Peter Pan & Wendy DESTROYED By Fans PANICS Critics Reviews
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024
- Peter Pan & Wendy is the latest live-action animation adaptation from Disney. This "re-imagination" for a modern audience on Disney+ is peak modern entertainment. It has everything professional critics want, and solves every issue the entertainment journalists have asked for, but it's not Peter Pan. Tinkerbell, Captain Hook and Peter Pan all return for this Disney remake, but is it worth watching?
Follow me on Twitch = / disparu
Follow me on Twitter = / disparutoo
Gotham Knights Review Playlist = • Gotham Knights Reviews...
Obi-Wan Kenobi Review Playlist = • Obi-Wan Kenobi Review ...
Lord of the Rings: Rings of Power Reviews Playlist = • Lord of the Rings: The...
Playlist of Lord of the Rings: Rings of Power Commentary = • Lord of the Rings: The...
Velma Review Playlist = • Velma Reviews - HBO Max
She-Hulk Review Playlist = • She-Hulk: Attorney At ...
Subscribe to this channel = / @disparutoo
#peterpan #disneyplus #peterpanandwendy
![[TH] FS vs BME - VCT Ascension Pacific - Lower Bracket Final](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wnygqsR2Fig/mqdefault.jpg)
Peter Pan & Wendy is out on Disney+ for the Peter Pan live action re-imagining that no-one asked for and even fewer wanted. It was predicted what this movie would be like from the very first trailers, but I actually think it's worse. This video is a bit of a new style for a review video, a merge of sorts, so let me know what you think of it! Everyone was changed in this movie, Peter Pan was stripped of his heroic deeds, hook was turned into a whimpering emotional wreck, Wendy was turned into a super powered Rey imitation while Tinkerbell lost all her personality. Tiger Lily? Unfortunately stripped of any narrative reason to even be in the movie. This is simply an act of corrupt vandalism from creators who see the past as a list of problems to be "fixed". And yet when they do it, no-one, even the very critics ASKING for these changes, likes the results. Is it time to change? Let me know what you think of Peter Pan & Wendy down below, and as always, thanks for watching :)
It was always Wendy movie :p The writers took that away from "Wendy". Think back to the original, Wendy was the POV character, Peter was the 'hero' but it was from wendys POV.
Wendy was the first Female they'd seen on Neverland. If anyone can be a LOST BOY then it doesn't matter that Wendy is there, init? The reason why they looked up to Wendy is because they were reminded of their mother. Even Hook wanted Wendy because the Pirates missed their mother. "Did they fix the problem of the old canon"? No. They destroyed the point to even have the movie. In attemt of making Wendy a Hero they made her, not the her no the hero 😂 😂
Peter Pan was also Caucasian and Ginger
Just another one for the Disney Gingercide graveyard
Work on that AI boys, then we can turn dross into gold. Suddenly all these bad movies can become good. (and vice versa too, unfortunately)
Hmmm
They wanna say review bombing is just showing ones feeling when it's negative.... next they'll say when a movie bombs its actually a good movie!
3:00 "I suppose it doesn't really matter" They are telling boys that they don't matter. They are literally telling young children that their idenitity is worthless. Just understand the magnitude of horror that this generation is going to have to deal with.
The most under-represented group in Hollywood are people of talent.
You said it.
talented writers being left out. imagine hiring writers who actually gave a fk about Disney classics.
Remember that white men need not apply...Sorry George Lucas, we have the genius of Kathleen Kennedy now!
And gingers 😢
Talented folks deserve equity and inclusion too. Talented Lives Matter.
I love how review bombing just gets dismissed as some trolling tactic when it suits Disney/media outlets, as if
a) it isn't a completely legitimate expression of audience dissatisfaction and
b) there isn't a dearth of places for audiences to provide any sort of feedback to content creators to begin with
OG Wendy: character development..
This Wendy: I'M HULKKKKKKKKKK..!!!!!!!
Wendy can fly by a power of "I no need no man", which we can see from her flash forward sequence.
The best part of Disney movies nowadays is that we'll always get videos like these from people like Disparu who are infinitely more entertaining than the sewage by Disney that he's tearing apart
I didn’t even know about this until my kid put it on. 25 mins later she was on your Nintendo switch, I asked why arnt you watching the movie. She told me it was boring! When a 7 yr old gives a review like that, 🤷🏽♂️maybe they should listen!
They should have called it 'Peter Pan and Mary Sue'.
Don’t worry Disney gots great plans like make bambi but now it’s a doe and dosent see her mother die and the father runs away or dies trying to protect them and the doe ends up not needing any of the friends from the original and kicks all the hunters butts
Wonderland doesn't even seem magical
Was always a big fan of the book and the play with Mary Martin when I was a kid.
The BEST Peter Pan adaptation was already done in the 2000’s.
Knew this one was gonna be trash from the trailer….didn’t know it was gonna be THIS bad tho 😂
Disney is slowly, but steadily, going through its entire catalogue destroying every IP.
I mean yeah. After the 3rd time I figured this was intentional and not them being incompetent.
And once they've finished with that, they will turn to all the cartoons and convert them into woke real-life action films 🤦♂️
It’s intentional. They hate you.
Only live action ive liked was Beauty and the beast but thats it and even that had problems like Emma Watson auto tuned singing for example lol.
And that is glorious!
They ruined Wendy's entire character. She was the matured one, the kind one, and the most loved person. She loved her brothers deeply and protected them from their father. She loved the Lost Boys despite their aggressive ways of playing and their stupid antics. And she loved Peter despite the fact that they have vastly different views about growing up and growing old.
Wendy never screamed, was never violent, and never blamed anyone for her faults.
Wendy wasn’t a “tomboy” in the original Barrie text, but she did create the games John and Michael played. Her archetype should’ve been the “strategist” instead of “warrior.”
@@EbonyPenmarks In the original movie, she was a tomboy in the way she played with her brothers, while remaining a very feminine girl at the same time.
But the concept of a tomboy who is still very much a girl is probably too complex and confusing for the primitive lizard brains of modern Hollywood writers.
@@frankvandorp2059 Tomboys aren't allowed to be girls anymore. Now it's solid evidence they're "trans."
@@frankvandorp2059 That actually sounds like a tomboy. A girl grown up surrounded by brothers who can play boys games because he grew up surrounded by those her early life, but still has her femininity because that is her more natural side.
I suppose in modern times a “Tomboy” is a girl with stereotypical boyish traits; aggressive, sloppy, head-strong, competitive, rough on the edges, etc.
The live action version for me will always be the one where Robin Williams played a Peter Pan as a jaded adult discovering what it meant to be a kid again. A message for children to not grow up too quickly and a message for adults don’t disconnect yourself from your childhood.
Also it had Dante Bosco.
@@CheezitnatorAs well as Maggie Smith.
@@jedimasters1462 Also Dustin Hoffman, Bob Hoskins, and Phil Collins... Face it, every angle had talent thrown at it
And the prequel, 2003's Peter Pan
@@Cheezitnator Thankfully in that movie he didn't get an adult that scarred him.
"we made a native american woman a tomahawk wielding warrior because we're not racist"
- Disney
**red man red song intensifies**
Why can't minorities be portrayed like normal people with the appropriate amount of their culture for their personality and environment mixed in?
Magic -negro- injun.
@@HighLifeProds17 Because they're being used as cultural and ideological weapons
@@HighLifeProds17 In the original, they actually kind of were. Well, “normal” in a relative sense. The whole idea of Neverland in the original was that it was the world from a child’s perspective, and this was back when kids played with “cowboys and Indians” action figures. The way I see it, the Indian tribe in the original was stereotypical, but not racist in a derogatory way.
I love how in the original, the main theme was “Boys need to grow tf up.” …in the remake, its: “Girls can be f-king immature as well.”
Some of whom wrote the movie
Not just boys need to grow tf up, but it’s girls that help them do that.
Either writers are dumb fucks or this is a brainwashing conspiracy, Disney is fucking their own shit up so there must be a sinister reason behind that. Brainwashing young people but what's the goal, to get them young in schools, colleges and brainwash them in schools and colleges and use media to facilitate that process to have control over them in the future hmmmm
Now, wahmens can be selfish f*ck boys who never grow up. Being a mother is so antiquated. Happy Mother's Day! 😄
That makes the remake better 😂
When a little girl manages to physically repel three grown men with swords, you can tell this movie was made in the current day.
