I Bought an Aircraft Company! at Age 25 | BREAKING NEWS! Bearhawk Aircraft Sells to Virgil Irwin!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.พ. 2024
  • 👇🏼 👇🏼👇🏼 Click "SHOW MORE" to see the LINKS Below! ✈️✈️✈️
    Link to Bearhawk's website:
    www.bearhawkaircraft.com/
    ‪@BearhawkAircraft‬
    Please follow us on Facebook where we post nearly daily:
    / experimentalaircraftch...
    Check out our NEW WEBSITE!
    experimentalaircraftchannel.com/
    #experimentalaircraft #experimentalaircraftchannel #bearhawk
    ***SUBSCRIBE Right Now to Experimental Aircraft Channel
    (It's FREE) and get exclusive offers below!
    Our "Sister" Podcast Channel on TH-cam: / @eacaviationpodcast9668
    Please visit our Channel Sponsors here:
    *Dynon Avionics (Avionics for Experimental, Certified and Light Sport Aircraft)
    dynonavionics.com/
    *Wide Open Door Company (Specializing in quality metal doors including Hangar Doors!) www.wideopendoorco.com/
    *Warp Drive Propellers (Solid carbon fiber blades for your propeller needs in Ultralight, Light Sport, Experimental Aircraft) warpdriveinc.com/
    *Pioneer Control Grips (Custom stick grips the controls in your Aircraft. Many styles to choose from) www.pioneercontrolgrips.com/
    *South Mississippi Light Aircraft (Official Rotax Repair and Training Center)
    flysmla.com/
    *Edge Performance (High Performance Aircraft Engines)
    www.edgeperformance.no/
    Please visit our Affiliates Here:
    **Flying Eyes Optics - 10% Off Use Code: EXPERIMENTAL
    flyingeyesoptics.com/eyewear/...
    Join the NEW Facebook GROUP where we encourage "Say it With VIDEO" build updates on YOUR current project:
    / experimentalaircraftch...
    And we are on INSTAGRAM too!
    / experimentalaircraftch...
    WE HAVE A PODCAST! Audio only can be found on iTune, GooglePlay and Podbean. Fill VideoPodcast (V-Podcast) on TH-cam by searching "EAC Aviation Podcast" or click: / @eacaviationpodcast9668
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 108

  • @philipritson8821
    @philipritson8821 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Good luck Virgil.
    Thanks for the interview Bryan.

  • @5thGenNativeTexan
    @5thGenNativeTexan 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Congrats! Great aircraft. A friend built a Four with a Lyc 540 in it. Was a monster bushplane and great long-distance traveler.

  • @TheBaldPilot
    @TheBaldPilot 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    From a proud Bearhawk builder, great to see this transition from Mark to Virgil. I'm sure the company will be in good hands. Congrats Virgil! Can't wait to see what the future brings for you, your family, and Bearhawk. And thank you you to my friend Bryan for this great interview!

  • @Joe_Not_A_Fed
    @Joe_Not_A_Fed 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Virgil's enthusiasm is contagious. Congrats.

  • @DuneMoose5
    @DuneMoose5 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    You two look like father and son here. That aside, it's great to see a new generation owner who is bringing a lot to the table and it's impressive. I think the future of Bearhawk Aircraft is in good hands and that bodes well for all current and future customers. Thank you, Virgil!

  • @kevingrosshandler5308
    @kevingrosshandler5308 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I’ve been set on building a BH for years. I’ve watched every one of Virgil’s videos more than once. This is great news.

    • @philipritson8821
      @philipritson8821 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He has a big "to do" list on his hands though.
      I wish him well.

  • @hillcrestannie
    @hillcrestannie 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Thanks for the video interview.
    I own a C170 and for years have considered getting a BearHawk.
    The only thing that has kept me from it is the build time. With the builder assist I might get one now .

  • @JasonRidesmoto
    @JasonRidesmoto 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Man I've been looking into the Bearhawk patrol for awhile now. I love the useful load and cruise speeds.

