The blank Training Required For Spae Travel | Appollo 11
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 มิ.ย. 2024
- Subscribe to Spark for more amazing science, tech and engineering videos - goo.gl/LIrlur
The men who took that giant leap couldn't just hop in their rocket and fly to the moon. Their training was strict and their every move was monitored which ultimately meant they could achieve what very few ever will. Walk on the surface of the moon.
Follow us on Facebook: / sparkdocs
Follow us on Instagram: spark_chann...
Content licensed from Espresso to Little Dot Studios. Any queries, please contact us at: realstories@littledotstudios.com
#Spark #nasa #mooonlanding #neilarmstrong #nasadocumentary #space #spacetravel #sparksceince #moonlanding - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
![Apollo 8's Earthrise - A Christmas Miracle [4K] | Earthrise: The First Lunar Voyage | Spark](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/15npLT_tByQ/mqdefault.jpg)
![Apollo 8's Earthrise - A Christmas Miracle [4K] | Earthrise: The First Lunar Voyage | Spark](/img/tr.png)
“Has it ever struck you that life is all memory, except for the one present moment that goes by you so quick you hardly catch it going?”― Tennessee Williams
@@godsownlunatics9650
@@bvskyfacer4377 Not at all, literally life is either memory, present (which is VERY fleeting) or anticipation, be it good or bad anticipation
@@stevelowe2647 An interesting fact about Memory, I had a rather significant stroke a few years ago, one of the things its left me with is tracking short time memory loss, my consultant explained to me that the part of my brain that is damaged is the bit that records and stores things properly as they happen, (we'll call this the short time box) its incredibly frustrating tbh, its a bit like someone pressing the pause button on and off very briefly, short time memories are then condensed and stored in a different part of the brain (long term box) as long time memory, so when you remember something from say years ago, the brain takes that memory out again, gives it a dust down, then puts it in the short time memory box, then condenses it again and puts it back in the long term memory box, so when you remember something it is just from the last time you remembered it, even from years ago. Now Deja vu is a slight short circuit in the brain when it briefly puts bits of short term tracking memory in the long term memory box , this confuses the brain so it tries to take it back out again (repair the short circuit if you like) and put it back in the short time tracking box, this then makes you think your remembering something that has already happened before, which hasn't, its just now remembering the last time you remembered it, which was a split second ago when the brain was flitting it between the two memory boxes, I now have around 20 of these a day, because my short term tracking memory box is damaged by my stroke, this leads to a lot of confusion and false memories when I remember things I have not said or done and vice versa (which is why my wife needs to control and monitor all my medication. .. Now, I hope I have remembered all that correctly..but who can tell, not me that's for sure 🤣
True. Depressing, but true
Looking forward to SpaceX Astronauts landing on the moon and exploring former Apollo landing sites.
Not a chance. It was recorded in a studio.
@Son Of Cherve Its the truth.
@Son Of Cherve Im not even gonna answer that. But if you truly believe they had the know how to to send men to the moon and return them, alive, there is something wrong with you.
They just went to space and came back. It was all planned to win the space war against the Soviet Union.
Why are there no successive missions? After all the technology we have now..
@Son Of Cherve This is the same country that refuses to tell the truth about 9/11, and the gulf of Tonkin accident which resulted in the vietnam war. USA has a history of covering enormous things up. So yes, I wouldnt be surprised if the moon landings were a hoax.
I would,nt hold your breath on that one mate.
I remember all these flights. Thank you for bringing back some good memories.
Harriet Me too. I was young but remember being called inside to watch on the black and white tv. Great times and a lot more innocent.
Do you remember Tom Hanks landing on the moon too ? In 1995.
@@-First-Last No, but then Tom Hanks never went to the moon. Our astronauts did.
@@SMHman666 Definitely on both counts!
@@harrietharlow9929
Have you not seen the movie ? Wow !
I like how the narrator listed the Mercury 7 in order of their actual flights (with Slayton being last, since he didn'y fly until Apollo-Soyuz)
But they did eventually let him go up heart murmur and all.. I thought that was great..
@@godsownlunatics9650 You clearly need some better drugs.
@@godsownlunatics9650 Uh huh....and you deleted the completely non-sensical post I responded to....nice try,
You don't have to read the thread.
@@godsownlunatics9650I'm about to have s field day with you, kiddo... sit tight
@@godsownlunatics9650 you must not be an adult yet. Don't worry, it only gets better. Hang in there, kiddo☆
I just discovered a long time family friend was an engineer at North American Aviation during the 60s. He had some amazing stories about the rush to the moon!
Liar.
@@mathieutyler00 wow
@@mathieutyler00 I agree they can’t even figure out to go through the radiation belt today let alone 50+ years ago. It’s all BS. The belt is 25,000 miles thick
@@A10Jedi Hi A, hope that you are well. You wrote "They can’t even figure out to go through the radiation belt today let alone 50+ years ago". I assume that you are referring to the Van Allen Belt. To put your mind at ease here is quote from James Van Allen himself in 2004. "the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage - a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights. I made such estimates in the early 1960s and so informed NASA engineers who were planning the Apollo flights. These estimates are still reliable." Interestingly these radiation belts will still provide a challenge for the Artemis missions both in terms of choosing a trajectory through them and shielding not only for the crew but for the electronics and guidance systems. The modern electronics and IC's used in Orion are much more sensitive to radiation damage and interference than the electronics used in the Apollo Program. Take care.
I remember being allowed to stay up late to Watch this...(I'm in the U.K.) I was only 8, but I remember it like it was yesterday, but landing Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin on the Moon wasn't the most remarkable thing they did....That was getting them Back again..and Alive !! ....Marvellous 😊
@Alvino A LOL, i didn't even see the answer to poor Coldeb, but I was sure sure sure, that a MORON would answer something and BINGO !!!!! Thanks for sharing making an idiot of yourself! Please watch the film again, there's something you missed boy! :D :D :D Oh, and go back to school and do your science homework please!
@Alvino A it's not that people don't question. It's that people like you dont want to see the evidence. If you REALLY cared to fact check the moon landing, you would be searching Google for answers, not on TH-cam.
My parents let me stay up late that night and I remember how excited I was to see Neil Armstrong make that " one small step".