Reality: Slight repel. Stab, stab, stab.
“Well, let’s have some lunch!”
I hope [current day] ends soon...
@It's Wesley At least with some anime you can suspend disbelief because you know the context.
And the worse part is that it makes no sense on any level, especially when there is no explanation whatsoever on how is that even possible 🤦♂️🤦♀️🤦 It honestly wouldn't be so bad if we at least got an explanation that these little girls in question were trained in swordfight from their fathers/mothers from very young 🤦♂️🤦♀️🤦🤷♂️🤷♀️🤷
@@kingandrewcecil348 You could have a 1,000 years experience in swordfighting.
If you are a small child (boy or girl, but especially a girl because fun fact men and women are in fact different in inherent strength) you would never be able to overpower three grown men whom you had locked swords with.
Peter Pan was a bit of an exception originally but that was because he never tried to engage in a contest of strength with his swordfighting, instead he used his flight to engage in unorthodox styles of attack from odd angles only he could pull off.
I love how for Wendy her biggest dream was making money and dying alone. Like the saddest view for anyone to have. Its sadder how theyre really pushing the "independent woman" on little girls as if its wrong to depend on someone or to want a family.
Single woman is a perfect consumer!
I mean. Not wanting a family is not wrong (or giving birth) Everyone dies alone anyways. What is weird is that Wendy is having thoughts about that when in the original she didn’t.
@@deathlight4210 dying alone is a lot worse than dying surrounded by, or atleast being loved by your family..and either way clearly that's not the point they're making. Neither are wrong but independence is being pushed so hard it seems like living any other way is looked down upon.
Ebenezer Scrooge who got the bad ending. Like modern promoted happiness is pretty much opposite of happiness in the past.
@@guillaumepalmer6684 single anyone is a perfect consumer
why would you want 2 people that buy for 1 make a couple. just make them divorce.
My 11 year old is arguably one of the biggest Peter Pan fans I’ve ever known. He loves the original. He loves Hook. He loves every adaptation there is that he has seen. This came out 2 days before his birthday and he was looking forward to it. We sat down as a family and watched it. My wife, who does not spend much time on her phone, was on her phone 20 minutes in and just watched periodically. I kept waiting for it to get good. It didn’t.
My 4 other kids were bored to tears. My Peter Pan fan was devastated. He hated it. He said it wasn’t fun. He said it was dark and dreary like the weather outside. He then spent about 30 minutes telling me everything he disliked about it.
The best thing he said: it tried to be entertaining but I would rather watch a bear poop in the water
Bear pooping in the water would at least be interesting bit.
Even based on trailers that Disney version of bear poop looks bleak and dreary, whole thing looks over washed and desolate, like blue gray desert, which is not even visually interesting, just mirthless.
Best review I have heard!
you should watch cocaine bear together in a couple years. i think 12 or 13 would be okay.
Your 11 year old is a young man of impeccable taste and culture. You're a good parent.
Same experience with our 3 kids under 6. They _constantly_ ask to watch Hook and the original Peter Pan. We lost all of them less than 5min in. Who is this movie for?
Peter Pan, a story about growing up and leaving childhood behind, told by people who never grew up and never faced any responsibility or consequences for their actions. Perfect
'Never faced any responsibility or consequences for their actions' So it should be renamed Lost Girls
@@simpdefendmlady6579 this.comment should be pinned
Pretty much.
@@simpdefendmlady6579Congrats for being that guy.
@@simpdefendmlady6579 should be renamed Peter Pansexual
Wendy; a girl from the Early 1900s who acted like a modern day feminist...
A Disney corporate feminist is not an actual feminist.
@@emhu2594 Even feminists no longer know what a feminist is, apparently it's defending men's right to act like stereotyped versions of women now... welcome to the madhouse kitten.
Why do I get the feeling 1900s feminists acted pretty much the same anyway
@@antonioyeats2149 Because they did. Many of them pinned feathers of cowardice on soldiers who refused to enlist in the military edit: they also vandalized shops and buildings during protests
@@antonioyeats2149 And 1st wave granted women the vote without signing up for the Selective Service which remains to this day a massive privilege
It’s baffling how they went from the 2003 live action to this. Never have I once thought Wendy was inadequate or lesser. she wasn’t a girl boss but she was dazzling. a young teen girl infatuated with Peter but graceful, compassionate adventurous and has such determination in everything she does.
Well to be fair, the live action 2003 one wasn't made by disney, it was made by Universal of all studios I'm pretty sure
i find marvelous that Hollywood think that a good female character is a female with "toxic masculinity". For me, the female characters of old were usually so much more interesting than the male characters, exactly because they were, at the same time brave and vulnerable, look to mulan, Kida (atlantis), wendy. I always leaned toward the female characters back then... i love the 2003 live action with every atom of my body, cuz it felt so real, so profound, never read the original tale (i'm brazilian, so this is usually how we have contact with this tales), but i don't think it deviates from it, since the message about growing up is so well portrait there.
@@samcochran8203 yea and was 100% better
The negative reviews for the movie are better than the movie itself.
Doubtless have better writing, more thought, and higher entertainment value
Been that way for a couple of years now.
The YT critics are far more entertaining than the content they're reviewing.
FACTS
I was like dang movie ended , after reading it hahaha
More lucrative as well.
Honestly, how was Wendy not already seen as a strong character? In the original she was a motherly figure who always stood her ground when faced with injustice. She was the one who drew from her experience in Neverland when she realized how awful it would be to never grow up and that change is inevitable but doesn't have to be bad. Wendy is not supposed to be a fighter. Her strengths are her bravery, humility, responsibility and emotional growth.
When is Hollywood going to realize that strength comes in many forms?
Also, what is up with her ending? This movie implies that she will die as a lonely old dried-up sock with no family of her own and that we're supposed to be happy for her because she can play a piano and has some typewriter-related job instead of being a mother (which was never implied to be her only profession in the source material at all). Is Disney trying to tell girls that giving birth and nurturing are sinful acts? Are they saying that children should think their mothers are weak for being mothers? Disney disgusts me.
In the 2003 version, she got a much more satisfying ending, albeit very bittersweet, where she grew up, married, and had a daughter named Jane who also went on a life-changing adventure in Neverland (and the cycle continued with Jane's daughter Margaret). It was a beautiful moment that showed how even though we must all leave our childhood, we will never forget it.
They took out pretty much all of her motherly traits starting with that scene where she blames her brother. When she rises up, her happy thoughts do not involve starting a family. She grows old and is shown alone. Great message Disney.
Agree. In fact, in the 1953 animated classic, Wendy is in fact the reason what made the maturity-hating Peter Pan to finally put aside his dislike of growing up in favor of saving Wendy, John, Michael and the Lost Boys from Captain Hook and his pirate crew and taking the Darling siblings home despite Peter himself wanting them to stay in Neverland. Which means, ironically in the original cartoon Peter learned to grow up despite being an ageless kid thanks to Wendy, while his archenemy Captain Hook, despite being a grown adult, is the one who acts very childishly like a spoiled brat unlike Peter Pan himself.
These haters are seriously missing the point of the 1953 animated classic 🤦♂️🤦♀️🤦
@@kingandrewcecil348 I never saw Hook that way. I always thought of Hook as a symbolism of everything that Wendy feared about growing up and also a mental projection of her father issues (after all, the ending implies that Neverland was just a dream). The conflict between Peter and Hook is basically a battle between Wendy's childhood and adulthood. And with Hook defeated, Wendy is finally ready to grow up and reconciles with her father.
@@randomfools808 Exactly. In fact, it's quite common for eldest daughters to have maternal instincts.
I don't know why Disney thinks it's sexist to be a mother. Heck, Walt Disney's mother is the reason why motherhood or absence of a mother was a recurring element in his films. Because he thought a mother's love was the most precious thing in the world.
@@randomfools808 That's how the people pushing this movie see themselves. They know they are and will be miserable in the future, with little to no one to care about them. And like they say, misery loves company, and they hope this movie will inspire people to become their future company. If everyone lives like them, they can't be wrong!
