Grail Country with Jordan Hall Part 1

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 50

  • @FoodTruckEmily
    @FoodTruckEmily 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Sheri that one is a western! Sheri: “oh cool” hahaha
    This was so so rich. Loved this. I sent it to friends saying “they go from role playing games to knitting and then BAM you’re in the deep end”

    • @shari6063
      @shari6063 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you Emily❤

  • @justinsmorningcoffee
    @justinsmorningcoffee 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I have to say - Shari and Nate: you two are so so great at crafting (creating) a conversation. And Jordan, you’re right there with everyone - you reach dialogs on every channel you hop onto. As for me, I’m just super grateful I happened to run across you all

    • @shari6063
      @shari6063 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you Justin!

    • @FoodTruckEmily
      @FoodTruckEmily 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Right? They’re SO GOOD at talking

  • @elektrotehnik94
    @elektrotehnik94 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hope comes from a deeper place than Faith, both leading towards Love. ❤️
    I needed to hear that.
    A lot of everything else flew over my head... But this was gold 🏆

  • @lancecleaver227
    @lancecleaver227 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Despite my screw up... I really loved this conversation... y'all have a lot more to continue with

    • @shari6063
      @shari6063 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Love you Lance! And love the edits! 😂

    • @lancecleaver227
      @lancecleaver227 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@shari6063 thank you lol

  • @brendonlake1522
    @brendonlake1522 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Starts with D&D and goes deep into territory that 'the church' should really be discussing if our faith is going to achieve anything of note in this world!

  • @Slackarius
    @Slackarius 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    11:48 Don't tell me how to parent!

  • @WhiteStoneName
    @WhiteStoneName 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    47:00 unity/intimacy
    🎶”Bring me a higher love..”
    They is always an implicit unity behind any distinction.

  • @stoneylee6692
    @stoneylee6692 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Where can I find the Eckhart concept of astray mentioned at 17:09?

    • @shari6063
      @shari6063 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is found in this poem……
      The Grain of Mustard Seed
      When all began
      (beyond mind’s span)
      The word aye “is”
      oh what bliss
      When source at first gave birth to source
      Oh Father’s heart
      From which did start
      That same Word:
      Yet ‘tis averred
      The Word’s still kept in womb perforce.
      From both doth flow
      A loving glow:
      In double troth known to both
      Comes forth from them the Holy Ghost,
      of equal state
      inseparate
      The three are one:
      Who grasps it? None!
      Itself it knows itself the most.
      The threefold clasp
      we cannot grasp,
      the circle’s span
      no mind can scan:
      for here’s a mystery fathomless:
      Check and mate!
      Time, form, estate!
      The wondrous ring
      holds everything,
      Its central point stands motionless.
      The peak sublime
      deedless climb
      if thou art wise!
      Thy way then lies
      Through desert very strange to see,
      so deep, so wide,
      no bound’s descried.
      This desert’s bare
      Of “Then” or “There”
      In modeless singularity.
      This desert place
      no foot did pace,
      no creature mind
      Ingress can find.
      It “is”, yet truly none knows what.
      ‘Tis there, “tis here,
      ‘tis far, ‘tis near,
      ‘tis high, ‘tis low,
      yet all we know
      is: “This” it’s not and “That” it’s not.
      It’s clear and bright
      it’s dark as night;
      no name or sign
      can it define,
      beginningless, of ceasing free.
      Immobile bare, ‘tis flowing there.
      Where it may dwell
      whoso can tell,
      should teach us what it’s form may be.
      As a child become
      both blind and dumb.
      Thy own self’s aught
      must turn to naught.
      Both aught and naught Thou must reject,
      without a trace
      of image, time, or space.
      Go quite astray
      the pathless way
      the desert thou mayst then detect.
      My soul within,
      come out, God in!
      Sink all my aught
      in God’s own naught,
      sink down in bottomless abyss.
      Should I flee thee,
      thou wilt come to me;
      when Self is done,
      then Thou art won,
      thou transcendental highest bliss.

    • @stoneylee6692
      @stoneylee6692 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@shari6063 thank you so much! This conversation really resonated with me. This is something I've been contemplating as a cycle of going "astray" in the Greek sense of anagoge to reconcile with a higher truth. We are the one sheep leaving the 99 so we can encounter the Shepard on our own in new and profound ways.

  • @JessPurviance
    @JessPurviance 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Oh, nice! Listening now.

  • @CoranceLChandler
    @CoranceLChandler 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Never played Dungeons & Dragons but I've read about 50 books from that realm and I found it positively enchanting

  • @Seth_D_Myers
    @Seth_D_Myers 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    18:02 property concept of freedom. This is flowing through tlc and my thinking. It’s part of the authentic/sincere discussion.

  • @Neal_Daedalus
    @Neal_Daedalus 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    47:04 intimacy requires vulnerability of the elements in the relational. Meaning, the elements are open to being changed by the other.

