WAY TOO EASY🔥🌳 Red/Green Aggro | WOE Standard [MTG Arena]

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 119

  • @thunderwashington255
    @thunderwashington255 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    It's an amazing thing to see a control player's brain work with an aggro deck

  • @ClavisRa
    @ClavisRa ปีที่แล้ว +18

    The best card to pair with Thrillseeker is Questing Beastcaller since you can sack it for the big damage backup ability, then put the counters on the Thrillseeker and nearly double the burn with another sack. You can easily burn out an opponent with 17 damage or so out of nowhere. Thrillseeker is also bonkers with Cacophony Scamp.

  • @AaronRotenberg
    @AaronRotenberg ปีที่แล้ว +8

    48:58 I legitimately forgot that Rona could transform. I only ever see people use it as a Merfolk Looter that can untap.

  • @doublethomas8415
    @doublethomas8415 ปีที่แล้ว +124

    Spell Pierce has gotten much better with all of these adventure creatures having instant/sorcery on them and denying the creature is a a 2 for 1.

    • @La_Lente_Oscura
      @La_Lente_Oscura ปีที่แล้ว +3

      1.5 x 1. Adventure are still 1 card even if they have inherent extra value.

    • @Lordidude
      @Lordidude ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@La_Lente_Oscura can you rephrase that? I'm not understanding why it's 1,5

    • @hp5310
      @hp5310 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@LordidudeIt's similar to how a 1/1 token is equal to half of one card in value. The adventure is normally over cost by one mana in comparison to it's effect normally on a card. Take the new whale for example. It can bounce a creature for two mana. Normally that effect cost one. Hopefully this helped.

    • @cp7551
      @cp7551 ปีที่แล้ว

      Its not a 2 for 1 an adventure card has just some extra value printed on it so you can say its like 1 an a half card. (Same as scry one is equal to drawing half a card. Put a Land bottom and you have skipped a dead draw but did not draw a card)

    • @hp5310
      @hp5310 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@cp7551Much better explanation than mine lol

  • @qwormuli77
    @qwormuli77 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    8:50 You have Halana&Alena with rage for a total of 5 power, Migloz with H&A 5 power boost for a total 9 of power and Ruby with her "4 power or more +2/+2" boost for a total of 6 power. That's exactly 20, unless I missed something. Did you miss that p/t boost from Ruby? I know I did it initially.
    Also, I think it's the blue players being blue and saying that you're a terrible player _for_ playing aggro, not that you're terrible _at_ playing aggro, lol.
    Edit: Oh, you caught it ten seconds afterwards. My bad.

  • @cyberstudios7983
    @cyberstudios7983 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    "were gonna be like butter were so on that roll." was casually one of the hardest lets get this shit sayings I've heard

  • @rockyblue92
    @rockyblue92 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Love the subtle Tenacious D reference.

  • @tylerturner4163
    @tylerturner4163 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I just realized by watching this video that Ruby is a two CMC mana creature with haste and i dont know how that slipped under my radar during spoilers.

  • @andreterblanche1807
    @andreterblanche1807 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Man, I love this set.

  • @teusz16
    @teusz16 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    8:45 not sure how you were counting here - you had perfect lethal. Pump Halana and Alena to 5, Migloz gets haste and 5 counters so it’s attacking for 9, and Ruby gets +2/+2 from her ability so you attack for 5 + 9 + 6 = 20 exactly
    Edit: you saw the +2/+2 from Ruby later but not sure how you got to 19 before that haha

  • @grumpyzebra4450
    @grumpyzebra4450 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Reminds me of that dwarf rune deck from before last rotation. "Suddenly dead" aggro gotta be one of my favorite genders

  • @XaeroGames
    @XaeroGames ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Gonna try it out. seems nuts!

  • @cmelch
    @cmelch ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Questing Druid seemed to overperform. I think people were unnecessarily low on the card. An already decent creature attached to a draw spell we already know is good seems incredibly flexible. An aggro card and a prowess card that provide card advantage in decks that like it is underrated.

