of the infanters: The guys in "shiny" uniform who stand for hours at the airport in lines when a head of state arrives to show military honors.) And in other weaponries you have more space. I was in AAA and in both the gun and the radar i fit easily with 187cm and even one of buddies with 194 did so too. Also, while massively built evn in his age, Arnold S. isn't the tallest of guys. (as far as i remember he's around 180cm)
"The more you've shot, the less stable your stabilizer was stabilizing"
should rival
"The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't."
You are a hidden gem Chieftain.
*Salutes in Jar-head.*
Together with "inert, meaning not ert"
Chieftain you described the cramped quarters of the tank like real estate sales people describe a "small" home "Cozy"😂.
He's an Irish man, he'll sell you a bucking horse a "sprightly ", and a claustrophobic tank as "cosy".
related to the classic art of the British understatement. -30C? "It's a bit nipply..."
I use the phrase "It's tiny but it's cramped."
I believe the traditional estate agent phrase was "compact and bijou".
Only if it were a(much older) Panther it would bei cramped, claustrophobic and impossible to escape😂
All these oddities still make me appreciate the "copious" elbowroom in the M60.
And a hatch at the bottom to pi** out of, friend of mine said it's a godsend when nature calls. He was a tanker in the Austrian Army on the M60.
I'd never seen the French 105 and the L7 105 compared side by side before. Nice!
Still, 43 rounds onboard seems a lot.
@@petesheppard1709 IRL battles last longer than 15 minutes.
That indeed explained much of the AMX-10 "wheeled tank" in Ukraine an its unique 'almost 105mm but not really' ammo.
Girth matter, I guess.
@@obsidianjane4413 I was thinking about stowage on such a small vehicle. With only 12 rounds in the loader, 15 minutes may be about the max before they'd have to disengage to a covered position so the crew could crawl out and replenish the autoloader. If it's really hot, it may be much sooner.
@@petesheppard1709it's primarily an ambush vehicle and a lightly armoured one at that. If you use more than 12 rounds you're in deep shit anyway.
Seems like the right size tank for a high school tankery club.
Hahahaha !
And it's an autoloader. No need to have students magically manhandle 30 kg shells
Just remember not to paint it red and fly tall flags from masts while you're trying to sneak past other tanks.
@@SlinkyTWFhey that worked. Once.
@The Chieftain A French document from 1957 on the design of a future battle tank (which led to AMX-30) compared conventionnal and oscillating turrets, and the balance problem with the latter as the bustle ammo got fired was specifically mentionned yes.
What!?! A part 3?!? I want it and I want it now!!
Such a tease...
wow this is far more cramped than I expected!
New Chieftain !
Exactly the right video to watch whilst cutting my own video about the Saurer :) I can confirm that the Kürassier is "cozy" inside. And getting out of the drivers position is a challenge, on account of the housing for the big light beeing right over it.
Edit: Thx for the comparison of the NATO and "French" 105 Ammo. Very interesting
Austria, a small nation, certainly got bang for their buck in terms of development with this particular tank. They tried out a bunch of ideas, to see what was worth developing in future tanks. I'm guessing they learned a lot. Plus it seems a serviceable tank in its own right for the era, despite its problems. Worst seems the gunner's position. Thanks Chieftain
I'd love to see Nick trying to put on a 2-part NBC suit in the gunner's seat. Hatch closed of course and mask on first. Since all serial versions lacked any NBC system, that's how it was done. Impossible for a guy of his height.
Still more space than the condo I shared with my folks in Hawai'i. Practically luxurious by comparison.
True to form, the middle installment of a trilogy ends on a cliffhanger...
As long as we don't end up with part five in a trilogy of four, it's mostly harmless.
@@johanmetreus1268 Now, now; take a breath, look at the cover, and don't panic.
@@oldmangimp2468 such gentle letters do calm, better than an electric teaspoon.
You managed to fit in relatively well. Maybe age is indeed shrinking you down? If that is the case, we might see a Ha-Go video in roughly 20 years.
Nah, he's just getting better at folding himself in half 😂
In 25 he’ll fit the ELC AMX.
He needs a Mini Me.