I was 14, looking over my mother's shoulder and chastising her for believing in only what she saw as she was glued to the Television.
T V was her God, but I told her it was a ridiculous hoax, and she was nuts to be sucked in to such a mere concocted show. I'm sure she was mad as hell, because she was a tax payer, and didn't want to be duped.
@@harrietharlow9929 Did you know Neil Armstrong cocked that line up..he was supposed to say..”That’s one small step far a man” etc etc, …but I suppose we can forgive him, what with all the excitement and all 😂
Rocket gives the capsule its initial speed. The rocket shuts off and due to earth gravity it continues to get slower and slower. When it gets close enough to the moon, it’s gravity causes it to speed up. Then they fire the rocket to slow up to orbital speed of the moon.
"... it’s gravity causes ..."
it's
its
Learn the difference, genius.
Neil literally landed himself on the moon.
They are the real heroes not the ones Hollywood got!
I love 1960's astronauts.. 😭😭❤️❤️❤️
Yeah, about that...
@@williamhorton9763 What about that, Will?
@Dashing Johnny Too bad there are so many people who don't understand enough physics and technology to realize the moon landings were not a hoax. Only 6% of the population have been stupified by conspiracy videos that have been proven thousnads of times to be all false information.
@@jonathanzimmer8143 Jonathan, don't forget the Earth is FLAT :D :D :D :D
No Moon landing, 5g and covid19, flat earth.... wow...
Why is there so many dumb people on this planet????
@@W-733_KWX Agree with the so many dumb people on the planet that 'believe' the patently fake moon narrative....
Hopefully one day soon people will understand that everything is in space. It's just that some parts of space have more stuff in them than do other parts of space.
Unless you you think small and believe everything is under a dome....
Wish I could figure things out like what you can
@@drewthompson7457 🤣🤣
How DID NASA Land Neil Armstrong On The Moon?
Buzz Aldrin: [Hands in pockets. Turns away. Mumbles] "They landed me too."
Ikr, just cuz buzz didnt land his foot in the moon first doesn't mean he shouldn't get any credits
@colan powel are you an idiot, it happened, it would've been harder and more expensive if they faked it.
Buzz Aldrin is an asshole and a drunk.
@@ConnMC No it wouldn’t have. A movie set would be much less in comparison.
@@tamarafletcher7965 No, it wouldn't. You're not thinking critically.
When filming a movie, nobody is pretending that what they're filming is real.
Your supposed _Apollo_ film set wouldn't have that luxury. The people involved would need to actually pay for all the supposed _Apollo_ equipment (even if it didn't work), and _then_ pay extra for the film set and VFX.
Another thing you're missing is that _Apollo_ footage isn't like your typical film - it's shot with one camera in a continuous manner, with no cuts.
_Another_ thing you're not considering is the fidelity of the supposed VFXs, which Hollywood is still unable to match _to this very day_ using purely practical effects.
NASA was so smart brilliant creative, and imaginative in pulling off one of man's greatest feats
Nope, they managed to fool enough people for long enough. Consider and accept that MOST people utilise only two sources of information to form their world view, tv thus paying for their and families propagandization and “news” papers controlled since operation mockingbird.
And yet...nasa can't do it 'today' because they've lost the 'technology'...!!
It's a patently fake narrative friend...the moon is translucent and emits it's own light...man has not been on the moon.
@@elmoomle4565 more than 2 generations later the European, china, and Japan space programs are still figuring out how to land man safely on the moon.
@@elmoomle4565 Have your ever tried to understand what that “lost technology” really means? No, I don’t think so…
@@edgardovillacorte7012 what are those countries manned moonlanding programs called?….
Adblock Plus should drop some adds on TH-cam. Seemingly, somebody didn't get the memo.
Just fast forward to the end of the video & then replay, all of the ads disappear
" Ven der rockets go up, who cares where they come down ? That's not my department", says Werner Von Braun
- Tom Lehrer, "Werner Von Braun"
Thanks for the wonderful musical memories Professor Lehrer
SierraThunder
Yes...Thankfully
we now land the boosters...Blue Origin and Space X were the first to land booster cores.,but the technology and software was spun off NASA's Surveyor,Mars Apollo LM,lander programs
Short answer? Talent and mass collaboration of people
ANd don't forget, LOTS of money. NASA got 4% Of the federal budget in the mid 60s. NIxon chopped it in the 70s, and now, NASA gets only about 0.4% Of the federal budget. And still does some increditable work, just no manned missions at this point.
@Thomas Pickering :You're delusional.
@Thomas Pickering You must be really sad inside yourself to revolve yourself around everything being a conspiracy. Moon landing was real. We found out about how the moon formed by bringing rocks from there. You think that Moon spit them to Earth for no reason? Stop being a conspiracy person who doesn't acknowledge anything. You are probably so easy to manipulate. If I tell you air was invented by aliens to brainwash us on living and government sprays magic powder to control us you will say that is true and it's a conspiracy. Stop being a dickhead
@Thomas Pickering You don't know what you are talking about then my friend. You don't need to explain this to me. Let's end this point. Although I also have my doubts with many things US Government did to their people(Like killing JFK and 9-11) Where it is obvious they were involved, I can't say the same about the moon landings. It was not possible to fake them back in 1969. You don't need to be a genius to realize that. So my advice to you is to think rationally and not listen to every bullshit you hear bro. Again, I also think there are some sketchy shits US Gov did. But moon landings was not their business and they couldn't fake it. They actually needed to get there. Even fking Soviets acknowledged that. Let that sink in a bit
@jimmyfly its not possible fore the mass of people to keep a secret when the don't know its a secret.
interesting film Paul. good to know 'what happened next'... the answer to that is often more surprising than the event itself..... sounds like a YT theme...happy new year from us all at the Professor Simon Channel.
I think it would have been appropriate to mention also that Russia and Gagarin took to space earlier and that this must have added pressure and resolve to the program.
You're right... A brief mention of those incredible achievements by the soviet union would have fit nicely within the scope of this documentary. Those milestones made first by our former WWII Allie (but sadly by this time had become our cold war rival) was literally the spark that lit the fuse under President Kennedy and thrust us headlong into the space race and uncharted waters. I honestly think had it not been for the early success's of the soviet union, we may not have had the wherewithal to accomplish what we did as a nation back then.
