The funny thing is that the made some of the lost boys into girls for feminism. But in the original story there weren’t any lost girls because girls were too smart to get lost. So essentially the original story was more feminist.
@@simpdefendmlady6579 Exactly! this view of girls as being inherently smart was never based on any data. '2016 SAT Test Results Confirm Pattern That’s Persisted for 50 Years - High School Boys Are Better at Math Than Girls'
@simp defend m'lady I'm old enough to remember UK's education reform when they removed soft science subjects and then had to deal with a new problem: 'A-level results 2017 Boys overtake girls in top grades for first time in years'
Only if they're an evil capitalist white businessman, I suspect. Come to think of it, though... I didn't see the Beauty and the Beast remake, but they didn't bother to redeem Gaston, did they? I don't think so. (Not they should have. Gaston was a bastard. It's just interesting to note.)
It's easier to destroy classic heroes and replace them with villainous ones, that are usually self inserts instead. In reality the writers/directors are probably more like real life Peter and Wendy's, making them the true villains, and villains don't actually think they are the bad guys.
It annoyed me as a kid (I’m a boy) when I heard girl characters say that, and it was never bc I wasn’t a girl. It was bc it was just annoying. When the male characters did it I still got annoyed. It’s just a character being prideful and arrogant, which has never been a likeable trait. Especially not for me personally
I grew up with the 2003 film, and I remember how much the colour and wonder reeled us in, and how I nearly broke my leg trying to fly when I was 7..... what I'm saying is that children and adults alike, deserve wonder.
@@RobinMcBeth this was a question I had to ask my mum, because yes- I was a weird seven year old. The answer btw is neon orange (mum says that's what was always on the walls).
It's really stupid but the reason Tinkerbell doesn't glow in the movie is because the director said it "doesn't make sense" and "isn't realistic". When I read what he said it made me burst out laughing because of how absolutely nonsensical it is.
@@g-man9988 obviously reaper is correct in his assumption that it was to avoid "whitening up" the black actress. But the director had to make up an excuse because obviously he couldn't admit the real ridiculous reason which would add to the argument that making tinkerbell black was a mistake and unnecessary
@@chocolatitomaravilla3899 maybe you're right but then again I think it might be a mix of both because we all know the people at disney aren't exactly the smartest and I wouldn't put it past him to legitimately think he had to state a glowing fairy was unrealistic honestly I've seen way worse in stupidity especially from disney.
you know you saying this just occurred to me that this is 100% true Disney doesn't care if it does good it cares if it gets diversity points for being inclusive.
@@Charlotte226 yeah you right. Apparently it gives diversity points, but if you stop to think about it, it's actually rude and not polite to tell words to people who doesnt know its meaning. On the other hand, i remember a time i was living sorrounded with people who didnt understand my native language, and inevitablily, sometimes some words slide by mistake (or intentional). Its the brain wiring and stuff
Actually, in the book, Pan did cut off Hook's hand and fed it to the croc. It was always a story that Pan thought was a good laugh. It's why the croc hunted Hook, and why Hook was obsessed with killing Pan
And in the book all the lost boys were kids because Peter Pan straight up murdered them when they got too old. - The point stands, Peter Pan is a sociopathic violent little shit :D
Yep, the disney original made the character more palatable and sympathetic, but the original was kind of a sociopath. I never finished the book because I hated Peter so much
Captain Hook : Did Pan show good form when he did *this* to me? Mr. Smee : Why, Captain, cutting your hand off was only a childish prank, you might say. Captain Hook : Aye, but throwing it to that crocodile! That cursed beast liked the taste of me so well he's followed me ever since, licking his chops for the rest of me.
@Jon Jandres no one could play a better Hook than Hoffman. Robin Williams to me almost ruined the move. The scene where Hook threatens to commit suicide is the best.
The fact that we aren't sure if they're joking or not is a sign they could _possibly_ do this in our assessment of these directors, and that worries me... doesn't surprise me, given it's Hollywood, but it worries me as consumers lol. No wonder I don't trust new movies, anymore.
This new movie was soulless. It’s ironic. They make a big deal about casting a black woman as Tinkerbell, but remove all the qualities of the character that people love. She’s so irrelevant to this story now. She’s just there. Her death and resurrection means something in the other interpretations. Her jealousy of Wendy matters. Her relationship with Peter matters. She has depth. All of that is gone. They could have showcased Tiger Lily’s tribe and their culture since the 1953 movie had such a controversial depiction of Native Americans, but they don’t. She’s just there. They have a lost boy with Down Syndrome, but give him two lines and mostly just keep him in the background. There are girls in the lost boys now. Why? Because there are. Why are they called the lost boys then? Who knows. There’s no reason for it. They’re parading these changes like they’re being “diverse and inclusive” when it’s the exact opposite. They’re using the way these people look, and that’s it. They aren’t characters. Wendy even says “oh you’re ___” when a new character appears so the audience has a clue who tf they are. Beyond lazy. This movie is so far and away from what the Peter Pan story is. They remove Wendy’s maternal role and flirtationship with Peter in the story and make her an “independent girl boss” removing her purpose in the story completely. Her happy thoughts are her living her life alone. Gimme a break. The movie almost feels like it’s pushing an “anti mother” message. An “anti childhood” message. They sucked all the magic, the heart, the SOUL from this story. Neverland is dull and desolate. It doesn’t look like the place of a child’s imagination. Peter Pan has 0 charisma, 0 charm. Captain Hook is all of a sudden a sympathetic character? Just have him be a bad guy!!! That was such a half baked backstory and the execution was embarrassing. No plot point or character has any nuance. This whole movie is a nothing-burger. It’s soulless corporate garbage.
Hook is clearly a villain in the book and the 1953 version. Making him an ex lost boy destroys part of the rivalry and tension between him and Pan. The backstory is on the ao3 fanfiction level.
Tinkerbell being jealous of Wendy over a boy doesn't jive with this modern feminist version of the story, so they made them friends in this instead because women are perfect in every way. SMH
@@chrisb.1214 Yup. Funny how Tinkerbell is a four inch non human female in a kid's story. And they're still scared of her. Black her up, that will fix the problem. (No I fancy fit black girls too)
Cruella and Maleficent should have stayed evil but I don't mind making Hook a sympathetic character since he was treated unfairly by Peter. Peter could take the role of a villain but it wasn't done logically in this remake. Oh well, at least Scar is still a villain in the remake
The beauty of Wendy is that she's the one who made everyone reakize that growing up is not that bad. She's suppose to be mature and caring enough to be seen as a mother figure of the lost BOYS. I'm so done with 'strong' 'angsty' and 'rebellious' female characters....this is why I mostly stay away with western shows where the female character is the main lead....I realize that Asian shows now has more personality diversity and relationships that makes sense....
