the biggest robbery in rugby history, why play this world cup if south africa has to win at any cost ,france was the best team and ref refuse try for france who should have stand
With video today, such a scandal could not normally occur. The 16th Springbok was the referee. What a shame ! How can this be called a victory? Poor French team literally robbed against South Africa in 1995. It seems that in sport France is the subject of special treatment from the referees. I remember this famous France-Germany football World Cup semi- final match in 1982 in Seville... All this is very ugly.
World Rugby has unfortunately demonstrated that France was indeed disadvantaged by the referee. And the AI noted even more refereeing errors. There is indeed a system that is not healthy. South Africa's victory is not clean because of the referee.
I've seen Abdelatif Benzzi in a bar (and I'm sure, he's no drink alcool). But I've ask to this guy? Had ou make a try. He said yes , without hesitation. South Africa has to win this tournement. It was a lightseing in the all World. I'm french....
Ruben Krueger admitted himself he never scored. And 4 tries for the french team, all refused. Referee awarded with a $30.000 watch. All NZ poisoned before the final. Significant number of premature death of former SA players. What the hell
@@strugglingabit There is no source that I can find. Seen a couple references to this and the situation seems to be that the captain of the 95 French side claimed in an interview that Kruger admitted he didn't score in a memoir/book that does not appear to exist.
Several sources are available including a testimony from Mandela's personal security guard about the AB poisoning. There are also multiple counts of the ref receiving this $30000 watch during the reception after the final by an RSA official.just Google it...pure bribery.
The watch wasn't that expensive and seemed more like a gloating thing from a prick like Luyt than actual blatant bribery, which the referee refused and was disgusted by.
The invisible wall... That's how you call the referee? In 1995 that was decided that Springbok should have won in the name of Mandela... In the same way as AB has won in 2011 in New Zealand, McCaw should have been thrown more than once as he spent half of the time offside... Anyway, that's gone.
I've seen a lot of comments since SAs last win against France referring to this game. There is no way that anyone can say that it was a try. The second camera angle (4:28) clearly shows that he was short of the line.
Please do not soil the memories of two great clashes between those two great rugby union nations with footy-style whining about officials. The other night's QF was a classic between the two greatest teams on the planet. It was the greatest ever match in RWC history. The 1995 battle is legendary simply because it went ahead. Let us celebrate that. I was privileged to have been in SA supporting England back in 1995. The whole Madiba factor was indeed magical.
@@ulfibonkers3205 Be real. The whole "Madiba factor" was essentially an enormous pressure on IRB, referees and opposition teams. In 1995, SA pressured the ref and France to delay the match in Durban storm. If the match was cancelled, it would have been "match lost for SA" as SA was behind France in the discipline ranking. The result: 3 tries disallowed for France, 1 "try" scored by Krueger who later admitted he didn't score the try in his biography.... And i won't talk about the food poisoning of the All blacks or Bevan who received a golden watch by SARU president, prompting the all blacks to quit the post-final reception. History never forgets. France and South Africa are 2 great rugby nations, the sunday match was superb, but you won't make forget France was the side who suffered the most unfair calls in rugby world cup history. You wont. For France, it's not about whining, it's about to stop being naive, polite and politically-correct with World Rugby and be much more influent in World rugby organisation. Being one of the major force of rugby, France is literally absent from WR board, council, ref comissions. Something needs to change, or the same shit will repeat itself in 2027.
Fair play to both of these manly sides for playing in atrocious conditions in Natal that afternoon. Respect. RIP Messrs Christie, Kruger, vd Westhuizen, Small, and Williams. Eternal power to you all and admiration from this England rugby union fan
Derrick Bevan chose to be courageous, when the other option was to be... well... courageous in calling the match off. The historical nature of what was unfolding made his mind up for him.
@@patrickjackman8688 it would have been a decision that would have damaged the sport irreparably. And it would have been the right one, too. Those conditions were seriously dangerous. Oh well.
Same, as an England fan I had tix for both semis, 3 place match and the final. I bought my tix in a package and was at all England games plus the final and this semi. Remarkable that it was ever played
Ok, France loose the semil final at the 95 RWC, SA won with the help of Zeus and the referee. It was shame, Benazi try was fair.. But as Benazi said himself ,the loose is not so important as South Africa be united, after all the apartheid the awful era in South Africa History. It was a politic WWC, its true but sometimes politic is more important as the sport, and I really think it was really important that SA won the RWC in name of the birth of a new beautiful new nation. Long life to the the Rainbow nation...an beautiful example for all Nation in the world. All my admiration for the SA rugby team Congratulations. 🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦🌈🌈🌈🏆🏆🏆 (From a french fan sad and bitter writing with a poor english)🇫🇷
is that a match with corruption and politic amazing they robbed france team to let south africa won.. sport and the values didn't exist, the referee wanted to cancel the match but with that cancel south africa was match lost so they decided to keep the match played...and the referee had a beautiful gold watch to say to him : eh guy thanks for the match!!!!! shame on him and the politic in sport!!!
