nice test, but as an idea of improvement, you should definitely do a 5g data test, because that is one very important thing on a phone, especially nowadays.
For me the 5G speed is not that interesting. As long as I can stream videos I am a happy man. The main advantage with 5G is the number of users . But if you want to download e.g large games via mobile, then 5G speed matters.
I rock an s24 ultra and an iphone 16 pro max for daily use and i can tell you that the iphone lacks in 5g performance. It's the worst of the bunch. Disappointing.
I think the Oppo Find X8 Pro would've been a better choice to represent the Dimensity 9400. The Vivo X200 Pro seems less focus on raw power and has most of its resources focused on the camera.
Vivo is an os with very optimized reputation, but china's Iqoo Neo 10 Pro flagship all around as subbrand of vivo is even more smoother because of origin os so this will be a better representator
@@11-descartesrasheedjermain53 The X200 Pro is literally scoring lower in synthetic benchmarks than the Find X8 Pro. I don't normally give them synthetic benchmarks that much credit, but considering it's 2 phones with the same chip, I think it's a fair comparison.
I'm currently using the iPhone 16 Pro Max and the Vivo X200 Pro right now and both are absolute units. You can't really go wrong with flagships these days to be honest. It's pretty much nitpicking at this point.
doesnt even make sense to have 2 flagships and use them to any sort of "stress" level IF you have these, you're more likely to use 1 over the other what is it
@@FJaypewpewyeah, of course he's bragging. Even rich people wouldn't buy 2 flagship phones in such a close timeframe to use as their daily driver and secondary phone. Atleast, if he ia a smartphone reviewer, I might still believe him a little. He doesnt seems like that. But, I agree with his statement. Right now, there is no wrong flagship. It's just that some users misinterpret their needs. For example, someone who needs multitasking buy an iPhone, or someone who wants a good camera buy an ROG phone
@arondyte318 I have the s23 ultra and it has good stabilization but some inconsistencies in video in noise and color in low light and certain conditions
The video rendering test was very good… Normally people use Adobe Rush for testing. And, they don't even explain that, there are some compatibility issues with Android. But you explain it very well… Some apps are more optimize for iOS and some are for Android.
Ios is limiting it to 60fps because it's just small software tricks to save battery, like what they do for example of slow scrolling basically delaying your swipe so it can look "smooth" and only giving you 80hz
80fps hoax has been debunk many times, and u clearly dint know what u are talking about, IOS doesnt have the ability to limiting game FPS in order to "save" battery life, rather than the game developer dint include 120fps mode on IOS. the other hand, lots of Chinese phone have this features call "MEMC" frame insertion or "game mode" that purposely dial down the details to achieve batter frame rate and battery life.
Then what is the point of making genshin impact support 120fps?😂 Even at 60fps it still throttling, and also why don't they just put 80Hz instead of 120Hz?,or it's just to show that their phone support 120Hz and make it look better 😂😂. I know that some apps support 120Hz, but look at the other flagship android phone they still maintaining the 120Hz and still make the animation look smooth.Also that mean 5000mAh is better than the 4685mAh on ios if ios not limiting there system.
Thank you for that comparison, this is really interesting Though in my opinion if the iPhone began to lag in playing only 30 minutes, to me that deserves a deduction of a lot of points
Thanks for the test. As a OnePlus (12) user I'd say the thermals test is probably because of OnePlus' cooling system rather than the chipset, so if you exclude that fact - all 3 are pretty similar.
@@lukewatson489 the video is comparing chipsets not phones. The realistic thing to do IMO is to pick phones who don't skew the test results, pick tests that focus on the chipset itself rather than the optimization around it, or both.
@@igortroy The OP and Vivo focus on the balance between both of those and the there aren't many options for the A series chips, so I don't still get your issue with the test. OP isn't as performance inclined as people tend to believe. Vivo IQOO, Asus Rog, Xiaomi (in the past) and RM are the ones who mostly focus on performance mostly
I cannot wait for Turnip Drivers for the SD 8 Elite. I purchased the iQOO 13 and performance is insane! Regarding Adobe Rush - that shiz doesn't even use the GPU encoders on Android. Tbh Android is in dire need of pro-apps. 8 Elite has full linux support but lack of virtualization support on Android. We need some work around to utilize the performance of 8 Elite on tap.