@CJ-ov1pl I guess you selective read and possibly even selectively understood what I said. If you think all strong women are angsty, rebellious and such then I guess it's up to you to decide to believe that. I suggest you read what I wrote before insinuating that I mean women in general, when I'm only pertaining to the common female protagonists that are portrayed in WESTERN media.
Does Disney hate children now? They've ruined everyone's favourite fairytale stories countless times and now they've devastated the child actors in this film as they read all the negative reviews about this abominaton of a film. Disney magic seems to have become Disney malignity.
In the original story, Peter Pan had a horrible memory, too. He forgot all kinds of things and people and events and where he was or what he was doing. Basically, he was Joe Biden with a sword.
Controversial opinion: The indian scene in the orignal cartoon wasnt offensive. Was it stereotypical? Sure. But so was its portrayal of pirates...mermaids...boys..etc. the indians were sharing their culture with the boys who are excited to join in their culture and customs.. nothing but respect and reverance by the young boys to the tribe. Even after the tribe took them prisoner initially because they didn't trust them.
To be honest I don't find that scene offensive at all, The Natives were nice and they portrayed them accurately. And Peter and Wendy were not being racist to them.
this, the only real change it needed was more accuracy in language and customs but that's too much work for modern disney, just scrub them from the movie except strong female indian girl so they can double up the "strong female representation"
The thing that make 0 sense to me is having lost girls. Like the whole point of the lost boys was that they had never seen a girl so windy acted like a mother figure to them. It defeats the whole purpose of the lost boys to begin with!
I just read that Peter and Wndy was originally supposed to be released in theaters in 2021, but then the pandemic came and the film was shelved. But over the past two years, it underwent changes, new scripts, reshoots and cuts to fit the Disney+ format and be released on streaming instead. For this reason, it would be interesting to see and know what the 2021 version would have been like if it had been realized.
This depiction of Nederland looks like a normal ass island. No mythical creatures, no mermaids, no cool Jungles or fantastical forests, no tree houses or cool fortresses. How do you have a magic island with no freakin' magical stuff?
I love the part where the lost persons ask Wendy to read them a bedtime story and she replies saying “not only will I read the story but I’ll make the bloody movie for you because that’s how fucking amazing I am “
@@elizabethscott7904 out of context is not wrong, but is the constant abuse of this ideas on recent disney films that makes them feel forced. Is just feels like Disney trying to hard
@@elizabethscott7904 Back then it was rarer & I remember that the Peter Pan movie was taking place during the War. Also have in mind that before modern technology people had more children mostly because of the lack of effective contraceptives & society wasn't that promiscuous back then. Originally Wendy was mature & motherly not an angry feminist with a modern mindset.
My favorite part of the movie is when Wendy looked around and realized the destruction and death she was responsible for and put down her gauntlets, and adopted two young girls whose parents had died recently.
I suppose they had to change Hook from a bad guy to a good guy because it would be ableism to present someone with a hook hand as being evil. They would be accused of hating the disabled.
In all the other versions Peter was actually the one who cut off Hook's hand and fed it to the crocodile. He has always been somewhat immoral and sociopathic. The problem here is that this version of the character lacks any kind of charm and charisma, so his asshole nature stands out more.
Exactly! And in the other versions hook was much more of a dick so you honestly weren’t that horrified by it. I mean the dude was constantly trying to murder children.
I do kind of feel bad for Hook at times as he's always being tormented by that crocodile (because of Peter Pan) but he's not supposed to be good in any way, he's still a manipulative murderer who tries to kill children and has even killed his own men for no real reason
@Leah-Marie because kids were cooperating with Peter so he saw them as enemies as well. Maybe kids should have questioned the reality instead of assuming that someone is a bad guy who should be bullied just because Peter does it and makes it seem ok. And I remember, he did offer them to become pirates but they refused and said that they will support Peter till the end. The actions of Peter made him slightly crazy, sure, but kids were also bullying him for no reason
@@LucasBR702 maybe not with Cruella or Maleficent but it could work with Hook if the writers had put more effort into it instead of lumping so much of different things into one pile of bs (there has to be a clear focus on something specific but the writers wanted to do everything all at once).
@@LucasBR702 Yep, to make it as grim as possible. It would have been cool to see a thriller/horror drama about Peter pan from a different psychological angle
One of the saddest features of our times is that you can no longer be sarcastic with people who don’t know you, as no matter how ridiculous your comment is, it won’t even be the most absurd thing uttered in the preceding 5 minutes!
There was already a great live action Peter Pan movie from 2003. I remember renting that from Blockbuster and watching it with my family. Also, the Tinker Bell movies are fun as well.
@@Swiftbow Mr. Isaacs was also Mr. Darling in this one ! :0 And it's bloody interesting The 2023 movie is basically an attempt to remake and / or copy the 2003 masterpiece, resulting in a garbage.
@@jefuru5788 Well, the 2003 movie isn't Disney. That's partly why it followed the book a LOT more closely. The biggest change was in the climax with Peter and Wendy... which I thought was really effective and something the book hinted at, but never fully embraced. The original Disney cartoon followed the book for the most part, too... at least on the major plot beats. They simplified and glossed over a lot of the grittier stuff. I do love both versions. (Not this new travesty.) The old cartoon is the most fun version... the 2003 is fun, too, but also leans more into the themes of why growing up (while not forgetting the value of youth) is a good thing.
Looking at these clips, all I can think is "Why is everything so goddamn dark?!" Half the scenes are borderline imperceptible with how dark the color grading is! This is supposed to be a KID'S MOVIE! Where's the color?! Where's the shine?!
I also just watched the Critical Drinker's review on this movie. It's nearly identical to this one to the point i'm certain he watched this one before making his own. I legit had a deja-vu.
I laughed my arse off through the whole review. Thank you Reaper, for giving such a brutally honest and amusing review of this total piece of dog ****.
In this movie, we get Peter Pan after a few bottles of Bud Light. Wendy "yaaaas Queen!" , and Tinkerbell "I'm just here to rob the place" . Well played Reaper, jolly well played!
