RCH: What are your thoughts on The Albigensian Crusade? Catholics vs Cathars. It seemed to be as bloody as the other crusades. There's a video about it on the Warographics channel. It's amazing how people justified their actions back then. There was nothing Christlike about them.
Also beads were found in archeology dig in viking lands that originated from middle east too. Shows an long trail of trading in deep trading and parts of Russia is to believe to be an land bridge to that place.
About the funeral ritual.. at that time the Scandinavians didn't burn their dead, they buried them (in ships or boats if possible). The "burn time", as it was called, was several centuries earlier. That alone tells that the described ritual was different from what was practiced in Scandinavia.
Not quite true. The death rituals of the Viking Age have been investigated by many researchers in recent times. It has turned out that the funerals could go quite differently depending on which village you were in. In Mälardalen, for example, the vast majority of people have been cremated and small stone embankments were built over the pyres. In Finnveden in the interior of Småland, the dead were also burned, but here they built large mounds of earth over the remains. Even today, there are hundreds of such mass graves hidden among the Småland firs. In most of Skåne, the dead were buried without burning them. Different regions thus had completely different traditions.
@@Lasse65 It makes sense that there would be variations in traditions, after all communities (those not close to waterways) would be pretty much isolated and do things differently (thus the ton of different dialects, particularly in Norway with all the mountains), but Sweden and even Denmark would have that too to various degrees.
The tradition of ship cremations first tracked at the beginning of the Viking Age. The earliest burials were found among the Swedish community on the Åland Islands, from where the tradition spread to mainland Sweden, displacing the elite burial rites of the Vendel Age. In the Viking Age, boat cremations are considered a marker of the presence of people from Scandinavia.
Wow, this video is great. I think your narrator and editor was fantastic and always enjoy your videos Stephen. Great to have collaborated with everyone on this project.
Yes, a Swede told me founders of today Ukraine, Russia were Varangians 🇸🇪 Vikings Rus; means in 🇫🇮 to row Viking boats. At Kievan Rus, first tribes Derebyany (woods people), Polovtsi, sarmathians, Siveryany, & Ulichi. Vikings were family Rurik
Rurik was not a Viking, he was a Varangian, the Varangians lived in the Baltic, Rurik's grandfather was the leader of the Ilmen tribes and his name was Gostomysl, and it was him who invited Rurik, his grandson, to rule, his daughter Umila was Rurik's mother. They spoke the same language, worshipped the same gods, and even buried according to the same rite. Rurik came to his grandfather, and built the city of Novgorod, and became the Prince of Novgorod. Novgorod is the North of Russia.The beginning of the formation of the Ancient Russian state is considered to be the capture of Kiev by Prince Oleg of Novgorod, that is, the unification of Novgorod and Kiev under one government. There was no Ukraine and there could not be. Ukraine was created by the Communists. Lenin and Stalin.
@@olga9219 The part about someone inviting someone I find doubtful. They were pillagers and they took over by force. The later historians wrote the invitation story because you can't write bad things about the ruling class.
Always found it interesting the Swedes believed they came from the steppes in or near modern ukraine. They even thought Odin came from there. What is fascinating is that the Heruli ,a germanic migration era tribe, who had been under the domination of the Huns, it is alleged moved back to Sweden in the 5-6th century. They is some archaeological evidence for this. And where did the huns find these people ? As part of the Goth empire in the 360's - somewhere on the steppe near modern ukraine. Its possible the viking legends of asgard, odin, thor etc are some kind of racial memory of their own history or at least that of their chiefs.
There was no Goth Emprie, but there was a Got/Get one. It was the biggest nation of europe separated by Dnepr river in Geta/Gota and MasaGeta/MasaGota. They came from the Gota as preserved in the GotLand region name.
@@snuurferalangur4357 How do you know what they believed ? There are no written sources - just by your own admission something written centuries later.
It's even more interesting than that. Go back another 3000 to 4000 years. At that time, Europe and the middle East were populated by indigenous people, people that now only exist as a linguistic and genetic substrate in current populations. Anyway, the first Indo-Europeans were one people on the steppes speaking one language. From there they spread. To Europe, to Iran & Turkey, to India and China even. So the swedes are even more correct than they could have known. It's also interesting to note that Odin and many of the other Gods may have existed in some form in the mythology of these early Indo-Europeans
Ro (Swedish) = to row a boat Roslagen = peninsula east of Svealand, called "rowing strike" Ruotsi (Finnish) = land of the Rus, land of the men who row boats Rus = rowing men
@@petripaavonpoika3767 Roslagen firstly appeared in 1493, before this province was called as Rodhin, and before 1296 Roden. How Ruses could came from Roslagen if this name have not existed yet 700 years?
Who would call himself as rower considering that this work was done by slaves in ancient times? Imagine that you are an advocate/doctor and you have a small office and practice but you do not want to hire cleaning and do it by yourself. Would you call yourself as a cleaner? In the ancient times, there were professions of warriors or traders, but rowers were slaves. However, to save space for extra goods and trophies, warriors and traders sometimes did this job by themselves that of course, does not mean that they become rowers.
@@sergii2945 So the name has been the same for 1000 years? Only pronaunciations have evolved along with centuries? They do, we would not understand the language of the 10th century.
Rurik was from the tribe of the Obodrites, this is the Baltic, his mother was the daughter of the leader of the Ilmen tribes, grandfather of Rurik, it was he who brought Rurik and his brothers, Truvor and Sineus, to the North of present-day Russia, where Rurik built the city of Novgorod, and became prince. Now they are digging up mounds, burials of Rurik's troops, DNA tests are being done (these are Slavs), not Scandinavians.
False title. Ukraine was never ''founded'' it was always divided in kingdoms or part of larger realms. More accurate to say they were the ancestors of the Russians, Ukrainians and Belarussians along with the native slavic population they intermingled with.
Thank you for saying this… Russians, Ukrainians, and Belarussians are all equal parts inheritors of the legacy of Kievan Rus, to say only Ukrainians is lying by omission
Not hating but to say that the Rus founded Ukraine is anachronistic, they founded the medieval principality of Kievan Rus, the state of Ukraine is a later concept
Maybe the symbol of long boat is a bit confusing. The rivers could not be traversed by ships but the travellers had to change to smaller boats. So, any longboats travelling to Byzantine would have been built at the other end of the river route. So the route was an advanced system with posts to change mode of transport, to winter and to store items.
Long ships were capable of navigating inland rivers including the Volga. They had a shallow draft and could operate in water that was only 1 meter deep. They were also light enough to be carried or pushed on rollers over portages.
@@jacquesstrapp3219 Do you have a source for this? The river systems included many rapids and there are documentary evidence of Rus traveling with "monoxyla" (lit. one log, a north Eurasian traditional dugout canoe, which was a resilient and light craft ideal for such journeys. It might be possible physically but not practical, as changing crafts at specific centres is more efficient.