Such an unconvincing victory remains a questionable victory for eternity. To win thanks to a controversial act of play is to win without glory. It is better to lose with style than to win by arousing eternal distrust. It's sad for South Africa, a great rugby country, but unfortunately its victory is not an indisputable victory. In any case, true rugby fans will not keep lasting memories of this World Cup. South Africa would have been more than capable of competing in the World Cup without the help of referees.
You cheated admit it. This is just a propaganda video trying to justify what happened. You remind me of many South African supporters graceless in victory and disrespectful in defeat.
![ตีสิบเดย์ [FULL] | อาจารย์โอเล่ ญาณสัมผัส ผ่าดวงคนดัง ประเทศไทยจะเป็นยังไงหลังจากนี้!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/gszT2O76fL4/mqdefault.jpg)
the biggest robbery in rugby history, why play this world cup if south africa has to win at any cost ,france was the best team and ref refuse try for france who should have stand
All these years and you are still salty. You must be devastated after the last match between these two teams. Loser.
With video today, such a scandal could not normally occur. The 16th Springbok was the referee. What a shame ! How can this be called a victory? Poor French team literally robbed against South Africa in 1995. It seems that in sport France is the subject of special treatment from the referees. I remember this famous France-Germany football World Cup semi- final match in 1982 in Seville... All this is very ugly.
Happened exactly the same yesterday !
point unproved last night
World Rugby has unfortunately demonstrated that France was indeed disadvantaged by the referee. And the AI noted even more refereeing errors. There is indeed a system that is not healthy. South Africa's victory is not clean because of the referee.
French tears... so salty
Quel vol ce match
I've seen Abdelatif Benzzi in a bar (and I'm sure, he's no drink alcool). But I've ask to this guy? Had ou make a try. He said yes , without hesitation. South Africa has to win this tournement. It was a lightseing in the all World. I'm french....
Kruger also scored a try in the final, but it was disallowed because the ref didn't see the grounding. That's how things were back then.
Daylight robbery to the French! Sorry but try was in...the ref was a absolute disgrace all along the game
France had to win this match but as it is not an Anglo-Saxon country, ... it must lose
And with all the others world cup including 2023 it seems that the advantage of an home world cup only advantage countries from the Commonwelth
The biggest joke in the rugby history. France should have won this game.
Ruben Krueger admitted himself he never scored.
And 4 tries for the french team, all refused.
Referee awarded with a $30.000 watch.
All NZ poisoned before the final.
Significant number of premature death of former SA players.
What the hell
Source?
@@strugglingabit There is no source that I can find. Seen a couple references to this and the situation seems to be that the captain of the 95 French side claimed in an interview that Kruger admitted he didn't score in a memoir/book that does not appear to exist.
Ruben Kruger wrote a book just before he died he confess he never scored his try all the rest are facts@@strugglingabit
Several sources are available including a testimony from Mandela's personal security guard about the AB poisoning. There are also multiple counts of the ref receiving this $30000 watch during the reception after the final by an RSA official.just Google it...pure bribery.
The watch wasn't that expensive and seemed more like a gloating thing from a prick like Luyt than actual blatant bribery, which the referee refused and was disgusted by.
The invisible wall... That's how you call the referee? In 1995 that was decided that Springbok should have won in the name of Mandela... In the same way as AB has won in 2011 in New Zealand, McCaw should have been thrown more than once as he spent half of the time offside... Anyway, that's gone.
McCaw the offside king
And it happened again!
I've seen a lot of comments since SAs last win against France referring to this game. There is no way that anyone can say that it was a try. The second camera angle (4:28) clearly shows that he was short of the line.
Please do not soil the memories of two great clashes between those two great rugby union nations with footy-style whining about officials. The other night's QF was a classic between the two greatest teams on the planet. It was the greatest ever match in RWC history. The 1995 battle is legendary simply because it went ahead. Let us celebrate that. I was privileged to have been in SA supporting England back in 1995. The whole Madiba factor was indeed magical.