For me mediatek is all about efficiency and available in flagship killers and flagship phones/devices. Ignoring iPhone PM since it costs as much as my phones and laptops with Android 12 skin 😂
@@sidjiiimenudo842and there are also alot of other type snapdragons with the same problem. Same goes for apple silicon. Every brand has their weaker silicon. But still, the 9400 is very efficient
Very true, I've been comparing them since last year, and I feel the mediatek is a better daily drive. Usually runs cooler and longer with more than sufficient performance
I see the mighty OnePlus 13 making quick work of the expensive fashion accessory! I am pleased! Also, hope to see Mediatek CPUs more often in phones, a real flagship killer!
just noting, sd elite (gen 1) dont have SVE & latest features from ARM because sd elite (gen 1) is using custom with older ARM v8 (called Oryon), while the others is using the latest/newest one (v9)...
6:30 multi core performance is a priority? Based on what? Real world usage snappiness is due to single core performance. I think it should be a combination of the two to decide the score. Try using a Dozen old Xeon cores in a computer... it's going to be really slow for everyday tasks
@@kashii359 multi core isn't important in everyday tasks cope harder. And let's not forget a18 pro has 2 performance and 4 efficient cores instead of 2 prime and 6 performance cores. That's why a18 pro is more efficient. Try again.
@@kashii359 And this numerous things are handling by a single core. If the phone were using all cores in everyday tasks, the phone would be as hot as in the benchmarks. But your fanboy brains don't know these basic cpu things. The only thing that phone needs to open multiple apps in the background is ram. Cope harder better stronger.
My 778g does 90 % things wild life was 2500 to 2600 cpu single 1022 and multi 2960 antutu 587 to 592k plays mosf games battery 4 to 5.5 hrs on 120hz 3 year old 4500 mah cell runs smooth plus samaung software support made this phone run on android 14 and one ui 6.1 amazing stuff camera still decent dual speakers headphone jack sd card slot fastest ufs 2.2 that can reach near ufs 3.1 speeds
Wild that a chip made for ONE singular phone with a specially made system and applications has the same score as a chip made for any type of android with apps made for almost any chip set
Basically at this point it doesn't really matter.. the chipset hardware is far ahead of most of the software and it's going to be like that for many years.
You should have used the wild life extreme stress test on these phones, not the regular wild life. Thats why iphone was limited. Also, there is a lot more tests on the 3dmark app like steel nomad light and solar bay for more intensive tasks.
No hate, I love android use android and will use android for life, but bionic 18 pro is fking efficient as helll, apple over charges everything product i know, but they are at the top of efficiency as of now, their laptops, mobile every chipset is awesome, [[[just the prices are not awesome 😵💫]]]
Its efficient because the os is full of cutted corners but of course you basic users don't care... yet u spend 1k+ € on these phones so u people are the reason these crap products still exist
They don’t overcharge. Compare prices and you’ll see equivalent Android phones, eg Samsung, cost the same. The difference is after sales support and RESALE VALUE. When you factor in resale value Apple is CHEAPER. This is a fact
Yep. That iPhone with a much smaller 4685 mAh showed similar battery percentage as the two androids at 6000mAh. Got to be impressed with the efficiency of the A18.
@@v.1triol it slaps nothing, 6gb ram iPhones like the 15 are now having reloads u can see it in nick ackermans tests , the 16 isn't even 2 years old and it actually was reloading even before 2024 u can go see it in multiple videos lol the longevity of 6gb and 8gb ram is really small. The flagship standard should be 12 and 16
8 Elite is more efficient than A18 Pro. For both GPU and CPU. Put Android on both A18 Pro and 8 Elite or put iOS on both A18 Pro and 8 Elite and then compare.
I don't know why the hell the iPhone still throttles when gaming at max graphics for more than an hour. The optimization is not very different from non-optimized flagships but at least the FPS with some others is consistent. As a heavy gamer, this is why I can only use my iPhone for the camera and not for gaming.
Apple needs to improve their cooling. They no longer have a lead in processor to carry them in performance. However, be careful with game benchmarks, specifically Genshin. There was an article about how benchmarks using this game to compare across OS are inaccurate because the game renders at a higher resolution on iOS. That was a couple years back so not sure if this is still the case
According to geerkerwan, the performance of that chipset is in between the 8+ gen 1 and the 8 gen 2, and suprisingly, it its better than the tensor g4, despite using SMT cores and a substancially older 7nm EUV node. That really shows why the vertical integration between software and hardware is so important, and what better example to that than Apple, which despite having a similiar chip in terms of raw efficiency, it could offer an overall lower power consumption thanks to the optimization and the extremely conservative governor, as noted in the test where the iPhone started to drop the performance.