@@Kuriver My family comes from the Volga region. The Volga is huge. At it's widest and deepest it is over 3 km wide and 50 meters deep. At it's source it is almost 500 meters wide and 20 meters deep. This is easily navigable for long ships. The Varangians (Vikings) had a base at Ladoga. They would sail up the Volkhov River to lake Ilmen then up the Lovat River. They would then portage their long ships 3 km to the Volga River. It was easy sailing all the way to the Caspian Sea from there. I suggest you educate yourself by searching Varangians, longships and the Volga trade route before making any further comments.
@@Matt.Willoughby Yes, it would, but it's largely unknown exactly to what extent such ritual sacrifices were carried out. This is the problem with fictional accounts, especially movies and shows like Vikings, since they get embedded in our minds, even if on a rational level we realize they are fictitious. These sacrifices are not mentioned in that many texts, and it would be a major leap of faith to declare the few sources we have as truthful. Christians in particular would be tempted to exaggerate or even make up negative details about the old beliefs in order to justify their christening campaigns.
@@meadish You're right of course, it's impossible to have an objective view of the past, but that's just history. There are mountains of evidence of ritual sacrifice. How often and under what circumstances they took place is unknown but both ritual animal and human ritual slaughter is well attested
Rurik is as legendary and mythical as the dragons on the vikings' sails. Mentioned only in 1113 in the same source that tells the story of "tribes inviting vikings to rule over them". Most probably Nestor's or someone else's invention
there is no reason to think Rurik is mythical , he is also mentioned in Scandinavian sources, also there have been found remains of Vikings in Novogorod , the first Viking settlement there was called "Holmgard" that is a common name for a place in Scandinavia still today
I think the Rus were not 100% scandinavian, but already mixed with slavic and finnish tribes one or two generations before when they were invited to rule Kiev
I'm sure Everyone will be able to Smell ALL the IF coming off of this comment but IF you have the opportunity to go to Kyiv Ukraine and IF the Russians are run out in time you can enjoy these museums and IF the Russians haven't destroyed these museums and IF they haven't Pillaged these museums I suggest you take that opportunity and view there Archeology Exhibits And Evidence about their Own Origins!!! 🤠👍🇺🇦
This video is not factual at all. Vikings did not found Ukraine. They did found Russia. Notice they start talking about Kievan Rus, Rus does not stand for Ukraine it stands for Russia, it was the original name of Russia. Kiev was the second capital of Russia, Novgorod was the first capital. There was no country called Ukraine until the modern era, it was founded by the Zaporozhian Cossacks.
@@olga9219That's interesting considering the Cossacks referred to their land as Ukraina in documents and on maps, had the Ukrainian colours, and that the Bolsheviks were at war with a Ukrainian republic during thr Russian civil war.
I believe that Ukrainian and Russia are amazing countries, I avoid all the brutality and cruelty that is happening right now. I love to look at their amazing history and their pop culture that is just as awesome as Chinese pop culture and Japanese pop culture.
Yeah that is a culture of bloody murderers Russia and Ukraine two sons of the same mother During second war they had kill over 7million people in most brutal inhuman way Barbaric breed
it is ruzzian version of history, I know trhat you are doing it with good intentions, but source of history is not what we use in Ukraine. Staraja Ladoga is a village, younger than Kyiv, and you call it the beginning of Rus
The first capital of Ancient Russia was Staraya Ladoga in 753 (this is near St. Petersburg), then Novgorod, where Rurik became the Prince of Novgorod, and only then the Novgorod princes moved the capital to Kiev, after Kiev was Vladimir, Suzdal, then Moscow.
how does that all explain the name of Ruthenia being used in Latin chronicles and scripts (as nearly everything was written in Latin in Europe of those days) with relation to those lands since the 6th century or so?
As a Kiev citizen, I can say that you can use both variations. When you are avoiding all politics Kiev is half Ukraine, half Russian-speaking city. And you can use both Kyiv and Kiev. But in a formal way, it is better to use Kyiv.
Iryna/Anna of Kyiv-Rus was born in Sweden, she had eight siblings... Their descendants today is probably 100 000 people at least. Some of them are probably Ace of Base-siblings...
@@johankrushammar7336 Yes Borbon....! Who are related to Capet.. But if you look at a young Juan Carlos and Jonas Berggren, you find similarity in chin, nose and wavy hair... Or am I just imagining...?
Slavic, Finnic and Baltic tribes mix with the Swede Vikings or Varangians and the Kievan Rus' rulers we're of Swede and Slavic ancestry and possibly Finnic too and then Byzantine Greek throw in the mix
Uhh no the it was just slavs the inly mixing was between the ruling class aka scandinavian and slavic, the people who lived in the kievan rus werent just slavs however they didnt mix they remained separate people to this day, why do think the baltics are still separate nations
The fun is that Bisantium (emperor Pheophil to Luis king of Frankia in 839 ad), arab, Persian monks have written chronicles about "Rus from Kyiv" merchants and raids to their lands even Before tale of "vikings coming to Ladoga in 862 ad". Furthermore, there is No evidences from archeologists, nor from chronicle that Novgorod was found at that time, but even the Ladoga was a small village.
Fun fact Rurik,Oleg,Igor of Kiev, and Sviatoslav 1 were all staunch pagans that never converted so don't twist history. Also the Scandinavians were definitely not illiterate they had the runic scripts which are absolutely a writing system
Fun fact: the Cyrillic alphabet still used today (please correct me if I’m wrong) was instituted by Saint Cyril, who converted all the Rus only a century after the events of the video. Also, where does the (fake) conversion of the Khazars fit into this narrative?
Swedish and Fins are Jutes, Angles are Anglos and Norweigans as well. Sweds went east, Danes/Norwegians went down to the locations of even Mesopotamia. Saxons are Norse and are Germanic all have the same beliefs with some differences (Odinism and Wodenism). All Norse traded around all Eurasia and north Africa and the dates are found from Mammoth Tusks. Look at ancient Farthic and then look at other languages. The Germanic stretched from outside the Franks to the slavic regions.
@@MrMackievelli Scandinavians belong to North German branch of Germanic peoples. Jutes are one of the tribes that eventually became Danish. While Angeles were from a west Germanic peoples. (like their more famous nabours the Saxons)
Rus didn't come to Kyev, Rus' was Kyev and Chernihiv region. In the chronicles, The North lands were not called Rus' before the collapse of Rus', the North or Moscow region and other current Russian lands used to be under Rus' control as its colonies. The North or modern Moscow lands with Finno-ugric trips there were colonies of Rus'. That is why to name Moscow lands as Rus' is like to call India as England because India used to be under The Great Britain empire control.
The idea that ships were set on fire when in water is hard to prove for obvious reasons, most common AFAIK was burying the ship with the man "on board" in the soil, I'm no expert but that's what I've read about eg the graves in Gamla Upsala, and I'm pretty sure that none of the ships there were burned
This is the first video amongst a dozen to note that a bunch of people inviting viking raiders to rule over them sounds a little sus. Maybe be a little history being written by the victors there.
The way the Russians were shown in the series is terrible. Not only did they have Russian Christians before the baptism of Russia, but they also have Mongolian clothes
Kievan Rus never existed. What is called «Kievan Rus» is a time period of Russia, actually. How much can you explain? Therefore, who do you wish victory to? 😃It's funny.