The fact that the director thinks any kid would like to go to a place like this, says much about his own childhood or lack of one.
Probably born in a broken household.
@@Drixenol86 Worse, life of luxury with trust funds, never worked a day in their life so to feel they're not just a parasite on society they make a pathetic attempt at fighting for "causes". But with no understanding of real life problems, we get *this.*
@@Drixenol86i am one and i WANT to have something like Neverland, not whatever in that movie
so the comments before me is much more correct
I just knew once they made Tinkerbell black, they would take away all of her flaws and complexities as a character. She's just perfect and nice the entire time, instead of vindictive and jealous like she's supposed to be. How are people supposed to be invested in a character if she's flawless and without any kind of arc or development?
Women can't be jealous and vindictive. It's not in their nature. It's 2023
Because black woman cannot bad!!! Grr!
@@michaelcalvert6323 Yep they are prefect. No flaws exist for them.
So many women I know liked tinkerbell because shes a bit of a brat.
@@michaelcalvert6323 nah it has to do with the fact that she’s black for the movie
They gendered fairy dust just so they could defy a false gender role. Amazing
Truly revolutionary
Fairy dust is female now.
Yeah. There are male fairies in canon aswell so not sure why they did that but eh supose they didint care about anything else in the movie so why bother.
The force is female, amirite?
There are male fairies though. That's the most baffling part.
The minute that Wendy avoided walking the plank because her happy thought was growing up and dying old and alone as the best girlboss ever, my brain was screaming...
"OLD! ALONE! DONE FOR!"
lmao yesss
@@steflyria The 2003 Peter Pan is the Definitive version to me.
With A LOT of cats!
@@JKurayami The best one ever!
@@Mainer_in_Oklahoma That will eventually eat her decaying corpse
The thing is, in the original book Hook actually had a tragic backstory and an intricate connection with Peter Pan. He was a child in england and had an extremly strict upbringing. However, by character he was more of an aestetic. He was quite sensible and with high emotional intelligence being crushed by his rigorous and overbearing parents. He then fled from home to become a pirate, essentially fleeing into the opposite extreme. Later on he became the captain of the pirates and chanced upon neverland. And there he encountered Peter Pan, the very embodiment of carefree childhood, the embodiment of everything he so desperatly wished for when he was a child. However, Hook at this point is an adult and thus Peter Pan is utterly incapable of understanding Hook and just treats everything like a game. Even when he cuts off Hooks hand and feeds it to the crocodile it's just a game to him. And while this serves as the trigger, hooks obsession with Peter Pan is because of what Peter Pan represents.
Womp womp
This movie makes me admire HOOK as a masterpiece adaptation of Peter Pan. Mainly because Robin Williams is just fantastic.
While the movie Hook isn’t my favourite childhood movie I still enjoy it. And the fact that Hook and the early 2000s movie are being over shadowed by shit like this movie is just sad. 🙁
So basically it had nothing to do with how bad this movie was... Let's face it, not everything that Robin took part in was a masterpiece, but even if Hook didn't have him in it, it'd still be better than this slop.
"Disney really did lost their marbles". 😂
Bangarang
Agree!
I would give so much to just sit and listen in the writers room for these movies. They’ll say something they think is “inspiring” and “revolutionary” and I’ll be in the corner stifling laughter and eye rolling
You'd probably be in pain, actually.. I can only guess at the depths of racism and sexism that these kind of films come from. Probably sounds like an inverse Clan meeting attended by amazons. Seriously.
I wouldn't be able to resist bitch slapping everyone for every bad pitch
Remember, these morons are activists first...and then untalented, mediocre writers second...
Ive been in one. And the conservatives have to sit in silence while the libtards circle jerk amongst themselves. And the two conservative (sane) writers in the room looked at each other knowing it was going to bomb hard. And it did....it always does. Nothing woke is a winner.
Kamala
When Wendy says 'You're a pirat, it's every man for himself', she not only shows an extremely egotistical, sociopathic behaviour (come _on,_ my sister and I constantly fought, but the moment one of us was in trouble, we were as thick as thiefes), she (which means, the writers) also shows a complete unawareness of history. At least when it comes to the caribbean pirates everyone thinks of when hearing the word were actually quite a social bunch.
...and democratic.
Surprised they didn't use the line "Every woman for herself".
i would argue that it's less sociopathic and more psychopathic.
well you mustve had a really nice sister because most siblings will blame each other for anything when they get into trouble. being the oldest sibling it was definitely unfair.
No elder sibling sells out a younger to their parents, and I know being the eldest, and it was such a common knowledge that it was a trope in the 60's to the 90's in entertainment that I think the people writing know jack all about anything.
Yeah where’s the empathy, why aren’t they teaching kids to be the bigger person.
These wretched remakes really make you appreciate the original classics for their good writing, charcater development, and life wisdom. I imagine the people who write these stories are young, unmarried, not well read, not part of a community, and have little experience of life. Or they are simply paid to check boxes.
Don't know why Disney called this film "Peter Pan & Wendy" when it's blatantly obvious this film revolves around girlboss Wendy and nobody but girlboss Wendy.
its like when they changed Hansel and Gretel to Gretel and Hansel to make a fallopian tube point.
The company believes that if they were honest, no one would test out their garbage productions. Which isn't true. They COULD have named the movie Wendy and people who enjoy girlbosses would go see it. But they have to lie, all the time, about literally everything.
It’s weird, because Wendy was already the main character of the original!
They should have called the movie 'Wendy" and partnered with the fast food chain for a promotion - they could call it "Wendy's at Wendy's" and show her taking over a restaurant.
Because even if a story would primarily be about a man, it still needs to have a woman awkwardly shoved in. Like the upcoming Indiana Jones movie, with guest appearance by Indiana Jones.
Is it really so hard to highlight the good aspects of the old Tiger Lily? She was willing to die by drowning rather than betray her friends to Hook. You don't have to make her a caricature , just focus on her loyalty, friendship, and bravery. She doesn't have to be a main character to be good.
Right?!? So many of these Disney classics had amazing lessons, female empowerment & girl power… but clearly the woke mob lacks IQ because they missed all those lessons, they need media to shove it down their throats inorder for them to understand it’s there 😂😂😂
I’m a 27 year old woman and mother now, as a child my fave Disney princesses were Pocahontas, Belle, Mulan, Ariel and Jasmine, what do they all have in common? They’re strong, smart, rebellious for things that matter. Also like to point out that despite me being very fucking white (polish) I still loved princesses of a different race… I looked up to them, admired them, wanted to be them, so why is the argument that POC kids don’t have anyone to look up to? So they need to black wash every historically white character written by European authors, inorder for POC kids to feel something positive, despite there being amazing POC princesses since the 90’s what’s funny too, IMO all of the POC princesses were written has strong, smart amazing girls that kick ass, while all the white characters aside from Belle were some form of damsel in distress, useless etc… yet the woke mob didn’t notice that hey?
That requires depth and character development, something modern movies apparently hate.
Weird thing is, she didn't even speak in the original film! And she _still_ had more depth of character than this live action shitshow!
When Tiger Lily turned to Wendy and asked, "Who are you?" and Wendy replied, "Rey Skywalker" I cried.
Imagine if she said "I'm Peatress Pan." lol
It‘s pannin‘ time!
"I am Wendy Pan. Hear me screech."
@@mikerosoft1009 honestly, at this point, Peatress pan wouldn't necessarily be the worst thing, IMO.
Consider that the main tragedy of Peter is one of not growing up - so the woke feminists would be forced to confront their own unwillingness to grow up, and to what it leads (e.g., inappropriate relations with minors).
And if peatress does grow up, it would lead to the same realizations of Robin William's Peter pan: an adult has to compromise, be dutiful, be mindful of others, etc. - so if a wokeist were to realize that, it would be a first in cinema.
And if you are saying, that's just a gender bend - yes, but in that case a necessary one, to use the "self-projection" character of Peatress pan as a mirror for the self-obsessed wokeists. And that only works if the character is an actual mirror.
Of course, all would depend on who writes and directs peatress pan.
But I could actually imagine something great and relevant to our time, if it was done by the right person.