  • @sirnewton6874
    @sirnewton6874 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Great video, Virgil has youthful energy. It will be exciting to see Bob Barrows legacy continue.

  • @jcmcclain57
    @jcmcclain57 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Very impressed, thank you for the interview!

  • @johnelliott4521
    @johnelliott4521 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Hopefully you will produce a kit with the features of the one you built

  • @chasejohnson1122
    @chasejohnson1122 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I cant think of a more worthy candidate for owning bearhawk. very intelligent and genuine guy!
    Id love to see an engine mount for the auto psru LS3 on the model 5! also mounts for viking honda engines for the small planes

    • @holl0918
      @holl0918 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The AutoPSRUs LS-3 on the M5 would be a KILLER package! I'm debating between that and the M-14PM on a Murphy Moose, but if I could get it on the M5 that would be fantastic.

  • @SkyRayden100
    @SkyRayden100 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Great to have new blood in the industry! I got my sight on a Bearhawk 4 or 5 build in a couple of years when I retire.

  • @leecoleman822
    @leecoleman822 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Congratulations 🏁

  • @doncatchpole
    @doncatchpole 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Congrats. Good luck.

  • @oscarwilson5953
    @oscarwilson5953 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Congratulations and good luck, my buddy and member of our EAA chapter 1515 is building a Bearhawk almost complete with it. Great plane.

  • @Rustlerbear
    @Rustlerbear 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great content. Thank you both.

  • @rallyit671
    @rallyit671 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Congrats on the purchase. The 5 looks very cool.

  • @openoutlaw
    @openoutlaw 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video. I did not feel that it was too long. A lot of great info Brian.

  • @huhguy5
    @huhguy5 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Congrats. Good things for good people. Helping others.

  • @s.venkateswarpatnaik2484
    @s.venkateswarpatnaik2484 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I liked your discussion on latest happenings in LAC✈️✈️✈️

  • @Talasas
    @Talasas 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Super fascinating aircraft and I've found the videos he's been posting really interesting to watch. Congrats!

  • @blakesundbye2137
    @blakesundbye2137 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Holy cow this is cool! I want a kit even more now!

  • @Daniel-np1wb
    @Daniel-np1wb 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I am glad to see this line keep going. Congratulations. I really like the bearhawk and have been watching for years while trying to get to where I could afford one in money and time. I was almost there but shocked at how quickly and how much the price for a kit has increased. For me, that is a bummer, but for those that can afford it, it is great to see the enthusiasm and fresh ideas to this plane. Thanks for the interview.

  • @philipritson8821
    @philipritson8821 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I dont care what anyone says.
    I think the Companion is the best Bearhawk of the lot!

  • @grannyblinda
    @grannyblinda 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video, great interview, great plane, great new owner! All the best to you all!

  • @ShParsons
    @ShParsons 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I’ve had my eye on Virgil for a while now… The depth and breadth of his knowledge for only 25 years makes him a rather young aviators “old soul”. The fact that HE is the new owner of BearHawk bodes well for both.
    Looking into my crystal ball 15 years into the future I see us sitting around exclaiming - “I remember when he bought the company after building their first 5. Who knew what it would turn into!”
    😊

  • @LoopyAg02
    @LoopyAg02 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Virgil is doing a great job with Bearhawk. Just took delivery of Companion #14.
    Also noticed the National STOL schedule over your right shoulder.
    Looking forward to seeing you at the competitions.

    • @philipritson8821
      @philipritson8821 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes a Companion builder.
      A very underestimated aircraft in my view.
      There's a thread on the Bearhawk forum where someone asks "Why build a Companion? It's nothing more than a detuned four place. Build the four place instead.
      Oh no! It is much more than detuned four place.
      Name me one contemporary two seater side-by-side design that does more the Lycoming 0-360.
      I'd have it and an RV-7 or RV-8 in my hangar any day.
      It's a gem of an aircraft.