@@ОлегБобров-т7юRUS existed much more earlier than ruzzia appeared. Kiev is 1500 y.o. Moscow is only 850 y.o. Kiev, Chernigov, Pereyaslav, Galich etc. were most ancient cities of RUS and those cities are still in modern Ukraine
@@TheOlgaSasha Во-первых, не факт, что Киеву 1500 лет. Во-вторых, даже если бы и так, что с того? К тому же, а где в вашем списке Новгород, Смоленск, Ростов, Суздаль? Или это не города древней Руси, а? В чём, собственно, суть ваших претензий не улавливаю.
@@TheOlgaSasha Novgorod and Stara Ladoga are older that Kiev. All of them were part of same country, Rus or Russia. Word "Ukraine" came much later. Ukraine was never a country until 1992. Russia, Ukraine and Belarus will be one country again.
@@ОлегБобров-т7юit’s logical and written in History that Kiev is older than Moscow. You Russians hate that reality which is why you guys hate Ukrainians most likely
The word "rus" comes from the swedish word "rorsman" (the man who steers the ship). It was interpreteded as "rus-man", which is why the swedish viking became known as the "rus". The area in eastern Sweden where most vikings came from (as the arrows in the movie show) is known as Roslagen still today. So Rus-sians are just swedes wannabees... 😂
In fact, Sweden is still called "Ruotsi" in Finnish and "Roots" in Estonian, as Roslagen would have been the closest part of Sweden with most contact to the Finns, there are millenia long contacts between these areas. Funnily enough, the modern name for Russia in Finnish in "Venäjä" which comes from the Venedi, a west slavic tribe on the southern shores of the Baltic Sea ("ryssä" is a derogatory term). Maybe this gives a hint from where (and when) the slavic people came to Russia. During the time of the Rus, northern Russia was pretty much Finnic speaking but the influence of Christianity (old Church slavic) caused these people to change their language during the next centuries. The problem with history often is that modern concepts and borders of nations are projected to the past.
The kings of the viking age Sweden or Svearige, when going Viking, they could by law require rowers for the ships along the coast. This law was named"roslagen", directly translated the law of rowers. From this the slavs derived "ros" or "rus" and then Russia as the Swedes started dominating the land. Tor.
@@viktormogilin307 россия уже была в 10 веке как слово и иван 3 в 15 веке был великий князь вся руси, его официальный титул и был он из рода Рюрика. Где тут Усраинцы ?
Sweden had a great influence on Russia about 1000-1200 years ago. It was common that in the elite of Kyiv-Rus or Novgorod -Rus that they had one, two or more swedish ancestors/relatives. As late as 14th c icelandic scribes called Rus area for "The great/big Sweden". Common cultural features still exists. F.ex. in eastern Sweden when older people see a black cat they still spit three times over left shoulder to stop misfortunes to happen, exactly what they do in Russia...Other similarites is a sacrifice to Tomte/Nisse or farmspirit, in Russia it´s called Domevoi. Both people used to put steel in cradle or threshold to stop Trolls or Lezji(treepeople) to steal the children...
Russia didn’t exist thousands years, Name Russia came to existence in 1721. This story is based on legends not historical facts. Too bad is spreading myths.
Kyiv Ruś has nothing to do with Muscovia, Novgorod that’s a legend, archeological findings place origins of Novgorod after Kyiv glorious times. Ruś is not todays Russia, Peter 1 only in 18 century adopted fraudulently Greek name Rossia for Moscovia. Ruś it is nowadays Ukraine.
come on the Vikings didn’t found Ukraine nor Russia… how possibly could they. Maybe it’s time for the Slavs to invite Norsemen again to rule upon them , cause certainly they are still not capable of doing that…
Ukraine has a big problem with the corrupt dictator Zelensky. And the russian government is not that bad. Its at least better than the Swedish government
The the Russ are Russians were encouraged to build their first city and capital here. The regions around Kyiv is the original homeland of the Russ or rus tribes ,Russians existed here from prehistoric time over 20,000 years .
Rurik (Lachyn) is from the Bulgar Dulo clan, descendant of Kubrat and Attila. He was never a viking. It's all written in Djagfar Tarihi. Modern Ukraine is on the territory of Old Great Bulgaria (Urus Bulgar) , which in the 7th century divided into Khazaria, Avaria, Danube Bulgaria and Black Bulgaria (with Kyiv capital). In the 9th century after a Civil War Black Bulgaria (Kara Bulgar) divided into Volga Bulgaria (Ak Bulgar) and Kyiv Rus (Urus).
@Jotaro97 My brother in Christ, literally all evidence points to it. VIkings never used the trident tamga. The trident (Baltavar) was the arms of Dulo clan and a symbol of Bulgar statehood. Also as I said above, it's all written in Djagfar Tarihi, the lineage of Rurik, Attila etc. Half of these chronicles were destroyed by NKVD but we are lucky that the other half was saved and was kept in the so called Tatar SSR.
@@felix2000-h7gUkrainians are not descendants of Poles. It is nonesense. Modern so-called "russians" are in fact a mix of moscowians, novgorodians and 30 other not Slavic (Turkic, Ugro-Finnic etc) peoples which were officially called "Russia" only in times of Peter I in 18th century. Kiev was and remains "the mother of Rus' cities" (as it was always called in chronicles)
@@TheOlgaSasha Rus is Russia. So called "Ukrainians" are mixture of Russians, and minorities in today Ukraine (Hungarians, Poles, Bulgarians, etc...). There was never a "Ukraine" country until 1991.
Being a Swede I always thought that these forefathers are despicable and disgusting, but this presentation also makes them ludicrously despicable and disgusting. I thank you for that. I have some fantasy authoring in my mind.
It is not vikings that enslaved the slavic peoples. The slavic peoples ARE vikings. J3ws enslaved the slavs and traded them. This account is a fiction to scapegoat vikings for the crimes of Jewry. The viking population of Ukraine was enslaved by J3wish slavers operating from their Byzantine Judeo-christian empire.
Ra, Re, Ri, Ro, and Ru are root words for REd in RA, HeRA, HoRI, ROse, JeRUsalem, HoRUs, RUssian, and over half of the languages on earth. The RU in Russ means Red.
Русь в повести временньІх лет бьІла извесна еще до Рюрика, -В год 6360 (852), индикта 15, когда начал царствовать Михаил, стала прозываться Русская земля. Узнали мы об этом потому, что при этом царе приходила Русь на Царьград, И вся ета история о том што рюрик принес название "Русь" придумали только из одного неправильно переведенного слова "пояши" в летописи)))
Скажу в двух словах. Во-первых, не была Русь, как государство, до прихода варягов. Во-вторых, а что слово *«пояши»* должно по-вашему означать, как «правильно» оно должно переводиться?