Again, like their live version of Pinocchio, or other films like The Woman King, or stories about social stratification in Victorian England depicting all black people as wealthy nobles, the wokeness managed to completely undermine the story's messages. In the book, the Lost Boys are described as having no girls beccause girls aren't stupid enough to fall out of their baby carriages. Wendy plays a maternal role to them, and it is her mature maternal instincts that inspires growth in the boys. But they instead choose to throw out all motivation and growth and learning because everyone starts out as ideal (which, by woke standards, means rude, selfish, and rejecting love as weakness) cookie-cutter figures with level playing fields instead of facing adversity and difference, and even finding value in differences. That's why the woke movement is undermining black rights, women's rights, gay rights, etc. It is a self-destructive movement of ignorant fucks whose sole value is being different for the sake of being different, and yet vilifying and denying difference simultaneously.
I personally think Hook was the best representation of Peter Pan since the original with some new additions. To this day, it’s still one of my favorite films because it runs the gamut of emotions and is a joy to watch.
I had to cleanse my eyes by watching the Peter Pan 2003 adaptation. It's arguably the best direct live-action adaptation of Peter Pan. No identity politics, no feminism.
I just rewatched the 2003 version. It was beautiful, funny, magical, good characters, everything this movie is not. When Peter got wounded by Hook at the Black Castle, for the rest of the movie you can see that scar. The fairies were beautiful and GLOWED, music was fantastic, there was character growth. One shot from that movie had more color than this entire movie combined
What i really hate the most is how they decided to make the female characters not nice, kind, and compassion cause it's considered "weak" to the writers and it's frustrated.
To them, women who are dicks are strong badasses who can do anything and women who are kind and compassionate are weaklings who'll get nowhere in life. As a strong woman who is also very kind and sweet, this trope makes me wanna bash my head against a wall. I'm not one to say "I'm offended", because that phrase has practically no meaning anymore. But honestly, with how much Disney has been pushing that trope...I feel insulted.
Remember when it was the villains who mocked these qualities and not the heroes? Fauna: "Maleficent doesn't know anything about love, or kindness, or the joy of helping others. You know, sometimes I don't think she's really very happy." Gaston: What's the matter, beast? Too "kind and gentle" to fight back? Frollo: You idiot! That wasn't kindness! That was cunning! Gypsies are not capable of real love!
That comment about the original having a certain charm is spot on. What holds up the best is the effects they have on tinkerbell. Those fairy dust looks so damn good and must have taken alot of drawing work
"Peter Pansexual" you got a good chuckle out of me with that one haha, this is one of my new favorite channels, the voice and straightforward way you talk and insult everything is very funny to me
OG Wendy would never act like that to her brothers. She would die for those boys, she is the kindest and most responsible and caring older sister I've ever seen in a book/movie. What they did to her in that trainwreck of a movie sickens me. She was genuinely the sweetest kid ever, and there is were her strength lies. But no, they had to turn her in to a little bitch (no shame on the actress tho, I know she is a child and that horrible script was not her fault)
Peter threw Hook's hand to the crocodile in the original story too, but in that version he had admirable traits like giving Hook a leg up in a duel on marooner's rock only for the captain to fight dirty and rake Peter's arm or to allow Wendy to fly away on John's kite as he stayed behind to drown.
@@ShaDO118k Hook even says he prefers the hook to his hand as it gives him an advantage to killing, he just hates that the croc has a taste for him now.
@@nont18411 Sometime before the story, Captain Hook and his crew of pirates invade Neverland. Peter Pan, known as the protector of Neverland, intervenes, and a mutual duel commences with Hook. Peter gets the upper hand, literally, and feeds it to the ancient crocodile that was nearby. I suppose Peter did so to teach the pirate a lesson.
@@nont18411 There's also a symbolic meaning. Peter Pan incarnates childhood while Hook represents adulthood and all the serious things that go with it... including death, whom the crocodile with a ticking clock is an allegory for.
Btw peter pan was originally meant to be seen as the villain in Disney but the animated version made him seem like the good guy for children but if you seen dark theory videos you would understand why he seems like a damn like psycho path lol
The problem here is that the writers don’t actually intend Peter to be the villain. They think he’s the hero (after the women Ofcourse) here that only made a tiny mistake. . If they stuck to the original story without having some out-clause of “let’s relate to the villain because he’s actually not bad” then I think it still would have been a good movie. Not this.
@@amyqb117 Ik the problem was that Disney is trying their hardest to not seem so sexiest or racist to our generation and to our new city of people getting offended so easily. I just thought I point out how he is technically a villain, but the movies have ruined their original plan to make him be seen as the great hero and loveable character which they failed to do in this movie and it's just so fucking boring to watch legit after the first 20mins I turned it off lmao.
There's a channel, and of course I can't remember the name of it, but the channel has videos titled "The disturbing origins of" And Peter Pan really is pretty fucked up 🤣🤣🤣 This movie however is completely neutering this character. I don't get why they had to make Wendy such a bitch, and Peter such a pussy when Wendy was fascinated with the stories, and Peter was a daredevil. What makes them think this is going to work???
Yeah, the original idea was that Peter is a sinister boy that likes sadism but the animated Disney cartoon added more comedy and slightly altered the original grim story (because they wanted to make the story less dark for kids, like they did with the Hunchback of Notre Dame animated film by excluding the tragic ending of all three main characters). The problem with the remake is that it was poorly planned and done, the acting was unimpressive and the dirty swamp filter ruined the movie experience, as well as made scenes look empty and dull. There are many different ways on how to make a refreshing new story but unfortunately, the director is prioritizing agenda before a good story
Anyone else waiting for the drinker’s inevitable video? Edit: I realise it was a bit cheeky to post about another TH-camr in the comments. However having now watched the video I have to say it was hilarious. Well done sir.
Fuck no; I'm just here to laugh at adults bitching about kids' shows they're not forced to watch.. Something Something the message and drunk sex with Russian hooker... Seriously don't know what's worse: Woke trash shows... Or the TH-camrs that build their fame upon them
Peter pan cutting off Hooks hand and feeding it to the crocodile is accurate. Its the reason why the croc keeps stalking Hook, he just tasted too good 🥰
"Their brother John who looks like Harry Potter" 😂. The funniest part is I've done fanvideos for the 2003 Peter Pan where I used Harry Potter for clips of "older John Darling" so this is spot on.
No plan to watch the movie, your review was hilarious and I enjoyed the interspersed memes. I hope they keep churning out these mediocre moves for more of this content.