Even though iphone chips are more efficient, since battery is lower size , it becomes more of an issue in long term when battery capacity goes down with charging cycles because the screen and other system (eg network, wifi ) power consumption becomes a larger percentage of the total system consumption
I bought a iPhone 15 pro for fun while I wait till I can replace my Galaxy A52s with a Galaxy S25+. So far I love the iPhone hardware, but hate the limited software. I skipped the S24+ because of the Exynoss processor.
I wanna get a new phone. I have 3 choices, Vivo x200 Pro, One Plus 13, Samsung 25 Ultra. Can I get some help as far as choice, I live in the US and Travel to Europe a lot
@Mistrz-mw4db The Samsung just doesn't seem like much of a upgrade from the S24U to S25U. So I'm choosing the Vivo X200 Pro. Its 16GB Ram and 512GB Memory with a case 90W charger, $1000 or less.
Detailed review! Correctly evaluates the power of Apple devices that are doing very well! Android is too Multiple layers of virtual machines! Google is blaming different manufacturers' hardware! Who do you think makes the iPhone screen? Bluetooth chip, wifi...
Detailed review! Correctly evaluates the power of Apple devices that are doing very well! Android is too Multiple layers of virtual machines! Google is blaming different manufacturers' hardware!
In my opinion, the A18 Pro is better, it's much faster than the two processors, and games currently run with single core not multi-core, there are no games currently needing multi-core. And the antutu is specially designed for android not for ios, that's why android phones get those huge scores in antutu. :)
@@Alexandru9558 no research needed. Most games use 2 to 4 cores usually and mostly evenly due to better efficiency and thermals. Single threaded only workload leads to higher Clock - higher Voltage - basically the least efficient way to perform a task - running hotter for no reason, whereas two cores need lower clock speeds - lower voltages - more efficient - less heat per core - and bonus -> it's significantly easier to dissapate heat from multiple points that aren't super hot as opposed to a singular point that is going full throttle. As stated, it's not 2014 anymore. The only thing that still holds true today is that the fastest core gets prioritized.
@@fystry The fastest core is the single core for performance, and what Apple does best with single core processor frequencies, for years they have been the leader, and will be for years to come.
Good test, but I disagree a little with the weighting of single- vs multi-core Geekbench result. I'd have given Iphone and QSD the same score here because there are still quite a lot of things that are limited by single core speed
In addition I think efficiency is probably one of the most important characteristics of a chip. If my numbers are correct, the Vivo x200 has a 25% larger battery than the iPhone and ends up at about the same relative consumption, which makes it massively less efficient!? Same for the Oneplus 13, I think.
Yes, there are very few applications outside of gaming that fully utilize all performance cores. That’s why Apple only provides four performance cores; this is more than sufficient for nearly every task. What application actually needs more than four performance cores? Since the single-core performance of the A18 Pro is better, it means that up to four cores running at a higher single-core performance will outperform the four cores on Snapdragon or Dimensity. The reality is that most apps people use only require one performance core to launch and then switch to efficiency cores for regular operations. Unlike a computer, where you might be multitasking and running 2-3 professional applications simultaneously, though even this scenario represents a niche case for a specific audience.
@@flowqi212massively bigger screen resolution at higher screen refresh frequencies and touch sample frequencies, in the end one plus ended with about 10% more battery and in the end, why does it matter? All I want from my phone is for it to last longer and I don't care how it does it, just like I don't care about libraries used when I get a better frame rate...
@jimkrom if someone tests chips and not phones, then it does matter if they are more or less efficient. After all, any manufacturer can combine chips with any battery size. If Apple suddenly decides to adapt to silicon-carbon anode tech then they'll simply have about 25% better battery life compared to the same phone with a different chip. I do agree though that other parameters like the display need to be identical as well, to get good data
Why run WL instead of WLE and SNL? It's common knowledge that the iPhone always limits the regular WL to 10k; so idk why you even did that test. It was completely pointless
thanks for your content, I don't know if it's the right place to say this but I just unsubscribed from a big TH-cam because honestly the sponsor money got all over their bias
If u want emulation, choose snap. If u want other things, outside emulation. Pick others. Big andriod games are mostly shooter and gatcha mmos rpgs games which will heat no matter what without coolers.🧐
Should've threw Tensor in there for laughs.
😄my thoughts as well
And Exynos lol
For the shits & googles 😂
Yeah, let's throw a phone that is definitely not made for performance into a benchmark test.