  • @mattgirgenti3595
    @mattgirgenti3595 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very cool and happy for for Virgil and Bearhawk. I have followed both from their beginnings and could not be more impressed with both of them. Very excited .. and really hope some of the Virgils customizations of the 5 become standard (cargo pod and yes LOVE the Carbon work he did). Dreaming of that assist center. Really like the approach and timeline.
    For the 5, my biggest 'likes' are the speed range as mentioned, and the quick interior reconfigure. My primary missions are family flights within 450nm radius , Pilot-n-Paws flights, and disaster resupply flights. The model 5 fits all of those almost perfectly. Easily swap between people and cargo. (except I still want AC and maybe BRS .. because its hot here in S Texas!!)

  • @travisminneapolis
    @travisminneapolis 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Cool to hear the story❤

  • @rustusandroid
    @rustusandroid 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Work with Viking and get a good reliable modern engine in there. I think you will sell a lot more and a better price.

  • @AviationWP
    @AviationWP 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is so cool! I've watched Virgil build the 5!

  • @johnelliott4521
    @johnelliott4521 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good to hear, may suggest a kit with all the mods you put on yours.

  • @stevemyers2092
    @stevemyers2092 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I am very happy you have the company! I watched your videos and YOU sold me on the Bearhawk, no one else made me think this is the plane I want for the reasons I want one. I am too old and busy to be building one unfortunately, so I will be looking to buy a 4 or a 5. I need to fly both to make a final decision a year or 2 from now. The Bearhawk is my choice due to what you said STOL + 4X stall ability. I live in BC Canada, so high altitude lakes are abundant = turbo engine plus it will be sitting on amphib floats as well. Prefer to go 130ish MPH with floats than 100. Constant speed w/Beta Prop sounds awesome. Just heard you say you will welcome demo rides at the end of your video - so that's good - I wouldn't/couldn't do it any other way. 2 questions: 1) nice to have a wide deep (as large as possible with a warning about weight) shelf going past the rear bulkhead and into the rear fuselage for skis/fishing rods/sleeping bags/pillows light stuff to keep them out of the seating space. 2) What about a belly pod with a bladder for extra fuel/on floats? Have you seen a kit builder in Quebec has patented part of a wing/airfoil that spans the spreader bars of the floats - apparently it reduces stall by a good margin because it flies, like when you put the Vortex generators on that gave you a reduced stall speed - I cannot find the video I saw a few weeks ago - but i have sent an email out to one quebec kit company, Dream Aviation, if it's not him then he will likely know who and I will email you - Seemed Legit when I saw it on the floats ;-) be well SteveInVancouver

  • @travisminneapolis
    @travisminneapolis 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I would likely opt for the build assist.

  • @ethanlegrand33
    @ethanlegrand33 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great interview! I’ve always liked the Bearhawks. Always thought I’d build something cheaper for my first plane, but after seeing this interview I might have to just save for a few more years and get one

  • @bt1959
    @bt1959 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Bearhawk is one of the few kits i am interested in

  • @bradycope2332
    @bradycope2332 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome!!!

  • @Bearhawk_Life
    @Bearhawk_Life 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Another Great video Bryan. And no it was not too long. I chose BH for exactly what Virgil said, the wide speed envelope. My companion will be done soon

  • @chrispydeeks8370
    @chrispydeeks8370 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So he is in my hometown ? I wondered who was in fairview I pass by every day

  • @Dwade689
    @Dwade689 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Play the drinking game, drink a shot every time Virgil says “ umm” 😆

  • @grantgerrard177
    @grantgerrard177 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bear hawk is definitely my dream plane

  • @clarencehopkins7832
    @clarencehopkins7832 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Heck yeah 💪🇺🇸

  • @independentcontractor1633
    @independentcontractor1633 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Congratulations. I have two dumb questions. Can tbe rear doors be removed to airdrop bundles? Can it be used in a commercial business? Thank you so much.

  • @flysport_tedder
    @flysport_tedder 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm really stoked for Virgil, I'm really happy this mold-breaking kit company is doing well, but I had hoped the "I" in "I bought an aircraft company" was Brian.