Gotta say, the biggest surprise here is the sympathetic Hook, I thought this card was for villain ladies only. Cant wait to know why Frollo was right about burning up Paris now lmao
In the original story, Peter Pan was a cautionary tale about the dangers of wanting to stay childish and irresponsible instead of “growing up” and becoming a functioning adult
3:37 I think I heard the actual reason is even more stupid: the glowing would be unrealistic. Yeah, the literal fairy is fine, but a glowing fairy is just too much.
@@justhereforthetragedy I’m pretty sure Reaper beat Drinker by a day. Which, I mean, I understand they both must have been working on it for a while, so maybe it’s just congruent thinking.
![[Live] : ONE 169 วันนี้!! "อนาโตลี vs อูมาร์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IK3YZVWuFJg/mqdefault.jpg)
Comments are Fixed now
I watch peter pan 2003 is better than disney shit live action of hore shit
Disney is crap! Watch anime instead!
Peter Pansexual 😄
Not to douse the party, but is this narration text-to-speech?
I expected another train wreck. Glad I'm not disappointed.
The funny thing is that the made some of the lost boys into girls for feminism.
But in the original story there weren’t any lost girls because girls were too smart to get lost.
So essentially the original story was more feminist.
So girls are equally as dumb as men that they too can get lost and think that they are boys. Yeah, equality!
😂😂😂
Exactly, the old film was more misandrist than the new one
@@simpdefendmlady6579 Exactly! this view of girls as being inherently smart was never based on any data. '2016 SAT Test Results Confirm Pattern That’s Persisted for 50 Years - High School Boys Are Better at Math Than Girls'
@simp defend m'lady I'm old enough to remember UK's education reform when they removed soft science subjects and then had to deal with a new problem: 'A-level results 2017 Boys overtake girls in top grades for first time in years'
Will Disney ever actually give us an actual VILLAIN who is evil for the sake of being evil and not a sympathetic misunderstood character??
Only if they're an evil capitalist white businessman, I suspect.
Come to think of it, though... I didn't see the Beauty and the Beast remake, but they didn't bother to redeem Gaston, did they? I don't think so. (Not they should have. Gaston was a bastard. It's just interesting to note.)
No. Because they are evil and this is a form of self-soothing for them
It's easier to destroy classic heroes and replace them with villainous ones, that are usually self inserts instead.
In reality the writers/directors are probably more like real life Peter and Wendy's, making them the true villains, and villains don't actually think they are the bad guys.
The villains are 'misunderstood' because the writers think it gives the character amazing depths (hint: it doesn't)
@@ultrademigod Very astute!
As a woman every time I hear a Female character make a "Women are cool" type of line I roll my eyes
Yea, if women were so much better than men it would've been self evident
I can't imagine this level of pandering could ever make anyone feel good. Id imagine it just seems insulting.
It annoyed me as a kid (I’m a boy) when I heard girl characters say that, and it was never bc I wasn’t a girl. It was bc it was just annoying. When the male characters did it I still got annoyed. It’s just a character being prideful and arrogant, which has never been a likeable trait. Especially not for me personally
This's as pathetic as the fake native american d*ke at the acadamy.
As another woman I second and third this. I can’t stand it.
I grew up with the 2003 film, and I remember how much the colour and wonder reeled us in, and how I nearly broke my leg trying to fly when I was 7..... what I'm saying is that children and adults alike, deserve wonder.
I just bought that movie... I remember it being really good. The old cartoon was amazing, too.
This remake makes the 2003 version look like a frickin masterpiece
That 2003 version was the only best live action ever
You thought you could fly at the age of... SEVEN?! I have to know, what's your favourite flavour of CRAYON?!
@@RobinMcBeth this was a question I had to ask my mum, because yes- I was a weird seven year old. The answer btw is neon orange (mum says that's what was always on the walls).
It's really stupid but the reason Tinkerbell doesn't glow in the movie is because the director said it "doesn't make sense" and "isn't realistic". When I read what he said it made me burst out laughing because of how absolutely nonsensical it is.
He even asked where the light comes from. And I'm yelling at the screen that it comes from HER. She's a fucking fairy.
@@mattjones7226 Exactly couldn't have said it better myself it really does just baffle me how these people function.
@@g-man9988 obviously reaper is correct in his assumption that it was to avoid "whitening up" the black actress. But the director had to make up an excuse because obviously he couldn't admit the real ridiculous reason which would add to the argument that making tinkerbell black was a mistake and unnecessary
@@chocolatitomaravilla3899 maybe you're right but then again I think it might be a mix of both because we all know the people at disney aren't exactly the smartest and I wouldn't put it past him to legitimately think he had to state a glowing fairy was unrealistic honestly I've seen way worse in stupidity especially from disney.
@@mattjones7226 lmao It's that simple 🤣
“Because she has to keep reminding everybody that she is a native.” 💀💀This is priceless
you know you saying this just occurred to me that this is 100% true Disney doesn't care if it does good it cares if it gets diversity points for being inclusive.
@@Charlotte226 yeah you right. Apparently it gives diversity points, but if you stop to think about it, it's actually rude and not polite to tell words to people who doesnt know its meaning.
On the other hand, i remember a time i was living sorrounded with people who didnt understand my native language, and inevitablily, sometimes some words slide by mistake (or intentional). Its the brain wiring and stuff
@@Charlotte226 only when comes to europeans but everyone else they can stay homogenous
Actually, in the book, Pan did cut off Hook's hand and fed it to the croc. It was always a story that Pan thought was a good laugh. It's why the croc hunted Hook, and why Hook was obsessed with killing Pan
That's what I remembered especially from the movie Hook
And in the book all the lost boys were kids because Peter Pan straight up murdered them when they got too old. - The point stands, Peter Pan is a sociopathic violent little shit :D
Yep, the disney original made the character more palatable and sympathetic, but the original was kind of a sociopath. I never finished the book because I hated Peter so much
Captain Hook : Did Pan show good form when he did *this* to me?
Mr. Smee : Why, Captain, cutting your hand off was only a childish prank, you might say.
Captain Hook : Aye, but throwing it to that crocodile! That cursed beast liked the taste of me so well he's followed me ever since, licking his chops for the rest of me.
@Jon Jandres no one could play a better Hook than Hoffman. Robin Williams to me almost ruined the move. The scene where Hook threatens to commit suicide is the best.
I love these reviews.
Disney is so terrible these days.
They need to fire these woke women.
The part where Wendy disams a nuclear warhead and opens a vegan cafe shop on the back of Hooks ship was so uplifting.
Stunning and brave!
Please tell me you're joking.
