This was crazy to see. I own the San Martin and I have to admit it gets more wrist time than almost any other watch I own it just wears for me like a dream. Great video
Please take a look at Seestern MAS homage! I suppose they are San Martin's top competitor. (also I personally like their name, logo and styling far better)
@@SirWow1990 thanks for the info! I've seen the review of their 4th gen MAS in which the bezel was stated to be good compared to San Martin's MAS specifically, but who knows. Which model do you have in mind?
@@OverCowboy At one point I had two 62 MASes, gray and blue dial and also orange dial Doxa 300 homage. All three had bezels that were much too stiff for my liking. On the other hand, I also had SM retro diver (SN004 if I recall correctly) and SN0121T that I still have. Both San Martins’ bezels were much better feeling than Seestern ones, as good as I would dare to hope to have in 200-250$ watch.
@@OverCowboy Other features however are as good in Seesterns as are in San Martins or very close to. Dial/hands quality, amount of lume used, crystal clarity, even case finishing was quite close. Besides the bezels I could only say that movements were not so well regulated in Seesterns as they were in SMs.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 91 | คู่เอก "คมอาวุธ vs อเล็กเซย์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/V0RkEfYFsgM/mqdefault.jpg)
This video is as much about San Martins quality control as Seiko's lack thereof. Kinda wild when its a 1:10 price ratio between the two
Man this just proves what we all know…nice video
This was crazy to see. I own the San Martin and I have to admit it gets more wrist time than almost any other watch I own it just wears for me like a dream. Great video
This should make Seiko do some soul searching.
Please take a look at Seestern MAS homage! I suppose they are San Martin's top competitor. (also I personally like their name, logo and styling far better)
Seesterns in my experience have rubbish bezel action, very stiff and uncomfortable.
@@SirWow1990 thanks for the info! I've seen the review of their 4th gen MAS in which the bezel was stated to be good compared to San Martin's MAS specifically, but who knows. Which model do you have in mind?
@@OverCowboy At one point I had two 62 MASes, gray and blue dial and also orange dial Doxa 300 homage. All three had bezels that were much too stiff for my liking. On the other hand, I also had SM retro diver (SN004 if I recall correctly) and SN0121T that I still have. Both San Martins’ bezels were much better feeling than Seestern ones, as good as I would dare to hope to have in 200-250$ watch.
@@SirWow1990 Thank you! That's good to know
@@OverCowboy Other features however are as good in Seesterns as are in San Martins or very close to. Dial/hands quality, amount of lume used, crystal clarity, even case finishing was quite close. Besides the bezels I could only say that movements were not so well regulated in Seesterns as they were in SMs.
Phenomenal video, and proves the point perfectly - a $300 having as good finish quality if not better than a more than $5,000 watch...
Anyone know if the bracelet for the San Martin NS007 fits the SJE093?
I knew I bought that san Martin for good reason. Oh wait, it was the price. Ha. I'm happier now.
👀 oof 🤣 nice video 👍👍
I think someone got a fake Seiko.
Of course not.
I can declare that it is not a fake Seiko.
@@ondrejsvoboda1742Thanks Andy 👍
Anyone here can gift me 200 or 100m dive watch so i can do my watery job in my daily life!
buy alba, a sub brand and quality of seiko, will cost you under usd 100 with 200 meters resistant