Hats off to Lupita Nyongo, the woman who was initially offered the lead role. She took one look at the subject material and drop kicked it to the curb, citing she “would not be supporting a movie glorifying slave traders”
@@mansamusa8410 So? Strong isn't necessarily a compliment, it's just an adjective. Something can be strong and bad at the same time. The Dahomey were strong, and they were also slavers that actively participated in the slave trade.
@@jacobcox4565 but they weren't the only African nation participating in the slave trade whatever happened to Nuance or histories complicated people are complicated the dahomey did what was in there best interest enslave or be enslaved
@@mansamusa8410 Actually, the Dahomey enslaved other people because it made them rich and powerful, even after Britain abolished slavery, the Dahomey still participated in the slave trade with Middle Eastern countries
@@jacobcox4565 no they did not do the slave trade with with middle eastern countries what the hell are you talking benin is no where near the middle east about where are your sources
The Frenchman (the one who came to buy slaves) says "my country is rich because of the slave trade" when in reality it was the King of DAHOMEY who said it to the Frenchman who actually came to tell them to stop slavery. It is laughable!
Only because of the Industrial Revolution making much of the human labor obsolete. British had an empire do you really believe they did that solely because “slavery bad” and had African natives best interests in mind? Especially with all the colonialism and neocolonialism that proceeded after? So let’s cut the bullshit of the British being this benevolent being and thinking all of Africa is some monolith with no internal conflicts.
the far left sjw pedo freaks want us to beileve the king wanted it to stop and the British where the ones complaing got to love far left sjw propaganda🤣🤡
If it ever again came to the European that he will no longer protect Europeans. They would be calling him a doctor. Because they would think he was having a stroke.
Hey dude, I'm a nigerian and hearing about the woman king being based on what i've been taught to be part of yoruba history i thought the film would at least acknowledge the fact that alot of african tribes actively participated in the slave trade but even resisted the abolition of slavery in west africa. It's also funny considering how misogynistic nigeria (africa in general) is, that they'd assume a bunch of female warriors were even remotely given any iota of respect or authority. great video ! at least somebody did their research haha!
😂 God the people that made this people just keep sounding stupider and stupider. I'm really starting to wonder if the script was written in crayon and finger paint during a special needs creative writing workshop
@@mansamusa8410 Not as many as were captured by the Arabs and put into slavery. More died in the forced march back to their lands than died on the ocean voyages.
Woman King: "We fought the colonizers" Actual history: "The Dahomey tribe were for slavery and fought to keep it. The tribe suffered losses in the hundreds while the French lost only a few men and made them stop practicing slavery. Also stop washing the history of African slavery" Woman King: "REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
Retelling history like they did in this movie would be like making a movie about Adolf Hitler and the plot being "A misunderstood Austrian veteran, who against all odds, pulled a country back from the edge of collapse, bringing the country a new age of new technology, wealth, patriotism and prosperity" while completely ignoring all the awful things he and others did in his name and completely skipping over the years 1939 - 1945.
You know something’s wrong when a movie franchise based on a Disneyland ride (if I’m not mistaken) is more accurate to history than a serious documentary
I was genuinely surprised that woke hollywood made this movie🤔🤔 Many of us in Africa, especially us Nigerians, know of how Dahomey and other tribes here before Europeans came, were slaver kingdoms that only stopped slavery because, ironically, the Europeans conquered them and forced them to stop slavery. Who thought this movie was a good idea?!
Wanna know the true irony? Viola Davis' ancestry has been tracked as a response to this film, and it turns out she is pretty much guaranteed to be a descendent of slaves literally taken and sold by the woman she is championing. She is championing the woman who put her ancestors in chains and sold them to the white people whose descendents she hates so much.
Funfact: The female warriors of the dahomey only ever had one deployment. they were massacred to the point only about ten of them survived. They mostly spent their time drinking and partying, instead of training.
@@iamsinistar8971 The French🤣🤣🤣🤣 And to give you an idea of just how badly these women sucked at their one job, the battle they fought with the French ended with them suffering like 500+ (can't recall the actual number, but it was in the hundreds) losses... and about 6 French soldiers dying... This movie gets basically everything wrong
@@DelightfullyMADD That is the saddest casualty rating i've ever seen in history. I've read about children in the battle of Berlin with more kills than that. What's the point of it being "based off history" if the only part of it they got right was that they're in Africa?
@@DelightfullyMADD I mean you've got the literal secondary world Super-Power at the time going against one of the smallest african nations on the entire continent. That was never going to end well. All Female Army or not. That's like if Russia Today used all it's resources against *only* a small pacific island.
Why do people act like most historical movies actually follow the historical events. Example is 300. That had very to no historical accuracy yet no one was bitching about it.
@@raheemjenkins6110 You're either trolling or dense. The Woman King claims to be an accurate retelling of history which it isn't, far from it, while 300 never claimed to be historically accurate. Also 300 isn't based on a historical event, it's based on a graphic novel which was an exaggerated and stylized retelling of a historical event which is why no one complained about it and despite that 300 is still more historically accurate than The Woman King.
@@TheSonOfTheDragon The woman king never claimed historical accuracy. Nether did 300. Yet people like you are claiming things the people that made the woman king is not. I watch the Woman King. It said it’s loosely based off historical events. Just like most historical movies are. The only historical movie I’ve ever seen say it was as accurate as possible was Lincoln 2012.
Trust me... kids ain't shit... unless they actually turn out right. As in, are able to find jobs and get the fuck up out of your house after turning 18 and graduating high school. Unti then, they are goddamn bank-account sucking liabilities who the WHOLE WORLD can do without.
Especially if you’re not making at least $50,000 per year. At that salary in today’s day and age, you’re barely even going to be able to feed and house yourself, much less children. Bringing children into this world at a salary less than that is basically bringing them to stand right alongside you… on a Fucking street median… … HOLDING UP A FUCKING CARDBOARD SIGN!!