The fact that we aren't sure if they're joking or not is a sign they could _possibly_ do this in our assessment of these directors, and that worries me... doesn't surprise me, given it's Hollywood, but it worries me as consumers lol.
No wonder I don't trust new movies, anymore.
fuck off with these damn jokes already. Bot behavior by far.
Best part by far
“Peter pansexual”
I’m calling my sister that for now on.
why sister?
@@solidvault3698 Maybe he has a sister.
That joke was funnier than anything I've seen on Disney in a while.
To be fair, Peter Pan cutting off Hook's hand and feeding it to an alligator is the most accurate this whole movie is to the source material.
Yeah agree
Yes
True (except "alligator", it was a croc)
@@Andoroid Oh damn that's right, I must have been thinking of Happy Gilmore 😂
Except that he did it because Hook was formidable.
This new movie was soulless. It’s ironic. They make a big deal about casting a black woman as Tinkerbell, but remove all the qualities of the character that people love. She’s so irrelevant to this story now. She’s just there. Her death and resurrection means something in the other interpretations. Her jealousy of Wendy matters. Her relationship with Peter matters. She has depth. All of that is gone. They could have showcased Tiger Lily’s tribe and their culture since the 1953 movie had such a controversial depiction of Native Americans, but they don’t. She’s just there. They have a lost boy with Down Syndrome, but give him two lines and mostly just keep him in the background. There are girls in the lost boys now. Why? Because there are. Why are they called the lost boys then? Who knows. There’s no reason for it.
They’re parading these changes like they’re being “diverse and inclusive” when it’s the exact opposite. They’re using the way these people look, and that’s it. They aren’t characters. Wendy even says “oh you’re ___” when a new character appears so the audience has a clue who tf they are. Beyond lazy.
This movie is so far and away from what the Peter Pan story is. They remove Wendy’s maternal role and flirtationship with Peter in the story and make her an “independent girl boss” removing her purpose in the story completely. Her happy thoughts are her living her life alone. Gimme a break. The movie almost feels like it’s pushing an “anti mother” message. An “anti childhood” message. They sucked all the magic, the heart, the SOUL from this story. Neverland is dull and desolate. It doesn’t look like the place of a child’s imagination. Peter Pan has 0 charisma, 0 charm. Captain Hook is all of a sudden a sympathetic character? Just have him be a bad guy!!! That was such a half baked backstory and the execution was embarrassing. No plot point or character has any nuance. This whole movie is a nothing-burger. It’s soulless corporate garbage.
I agree with everything you say! Can't believe people are really writting crap like this, it's crazy
Hook is clearly a villain in the book and the 1953 version. Making him an ex lost boy destroys part of the rivalry and tension between him and Pan. The backstory is on the ao3 fanfiction level.
@@williet.3058 hahahaha love this comment 🤣
This movie is pushing a lesbianism message and a hatred of the traditional moral life and family
That’s what happened when bean counters figure they can cut out the middle man/femme and decide that they can write the movies themselves.
The funniest thing is Tinkerbell and Wendy being friends when in reality......🗡🗡🩸🩸
It’s like saying France and England have always been close friends.
@@Merlodicathey only became friends after another bigger baddie came along germoney
@@bornstar481 To call them friends was a bit of a stretch.
Tinkerbell being jealous of Wendy over a boy doesn't jive with this modern feminist version of the story, so they made them friends in this instead because women are perfect in every way. SMH
@@chrisb.1214 Yup. Funny how Tinkerbell is a four inch non human female in a kid's story. And they're still scared of her. Black her up, that will fix the problem.
(No I fancy fit black girls too)
OMG! The part where Captain Hook agrees to lower his carbon emissions by installing solar panels on his ship made me tear up 😢
Sympathetic villains all over again. Why can’t we have villains who are just evil?
Cruella and Maleficent should have stayed evil but I don't mind making Hook a sympathetic character since he was treated unfairly by Peter. Peter could take the role of a villain but it wasn't done logically in this remake. Oh well, at least Scar is still a villain in the remake
Why can’t we just have well written villains in general?
It's why DreamWorks is king rn
Puss in boots the last wish anyone
We will never get another Frollo.
Peter Pan (2003) is still the superior adaptation. Good looking cast, great vfx, and the god-level soundtracks
“Black tinker bell shows up to rob the place but is captured by Harry Potter” BRO WTF 😭😭😂😂😂😂
That was my favorite line in the video!
Yah... black tinker bell though it was walmart
You mean nikkerbell?
@@adil0028 not you being fucking racist. reporting
@@adil0028, best joke so far. You get a like of approval from me.
The beauty of Wendy is that she's the one who made everyone reakize that growing up is not that bad. She's suppose to be mature and caring enough to be seen as a mother figure of the lost BOYS. I'm so done with 'strong' 'angsty' and 'rebellious' female characters....this is why I mostly stay away with western shows where the female character is the main lead....I realize that Asian shows now has more personality diversity and relationships that makes sense....
I hate that you are right
Couldn't like this comment more! Agree wholeheartedly
@CJ-ov1pl I guess you selective read and possibly even selectively understood what I said. If you think all strong women are angsty, rebellious and such then I guess it's up to you to decide to believe that. I suggest you read what I wrote before insinuating that I mean women in general, when I'm only pertaining to the common female protagonists that are portrayed in WESTERN media.
@CJ yes. Problem with that?
@@ぷードーモ dont reply to them with a comment explaining yourself, these people are degenrates and would fold so hard in a IRL confrontation.
Does Disney hate children now? They've ruined everyone's favourite fairytale stories countless times and now they've devastated the child actors in this film as they read all the negative reviews about this abominaton of a film. Disney magic seems to have become Disney malignity.
Quite the opposite. Disney wants to brainwash and exploit children to push their propaganda while they diddle them.
Did they really devastate the actors in the movie?
@@artisticalex1206 "Have they really devastated..."
If you want to start an argument or ask meaningless questions, get some correct grammar skills.
@@jonbuono7826 I’m not trying to start an argument I just truly wanna know if the actors are upset about the reviewers negative reviews.
@@artisticalex1206 I'd say yes, Disney is probably home to a few danger haired pedos now!
Where did wendy learn how to use a sword if her family wanted her to be a traditional Victorian woman?
The only thing worse than the thumbnail is this movie
Feminist jumpscare
@Chris Terry What would be his taking here?
I didn't even notice how Wendy looked like in thumbnail 😅
Shark tale vibes 😆🗿
@@dewolf123 Her uhhhh...Her lower backside.