@@ОлегБобров-т7ю Во всех остальньІх случаях слово пояши переведено как приняли, -приняли по себе всю русь также как напимер приняли правление в руси в своих наделах сьІньІ ВолодьІмьІра Мономаха а младшенькому-уродцу у которого маменька половчанка отпрввили куда подальше с глаз долой в леса залешанские.
@@ОлегБобров-т7ю ВьІ плохо знаете истрию Руси, на византию походами ходили а государственности небьІло))) гардарика -страна городов (змиевьІе вальІ протяженностю 2000км) существовали но государства небьІло. А как вьІ обясните што например о всех достоверно извесньІх описаниях Киевских князьях линии рюрика о них описания как о русинах а не как о вьІходцах из скандинавов.
@@ОлегБобров-т7ю А тут еще например Кирило тот што Кирило и Мефодий когда прибьІл в Корсунь то тогда он видел евангелие написаньІе на "роський мови" и общался с роським монахом, предствляешь себе такое, руси с ваших слов нет а письменность и книги есть)))
Yes, a Swede told me founders of today Ukraine, Russia were Varangians 🇸🇪 Vikings Rus; means in 🇫🇮 to row Viking boats. At Kievan Rus, first tribes Derebyany (woods people), Polovtsi, sarmathians, Siveryany, & Ulichi. Vikings were family Rurik
Take a tour through the Viking Age: th-cam.com/video/9tK4tFx7-sg/w-d-xo.html
RCH: What are your thoughts on The Albigensian Crusade? Catholics vs Cathars. It seemed to be as bloody as the other crusades. There's a video about it on the Warographics channel.
It's amazing how people justified their actions back then. There was nothing Christlike about them.
@@darthracer777 I did a doc on that one you might enjoy: th-cam.com/video/f8XEoAHfrhE/w-d-xo.html
My middle name is Igor, I want 40 concubines and to pluck one for public display
Also beads were found in archeology dig in viking lands that originated from middle east too. Shows an long trail of trading in deep trading and parts of Russia is to believe to be an land bridge to that place.
Thanks for educating us, and bringing a smile to my face.
Thank you!
Ukraine is Russua
@@TacticalGoat sure doesn’t look that way.
@@PurelyGoliathlooks doesnt dictate facts. Rewriting history books doesn't help either.
@@d3vildoll666 Rus civilization was founded in Kyiv, lol.
You gotta love Olha. Her stunt with birds burning down Korosten is probably the first arial raid that pre-dates Wright brothers 😅
One of my favorite Rus rulers
You mean Olga
About the funeral ritual.. at that time the Scandinavians didn't burn their dead, they buried them (in ships or boats if possible). The "burn time", as it was called, was several centuries earlier. That alone tells that the described ritual was different from what was practiced in Scandinavia.
Not quite true. The death rituals of the Viking Age have been investigated by many researchers in recent times. It has turned out that the funerals could go quite differently depending on which village you were in. In Mälardalen, for example, the vast majority of people have been cremated and small stone embankments were built over the pyres. In Finnveden in the interior of Småland, the dead were also burned, but here they built large mounds of earth over the remains. Even today, there are hundreds of such mass graves hidden among the Småland firs. In most of Skåne, the dead were buried without burning them. Different regions thus had completely different traditions.
@@Lasse65 It makes sense that there would be variations in traditions, after all communities (those not close to waterways) would be pretty much isolated and do things differently (thus the ton of different dialects, particularly in Norway with all the mountains), but Sweden and even Denmark would have that too to various degrees.
The tradition of ship cremations first tracked at the beginning of the Viking Age. The earliest burials were found among the Swedish community on the Åland Islands, from where the tradition spread to mainland Sweden, displacing the elite burial rites of the Vendel Age. In the Viking Age, boat cremations are considered a marker of the presence of people from Scandinavia.
Grateful for this Playlist! @Kings and Generals & Company!!
So far I have given a thumbs up to every video in this playlist and am looking forward to the others!
Wow, this video is great. I think your narrator and editor was fantastic and always enjoy your videos Stephen. Great to have collaborated with everyone on this project.
Thanks Daniel! I'm looking forward to checking out your video as well!
Yes, a Swede told me founders of today Ukraine, Russia were Varangians 🇸🇪 Vikings Rus; means in 🇫🇮 to row Viking boats. At Kievan Rus, first tribes Derebyany (woods people), Polovtsi, sarmathians, Siveryany, & Ulichi. Vikings were family Rurik
Rurik was not a Viking, he was a Varangian, the Varangians lived in the Baltic, Rurik's grandfather was the leader of the Ilmen tribes and his name was Gostomysl, and it was him who invited Rurik, his grandson, to rule, his daughter Umila was Rurik's mother. They spoke the same language, worshipped the same gods, and even buried according to the same rite. Rurik came to his grandfather, and built the city of Novgorod, and became the Prince of Novgorod. Novgorod is the North of Russia.The beginning of the formation of the Ancient Russian state is considered to be the capture of Kiev by Prince Oleg of Novgorod, that is, the unification of Novgorod and Kiev under one government. There was no Ukraine and there could not be. Ukraine was created by the Communists. Lenin and Stalin.
@@olga9219 The part about someone inviting someone I find doubtful. They were pillagers and they took over by force. The later historians wrote the invitation story because you can't write bad things about the ruling class.
Great video : )
Glad you liked it!
Great video!
Glad you enjoyed it
Always found it interesting the Swedes believed they came from the steppes in or near modern ukraine. They even thought Odin came from there. What is fascinating is that the Heruli ,a germanic migration era tribe, who had been under the domination of the Huns, it is alleged moved back to Sweden in the 5-6th century. They is some archaeological evidence for this. And where did the huns find these people ? As part of the Goth empire in the 360's - somewhere on the steppe near modern ukraine. Its possible the viking legends of asgard, odin, thor etc are some kind of racial memory of their own history or at least that of their chiefs.
There was no Goth Emprie, but there was a Got/Get one. It was the biggest nation of europe separated by Dnepr river in Geta/Gota and MasaGeta/MasaGota.
They came from the Gota as preserved in the GotLand region name.
@@snuurferalangur4357 How do you know what they believed ? There are no written sources - just by your own admission something written centuries later.
Fascinating postulations. I suppose we'll never know, but ideas are definitely intriguing.
It's even more interesting than that. Go back another 3000 to 4000 years. At that time, Europe and the middle East were populated by indigenous people, people that now only exist as a linguistic and genetic substrate in current populations. Anyway, the first Indo-Europeans were one people on the steppes speaking one language. From there they spread. To Europe, to Iran & Turkey, to India and China even. So the swedes are even more correct than they could have known. It's also interesting to note that Odin and many of the other Gods may have existed in some form in the mythology of these early Indo-Europeans
@@soiahDnipro (modern name of Borisfen)
Such a great and interesting video! Thank you for your content!
Great video! 🇸🇪
You should put the year on topnright corner of the maps you show like kag do. Nice video
Ro (Swedish) = to row a boat
Roslagen = peninsula east of Svealand, called "rowing strike"
Ruotsi (Finnish) = land of the Rus, land of the men who row boats
Rus = rowing men
Everything is doubtful.