It's always a treat when you upload a video!
We love the Chieftain in Bolivia. 💯
Super Cool Chieftain! I hope you make more tank gunsights footages in your next videos!
Thanks Nick
QUESTION In non neutral countries, why do their tanks have a neutral position in their gearboxes ?
Obviously it's for driving through countries which have declared neutrality. For example, how else could the Germans have bypassed the Maginot Line?!? Sheesh! Read a few books and educate yourself!
That in case the entire crew turns out to be a bunch of conscientious objectors.
The control panel made by AEG is funny to me. I know big corporations make electronics and circuits for many different markets, but to me, AEG primarily means a maker of vacuum cleaners and washing machines
Random fun fact: AEG is considered the first company to ever undergo a full corporate rebranding when they hired Peter Behrens as the world's first corporate designer, like Jony Ives. They're still using the logotype from back then!
...well, it's a fun fact for me.
Ausschalten - Einschalten - Geht
AEG does not exist anymore; today it is a licensing brand for household goods. AEG could be compared to the american company General Electric and was active in nearly all kinds of electrics and electronics; even Telefunken was part of AEG.
Listening to this in the background to get the old vibes :) "World of Tanks || Video Soundtrack - Inside the Chieftain's Hatch"
0:28 ohh so were are now doing a "will Chieftain fit" video? lol
5:45 gods i hope that cranks a big ol sping so you can do it before hand lol else that sounds like a nightmare
I've been in AMX-13 Turret and a Retrofitted AMX-13 with SK105 Kuraisser Turret, i must say even for 5'9-5'10🐈 it's still kinda small, and I'm not even wide, it was better for 5'7 and below😂
Am I going to have to wait for “ help my tanks on fire “ ? 😂😂
Oui.
I think this is where The Chieftain with a stoic look of resignation pulls out his sidearm, concluding that since death is inevitable, why spend the last moments of life breaking your body while burning up when a bullet can end it clean and simple?
Would be fun to try running camera for you on these.
No armor museums here in Nashville though.
So much broll to take and i love shooting broll
I am extremely sad that "grab the gopro and go inside" wasn't followed by action shots of the same, accompanied by appropriate levels of swearing.
I recon you should do a inside the hatch on the Aussie M113 MRV I recon that will be a interesting one
Mate, you mean the one with the Scorpion Turret? Or the original one with the Saladin turret.
From Perth. 🦈
It would make a great addition to the channel to find a way to stuff a Chieftain-sized dummy into all the extremely tight spaces. When we see things like knees about to get crushed, I'd love to see how badly that could end, but nobody wants to see the Chief ground up by a turret mechanism.
12:24 hmm maybe if we have the turret crew lay prone onside the turret ...not supine ... prone... lol i mean were running out of unconfortable postions to force people into lol
Thanks for this an very interesting vehicle
Franz is photobombing!
"As you know, HEAT rounds don't like spinning..." You over estimate what I know.😁
Spinning HEAT is what killed the kranvagn EMIL.
Making us wait for a part 3..... dirty
O dang, you where in my home town...
5 bucks says the first short guy gunner that had the unintended effect of discharging the 105 had some really angry everybody around him.
"Oopsie"
need to get one of those 360 cameras they have that let yo yumake 360 youtube videos so you can doument the entire compartment in one go :)
Do the Insta360's work in the tight quarters of a tank??
This tank made me want to start drinking again!
Initially the AMX 13 is it based on was made for small size tankers, the Chieftain is too big for that tank.
I've never understood why oscillating turrets were pursued at all, do you have any videos touching on this?
Autoloaders weren't as reliable back then, as they kept having trouble aligning the shell with the breech
Please please do the sdkfz 222 at the museum on ft. Benning!❤
Last i checked, they didn’t have one. The 222s are in Hudson, MA, Weald Foundation in UK and Kubinka, Russia.
Short question: is it really "left trigger is coax, right trigger is main gun?" Cause on Leo2 both sides of the "stick" are redundant = both triggers will fire the chosen weapon. Main gun or coax.
In this case, apparently. It would not be the only tank to have asymmetric triggers.