Wendy : "I am no boy!"
Witch King of Angmar : "Aren't you in the wrong movie?"
That part where he cuts Hook's hand and give it to the gator is true. He is a psychopath 😂😂
i was in prison with a gangster that cut off someones hand with a sword over a pub football match. psychopath confirmed
I know, I was the gator
In the original story, Peter Pan had a horrible memory, too. He forgot all kinds of things and people and events and where he was or what he was doing. Basically, he was Joe Biden with a sword.
"Only on Streaming" is the new "Straight to DVD."
Yep.
Not really. Tons of great indie films that don’t get theatrical releases.
Controversial opinion:
The indian scene in the orignal cartoon wasnt offensive. Was it stereotypical? Sure. But so was its portrayal of pirates...mermaids...boys..etc. the indians were sharing their culture with the boys who are excited to join in their culture and customs.. nothing but respect and reverance by the young boys to the tribe.
Even after the tribe took them prisoner initially because they didn't trust them.
It's literally my favorite part of the original hah.
To be honest I don't find that scene offensive at all, The Natives were nice and they portrayed them accurately. And Peter and Wendy were not being racist to them.
this, the only real change it needed was more accuracy in language and customs but that's too much work for modern disney, just scrub them from the movie except strong female indian girl so they can double up the "strong female representation"
I agree, I agree. I talk to a good friend of my whose native American and they weren't offended ever
Was it bad enough for them to edit out of their animations?
The thing that make 0 sense to me is having lost girls. Like the whole point of the lost boys was that they had never seen a girl so windy acted like a mother figure to them. It defeats the whole purpose of the lost boys to begin with!
😂😂😂 omg I hated ALL the characters besides the parents.
Okay Wendy’s brothers were okay.
hook was alright
so was mr smee
the best one has to be the dog Nana
I just read that Peter and Wndy was originally supposed to be released in theaters in 2021, but then the pandemic came and the film was shelved. But over the past two years, it underwent changes, new scripts, reshoots and cuts to fit the Disney+ format and be released on streaming instead. For this reason, it would be interesting to see and know what the 2021 version would have been like if it had been realized.
the second i saw the tralier i busted out laughing, knew it was gonna be dreadfull
This depiction of Nederland looks like a normal ass island. No mythical creatures, no mermaids, no cool Jungles or fantastical forests, no tree houses or cool fortresses. How do you have a magic island with no freakin' magical stuff?
I know, right? How can you mess up "tropical island?"
My favorite part was when Tiger Lilly and Tinkerbell do the fushion dance to become Slay Queen Cleopatra.
"Why is dying alone a happy thought? Usually it's the opposite-"
I agree lol
I love the part where the lost persons ask Wendy to read them a bedtime story and she replies saying “not only will I read the story but I’ll make the bloody movie for you because that’s how fucking amazing I am “
"The Lost Persons" 😂😂😂
Dont forget a line from wendy when they ask her to be their mother : "I dont even know If I want to be a mother"
Are you serious?! 😒 🙄
Nothing wrong with that though. Not everyone wants children.
@@elizabethscott7904 out of context is not wrong, but is the constant abuse of this ideas on recent disney films that makes them feel forced. Is just feels like Disney trying to hard
@@elizabethscott7904 Back then it was rarer & I remember that the Peter Pan movie was taking place during the War. Also have in mind that before modern technology people had more children mostly because of the lack of effective contraceptives & society wasn't that promiscuous back then. Originally Wendy was mature & motherly not an angry feminist with a modern mindset.
@elizabethscott7904 It's not that she doesn't want to be a mother. It's that she acts superior to everyone because of this stance.
"Same ideals as a woman from the 21st century" 😂😂😂
It's true though, dating is so difficult due to this "I don't need no man" mentality
Wait until the government goes bankrupt. That will change very quickly.
Or maybe you just can’t pull 😂
Don't give up, there are many women that are not like that! But yeah, be careful 😂
lesbianism
Treat woman like scum, it works!
My favorite part of the movie is when Wendy looked around and realized the destruction and death she was responsible for and put down her gauntlets, and adopted two young girls whose parents had died recently.
Reaper: "Peter Pansexual"
Me mid-breakfast at 5:36 a.m.: Thanks Reaper, have to clean my desk now because I spat out my tea.
i assume you're British sir, have a good morning from colonies of Canada.
I suppose they had to change Hook from a bad guy to a good guy because it would be ableism to present someone with a hook hand as being evil. They would be accused of hating the disabled.
In all the other versions Peter was actually the one who cut off Hook's hand and fed it to the crocodile. He has always been somewhat immoral and sociopathic. The problem here is that this version of the character lacks any kind of charm and charisma, so his asshole nature stands out more.
Exactly! And in the other versions hook was much more of a dick so you honestly weren’t that horrified by it. I mean the dude was constantly trying to murder children.
I do kind of feel bad for Hook at times as he's always being tormented by that crocodile (because of Peter Pan) but he's not supposed to be good in any way, he's still a manipulative murderer who tries to kill children and has even killed his own men for no real reason
@Leah-Marie because kids were cooperating with Peter so he saw them as enemies as well. Maybe kids should have questioned the reality instead of assuming that someone is a bad guy who should be bullied just because Peter does it and makes it seem ok. And I remember, he did offer them to become pirates but they refused and said that they will support Peter till the end. The actions of Peter made him slightly crazy, sure, but kids were also bullying him for no reason
@@LucasBR702 maybe not with Cruella or Maleficent but it could work with Hook if the writers had put more effort into it instead of lumping so much of different things into one pile of bs (there has to be a clear focus on something specific but the writers wanted to do everything all at once).
@@LucasBR702 Yep, to make it as grim as possible. It would have been cool to see a thriller/horror drama about Peter pan from a different psychological angle
"Tinkerbell showed up to rob the place"
Subscription earned +1
How can I possibly enjoy this movie when it lacks the 'DIVERSITY' and 'REPRESENTATION' of MY PRONOUNS???
Omg stop.
@@MixerHaven1975 i think he was just taking the piss
They are so regressive for casting only 2 of the 73 and a half genders out there
Fuck off and fuck your fake diversity shit, Leave Hollywood alone
One of the saddest features of our times is that you can no longer be sarcastic with people who don’t know you, as no matter how ridiculous your comment is, it won’t even be the most absurd thing uttered in the preceding 5 minutes!
There was already a great live action Peter Pan movie from 2003. I remember renting that from Blockbuster and watching it with my family. Also, the Tinker Bell movies are fun as well.