@@sergii2945 you can doubt anything, but the linquistic issues above are facts.
@@petripaavonpoika3767 Roslagen firstly appeared in 1493, before this province was called as Rodhin, and before 1296 Roden. How Ruses could came from Roslagen if this name have not existed yet 700 years?
Who would call himself as rower considering that this work was done by slaves in ancient times? Imagine that you are an advocate/doctor and you have a small office and practice but you do not want to hire cleaning and do it by yourself. Would you call yourself as a cleaner? In the ancient times, there were professions of warriors or traders, but rowers were slaves. However, to save space for extra goods and trophies, warriors and traders sometimes did this job by themselves that of course, does not mean that they become rowers.
@@sergii2945 So the name has been the same for 1000 years? Only pronaunciations have evolved along with centuries? They do, we would not understand the language of the 10th century.
The Rus conquered the Slavs militarily and the Slavs conquered the Rus culturally in the end.
Rus it is Baltic slavs.
trueee
Rurik was from the tribe of the Obodrites, this is the Baltic, his mother was the daughter of the leader of the Ilmen tribes, grandfather of Rurik, it was he who brought Rurik and his brothers, Truvor and Sineus, to the North of present-day Russia, where Rurik built the city of Novgorod, and became prince. Now they are digging up mounds, burials of Rurik's troops, DNA tests are being done (these are Slavs), not Scandinavians.
False title. Ukraine was never ''founded'' it was always divided in kingdoms or part of larger realms. More accurate to say they were the ancestors of the Russians, Ukrainians and Belarussians along with the native slavic population they intermingled with.
Thank you for saying this… Russians, Ukrainians, and Belarussians are all equal parts inheritors of the legacy of Kievan Rus, to say only Ukrainians is lying by omission
If so, following some people's "logic", Russia should be returned to Sweden, Denmark and Norway.
And Kyiv (Ukraine), which ruled over what is now "Russia".
@@just_inker2584Kiev was the capital of rurikid th Dynasty that founded Moscow and Russia.
@@SafavidAfsharid3197 moscow was founded under Mongols, not under Kyiv.
Uh nuh. Russia belongs to Russia, because they're Baltic Slavic states. Ukraine however can go back to Sweden or whoever.
@@just_inker2584 The Mongols founded Moscow? -_-
Not hating but to say that the Rus founded Ukraine is anachronistic, they founded the medieval principality of Kievan Rus, the state of Ukraine is a later concept
Kievan Rus' was dominated by Ukrainians, and is their origins.
This reminds this of the movie The 13th Warrior!
Really excellent film, that. Far better than any expectations.
I'm trying my best to learn more about the world it can get very difficult trying to remember everything and the different people and languages.
The title is missleading !
I'd heard of the Silk Road but never looked for the trail. I had no idea it went through any Viking territory.
It didn’t
I didn't know it either.
Thank you for video
Maybe the symbol of long boat is a bit confusing. The rivers could not be traversed by ships but the travellers had to change to smaller boats. So, any longboats travelling to Byzantine would have been built at the other end of the river route. So the route was an advanced system with posts to change mode of transport, to winter and to store items.
Long ships were capable of navigating inland rivers including the Volga. They had a shallow draft and could operate in water that was only 1 meter deep. They were also light enough to be carried or pushed on rollers over portages.
@@jacquesstrapp3219 Do you have a source for this? The river systems included many rapids and there are documentary evidence of Rus traveling with "monoxyla" (lit. one log, a north Eurasian traditional dugout canoe, which was a resilient and light craft ideal for such journeys. It might be possible physically but not practical, as changing crafts at specific centres is more efficient.
@@Kuriver My family comes from the Volga region. The Volga is huge. At it's widest and deepest it is over 3 km wide and 50 meters deep. At it's source it is almost 500 meters wide and 20 meters deep. This is easily navigable for long ships.
The Varangians (Vikings) had a base at Ladoga. They would sail up the Volkhov River to lake Ilmen then up the Lovat River. They would then portage their long ships 3 km to the Volga River. It was easy sailing all the way to the Caspian Sea from there.
I suggest you educate yourself by searching Varangians, longships and the Volga trade route before making any further comments.
@@jacquesstrapp3219really it is like a movie in your mouth.thanks.
Well, Russians used ships called "ladya" for trading with the vikings and the Byzantine and they were designed like vikings' drakkars
I've always wondered if the vikings ever ran into any zoastrians
No mystery- they would steal their gold.
They traveled to Baghdad. May have met some there.
zorastrians didnt much exist in Islamic era
Im sure they did. I think they were in Iran most parts.
@@yashvardhansingh1343they probably survived in small pockets in the Caucasus
Olga was made the patron saint of Kiev
Olga was from Pskov, which is the North of Russia.
Your theme melody is like a lit match🔥
History has been mostly bloody, no matter what nationality or culture one comes from.
Yep. Nature itself is quite brutal.
Triggered!!! But but ……Only white people have violent
and it's still bloody, hope one day this world can be peaceful
what is teh source for you statement at 2:16 timestamp about snorri describing homeland as being in the caucuses?
"It's delightful and exciting to know that my ancestors were pagan barbarians (barbarian pagans? take your pick!)."
Just pegans. Their practice ritual sacrifice is certainly barbaric though.
@@Matt.Willoughby Yes, it would, but it's largely unknown exactly to what extent such ritual sacrifices were carried out. This is the problem with fictional accounts, especially movies and shows like Vikings, since they get embedded in our minds, even if on a rational level we realize they are fictitious.
These sacrifices are not mentioned in that many texts, and it would be a major leap of faith to declare the few sources we have as truthful. Christians in particular would be tempted to exaggerate or even make up negative details about the old beliefs in order to justify their christening campaigns.
@@meadish You're right of course, it's impossible to have an objective view of the past, but that's just history. There are mountains of evidence of ritual sacrifice. How often and under what circumstances they took place is unknown but both ritual animal and human ritual slaughter is well attested
Everyone's ancestors were pagans, regardless of where you are from.
@@meadish Thanks - that makes total sense.
Rurik is as legendary and mythical as the dragons on the vikings' sails. Mentioned only in 1113 in the same source that tells the story of "tribes inviting vikings to rule over them". Most probably Nestor's or someone else's invention
there is no reason to think Rurik is mythical , he is also mentioned in Scandinavian sources, also there have been found remains of Vikings in Novogorod , the first Viking settlement there was called "Holmgard" that is a common name for a place in Scandinavia still today
I think the Rus were not 100% scandinavian, but already mixed with slavic and finnish tribes one or two generations before when they were invited to rule Kiev
Because the Rus were mainly Polabian Slavs. And the Scandinavians were mercenaries.
They were invited to rule Novgorod, not Kiev
It looks like Rurik had n1c genes, so possible.
I'm sure Everyone will be able to Smell ALL the IF coming off of this comment but IF you have the opportunity to go to Kyiv Ukraine and IF the Russians are run out in time you can enjoy these museums and IF the Russians haven't destroyed these museums and IF they haven't Pillaged these museums I suggest you take that opportunity and view there Archeology Exhibits And Evidence about their Own Origins!!! 🤠👍🇺🇦
A good video 👊🏻
They gave 3 possible origins of the word rus without mentioning the by far most common one I've heard, that is Roslagen (coastal region in Sweden).
