@@vanguardian2864 "Google it."....When I Googled "How Does Vanguardian define morality", the top result stated: "Google can not read Vanguardians mind to know how they define any word.", though further down the results I came across: "The definition they use does not work for all applications and therefore must be flawed."...So there you have it...Google either can not read your mind, or thinks your definition must be flawed....sorry... So, can you provide the definition in order for us to see it, or is it super secret and we first must believe in the bible before the definition of morality can be revealed to us... ;) I mean if you can not define the words you use then you literally don't know what you're talking about...LITERALLY...lol..You just become a joke at that point....so thanks for the laugh...
As organized religion instilling core values slowly fades away, objective morality has become more and more arbitrary as time goes on and it makes me realize how truly insane this world is and always was…
As the world gets crazier, objective morality becomes more relevant. It doesn’t go aware just because life becomes so luxurious and privileged to the point that we forget we have problems
@@vanguardian2864 Can you elaborate? how does privilege and luxury aid to negate morality? I’m more worried about individualistic patterns emerging and what that implies for the long term.
A long winded and pompous way of confirming that yeah morals are real, abstract concepts that describe codes of conduct which may differ depending on the culture. Ofcourse there's no human society that won't intuitively recognise unprovoked killing as a moral wrongdoing. As I see it all this is an extension of the discussion around cultural relativism and platonic ideals. ... talking of long winded huh
Pompous and long-winded indeed. Hate to break it to you, but there are reasons why some cultures thrive and others don’t. Equality is an allusion. Sorry if that hurts your dysfunctional postmodern “sensibilities,” but it’s true.
@Blake Vitali Japan and Poland come to mind given how they embrace tradition and being humongous, culturally and ethnically. The US is suffering the most in left-wing areas that reject these things and instead preaching repressive tolerance and degeneracy.
@@vanguardian2864 "Equality is an allusion."...Did you mean illusion, or do you define allusion some weird way to make that statement logical? I can understand a typo, but you seem to have a problem understanding the definition of the words you use, and I am trying to help you at least see your mistakes so you do not continue to make them...This may have just been a typo, but if not then define the word to see the problem...
were you listening? your description doesn't fit what he actually said in the video. god damn, why every time some philosophical stuff like morality comes up, all the tardies come out of the woodworks and act like they're smarter than the guy talking meanwhile they couldn't even follow his argument. it's embarrassing and cringe.
"God instructed us on Morality it's in the Hebrew Bible."....Can you define "Morality"? Do you consider foreign chattel slavery to be moral or immoral?
@@vDev00 I can appreciate that you are not claiming a religion to be true, but that does not help me understand your position. Do you believe the Bible is the inspired word of God and all true, or just part of it, as not all people who believe the Bible is true consider their belief to be part of a "religion"?. I do not know what position you are taking, as your above statement is confusing. Can you clarify your point so that I can either agree with you or question your reasoning?
Morality is real as well as objective truth.
Can you define "morality" so I know what you mean?
Google it.
@@vanguardian2864 "Google it."....When I Googled "How Does Vanguardian define morality", the top result stated: "Google can not read Vanguardians mind to know how they define any word.", though further down the results I came across: "The definition they use does not work for all applications and therefore must be flawed."...So there you have it...Google either can not read your mind, or thinks your definition must be flawed....sorry...
So, can you provide the definition in order for us to see it, or is it super secret and we first must believe in the bible before the definition of morality can be revealed to us... ;)
I mean if you can not define the words you use then you literally don't know what you're talking about...LITERALLY...lol..You just become a joke at that point....so thanks for the laugh...
@@GuessWhoAsks Morality is the path that leads to heaven.
@@tarikwalters854 "Morality is the path that leads to heaven."...Is that how you properly define "morality"???
As organized religion instilling core values slowly fades away, objective morality has become more and more arbitrary as time goes on and it makes me realize how truly insane this world is and always was…
As the world gets crazier, objective morality becomes more relevant. It doesn’t go aware just because life becomes so luxurious and privileged to the point that we forget we have problems
@@vanguardian2864 Can you elaborate? how does privilege and luxury aid to negate morality? I’m more worried about individualistic patterns emerging and what that implies for the long term.
That is why a return of religion is essential.
It is real...laws of the universe. Break them & you suffer the consequences, but
anyone can decide or convince themselves they don't exist.
Totally agree. We cannot the break the laws of this universe.
What "laws of the universe." are you stating is real?
@@AnnTsungMD What are you calling a "law of this universe"?
@@GuessWhoAsks Law of attraction. Law of karma. Law of reciprocity. To name a few.
@@AnnTsungMD Define "law" and "attraction" ...so that law of attraction has meaning...
A long winded and pompous way of confirming that yeah morals are real, abstract concepts that describe codes of conduct which may differ depending on the culture. Ofcourse there's no human society that won't intuitively recognise unprovoked killing as a moral wrongdoing. As I see it all this is an extension of the discussion around cultural relativism and platonic ideals. ... talking of long winded huh
Pompous and long-winded indeed.
Hate to break it to you, but there are reasons why some cultures thrive and others don’t. Equality is an allusion. Sorry if that hurts your dysfunctional postmodern “sensibilities,” but it’s true.
@@vanguardian2864 right and which cultures are thriving?
@Blake Vitali Japan and Poland come to mind given how they embrace tradition and being humongous, culturally and ethnically. The US is suffering the most in left-wing areas that reject these things and instead preaching repressive tolerance and degeneracy.
@@vanguardian2864 "Equality is an allusion."...Did you mean illusion, or do you define allusion some weird way to make that statement logical? I can understand a typo, but you seem to have a problem understanding the definition of the words you use, and I am trying to help you at least see your mistakes so you do not continue to make them...This may have just been a typo, but if not then define the word to see the problem...
were you listening? your description doesn't fit what he actually said in the video. god damn, why every time some philosophical stuff like morality comes up, all the tardies come out of the woodworks and act like they're smarter than the guy talking meanwhile they couldn't even follow his argument. it's embarrassing and cringe.
Simple answer: yes it is.
The way out of that is Christ.
Can you define "morality"?
@@GuessWhoAsks Actions which or which is not in harmony with Natural Law
God instructed us on Morality it's in the Hebrew Bible.
"God instructed us on Morality it's in the Hebrew Bible."....Can you define "Morality"? Do you consider foreign chattel slavery to be moral or immoral?
@@GuessWhoAsksslavery is immoral because it breaks the natural law of free will
Not free will let correct that “Freedom” which is a natraul law
@@GuessWhoAsksI’m also not religious
@@vDev00 I can appreciate that you are not claiming a religion to be true, but that does not help me understand your position. Do you believe the Bible is the inspired word of God and all true, or just part of it, as not all people who believe the Bible is true consider their belief to be part of a "religion"?. I do not know what position you are taking, as your above statement is confusing. Can you clarify your point so that I can either agree with you or question your reasoning?