“We need to update the racist origins of Peter Pan by injecting our modern day racism, misandry, and cultural Marxism.”
*Seal clapping noises
The Lost Boys are based on the five Llewelyn Davies brothers that JM Barrie played games of make believe with, in which most of the characters of Neverland were created. The Peter Pan story is an attemtp to put to paper these fantastical games of pirates, exploring, sword fights, sailing etc. This movie takes a giant dump on the original story and the people behind it
Yeah, but remember, white people and white culture are inherently evil. So destroying anything created by it is really just morally good.
I fucking hate Hollywood. I hate them especially because my family came from Ireland, my family was brought as slaves to North America.
But I get to be lectured on how my dirt poor family, who remained dirt poor in part because of the rampant anti-Irish racism that was common in North America (legally up until the 50s/60s Irish people were legally considered 'colored'), were actually responsible for perpetuating the mistreatment of the other discriminated minorities (despite being one) and that now because of it any achievement I make, any observation I have, any opinion I form are all dismissible with "white privilege".
Disney always takes a dump on everything tbey adapt nowadays because of that "reimagine tomorrow".
I'm just waiting for a Pocahontas movie where the brave melenated people chop to pieces the horrible non melenated people who are inherently evil based on their... physical features...
Ya know, to show how unracist Disney is these days.
Wendy was super important in the original specifically _because_ she was a girly girl. She brought something into the world that no one else had, and it changed things. It seems like missing the point by a mile to make her a generic modern day strong woman trope.
The point of Wendy was not because she was a girly girl, it was because she was a mother figure. She didn't want to grow up but she had those mothering characteristics. So when she went to Neverland and mothered the lost boys, she realized growing up isn't as bad as Peter thinks it is.
@@joshuafass5841 Yes, exactly. Girly-girl stuff.
@existenceisrelative its not "girly-girl" stuff to want to be a parent. Not every girl wants to grow up and be a parent. This is why this version of lost boys also includes girls. Because not wanting to grow up is a universal dilema not exclusive to boys.
@@joshuafass5841 Ugh, jesus. Who are you impressing with this shit? You knew what i meant from the start, and you're starting an argument for no reason.
And yes, it is more in line for girls to have the nurturing maternal urge when they're little, hence baby dolls. There are boys who are similar at the same age, but they're not all that common.
It becomes more and more clear as I watch these empty Mary Sue "empowered" characters that there is nothing these writers hate more than femininity. If you're not the strongest, loudest, most ass-kickingist person in the room, you run the risk of becoming a damsel in distress, apparently; and then some mansplaining manhandling manchild man will have to man-up and save you--and no doubt expect sexual submissiveness as a reward. So the only way to be a fully empower woman is to fully suppress and denigrate your feminine nature, and be one of the boys, I guess. Best of all, don't waste time on any kind of character development or hero's journey; just be sure to be born this way--because the message you definitely want to send young women is "if you aren't already perfect at everything without even trying, you're screwed."
The 2003 adaptation is just so magical and beautiful. Honestly, this live-action was so unnecessary!
That’s what I thought too.
Very good film aside from the nudity scene.
@@Quincy_Morris I'd still choose that over girlboss crybaby Wendy
I thought Jason Isaac's Hook looked great but buckled insufficient swash. But that was about the only thing that wasn't first rate. Why can't these people learn from the successes?
I rewatched the 2003 film when this new movie was released instead.
You’re literally the first person I’ve seen bring up the part about girls being “too clever”, it’s ironically more offensive to include girls with the lost boys than to leave them out lol
"What do you like about Peter Pan"
Children "The fun story about beating up the bad guy and going on adventures!"
Philosopher "The interesting look into the idea of growing up. How Peter avoids it, and Hook is terrified of a crocodile clock, the embodiment of time coming to get you"
Historian "The interesting look into the perspective of English childhood in the early 1900s, before the world wars."
Hollywood "The money! Though I'm not much of a fan of everything else that makes it Peter Pan."
VERY good way of putting it.
Oh and get that list we have of all the minorities best get some of those in there, we do hate racism you see.
The problem Disney and Hollywood doesnt seem to understand is that audiences can now predict every single movie they put out now. I wouldnt be surprised if Ariel treats everyone like crap, sprouts nonsense only an activist would say, and she is better than everyone. Same tired trope every time.
It'll be interesting to see if you're right. Not long until we find out!
Every Disney movie is The Jungle Book these days...
At least Ariel can't talk, so she's already better than most other women.
On the bright side, we'll be able to convert their crap into something good with an AI in the future. While they'll probably be using the AIs to turn good movies into woke ones.
Well, it's a bit of a one-sided game because we don't lose or gain anything from watching it or not watching it, but Disney isn't making 'profit' regardless of whether the movie is good or bad, they only lose money when people unsubscribe from Disney+.
So, if you don't watch it but stay subscribed to Disney+, they win, if you don't have Disney+ you don't matter, and if you unsubscribe you'll probably only bump up their numbers later when you resubscribe and it's doubtful that anything they release could drive away enough people to threaten them. So, the deck is pretty heavily stacked in their favour, and as we've seen in the streaming charts, hate-watching easily gets you into a top 5 spot if you piss off enough people.
Disney: We made Tinker Bell black because we need to have a diverse cast of fairies and no one has done that yet.
Tinker Bell movies: Am I a joke to you?
No because literally. The movies were ahead of their time making a diverse group of girls, none of them adhering to any racial stereotypes, who all supported and loved each other
The past is evil. The present is evil. The future is utopian!
@@tomatosoup1304 Disney's Fairies movie series were some of the best that the company ever made. Peter Pan and *[redacted]* is worthless tripe.
Those movies were animated so they don't count modern Disney's mind.
As a “visible minority” I never felt I was excluded from enjoying the Peter Pan story. It was one of my favourite stories when i a small child.
but youre not supposed to enjoy anything youre not represented in
Its almost as if humans are,.human despite our outward.color.
@@shadf7902I have noticed this kind of post more and more, where people put extra spaces and punctuation at random. Is illiteracy just this rampant now, or has some update bug caused keys on certain phones to get all screwed up?
@@jht3fougifh393 DoEs iT r3@llY Ann0Ys yOu th@T muCH>..,?
I can’t relate to Schmee because I’m tall.
Can’t relate to hook because I have 2 hands.
Can’t relate to Peter because I don’t wear tights.
Can’t relate to Rufio because I’m not a skunk head with too much moouse.
Unless the movie is just cloned versions of me living out my exact life, I’ll never be able to draw any parallels.
My favourite part of this movie was when Disney lost millions of dollars
The part of the plot I don't understand is when the board doesn't come in and boot everyone with a C at the beginning of their job title.
They don't care. They say you were brain wash from the past films so they going to brain wash your children. This was made for them and the next generations.
Personally I think that is the best part of every Disney movie these days...red ink. Disney will soon be using ChatGPT to streamline the process of going broke.
@@jwarrior9986 ChatGPT likely has more human creative potential than Disney at this point.
@@ElasticGiraffe Not exactly a high bar 🤣
We expected a rancid woke turd, and Disney didn't disappoint as usual.
the pretty frosting could not disguise its malodorous excrescence...
"An exercise in drudgery" is not just a good review of the movie, it's a perfect summation of dealing with woke social colonization.
Oh please God, let this thing tank.
I'm not sure how it can make money when it's going straight to streaming.
It's been banished to Disney+, they know it's garbage.
Disney+, the modern equivalent of straight to video.
hindenburg style
As a women who is a huge fan of the original Disney Peter Pan I actually think Wendy had a perfect role in the original. She was motherly and helped Peter and the lost boys in an impactful way. Wendy had a great balance of being one of the main characters but also still being a stranger in Neverland. Having Peter Pan be watered down so that Wendy can be seen as a more strong character is insulting. If they explored her nurturing/family side more then I feel like it could be interesting. Like showing how much she cares for her brothers or how the lost boys feel comforted by the idea of a motherly figure and maybe want to go back home to find their parents. I don’t know, I just can’t understand why Disney is basically insultingly ruining their original library of classic films. And while I am technically part of Gen Z I think any diversity just for the sake of it can ruin things, because they focus too much on it and not the story itself. We need to tell great, rich, and thoughtful stories again, that’s the Disney I miss.