@@Steven9567 That’s a complicated question with complicated answers. The short answer is that they could get along without it, they had the luxury to focus on its moral evil.
Lupita was going to be in the film? But once learning about the true history. She backed out of the film because she didn’t like the alteration to history. Hopefully she won’t get punished by Hollywood.
She was not and she won't. The general backlash received because of revisionism (from black people most importantly) was so intense that the hopes of being nominated for anything were quitte shattered rapidly after the movie aired
@@marmar-90 she was not, what? She did a documentary about this tribe and spoke to several people, especially an elderly woman who’s mother was the last of that line to be sold in the slave trade.
i went to the cinema with my parents and this was the only movie to watch so let me give you a summary of what happened. My mom fell asleep not even 10 minutes in and my father and I just discussed how bad it was while fact checking it. both my parents say it is the worst movie they ever watched
One actress that had been cast in The Woman King, Lupita N'yongo, dropped out of the movie after she did research into the history and learned about what actually happened.
She actually did a documentary about the Agojie. It’s pretty interesting. Actually explores the culture and history behind Dahomey and the Agojie. Once she learns how they raided for slaves, you can tell she’s horrified by it.
The irony is that in the end, Dahomey was SO entrenched in their slave trading ways that it took a COALITION force composed of British, French, and Oyo soldiers to make them cease practices of slavery.
To be fair those of African blood are the most genetically diverse humans to ever exist with some tribes separated by only a few miles being more diverse the the Anglo Saxon of England to the Yamato people Japan
the biggest difference between this and Braveheart. Braveheart changed historical events to fit into a better movie and to tell a story that meant to inspire people. This movie changes historical events they fit an agenda to make the directors and producers feel better about themselves.
Oh please, how old are you? Braveheart is widely considered the most inaccurate historical film ever made 🤬 For a start, the Scots had stopped painting themselves blue 1,000 years before.... 1,000!!!! And no-one, absolutely NO-ONE was wearing kilts until 500 years after Wallace.....
@@anthonyortiz350 There is one thing I know for a fact (I don't remember other stuff), but he never had an affair with the french princess. She was 9 at the time.
But it is fun to watch reviews of people with actual historical knowledge ripping this trash apart. He didn't even go into the best part, which was how Dahomey was obliterated by the French because they wouldn't stop slaving, and how those all female warriors of theirs literally went less than 1-100 against the French, proving utterly useless against trained men. Pathetic how the movie had them killing Europeans effortlessly and dominate all their own men on top of it. I sometimes wonder if it isn't insanely cringe being a Viola Davis in a film like this. Does nobody in that entire film set ever make a joke and ask for a friendly sparring match to see if the women could actually beat the men? Are they truly all this fucking delusional?
Critical Drinker is way too radically woke. Reaper's soul hasn't been taken by the Jews yet. It'll happen, but as long as he remains a smaller TH-camr, he'll remain free to keep stating the truth. Reaper is much better than Drinker, the woke pussy.
so why didn't the woman king show Nanisca trading slaves for the bottle of booze she puts on her friend's grave at the end of the film? oh yes it's not part of the MESSAGE.
Response is simple: ignorant woke Afro-American cast, directed by woke ignorant white American movie director. So f*ck history of Benin, let's present our narrative
@anthonylopez7887The film takes place in 1823 their war to maintain control of the slave trade was decades later. This wasn't about the Frano-Dahomey war but the Oyo Dahomey war.
Braveheart is one of the most historically inaccurate movies of all time, but it’s still a fun movie. The point is don’t get your history from movies. Find a good book instead.
Back in the times when this movie took place feminism wasn't even a thought,because in order for women to be able to do the things they're allowed to do today,they need a tamed earth and comfortable society. These people don't realize that they can't find any long lasting examples of strong woman empowerment in history because women who tried to do what men did back then had no safety nets or cushy society to rely on.
Umm, what are you talking about? Amina, Queen Elizabeth, Hatshepsut, Nefertiti, Empress Himiko, Boudicca, Joan of Arc, Molly Pitcher, Artemisia and many others throughout the ancient and modern world didn’t have “safety nets or cushy society to rely on” clearly you don’t know world history. Now this films is definitely an insult, not only to the actual country but to many REAL women who achieved greatness in ancient times.
@@fmc291 I dont think thats their point, it was a savage world back then, so women wanting to be in a mans position would be risky. Of course in other societies, like the one the USA hijacked, women were superiors of the grand council, but Irokwa MEN still fought war lol. And Aztecs viewed menstruation as the woman's war in a respectful way so make of that what you will.
'safety nets' and 'cushy society' clues us in on how you really feel about women. Are you done crying anytime soon? Societies weren't safe for women because of men making it so. Because letting women do things and having the same responsibilities was too harsh on male egos.
@@gregrobinette8620 we didn’t hijacked the society Americans just aggressively took control of our own society & sadly Britain was in the way at the time…
Don't put that shit out there mate. Braveheart bothers me and a lot of other Scots already and the misrepresenting of our history. That's a fight woke Hollywood don't want.
If they really wanted to do the strong women warriors trope they should have done something with Scandinavian shield maidens which were female Vikings pretty much.
I'm saving these videos so Susan's boyfriend can't take them away again! Thank you for reuploading the ones that you can Reaper!! These reviews are awesome!
I watched a video a few months ago which went into historical accuracy in movies. The producers and writers have literally said they are going to invent the history that should have been and that they are not going to let historical accuracy get in the way of them imagining something bigger and better. So they have put their cards on the table, they are going to use the media to rewrite history.
@@noahhaupt5343 It’s easier to indulge in ignorance than to do actual research. As a historian of the Civil War (particularly the perspectives of former Confederates) I see this all the time-though perhaps a bit less than several years ago, apparently even Southerners have realized flying a traitor’s flag is cringe.
LOL! The oxymoronic title is almost as great of an example as the twisted story for how devoted people possessed by an ideology can be to forcing their view on everything and everyone; regardless of how badly the fit.
