Santa Fe, NM Destination Wedding | Shot on Fujifilm XH2S
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024
- My Gear for weddings:
Fujifilm XH2S - amzn.to/3bwnJGK
Fujifilm XT4 - amzn.to/3zS7MEv
DJI RS3 Pro - amzn.to/3zQdLt7
Fringer EF-FX PRO II - amzn.to/3BBVlxJ
Viltrox EF-FX2 Auto Focus 0.71x Reducer - amzn.to/3Skojbm
Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 Art - amzn.to/3SlijPx
Tamron SP 24-70mm F/2.8 - amzn.to/3oUS84B
Tamron SP 70-200mm F/2.8 - amzn.to/3PSqt01
Fuji XH2S cameras handheld and on gimbal
Contax Zeiss 50mm 1.4
Contax Zeiss 85mm 1.4
Tamron 24-70mm 2.8 + Metabones Speedbooster
Tamron 70-200mm 2.8 + Metabones Speedbooster
Sigma 18-35 1.8 + Fringer Pro II
Affiliate Links:
Some of the links in my video descriptions are affiliate links, which means, at no extra cost to you, I will make a small commission if you click them and make a purchase.
Musicbed SyncID
MB01B3F4UJ21FYP
Awesome!
Awesome job!!
I really like the dialogues, is soo clean!
You put lavs on the couple and guests, or just use the shotgun mic?
I’m really impressed!!
I never use any speed booster, you can really I the autofocus or just used in manual?
Lavs for bride and groom. Mixer board audio for toasts!
Speedbooster will be all MF. Not a biggie though I prefer to pull my own focus
@@itsaaronmiller ty.
I like use manual focus too, but not on autofocus lens 😅
@@IgnisProjetos that’s fair. I don’t use any Fuji glass for this reason haha. Mostly manual or older EF glass. Usually a better linear response
There’s some magic here
That Fuji magic ⚡️
Great video, conversations are super clean, have you used adobe podcast?
Thank you! I used it for the rehearsal dinner. The toasts were a bit unexpected and so that audio was pulled off the bride and groom mics and thrown into adobe podcast. Really helped a ton
How beautiful! Can you briefly share the video settings (e.g. F-log2 or Film-Sim) and how you graded on the post?
Thank you! I shot this all in standard F-log. Using Dehancer pro in post with Davinci Resolve
@@itsaaronmiller Thank you for the reply. Wow, F-log. In what kind of circumstance do you prefer F-log over F-log2, or do you always use it?
@@skydoggang I prefer F-log over F-log2 right now purely because I know how to use it and haven’t had time to learn Flog-2 for a full wedding. However I’ve used F-log 2 for some other work and it’s nice. I don’t love that I have to denoise it but it cleans up well. Just an extra step and process. Also on weddings I don’t like to use VND filters so having the higher base ISO means I would need to use them more often