  • @Neal_Daedalus
    @Neal_Daedalus 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    32:00 “the distinguishable unity” the unity is in the perceiver, the person, who is naming. The unity is through him who names

  • @Slackarius
    @Slackarius 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yes, more RPG talk is always welcome!

  • @mangr3n
    @mangr3n 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    My actions are evidence of faith, full stop. What I do shows you what I trust, have faith in, believe to be true. Not propositionally but embodied. Every action aims at an outcome, and that outcome is that which is hoped for. In any action resources are put at risk, in faith aimed at a hope. Sacrificed in faith toward a hope. That's action as a aimed or targeted or purposeful being.
    Faith -> Love(Charity/Sacrifice) -> Hope. This is the fundamental ground of human action, activity.

  • @justinsmorningcoffee
    @justinsmorningcoffee 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Freedom - *to* (to flourish, and in order to flourish you need to learn how to reach that level)

  • @RonCopperman
    @RonCopperman 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    excellent....( and your throw for wisdom is a 13. )

  • @notvadersson
    @notvadersson 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Re: True Freedom
    In the words of Wendell Berry,
    “So, friends, every day do something that won’t compute. Love the Lord. Love the world. Work for nothing. Take all that you have and be poor. Love someone who does not deserve it. Practice Resurrection.”

  • @notvadersson
    @notvadersson 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hope. Yup.
    Edit: Faith. Yup.
    We can’t talk about the anachronism of either.

  • @williambranch4283
    @williambranch4283 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We were playing pre-D&D in college on the school computer, via teletype text, against the algo.

    • @grailcountry
      @grailcountry  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What game specifically? To my knowledge none of those games existed prior to 1974 when D&D was published.

    • @williambranch4283
      @williambranch4283 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@grailcountry Hunt the Wumpus

  • @williambranch4283
    @williambranch4283 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My faith isn't absence or some vain hope, it is things seen and hope realized. Faith must be justified.

  • @Neal_Daedalus
    @Neal_Daedalus 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    30:45 I think before the name, it isn’t in relationality to the person. So with consciousness being centric, then yes, it does not yet exist

    • @Neal_Daedalus
      @Neal_Daedalus 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ooo mild epiphany I just had: before the name, the relationality is uni-directional- the “thing” can harm/threaten you, but until the name, you are not in relationality to IT.

    • @Neal_Daedalus
      @Neal_Daedalus 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Naming is the conscious positioning of relationality of oneself to the thing

  • @GrimGriz
    @GrimGriz 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    30:18 - when you name something it becomes part of the story

    • @Neal_Daedalus
      @Neal_Daedalus 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Whose story?

    • @GrimGriz
      @GrimGriz 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Neal_Daedalus do stories really have owners?

    • @Neal_Daedalus
      @Neal_Daedalus 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@GrimGriz owner? Or participant? But i would say, the perceiver has to be first, before there is something to perceive

  • @vagabondcaleb8915
    @vagabondcaleb8915 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Made in God's image is, in some ways, mean we contain the universe. Naming things to create harmony(good order).
    "...we teach kids language to name things as nouns. There are no nouns, right? Call it "tree"...billions of biochemical interactions and biological interactions and physical interactions that give rise to that thing. It's a process, right? You are a process. All the things that you think of as nouns [seem this way] because you're not observing very well." -D Schmachtenberger

  • @CNArtDesign
    @CNArtDesign 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Are there any book clubs/groups in TLC focusing on George MacDonald?
    I've dedicated this year to only reading him, and would love some people to talk about it with.
    I've heard Shari and Luke draw from his work recently.

    • @shari6063
      @shari6063 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hey Cord! Grail Country has a discord server and a couple of us are planning to read Lilith later in the summer. Would love it if you joined us!

    • @shari6063
      @shari6063 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And I also went through his two Imagination essays here on this channel, if you’re interested.

    • @CNArtDesign
      @CNArtDesign 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks, Shari.
      Yes I’d love an invite to that server and I’ll read along.

  • @mostlynotworking4112
    @mostlynotworking4112 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    🍿

  • @GrimGriz
    @GrimGriz 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The 2020 version was after my time :p

    • @grailcountry
      @grailcountry  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      CP 2013 was in 1989 and CP2020 was 1991. You ain't that old.

  • @CoranceLChandler
    @CoranceLChandler 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I agree, Nate. I do not believe God created out of nothing per se. I think he created from his imagination the way an author does a novel

    • @andyramirez6016
      @andyramirez6016 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Creation Ex Nihilo is the other side of the coin of Creation Ex Deo 🙂🦅✨

    • @CoranceLChandler
      @CoranceLChandler 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@andyramirez6016 how would you define creation Ex Nihilo?

    • @buglepong
      @buglepong 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      an omnipotent and omniscient being would create everything and every possibility just by imagining. if god can imagine it, it happens and since god can imagine anything, everything happens. that means things like alternate universes are all reality, somehwere