@@wlodek8757 Poland also had a Polar Bear officially enlisted into its army, and he earned multiple awards and went up like three ranks. His statue stands to this day.
I'm amazed they didnt make the king submit his power to that woman while telling her she is amazing and perfect and 100 times more suited to rule than him.
The part about selling palm oil instead of slaves actually is based on something real. The king really did consider doing that. However, he rejected this as unfeasible. And even if it could have worked, who would be gathering the palm oil? Obviously it would be slaves. Just because he considered replacing the slave trade with palm oil trade doesn't mean he was going to abolish domestic slavery.
Unless people stop pandering to these "people" Hollywood, comic books, and literature will only be a memory. They're already rewriting the books, telling you Roald Dahl and James Bond are too radical and insensitive...
I seem to remember Native Americans being portrayed as children of Eden by the colors of the wind Disney crowd. Yup, nothing but sunshine and puppy dog kisses until that evil ship of scum and villainy the Mayflower appeared on the horizon.
imagine a cinema full of beta males, secretly wanting to leave but being afraid of the consequences and punishment of their short haired, grunting libber-gfs😂
The minute I saw the trailer for this film I knew it had to be fake-history. I knew nothing about the tribe but I could tell it was false. Sure enough after a bit of research, I was proved correct. The writers thought they'd win Oscars for this nonsense, hoping nobody would enquire into the actual truth.
I think this is basically what would happen if you have a tool a bunch of Twitter users, gave them a college level world history book, and allowed them to do whatever to the book.
its funny how these strong female characters that beat any men only exist in fiction. Like Cleopatra could only "lead" by seducing other men, but never outright beating them, only persuading them into doing what she wanted.
@@Hongobogologomo oh yes the 5% of the soviet army. what a surprise that u need strong women to defeat normal men. but at the end of they say it shouldnt matter, we should just help each other out in what we can, but nooo women want all the glory with none of the responsibilites and ill gladly flip them off on that.
It's not that they wouldn't give up the slave trade. It was the Dahomey kept harassing and attacking villages in what is modern day Cameroon under French protection. So they had to be dealt with.
4:32 It's hilarious that he used the word "comrade" to describe their own people. I highly doubt they would had used such a word in 19th century Africa. Call me a skeptic but I highly doubt they had read Marx's works.
Hey man just wanna say that youre videos are EXTREMELY entertaining !! I know some of your videos got removed by the YT overlords & I think you're taken back a bit, but to us your viewers, its gold, period. Don't ever stop brother! Keep fighting ! Much love ❤
Agree with most of this apart from your opening statement “they view the female title as lesser than the male title” lmfao I must quibble slightly. I agree it’s a shite titles, that’s not their sexist views tho, that’s just how titles work Its actually a valid point and as a Brit you should be well aware of it 😂 I know the Scouse hate the royals but come one bro. King Charles’ wife’s title is “Queen” Big Liz and Queen Vic on the other hand, their husbands were given the title Prince because King is a higher title than Queen. I didn’t make the rules however that is just a fact lol so everyone both progressives and conservatives see the female title as lower than the males cause, well it’s is.
I agree king outrank queen I'm was just pointing out that for their talk of equality they deep down don't believe the things they say and there use of the the woman King shows this.
@@RealReaper aye it’s was only a minor quibble that I don’t think they’re being sexist thinking King outranked Queen was all. Other than that, arkid I agree. Shit film, shit script, shit story and shit idea. The director, writer and producer should all be banned from making films 😂 keep up the good work anyway :)
@@RealReaper00:00 - 00:15 I understand disliking the film but making comments like this when you know very little about the actual history just makes you look ignorant. When it comes to the title it's from the Fon culture and an actual title that belonged to one of their historical figure princess Hangbe. She was twin sister of King Akaba and also his regent. Princess Hangbe is the one who introduced the Agoji soldier unit, they were originally huntress that were recruited as the royal guard of herself and her brother. When King Akaba passed away she took the throne for 3 years or 3 months becoming Woman King or what has been translated as that title. Since the film takes place in 1823 years after her the film title should have been different. But that's where it is from its got nothing to do with sexism and all that other stuff.
Not only is a lie within lies it's also badly acted. I haven't watched the movie and I don't want to but every little bit I see it looks like trash, also it looks like these woke productions just never have a make up crew for authenticity. They walked through the forest with not a spec of dirt or leaf in site, like they're picture perfect 24/7.
As Idi Amin once said: "There is freedom of speech, but i cannot guarante freedom after speech" You can't have a different opinion because you will get branded "homophobic, racist, fascist, nazi, even fatphobic(why tho), white supremacist, male chauvinist for simply saying something different
The comparison to braveheart is a chefs kiss! Films used to be made to entertain instead of telling people you should like this or you’re racist and if you don’t I’ll give out on twitter
I remember Braveheart having a scene where the English king knocks his sons BF out a tower window. Just writing a scene like that would possibly cause some protests or a riot in today's world. 😂
And Edward the second, the prince wasn't a twink pansy either but a man that as strong as his father that insist returned to battlefield while wounded.
It takes about three seconds of research to know that Dahomey was a slave trading state. Most on the west coast of Africa were. The europeans didn't have the man power to personally capture slaves (also tropical diseases meant that travelling into the interior was basically a death sentence to europeans which is why their 'factories' were coastal forts). They just bought them from the local nations who enslaved them. There's also a very obvious physical reason why pretty much every battle in history was fought between men. I'm not saying women can't fight, but if you had 1000 female warriors vs. 1000 male warriors who had been trained in exactly the same way, then the battle would be incredibly one sided. Braveheart and The Patriot were both retarded historical revisionism. This film seems equally stupid.
![[안방1열 직캠4K] 베이비몬스터 치키타 'DRIP' (BABYMONSTER CHIQUITA FanCam) @SBS Inkigayo 241110](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/tnlxo79cAqY/mqdefault.jpg)
Hats off to Lupita Nyongo, the woman who was initially offered the lead role.