Thanks for the info. I was wondering cause it is the Leo2 handle and the idea was to make it suitable to left- and right-handed ppl. (yeah, you can always wire the buttons differently) @@TheChieftainsHatch
when your elevating the gun, isn't that when you'll get your knees crushed? As your behind the gun pivot point correct?
No. The hatches are behind the pivot point, but your knees would be foreword of it.
Hey chieftain.
Did you have links referencing to the various slide show on your "future combat vehicle design" video?
Not really. They aren't classified, but the link was only valid for registered attendees, so I'm a little reluctant to make freely available
@@TheChieftainsHatchHI i know possibly where come from T14 Armata A-85-3A engine X shape design he is the reintepretation of UTD 20 V6 from BMP1 engine, this engine have the exacts sames following charateristic : bank angle 120°, Cylinder bore 150mm , Fork and Blade design connecting rods by pins and Tunnel crankshaft. Make rearanged shape for x design make a new Tunnel crankshaft add one more Turbo and some minor changing and you obtain A-85-3A. Cutaway from the engine UTD 20: forum.chronomag.cz/uploads/post-39943-0-30498800-1579366315.jpg I am engineer in aeronautical in France in Toulouse this is not my language. Hope to help Up the message for is be seen.
@@TheChieftainsHatchHi Chieftain, i want know your opinion could 2s25 Sprut / Sprut SDM1 could be a cheap T14 Armata with remote operated turet seal front 3 crew compartment and put era from bmp3 on it like 2s38 with a era pack add on armor on it and be for urban terrain be sell like it "cheap T14 armata Isv ( Infantry support vehicle).Can he take BMP3 ERA on it? but the better would be to use this remote operated turret on a other chassis like bmp3 and that exactely the point of 2s38 57mm he is on bmp3 chassis is remote operated turret adapt the 125mm sprut turret on it close crew capsule put era of bmp3 on that work because he is a bmp3 chassis base in this case and you have a low cost t14armata more urban fighting assymetrical warfare that you can use or sold at export low cost easy and faster to manufactur and lower logistics easy. What is your opinion on it ?
should have implemented some kind of weight that moves rearward to the turret the more shots you have fired to compensate for the lack of weight caused by the spent shells. I am not an engineer nor do I have a lot of information about mechanics of oscillating turrets but that would seem like an obvious choice.
Problem is where would you put it, the turret is already real "cozy"
@@biomike01 my thought exactly. Good idea *if we had the space to do that*.
A big fat solid block+motors+rails.
@@biomike01 a moving piece of armor plate outside could do the trick
Wait, am i THIS early? wow, well, thanks for another awesome video, Chieftain!
Super Kurassier... 0~o sounds so much like the title of the latest B-movie of the week at the local cinema. ^~^ (FRH) fire retardant hydraulic-fluid. Welcome to the 1600-club. ^~^
Now I don't know if the problems caused by the tilting of the top of the turret for the crew are suspected by the Chieftain or if this is a fact reported by the crews.
I don't have any information on this, but as far as I can see the crew is sitting very close to the pivot point, so the real movement in this area should be very small.
So maybe this is a theoretical problem.
When I was editing, I checked with Franz because I was suspicious that I hadn't misinterpreted the situation and wanted to avoid an embarrassing error. The response occasioned the subtitle which observed that gunners who didn't need to worry about their legs getting crushed still needed to worry about negligent discharges when extra force was added to their legs by the seat rotation.
@@TheChieftainsHatch _negligent discharges_
nice😁
This has to be the least person friendly turret ever built. All the kit that you would find in an M60 or Leopard 2 in the space afforded by an AMX 13. Crew optional.
TO get the extra ammo you need to have a hook on a stick.
So, the perfect tank for the Republic of Oompa-Loompa!
Just waiting for "oh bugger the Tank's on Fire"
I served as a crewman on the M60s, and I must say that I could comfortably reach and use all the controls and accessories, and did not have to worry about legs or feet getting crushed. The Kurassier was pretty poorly thought out in just about all crew safety and controls. The video is very interesting, and well put together.