"uhhh let's give tensor half a point for participating"
nice test, but as an idea of improvement, you should definitely do a 5g data test, because that is one very important thing on a phone, especially nowadays.
Feel like the chip isn't the bottleneck most of the time for network
For me the 5G speed is not that interesting. As long as I can stream videos I am a happy man. The main advantage with 5G is the number of users .
But if you want to download e.g large games via mobile, then 5G speed matters.
That's the point of what actual though @@la7dfa
I rock an s24 ultra and an iphone 16 pro max for daily use and i can tell you that the iphone lacks in 5g performance. It's the worst of the bunch. Disappointing.
@@alexmayer8943 I've got a 24 ultra too and the range it has for wifi signals is also kinda crazy compared to the 1+ that i had before this
I think the Oppo Find X8 Pro would've been a better choice to represent the Dimensity 9400. The Vivo X200 Pro seems less focus on raw power and has most of its resources focused on the camera.
Vivo is an os with very optimized reputation, but china's Iqoo Neo 10 Pro flagship all around as subbrand of vivo is even more smoother because of origin os so this will be a better representator
@@11-descartesrasheedjermain53 The X200 Pro is literally scoring lower in synthetic benchmarks than the Find X8 Pro. I don't normally give them synthetic benchmarks that much credit, but considering it's 2 phones with the same chip, I think it's a fair comparison.
@@mistamaog benchmarks doesn't matter we need optimization and raw realworld performance
nope, the oppo find x8 pro heats up more than the vivo x200 pro.
Vivo i Better than Oppo Find X8 pro in terms of gaming
I'm currently using the iPhone 16 Pro Max and the Vivo X200 Pro right now and both are absolute units. You can't really go wrong with flagships these days to be honest. It's pretty much nitpicking at this point.
Is the Vivo video as good as the iphone ?
doesnt even make sense to have 2 flagships and use them to any sort of "stress" level
IF you have these, you're more likely to use 1 over the other what is it
@@FJaypewpewyeah, of course he's bragging. Even rich people wouldn't buy 2 flagship phones in such a close timeframe to use as their daily driver and secondary phone. Atleast, if he ia a smartphone reviewer, I might still believe him a little. He doesnt seems like that.
But, I agree with his statement. Right now, there is no wrong flagship. It's just that some users misinterpret their needs. For example, someone who needs multitasking buy an iPhone, or someone who wants a good camera buy an ROG phone
@@morm2173 It's close but the stabilization, color accuracy and lens transitions are still superior on the iPhone.
@arondyte318 I have the s23 ultra and it has good stabilization but some inconsistencies in video in noise and color in low light and certain conditions
The fact that this guy included dimensity in this comparison. You deserve my like and follow
Dimensity is a thoroughly powerful chip
The video rendering test was very good… Normally people use Adobe Rush for testing. And, they don't even explain that, there are some compatibility issues with Android. But you explain it very well…
Some apps are more optimize for iOS and some are for Android.
Not just compatibility, premiere pro doesn't even use the phone's gpu at all
Ios is limiting it to 60fps because it's just small software tricks to save battery, like what they do for example of slow scrolling basically delaying your swipe so it can look "smooth" and only giving you 80hz
80fps hoax has been debunk many times, and u clearly dint know what u are talking about, IOS doesnt have the ability to limiting game FPS in order to "save" battery life, rather than the game developer dint include 120fps mode on IOS. the other hand, lots of Chinese phone have this features call "MEMC" frame insertion or "game mode" that purposely dial down the details to achieve batter frame rate and battery life.
@rantao333 fun fact it has never been debunked
They limit it because of the thermals. They do it since their 15 series got hotter and they gave a software update to address the issue.
@@rantao333When, where, how? What universe are you from buddy?
Then what is the point of making genshin impact support 120fps?😂 Even at 60fps it still throttling, and also why don't they just put 80Hz instead of 120Hz?,or it's just to show that their phone support 120Hz and make it look better 😂😂. I know that some apps support 120Hz, but look at the other flagship android phone they still maintaining the 120Hz and still make the animation look smooth.Also that mean 5000mAh is better than the 4685mAh on ios if ios not limiting there system.
Premier pro doesn't seem to use the gpu at all on Android chipsets
and the media encoding engine
The gpu is much better on Androids but the app doesn't use it
This discrimination is sad.