    • @qwerte6948
      @qwerte6948 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      its better than a prowess

    • @jojodelacroix
      @jojodelacroix ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I saw nothing but positivity for the card in my circles so ig it depends where you were looking.

    • @cmelch
      @cmelch ปีที่แล้ว

      @@qwerte6948 It is. I was referring to it as a card that would see play in a prowess style of deck with a bunch of spells.

    • @klarthkoken1925
      @klarthkoken1925 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I haven't been following the previews, so this is the first I've seen of it, but improving an already played card *then stapling a creature to the back* seems busted to me.

    • @busTedOaS
      @busTedOaS ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@klarthkoken1925 its not a strict upgrade on reckless impulse though. only until next end step is quite a bit worse. instant Speed is nice though.

  • @nickniehaus1763
    @nickniehaus1763 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jesus Christ the pass was excruciating 13:20

  • @pietapizza1
    @pietapizza1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love these decks infinitely more than control removal piles

  • @ShiivaWilding
    @ShiivaWilding ปีที่แล้ว

    Final game, had the opponent not had interaction, the thrillseeker alone was lethal. When CGB played the thrillseeker, the counters go on Raiju pumping it up to a 5/5, then you swing with the remaining three creatures, pumping Raiju to a 6/6. The other creatures are modified dealing two from the Raiju's ability, then you sacrifice the Raiju with the last remaining mana to deal six and lethal!

  • @BoxBoy_99
    @BoxBoy_99 ปีที่แล้ว

    8:52 Ruby gets +2/+2 on attack u had exact lethal lo!

  • @scaevola
    @scaevola ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the song playing at around 30:05? It’s very nice and Id like to listen to it :)

  • @MetalHev
    @MetalHev ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've been playing a temur version of something similar to mythic since a few months ago. Its kinda gross when your supposedly aggro deck has to discard to hand size on turn 5, while the control deck blows up literally everything you play.

  • @josephiroth89
    @josephiroth89 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That second game... winning on the draw against mono-red on turn 4.

  • @lordless12
    @lordless12 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Love the counter, it's so small and meaningless but makes a difference

    • @haoNoQ
      @haoNoQ ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It causes opponents to take 1 extra damage from Thundering Raiju because the counter makes CGB a modified creature.

  • @shua1844
    @shua1844 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ruby is such an awesome card, thanks for the deck!

  • @odststalker5117
    @odststalker5117 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I suppose it is nice to see a viable Gruul deck again

  • @Pathzuzu
    @Pathzuzu ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh Sensei…you taught this aggro boi how to play control. How I wish I could teach you the aggro way.

  • @someaussiebloke4487
    @someaussiebloke4487 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Here at the start
    Lez go!

  • @nickniehaus1763
    @nickniehaus1763 ปีที่แล้ว

    6:45 “…this is what Protoss does…”

  • @Hexrampant
    @Hexrampant ปีที่แล้ว

    at 29:00 wouldn't it be smarter to wait for the opponent to attack then blow up the adversary?

    • @interestedviewer2097
      @interestedviewer2097 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Or let opp pay, put the trigger on the stack, then kill it? I'm almost certain you get a chance to interact with the adversaries

    • @lucidiously
      @lucidiously ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Adversary would've been a 4/2.

    • @Hexrampant
      @Hexrampant ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @lucid6535 your right about that he could not wait till attack but he could wait for the opp to pay and the trigger on the stack so opp wastes the extra mana

    • @busTedOaS
      @busTedOaS ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@Hexrampantyou don't get to react after opponent pays the mana. next time you get priority it is a 4/2.

    • @Duall8
      @Duall8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@busTedOaS Incorrect. From judge rulings on Gatherer: After you pay the {1W} cost one or more times, a second ability triggers. Players may respond to the new ability at that point. As that ability resolves, Intrepid Adversary gets its counters.

  • @Craigums4
    @Craigums4 ปีที่แล้ว

    @ 44:21 why not discard the treatment he knows about already??

  • @mrshathegreat7174
    @mrshathegreat7174 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    aggro player roping out (shakes head)

    • @busTedOaS
      @busTedOaS ปีที่แล้ว

      control elitism aside, mtg has a high skill ceiling with any deck. isn't that why we love it?