Undoubtedly.
Heroes of the Human Race are the astronauts and cosmonauts that paved the way for our understanding of space and exploration through man spaceflights, a legacy that's still alive today.
I agree and look forward every year to celebrating Apollo Day
outstanding
I was gonna watch this, but I left when I saw all the advertisement that was inserted.
you don't know how to use ad-block?
Mr. OGPaint I had none.
But you still had the time to write a comment.
*Awesome documentary Spark.*
16:32 does this mean that air hockey is spin-off NASA technology?
you got it Chris.. but they had to change from people to little plastic disks because the people kept falling off the tables..
In the producer and presenter reality, my bet goes to air-hockey.
Helluva summer; watched Armstrong and Aldrin walk on the Moon , lost my virginity, turned 16 and went to Woodstock
Man o man sounds like a great time to be alive 👌😎
Sounds lit even tho they faked it still sound crazy
You do realize the moon landing was made on a movie set right here on planet earth don't you? Cool you got to Woodstock; I was in Viet Nam.
@@rearview2709
I don't realize that :
* The crew of Apollo 11 had no " Hollywood Star " charisma
* The images were below Hollywood standards ....for the 1920 's
*No Hollywood moon landing movies ever had LOR in them
*No books , movies , or magazine articles ever had something as functionally fugly as the LM in them
@@rearview2709 how can you trick 400k staff members, engineers, suppliers, university staff, etc? plus some million TV viewers? plus the USSR doing their maths with triangular communication, so they did know that apollo 13 was 200k miles away off earth orbit? if USSR scientists knew that apollo was fake, boi, that would have been some nice propaganda there. on the other hand, if you don't know for yourself for sure, you have to believe. like you believe in something like a god that you actually never saw or felt, right? we all know how christian and obedient to authority american people are. I'm sorry for you that you have been forced to fight in vietnam. must have been a shocking experience there.
When Kennedy announced the Moon mission we had not just barely orbited an astronaut, we had only shot Alan Shepard on his 15 minute ballistic ride into space.
But, we knew we could do it.
meanwhile what was really being achieved far outweighed that.
@ 22:05 I hope that was a 'spare' glove !
it´s all so fake. i´m tired of laughing
@@antoniopacheco864 I swear to god, this is not the place for flat earthers or fake moon landing people. Grab your tinfoil hat and watch a 9/11 fake video jeez..
@@ThatNickYouKnow4010 what's your name Airways? Go fly to the moon then. I believe whatever I want to believe I advice you to the same.
@@antoniopacheco864 Try keeping your stupid uninformed beliefs to yourself then.
@@rollon1181 don't be like that. It's not a belief. I just saw a glove. That's it
Its actually amazing they found over 100 guys who had accomplished so much at so young
the quality of content is so high that i wouldn't mind a hundred ads...
you don't know how to use ad-block?
Morgan.... How?
It takes 3 balls to land on the Moon! 🌚... I saw Buzz Aldrin speak for an hour here in NZ in 2010 about his experience ON the Moon and in space 👍🇳🇿
Wanna buy a bridge?
yes, no doubt about it, the earth is spherical.
Michael Fong totally
Michael Fong Hey, we all Really know earth is a cube, duh.
the ads has let this video down sadly!
what ads
you don't know how to use ad-block?
Went from stagecoaches to walking on another world in 100 years, amazing.
And 50years later cannot go to the moon. Fake.
Klem Bach that just adds to his point we can’t even figure out how they built the pyramids without machines but we can get to mars and the moon it’s a hoax wake up sheeepy
Went from stagecoaches to a movie set; ie 2001: A Space Odyssey; Star Wars and Star Trek; The believers of 'FAKE SPACE" are complete FOOLS !!
@@erniefasbender4939 we "Can" go to the moon, but take away the funding then that becomes financially impossible. Blame your government for lack of moon missions. Not NASA, not anybody else. Also - blame ignorant morons... such as yourself.
I saw Apollo 11 lift off in person from Cape Kennedy and believed it went to the Moon for 40 years. Today I am 100% certain all of the Apollo missions were hoaxes and that I was duped. Man has never left Earth orbit much less land on the Moon. You space fans need to do some growing up. It is common knowledge that the Moon landings never happened. You all have been mind controlled,
We are repeating those challenges all over again with the help of SpaceX & their concept design, building & testing of Star hopper & starship prototypes. Now I know what it was like to be alive when the Saturn 5 was being developed & first flown. The development of the F1 engines that powered the Saturn 5.
What if SpaceX built the Saturn 5 & the first 2 stages landed back on Earth like the Falcon 9 first stages. How cool would that have been to see.
Eight years to get to the moon and half a century later nine years for NASA and a billionaire to get two guys to the ISS
The Saturn V was awesome...and we went from the V2 to the Saturn V in less than 20 years. Remarkable.
@Harriet Harlow yeah the guy running nasa back then was a nazi.
Way too many commercial interruptions. TH-cam is a place where viewers used to go to avoid ads, Now TH-cam has twice the ads that commercial tv ever had
Alex Wilke gotta get that YT premium man. I just got suckered into it but no ads is amazing
That's weird, I had ZERO ads and haven't in over a year!! Get with the program nub!!
@@incidentalist Wow, your a friendly clown... thank God for people lke you, Einstein
22:03 That's what $200,000 looks like flying off.
Can anyone tell me what the title of the soundtrack is at the end?
Great docu!
It's called Tommy Funky
@@nicaxiv14jd is that right?
There are music credits at the end of the show. There’s no indication of who composed what.
Chris Duncan & Mark Heath
CDMH Music
Kevin MacLeod
‘Infados’
(Incompetech.com)
Igge Scoce
Gari Biasillo
Cinematic Soundtrack
In response to Bart Sibrel's attack on our astronauts and space program I offer the following questions to him: I’ve viewed the April 12, 2020, video by Mr. Akers regarding the falsification of the Apollo 11 moon landing mission and have some questions:
Which moon landing:
Are you suggesting, through Akers, that all the moon landings were faked during the period of June 1st through June 3d of 1968? What of the other missions that touched down at different landing sites on the moon, providing different topography that would have been necessary to create in the hangar.