Yeah, I'm going to rewatch that soon. I recall it doing some good stuff with Pan's character. And Jason Isaacs was a terrific Hook.
@@Swiftbow Mr. Isaacs was also Mr. Darling in this one ! :0
And it's bloody interesting
The 2023 movie is basically an attempt to remake and / or copy the 2003 masterpiece, resulting in a garbage.
@@jefuru5788 Well, the 2003 movie isn't Disney. That's partly why it followed the book a LOT more closely. The biggest change was in the climax with Peter and Wendy... which I thought was really effective and something the book hinted at, but never fully embraced.
The original Disney cartoon followed the book for the most part, too... at least on the major plot beats. They simplified and glossed over a lot of the grittier stuff. I do love both versions. (Not this new travesty.) The old cartoon is the most fun version... the 2003 is fun, too, but also leans more into the themes of why growing up (while not forgetting the value of youth) is a good thing.
The 2003 version was perfect. I’ll stick with that
Hearing Al Pacino say “you stupid f***ing cu**” was so appropriate here an the best thing I ever heard lol I am dying.....
Looking at these clips, all I can think is "Why is everything so goddamn dark?!" Half the scenes are borderline imperceptible with how dark the color grading is! This is supposed to be a KID'S MOVIE! Where's the color?! Where's the shine?!
It's only supposed to be dark during the opening and maybe ending scene, the real world parts
Going to watch Hook this weekend to see how a remake/sequel is done right.
RIP Robbin Williams.
I love your delivery bro! Glad to see honest reviews from real people...the accent is just gravy! Disney sucks now.
I also just watched the Critical Drinker's review on this movie. It's nearly identical to this one to the point i'm certain he watched this one before making his own. I legit had a deja-vu.
Everybody with a brain has the same things to say about the film
"Peter Pansexual" 🤣🤣
I laughed my arse off through the whole review. Thank you Reaper, for giving such a brutally honest and amusing review of this total piece of dog ****.
How dare they not cast a ginger as Peter, we need more ginger representation!
Hell no. Get a soul, ginger boy!
In this movie, we get Peter Pan after a few bottles of Bud Light. Wendy "yaaaas Queen!" , and Tinkerbell "I'm just here to rob the place" .
Well played Reaper, jolly well played!
“No this magic belongs to no boy.” 🤮
better exchange
Hook: you have his magic!?
Wendy: it wasn't his to begin with
@@liamdalemon1525 Agreed 🙏
Again, like their live version of Pinocchio, or other films like The Woman King, or stories about social stratification in Victorian England depicting all black people as wealthy nobles, the wokeness managed to completely undermine the story's messages. In the book, the Lost Boys are described as having no girls beccause girls aren't stupid enough to fall out of their baby carriages. Wendy plays a maternal role to them, and it is her mature maternal instincts that inspires growth in the boys. But they instead choose to throw out all motivation and growth and learning because everyone starts out as ideal (which, by woke standards, means rude, selfish, and rejecting love as weakness) cookie-cutter figures with level playing fields instead of facing adversity and difference, and even finding value in differences. That's why the woke movement is undermining black rights, women's rights, gay rights, etc. It is a self-destructive movement of ignorant fucks whose sole value is being different for the sake of being different, and yet vilifying and denying difference simultaneously.
Good to know that woke girls are retarded. I kinda noticed when I met them in my last years of college
This 👆
Exactly. Its like they needed to watch the old movies in order to actually learn and mature
I personally think Hook was the best representation of Peter Pan since the original with some new additions. To this day, it’s still one of my favorite films because it runs the gamut of emotions and is a joy to watch.
Same, every time i watch it, it makes me miss Robin Williams so much. 10/10 movie
Have you seen it as an adult? I heard it's kind of a bummer but I remember it being so great
'Peter Pansexual' 😂 I lost it
I had to cleanse my eyes by watching the Peter Pan 2003 adaptation. It's arguably the best direct live-action adaptation of Peter Pan. No identity politics, no feminism.
I just rewatched the 2003 version. It was beautiful, funny, magical, good characters, everything this movie is not. When Peter got wounded by Hook at the Black Castle, for the rest of the movie you can see that scar. The fairies were beautiful and GLOWED, music was fantastic, there was character growth. One shot from that movie had more color than this entire movie combined
it's people like you that Save me hours of my life!
Loved the part when Wendy suplexed the pirate ship and blocked a cannonball with her Thanos jaw.
"Tinker bell doesnt glow because unrealistic" Disneys fall from grace makes me sadder every day
What i really hate the most is how they decided to make the female characters not nice, kind, and compassion cause it's considered "weak" to the writers and it's frustrated.
To them, women who are dicks are strong badasses who can do anything and women who are kind and compassionate are weaklings who'll get nowhere in life. As a strong woman who is also very kind and sweet, this trope makes me wanna bash my head against a wall. I'm not one to say "I'm offended", because that phrase has practically no meaning anymore. But honestly, with how much Disney has been pushing that trope...I feel insulted.
Remember when it was the villains who mocked these qualities and not the heroes?
Fauna: "Maleficent doesn't know anything about love, or kindness, or the joy of helping others. You know, sometimes I don't think she's really very happy."
Gaston: What's the matter, beast? Too "kind and gentle" to fight back?
Frollo: You idiot! That wasn't kindness! That was cunning! Gypsies are not capable of real love!
“later on that night, black Tinker Bell shows up to rob the place” 😂 ooooh no
I liked the scene at the end when Hook reveals he's Pans father.
I suppose I should buy a copy of the book before the sensitivity sensors get ahold of it.
6:07 You got no chill LMAOOO💀
"Peter Pansexual" I laughed harder than I should’ve
That comment about the original having a certain charm is spot on. What holds up the best is the effects they have on tinkerbell. Those fairy dust looks so damn good and must have taken alot of drawing work
Plus she had that dump truck 🍑
And she was never black to start with, eithet
@@adil0028 that's not even the biggest issue it's how bland and unforgettable she was in the remake.
@@lRedPosion it very much is. We can't just let these black people steal whatever they want
@@lRedPosion…Don’t you mean “forgettable”?
No villains. No heroes. No point.
"Black Tinker Bell shows up to rob the place" 😂😂😂
"Peter Pansexual" you got a good chuckle out of me with that one haha, this is one of my new favorite channels, the voice and straightforward way you talk and insult everything is very funny to me
You know I never thought a Peter Pan film should have ended with the ship crashing with everyone on board but hey ho here we are!