Wait, the whole turret isnt like a capsule and the whole thing moves? You mean if the turret depresses the gunner controls would just press into your knees? Sooo, half of it moves, half of it doesnt? ooof. IDK why, but I always thought those oscillating turrets were like giant crew capsules not entirely unlike a B-17s ball turret and everything moved as one...
damn it nick.
If you put me in that tank I'd start screaming after about 5 minutes! And that's without two other people in there.
If an army built tanks designed around guys the size of The Chieftain they’d look like something out of Warhammer…
can you talk to the people at war-gaming to make a mill dot gun sight for there tanks
Greetings form the Old Country, Nicholas ! How is the Master's Degree coming along ?
Start module 10 of 12 on Monday. The last two are Thesis related
Inter-pupillary distance control - if I had a dime for every time I heard THAT
'Cozy'...and that's an empty tank! Not to mention the bulk of uniform and personal gear.
Hi Chieftain, i want know your opinion could 2s25 Sprut / Sprut SDM1 could be a cheap T14 Armata with remote operated turet seal front 3 crew compartment and put era from bmp3 on it like 2s38 with a era pack add on armor on it and be for urban terrain be sell like it "cheap T14 armata Isv ( Infantry support vehicle).Can he take BMP3 ERA on it?
most ERA (Especially the types designed to interfere with kinetic projectiles) requires a certain thickness of armor behind it, otherwise you'd just blow a hole in your own tank. the 2s25 is designed to be both amphibious and air mobile (Meaning that you can deploy it from a cargo plane on parachutes). Adding extra weight with ERA, or automation systems for the turret like you suggest, would compromise both of those abilities.
Also, seating three crew in the hull of the 2s25 would not be possible, as the space to the left and right of the driver is taken up by fuel tanks.
@@fulgrimventris8506 Thanks you a lot for this informations for era i could agree but for remote operated turret i don't see anything that could go wrong or add-weight end for fuel tank you can put in another you have plenty of space in this vehicle but the better would be to use this remote operated turret on a other chassis like bmp3 and that exactely the point of 2s38 57mm he is on bmp3 chassis is remote operated turret adapt the 125mm sprut turret on it close crew capsule put era of bmp3 on that work because he is a bmp3 chassis base in this case and you have a low cost t14armata more urban fighting assymetrical warfare that you can use or sold at export low cost easy and faster to manufacturing and lower logistics easy. What is your opinion on it ?
shoigu on youtube with a burner account doing his own arms research because MoD is clueless 👌
@@Chaosrain112 I don't really understand english is not my language 🤔 or what can you think of what i said earlier?
SK 105 would be very helpful on Ukraine. 112 of these is still waiting in Belgium, but Austria do not want give permission. This is why I am wondering if Austria really care about european values or is just empty words for them. Is always very easy to talk.
It should be redesignated as the M1-Uncomfortable. Just as a sidepoke to Perun.
Arinie was a tank driver
Just goes to show that Irish are built different
🔥
Some turrets are roomy, some are cramped and then there’s this.
Note to HR..... short dudes .....to be requisitionioned prior to issuance of vehicle.....in reality memo lost at bottom of pile...found after obsolescence of equipment...
Dear lord that's cramped.
Its just like in war thunder! 2:50
You shoot up your ammo and if you survive you head back to the rear to change ammo boxes.
"The less stable, your stabiliser, was stabilising"
I am the poet of my time.
Hopefully training accidents for oscillating turrets were low. The inside of the looks dangerous in this video.
9:20 ether that or you have some shoe mounted hook or bare feet lol
they might have made it, with the philosopy of tanker shouldn´t be more then 5 feet long.
Spent most of the video trying to figure out what FRH was.
Well, the Austrians might have procured either more M60 or surplus M48 and upgunned them to L7. This vehicle looks out of place against massive armored/artillery force the Soviets were employing.
Those 2 you mentioned are heavier, much more heavier.
None of them is going to survive a well placed shoot from the contemporary. So logic is get one that's lighter that probably can traverse around stuff easier.
@@jintsuubest9331 Also 'Cozy' is going to be less 'gripping' on mountain roads, as found in much of Austria. And in any case the comparison is not really 'like for like', Kurassier is a light anti-armour system, not an MBT (that's what the M47/M60/Leopard 2 are for). Think Tank Destroyer, with protection against small-arms only.