You can Force it on Developer option
Disabled HW composite and Set the Premier pro from Default to use System Graphics
Thank you for that comparison, this is really interesting
Though in my opinion if the iPhone began to lag in playing only 30 minutes, to me that deserves a deduction of a lot of points
we the people really need an iQOO 13 Dimensity Version
vivo product x series dimensity and iqoo series snapdragon bro 😂
And Vivo's Ultra will go with Snapdragon. @@NamNguyen-eb8cz
Please make a mid-range chipset comparison video just like this one. Such as SD8S gen3, SD7+ gen3, 8300U, and tensile G4 with exynos maybe.
In the video export test, KineMaster should be used. The results would be very different.
How the hell does the Oneplus 13 get 9600 score in geekbench? I barely get 8800
Turn on performance mode
You are a good youtuber. You entirely made a new vid just because comments said that.
Sir please do a day in a life camera comparison between oneplus 13 and Vivo 200 Pro
Great tests and verdict! Good reasoning :)
Thanks for the test. As a OnePlus (12) user I'd say the thermals test is probably because of OnePlus' cooling system rather than the chipset, so if you exclude that fact - all 3 are pretty similar.
Ngl OnePlus 12 has the best cooling system out there.
@hitmarker6494 I bet the 13's is even better, which makes the thermals test less realistic than running the exact same chipset on a different phone.
@@igortroyVivo usually has very good cooling as well, so what's your point?
@@lukewatson489 the video is comparing chipsets not phones. The realistic thing to do IMO is to pick phones who don't skew the test results, pick tests that focus on the chipset itself rather than the optimization around it, or both.
@@igortroy The OP and Vivo focus on the balance between both of those and the there aren't many options for the A series chips, so I don't still get your issue with the test. OP isn't as performance inclined as people tend to believe. Vivo IQOO, Asus Rog, Xiaomi (in the past) and RM are the ones who mostly focus on performance mostly
I cannot wait for Turnip Drivers for the SD 8 Elite. I purchased the iQOO 13 and performance is insane!
Regarding Adobe Rush - that shiz doesn't even use the GPU encoders on Android. Tbh Android is in dire need of pro-apps.
8 Elite has full linux support but lack of virtualization support on Android. We need some work around to utilize the performance of 8 Elite on tap.
Turnip drivers? You mean emulator?
@@MikoMoko-o5d Yes. What does Android have apart from Grid Legends? Don't mention those random gacha games.
Gracias por incluir audio con doblaje al español! Buena comparativa, saludos desde chile
For me mediatek is all about efficiency and available in flagship killers and flagship phones/devices. Ignoring iPhone PM since it costs as much as my phones and laptops with Android 12 skin 😂
as an owner of D8300u it's not efficient at all
@Thorfinn0607 i was talking about d9400 specifically.
I have a phone with a dimensity 8300u and I can tell you, it gets hot and easily drains the battery
@sidjiiimenudo842 i meant dimensity 9400's performance efficiency rather than mediatek as a whole
@@sidjiiimenudo842and there are also alot of other type snapdragons with the same problem. Same goes for apple silicon. Every brand has their weaker silicon. But still, the 9400 is very efficient
Mediatek feels underrated
Very true, I've been comparing them since last year, and I feel the mediatek is a better daily drive. Usually runs cooler and longer with more than sufficient performance
Dimensity is King, Snapdragon fanboys haven't realised it yet but Mediatek has overtaken snapdragon
Cierto, siento que no le dan el valor que tiene
@@Hhhh22222-wyeah this thing have invidia GPU💀
@@Hhhh22222-w no it hasn't lil bro
It's a good day when Techmo uploads 🎉
I see the mighty OnePlus 13 making quick work of the expensive fashion accessory! I am pleased! Also, hope to see Mediatek CPUs more often in phones, a real flagship killer!
Is oneplus 13 cheap?
@@m.d.764 Yeah! The base model (256/12) should cost $899 as usual. It's better value than the other 2 in terms of price to perf
just noting, sd elite (gen 1) dont have SVE & latest features from ARM because sd elite (gen 1) is using custom with older ARM v8 (called Oryon), while the others is using the latest/newest one (v9)...
6:30 multi core performance is a priority? Based on what? Real world usage snappiness is due to single core performance. I think it should be a combination of the two to decide the score. Try using a Dozen old Xeon cores in a computer... it's going to be really slow for everyday tasks
There's like 50 apps running in phones in background
Wait till bro finds out that numerous things run in the background of a phone all the time , calm down apple sheep
@@kashii359 multi core isn't important in everyday tasks cope harder. And let's not forget a18 pro has 2 performance and 4 efficient cores instead of 2 prime and 6 performance cores. That's why a18 pro is more efficient. Try again.