  • @mcorrive12
    @mcorrive12 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I know opinions are like a**holes but I'll offer mine anyway. I think it's great to see some young blood entering the industry! As a millennial wannabe builder the bearhawk 4 meets all of my flight envelope specs but the kit itself keeps me away. I don't like the idea of working with toxic chemicals and tube and fabric. Id really like to see the bearhawk 4 specs in an all aluminum match hole drilled, final size, pull rivet kit with a 1200 hour build time like some of the other more refined kits on the market. I'd also love to see it powered by a more affordable Viking engine. They have so many of those engines flying nowadays, and now that they have a number of more powerful models, I'd love to see them on bearhawks.
    Another ideal kit would be a Murphy Radical with a slightly higher cruise speed. But again, their kit is less refined than some competitors and their build community is smaller than some others, so my concern would be build support.
    These are just some reasons I would build other kits before building a Murphy or Bearhawk. That said, none of those other kits currently have a 4 seater like Murphy or Bearhawk. So the decision is, do i go with the performance specs and 4 seats I want, or do i go with the low build time all aluminum refined kit that I want?
    Best of luck to Bearhawk! More competition in the market benefits all of us! Love to see it!

    • @sledawgpilot
      @sledawgpilot 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You can cover the fuselage with Oratex.

    • @philipritson8821
      @philipritson8821 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I don't see what the proposed RV-15 has to offer that a Bearhawk doesn't offer other than an aluminium feusilage.
      Seriously, a Bearhawk Four without the back seats or Companion is a better fit for the mission the proposed RV-15 is supposed to fulfill from where I sit!

    • @Austinmediainc
      @Austinmediainc 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The Murphy Radical is not a comparison to the Bearhawk 4. Both seem like great airples but different from all aspects. Radical is a 2 plus 2. The Murphy Radical kit is actually very refined and was made to offer a very simple kit, it's also all metal vs fabric and the Firat Radical built only had a cruise of just over 100 mph.....both great aircraft but again very different. The 4 cruises faster and is a true 4 seater.

    • @sledawgpilot
      @sledawgpilot 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@philipritson8821 steel tube fuselages have saved pilots. Bob Barrows’ design philosophy makes sense. Personally I’d be interested in a Rotax LSA. Auto fuel is nice and the bigger slower turning prop would probably improve the climb even more.

    • @philipritson8821
      @philipritson8821 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bob Barrows's steel cages are far more robust than those found on Kitfoxes, Highlanders, Rans, etc. aircraft.
      Of course robust comes at a weight penalty.
      Throw in an O-200 and the LSA becomes a very heavy aircraft indeed.
      Personally, I'd register the LSA as an Experimental at 1500 pounds.
      That said, Mosaic will give this design a new lease of life!

  • @jonathanhutchens7379
    @jonathanhutchens7379 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Will there ever be a chance of a GM LS engine? I’m a former GM tech. I’ve been looking at a Moose for a while, but I’m a fan of Bearhawk now with Virgil at the helm.

  • @brentmcmahon8188
    @brentmcmahon8188 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That small turbin built by Rolls Royce in Indiana would be the berry’s and tha small turbin has a wide Hp range.

  • @zachminchew814
    @zachminchew814 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Congratulations Virgil! We are coming along great with the model 5 we are building. This is awesome! I’m happy for you!

  • @KirkHortel
    @KirkHortel 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Delta hawk in the Patrol?

  • @user-qd6yg3rd8k
    @user-qd6yg3rd8k 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Congratulations, I wish you the very best for the future. Your ideas sound great. I turned from buying a Bearhawk kit, years ago, to buy a sportsman kit at Oshkosh. The attitude of the previous owner turned me off. I bought the plans a few years before at Oshkosh from the designer and mind was set to buy a kit.

  • @jacobray6655
    @jacobray6655 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I want to see some data with that turboprop!!!

  • @whitetrashgarage8110
    @whitetrashgarage8110 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Will there still be the option to plans build?
    Some people enjoy building and dont want to spend a premium for someone elses work...
    The lsa is likely my next build after my Sonerai

    • @ExperimentalAircraftChannel
      @ExperimentalAircraftChannel  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Plans are still available through the original design of the BearHawk and always have been. Bob Barrows.