She took one look at the subject material and drop kicked it to the curb, citing she “would not be supporting a movie glorifying slave traders”
She also called them strong you agree with that
@@mansamusa8410 So? Strong isn't necessarily a compliment, it's just an adjective. Something can be strong and bad at the same time. The Dahomey were strong, and they were also slavers that actively participated in the slave trade.
@@jacobcox4565 but they weren't the only African nation participating in the slave trade whatever happened to Nuance or histories complicated people are complicated the dahomey did what was in there best interest enslave or be enslaved
@@mansamusa8410 Actually, the Dahomey enslaved other people because it made them rich and powerful, even after Britain abolished slavery, the Dahomey still participated in the slave trade with Middle Eastern countries
@@jacobcox4565 no they did not do the slave trade with with middle eastern countries what the hell are you talking benin is no where near the middle east about where are your sources
“Disclaimer - no actual Africans were cast in this movie”
Elon Musk is more african than any basketball-american that was cast into this movie.
@@junker1192 I'm sorry that shit was hilarious HAHAHAHA
Im african and i laughed to dead ☠️ 😂
@@junker1192 Sadiq Khan must be considered as the British then according to your logics
That's not true at all the girls actress is from South africa
When Britain enforced the boycott of worldwide slavery, King Gezo of Dahomey was one of the loudest complainers.
The Frenchman (the one who came to buy slaves) says "my country is rich because of the slave trade" when in reality it was the King of DAHOMEY who said it to the Frenchman who actually came to tell them to stop slavery. It is laughable!
Only because of the Industrial Revolution making much of the human labor obsolete. British had an empire do you really believe they did that solely because “slavery bad” and had African natives best interests in mind? Especially with all the colonialism and neocolonialism that proceeded after?
So let’s cut the bullshit of the British being this benevolent being and thinking all of Africa is some monolith with no internal conflicts.
the far left sjw pedo freaks want us to beileve the king wanted it to stop and the British where the ones complaing got to love far left sjw propaganda🤣🤡
@@specialunit0428 also the British banned slavery completely in 1836 yet the empire continued to grow😂😂😂
If it ever again came to the European that he will no longer protect Europeans. They would be calling him a doctor. Because they would think he was having a stroke.
Hey dude, I'm a nigerian and hearing about the woman king being based on what i've been taught to be part of yoruba history i thought the film would at least acknowledge the fact that alot of african tribes actively participated in the slave trade but even resisted the abolition of slavery in west africa. It's also funny considering how misogynistic nigeria (africa in general) is, that they'd assume a bunch of female warriors were even remotely given any iota of respect or authority. great video ! at least somebody did their research haha!
😂 God the people that made this people just keep sounding stupider and stupider. I'm really starting to wonder if the script was written in crayon and finger paint during a special needs creative writing workshop
*Hollywood is braindead and only knows how to write Fiction*
So how many slaves did the Yoruba sell to the Europeans
@@mansamusa8410 Not as many as were captured by the Arabs and put into slavery. More died in the forced march back to their lands than died on the ocean voyages.
This is Hollywood so acknowledging african tribs also sold slaves is...somehow unacceptable.
Woman King: "We fought the colonizers"
Actual history: "The Dahomey tribe were for slavery and fought to keep it. The tribe suffered losses in the hundreds while the French lost only a few men and made them stop practicing slavery. Also stop washing the history of African slavery"
Woman King: "REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
Common French W
the tribe lost hundreds and the French only lost six soldiers. . . Woman King: I don't know about you but that sounds like a solid W to me
Eh oui et après ils nous détestent alors qu'ils parlent tous notre beau langage
God I love french people
"French lost only a few men" thats propaganda.French always surrender.
Retelling history like they did in this movie would be like making a movie about Adolf Hitler and the plot being "A misunderstood Austrian veteran, who against all odds, pulled a country back from the edge of collapse, bringing the country a new age of new technology, wealth, patriotism and prosperity" while completely ignoring all the awful things he and others did in his name and completely skipping over the years 1939 - 1945.
*years 1933-1945
Shitler being Shitler didn’t start and end with WWII
@@warlordofbritannia True, but until 1 September 1939 Hitler had largely achieved his ambitions without firing a shot.
Id watch it
Except that would be much more accurate
@@Romanus- uhh sure
“Pirates of the Caribbean” has more historic accuracy than this crap hole of a movie.
Well that and they’re just good movies in general!
That’s only just a fact though!
Pirates is 100% historicaly correct - " We fight ... SO we can run away!" :D
You know something’s wrong when a movie franchise based on a Disneyland ride (if I’m not mistaken) is more accurate to history than a serious documentary
I was genuinely surprised that woke hollywood made this movie🤔🤔 Many of us in Africa, especially us Nigerians, know of how Dahomey and other tribes here before Europeans came, were slaver kingdoms that only stopped slavery because, ironically, the Europeans conquered them and forced them to stop slavery. Who thought this movie was a good idea?!
And then what happened?
The very people who were once the slaves. I think it’s time we show them who’s really in charge.
Wanna know the true irony? Viola Davis' ancestry has been tracked as a response to this film, and it turns out she is pretty much guaranteed to be a descendent of slaves literally taken and sold by the woman she is championing. She is championing the woman who put her ancestors in chains and sold them to the white people whose descendents she hates so much.
The deluded morons at Hollywood
Funfact: The female warriors of the dahomey only ever had one deployment. they were massacred to the point only about ten of them survived. They mostly spent their time drinking and partying, instead of training.
And let me guess. They threw them at the French or British.
@@iamsinistar8971 The French🤣🤣🤣🤣
And to give you an idea of just how badly these women sucked at their one job, the battle they fought with the French ended with them suffering like 500+ (can't recall the actual number, but it was in the hundreds) losses... and about 6 French soldiers dying...
