Dyson Gen5 Detect vs Miele Triflex HX2, ( Not Even Close)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 80

  • @seansteel3326
    @seansteel3326 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I have the gen 5 and it is just really good ! You may look at a carpet and think its clean, but running the dyson over it and you can see the amount of dust and hair it collects in its see through bin. Also, the sideway laser light on the dyson shows dirt so much better than just a white LED headlight which other vacuums seem to have. I was so impressed with my gen 5 that I have become a dyson fanboy. Bought their hairstyler airwrap for my wife and she loves it. Bought the airfilter hot cool link and I love that.
    Get dyson for the technology and real cleaning, get the Miele if you generally have a clean house but want to flex your wealth to people. It's a brand name, that's all, nothing special with the Miele.

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Definitely. Plus the Gen5 is more expensive so you can flex even more😅

    • @miroslavilic5336
      @miroslavilic5336 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Miele is now 520€ and Dyson Gen5 for 750€; love the flexing I will be doing to people

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's still $929 in the US for this model.

  • @Scorpion-king-c8q
    @Scorpion-king-c8q 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I have hx1 for almost three years, it has been used regularly on max power, 20 minutes it last and it is more than enough for my usage. I have Miele c3 for proper full use weekly, but hx1 for quick use on stairs, car cleaning and in tight spaces. To be honest it is good enough for small apartment usage, filtration system on all stick vacuum are not the best. I have been using Miele vacuum for 20 plus years now had the old canister without the power brush which I upgraded to c3 due to lot of think carpet in new home,
    I have not noticed much dust coming out of hx1 model so far almost three years of usage. We have cat in house so hx1 is used quite a bit during week.
    Miele vacuum last very long time at same performance level. I can’t say that for any Dyson vaccum.

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dysons last just fine if you take care of them. Most of mine are between 3 and 12 years old.

  • @ryr635
    @ryr635 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    First I wanted a Dyson, then decided on the Miele, now watching this I'm switched back on the Dyson. I know I'm not loyal but I'm so confused, until you came along and showed me the light.

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ryr635 the Miele has a cool design. But the machine needs a lot more suction and a much better filter design

    • @ElSarcastro
      @ElSarcastro 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Being loyal to a corporation sounds like a great way to have a very bad time.

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Depends

  • @Cleaning_Hero
    @Cleaning_Hero หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have both. Single cyclonic designs require much more frequent filter cleaning. After every use, practically. Although I’m not a fan of how flimsy the Dyson feels, I am impressed with how clean the exhaust filter stays. I’m also impressed with how well it cleans the carpet; for a stick that is.

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Cleaning_Hero the dyson is pretty well built. Mine has suffered some falls and heavy use and is still working great

    • @Cleaning_Hero
      @Cleaning_Hero วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@VacMaster1991well, to me, like everything, its a scale. They’re not terrible on build quality, but they could do better.

  • @geokosp7954
    @geokosp7954 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I like the Dyson but I hate it’s high pitch sound also that the “turbine” design Wich is gold or purple or differs on every model it’s just decorative if you pull it apart it’s nothing it’s just a design selling trick,so I don’ like been fulled (not to that extent at least )and at that price point ,I ve noticed that the spinning brush throws around small pieces.so all those are negatives Dyson but the Miele it has the can at a spot that makes cleaning under furniture difficult if not impossible.
    PS your video was spot on thanks

    • @ДокторЛивси-г9и
      @ДокторЛивси-г9и หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you didn’t know, but Miele’s container can be installed both at the bottom and at the top

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not sure what you mean

    • @ДокторЛивси-г9и
      @ДокторЛивси-г9и หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@VacMaster1991 Sorry, the answer was not for you) .

    • @geokosp7954
      @geokosp7954 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ДокторЛивси-г9иif that’s the case ..Miele for me is better..thanx for the info

  • @Italianv74
    @Italianv74 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thank you. Great video as always. Miele corded vacuums are phenomenal. The Triflex HX2 cordless model needs to be updated.