How did they know how many fake landings would be needed? Remember, each fake landing requires a fake takeoff from the fake moon’s surface, complete with fake radio calls. And all of this was completed in only 3 days of shooting?
Additionally, how do you account for the different Lunar rovers. Why would they predict that the design would change over such a short time if all of this was faked?
Are you suggesting that we never made it to the moon at all, even to orbit? If so, how do you account for Apollo 8’s “Earth Rise” photo taken by Astronaut Bill Anders in December of 1968.
Location:
Cannon versus Groom Lake and/or Area 51 - why pick Cannon, a traditional Air Force Base instead of a highly secure facility such as Groom Lake or Area 51 where a variety of deep black programs were underway?
Akers states that before his father arrived on station that “100’s of dump trucks” delivered the materials to build the fake set. Then Akers states that after the taping, the set was disassembled, which would have required the same number of trucks to haul away the materials - and nobody noticed?
Personnel Involved:
Eugene Kranz, Neil Armstrong, and Buzz Aldrin - Why Gene Kranz? He was the Flight Director and where was Mike Collins? If they needed to provide concurrent audio with the video, I see the need for Kranz, however, they’d also need audio from Collins in Columbia.
In his book, “Apollo 8” Jeffrey Kluger recounts George Low’s August 1968 idea of switching the Apollo mission lineup which would, in effect, negate the idea that Armstrong and Aldrin being pre-selected as co-conspirators during the June 1 through 3 videotaping of the “faked” landing.
Akers’ father:
Entry Access list read to viewers by Akers did not include his father’s name; therefore, he could not have witnessed the videotaping.
Akers father, as an NCO, would not be solely responsible for such security without an officer in charge. As a former group commander under whom was the security forces squadron, then known as Air Police, there is no way he was responsible for this level of security assignment.
Akers father was sworn to secrecy by the NSA? Why the NSA? NSA was created in 1952 to evaluate signals intelligence which had nothing to do with the NASA projects
Deathbed confession:
This video is a deathbed confession of a deathbed confession. The pictures of Akers’ fathers AP badge and flag lend nothing to the story.
Since young Akers went to school wearing long sleeve shirts to cover the purple bruises, it may be safe to assume Akers the elder may have abused his son.
The original information was destroyed in a mysterious fire, 2 men in “Black Suits” visited Akers and his house was broken into twice.
I’m wondering why you called the police to report the break ins versus Akers. What, if anything, was stolen, and was that to lead us to believe the burglaries were in relation to any evidence Akers may have had in the house?
In his January 29, 2013, video, Writer/director S G Collins of Postwar Media debunks every theory that the Apollo Moon landings could have been faked in a studio. The filmmaker looks at the video technology of the late 1960's, showing alleged fraud was simply not possible.
In essence, SG Collins describes how, what Sabril profess to be true, was impossible in 1968.
Moon Landings Faked? Filmmaker Says Not! - TH-cam
I gotta watch this for school as an intro to physics help
Remember the dates, distance to travel how much force is need to escape earth's gravity, full needed, speed etc. You'll be good.
Read the bible buddy
What do you have to watch for English class?
Are you above 3rd grade? That’s the max of intellectual wisdom that this Saturday morning cartoon could communicate.
Sorry, no Jetsons comic for the break!
I hope you are doing well in the coarse. Physics, for me, was the subject that made all the mathematics that I learned finally click.
That was really well made and most interestingly entertaining
Ya know I really enjoyed the documentary but littering it with ads kinda ruined it
you don't know how to use ad-block?
@QuIgYx So --- you've just watched a full hour of honest, carefully considered comment from Eminent scientists and experts ( two of which I know personally, so I can vouch for their qualifications ), and you Still say that???
That just Proves that you are not able to think clearly obviously.
Hello, any idea whet is the song at 7:00?
I’m here for the “it never happened” comments.
Not as good as this crazy story I heard about the earth being a sphere.
@@mr.roboto8324 It is what you believe it is. Just like Santa Claus is real to kids, the moon landing is real to those who wish to believe.
Crypto Jack comparing Santa to God makes sense. Comparing it to moon landing doesn’t.
@@mr.roboto8324 People have made science their new religion.
Crypto Jack science is testable and reliable. When something is proven wrong they go back to the drawing board. This world would be far better off without religion
Judging by the comments, I'm so glad I have TH-cam Red!!! 😆😆😆
Wait TH-cam Red does something about this?
Reds Rhetoric does something about these comments, check out his channel.
Sounds like he doesn't like the truth.
Easy question...VERY VERY carefully.
anyone knows what the end theme is called?? Great docu!
Darude sandstorm I think
These are the music credits at the end of the show:
Chris Duncan & Mark Heath
CDMH Music
Kevin MacLeod
‘Infados’
(Incompetech.com)
Igge Scoce
Gari Biasillo
Cinematic Soundtrack
22:03 ... where is that glove going!!
Lithostheory ha i saw it too
Eventually deorbit I'd think
wind blew it out ?
To challenge the Russians in their Voskhod to an orbital dual!
To the surface of the water in the pool.
Thanks for a very informative and well made video.
Absolutely 👏
Watch the post moon landing interview !
Why? Because idiot moon-hoax nuts think there's something incriminating in their body language 3 weeks after their return? lol!
Your "arguments" keep getting weaker & weaker!
My psychiatrist says it’s Glossophobia, all the classic symptoms apparently. The whole lying thing is BS
Neil Armstrong left his footprints on the moon but the first thing to touch down was the landing gear on the lunar Lander. That landing gear was designed and built in Canada. One small step for us. Glad we could help. Stay safe my friends.
The first manmade thing to touch down on Moon, was the Soviet Luna probe.
I’m Mexican
NASA ALEDGES that Neil Armstrong ALSO tossed his spacesuit boot overlays out of the lunar lander before lift off 🙄
And the space shuttle storage bay arm. Gave the shuttle hands.
@@Mooseracks they shit in bags and left it up there too so what's your point?
I love this stuff.
@Thomas Pickering : why would you believe Kevin is telling shameless lies? But enjoy whatever you are capable of understanding.
@Thomas Pickering: Kevin is the original poster who started this thread. You've already replied to him once.
You understand very little
What laws of physics do you believe need to be broken to go to the moon?