This movie gets basically everything wrong
@@DelightfullyMADD That is the saddest casualty rating i've ever seen in history. I've read about children in the battle of Berlin with more kills than that.
What's the point of it being "based off history" if the only part of it they got right was that they're in Africa?
Yeah, I’m pretty sure they lost like 500 soldiers to SIX French soldiers.
@@DelightfullyMADD
I mean you've got the literal secondary world Super-Power at the time going against one of the smallest african nations on the entire continent.
That was never going to end well. All Female Army or not.
That's like if Russia Today used all it's resources against *only* a small pacific island.
What gets me is the total rewrite of history and then when everyone called them out on it they doubled down like google doesn’t exist lol
Why do people act like most historical movies actually follow the historical events. Example is 300. That had very to no historical accuracy yet no one was bitching about it.
300 wasn't trying to pose as virtuous while lecturing the audience, that's why.
@@karlimo4034 Because one actress in a movie virtual signals makes the whole movie woke?
@@raheemjenkins6110 You're either trolling or dense. The Woman King claims to be an accurate retelling of history which it isn't, far from it, while 300 never claimed to be historically accurate. Also 300 isn't based on a historical event, it's based on a graphic novel which was an exaggerated and stylized retelling of a historical event which is why no one complained about it and despite that 300 is still more historically accurate than The Woman King.
@@TheSonOfTheDragon The woman king never claimed historical accuracy. Nether did 300. Yet people like you are claiming things the people that made the woman king is not. I watch the Woman King. It said it’s loosely based off historical events. Just like most historical movies are. The only historical movie I’ve ever seen say it was as accurate as possible was Lincoln 2012.
"Its just like modern day feminists who work high paying jobs and have no family or kids, minus the alcoholism" has me rolling 😂😂😂
Trust me... kids ain't shit... unless they actually turn out right. As in, are able to find jobs and get the fuck up out of your house after turning 18 and graduating high school.
Unti then, they are goddamn bank-account sucking liabilities who the WHOLE WORLD can do without.
There’s nothing wrong with not being married and not having kids.
Especially if you’re not making at least $50,000 per year. At that salary in today’s day and age, you’re barely even going to be able to feed and house yourself, much less children. Bringing children into this world at a salary less than that is basically bringing them to stand right alongside you… on a Fucking street median…
… HOLDING UP A FUCKING CARDBOARD SIGN!!
@@karami8844 but funny tho
I wouldn’t be surprised if feminists right now or down the road become alcoholics.
The fact they say they fight agest slavery but yet the British fought them to stop it
Of course, that’s after the British profited from slavery for a few hundred years.
History is messy 😂
@@warlordofbritannia the british hardly profit form it if they did then why end it?
@@Steven9567
That’s a complicated question with complicated answers. The short answer is that they could get along without it, they had the luxury to focus on its moral evil.
@@warlordofbritanniayou didn't answer the question if it was so profitable why did they end it
@@Steven9567
I did. It’s because the moral issue of slavery came to outweigh its economic profits.
Lupita was going to be in the film? But once learning about the true history. She backed out of the film because she didn’t like the alteration to history. Hopefully she won’t get punished by Hollywood.
She was not and she won't. The general backlash received because of revisionism (from black people most importantly) was so intense that the hopes of being nominated for anything were quitte shattered rapidly after the movie aired
@@marmar-90 she was not, what? She did a documentary about this tribe and spoke to several people, especially an elderly woman who’s mother was the last of that line to be sold in the slave trade.
Hopefully she keeps that energy when she gets cast as race and gender swapped superman or some shit.
She was not punished and won't be
Punctuation isn't your strong suit
i went to the cinema with my parents and this was the only movie to watch so let me give you a summary of what happened. My mom fell asleep not even 10 minutes in and my father and I just discussed how bad it was while fact checking it. both my parents say it is the worst movie they ever watched
I’d either prob be laughing at the movie or fall asleep too
That's saying something since your mother slept through it.
@@Coramelimane OP might have been dreaming?
I love when movies based in history gloss over the bad to make it look more nicer and modern like
and the funny thing is they have the nerve to lecture us whites that we gloss over history the irony 🤣
One actress that had been cast in The Woman King, Lupita N'yongo, dropped out of the movie after she did research into the history and learned about what actually happened.
great move, at least she kept her pride👍
I admire her for doing what’s right and not doing a roll of slave rulers with flawed history
She actually did a documentary about the Agojie. It’s pretty interesting. Actually explores the culture and history behind Dahomey and the Agojie. Once she learns how they raided for slaves, you can tell she’s horrified by it.
@@SpiderkillersInc Thanks for that info. I'll have to look up that documentary.
The irony is that in the end, Dahomey was SO entrenched in their slave trading ways that it took a COALITION force composed of British, French, and Oyo soldiers to make them cease practices of slavery.
Many of these people infected with brain slugs will say this cast is very diverse
It's almost at 100% diversity. Needs less huwhytes though.
To be fair those of African blood are the most genetically diverse humans to ever exist with some tribes separated by only a few miles being more diverse the the Anglo Saxon of England to the Yamato people Japan
@JoseSanchez-fk9dg No, I will not be fair and sounds like a lot of incest then. Can't even get DNA out of the county
@@JoseSanchez-fk9dg >seeing it......
the biggest difference between this and Braveheart. Braveheart changed historical events to fit into a better movie and to tell a story that meant to inspire people. This movie changes historical events they fit an agenda to make the directors and producers feel better about themselves.
What did Braveheart do?
It changed some historical details to tell a better story
Oh please, how old are you?
Braveheart is widely considered the most inaccurate historical film ever made 🤬
For a start, the Scots had stopped painting themselves blue 1,000 years before.... 1,000!!!!
And no-one, absolutely NO-ONE was wearing kilts until 500 years after Wallace.....
I meant what did it specifically change?