@@ulfibonkers3205 Be real. The whole "Madiba factor" was essentially an enormous pressure on IRB, referees and opposition teams.
In 1995, SA pressured the ref and France to delay the match in Durban storm. If the match was cancelled, it would have been "match lost for SA" as SA was behind France in the discipline ranking. The result: 3 tries disallowed for France, 1 "try" scored by Krueger who later admitted he didn't score the try in his biography.... And i won't talk about the food poisoning of the All blacks or Bevan who received a golden watch by SARU president, prompting the all blacks to quit the post-final reception. History never forgets.
France and South Africa are 2 great rugby nations, the sunday match was superb, but you won't make forget France was the side who suffered the most unfair calls in rugby world cup history. You wont. For France, it's not about whining, it's about to stop being naive, polite and politically-correct with World Rugby and be much more influent in World rugby organisation. Being one of the major force of rugby, France is literally absent from WR board, council, ref comissions. Something needs to change, or the same shit will repeat itself in 2027.
I wonder wot the present TMOs would have to say about that near French try.
It’s hard to see without modern equipment. There’s a pile of bodies on the try line.
Fair play to both of these manly sides for playing in atrocious conditions in Natal that afternoon. Respect. RIP Messrs Christie, Kruger, vd Westhuizen, Small, and Williams. Eternal power to you all and admiration from this England rugby union fan
One of the greatest RUGBY WORLD CUP GAMES, EVER- AB SUPPORTER 👍
Derrick Bevan chose to be courageous, when the other option was to be... well... courageous in calling the match off. The historical nature of what was unfolding made his mind up for him.
Can almost see it in his eyes in the footage. He isn’t comfortable with allowing the game to go ahead.
@@patrickjackman8688 it would have been a decision that would have damaged the sport irreparably. And it would have been the right one, too. Those conditions were seriously dangerous. Oh well.
I was at that game - soaked and stoked
Same, as an England fan I had tix for both semis, 3 place match and the final. I bought my tix in a package and was at all England games plus the final and this semi. Remarkable that it was ever played
Ok, France loose the semil final at the 95 RWC, SA won with the help of Zeus and the referee. It was shame, Benazi try was fair..
But as Benazi said himself ,the loose is not so important as South Africa be united, after all the apartheid the awful era in South Africa History.
It was a politic WWC, its true but sometimes politic is more important as the sport, and I really think it was really important that SA won the RWC in name of the birth of a new beautiful new nation.
Long life to the the Rainbow nation...an beautiful example for all Nation in the world.
All my admiration for the SA rugby team
Congratulations.
🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦🌈🌈🌈🏆🏆🏆
(From a french fan sad and bitter writing with a poor english)🇫🇷
The ref got a hublot watch offered by SA after the game
is that a match with corruption and politic amazing they robbed france team to let south africa won.. sport and the values didn't exist, the referee wanted to cancel the match but with that cancel south africa was match lost so they decided to keep the match played...and the referee had a beautiful gold watch to say to him : eh guy thanks for the match!!!!! shame on him and the politic in sport!!!
A great « invisible » robbery !
Bribing, poisoning, cheating, Bokke …shaming the sport ever since
France 11 made a push which resulted in the boks not catching the ball and Benazzi gained the ball
Such an unconvincing victory remains a questionable victory for eternity. To win thanks to a controversial act of play is to win without glory. It is better to lose with style than to win by arousing eternal distrust. It's sad for South Africa, a great rugby country, but unfortunately its victory is not an indisputable victory. In any case, true rugby fans will not keep lasting memories of this World Cup. South Africa would have been more than capable of competing in the World Cup without the help of referees.
Politic won that day!
Une belle anarque oui
france 3 rwc finals appearance, still have to register 1st win, maybe 2023? time will tell
No they won't. Again fucked by referee decisions. We're so tired to speak about this shit....
ta eu ta réponse, rebelote!
Rest in peace Joost van der Westhuizen.
Ce sport est beau mais corrompu.
Je ne regarderai pas la finale samedi et plus le 6 nations.
Honteux
la revanche sera belle.
Before Bernard Hinault, never a guy (winning le tour de France), after 60
Simply one of the most dishonest games of rugby ever played. Then they poisoned the All Black team....
Can't see why a knockout game at the WC can't be played one or two or three days later??
No creatin world in the north...juste forbidden..
This video is south African propaganda
Une belle arnaque
YOU LOST , GET OVER IT ,
You cheated admit it.
This is just a propaganda video trying to justify what happened.
You remind me of many South African supporters graceless in victory and disrespectful in defeat.