@@kashii359 And this numerous things are handling by a single core. If the phone were using all cores in everyday tasks, the phone would be as hot as in the benchmarks. But your fanboy brains don't know these basic cpu things. The only thing that phone needs to open multiple apps in the background is ram. Cope harder better stronger.
@@Honamiichinose bro got so triggered that he wrote 2 whole paragraphs, try again I ain't reading allat
Indeed, a very informative video. Hardcore comparative facts without the fluff.👍
I've been waiting for someone to do this
Fantastic video. Thank you for the test and insight.
3:51 oneplus was 89%???
Good technical review mate, keep them coming 👍
Meanwhile Exynos 🤡
exynos is not out yet for sale
nah Tensor G4 is worse that piece of s*it cant even beat Kirin 9020 and SD 8 plus gen 1 comfortably..lol
Enynos is 💩
Tensor is the worst
Kirin is worst
My 778g does 90 % things wild life was 2500 to 2600 cpu single 1022 and multi 2960 antutu 587 to 592k plays mosf games battery 4 to 5.5 hrs on 120hz 3 year old 4500 mah cell runs smooth plus samaung software support made this phone run on android 14 and one ui 6.1 amazing stuff camera still decent dual speakers headphone jack sd card slot fastest ufs 2.2 that can reach near ufs 3.1 speeds
Wild that a chip made for ONE singular phone with a specially made system and applications has the same score as a chip made for any type of android with apps made for almost any chip set
Basically at this point it doesn't really matter.. the chipset hardware is far ahead of most of the software and it's going to be like that for many years.
Very good channel. Keep it up!
You should have used the wild life extreme stress test on these phones, not the regular wild life. Thats why iphone was limited. Also, there is a lot more tests on the 3dmark app like steel nomad light and solar bay for more intensive tasks.
great video man❤
Great comparison 👍
So basically is 9400 or 8 elite more efficient and better overall
8 elite. İ personally prefer Snapdragon over dimensity but its not that important imo cause both of them can do everything with ease.
@ardacankzc2349 i have s24U is it worth trading to s25 for better chip efficiency? I also prefer small phones than big boxy phones
Your content at this initial is top notch
No hate, I love android use android and will use android for life, but bionic 18 pro is fking efficient as helll, apple over charges everything product i know, but they are at the top of efficiency as of now, their laptops, mobile every chipset is awesome, [[[just the prices are not awesome 😵💫]]]
Its efficient because the os is full of cutted corners but of course you basic users don't care... yet u spend 1k+ € on these phones so u people are the reason these crap products still exist
They don’t overcharge. Compare prices and you’ll see equivalent Android phones, eg Samsung, cost the same.
The difference is after sales support and RESALE VALUE.
When you factor in resale value Apple is CHEAPER. This is a fact
Yep. That iPhone with a much smaller 4685 mAh showed similar battery percentage as the two androids at 6000mAh. Got to be impressed with the efficiency of the A18.
@@v.1triol it slaps nothing, 6gb ram iPhones like the 15 are now having reloads u can see it in nick ackermans tests , the 16 isn't even 2 years old and it actually was reloading even before 2024 u can go see it in multiple videos lol the longevity of 6gb and 8gb ram is really small. The flagship standard should be 12 and 16
8 Elite is more efficient than A18 Pro. For both GPU and CPU. Put Android on both A18 Pro and 8 Elite or put iOS on both A18 Pro and 8 Elite and then compare.
I don't know why the hell the iPhone still throttles when gaming at max graphics for more than an hour. The optimization is not very different from non-optimized flagships but at least the FPS with some others is consistent. As a heavy gamer, this is why I can only use my iPhone for the camera and not for gaming.
Guys how can I get the original audio? TH-cam is translating automatically the video and I can't find how to disable it
Click on setting -> Audio Track -> English
Great comparisons. I thought 8elite would get really hot but OnePlus 13 handled that pretty well .
I think the oneplus 13 is not running in high performance mode. You need to activate it in the battery settings to do it correctly
I made sure it is running in performance mode; you can also see the speed icon on top.
The Dimensity come out swinging 🥊
How the charger worked with s24 ultra while use.. It's not magnetic .. So it's difficult to keep it stable
With a magsafe case it's possible
Lightroom is optimized for apple, the test is incorrect
Love from India ❤
4:02 I already found this when I was looking for a wireless power bank that could charge fast and had a cooler
Fps? 1:19
Hello, Have you tested the OnePlus 13 vs Oppo Find x8 pro vs Iphone? Thank you.