    • @whitetrashgarage8110
      @whitetrashgarage8110 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ExperimentalAircraftChannel Great news!

  • @JesseOaks-ef9xn
    @JesseOaks-ef9xn 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My question is how do you coordinate between sub assemblies from Mexico and the FAA in the US?

    • @philipritson8821
      @philipritson8821 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's experimental avaition. The FAA only requires that the builder does more than 51% of the work and a Designated Airworthiness Representative issues a Certificate of Airworthiness.
      The FAA don't care where the components come from.

    • @EllipsisAircraft
      @EllipsisAircraft 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is an experimental aircraft. The FAA doesn't care if you try to fly in a wet paper airplane. Only that you built it and register it with them, and give them the fee money.

  • @dabneyoffermein595
    @dabneyoffermein595 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    this is considered experimental correct? I do not need a medical to fly this , correct? What flight training can I get from Bearcat?

    • @ExperimentalAircraftChannel
      @ExperimentalAircraftChannel  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This is a BearHawk. It is Experimental for MOST of their offerings. Their entry level (if you will ) model is the "LSA" which still require sort of a medical but easier to get IF you haven't been denied a 3rd Class at any time. It's called "BASIC MED." Look that up and learn the details. It's a good option. I'm sure some transition training will be offered in the future. Thanks for watching!

  • @micus09
    @micus09 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Were there not thousands of Wilga's built...?

    • @travisminneapolis
      @travisminneapolis 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There were many Wilgas built, but only #1 Draco custom.

  • @justinparker7795
    @justinparker7795 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Awesome ! Think about Viking aircraft engines on the evaporate kit.

    • @philipritson8821
      @philipritson8821 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Evaporate kit?

    • @justinparker7795
      @justinparker7795 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hell I don't even know what I'm sayen! Viking Engine on your smallest Kit.

  • @renardinosrenard9581
    @renardinosrenard9581 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Next generation owners, probably next generation aircrafts ? Hope so ❤

    • @philipritson8821
      @philipritson8821 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      All the Bearhawks were designed by a man who is currently in his seventies!
      The youngest CEO in the industry in a symbiotic relationship with the oldest active designer in the industry!

  • @gendaminoru3195
    @gendaminoru3195 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    BTW, what's happening to VANs'? Are they still in business or did the consulting company kill them off?

    • @philipritson8821
      @philipritson8821 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They're still in Business.
      Massive price increases. Existing builders being told to pay those higher prices from now on or take your chances for a refund of any unfulfilled payments made to-date as an unsecured creditor if things go "tits up."
      What a dilemma. A current builder is not quite into "sunk cost territory" where the most rational thing to do is to write your investment in your build off. Most will just pay the higher prices.

    • @gendaminoru3195
      @gendaminoru3195 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@philipritson8821 My advice & $.02 is to let them go belly up [cptr7] and let a white knight come in [we know a few suitors] to the BK hearings and scoop up the assets and do it before the Chinese send in someone to sew up a Cirrus competitor. They did this on another OEM I was interested in salvaging - Commander. But there's no reason to leave everyone holding the bag on this one. I know people that would try to make it as seamless as possible to keep the dream alive of owner build performance with no China.

    • @EllipsisAircraft
      @EllipsisAircraft 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hey; everybody in America it seemed loved aluminum tariffs, and inflation. They just cant handle the abstract concept these are the consequences of decisions made 6-8 years ago.

  • @916medic
    @916medic 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey Virgil can you just give me a free kit. It's a long shot but it's worth a try. I want to build one with my 7 year son, He thinks your model 5 is the best thing in the world. He loves the color blue you have.

  • @battshytkrazy156
    @battshytkrazy156 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Luck 2u SIR!!!😮🎉

  • @thegreatest1540
    @thegreatest1540 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Don't Trust VERIFY!! - You must be a Bitcoin guy! Much love brotha!

  • @kylegoldston
    @kylegoldston 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So... Is Bearhawk aircraft now part of a Missionary organization?

    • @ExperimentalAircraftChannel
      @ExperimentalAircraftChannel  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No. Two separate entities. Why?