OG Wendy would never act like that to her brothers. She would die for those boys, she is the kindest and most responsible and caring older sister I've ever seen in a book/movie. What they did to her in that trainwreck of a movie sickens me. She was genuinely the sweetest kid ever, and there is were her strength lies. But no, they had to turn her in to a little bitch (no shame on the actress tho, I know she is a child and that horrible script was not her fault)
Peter threw Hook's hand to the crocodile in the original story too, but in that version he had admirable traits like giving Hook a leg up in a duel on marooner's rock only for the captain to fight dirty and rake Peter's arm or to allow Wendy to fly away on John's kite as he stayed behind to drown.
Was about to say, that's in the original story, Peter did do that too hook.
@@ShaDO118k Hook even says he prefers the hook to his hand as it gives him an advantage to killing, he just hates that the croc has a taste for him now.
Why did he cut off Hook’s hand in the original movie?
@@nont18411 Sometime before the story, Captain Hook and his crew of pirates invade Neverland. Peter Pan, known as the protector of Neverland, intervenes, and a mutual duel commences with Hook. Peter gets the upper hand, literally, and feeds it to the ancient crocodile that was nearby. I suppose Peter did so to teach the pirate a lesson.
@@nont18411 There's also a symbolic meaning. Peter Pan incarnates childhood while Hook represents adulthood and all the serious things that go with it... including death, whom the crocodile with a ticking clock is an allegory for.
The narrator's accent and vocal inflections makes what he's saying even more funny! 💯
Btw peter pan was originally meant to be seen as the villain in Disney but the animated version made him seem like the good guy for children but if you seen dark theory videos you would understand why he seems like a damn like psycho path lol
The problem here is that the writers don’t actually intend Peter to be the villain. They think he’s the hero (after the women Ofcourse) here that only made a tiny mistake.
.
If they stuck to the original story without having some out-clause of “let’s relate to the villain because he’s actually not bad” then I think it still would have been a good movie. Not this.
@@amyqb117 Ik the problem was that Disney is trying their hardest to not seem so sexiest or racist to our generation and to our new city of people getting offended so easily. I just thought I point out how he is technically a villain, but the movies have ruined their original plan to make him be seen as the great hero and loveable character which they failed to do in this movie and it's just so fucking boring to watch legit after the first 20mins I turned it off lmao.
There's a channel, and of course I can't remember the name of it, but the channel has videos titled "The disturbing origins of" And Peter Pan really is pretty fucked up 🤣🤣🤣 This movie however is completely neutering this character. I don't get why they had to make Wendy such a bitch, and Peter such a pussy when Wendy was fascinated with the stories, and Peter was a daredevil. What makes them think this is going to work???
Yeah, the original idea was that Peter is a sinister boy that likes sadism but the animated Disney cartoon added more comedy and slightly altered the original grim story (because they wanted to make the story less dark for kids, like they did with the Hunchback of Notre Dame animated film by excluding the tragic ending of all three main characters). The problem with the remake is that it was poorly planned and done, the acting was unimpressive and the dirty swamp filter ruined the movie experience, as well as made scenes look empty and dull. There are many different ways on how to make a refreshing new story but unfortunately, the director is prioritizing agenda before a good story
He is clearly the hero in the book
the 2003 peter pan will always b my fav. I do believe in fairies, i do, i do. so iconic
What is the message for modern audiences? You don't need talent as long as you align yourself with "the message".
I can just feel the spit of frustration hit my face @ 0:30
Wendy(ft. Peter Pan)
6:38 Ironically, those cannonballs were the only balls allowed in the movie…
The first TH-cam video that consists of only interrogative sentences.
Holy shit! I thought the thumbnail was edited, but damn! God added too much spacing between her eyes 😂
Anyone else waiting for the drinker’s inevitable video?
Edit: I realise it was a bit cheeky to post about another TH-camr in the comments. However having now watched the video I have to say it was hilarious. Well done sir.
Yes
He would rip this apart... Believe That!
I expect lots of "f*ck off film!" 🤣
Would love Reaper on the Drinkers Happy Hour along with Disparu!
Fuck no; I'm just here to laugh at adults bitching about kids' shows they're not forced to watch..
Something Something the message and drunk sex with Russian hooker...
Seriously don't know what's worse:
Woke trash shows...
Or the TH-camrs that build their fame upon them
Peter pan cutting off Hooks hand and feeding it to the crocodile is accurate. Its the reason why the croc keeps stalking Hook, he just tasted too good 🥰
"Their brother John who looks like Harry Potter" 😂. The funniest part is I've done fanvideos for the 2003 Peter Pan where I used Harry Potter for clips of "older John Darling" so this is spot on.
No plan to watch the movie, your review was hilarious and I enjoyed the interspersed memes. I hope they keep churning out these mediocre moves for more of this content.
Why do you want content about trash shows you don't watch????
@@darrengordon-hill Because they are actually entertaining..and free!
Same. I like Disney remakes but I haven’t seen this nor do I plan to because this actually looked bad to me.
I literally saved time and braincells watching this instead of the actual movie
Brutal and brilliant review, round of applause!
The significance of the passage of time .... 😂
Gotta say, the biggest surprise here is the sympathetic Hook, I thought this card was for villain ladies only.
Cant wait to know why Frollo was right about burning up Paris now lmao
Will never happen, Esmeralda will burn him instead because feminism
Dude, that thumbnail is literally fucking terrifying. Oh my God.
9:51 i thought she DIDN'T want to go to school when her mother told her about it...
Her happy thoughts are fucking dying alone 😂
Pleaseeee never stop making these content !!!!!!
You talking to Disney?
Cos that's how we got this trash...
In the original story, Peter Pan was a cautionary tale about the dangers of wanting to stay childish and irresponsible instead of “growing up” and becoming a functioning adult
Ah shit, here we go again 🗿
3:37 I think I heard the actual reason is even more stupid: the glowing would be unrealistic. Yeah, the literal fairy is fine, but a glowing fairy is just too much.
Critical Drinker: Can I copy your homework?
Reaper: sure, just change it a bit so it doesn’t look like you copied
I legit thought I was going crazy with the déjà vu! Which review was uploaded first?
@@justhereforthetragedy I’m pretty sure Reaper beat Drinker by a day. Which, I mean, I understand they both must have been working on it for a while, so maybe it’s just congruent thinking.
came here for that commentary XD They are almost identical rewiews, even the video inserts are the same (like that one with Cruela and Maleficent)