Fuji GW690III Professional - the Texas Leica.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.ย. 2024
  • Thank you for watching!
    Socials/Contact: linktr.ee/phil...
    Prints now available: philknall.darkr...
    (let me know in case you have an image you want to have added!
    Music:
    Dawn, Embrace by Sappheiros: / sappheirosmusic
    Affiliate Links:
    ZV-1: amzn.to/3n7x6T2
    Smallrig grip for ZV-1: amzn.to/3LzYx22
    Sony a7c: amzn.to/3Qt5qBc
    Hollyland Lark M microphones: amzn.to/3YSRWTa
    My talking head lens: amzn.to/3SGErUy
    My walk about lens: amzn.to/3vS993B
    Hakuba Stripe Strap: amzn.to/2ZQIwfX
    My favorite film cameras:
    Fuji GW690 on Ebay: ebay.us/rhKDZM
    Fuji GS645 on Ebay: ebay.us/IONlqe
    Leitz Minolta CL on Ebay: ebay.us/Z5WiUf

ความคิดเห็น • 32

  • @Narsuitus
    @Narsuitus ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Over the decades, I have used 6x6, 6x7, 6x9, and 6x12cm medium format film cameras. I have never tried 645.
    I have medium format rangefinders, SLRs, folding cameras, and view cameras.
    For general subjects, the 6x6 square image was my favorite until I tried 6x7.
    For landscapes, the 6x9 is my favorite.
    I use my Fuji GSW690 medium format rangefinder with fixed 65mm wide-angle for group portraits, environmental portraits, architecture, landscapes, and scenics.
    I use my Fuji GW670 medium format rangefinder with fixed 90mm normal lens for full-length portraits, ¾ length portraits, environmental portraits, and general subjects.

    • @PhilKnall
      @PhilKnall  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for the comment! I think because I started with 135 film and then shot digital for a while, I never quite warmed up to the square format. Even 6x7 felt too square for me a lot of the time. 6x9, or maybe 6x8 at most, feels the most natural to me.

  • @tinpl8r
    @tinpl8r ปีที่แล้ว

    I have used many different versions of this camera. And currently have the GSW690iii and the GW670iii. Love them both!

    • @PhilKnall
      @PhilKnall  ปีที่แล้ว

      I'd love to try the GSW! These cameras were truly great.

    • @tinpl8r
      @tinpl8r ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@PhilKnall had the gsw690ii at a great price. Sold it for a decent price but missed it then had to pay a premium for the gsw690iii. But totally worth it

    • @PhilKnall
      @PhilKnall  ปีที่แล้ว

      Sounds like my experience, i bought my first gw690iii cheap and was foolish enough to sell it!

    • @mahdimanesh4221
      @mahdimanesh4221 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Any recommendation on which version to get? I like the metal look of the mk2 better than the mk3… and I do not find major differences on paper 😅

  • @SteveBrokaw
    @SteveBrokaw ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice review. I love mine!

    • @PhilKnall
      @PhilKnall  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Steve! Truly an awesome camera.

  • @robdixon5016
    @robdixon5016 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have a GSW690iii, love it and I using it again this weekend. Great video!

    • @PhilKnall
      @PhilKnall  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you for the comment! There something really special about these cameras isn't there.

  • @petergoodrum1607
    @petergoodrum1607 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great vid... You didn't mention the shutter counter. From memory of having one it goes up to 9999 at which point the shutter neads servicing or it will potentially be off in terms of speeds etc. Fuji recommends. When I bought mine if figured that at a count of 4500 the shutter would either be half way through its service life or ragged from not being serviced. Fortunately when it arrived from a returns accepted Japanese Ebayer it was good. When I used it for the second time I hiked miles and shot some landscapes. I got to the end of the roll and found I'd left the lens cap on. I was so annoyed that I vowed never to do it again. I kept to my word I sold it straight away!

    • @PhilKnall
      @PhilKnall  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for the added info! Yup, been there done that... unfortunately that's an issue that is bound to happen with most rangefinders. But I love them too much, can't let a few rolls of wasted film deter me 😂

  • @TheIrishfitter
    @TheIrishfitter 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is excellent

    • @PhilKnall
      @PhilKnall  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you!

  • @Kerberos2233
    @Kerberos2233 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Even though the version 3 has plastic outer parts, it is still heavier than the version 2. The difference is only 35 grams though

    • @PhilKnall
      @PhilKnall  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Really?? I could've sworn it felt much heavier. Thanks for pointing it out.

    • @mateo89fl
      @mateo89fl 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@PhilKnall the version III outer case is not plastic, it is metal with a rubberized coating. That's why it's not lighter than the II

  • @marco_renard
    @marco_renard ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You bring out some excellent points!
    Our conversation on Instagram definitely influenced me getting one 😂
    Do you ever use it on a tripod ? I am looking for one and a good L bracket, so I'd love to hear if you have any recommendations.
    I saw you had a Olympus XA, it's actually the camera I'd love to pair with my 690 to travel !

    • @PhilKnall
      @PhilKnall  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi! Thanks for watching. Sorry to say but that's not my area of expertise.. i use a tripod for video but never for photography. The one i use for video is a K&F Carbon one.

    • @marco_renard
      @marco_renard ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@PhilKnall Alright no problem ! Thanks for replying man :)

  • @quite1enough
    @quite1enough ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really wanted to try 6x8 version, but it's nowhere to find now and the prices is just ouch (not to mention that delivery to my region is borderline impossible right now).

    • @PhilKnall
      @PhilKnall  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, 6:8 is a really pleasing crop too, I've looked at those as well but as you said they're rare and expensive. Good thing is they're the same camera aside from the aspect ratio, so it's easy to just crop the pictures.

  • @stampydragon2739
    @stampydragon2739 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How is the iso set

    • @PhilKnall
      @PhilKnall  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There is no meter in this camera so there's no setting for ISO.

  • @Alhemund
    @Alhemund 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Greaat MF camera!!

    • @PhilKnall
      @PhilKnall  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agreed! Thanks for watching!

  • @simbatv7328
    @simbatv7328 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    what film did you use?

    • @PhilKnall
      @PhilKnall  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Do you have a specific photo you want to know? Most of them are on lomography color negative 400

    • @simbatv7328
      @simbatv7328 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@PhilKnall Thank you!!

  • @jackmlynek8817
    @jackmlynek8817 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Seriously, stop calling it the "Texas" Leica. Texas is so small you could drop it into Ontario and still have over 100,000 sq miles left over. Texas may be big in the US, but it's not much in Canada. Get over yourselves.

    • @PhilKnall
      @PhilKnall  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'm not even from the US 😂 I think it's more referring to the stereotype that everying *in* Texas is big - the trucks, the steaks, the guns etc. I didn't coin it 🤷
      ( I'll take Ontario over Texas any day too!)