What do you believe was impossible? The Saturn V? The command module? The LM? The fuel? The oxygen? The food? The math?
So what do you believe prevented every moon mission?
Why not prove you are "capable of understanding quite a bit a more than you and your ilk think."
@Thomas Pickering :So you know there is no science preventing all the moon missions that have happened since 1959. So you just have to learn that many space agencies have had moon missions and are planning more and that the U.S. have landed 12 men on the moon and returned them. This fact has been verified by several space agencies, with the landing sites photographed, as well as a mountain of evidence that the whole world can accept.
@Thomas Pickering : You're missing the entire Apollo missions from1968 to 1972, where the U.S. landed 6 missions. Too many drugs during that time or just incapable of understanding quite a bit less than the rest of the world's experts. There are many experts in many fields that have verified that the Apollo missions happened. Only idiots believe in hoaxes, and have never proved any of theirt beliefs.
Where on Earth do you image such a magical studio under vacuum and at 1/6th g has been built? Movie productors have stated that the landing could not be faked in 1969. So you believe you know better than the experts in science math, physics, movie making, etc, etc.
Do you know that low res CGI became available in 1976?
Instead of stupid staterments, how about proof of your erronous belieifs?
How about an address and pictures of you fabulous impossible studio where magic happens? You made the stupid claim, back it up.
You use the royal "We" for yourself? How modest of you.
@Thomas Pickering : So paranoid and delusional.
Where is any proof of your treasured hoaxes?
You seem to understand very little.
Why not look up experts in whatever field you chose to verify what you can't understand
So you don't understand what a vacuum does to dust and other things on the moon. This does not surprise me.
The masses on the moon are all affected by the 1/6th G on the moon, verses the 1 G we enjoy on earth.
Prove your erronous belief that the landings are fake. You have no evidence, or understanding of what happened.
Since when is "I BELIEVE" proof of anything. So you do not understand even the scientific method. No wonder you can't understand experts.
All governments lie. Give some proof that NASA lied about the Apollo missions. (After all, you agreed that there was nothing preventing the missions)
Your knowledge of your truth would not stand up in a court of law.
You don't even know where your magical studio is located, or how it could be built or function. There is no evidence for your magical studio, yet somehow you like to believe it exists. That's great logic!
Why not go on a tour of Langley? You would find no evidence for your beliefs there either.
Since the best movie producers said Apollo couldn't be faked by them, what do you believe you know that these people who actually make movies don't know?
You have presented no proof for your treasured beliefs, just misunderstandings.
Maybe drugs could help you.
Why am I wasting time when you can add nothing of value?
Have the last words, it might make you feel better.
25:47 anyone else notice Buzz was riping stuff off and losing stuff all over the place?
But the objects tend to go in one direction and if you were there you would understand why, and no, is not the gravity effect.
Whatever it was, it reentered the atmosphere and burned to ashes quite fast.
At 22:04 someone's glove is now space debris
Fake glove, it is actually a three dimensional simulator made by alien overlords to make us believe that there is nothing but empty space outside of our flat planet.
Joking.
Dammit man, that was my pooptube cleaning glove! You float your ass out there and get it or I'm leaving you here.
How disthey trained landing and another launch? They have to land on the moon and launced from the moon.
...1st class ticket on the Von Braun Express. 😂👍
Original. Not.
What a brilliant documentary, including lots of footage I had never seen before. Thank you SO much for posting it!
Lots of faked footage. Absolutely brilliant how they tricked all of mankind.
@@Beefeater911 what I don't understandz why you desperately want this mission to be fake? What if its true?
No one has ever been to the moon.
I don’t want the moon missions to be fake, but they were, without a doubt, fake.
J T elvis still alive eh , Tupac in Cuba , earth flat 😁
Cool
I love Neil Armstrong Man on the moon
Excellent video!
To all of you who say men never went to the moon you really shouldn't judge, belittle, or denigrate the achievements of others using your own limitations, shortcomings, paranoia, and general lack of intelligence as comparative measures. Might I suggest you research the Dunning-Kruger effect, it will give you a huge insight into yourselves.
hackenbush23 do you believe Oswald killed Kennedy?
@@redarmy1778 Very odd question given the subject matter of the video, but anyway what I believe doesn't matter, it's what the facts prove. Knowing something to be true and believing something to be true are not the same thing.
hackenbush23 rubbish
It is the compulsive defenders and apologists who must repeatedly name-call and paste assumptions -- as you also have done here. Such behavior enlightens us to the desperation as we see the same kind of responses over and over again.
The astronauts move without restriction or difficulty while walking and working on the moon. This however cannot occur in a vacuum. Suit technology hasn't reached the point where an astronaut can be ambulatory enough to permit walking in a vacuum without very stiff and awkward movements or great effort to strain against suit pressure that is multiplied over several hundred square inches for each limb of the suit. 5 psi becomes hundreds of pounds in the leg of a suit for example, and a substantial part of that pressure is working against any movement away from the shape formed under pressure. The same occurs for the smaller arms of the suit, moved by human arms of proportionately less strength. Fingers also move only with difficulty, whose strength drains quickly under the strain so that useful work would be nearly impossible. An advanced form of suit that incorporates a lightweight exoskeleton might be possible, maintaining suit pressure while permitting movement, perhaps power assisted. Clearly, this is not what we've seen so far, while there is evidence of faking some of the space videography even in low earth orbit.
While hammering, we can hear the sound of hammering in the astronaut's microphone though he stands in a vacuum on the moon's surface. We're told the sound traveled through is arm and into his suit having a breathable oxygen mixture. Another astronaut throws an object and we hear the sound clearly as the objects strikes the lunar module -- no arm to conduct the sound into the astronaut's suit. . No other mic was on, other than those worn by both astronauts. .
We expect more name-calling, derogatory language and assumptions in place of any legitimate or genuine response. Prove us wrong. .
Well, it's time to *sort by new*
Prepare yourself for the Storm of the Negative IQ
The positive comments are not rich, pretty sad actually.
anyone notice on the footage of the spacewalk there is a glove that goes floating by, in front of the camera
I hope he has a spare
That really happened - a spare themal glove did float away while Ed White was outside his Gemini craft.