This video is not factual at all. Vikings did not found Ukraine. They did found Russia.
Notice they start talking about Kievan Rus, Rus does not stand for Ukraine it stands for Russia, it was the original name of Russia. Kiev was the second capital of Russia, Novgorod was the first capital. There was no country called Ukraine until the modern era, it was founded by the Zaporozhian Cossacks.
The Zaporozhian Cossacks lived in Little Russia and Novorossiya, and Ukraine was founded by communists Lenin and Stalin.
@@olga9219That's interesting considering the Cossacks referred to their land as Ukraina in documents and on maps, had the Ukrainian colours, and that the Bolsheviks were at war with a Ukrainian republic during thr Russian civil war.
What are the paintings shown in the video?
I believe that Ukrainian and Russia are amazing countries, I avoid all the brutality and cruelty that is happening right now. I love to look at their amazing history and their pop culture that is just as awesome as Chinese pop culture and Japanese pop culture.
The "brutality" you are avoiding will determine the future of the country. It is history in the making and should not be ignored.
Russia is attacking their neighbour as we read this, they are killing ordinary Ukrainians in their homes. You cannot and should not ignore this fact.
Russia presently is vehemently anti-Catholic with crushing poverty and appealing abortion rate.
Yeah that is a culture of bloody murderers Russia and Ukraine two sons
of the same mother During second war they had kill over 7million people
in most brutal inhuman way Barbaric breed
@@jacquesstrapp3219 they're probably like 12. look at their sn. let em be innocent a while longer
it is ruzzian version of history, I know trhat you are doing it with good intentions, but source of history is not what we use in Ukraine. Staraja Ladoga is a village, younger than Kyiv, and you call it the beginning of Rus
No because Russia likes to down play their viking past....
Ukraine is a Bolshevik invention.
precisely, this is a Russian imperial version of the "history".
The first capital of Ancient Russia was Staraya Ladoga in 753 (this is near St. Petersburg), then Novgorod, where Rurik became the Prince of Novgorod, and only then the Novgorod princes moved the capital to Kiev, after Kiev was Vladimir, Suzdal, then Moscow.
how does that all explain the name of Ruthenia being used in Latin chronicles and scripts (as nearly everything was written in Latin in Europe of those days) with relation to those lands since the 6th century or so?
I must say that Vikings were the true ride or die homies. Lol. These guys were crazy.
They were nuts.
You spelled Mongols wrong. LOL!!
Writing "Kiev.." is not the correct translation into English...
The correct translation is "Kyiv.."
It is Kiev .
🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
Not true
As a Kiev citizen, I can say that you can use both variations. When you are avoiding all politics Kiev is half Ukraine, half Russian-speaking city. And you can use both Kyiv and Kiev. But in a formal way, it is better to use Kyiv.
@@oleg2205 it’s been used this way only since what the mid 90s?
what previz did you use to create the 3d?
Not the same without you narrating...thumbs up though of course
You don't like the pro narrator?
@@RealCrusadesHistory no he's not as captivating as you...sorry just got used to you and the powerful guitar rifts !!!
The pro doesn't have the crusader spirit he's merely a mercenary he will flee in the heat of battle
@@babyyoda0U812 I agree with you, and love ihaka Hearty's comment here!
Iryna/Anna of Kyiv-Rus was born in Sweden, she had eight siblings... Their descendants today is probably 100 000 people at least. Some of them are probably Ace of Base-siblings...
Try Habsburg and spain royal house
@@johankrushammar7336 Yes Borbon....! Who are related to Capet.. But if you look at a young Juan Carlos and Jonas Berggren, you find similarity in chin, nose and wavy hair... Or am I just imagining...?
Slavic, Finnic and Baltic tribes mix with the Swede Vikings or Varangians and the Kievan Rus' rulers we're of Swede and Slavic ancestry and possibly Finnic too and then Byzantine Greek throw in the mix
Uhh no the it was just slavs the inly mixing was between the ruling class aka scandinavian and slavic, the people who lived in the kievan rus werent just slavs however they didnt mix they remained separate people to this day, why do think the baltics are still separate nations
No the slavic tribes absorbed all of the other tribes in the eastern slavic countries
@@Silver_PrussianBaltic and Estonians have Slavic r1a-m558 DNA which is commonly found in East Slavs, which means they admixed
The fun is that Bisantium (emperor Pheophil to Luis king of Frankia in 839 ad), arab, Persian monks have written chronicles about "Rus from Kyiv" merchants and raids to their lands even Before tale of "vikings coming to Ladoga in 862 ad". Furthermore, there is No evidences from archeologists, nor from chronicle that Novgorod was found at that time, but even the Ladoga was a small village.
Whats the song name at 5:00???!
the kievan russ was founded for oleg of novgorod ¬¬
According to the legend. In which dozens of inconsistencies. Prophetic Oleg is as legendary as Ragnar Lodbrok.
@@KrokoDildosthere is evidence that he attacked constantinople that I don't think is a legend
@@julioheath4213 There is no mention of this in Byzantium. For that, about Askold, whom he killed, they wrote about a campaign against Byzantium.
I love you Queen Olga!
Well done thanks
Fun fact Rurik,Oleg,Igor of Kiev, and Sviatoslav 1 were all staunch pagans that never converted so don't twist history. Also the Scandinavians were definitely not illiterate they had the runic scripts which are absolutely a writing system
I never said they converted.
Proud of your child sacrifice hereitage?
@@RealCrusadesHistory I never said you did
Fun fact: the Cyrillic alphabet still used today (please correct me if I’m wrong) was instituted by Saint Cyril, who converted all the Rus only a century after the events of the video. Also, where does the (fake) conversion of the Khazars fit into this narrative?
@@ChristianMChristian Vladimir 1 was the one who ordered the Rus to convert he was the son of Sviatoslav 1
Does Rus not mean red
Hello from Novgorod.
A Russian Viking?
Swedish and Fins are Jutes, Angles are Anglos and Norweigans as well. Sweds went east, Danes/Norwegians went down to the locations of even Mesopotamia. Saxons are Norse and are Germanic all have the same beliefs with some differences (Odinism and Wodenism). All Norse traded around all Eurasia and north Africa and the dates are found from Mammoth Tusks. Look at ancient Farthic and then look at other languages. The Germanic stretched from outside the Franks to the slavic regions.
Jutes are Danes, like the Geats. Swedes were Goths, Goets and Rus, Fins I can't remember.
I believe angels are not even Scandinavian, they were a German tribe.
@@alexsokolovsky1873 Scandinavians are mostly Germanic. The ugric and finnic people are the non-Germanic groups in Scandinavia.