Well she wasn't a narcissistic Wendy Sue but a mature and compassionate character with genuine feelings for others, so not really female lead material for modern "Disney"
This culture that deplores "toxic masculinity" is the same culture whose actions demonstrate that they find no redeeming qualities in femininity. At least not for women. To be nurturing is to be weak; motherhood is slavery. But make women into dudes and men into little girls? Now we're talkin' their language.
Well, you see, motherly and nuturing is incredibly sexist and totally not something a strong woman would be. A strong women always takes the spotlight, is selfish and narcissistic and automatically the best at everything she tries. /s. God i hate modern disney.
@@MinqApoc big facts
Because you see motherly love is not for them a "strong female and independant woman". No, it was to always be a girl boss, always. Also, sorry for this, but im 100%not surprice that for them, this version of Disney is also a lesbian, for them is just another check on what a "strong woman" has to be, without. realising that is become insulting and sterotipical.
Please, point me other woman character with same characters that do not like other women, I can bet, are almost non existant.
Fact of the matter is, in the original, Wendy had every reason to want to leave Neverland: She had a miserable time there: The mermaids tried to drown her, Tiger Lily and the tribe treated her like trash, Wendy leaving Neverland was natural.
Not here, though. She has no reason to want to leave. Ignore the fact that the story simply made her want to leave, she's got no reason to.
In the 2003 version it also made sense for Wendy to want to leave Neverland for different reasons: She learned that despite Peter being attracted to her, he pretended he wasn't because he wants to eternally stay a boy. She's also later tempted into becoming a pirate by Hook and his crew but was later aware that would be a bad idea. Lastly, she realized that she, John, and Michael were forgetting their real parents and was afraid of the idea that they too might be forgotten later on.
It wasn't destroyed by fans, it was destroyed by Disney!
The scene where Captain Hook sad "Heil H*tler", and Wendy responded with "Trans lives matter", then took her hormone blockers...... Man that made me tear up.
It's ok big guy, a new meme will come along soon and you can go back to blending in with the window lickers in youtube comments.
@@CaptainCastle There, there, the scary words can’t hurt you. Quick to your safe space.
@@shayla106 Did you put my safety blanket in the fort?!?
😂
@@CaptainCastle Yep, along with your subscription to the Disney Channel.
Wendy's "inspirational moment" was her viewing her future flying a plane, working, and then dying alone. No husband, children or even friends... she dies alone. Says a lot that this is her motivation and aspiration of her future....
These are people who think Chelsea Handler is inspiring
pretty accurate based on my experiences with women these days. well, minus the plane part, thats dangerous work, they leave that to men.
Let's hope she lived long enough to enjoy white wine in boxes, and home-delivery cat food.
Writing clickbait for Salon, living alone in a tiny apartment surrounded by homeless people you avoid looking at, and binge-watching The Handmaid’s Tale while eating an entire 6-pack of yogurt. That’s truly living
@@TheSuperappelflap Well...the flying thing, that isn't quite far fetched to be honest (the movie was definitely shit, just getting that out of the way now)...The original Peter Pan was set around the year 1902. There were indeed documented female fighter pilots in WW1 and WW2...so Wendy would indeed have had the chance to fly around that age.
The biggest problem with Disney's ''sympathetic'' villains:
- Retroactively trying to make a villain into a misunderstood hero. ''Remember the original villains? Well, now you should feel bad for them and stupid for thinking they were evil in the first place.''
- Even when they're supposed to be likable they still are terrible. They're mean, do terrible things and we are supposed to feel bad for them because they have a sad backstory? Paraphrasing Rocket the Racoon ''Boo hoo! Your mommy is dead? It's not an excuse to be a dick!''
- Speaking of backstories! Modern Disney can't tell a subtle story. The new backstories are so over-the-top tragic and edgy that they unintentionally end up being funny. Cruella's mother being dropped kicked off a cliff by the dalmatians comes to mind.
- Also, contrived and stupid. It's really hard to feel sympathy for someone if most of their problems come from their actions and instead of acknowledging it and changing for the better they go ''You destroyed my life!'' and go on a path of revenge. Why is Cruella homeless as a child, shouldn't the police find her and put her in foster care or an orphanage? I guess ''My mother was pushed off a cliff by dogs.'' would make people think she's crazy.
Edit:
- I forgot to mention how by trying to make villains sympathetic the writers turn ''heroes'' into terrible people. Peter Pan was best friends with Captain Hook but left him alone to wander the seas looking for his mother and when he come back as an adult Peter cut off his hand. I want Hook to kill this little psycho and save poor children. It reads like those fanfictions about Hook being the lost boy. But even those fanfics are better!
- It also takes away from their threatening presence. Scar in the remake is now a pussy (wink wink) who sounds like he's about to cry when killing Mufasa and an incel who can't get over that Sarabi choose Mufasa over him.
I honestly think Game of Thrones ruined villains. You spend so much time with each character, and see the impact of what they do through other characters.
It made executives think we wanted tragic backstory for every villain in every film. It doesn’t work because we don’t have any investment in the characters in the first place.
I think Gorr from Love and Thunder is the perfect example. We see his daughter die in his arms, but we don’t know how they got into that position in the first place. Did Gorr do something that got them banished from their village? Did the rest of the village die? Is the child’s mother dead?Where are they? What kind of relationship does Gorr have with his daughter? It just asks the audience to feel sympathy for a brand new character who’s had 3 minutes of screen time.
They want brainwash kids into thinking bad people (i.e. the rich elite) when they do crimes, have sympathetic reasons/justifications for some the sickest things they do.
Tell me if Harvey Weinstein had any moral, justifiable reason for putting many actresses through a casting couch.
@@mcpudd1540 Game of Thrones fully embraced the adage that "everyone is the hero of their own story". Every character, be it a minor side-role, a major villain, or a bait-and-switch hero being offed early for shock factor, is treated as a main character and have their worldview and what brought them to the present explained to the reader. It's what makes the books great, what makes them long as hell, and what makes me dislike them, though my personal taste doesn't really matter in this case.
What happened was that the entertainment media suits took a look at that and did their usual thing; apply absurd reductionism to the property to the answer to "Why is this popular?", and then tried to imitate it to make money. GoT created its own wave of shows that were pretty much screaming "Look, we have lots of gratuitous nudity and good guys dying, are we cool yet?" at the viewer, but it also had a long-term effect on writing in entertainment, focusing more of the "villains" and portraying them as people with their own goals, motivations, and self-justifications. This gave us characters like Thanos, but in good-ol' Hollywood reductionist fashion, it also created an offshoot of misguided imitations.
When the suits looked at the Nolan Batman trilogy's success, they didn't go "Huh, so the audience likes grounded, well-realized characters and drama.", but instead they went "MOAR HYPERREALISM! MOAR DARKNESS! MOAR ANGRY SUPERHEROES CAUSING DESTRUCTION!", and we got the Snyderverse. Similarly, when Guardians of the Galaxy became an overnight success, they didn't go, "Huh, so the audience likes character-based comedy and the comradery formed between an eclectic cast of characters.", but instead went "MOAR QUIPS! MORE GARISH COLORS! MORE GIMMICKY CHARACTERS BEING DICKS TO EACH OTHER!", and we got Suicide Squad and Justice League.
Similarly, when GoT became popular, the lesson learned wasn't "If we make our villains more logical and relatable, people are more invested in the conflict with the heroes.", but "IF WE MAKE VILLAINS AND TWIST THEM INTO BEING THE GOOD GUYS, PEOPLE WILL GIVE US MONEY!".
Wait, Cruella's mother was kicked off a cliff by Dalmatians?! That honestly sounds made up, that's so bad...
@@Exeidur Yes, she was. By evil dalmatians trained by the evil fashionista villainess to attack people when she blew a whistle. It's the motivation behind Cruella's revenge plot that eventually has her take over the villainess' company. It also made the two dog-napping lackeys into her lifelong friends, race-bent the original owners of Pongo and Perdita from the original movie, and was building up 'Cruella' to be an evil second personality of the protagonist, but didn't go anywhere with it. It was... not a very good movie.
My favourite part was when Peter said “sir, we can only do store credit”, and hook replied “IT’S MA’AM!!!”