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There canister machines are pretty good. This one. Not so much

  • @MusicClements78
    @MusicClements78 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    To me it is supposed to find large amount of dust and debrees on filtering systems, otherwise it means it did not work properly

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MusicClements78 good vacuums use cyclones to capture the majority of dust before it reaches the filter. That keeps it running well longer. The Miele has no separation system so the filter clogs too easily

    • @PurushNahiMahaPurush
      @PurushNahiMahaPurush 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Fine dust particles are not supposed to reach your filter. The filter is supposed to be the last line of defence. If you have too much dust on your filter, it means the cyclones and the meshed shrouds in the bin aren't working as they are supposed to. A choked up filter will significantly reduce suction and airflow.

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Correct.

  • @thecrunchyvacuumasmr
    @thecrunchyvacuumasmr 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Love these comparisons!

  • @lynnbartlett4185
    @lynnbartlett4185 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This was really useful. Thank you

  • @gabrielvasquez9515
    @gabrielvasquez9515 5 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I think Miele has the best corded vacuum. But Dyson undoubtedly remains the king of cordless vacuum.

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  16 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      Indeed

  • @milanzerewan7332
    @milanzerewan7332 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Your the best vacuum reviewer out there!

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks. No sponsors here!

  • @siiNke
    @siiNke 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I need one for hotel cleaning and working every day for 2 hours. Which would last more?

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The dyson, due to its substantially better cyclone system. But for a business, get a commercial vacuum.

    • @Snowman1318
      @Snowman1318 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@VacMaster1991Miele for hotel use

  • @rawsonreich
    @rawsonreich 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Awesome comparison

  • @andyding9079
    @andyding9079 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice comparison. What do you think about shark cordless pet stratos ?

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@andyding9079 it's ok. But the automatic floor adjustment slows the brush down too much and makes it stall.

  • @xfghffhfg
    @xfghffhfg หลายเดือนก่อน

    Maybe i'm mistaken but it seems you are using the carpet care tool of the miele to clean a hard floor. If i'm not mistaken, you need to change to a soft roller for a hard floor. Also, you didn't mentioned, miele has a different head for animal hairs.
    BTW, maybe you did that but again you didn't mention you need to twist the filter top cap (miele recommend 10 times) to clean it up.

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Miele didn't come with a soft roller

  • @greenblack6552
    @greenblack6552 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The hair part is a deal breaker for me. I have long hair and I have two cats.

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@greenblack6552 i have three cats and a mum with long hair. The Miele struggles with hair a lot. I definitely recommend the Dyson

  • @jbt8922
    @jbt8922 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I like the Miele setup compared to Dyson. It is more comfortable to use.

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jbt8922 it is comfortable. But the performance issues make it hard to recommend

    • @Tar0245
      @Tar0245 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Then use a smaller Dyson that's not as heavy.

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Tar0245 like the v12 or v10. They are pretty lightweight.

  • @Darijo.m
    @Darijo.m 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    You seriously need to get a Henry 😁

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They are basically glorified shop vacs. Plus they are very expensive in the US.

    • @vacuumcleanercollectorfixe1499
      @vacuumcleanercollectorfixe1499 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@VacMaster1991
      I wouldn’t say they’re glorified shop vacs. I’d say they’re much better than Shop Vacs

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      To me, They have a very similar design to a shop vac. I would pay maybe $100 for one. But they are $400+ in the US. If someone could prove to me they are better than a $80 craftsman or ridgid, then I may be interested. But for now I would never buy one.

    • @mach1nefan
      @mach1nefan 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@VacMaster1991 they’re very different to shop vacs (far smaller, better filtration, different tools, surprisingly great quality), but I can get why you wouldn’t want to blow so much on one!

    • @jbt8922
      @jbt8922 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@VacMaster1991kenmore, vacmaster and power flite make a Henry knock cost between 80-160 bucks. I have the vacmaster one the only complaint I have is the hose.