    • @kylegoldston
      @kylegoldston 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@ExperimentalAircraftChannel Honestly, I'm not a fan of Missionary orgs.
      Considering what's going on in America right now, if anyone wanted to help they have several lifetimes of work in America.
      Traveling so far to deceive people seems foolish and misguided.
      I'm a minority though so feel free to disregard my opinion.
      PS, sorry about brushing up against your fragility but you did ask and I've decided to just be honest.

    • @ExperimentalAircraftChannel
      @ExperimentalAircraftChannel  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@kylegoldston honesty... is ALWAYS the best option. I am not all that fragile. I read the "Comments Section" for a living now. 😀Thanks. I agree... there is PLENTY of work to be done right here on American soil (especially right now). However, there is work to be done around the world as well. And different people have hearts for different things. I would however, challenge your thoughts on deception. The TRUTH is available.

    • @kylegoldston
      @kylegoldston 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ExperimentalAircraftChannel Truth is only available the hard way, it seems lately.
      All is seen, though.

  • @krishnamohan6260
    @krishnamohan6260 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The real question is, 'How much did you pay for it?'.

  • @LTVoyager
    @LTVoyager 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice video, but far too long. This would have been a great video had it been more focused and 20-30 minutes long.

    • @philipritson8821
      @philipritson8821 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I disagree.

    • @cdeanda
      @cdeanda 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Just play it at 1.5x or more. Great video!

    • @LTVoyager
      @LTVoyager 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@cdeanda Did that for a while, but still too tedious so just stopped after a while. Too many other things to watch that get to the point more quickly.

    • @travisminneapolis
      @travisminneapolis 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@LTVoyagerI had to pause and start it again later, but its cool to hear the whole conversation.

    • @Lt_Tragg
      @Lt_Tragg 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Its true. Many us here are working full-time, building, raising families, involvement with EAA, flying, maintaining our aircraft and on and on. Far too busy to afford the time to plant our butts down for hr long content productions.

  • @moronews2582
    @moronews2582 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You keep talking about Mark? Bob Barrows designed all of the bearhawk line. everyone of them. Bob is the owner of Bearhawk!

    • @philipritson8821
      @philipritson8821 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No Bob Barrows is the designer of these aircraft. If you want to scratch build a Bearhawk you order the plans from Bob.
      Mark saw the potential in the four and built the kit business from the ground up around that aircraft.
      Bob went on to design the Patrol, the LSA, the Companion and the Five, which Mark then offered in kit format too. I imagine Bob gets a royalty on every Bearhawk kit sold, but at the end of the day how Bob is remunerated for his design effort is none of my business.
      But Bearhawk does not belong to Bob Barrows . It now belongs to Virgil Irwin and his wife.

    • @chrisdurham8778
      @chrisdurham8778 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That’s a great simplification of the process that resulted in the Bearhawk kit and associated corporation. It was not that simple, and not the result of Mark just working hard to do what no one else had thought of. A great deal of effort and money was expended by people not named Mark long before he put his stamp on the company. In fact, the development of the kit making company fractured the Bearhawk community and drove the original scratch builders who truly built the foundation on which the kit builders stood away. And to say the Bearhawk does not belong to Bob is just silly. It’s a point that doesn’t need to be made and way off base. Mark wouldn’t have had anything to work with without Bob. And you yourself listed all the variants Bob has added to the stable, all the while saying, what, that they aren’t his?

    • @netpackrat
      @netpackrat หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@chrisdurham8778 Complicated is a good word to describe what happened. To be honest, Mark himself was a big part of driving some of us away. If I ever resume my project, I would again consider buying kit parts if Mark is truly out of it.

    • @netpackrat
      @netpackrat หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@philipritson8821 Unless the arrangement has changed, you cannot buy a Bearhawk kit unless you first buy the plans from Bob.

  • @moronews2582
    @moronews2582 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So no more plans scratch build bearhawks?

    • @philipritson8821
      @philipritson8821 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You order plans from Bob Barrows directly, not from Bearhawk Aircraft.