@@David-nb8kqHo- I mean, you- you- what are you- you think somebody would just make stuff up on the Internet???..??
I have never in the history of my life thought, I want a fictional character to be or look like me....not once.
@View Bot fr like i couldn't have watched ANY movie 😂
@View Bot lol bro but for real I recommend you watch Hunter X Hunter, it's one of the best fictions that's all I'm gonna say, if you like dub watch it in dub.
_"I have never in the history of my life thought, I want a fictional character to be or look like me....not once."_
Yup, that kind of thing is reserved for racist and such.
I never though I have to be personally represented in a story even though I grew up surrounded by thousands of stories and had no problem connecting with characters on basic human emotional level (they feel fear, love, hate, joy, etc. etc.) even if the characters itself were nothing like I was and were different ages, sex, ethnicity etc. Sometimes even different species.
Why should I see myself in a character? After all it's a story that happens to a character(s), I do not need stories to be self inserts. I read/watch/listen is as something that happened to others. I then have my own personal life where things happen to me.
Same way as someone tells me how they had something happen to them earlier today, why would I need to insert myself in their place when I listen their story of what happened? I cannot sympathies/emphasize with them If I do not see myself as them in the situation?
Hear! Hear!
I'll admit that I may be wanting a characters power, abilities, skill or even their state of life (like being rich) but I will never imagine them as being the same race and color as me.
Also goes to my gaming avatars like the one you see. My Skyrim character looks nothing like me.
This just reminds how much I love the 2003 Peter Pan. It's got good acting. The production design is stage like and gorgeous. The VFX and SPFX are impressive. It's faithful to the source while also adding its own little spin. It's got a good message about growing up. Peter Pan is fun but also struggles with his being fear of adulthood. Wendy is active without being in your face about it. Jason Isaacs is amazing as Hook, perfectly intimidating. Tiger Lily is not as stereotypical. And I'm native, so I know enough. 10/10, 2003 over this everyday
Amen!
Yep that is the best version of this movie for me too.
Only thing I didn't like about that was Jeremy Sumpter constantly yelling "yahooo!" and laughing all the time. That was cheesy. But I loved that they broached on the first teen romance, because they are of that age. And I think they covered the Indians quite respectfully. The little romance between Tiger Lilly and John was cute without being overdone.
Neither I, nor my children, nor my children's children will ever see this movie. The thought comforts me.
Same
Then how will you know if the critiques are accurate?
@@Cheepchipsable It's not the output itself, it is the people who create it.
@View Bot Fear not. That ship has sailed.
The 2003 version is the best imho. It put a lot of emphasis on Wendy too because she actually is the main character in a lot of ways but it still managed to keep her close to Barrie’s story. I do like strong female characters but not at the expense of making everyone else superfluous. Miyazaki does strong female heroes well, Mononoke, Nausicaa and Kiki all come to mind. And yet the strong male characters in his movies never demean the females either.
Princess Mononokee is one of my favorite movies ever. LADY EBOSHI is one of my favorite antagonists(yes, even if she was saving her people she couldn't have possibly thought killing a God was going to have good consequences, vanity and pride were always a part of her character and justified her actions to herself) in a film, and this movie gave us 2 examples of strong relatable female characters without being a narcissistic scumbag **** like woke does women.
“Man I love forced Inclusive & Diverse stories!”
Said no one ever…
There are a few screeching pink hairs that say this, but you ussually can't hear it over the projectile vomiting from everyone else in the theater.
Most of the work progressives don't even like these kind of films they just pretend to do so for ideological reasons so that someone doesn't point in their face and say "I told you so" and they admit to defeat. And their mind so long as they don't admit there's a problem no one will think that their opposition actually has a point.
It's okay guys Tinker Bell being white doesn't matter, hence why she gains powers to change her race at will or just paints herself black because thats how characters can do it, just like Kyle from South Park that one time.
Well, said the anti-White Satanic shit-swine who run Hollywood
Anyone not white and straight included = forced
Never land was a place where summer spring fall and winter happened all at the same time. Where magic was around every corner and time didn’t exist. A wonder hidden behind the stars. Watching this movie I feel like I’m at a funeral on the cliffs of England.
A funeral on the cliffs of England would be better than this movie
@@melrobertson2743 😂 😂 😂 agreed!
Indeed.. I remember it being a wonderful place… it looks like a barren sh!thole
@@samblack5313 It's so dull
Even in Once upon a time, where Neverland was permanently dark and evil place, it had more saturation and color...
Since they race swapped Peter Pan, do both Peter and Tigerlily call themselves Indian? There would be no way that Tiger lily and her tribe would know or even want to call themselves “Native American.” That’s just one of those thoughts that my mind keeps bringing up throughout this review…
I still think the whole point of Neverland was that it was the living trope of a little british boy's playtime dreamworld. If anything, the injuns there should unironically think of themselves as injuns and find the notion of constantly pow-wowwing around randomly throwing thomas-hawks and smoking peace pipes to be completely normal.
Heck, even Tiger Lily wouldn't be called Tiger Lily in any legitimate native american tribe. Tiger Lillies aren't native to the americas. They wouldn't even know what tigers are!!
I mean, by raceswapping them they accidentally turned Wendy into the racist caricature of the white savior who comes along to save the backwards savages who are being victimized by the technologically advanced whites.
Tiger Lily isn't Native American, she's native Neverlandian
@@steakdriven so she appropriated Native American culture? Interesting…
But wendy had agency in the original. She was the one that told Peter she would not go with him if her brothers did not come, she oppose to being the lost boys mother because she wanted to go home and didnt let herself be pushed around by them, when hook had captured everyone she stuck her nose up high as she walked the plank. She did things with her own free will and didnt let herself be bossed around by anyone because her motherly disposition. She was kind but knew when to be assertive.
Wendy is supposed to be this sweet, nurturing big sister that acts as the mother figure of the group. She's literally the matriarch in the story & the whole group would've been in chaos without her. In this remake, she's just as ignorant & as annoying as some of the lost boys, maybe even worse. They turned her into an annoying tomboy.
Imagine you try so hard to improve established characters but actually damage the characters instead.
An insulting caricature of a tomboy.
The worst ttpe of Tomboy: The woke girl who uses Twitter 😨
Isn't that what Disney did to every single one of their characters for the past couple of years? Remember, when TLJ came out, Rian Johnson and Kathleen Kennedy claimed that by taking Luke Skywalker, and turning him into a depressed hobo in the middle of nowhere, they made the character "better", because him realizing that trying to raise force-users will always result is some dark side users, so the most "heroic" thing he could do was to become a hermit.
They had done similar things to pretty much every single one of their iconic characters. It started with Star Wars, it's peaking with their old animated characters, and by the looks of it, the MCU is also on the chopping block already.
Hollywood cheat-sheet:
Emotions = Screeching harpy
Character = Obnoxious cunt
Empathy = Solipsism
Motives = MEMEMEMEMEMEMEME!!!
Growth = Eat cake
Message = Acidic bile that would melt even a xenemorph
The 2003 version KNEW how to make a motherly tomboy Wendy. This version didn't.
It's insulting that they didn't cast Jude Law in a dual role as Hook and Wendy's father. The whole point of it is to convey Wendy's father issues.
One of the many, many faults in this film. That would make a lot of sense, but these people don't understand what metaphors are, what's entertaining, and don't get literature
@@Arthas30000 But it's not just a metaphor and symbolism. It's also a tradition that dates back to the 1904 play. Even the original Disney classic had the same actor voice both Hook and Mr. Darling. And like I said, the reason is because Hook is meant to be Wendy's mental projection of everything she fears about adulthood, something she associates with her father because of how strict and demanding he is.
I also liked how in the animated version it reinforced the ambiguity of whether or not Neverland was just a dream.
@@vetarlittorf1807 That's a really cool detail that adds a lot to both the book and the play :D ty for sharing!
Nonono we can't have deep filmmaking in here. Take that back right now.
@@vetarlittorf1807 like the father von Alan Parrish (jumanji), he is also the hunter from the game.