@@anthonyortiz350 There is one thing I know for a fact (I don't remember other stuff), but he never had an affair with the french princess. She was 9 at the time.
as a black dude i salute you for watching this bullshit because i sure as hell wasn’t 😂
Based
You just won the internet.
I admire your honest sir:)
But it is fun to watch reviews of people with actual historical knowledge ripping this trash apart. He didn't even go into the best part, which was how Dahomey was obliterated by the French because they wouldn't stop slaving, and how those all female warriors of theirs literally went less than 1-100 against the French, proving utterly useless against trained men. Pathetic how the movie had them killing Europeans effortlessly and dominate all their own men on top of it. I sometimes wonder if it isn't insanely cringe being a Viola Davis in a film like this. Does nobody in that entire film set ever make a joke and ask for a friendly sparring match to see if the women could actually beat the men? Are they truly all this fucking delusional?
"You haven't bought Her yet don't destroy the merchandise"
😭😭👌
My jaw dropped when I heard that, unexpected but funny
"this film is full of women full of penis envy" - pure gold! 😂
Just discovered this channel and it's like if Critical Drinker and Paddy Pimblett had a baby. Love it
Mr plinkett more like it*
Same here
😂👍🤝
Critical Drinker is way too radically woke. Reaper's soul hasn't been taken by the Jews yet. It'll happen, but as long as he remains a smaller TH-camr, he'll remain free to keep stating the truth. Reaper is much better than Drinker, the woke pussy.
And probably also Scottish, kinda sounds like a Glasgow accent :) Both brilliant channles.
so why didn't the woman king show Nanisca trading slaves for the bottle of booze she puts on her friend's grave at the end of the film?
oh yes it's not part of the MESSAGE.
Response is simple: ignorant woke Afro-American cast, directed by woke ignorant white American movie director. So f*ck history of Benin, let's present our narrative
Critical drinker moment
@anthonylopez7887The film takes place in 1823 their war to maintain control of the slave trade was decades later. This wasn't about the Frano-Dahomey war but the Oyo Dahomey war.
And when faced by a real army these women were decimated. Even when they had modern weapons.
And to add insult to injury, the army in question were the French.
@@samuelbedsole5089only like a couple hundred French bois basically decimate the whole kingdom
@@samuelbedsole5089 Do not mess with baguette boys.
@@chrisjfhelep5095lol
the total statistics as:
almsot the entire women army decimated
6 baguette boys dead
Braveheart is one of the most historically inaccurate movies of all time, but it’s still a fun movie. The point is don’t get your history from movies. Find a good book instead.
this movie is a middle finger to actual history.
Back in the times when this movie took place feminism wasn't even a thought,because in order for women to be able to do the things they're allowed to do today,they need a tamed earth and comfortable society.
These people don't realize that they can't find any long lasting examples of strong woman empowerment in history because women who tried to do what men did back then had no safety nets or cushy society to rely on.
Umm, what are you talking about? Amina, Queen Elizabeth, Hatshepsut, Nefertiti, Empress Himiko, Boudicca, Joan of Arc, Molly Pitcher, Artemisia and many others throughout the ancient and modern world didn’t have “safety nets or cushy society to rely on” clearly you don’t know world history. Now this films is definitely an insult, not only to the actual country but to many REAL women who achieved greatness in ancient times.
@@fmc291 I dont think thats their point, it was a savage world back then, so women wanting to be in a mans position would be risky. Of course in other societies, like the one the USA hijacked, women were superiors of the grand council, but Irokwa MEN still fought war lol. And Aztecs viewed menstruation as the woman's war in a respectful way so make of that what you will.
'safety nets' and 'cushy society' clues us in on how you really feel about women. Are you done crying anytime soon?
Societies weren't safe for women because of men making it so. Because letting women do things and having the same responsibilities was too harsh on male egos.
@@gregrobinette8620 we didn’t hijacked the society Americans just aggressively took control of our own society & sadly Britain was in the way at the time…
@@juliab9596 no it wasnt. You wouldnt even been supressed, if you were strong.
"With all these women around, they were probably nagged to death!" Hahahaha! 😂😂😂 That was a good one! 😂😂😂
It's movies like these I take "based on a true story" with a grain of salt.
Based on a true story here means there is a continent called Africa and it used to sell slaves.
Only a grain?
@@alsmith9853 it's called a hyperbole.
Grain of a grain a micro of a micro 😂💀⚰️🙈🙉🙊
Can we all just be thankful brave heart hasn't been remade with Jada pinkett Smith as William Wallace
ahahaha, don't conjure it bro!😂
Don't put that shit out there mate. Braveheart bothers me and a lot of other Scots already and the misrepresenting of our history. That's a fight woke Hollywood don't want.
*KEEP MY WIFE'S NAME OUT OF YOUR GODDAMN MOUTH!!!*
If they really wanted to do the strong women warriors trope they should have done something with Scandinavian shield maidens which were female Vikings pretty much.
But they were white, the left doesn’t like that.
They can't do that! That's too white!
yeah but they were white and uninteresting (not as money generating🤑)
They already did that in the Vikings TV show.
Shield Maiden. Accompanied the men to battle and handed them shields when theirs was broken...
I'm saving these videos so Susan's boyfriend can't take them away again! Thank you for reuploading the ones that you can Reaper!! These reviews are awesome!
Susan quit TH-cam lol
@@donjulio5045 Zusan's boyfriend being that new NFT dude.
Who's Susan?
@@gregrobinette8620 lol TBH podcast ... He's a tech support guy
@@donjulio5045 Pyrocynical podcast? Love that man!
I just can’t believe this feminist movie is called the woman king instead of queen 💀
Feminists are not very smart…
**saul goodman live reaction intensifies**
Their whole goal is to just ruffle feathers.
"as the lesbians return to the village."
😂😂😂😂
I watched a video a few months ago which went into historical accuracy in movies. The producers and writers have literally said they are going to invent the history that should have been and that they are not going to let historical accuracy get in the way of them imagining something bigger and better. So they have put their cards on the table, they are going to use the media to rewrite history.