Can't wait to see this test with the Galaxy s25 ultra
X200 pro mini vs iphone or s24? Battle of compact
I like that Vivo. This phone is amazing.
*Its a draw in cpu because iphone scores higher in single 8 lite in multi not a huge gap
*Gpu its 8 elite
*Efficiency its A18 pro
8 elite is not huge gap in single score compared to a18 too
And its has better performance
And run pc game(winlator) 60fps
SD 8 elite definiely gets a win on 3dmark. He didn't use the more intensive tests like steel nomad light, solar bay or wild life extreme.
kindly include the Highest Unisoc chipset. I'm kinda skeptical about buying phones using that kind of chipset
G Tensor : *_"i am a good chip right.. right?"_* 😢
M Dimensity : "ya, whatever you say or think." 😊
You should include the last test as the end of the day users will face the limitation when using the iPhone 16
Why is that the A18 Pro better for console games?
Apple needs to improve their cooling. They no longer have a lead in processor to carry them in performance. However, be careful with game benchmarks, specifically Genshin. There was an article about how benchmarks using this game to compare across OS are inaccurate because the game renders at a higher resolution on iOS. That was a couple years back so not sure if this is still the case
Good info 👍
What about kirin 9020 ?
Is Kirin still a thing?
According to geerkerwan, the performance of that chipset is in between the 8+ gen 1 and the 8 gen 2, and suprisingly, it its better than the tensor g4, despite using SMT cores and a substancially older 7nm EUV node.
That really shows why the vertical integration between software and hardware is so important, and what better example to that than Apple, which despite having a similiar chip in terms of raw efficiency, it could offer an overall lower power consumption thanks to the optimization and the extremely conservative governor, as noted in the test where the iPhone started to drop the performance.
Wait 3 more years and also put tensor g7 against these 3, it will probably lose anyway but still
what is speedometer 3.0 scores ??❤
How about the redmagic 10 pro? I heard it is the newest ultimate gaming phone and used the latest snapdragon chipset
Oneplus 13 is way better
Even though iphone chips are more efficient, since battery is lower size , it becomes more of an issue in long term when battery capacity goes down with charging cycles because the screen and other system (eg network, wifi ) power consumption becomes a larger percentage of the total system consumption
به به آقا محسن کار شما درسته ، فقط اگه تست تراتلینگ پردازنده هم بود عالی تر میشد ، ظاهرا توی اون تست هشت الیت ها رفتار جالبی ندارند 🤔
Bro can you comparison rog 10 pro plus iphone 16 pro max gaming test
Where are you from?
There is a mistake towards the end in title of the video.
Thanks. Fixed it.
Do it with honor magic 7 pro OnePlus not fully optimized
Please dont use geekbench
People making fun of Google but don't know they're using a TSMC chip next year for the Pixel 10 🤤
plz compare those phones with xiaomi 15 pro
--connectivity : 5G / WIFI / USB C ... 💥
--securite level : when phone locked/ unlocked 🔒/🔓
Honor magic 7 pro with same chipset performing significantly better than oneplus 13 in all parameters
I bought a iPhone 15 pro for fun while I wait till I can replace my Galaxy A52s with a Galaxy S25+. So far I love the iPhone hardware, but hate the limited software. I skipped the S24+ because of the Exynoss processor.
Can you buy me an s23ultra please? My current phone is so bad rn
Snapdragon back 🔛🔝 this time around. However, upcoming A19 Pro might be a beast too
Just remember that iphone 16 pro max can run some pc games on 60hz without any external host.
Higher MAH Silicone carbide paired with Apple's Bionic SOC will be soooo good!
Its gonna take an eternity for apple to use any above 4K mAh batteries
I wanna get a new phone. I have 3 choices, Vivo x200 Pro, One Plus 13, Samsung 25 Ultra. Can I get some help as far as choice, I live in the US and Travel to Europe a lot
if you don't care on budget, buy samsung
@Mistrz-mw4db The Samsung just doesn't seem like much of a upgrade from the S24U to S25U. So I'm choosing the Vivo X200 Pro. Its 16GB Ram and 512GB Memory with a case 90W charger, $1000 or less.
Detailed review! Correctly evaluates the power of Apple devices that are doing very well! Android is too Multiple layers of virtual machines! Google is blaming different manufacturers' hardware! Who do you think makes the iPhone screen? Bluetooth chip, wifi...