@@MrMackievelli Scandinavians belong to North German branch of Germanic peoples. Jutes are one of the tribes that eventually became Danish. While Angeles were from a west Germanic peoples. (like their more famous nabours the Saxons)
@@alexsokolovsky1873 Yes, I know. That's why I said it.
the name "Rus" stems from the red or ginger hair.
yep. the "leader" nutcase conspiracy weirdos are fixated with it.
ginger chan Genghis Khan same thing.
Or skin, nordic peoples tend to get quite red under the sun ;)
@@andoapata2216 good thinking my friend.
i can confirm we go very red lol
in my 50yrs i have never had a sun tan.
@@andoapata2216 keep it up cringe apologist
Rus means paddle. I hope I helped ;)
Not
Up the creek without a paddle 😂 BS history
Say what? Rus is the Swedish word that is equivalent to rouse in English. I learned that long ago while working in Sweden.
Rus didn't come to Kyev, Rus' was Kyev and Chernihiv region. In the chronicles, The North lands were not called Rus' before the collapse of Rus', the North or Moscow region and other current Russian lands used to be under Rus' control as its colonies. The North or modern Moscow lands with Finno-ugric trips there were colonies of Rus'. That is why to name Moscow lands as Rus' is like to call India as England because India used to be under The Great Britain empire control.
My ancestors 💛💙
The idea that ships were set on fire when in water is hard to prove for obvious reasons, most common AFAIK was burying the ship with the man "on board" in the soil, I'm no expert but that's what I've read about eg the graves in Gamla Upsala, and I'm pretty sure that none of the ships there were burned
It would be so cool to discover a previously unknown recording of the history of Rus wars and events in the land that came to be Russia
Russia before 1721 didn’t exist, the duchy of muscovy 🙈😂
Basically the vikings have claim on Russia and Ukraine. Lets go claim that land in the best Putin "spirit".
So sweden belong to russia too?
@@lostplanet1931 No, the opposite!
As a Russian lets go, it will be an interesting fight
@@NUMMEHARBEN You could make the case either way. Just say that the Ruriks were actually also the true rulers of Sweden
You mean the vikings that were absorbed by the Russian population?
This is the first video amongst a dozen to note that a bunch of people inviting viking raiders to rule over them sounds a little sus. Maybe be a little history being written by the victors there.
Vikings never took slaves. They just rescued women and gold from villages which experienced spontaneously combustion
Nah, my Norse ancestors just built different 😏💪
Nordic people are built to rule 🗿
@@mattweir9674 Tbf the people that left to rule somewhere are more likely to be the ancestors of the people in that somewhere else
the vikings helped to establish unrecognized peoples republics
Founded by Scandinavian vikings.
The TV Series "Vikings" brought me here.
The way the Russians were shown in the series is terrible. Not only did they have Russian Christians before the baptism of Russia, but they also have Mongolian clothes
❤️👍👍👍
great grampa!
Glory to Kievan Rus'⚔⚔
Kievan Rus never existed. What is called «Kievan Rus» is a time period of Russia, actually. How much can you explain? Therefore, who do you wish victory to? 😃It's funny.
@@ОлегБобров-т7юRUS existed much more earlier than ruzzia appeared. Kiev is 1500 y.o. Moscow is only 850 y.o. Kiev, Chernigov, Pereyaslav, Galich etc. were most ancient cities of RUS and those cities are still in modern Ukraine
@@TheOlgaSasha Во-первых, не факт, что Киеву 1500 лет. Во-вторых, даже если бы и так, что с того? К тому же, а где в вашем списке Новгород, Смоленск, Ростов, Суздаль? Или это не города древней Руси, а? В чём, собственно, суть ваших претензий не улавливаю.
@@TheOlgaSasha Novgorod and Stara Ladoga are older that Kiev. All of them were part of same country, Rus or Russia. Word "Ukraine" came much later. Ukraine was never a country until 1992. Russia, Ukraine and Belarus will be one country again.
@@ОлегБобров-т7юit’s logical and written in History that Kiev is older than Moscow. You Russians hate that reality which is why you guys hate Ukrainians most likely
Ukraine? Has nothing to do with a nationality btw
That’s right
tribes who formed Ukraine
@@withoutwords8136 slavic Tribes calling themselves "Rus"
@@sparrowsbewertungen6930 not all of them, did it only those who lived near Chernihov, Pereyaslav and Kiev
@@withoutwords8136 well noone called himself Ukrainian
Those territories in ukraine that were not rus ... were mongol parts , later retaken lol
The word "rus" comes from the swedish word "rorsman" (the man who steers the ship). It was interpreteded as "rus-man", which is why the swedish viking became known as the "rus". The area in eastern Sweden where most vikings came from (as the arrows in the movie show) is known as Roslagen still today.
So Rus-sians are just swedes wannabees... 😂
In fact, Sweden is still called "Ruotsi" in Finnish and "Roots" in Estonian, as Roslagen would have been the closest part of Sweden with most contact to the Finns, there are millenia long contacts between these areas. Funnily enough, the modern name for Russia in Finnish in "Venäjä" which comes from the Venedi, a west slavic tribe on the southern shores of the Baltic Sea ("ryssä" is a derogatory term). Maybe this gives a hint from where (and when) the slavic people came to Russia. During the time of the Rus, northern Russia was pretty much Finnic speaking but the influence of Christianity (old Church slavic) caused these people to change their language during the next centuries. The problem with history often is that modern concepts and borders of nations are projected to the past.
Yes, Peter the Great really wanted to be Swed.
Rus is from Rurik which is who the people were named after.
Wasn't Sweden a wanna-be empire that got absolutely wrecked by the Russians?
Interesring! Never heard of that. In school we were taught that Rus was simply a name of Rurik's tribe
The Rus would go on to found a nation. Rus ia, Russia.
The kings of the viking age Sweden or Svearige, when going Viking, they could by law require rowers for the ships along the coast. This law was named"roslagen", directly translated the law of rowers. From this the slavs derived "ros" or "rus" and then Russia as the Swedes started dominating the land. Tor.
Russia didn’t exist until after 1721, the duchy of muscovy 🙈😂
@@viktormogilin307 россия уже была в 10 веке как слово и иван 3 в 15 веке был великий князь вся руси, его официальный титул и был он из рода Рюрика. Где тут Усраинцы ?
The russ are indoeuropean they are huns scythians diferent names same people . The slavs are not danish
Rus with a single s
Slavs are not Huns. Hungarians are descendants of Huns.
Sweden had a great influence on Russia about 1000-1200 years ago. It was common that in the elite of Kyiv-Rus or Novgorod -Rus that they had one, two or more swedish ancestors/relatives. As late as 14th c icelandic scribes called Rus area for "The great/big Sweden". Common cultural features still exists. F.ex. in eastern Sweden when older people see a black cat they still spit three times over left shoulder to stop misfortunes to happen, exactly what they do in Russia...Other similarites is a sacrifice to Tomte/Nisse or farmspirit, in Russia it´s called Domevoi. Both people used to put steel in cradle or threshold to stop Trolls or Lezji(treepeople) to steal the children...
Russia didn’t exist thousands years, Name Russia came to existence in 1721. This story is based on legends not historical facts. Too bad is spreading myths.