The producers bet all their tokens on a dead man's hand while historians and anyone who Google search for answers had a royal flush
Orwell was an optimist tbh
Why bother making a historical movie if they won’t stick to facts.
@@sweethistortea The people behind such productions have their agendas but depicting truth is not one of them
@@noahhaupt5343
It’s easier to indulge in ignorance than to do actual research. As a historian of the Civil War (particularly the perspectives of former Confederates) I see this all the time-though perhaps a bit less than several years ago, apparently even Southerners have realized flying a traitor’s flag is cringe.
LOL! The oxymoronic title is almost as great of an example as the twisted story for how devoted people possessed by an ideology can be to forcing their view on everything and everyone; regardless of how badly the fit.
I mean, its not oxymoronic in some cultures tbh. Poland for example had a female king(Not queen) for a while. Still shit film lmao
@@wlodek8757 Poland also had a Polar Bear officially enlisted into its army, and he earned multiple awards and went up like three ranks. His statue stands to this day.
"We snuck up on the the village at night to utilise the element of surprise. Then stood there until they noticed us" 🤔
"mom, can we go watch Black Panther?"
"we have Black Panther at home"
*Black Panther at home*
@@insertnamehere5145 The first was already dogshit propaganda.
I'm amazed they didnt make the king submit his power to that woman while telling her she is amazing and perfect and 100 times more suited to rule than him.
💀
Remember kids, if a movie intentionally gets the history wrong andnjust rewrites it. It's called a propaganda.
“Don’t damage the merchandise” 😂
What a quote 😂
The part about selling palm oil instead of slaves actually is based on something real. The king really did consider doing that. However, he rejected this as unfeasible. And even if it could have worked, who would be gathering the palm oil? Obviously it would be slaves. Just because he considered replacing the slave trade with palm oil trade doesn't mean he was going to abolish domestic slavery.
It’s been a pleasure rewatching these bangers😎
There is a third party that played a major role in slavery that never gets talked about....
That 3rd party owned 78% of slave in America.
I'm sure this is just a cohencidence.
who could it be now?
ALIENS! ALIENS! 🤕
Who?
I heard that Katt Williams was offered a part in this movie but his response was " A pimp named Slickback dont do SHIT for Dahomeys"
White man bad is the point of most modern movies now
Fast X have non-white man that playing villain, ant man 3 as well
Because white people were and sometimes still are horrible in this country
Unless people stop pandering to these "people" Hollywood, comic books, and literature will only be a memory. They're already rewriting the books, telling you Roald Dahl and James Bond are too radical and insensitive...
Wow wdm by that
Nooooo not Roald Dahl bro
I seem to remember Native Americans being portrayed as children of Eden by the colors of the wind Disney crowd. Yup, nothing but sunshine and puppy dog kisses until that evil ship of scum and villainy the Mayflower appeared on the horizon.
when in reality their was a lot of war, slavery, and genocide going on long before the Europeans arrived
The Women King is basically black panther if it tried to be a historically "accurate" movie.
For the people who saw this movie , I am sorry you guys went through that lmao
imagine a cinema full of beta males, secretly wanting to leave but being afraid of the consequences and punishment of their short haired, grunting libber-gfs😂
I love the recaps from this channel, this is gold.
Bro I'm rewatching all your videos as if it's my Duty😅
"You said doody."
-Beavis and/or Butthead
@@CowboyRobot2000 -Also Frida from El Tigre
The one I actually feel the most sad for in this film is John Boyega, he must have needed the money.
Probably, he’s the only cast member I still respect. He openly spoke out against China and his career paid for it.
They sought to promote women. They sought to promote Africans. But they had failed to realize that they too, are human.
The minute I saw the trailer for this film I knew it had to be fake-history. I knew nothing about the tribe but I could tell it was false. Sure enough after a bit of research, I was proved correct. The writers thought they'd win Oscars for this nonsense, hoping nobody would enquire into the actual truth.
Those who rewrite the past destroys the future !
So true. Just look at the damage the Southern lie of the “Noble Cause” has twisted our knowledge of the truth of the Civil War.
the accent makes this review so much better😂
I think this is basically what would happen if you have a tool a bunch of Twitter users, gave them a college level world history book, and allowed them to do whatever to the book.
True
Every time he calls them lesbians, I can't help but smile.
Thanks for a real perspective on a movie that very much needed to be stopped before it got the greenlight.
its funny how these strong female characters that beat any men only exist in fiction. Like Cleopatra could only "lead" by seducing other men, but never outright beating them, only persuading them into doing what she wanted.
The only ones I can think of were those soviet women soldiers, that chinese pirate queen of 700 ships, and boudicca.
@@Hongobogologomo oh yes the 5% of the soviet army. what a surprise that u need strong women to defeat normal men. but at the end of they say it shouldnt matter, we should just help each other out in what we can, but nooo women want all the glory with none of the responsibilites and ill gladly flip them off on that.
@@scottjefferson4048
Dude, what’s your damage?
@@Hongobogologomo
Cleopatra actually led troops, at least at the battle of Actium. Though not a head of state, there’s also Joan d’Arc.
Im pretty sure joan of arc killed a guy or two.
Of course they'll lies about history. The truth is way too triggering.
As a Manc, i am delighted to subscribe to this scousers channel, its great !
That was the best narrative of a film I have ever heard ! It had me in stitches 🤣 absolutely 💯
Fun fact the Dahomey were defeated within only a couple days by the French since the Dahomey wouldn’t give up the slave trade
It's not that they wouldn't give up the slave trade. It was the Dahomey kept harassing and attacking villages in what is modern day Cameroon under French protection. So they had to be dealt with.
I just realized that a lot of movies are starting to use the Chinese rope Dart mechanics but don't know how to use the Chinese rope Dart mechanics.
History Buffs isn't going touch this movie with a 5000-foot poll, so thanks for filling me in on THE TRUTH!!