Wendys roles was to be a mother figure, responsible and caring. And thats part of her taking the boys away from neverland so that they can grow up. And they legit gutted that for some cheap girl boss shit
Well, women are finally breaking free of the shackles of maternal instinct and of common decency. Universally capable, narcissistic women and woefully incompetent, emasculated men don't have enough representation in media. They only feature prominently in just about everything released.
When Captain Hook said "No man can defeat me" and Wendy said "I am no man" and she canceled him I cried 😭😭😭
See, the problem with the original is that Wendy was a true leader through wisdom, maturity, peace, patience, all-around “traditional femininity.” She showed strength beyond brute force, noise, “traditional boyish behavior.” This Wendy is a leader through Mary Sue Girl Power (TM)! I mean, literally every girl in the movie is a natural-born strong warrior who fights all their own battles and talks back to all the other characters, ‘cause she’s a strong, independent woman!
I like how these people's idea of a "strong woman" is simply acting like a sterotypical man. There's something rather ironic and almost sad about that
@@thehumblepotatoreborn9313 exactly! It's just crazy
Women are not allowed to be interanally strong anymore, they gotta, quite literally, strong by _force._ Because if you're not physically strong enough to beat up someone double your weight how could you ever hope to deserve respect?? If you want to be a mom and have a family you're just not strong enough to be alone, if you like wearing dresses you're not empowered enough to take away the pants from _the patriarchy's grasp_ 🙄
@@thehumblepotatoreborn9313 - Not even acting like an ideal or heroic man. They act like spoiled as5holes.
Well, this Wendy does act like a modern day leader by not taking responsibility for the broken mirror and instead blaming her little brothers. Of course, it seems that all the protagonists (I can’t call them heroes) are similarly awful. It’s quite pathetic that the character who comes off the least bad is the villain, Captain Hook.
When Tinkerbells glow goes out in the original and you think she's died. That's writing and knowing your audience
“Evil cannot create anything new, they can only corrupt and ruin good forces have invented or made”
― JRR Tolkien
Cool wisdom but I didn't wanna see it played out irl on my favourite works 😭😭
Hear hear!
Tolkien didn't say that though. If you're going to quote someone, do it right. "The Shadow that bred them can only mock, it cannot make: not real things of its own. I don't think it gave life to the orcs, it only ruined them and twisted them."
Didn't sauron create the ring wich was new though?
@@stormelemental13damn bro, you that lonely?
Just watch Hook. I showed my kids it recently and it is such an absokutely brilliant movie I couldn't believe it. Hadn't seen it since I was a kid myself.
All this film does to me is emphasises how much more i have to laud and recommend Hook over anything like this. If you want to see a film that takes the original source material and develops it into such an enjoyable continuation to the original story, with wonderful acting,, fabulous casting and wonderful special effects as well as a film for all ages then look no further than a film that came out in 91. Just look how we have lost the magic of good film making.
He's so quick, he's fast asleep!
Honestly one of my favourite movies.
Agreed. Plus the original Peter Pan. You know, the unrepeatable classic that everyone tries to repeat? 🤦🏻♂️😂
Hook is such a great movie.
@@scubasteve2189 let's not forget this is already Disney's second or third attempt at a live action Peter Pan. The stuff I'm thinking of wasn't all that well received and it was pointed out back then that the animated film didn't need a live action remake/adaptation.
Despite it failing to find an audience in 2003, we should be grateful that PJ Hogan was able to get as close an adaption of JM Barrie's "Peter Pan" to the big screen that has ever been done. Thankfully, he didn't have to checkoff boxes to appease diversity obsessed bean-counters or turn Wendy or Tiger Lilly into romance-less girlbosses. He just retold Barrie's classic Edwardian story as faithfully as he could with a few modern updates that actually benefitted the story. The '03 "Peter Pan" looks better and better with every passing year, but especially now so in comparison to this wokeified piece of 2020's Disney dreck.
I grew up with the '03 Peter Pan, so I already have a lot of nostalgia for it. Jeremy Sumpter was also perfect casting as Peter, especially considering he did the majority of the stunts in the film himself. Jason Isaacs also killed it as Hook - Hell, everyone in the film was fantastic! Not to mention that score ... 😭👌🏾
Yeah although I didn’t know that it didn’t do well I loved it more than this “Peter Pan” movie if you can call it that
Man, Jason Isaacs was so good. It was my favorite performance of his... Until I saw The Death of Stalin.
I love this movie so much! The music, the effects, Jeremy Sumpter was my OG celebrity crush 😂❤
@@philliptivis3082 Man absolutely killed it as Zhukov
Ah, I remember being a little girl in the late 90's and early 00's, having our Peter Pan vhs tape on constant repeat in my house. What I don't remember is being sad that there were no "lost girls" I didn't need it in the 1990s, kids didn't need it in the 1950s when the film first came out, kids didn't need it 1904 when the play first premiered, and kids don't need it now. Wendy and Tinkerbell were enough.
"Why aren't there any Lost Girls?"
"Honey, girls are too sensible to get Lost. They grow up when they are supposed to."
But... Kids ARE being TAUGHT to need it... being TOLD that they need it... and it isn't a coincidence.
Director: Where is the light coming from?
Any random 8 year old: All over her body bc she's magic.
Haha!
She's covered in pixie dust, whatever.
I live in the town where Peter Pan was originally written and I must say Disney have hit the gold record for missing the point so hard that it is now in deep space.
yep, its close to zeta reticulae now. a little further, and we will be entering klingon territory
@@kimrasmussen7188 The edge of the Milky Way, dude. Crazy far.
Disparu: ...because Wendy is a complete cow.
TH-cam: **inserts add for chocolate milk**
I am not kidding. That is a thing that happened while watching this video.
Moooo
Algorithm
😂😂😂😂😂
The worst part of the whole thing was just how Wendy basically thought Peter was problematic and hated him from the start. There were no fun antics or adventures in Neverland prior to the "conflict."
It's like they turned Wendy into Tinker Bell and Tinker Bell into Wendy. It's the Home Alone 4 syndrome, where they brought back Marv but he looked like Harry instead of the original Marv!
This is because the Wendy’s unreciprocated romantic feelings toward Peter were missing. It’s supposed to show that Wendy, as a girl, is a little more mature and Peter isn’t able to meet at her level.
Removing the romance took away much of Wendy’s character arc, and the conflict between her and Tink and her and Tiger Lily.
There’s no depth or value left in the story and we ultimately don’t learn anything about the world or ourselves.
Time to strike the egos of these pseudo writers who think they can do better than the original creators.
They know they can't because they don't have their own IP
@@tbc1880 yeah, they have some sort of resentment towards this creators.
Unfortunately they're not pseudo writers xD they're legitimate professionals that just can't write
@@antonioyeats2149 if they can’t write that means they just have the title.
@@alejandroangel998 lol pro creatives have a job, not a super power. A person who does a job poorly and keeps their job is still a legitimate pro.
What I find unfortunate isn't that they keep their jobs because shitty writers have always and will always find a platform to pedal pulp fiction xD what I find unfortunate is that the REASON they're being employed currently.
The whole point of Wendy was to play a motherly role to the Lost Boys. She was supposed to show the civilizing nature of family, especially mothers. But now, no. Childish savagery is good now, becuase Girl Boss gotta Girl Boss.
I hate Disney.
How though? Wendy had the lost boy remembering about their mothers, she sung them a lullaby, she brought them out of Neverland. How is "savagery" good?
@@joshuafass5841 because that theme was poorly executed…see in the OG Story…She has been a “constant” mother figure, someone who is mature, responsible and caring to everyone around her, in this case The Lost Boys.The theme of growing up is best represented by her. The medium was the story and she was the figure(the value).
The new Wendy was a medium about growing up…but she is not the figure. Nowhere was she anywhere a radiant figure that inspired anyone to step up and face reality. The medium became the means, this is provided by literally sprinkling all of it through thematics…like how Hook now became a push for the theme of Missing their parents. (If that explanation about hook missing his parent come out of nowhere…like it was just fitted in…its because that was literally the movie.)
@Sean Acuesta this wendy is just like one of the lost boys, she didnt want to grow up. We wanted to continue to play with her brothers. Thats why Peter choose to take her to never land, to be one of the lost boys. But she had those motherly traits as showed when singing to the lost boys.