Detailed review! Correctly evaluates the power of Apple devices that are doing very well! Android is too Multiple layers of virtual machines! Google is blaming different manufacturers' hardware!
Do phone cooler work well with a case still?
The redmagic 10 pro might perform better due to better cooling and stuff on the snapdragon 8 elite
In my opinion, the A18 Pro is better, it's much faster than the two processors, and games currently run with single core not multi-core, there are no games currently needing multi-core. And the antutu is specially designed for android not for ios, that's why android phones get those huge scores in antutu. :)
yeah and the same goes for geekbench and ios, they are all great processors but you are being biased while trying to invalidate some bias
Games do not run single core since like a decade ago.
@@fystry I think you should do a little more research! =)))) You're too funny mate.
@@Alexandru9558 no research needed. Most games use 2 to 4 cores usually and mostly evenly due to better efficiency and thermals. Single threaded only workload leads to higher Clock - higher Voltage - basically the least efficient way to perform a task - running hotter for no reason, whereas two cores need lower clock speeds - lower voltages - more efficient - less heat per core - and bonus -> it's significantly easier to dissapate heat from multiple points that aren't super hot as opposed to a singular point that is going full throttle.
As stated, it's not 2014 anymore.
The only thing that still holds true today is that the fastest core gets prioritized.
@@fystry The fastest core is the single core for performance, and what Apple does best with single core processor frequencies, for years they have been the leader, and will be for years to come.
Good test, but I disagree a little with the weighting of single- vs multi-core Geekbench result. I'd have given Iphone and QSD the same score here because there are still quite a lot of things that are limited by single core speed
In addition I think efficiency is probably one of the most important characteristics of a chip. If my numbers are correct, the Vivo x200 has a 25% larger battery than the iPhone and ends up at about the same relative consumption, which makes it massively less efficient!? Same for the Oneplus 13, I think.
Yes, there are very few applications outside of gaming that fully utilize all performance cores. That’s why Apple only provides four performance cores; this is more than sufficient for nearly every task. What application actually needs more than four performance cores? Since the single-core performance of the A18 Pro is better, it means that up to four cores running at a higher single-core performance will outperform the four cores on Snapdragon or Dimensity. The reality is that most apps people use only require one performance core to launch and then switch to efficiency cores for regular operations. Unlike a computer, where you might be multitasking and running 2-3 professional applications simultaneously, though even this scenario represents a niche case for a specific audience.
@@flowqi212massively bigger screen resolution at higher screen refresh frequencies and touch sample frequencies, in the end one plus ended with about 10% more battery and in the end, why does it matter? All I want from my phone is for it to last longer and I don't care how it does it, just like I don't care about libraries used when I get a better frame rate...
Agreed
@jimkrom if someone tests chips and not phones, then it does matter if they are more or less efficient. After all, any manufacturer can combine chips with any battery size. If Apple suddenly decides to adapt to silicon-carbon anode tech then they'll simply have about 25% better battery life compared to the same phone with a different chip.
I do agree though that other parameters like the display need to be identical as well, to get good data
I heard that graphics in Genshin Impact look a little bit better on iOS than on Android- idk know tho. (correct me if I´m wrong)
Why run WL instead of WLE and SNL? It's common knowledge that the iPhone always limits the regular WL to 10k; so idk why you even did that test. It was completely pointless
Next Videos Mr Techmo 🙏🙂👍
✅Honor Magic 7 RSR Porsche Design VS Huawei Mate 70 RS Ultimate Design 🤤😁
✅Honor 300 Ultra VS Huawei Nova 13 Pro 🤤😁
Do a video on best modem please.
Nah nah wtf why a18 and vivio same game score ? Only performance matters , 2c is not a big deference .
why doesn't ALL the chinese phone us Huawei Kirin chip??
Need to use 5 different video render apks to get better average performance 2 adobe apks favors ios
Choose Iqoo 13 it's the best 8 Elite Device is doesn't heats up like other 8 Elite phones
He should've used the Asus to represent Snapdragon and use it WITHOUT the cooling fan
thanks for your content, I don't know if it's the right place to say this but I just unsubscribed from a big TH-cam because honestly the sponsor money got all over their bias
If u want emulation, choose snap.
If u want other things, outside emulation.
Pick others.
Big andriod games are mostly shooter and gatcha mmos rpgs games which will heat no matter what without coolers.🧐
Dimensity 9400 have invidia GPU and it has the best ray tracing 💀
We Might Need Dimensity 9500 And 9500+ For New Vivo Phones