Automated Ball-Strike Challenge System in Action!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ส.ค. 2024
- Here are 8 borderline pitches that were challenged and immediately reviewed during Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp home games (Marlins Triple-A affiliate). Do you want to see something like this implemented in the big leagues?
Pitch 1: pitcher Louis Head, hitter Jacob Amaya, catcher John Hicks
Pitch 2: Trey Cobb, Austin Allen, John Hicks
Pitch 3: Jesús Cruz, Jacob Amaya, John Hicks
Pitch 4: Chris Vallimont, C.J. Hinojosa, Anthony Bemboom
Pitch 5: Robert Garcia, Colton Cowser, Austin Allen
Pitch 6: Dillon Tate, Jerar Encarnación, Anthony Bemboom
Pitch 7: Archie Bradley, Colton Cowser, Santiago Chávez
Pitch 8: Logan Gillaspie, Santiago Chávez, Maverick Handley
Become a Super Subscriber: bit.ly/FOFSupe...
Complete Miami Marlins coverage: fishonfirst.com/
This is really cool! This the perfect system for me. We need an ump making the calls, but let players challenge just like this. And it will evolve so players get better at knowing what to challenge because a few of these challenges are clearly a waste
This is what Tim McCaffrey has said for years. I'm not a fan of the ABS, but this I can get behind 100%.
Can't wait to see this in the majors.
Yep.
each team only gets 3 per game, so this won't be happening all game.
@daveborn1971 That's a start. Save them for most crucial times
@@daveborn1971should be 1 challenge per at bat, or 3 an inning
this is incredible. i think its worth adding a couple extra minutes worth of time to each game to get the utmost accuracy, while also preventing arguments and unnecessary ejections. keeps everyone happy.
Oh yeah, this is the way to go!
It's actually entertaining.
..In fact though, it would be better if the Home Plate Umpire was given an immediate signal through an earpiece from the automated strike zone system.
I've seen this type of system used in Cricket ... it's fantastic
We NEED THISS
Why can’t they just signal the Umpires ear piece with the call, immediately? Why is the challenge necessary? Just “ding” the left ear for a ball and the right ear for a strike…🤔
Whether you agree with it or not it is to add drama to the process. Also the graphic this year tells you how far off the plate the pitch is.
because the computer can't make the call *immediately*, it takes time for the data to process. it's not a lot of time, just a couple of seconds, but in practice that's too long to wait on every single pitch
A note that I think the number of challenges is limited. So we are seeing a bunch here but normally you'd see fewer.
If they win the challenge they don’t loose any right. So it could stay at 3 2 or 1 challenge for ahwile
This was from different games as each team gets 3 per game!
if the system is good enough to be 99% accurate I'd prefer for the system to make the call. It would suck to not have a challenge and have a really bad pitch end a game. Or feel like you don't want to waste one early. either way it will be an improvement for the game.
The issue is that the system takes a while, so it would extend games by a lot which would counter everything they’ve been trying to do with shortening games. Having a limited number of challenges adds strategy to it instead of challenging everything
@@fredfishmonger the challenge only comes into play when humans are calling BB/K. I'm in favor of having the robo ump call all BB/K calls with no challenges
@@alexthegod2 like is said, the system takes a while to determine if a pitch is a strike or ball, however long a single challenge takes is how long every call would take with this system
@@fredfishmonger the newest system is instant now no delays
@@fredfishmonger it takes 5 seconds for the system to show the replay.. that's not a while
MLB would likely reject it because: 1) It would slow the game, 2) It would further remove "the human element" and 3) It would immediately put Angel Rodriguez out of a job.
it takes 5 seconds for the challenge.. that does not slow the game down. just like the pitch clock. it speeds up the game and makes the games quicker so you get out of there in 2:30 hours
Angel Hernandez wouldn't be out of a job. He'll be instantly corrected and will HOPEFULLY adjust and correct his strike zone for the rest of the game.
@DanielOrteez Angel Hernandez and correcting calls are in completely different ballparks, because he won't be an official after 2024 xD
@@DanielOrteez I honestly thing he just has horrible peripheral vision out of his right eye. Not sure that's fixable.
This is Angel Hernandez proof
the game would be 5 hrs long when angel hernandez is behind the plate. everyone of his pitches will be challenged.
@@rwwilson21 You can't challenge check swing calls.
@@MEATBALLmonty I'm not talking about check swings. I'm just talking about his pitch calling.
read my comment.
Tried to reply to OP so said the game will be Angel Hernandez proof. It won't.
I like the automated but there has to be consequences for wrongful challenges or a limit to how etc etc
There is they lose a challenge
I think every call will be challenged and drag the game out to 6 hours lol, they may need to put a limit of times you can challenge, if you lose one you're out of challenges.
this is definitely great to see, but what the fuck is that virtual strike zone? homies are 6 foot 3 and the strike zone is literally a small box. i think we need to focus on defining the strike zone for each batter more accurately and implementing that into the computer algorithm
Yeah it’s cool but player are going to be constantly asking for a review it should be set how many time each team can review a call. Like 10 review for each team
Nope they will get 3 per game
why on earth did Austin Allen challenge this?
In KBO all calls AI every calls now..
is there going to be any point for catchers to frame pitches anymore?
Depends on what system they decide to use full time. With the challenge system, your team only has 3 chances in the game to review pitches. That still leaves other borderline pitches where framing could make a difference. But framing would become less valuable overall, yeah.
Nope!
No challenge needed..
Just all calls by AI...
DAF
Why not just let the computer tell the ump what the call is and save a lot of time.
I’ve seen the computer make incorrect ball-strike calls in minor league games. I like this as a compromise until a roboump is infallible.
@@TheKuLeR Are the mistakes at least consistant? What we have now is ridiculous. You never know what the umps are going to call.
@@bryanb5895 I'd say the errors are probably consistent. What I've seen most often are slightly but definitely below the bottom of the zone being called strikes. Might be caused by the heights of certain batters? Still a work in progress.
@@TheKuLeR Consistency would be a major change for the better. At least the hitters and the pitchers would have something consistent to work with.
@@TheKuLeR theyre clearly making mistakes because that strike zone is insanely small for someone who is over 6 feet tall. when did the strike zone become a small box? i thought that was only for short batters lol
This thing will be over ruling Angel Hernandez every pitch. MLB clone Pat Hoberg.
Never will make it to the majors
This just slows the game down and is dumb.....
A lot better than idiotic umps making idiotic calls.
Your comment makes no sense because game time has been drastically reduced since the pitch clock was implemented.
Well, we still got the pitch clock so we break even
Also, sorry to add on to this but if a walk is converted into a strikeout, it will actually speed up the game.
Swing the damn bat
Remember the end of Planet of the Apes when Carlton Heston saw Lady Liberty.... that's what I'm doing in front of my monitor right now....
It reminds me of Troy McClure in the final scene.
Or just hire umpires that aren't shit.
I don’t like this already