  • @匿名的-1
    @匿名的-1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If I remember right, there should be a secondary lifetime filter in the Miele, but it's quite bad how you can't really remove it. I desperately wanna like the Miele, but despite it being german made and stuff, I can't imagine it having a longer lifespan than a Dyson, maybe even worse because of the despicable filter design.

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I wanted to like it too. But the filters and brush roll make it hard to recommend.

  • @joshshaw6505
    @joshshaw6505 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you do a comparison on this Miele vs the Dyson v15 does this this Miele have more suction than the v15

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don't have the Miele anymore

  • @benscott3603
    @benscott3603 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dude, don’t let your canister get past the fill line on the Dyson. It would have performed even better if you hadn’t had it so full

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @benscott3603 yes it would

  • @babyshadowlady
    @babyshadowlady 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is it heavy ? Thinking of buying v12 or gen 5

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The gen5 is pretty heavy. The v15 is a good in-between for weight and power

  • @ocke94
    @ocke94 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Miele is terrible, especially in relation the the price. It is heavy, has problems as soon as its not just some easy dust and worst of all it scratches wooden floors if there is the tiniest bits of gravel. We returned ours within two weeks, after a few aweful scratches. Do. Not. Buy.
    I was expecting it to live up to the Miele name and standard. It didnt.

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Sadly your absolutely right

  • @Tar0245
    @Tar0245 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for making this video! I've seen stuff going around online with nonsensors trying to say that the Miele is better than Dyson. Um, no. LOL. The Miele probably would have been good 20 years ago. You really can't beat a Dyson. Even if something is equivalent or better than Dyson in one area the Dyson will always beat it out in multiple other areas.

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Tar0245 the nonsenseors are probably sponsored by Miele. I paid for both of these. And have no affiliation with either brand. A Bissell is better than this miele. The Triflex is one of the most disappointing vacuums I have reviewed. It needs a full redesign to be competitive.

    • @charlesrodriguez7984
      @charlesrodriguez7984 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@VacMaster1991I mean Sebo would be better than Miele because their vacuums seem to have better filtration and carpet performance. But Miele is absolutely a joke.

  • @charlesrodriguez7984
    @charlesrodriguez7984 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Loll. Completely disproves people like performance reviews and similar ones. Miele is good but not better than Dyson. This cordless is pathetic.

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I was really shocked it didn't perform better. Especially for $930.

    • @mainsource8030
      @mainsource8030 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      performance reviews is so disingenuous he lies to people alm ost daily and they call him out on it in his comment section. i blocked him on reddit , hes so insufferable

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yep. He's probably the worst vacuum reviewer out there. I don't understand why people watch him considering Vacuum Wars, Ibaisaic, Parwaz, and of course, me! I haven't seen a video from him that doesn't have some type of bs in it.

    • @mainsource8030
      @mainsource8030 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@VacMaster1991 agreed, you always seem fair and dont automatically trash a vacuum just for being cordless. on his channel god forbid he reviews a dyson, where he has a meltdown practically and doesnt even try to hide his bias.

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I know, right? It's so obvious he lies it now even funny. We'll maybe😁

  • @Olliebobalong
    @Olliebobalong 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The reviews on the Miele are dismal. They’ve replaced it already with a Chinese made model. No im not joking. Dyson are at least designed and developed in the UK, made in Malaysia at their own facilities. Miele get theirs made by a 3rd party in China.

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Olliebobalong that's actually pretty shocking. The 2 and 3 star reviews day a lot

    • @aidan9958
      @aidan9958 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I’ve had Miele corded machines but never a cordless. A friend bought a Miele HX2 and praised it a lot. I tried it, it’s worse than the Samsung cordless that my work has in the back for spills.
      Gen5 all the way!

    • @VacMaster1991
      @VacMaster1991  16 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      Yes indeed