Plot-twist! They did.
The Austrians had M47's as their MBTs when the Kurassier arrived, then upgraded to M60 in 1982 and then to Leopard 2
Kurassier is a light anti-armour system, not an MBT. Think Tank Destroyer, with protection against small-arms only.
It's called a Jagdpanzer - tank destroyer for a reason. Think of all the other ones fron WWII, none offered the protection of a medium or heavy tank.
It's a bit **** I think is the takeaway?
Coming from a abrams . do these systems feel ridiculous to u?
ah I now see why oscilating turrets are kind of terrible
If basically anybody else didn't use an oscillating turret in a 'service' vehicle, while some prototypes were tried, it's indeed a sign.
Why is the switch gear in this Austrian AFV labelled in English, not German?
I suspect it’s because they stole/borrowed/bought so much of it from US vehicles.
Probably because the fire control stuff was out of a Leo?
But this question made me think... I wasn't a tanker, i was in AAA and i can't remember the lables of the AA gun and radar system. Or which language they were in.
We bought the AAA system from swiss manufacturer Oerlikon, but they sold it worldwide (the same AA gun i was trained on is what the argentinians managed to shoot down a Harrier in the Falkands war and damage another one. None of their aircraft managed to do that)
With the usually low numbers of things austria bought and buys, my guess would be, the numbers are too low to get our own lableing made.
So we most likely get what the majority of customers buy.
Also, basically the lable language doesn't matter as you get trained on it anyways. You get trained to find and use any button, lever etc. wihtout looking and under stress, so the lables could be in chinese or windings.
(I mean we got drilled into where in our lockers which item of clothing and equipment had to be so if there's alarm, and the base gets blacked out, you could pack your pack wihtout any light and know where everything was.)
@@nirfz thanks for responding. I suppose the switchgear stuck out to me, because it didn’t fit with the expectations I got from flying. In your cockpit, the gauges are probably going to be labelled in one of the official languages of your country. I assumed the same was true for the foot sloggers.
@@CAP198462 oficcial language 😂 Fun fact: We actually have 3 official languages over all, but locally differing: the whole country has german as official language, a few parts of the south additionally have slovene (for the slovene minority on carinthian soil that chose to stay with austria after WW1) and parts of the south east have german and croatian. (for the parts in dispute with hungary after WW1 that decided to stay with austria in a plebiscite in 1919)
But i was quite surprised 20 years ago when i had to "check in" to the "hospital for accidents" in vienna when there were forms to fill out in: german, slovene, croatian, czech, slovak, hungarian, turkish, and a frew languages i wasn't able to decipher as quickly what they were. (there were 8 shelves so 8 different languages)
And it was 2003 and not 1903...😁
-6 is not very much. As a War Thunder enjoyer, I can tell you this hurts.
It looks pretty horrible inside, like it makes a T series tank look nice.
25th, 2 September 2023
A tank made to little men, it can not handle a properly fed man.
The way the turret moves has to be the dumbest thing I have ever seen.
Tiny little Austrians, apparently.
The average Austrian is larger than the average Irish or American.
So I'd assume there might have been a system where taller recruits were sent to the M47s and M60s, while the Kürrasiers received the smaller recruits.
Unlike Arnold Schwarzenegger , you mean?
@@chefchaudard3580 they shoehorned Arnold in the driver position of a standard Kurassier, there are photos. it's just how cozy you want your crew, I guess.
The tallest soldiers here in austria usually don't get put into small vehicles, those were always sent to the "guard". (a certain part of the infanters: The guys in "shiny" uniform who stand for hours at the airport in lines when a head of state arrives to show military honors.)
And in other weaponries you have more space. I was in AAA and in both the gun and the radar i fit easily with 187cm and even one of buddies with 194 did so too.
Also, while massively built evn in his age, Arnold S. isn't the tallest of guys. (as far as i remember he's around 180cm)
You;re still too tall for tank service
No way I would go to war in that.
No, you would drive or be driven...
One of terrible turrets i seen