Great upload : the same narrator from the Saturn V story
water boils in a vacuum space, how does blood behave in a vacuum space?
What is the human body made out of?
Who cares? None of the astronauts were exposed to vacuum.
TimReed22222 their suits were so how did the cooling/heating system worked in a vacuum?
@@Achisachis73 What are you asking ME for? Google it.
@@Achisachis73 magic
TimReed22222 you can just say that you don’t know. You just believe.
more ads please
There is no ads on youtube. It's 2019 for christ sake!
I dont know where you live but if there is no ads over there, im moving at your place lollllll With a PC its easy to block ads with the iOS, omfg lol
@@agentpr24 you cant use adblock?
So far, on an iPhone I cannot block ads ... unless you know how and would like tonshare this secret 😜
@@agentpr24 sorry. I suggest using pc and Android))
We are going to set up a Tim Horton Donut Shop on the moon. Gretzky and Crosby will be there. Perhaps some poutine for lunch?
Pp
Its good to kno that America will always keep the world amused just like ther hollywood stars..
Bad English is not a sign of a stupid person. Don't beat yourself up over it.
Bang, zoom!
One of these days Alice.
Great video. Thanks Spark!
Sadly the comments are full of youtube trolls:/
I really wish people who upload videos about the Apollo missions would just delete all the idiotic conspiracy theorist comments. I'm so sick of seeing these tin foil hat nutjobs.
@@ct92404 exactly! Nasanuts wanna believe nonsense (Apollo went to moon w/out any fuel!) and astro's dealt with + and minus 200 degree temps wearing snowsuits! Omg!
@@nancyelliot8411 You're a schizophrenic idiot. As I explained to you already the last time you posted one of your many nutjob conspiracy theorist comments in another video, the Apollo spacecraft carried fuel in the Service Module, which was only separated just before re-entry. Now take off the tin foil hat and get a life.
@@nancyelliot8411 "snow suits"
@Thomas Pickering yeah, right, your so-called "truth" is whatever bullshit you read on conspiracy theorist websites and anything nutjobs like Alex Jones and Bart Sibrel tell you. Just STFU and go shove your tin foil hat up your ass.
They didn't mention Apollo 1. We learn from failure too.
39:00 Chalked WOOD maybe??
At 39 minutes, when most people could tell they're still practicing on earth? You can can see a guy in a sports jacket in the background. I don't know what they practiced with, but wood would be closer to 1/6 g than a rock on earth. You might be right.
Why most of people forget about Micheal Collins in apollo 11
And they never talk about all the other important test flights that multiple other people had to do to make it possible - sure, give good ol' neil his credit, but those peeps deserve it too
True
@@hugh-martinrouxhughy7419 Did you actually see the video??
@@geracb I did actually and in fact I'm gonna watch it again today. I was more referring to the "most people" that yubik nakarmi was talking about, not the documentary itself (which I think is brilliant) - although I should have specified that a year ago when I made the comment. Apologies.
@@hugh-martinrouxhughy7419 Well, yeah. I think I misread what everybody said here. I apologize too. Greetings.
Gosh, what a moving, fascinating, mind-boggling adventure that we humans by rights shouldn't have gone on, didn't have the technology to go on, but went on anyway -- because we're humans dammit, and this is what we do!!
Absolutely friend, absolutely...
Because we,re humans damn it and most of us are incapable of critical thinking
@@williambennett26 Ahh? What other animal is better in it? Not to forget Moon landings were political, cold war move. Showing superiority in military and technology. Today we have nothing like that. No one want to spend billions just to land on some barren sphere, just to prove it's doable...
"science isn't about why. It's about why not?"
In the first minute of the show, the narrator says, “But in 1961, when Kennedy pledged to put a man on the moon, NASA had barely put a man into orbit.” This is incorrect. Kennedy made his announcement shortly after NASA put its first man into space, when Alan Shepard flew a suborbital mission on May 5, 1961. NASA didn’t put a man into orbit until John Glenn flew on February 20, 1962.
Merely damage control. Their Satanic construct is beginning to unravel. Wake up my friends. We have been lied to for generations, the oligarchy is losing their grip
@@robertmurphy5105 Twat...
I have a question for all of the moon deniers on here. Where do you think all of the moon rocks that are in museums and labs all over the world? What about the reflectors that we left on the moon that you can bounce a laser off of to this day. Explain that.
I did answer, but yet again I received CommieTube's patented comment ghosting.
They hate the truth with a demonic passion.
Prove to me that the moon rocks came from the moon and then I’ll sit you down for your lesson.
@@Frankiej22472 They are extremely dry more so than earthly rocks and contain traces of hydrazine a component of the lander's rocket fuel that contaminated the surface on landing where the samples were picked up from.
@@williamhorton9763 What is truth when you lie to yourself about so much, and know so little?
i was 14 years old when apollo 11 landed on the moon, back then we had 3 networks abc,nbc ,and cbs they all carried the moon landing for 3 straight days, america was proud
And you have allowed your cognitive dissidence regarding the moon landings to rule you.
Understandably there are few with the critical thinking ability and courage to overcomewho can overcome their cd
@@williambennett26 Is there a name for that fantasy world you live in ?
@Alvino A They had space suits and the temperature You are talking about, may be reached at lunar noon. They all landed and took off again in early lunar morning
@Alvino A That’s Why they had white suits and Cooling devises. The cameras were Well isolated and furthermore painted with reflective paint. What makes You think they would risk to be the laughing stock of the century by faking the landnings 10 times (1 time falling)?
@Alvino A The scientists at NASA are not as stupid and ignorant as You clearly are. How come You are unable to find the information You want?
They had a TV Camera on the Rover.That Rover they parked at a calculated spot, where the Rising LM would be kept in frame when it .lifted. As with all rocket starts, They had a count down. At about ”T minus 2 seconds”, Ed Fendell at mission Control pushed the ”tilt up” button. The signal reached Moon at the same time the LM began to Rise. The Camera tilted and kept the spacecraft in frame. When the LM had reached the altitude where it tilted over to gain speed down the range to reach orbit velocity, Fendell tried to follow it manually with the Camera. That is Why it went out of frame and seemingly started to ”dance around”, Because of the signal delay. They managed to fix it according to plan the third time, on Apollo 17.