  • @arious1644
    @arious1644 ปีที่แล้ว

    i really want this deck!!! I love it!

  • @valentinsnake2448
    @valentinsnake2448 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi ! Could it be possible to do a IZZET Deck with Prowess ?

  • @Obversechaos
    @Obversechaos ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bad aggro player? No. Bad compared to CGB's normal level of play, yes. Still not bad.

  • @keiclera6596
    @keiclera6596 ปีที่แล้ว

    51:54 and they say aggro takes no thought

  • @rakdos36
    @rakdos36 ปีที่แล้ว

    In the last game the opponent seemed to intentionally hold before taking action so that the other gets desensitized to the timer.

  • @t-dogn6171
    @t-dogn6171 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks CGB.

  • @volkfidde4269
    @volkfidde4269 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm confused- in the last game why didn't the opponent just use Skrelv to make Rona unblockable?

  • @akumamatataaa
    @akumamatataaa ปีที่แล้ว

    good stream and ggs man :)

  • @jacksonbauer5199
    @jacksonbauer5199 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’m just now returning from an almost 6 month break from MtG so obviously this was my first stop.

  • @danielquigley2695
    @danielquigley2695 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Needs less Role cards, since you can't stack them. (10 maybe instead of 12) Maybe I'll play some number of Tyvar's stand

  • @graysonjones5404
    @graysonjones5404 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not sure I'm right either, but couldn't you have backed up etching, attacked with raiju, put the raiju counter on thrillseeker, raiju trigger does 3, sac etching for 5 to the face and they're dead?

  • @LiveGoDaYDaYs
    @LiveGoDaYDaYs ปีที่แล้ว

    see 1/1 in 3 drop gruul is a bit weird it used to be 4/3 or 5/5

  • @tigerpunch3402
    @tigerpunch3402 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    When I win a game on arena, I didn't beat my opponent, I beat the shuffler and matchmaker.

  • @nickniehaus1763
    @nickniehaus1763 ปีที่แล้ว

    Absolutely wild no swiftspear

  • @r.mar.673
    @r.mar.673 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That thrillseeker could go well in your infinite mana deck.

  • @MrDre10day
    @MrDre10day ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I'm pretty new at magic but how can one we terrible at continually attacking???

    • @itmeurdad
      @itmeurdad ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The same reason one can't type a single and simple sentence without a typo. Thinking is hard, especially when one is simultaneously going out of their way to be entertaining, while pre-editing and narrating.

    • @JohnVoves
      @JohnVoves ปีที่แล้ว

      Timing out lmao

  • @dens2002
    @dens2002 ปีที่แล้ว

    picnic ruiner would be a MVP in this deck

  • @homebrewed
    @homebrewed ปีที่แล้ว

    Imagine if Kumano wasn't balanced! Would of been a CLEAN move on the Kaito - I - Kumano Faces Kakkazan deals 1 damage to each opponent and each planeswalker they control. ;( Title card is perfect by the way - great name

  • @bloodshotred9268
    @bloodshotred9268 ปีที่แล้ว

    Rat tribal with new rats?

  • @Chaos-yr1cu
    @Chaos-yr1cu ปีที่แล้ว

    Where was the this is standard intro

  • @Nobody-xe9fc
    @Nobody-xe9fc ปีที่แล้ว

    I think The Rock said it best: "Know your role, and shut your mouth."

  • @fmuhkuh99
    @fmuhkuh99 ปีที่แล้ว

    not working for me sadly, currently at around 40% wr :(

  • @henrygandelman
    @henrygandelman ปีที่แล้ว

    I believe that last game was a L either way
    If Monstrous rage went on raiju, it would be bounced by Ottawara
    If it went on the etching, they could bounce it, leave the raiju and it would still not be lethal, but their turn would be the same, attack all, win with sheoldred

  • @Bleys0072
    @Bleys0072 ปีที่แล้ว

    So... Questing Malfurion?