You can practicly see the creators gigling to them selves thinking how smart they are at every stupid scene. It's amazing.
4:32 It's hilarious that he used the word "comrade" to describe their own people. I highly doubt they would had used such a word in 19th century Africa. Call me a skeptic but I highly doubt they had read Marx's works.
Or just being retarded and using a word they thought would fit
Total propaganda. Lupita Nyongo had the sense to pass on the main role.
I love this guy's accent and humour..😂😅
My sister recognized the actor who played the slaver. He played the edgy love interest in After. What a shitty role he got. 🤣
Please do more of these videos, nothing is more enjoyable on TH-cam than your reviews ❤
I’ve always thought the title to be redundant. Thanks for pointing it out.
The first oxymoron: Woman King.
I have not watched this move but im
1 minute and 36 seconds in im laughing so hard your review is hilarious 😂 new sub
This might be the best review I've seen....ever.
As a french, I found that movie hilarious.
I loved the part where the woman king said, "These are my slaves. You can't have them." So inspiring and brave, it brought me to tears.
A woman king... is a queen
Hey man just wanna say that youre videos are EXTREMELY entertaining !! I know some of your videos got removed by the YT overlords & I think you're taken back a bit, but to us your viewers, its gold, period. Don't ever stop brother! Keep fighting ! Much love ❤
AMEN!
I'm subbed and this didn't show up on my reccomended until I looked at my subscriptions
Nearly liked every video too, it's unfortunate the algorithm gotta do him like this, the content doesn't deserve that.
Agree with most of this apart from your opening statement “they view the female title as lesser than the male title” lmfao I must quibble slightly. I agree it’s a shite titles, that’s not their sexist views tho, that’s just how titles work
Its actually a valid point and as a Brit you should be well aware of it 😂 I know the Scouse hate the royals but come one bro. King Charles’ wife’s title is “Queen”
Big Liz and Queen Vic on the other hand, their husbands were given the title Prince because King is a higher title than Queen. I didn’t make the rules however that is just a fact lol so everyone both progressives and conservatives see the female title as lower than the males cause, well it’s is.
I agree king outrank queen I'm was just pointing out that for their talk of equality they deep down don't believe the things they say and there use of the the woman King shows this.
@@RealReaper aye it’s was only a minor quibble that I don’t think they’re being sexist thinking King outranked Queen was all. Other than that, arkid I agree. Shit film, shit script, shit story and shit idea. The director, writer and producer should all be banned from making films 😂 keep up the good work anyway :)
@@RealReaper00:00 - 00:15
I understand disliking the film but making comments like this when you know very little about the actual history just makes you look ignorant. When it comes to the title it's from the Fon culture and an actual title that belonged to one of their historical figure princess Hangbe. She was twin sister of King Akaba and also his regent. Princess Hangbe is the one who introduced the Agoji soldier unit, they were originally huntress that were recruited as the royal guard of herself and her brother. When King Akaba passed away she took the throne for 3 years or 3 months becoming Woman King or what has been translated as that title. Since the film takes place in 1823 years after her the film title should have been different. But that's where it is from its got nothing to do with sexism and all that other stuff.
@@admirekashiri9879 Sir, this is a Wendy's.
@@reharl4953 I'm not American, so translaye please.
Not only is a lie within lies it's also badly acted. I haven't watched the movie and I don't want to but every little bit I see it looks like trash, also it looks like these woke productions just never have a make up crew for authenticity. They walked through the forest with not a spec of dirt or leaf in site, like they're picture perfect 24/7.
As Idi Amin once said: "There is freedom of speech, but i cannot guarante freedom after speech"
You can't have a different opinion because you will get branded "homophobic, racist, fascist, nazi, even fatphobic(why tho), white supremacist, male chauvinist for simply saying something different
As an African. This movie disappoints me
The comparison to braveheart is a chefs kiss! Films used to be made to entertain instead of telling people you should like this or you’re racist and if you don’t I’ll give out on twitter
It’s about time the English get some respect for being the main force to stop the global slave trade.
"You haven't bought her yet. Don't ruin the merchandise" LOL
at last, the algorithm has found a good channel.
you have no idea how long it's been since last time and neither do I
I remember Braveheart having a scene where the English king knocks his sons BF out a tower window. Just writing a scene like that would possibly cause some protests or a riot in today's world. 😂
And Edward the second, the prince wasn't a twink pansy either but a man that as strong as his father that insist returned to battlefield while wounded.
my suspension of disbelief is ruined... but i thank you for telling me what i needed to hear.
one of your best videos ever, giving justice to the real situation and ppl and exposing ideology
It takes about three seconds of research to know that Dahomey was a slave trading state. Most on the west coast of Africa were. The europeans didn't have the man power to personally capture slaves (also tropical diseases meant that travelling into the interior was basically a death sentence to europeans which is why their 'factories' were coastal forts). They just bought them from the local nations who enslaved them. There's also a very obvious physical reason why pretty much every battle in history was fought between men. I'm not saying women can't fight, but if you had 1000 female warriors vs. 1000 male warriors who had been trained in exactly the same way, then the battle would be incredibly one sided. Braveheart and The Patriot were both retarded historical revisionism. This film seems equally stupid.
I mean but there's still more historical context to the dahomey answer honestly to this question who are the mino/ gbeto
At least Braveheart and The Patriot were entertaining and had logically consistent narratives.
@@reharl4953 True dis. The tomahawk fight at the start (despite being stolen shamelessly from Last of the Mohicans) is still pretty cool.
I just found your channel. You are so fucking hilarious 😭😭💀💀I’m waking up the whole damn house w my cackling. You kept spitting fact after fact.
Just discovered your vids, love them
I've not watched a single movie reviewed on this channel but these reviews are hilarious.
I actually cried laughing at this!! Great video, and funny as hell!!
Any film featuring Lasagne Lynch in any sort of role is an instant no from me.