Satisfied? No, of course not. You Will just find another thing to complain about.
Flat earthers don't like this
It's sad that they didn't even touch on the sacrifices of Grissom, Chafee, and White in the Apollo I fire. Had that horrible tragedy not occured they wouldn't have discovered all of the really serious problems with Apollo vehicle as a whole & we would have lost a good many astronauts in the progress, and possibly would have never made it to the moon.
The unofficial but unavoidable verdict was that the cabin could only have been filled with oxygen on purpose. Numerous people died during the Apollo Project ten of them astronauts during everyday life on Earth, Only in America eh? Thank god.
@@williambennett26 was pure oxygen standard at the time. That has always Bern my understanding and that the different atmosphere was developed and used because of the Apollo 1 tragedy.
They certainly should have. Those men died which advanced the safety of all astronauts who came after the.
More commercials than my tv. Visual junk mail.
Fantastic documentary, thanks
How could they train for what it would be like on the surface of the moon, if they have never been there.
@F6 Train for what though. They had no idea what to expect once they got there. They had all these machines to simulate the Moon's gravity, but who said that's what it's like on the moon prior to them landing. How did they know their simulations would be correct?
Proof has shown they never went to the moon, no one can go to the moon, otherwise other countries would be sending man to the moon also if it was as easy as it was in 1969. If you research the moon landings you can clearly see no man has ever gone to the moon.
@J Calhoun
The proof they did not go is the moon is in the whole entire mission. Anyone with half a brain cell can work out it is impossible to use what they did to achieve what they say they did. Look at the whole mission again, the vehicles they used and how they say they used them, you will clearly find it cannot be done, even NASA themselves will tell you its impossible to go to the moon with what they know right now, They cannot do it now but you believe they done it back then in 1969? Man cannot even build a spaceship today with all the money in the world. All we can make is satellites that orbits within the earths atmosphere. Please show me one spaceship man has built that leaves earths orbit fly's around space for a couple of weeks or months and then comes back into earth orbit and lands again? Their should be 100's of these vehicles by now. Space exploration has gone backwards since 1969, why do you think that is? Money? LMAO, money is not the issue.
@J Calhoun LMAO, It is you who has nothing to back your claim that NASA went to the moon. Please show me your evidence and i will pull my pants down and shit all over it with facts. Please enlighten me with your proof? I have researched this topic for 7 years so please make sure its good otherwise you are going to look a bigger fool than you do now.
Kevin Hollerbach It was an expensive, meticulous, yet very risky hightech project that had been impossible without great determination, perseverance and courage!
The moon buggy was where they jumped the shark.
Why? The rover was AWESOME! And you bothered to actually learn how it was transported & how it worked, you'd agree.
See below
The first two men to walk on the Moon were both born only 3 years after the last Model T Ford was built (1930/1927 respectively)
Walter B That's sobering. What I wonder is how soon will it be before we visit the first star besides our sun? Right now, that seems impossible, but someone (or something) is doing it. In the late 60's I witnessed a classic 'Flying Saucer' at night, slowly fly directly over my house at an altitude of less than 100'. Years later, when I first watched the movie, "Close Encounters of the Third Kind", which has a similar scene, my hair literally stood up on end as it was so eerily similar to what I had witnessed decades earlier.
is this not more proof it was faked?
@@stephendelaney5766 Oh, yes. Absolutely!
"I'd go to the Moon in a nanosecond. The problem is we don't have the technology to do that anymore. We used to but we destroyed that technology and it's a painful process to build it back again." Don Pettit, NASA...what??????? poor NASA,
you can't go higher than an air balloon
Your taking what he said out of context it took nasa 152 billion dollars to put a man on the moon even cutting that number in half to 76 billion it would still take NASA 4 and a bit years to build a Saturn V. So everyone who worked on the mission either died or retired. So yea that's how you lose technolgy. Please research when you comment on a video against the video.
@@dantaedahmesl7441 what??????????? some people died or retired and NASA lost the technolgy ? Don Pettit said half truth, the other anyone can understand
@@vasilisgeorgiou870 no no no, all people died Nd retired what he ment by that was we can't make the technolgy anymore cause of money limitations
Do you expect them to have a whole bunch of Saturn V rockets in storage, ready to launch at a moment's notice or something?
@@dantaedahmesl7441 Nobody kept the plans? Thousands of hours of data? LOTS of people die or retire and yet, people still build cars and airplanes. With today's technology, computer design, 3D printing of prototype parts, improved rockets and fuels, better metallurgy, composite materials, and Elon Musk to get the job done, on time and under budget,,, what's the problem?
All these guys are super human.. imagine the stresses.. is this going to work? will i be left on the moon... to die..... will this work when it has too ? .. etc .. the whole way.. there and back
ybet1000 The same questions they, as being military test pilots (most of them) would Ask almost every day of work.
Just my opinion... Applies to many other docs/true crime programs too.. Just the narrator talking would have improved this gem of a documentary...
Absolutely. All the narrators are annoying an unnecessary - just one would be fine.
Great video. Thanks.
Most of the conspiranuts out there seem to think that Apollo 11 was the first shot to the space. They would understand a lot of things only by seeing this excellent documentary.
I’m ashamed to come from a country where so many people don’t believe in one of humanities crowning achievements. I feel like most of these conspiracy people haven’t accomplished a damn thing in their little lives therefore nobody else has either. Some people just can’t grasp that there are people out there way smarter them. So many people believe they are the smartest person on the block and everybody else are idiots. Dunning Kruger rears it’s dumb head yer again.
more than 2 generations later, the Europe, china, japan space programs are still figuring out how to land man safely on the moon and return to earth. Can the current NASA replicate this momentous feat during my grandfather's youth?
@@edgardovillacorte7012 I haven't know of any project regarding manned missions to the moon from Europe, Japan or China. Have you?
Oh God! Let’s hope this isn’t the sum total of their education on the topic. Though by all appearances that’s precisely the case.
@@cotati76
Our Uncle (of whom we’re very proud) is John Aaron. He and best friend Jerry Bostick taught us about NASA and the travails of the science that got those Astronauts to the moon and home again.
Perhaps the children here (NOT YOU @COTALI 76 ) may want to google them. It was quite unlike what was presented here.