@@Capcarap333 Вот вы эти самые мифы как раз и распространяете. А России тысяча лет. Факт.
Kyiv Ruś has nothing to do with Muscovia, Novgorod that’s a legend, archeological findings place origins of Novgorod after Kyiv glorious times. Ruś is not todays Russia, Peter 1 only in 18 century adopted fraudulently Greek name Rossia for Moscovia. Ruś it is nowadays Ukraine.
@@Capcarap333 Хватит врать уже. У вас ни слова правды нет. Всё это разбивается просто.
@@ОлегБобров-т7ю правда колёт очи
come on the Vikings didn’t found Ukraine nor Russia… how possibly could they. Maybe it’s time for the Slavs to invite Norsemen again to rule upon them , cause certainly they are still not capable of doing that…
Truth is bitter.
Ukraine has a big problem with the corrupt dictator Zelensky. And the russian government is not that bad. Its at least better than the Swedish government
@@bastikolaski8111 Go away, Ivan.
@@tonya5818 🥱
Vikings they have no money
,,,,founders of Russ (Russia), don't twist the history
The the Russ are Russians were encouraged to build their first city and capital here. The regions around Kyiv is the original homeland of the Russ or rus tribes ,Russians existed here from prehistoric time over 20,000 years .
🇸🇪💙💛🇺🇦
This can be the reason why we got the same colours in the flags.
Haha tyst 🇸🇪💕🇷🇺
@@NUMMEHARBENno, it was random
Kyivan Rus
Kievan Rus. Kiyyvaav is Bandera Speech
Rurik (Lachyn) is from the Bulgar Dulo clan, descendant of Kubrat and Attila. He was never a viking. It's all written in Djagfar Tarihi.
Modern Ukraine is on the territory of Old Great Bulgaria (Urus Bulgar) , which in the 7th century divided into Khazaria, Avaria, Danube Bulgaria and Black Bulgaria (with Kyiv capital). In the 9th century after a Civil War Black Bulgaria (Kara Bulgar) divided into Volga Bulgaria (Ak Bulgar) and Kyiv Rus (Urus).
@Jotaro97 My brother in Christ, literally all evidence points to it. VIkings never used the trident tamga. The trident (Baltavar) was the arms of Dulo clan and a symbol of Bulgar statehood. Also as I said above, it's all written in Djagfar Tarihi, the lineage of Rurik, Attila etc. Half of these chronicles were destroyed by NKVD but we are lucky that the other half was saved and was kept in the so called Tatar SSR.
@@Bolghar_wolf Rurik literarly comes from the Swedish Norse name Hrodrick, as does Olga come from Helga
@@ionelflorea2116 Helga/Olga name is Uldjai. Everything is written in Djagfar Tarihi, check it man
@Jotaro97 there is big reasons and everyone who has actually read it knows it
Djagfar Tarihi is one of the most unreliable historical sources in history
So from what im understanding people from russia and Ukraine are descendents from Sweden
Only Russians are descendants of Swedes, Ukrainians are descendants of Poles.
@@felix2000-h7gUkrainians are not descendants of Poles. It is nonesense. Modern so-called "russians" are in fact a mix of moscowians, novgorodians and 30 other not Slavic (Turkic, Ugro-Finnic etc) peoples which were officially called "Russia" only in times of Peter I in 18th century. Kiev was and remains "the mother of Rus' cities" (as it was always called in chronicles)
@@TheOlgaSasha Rus is Russia. So called "Ukrainians" are mixture of Russians, and minorities in today Ukraine (Hungarians, Poles, Bulgarians, etc...). There was never a "Ukraine" country until 1991.
😂😂😂 Ukraine isn't not Rus 🇷🇺
All Vikings were blond and people started calling them RUS, because on Bulgarian rus means blond.
Not true. Even in my family some have brown eyes, dark skin and it's just a myth all are blond.
@@shar3066 You have Roman blood, brother, and that's weird
@@عليياسر-ذ5بThere are plenty of first hand accounts of red and brown haired Vikings.
@@عليياسر-ذ5ب Roman blood is far more glorious than viking blood
@@rayzas4885
What's wrong with viking blood?
Being a Swede I always thought that these forefathers are despicable and disgusting, but this presentation also makes them ludicrously despicable and disgusting. I thank you for that. I have some fantasy authoring in my mind.
Swe Power
It is not vikings that enslaved the slavic peoples. The slavic peoples ARE vikings.
J3ws enslaved the slavs and traded them. This account is a fiction to scapegoat vikings for the crimes of Jewry. The viking population of Ukraine was enslaved by J3wish slavers operating from their Byzantine Judeo-christian empire.
You are despicable and disgusting
are you ok?
You sound soft
Ra, Re, Ri, Ro, and Ru are root words for REd in RA, HeRA, HoRI, ROse, JeRUsalem, HoRUs, RUssian, and over half of the languages on earth.
The RU in Russ means Red.
No, in most Slavic languages "Rus" means Blonde. Check in Google Translate.
Русь в повести временньІх лет бьІла извесна еще до Рюрика, -В год 6360 (852), индикта 15, когда начал царствовать Михаил, стала прозываться Русская земля. Узнали мы об этом потому, что при этом царе приходила Русь на Царьград,
И вся ета история о том што рюрик принес название "Русь" придумали только из одного неправильно переведенного слова "пояши" в летописи)))
Скажу в двух словах. Во-первых, не была Русь, как государство, до прихода варягов. Во-вторых, а что слово *«пояши»* должно по-вашему означать, как «правильно» оно должно переводиться?
@@ОлегБобров-т7ю Во всех остальньІх случаях слово пояши переведено как приняли, -приняли по себе всю русь также как напимер приняли правление в руси в своих наделах сьІньІ ВолодьІмьІра Мономаха а младшенькому-уродцу у которого маменька половчанка отпрввили куда подальше с глаз долой в леса залешанские.
@@ОлегБобров-т7ю ВьІ плохо знаете истрию Руси, на византию походами ходили а государственности небьІло))) гардарика -страна городов (змиевьІе вальІ протяженностю 2000км) существовали но государства небьІло.
А как вьІ обясните што например о всех достоверно извесньІх описаниях Киевских князьях линии рюрика о них описания как о русинах а не как о вьІходцах из скандинавов.
А "пояши" во всех других случаях переведено как приняли , -приняли по себе всю русь также например как приняли всю русь дети ВолодЬІмьІра мономаха.
@@ОлегБобров-т7ю А тут еще например Кирило тот што Кирило и Мефодий когда прибьІл в Корсунь то тогда он видел евангелие написаньІе на "роський мови" и общался с роським монахом, предствляешь себе такое, руси с ваших слов нет а письменность и книги есть)))
Rus is Russia, it began in Novgorod
Yes, a Swede told me founders of today Ukraine, Russia were Varangians 🇸🇪 Vikings Rus; means in 🇫🇮 to row Viking boats. At Kievan Rus, first tribes Derebyany (woods people), Polovtsi, sarmathians, Siveryany, & Ulichi. Vikings were family Rurik
Kyivan Rus