@@joshuafass5841 Precisely…She was never a mother figure…portrayed at the beginning… the thing is like you said she is now one of the lost boys since the start…in the OG and some following iteration…she never was “fully”identifying like anyone in the lost boys, sure she had fun…but at the end of the day she is still the caring figure…
In this new iteration…she was this all powerful and in particular moments a caring figure…the whole sympathy of love and family…was not hers…and for some reason it belonged to hook.
So literally instead of Wendy being the main reason for everyone choosing to grow-up, through her actions, Behavior, and consistency. She was just a medium that they needed to grow up. And the message of caring and maturity was sprinkled through out…in essence making Wendy useless in the story.
I love how girlboss Wendy was in front of Peter in their flight to Neverland and leading him to a place she's never been before.
Ideology > making sense.
They're always trying to get an A+ on the Bechdel Test. Can't have a female character learn anything from a male character, or follow one's lead. Also watch for the girlbosses to tell each other they're so wonderful and perfect, another requirement.
@@NefariousKoel "You're a goddess and should never change for any reason. Just between us girl bosses, boys are stupid. Let's make out."
@@NefariousKoel a feminists wet dream.
@@ElasticGiraffe if they actually made out and were 18+ the movie would probably sell more tickets
Well put. As a woman who grew up with peter pan and Cinderella and all the other fairy tales and was completely unrepresented and literally lived through movies constantly calling me a terrorist I still adored the fairy tales as they were and even the stories of peter pan and the lost boys. I loved hook...I watched that movie sooo much through my childhood and never had a problem with it. It was a great story and had a decent moral to it. I think people today forget that movies back in the day actually had a moral to the tale.
And that is what the suits in Hollywood cannot understand ... because They have no morals!
Yes and also why do these new adaptions act like women in the past were never strong or competent in their own rights? That we have to change them completly so that we can portray them. It's so insulting to both women back in the day and to women today.
The mermaid scene was integral not just showcase the dangers of the island, but also showcase european folk tales and creatures and how their childlike appearance hides a sinister nature. Also childhood innocence, especially with the concept of death.
I just re-watched that scene from the original and the way at the end one of the mermaids just casually goes.
"Yeah we were only trying to drown her." Like as a kid you miss that but as an adult you're like HOLD UP what she say?
@@MajorSmurf that sentence alone solidifies the nature of fairies in old folklore. They don't die so they don't know what death is. They always play extreme games because to them, death is just a thing they have. They think death is some kind of sleep thing that you do when you get hurt or stabbed real hard. It's the child's worldview given that the concept of death is an adult thing. Every child thinks that they are gonna be young forever, that their bones and flesh will forever grow back. If it doesn't, then science and technology will grow it back. But then they mature and grow old, knowing that father time is a stern man with exact due dates. It's that we have to make due with the time we have, and be the best we can be.
@@throwdown1776 Yep it's fantastic how much depth a simple scene like that has meanwhile that kind of depth in a modern Hollywood would be done through a text dump or speech from a character. Hollywood really struggles to realise that their writers aren't as good as they think are. If they were where's their best selling book or original work?
@@MajorSmurf I remember it I got in trouble in kindergarten because I said that thinking it was ok.
@@MajorSmurf Hah! I know, right? Actually a brilliant little line there. Just says it so whimsically.
"She is in charge for no reason. She hasnt done anything to deserve it, it just kinda happened"
That sums up feminism quite well.
Yep
that sums up females.
@@SiccDeville Feminism =/= "females". There are plenty of actually decent people out there of both genders, it's just that feminists have poisined the well and made everything about them and their toxic narcissism.
it's wokeism, not feminism. You can write a good character based on proper feminist values without it being this bloody garbage.
The first wok femnists first got up the ladder by sucking the johns and sugar dads, then the rest got in through those wok femnsts friends.
I’m an elderly adult who was taught the “good vs. evil” life lesson from my parents and even got reinforced by movies of the era. Now it appears that GOOD kinda exists but needs to be tweaked and Evil, apparently, doesn’t exist and is just a misunderstanding… lost the compass.
that is a big part of the message disney is pushing. in most of their recent works, the good guys do morally abject things and the bad guys are better people than they are, and often arent even portrayed as 'bad', they just get bullied by the 'good' guys and lose at the end of the movie.
This is a direct result of society losing religion. This will get worse, but it is to be expected because corporations cannot make as much money if they have to adhere to ethics and so the abolishing of ethics will happen so profits can rise.
That's a dangerous mentality to have for sure. Good and Evil will always be a thing, no matter how much people try to drown the truth with "moral relativism".
misunderstandings are indeed possible, but there are certain lines that one shouldn't cross no matter how well intended they might be.
can't believe they turned my girl wendy, one of the most loving, caring, smart and mature young ladies in movie and literature, into a jerk. og Wendy would NEVER incriminate her brothers for something she has done; in fact, og Wendy would take the guilt for something they've done to protect them without a second thought. she is a second mother to them, she would die for those boys
I don’t watch movies anymore, I watch reviews!
Penty of older films to watch :) hope Disney looses it's ass on this one.
When Wendy stabbed Hook in the face and yelled, "I am no boy!" after he said no mere boy could kill him shook me to my very core. Such brave filmmaking.
does the crocodile still get his pocket watch or does she steal that too?
@@jonnyq680 The crocodile does but it was recasted as a plus sized black woman from new orleans
Wow, such an original comment.
You a fucking clown most likely a pillow Biter
I loved the part where Tiger Lily got into the DeLorean and said, "Hey, Wendy, we better back up. We don't have enough boys to be called the Lost Boys."
And Wendy said, "Boys? Where we're going, we don't need... boys."
The original cartoon was my favorite Disney cartoon. Hook was also great. I won't watch this. So sad.
Have you ever played Kingdom Hearts?
the 2003 movie was closer to the original imo.... hooks a classic
@@MegaSpideyman amazing game
This is deconstructionism at it's finest. People who don't know what made the original property successful thinking that if they come in and "subvert" the tropes, and remove "problematic" content, that it will automatically be better.... even though that has never made anything better. It's almost like making something modern causes it to lose something timeless.
Remember that the original religion of Rome was based on Greek gods with a Latin renaming of these same gods. Only later on when Jesus Christ was crucified, his teachings would evolve centuries into the religious form of Christianity and it took until Constantine the Great to evolve times religion from the latinized Greek gods to the cross. ✝️. So wokeism in western culture is on par with Christianity dominating Rome
Honestly, if you want a good live-action Peter Pan, just watch the 2003 version. It is such a delightful movie, while also being a very well told story.
With excellent actors! Jason Issacs revelled almost as much being Hook as he did being Lucious Malfoy!
I miss the days when creating cinema was a passion project by people who shared similar life experiences and views, not just a means of keeping people employed who's dislike of their coworkers is only surpassed by their dislike of the very thing they're making
*surpassed by their absolute contempt for their customers
With movies like this, people are actually looking forward to a writers' strike in Hollywood.
AI writing would do way better at this point
@@13376UNN3R i'd rather watch an AI script of Shrek and Ryan Gosling than Disney's crap.
@@13376UNN3R bruh this stuff looks like they did use AI but that AI was trained on Twitter activist posts
@@leilanidale lool
Seeing the how 'Wendy blames her damage on her younger brothers' just keeps that meme alive about Woman dodging responsibility like a Super-Saiyan.
*more like ultra instinct not even thinking about it
@PhantomGline Absolutely
They don't even address it at the end where she apologizes. They just skip right over it.
As a young boy I felt so excluded from one of my most beloved animated films, The Lion King, being that I am not a big cat out in the Savannah
You know; if you want a good live action Peter Pan movie, you have the one from 2003.
I'm glad they didn't ruin the mermaid scene. That was always my favorite part. I guess ruining mermaids is still... on it's way 😒
I think the reason they couldn’t get this movie to work is we don’t have any hope for the future. The message of Peter Pan is that you need to grow up and move on in order to experience greater things. Millennials and the generations after don’t have that kind of hope anymore. We often long for the “good old days” and get stuck on nostalgia instead of thinking of what we can do now. In a way, we’re all Peter Pan wanting to stay in Neverland forever.
Wendy: says cringe line
Me, who has heard cringe lines for 5 straight years now: “I’m dead inside.”