  • @merke323
    @merke323 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Man, do I hate thalia... my archenemy is still farewell, but you see here the wicked lass becomes good as soon as your deck is remotely interesting. Ban please, better late than 1 more year

  • @Kuryux
    @Kuryux ปีที่แล้ว

    no samut?

  • @cruelzancore1475
    @cruelzancore1475 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Let's see new standard stuff! First!

    • @MrBe56
      @MrBe56 ปีที่แล้ว

      Indeed

  • @slowstroke
    @slowstroke ปีที่แล้ว +1

    McDonald's and lunch as usual. Let's play some cards!

  • @Pastrahmy
    @Pastrahmy ปีที่แล้ว

    Caution: this isn't really a "Mythic Contender" deck. After spending a couple days running this, its barely holding it's own in gold league. The meta is built around stopping mono red, so this rarely wins early, and it has very little stamina to go long. I'd say its disadvantaged against almost any other deck on the ladder. It's also very rare heavy on cards that won't be useful in other decks. Highly regret spending wildcards on it. Its a very fun deck, but not at all competitive.

  • @AnomalousMachine
    @AnomalousMachine ปีที่แล้ว

    They see my role'n they hatin

  • @trixmtll1393
    @trixmtll1393 ปีที่แล้ว

    Loving mono black rats
    Climbed to platinum 2 playing black red electrostatic infantry and manaform hellkites.
    But mono black rats took me to diamond 3 so far.
    Not bad I think considering I started mtga 2 weeks ago and my limited collection

  • @VanceMorris
    @VanceMorris ปีที่แล้ว

    Played this pile today and went 1 and 6. I just be stupid

  • @yorkieandthechihuahua
    @yorkieandthechihuahua ปีที่แล้ว

    I know I'm weird, but I'm glad there's no rotation on standard this year. Not because it improves standard per se, but because it now means there are sets on standard that aren't on alchemy and sets on alchemy that aren't on standard. If they rotate together all sets on standard are also on alchemy (though yes, some cards work differently).

  • @Jay-kf3od
    @Jay-kf3od ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it me, or has WoT beefed green up?

  • @henrygandelman
    @henrygandelman ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That's two days playing green.
    What's happening?!?!?

    • @moralnexus
      @moralnexus ปีที่แล้ว

      New meta: green is not terrible. What color is now on the bottom?

  • @benjaminhenry7593
    @benjaminhenry7593 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes yes but when are you going to destroy your opponents with gingerbrute combo hmm hmm

  • @jeremiahbachmann3901
    @jeremiahbachmann3901 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where are the card cosmetics? Must be having financial issues.

  • @MrBe56
    @MrBe56 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't need no money
    As long as I keep dancing

  • @FalconDS9
    @FalconDS9 ปีที่แล้ว

    way too much thinking for aggro. you allow your opponent so much time to think as well. aggro should push and push and push so they have no time to think, you want them to make hasty decissions because they try to adapt to your speed. and you should attack each turn to overwhelm them, drain their removal options quickly. maybe that deck needs more front line cannon fodder creatures.

  • @alijups6537
    @alijups6537 ปีที่แล้ว

    Poor oppenents, Sure he has to think about his next play… Thats why i stop playing Mtg Arena. Too many breaks …. cause super slow players or stupid trolls

  • @pangopod2969
    @pangopod2969 ปีที่แล้ว

    :)

  • @newjerseydamo
    @newjerseydamo ปีที่แล้ว

    Still can't get myself to play standard on Arena anymore thanks to delaying rotation. Combined with shuffler/matchmaker, and it's just a huge no. Shame, cos MTG is so good. Paper it is for the time being.

  • @Syehabdul
    @Syehabdul ปีที่แล้ว

    Im not a fans of aggro deck. Especially red green...

  • @trevordwyer5638
    @trevordwyer5638 ปีที่แล้ว

    To play aggro, you have to turn your brain off.

  • @tjrice5004
    @tjrice5004 ปีที่แล้ว

    FIRST comment

  • @andrebertolini5914
    @andrebertolini5914 ปีที่แล้ว

    first

  • @funkmastertraf
    @funkmastertraf ปีที่แล้ว

    This game is completely rigged, total bs