Good lunch, kiddos.
Totally awesome! Thank you!
RIP Neil Armstrong, Alan Shepard, John Glenn, Gus Grissom, Gene Cernan, Ed White, Roger Chaffee, Gordon Cooper, Elliot See, John Young, Ron Evans, Charles Bassett, Pete
Conrad, Vladimir Komarov, Yuri Gagarin, Sally Ride
If it takes 18,000 mph to leave earth atmosphere then how how come it took so long to get to moon 250,000 miles away ( at that speed they should've made it to the moon in 15 hrs ).
Would they not maintain that same speed ( 18,000 ) because there are no air molicules to slow the spaceship down ?
Silence heretic, the high priests of scientism have spoken! You must bow your head, accept and obey their doctine lest ye be sentenced to death by poison hemlock!
They didn't travel to the Moon in a straight line.
Also, they DID slow down, due to gravity. Think of the space craft doing little more than a big "jump" to the Moon.
"Would they not maintain that same speed"
No, because GRAVITY. They're still within earth's gravity, pulling at them & slowing them down.
@Cliff Yablonski Im not in school.. I already have my degree.. unfortunately its not in physics or astronomy. However I think my question is relevant tho..
Cliff you must be a genius, I can tell by your insults, name calling and rude behavior. I bet you can’t wait to buy a nice lot on the moon so you won’t have to deal with all us dumb asses down here. Your struggles are real!
Good video, but where did they go poop? Or, , , did they fast the whole way ?
They had special bags. Gross, I know!
Look up “Apollo bags”
0:51 that's how Neil got his strong arm meh meh meh
LOL LOL LOL LOL good one :)
interestingly they narrowed down 33 guys down to one that looked like the spitting image of Yuri Gagarin!
“1 stone” is such a stupid measure. Does anyone else than UK use that?
I have thrown a few in my day. Not from the UK. ;)
I always wanted to see them fly one of the shuttles to the moon. Carry the lunar module in the cargo bay. That would have been cool
Michael Szczys the furthest the shuttle went was about 400 miles, but had to turn back as radiation was effecting the astronauts, one of the reasons I believe all Apollo astronauts went no further than low earth orbit
ste c The Shuttle was too heavy to be pushed higher. Plus it wasn't equipped for a deep space mission.
Radiation has to be recognized as a long term danger, but as long as you aren't sitting in the thickest parts, you survive just fine.
You have been watching to much deep space 9 lol
It couldn’t. It had too little full and its ”heat shield” wasn’t designen to withstand the speed it would achive from Moons orbit.
Live broadcast from the moon in 1969, lol. 50 years later and most still believe it. The show goes on :)
Lol hahaha
What beats me is the fact that if they didn't know about the moon and space in general how could they know to train for it ??????? NOBODY HAS EVER BEEN IN SPACE OR ON THE MOON ------- IT'S JUST ONE BIG HOAX AND THE LIE OF ALL MANKIND
Americans are so lovable.
most of the world knows about the Apollo missions, as missions were followed by several space agencies, some were used for communications when the american antennas couldn't point at the space craft. before and after Apollo, many lunar missions have transmitted info from the moon. in fact, the Soviet Union transmitted the first pictures oft he far side of the moon, in 1959.
Why not learn about the subject you post about, rather than make up garbage, or believe other morons?
R.I.P. glove 22:04 😭
wind must have got it?
Thanh nhan puan tu
An EVA requires a lot of physical effort?! Can anybody explain why?
Just the ones on later Gemini missions. The men were tumbling sometimes blind. By the time dick gordon got himself under control, he told pete conrad that he was wiped out and needed to rest.
The difference in air pressure between the inside of the suit and the outside of the suit makes the suit expand and basically become rigid and hard to move in. I went to a museum once with a space exhibit and one of the things they had was a small vacuum chamber with a glove in it, and you could experience what its like to move your hand in a vacuum. It's a lot tougher than you'd think
@@iiRaptusGaming . .Good point, proving fraud during most if not all EVA's where no evidence of pressure is seen. More recently when bubbles are also seen to escape, just as occurs during underwater simulation, the reality becomes apparent. Underwater tanks designed to conduct such training have all of the identical gear necessary to replicate space craft as well as suits used for the EVA's. Only the addition of a colored backdrop is necessary in order to add a background layer providing a view of the Earth from orbit. While it seems clear enough that shuttle flights are a reality, EVA's are another story. The bubbles that escape occasionally are seen to behave precisely as expected when escaping an underwater enclosure (the suit, at the helmet ring and its point of attachment). No explanation is attempted or can be made for these, apparently assuming that no one would bother to notice. Another serious error is found in video aboard the ISS where glitches occur now and then that affect the astronauts alone, proving a layered image and a separate background source. The ability to stream CGI is advanced now for floating objects that they can interact with also. One interesting video has an astronaut reaching handling and placing an invisible object during an apparent glitch that occured so that the layer for the object was not visible to us. Having multiple sources creates a risk that some kind of error or bad connection will eliminate one feed and we will see something unexpected and unexplained.
@Kit Canyon . .Derogatory comments are non-stop from those who cannot answer. . So entertaining. . Don't quit now. .
We see it over and over again. .
The environment in space is not harsh. Because there are no predators - Maxwell Archer
So What-
Mark Anderson
Only predator is the van allen radiation belt 😂and space debris and space trash
And extreme temperatures, both cold and hot, that humans can not survive - especially in that joke of a space suit.
@J Calhoun so the sun faces u and there is no atmosphere slowing the heat stuff . There is nothing warming u in space so.
@@brshoggalyboogaly7237 ya i forgot about them..
No comment...click gone....
thanks we are glad.. click gone..
I cant understand that how to return the moon surface to earth atmosphere....?
You don’t understand how they returned from Moons surface back to Earth? Just study available information about projekt Apollo.
That’s because they didn’t. The whole thing is a lie. Merely damage control. Their Satanic construct is beginning to unravel. Wake up my friends. We have been lied to for generations, the oligarchy is losing their grip.
@@robertmurphy5105 : it seems you are losing your grip.
LegoLord. True, it couldn't be done- in LEGO.
Shailesh Chaudhary They used rocket engines, just like when they flew from Earth.
FIREBALL XL5