@@zaheer855 So what? Charging expensive money doesn't make you effective. Even I can place high rates on my shop goods and then say my shop is the "best in the town"
@@zaheer855 Oh really? Just because i charge high doesnt mean I deliver enough and btw his statements which have been "live streamed" in court are absurd and even a simpleton could know if you simply watched his immigrant arguments...
😂 k.sibal you change from now on, you are in the waning period of life, and none other than criminals would threaten you so don't beat round the bush to become a savior/messiah for WB govt.
Why not ? He has defended criminals from JK and in congress party, many more from all criminal activities, that's why he perhaps has a swiss account too as was doing rounds, presently the great casting couch lawyer has taken up as replacement for k.sibal.
Every citizen has right to see the live stream .The court is a public place .Let the Lawyers adopt the system . People will also understand the system of proceedings and get Educated .It is good for every one.
Kapil Sibal is being exposed and he said himself his reputation of 50 years is being ruined. He lost his credibility a long time ago for defending the indefensible. He is truly being exposed and being humiliated in court.😂😂😂😂😂😂 😂😂😂
Am completely in favour of live streaming of judicial proceedings. It gives me a clear idea of the competence and objectivity of each side of the arguement.
I vote for live streaming. The procedure ensures transparency in conduct of the court and the counsel as well. Also live steaming provides opportunity to the parties to know how his/her case is being presented and argued at the court by the respective advocates.
Live streaming is seriously helping the general public to understand litigation topics better, legal matters better. They are creating a sense of awareness. They are really helping to know the fact that the democracy would have been dysfunctional without courts and without our beloved, respected Honorable Judges. Judges are really becoming close to the public at large.
As for kapil why is he complaining. He is getting free publicity. If he is correct in his practise then why should he hide and be against live streaming. Something not right
Live streaming of trials from the highest court of the land is an epitome of transparency. It shouldn't be roll back. Citizens have a right to know about what happens during the proceedings of cases which has a direct impact on the constitutional rights, legal protections and social moorings of the nation as a whole.
Court should be published. So that public should also evaluate the court proceedings. They also must be punished for not doing their duties. Dr Sakharkar
The objection is in perfect tune with the culture of extreme secrecy in justice. Adjourned for hearing. When will it be heard? Judgement reserved! When will judgement delivered? Even if, the parties will not get a copy as a matter of right, unless asked for. Even if asked, it has its own share of procedural delay and payments.. Where there's reason to be worried, iron curtain bis the remedy. It's amusing to claim justice is so shaming!
He is one of the best judges of Karnataka High Court. He really gets angry when he knows the unfair is happeneing and culprits are being supported by lawyers and advocates. He fires on them. He hasalways stood against the congress or bjp state govt of they are at fault. He has always been unbiased and made his voice heard when he stood by farmers, common people etc. No action is required. Srishananda sir is a seasoned judge and has given many landmark judgements. Respect to him for standing by the public in all instances 🙏🏼 SC couldnt see many other times when its own judges made such comments even during Nupur Sharma issue against Hindus. It is the irony of the state secularism in India. Even in the case against the statements made to the women, she was supporting culprit who has not paid income tax and had been cheating govt and also tried to put false accusations of theft on the opponent which was so evident. They had dealings with black money and had taken 20 lakh in cash. Chief Justice was angry and took the right side. Yes that statement could've been avoided but to people who support such criminals, need to be dealt with that way. Full support to Karnataka Justice Sri Srishananda Sir 🙏🏼
It should be live-streamed. The court is dealing with daily life issues of common people in India. Why to put our right of Right to information at stake for the reputation of some advocates? Those who are doing their duty and service with real dedication no need to worry about what will others think, if they see how they works.
I have seen it, it is a mess. Judges talk like they are colonial masters, lawyers address to them like they are addressing British officer and they are slaves. So many people just standing speaking at the same time. It is a mess. Now watch American courts proceeding. It is much more peaceful, understandable, and civilised
It gives account how many judges working.how many gives bail and takes rest. Only place modernisation never far in Indian courts. Govt fully failed in justice depts.punishment for common man.not culprits or currupted politicans.Sibil aim make money.he is not honest Advocate.he donot know what is honesty.
Let's not discuss on one individual and there are many advantages. Time to improve the judicial process and prepare thoroughly. The advantages of live-streaming court proceedings in India include increased transparency, promoting public understanding of the judicial process, and ensuring accountability. It allows citizens to witness the legal system in action, fostering trust and confidence. Live streaming also serves as an educational tool for law students and the general public, helping demystify court proceedings and making justice more accessible to everyone.
DESH DROHI LIKE SIBBAL DO NOT WANT TO TAKE BLAME FOR ALL CASSES, THEY ARE LOOSING. VINASH KARREB HAI SIBBAL KA THE NEXT GENERATION WILL REMEMBER FOR ALL CASES OF HE FOUGHT AGAINST THE NATION AND FOR THE TERRORIST AND ANTINATIONALS
I am endorsing LiveStreaming bcoz we must know both litigants lawyers presentation to judges. Citizens have a right for 1st hand info not journo reports.
not expected from firstpost to oppose live streaming ! these courts ,lawyers like sibal think they are above the country , about time people realise his evilface through live streaming
Yes it is uncomfortable if camera install at your work. BUT there is not excuse in Court case. In Court decision are made for life and death. So it should be transparent. In the corrupted society we need live stream.
Sibal’s sarcasm in court during the RG Kar hearing is surely what got him into someone’s cross wire. So instead of whining and whimpering at getting exposed for his true colours, he should stop making mockery out of horrendous and inhuman cases and maintain some decency in court.
We must accept that in india we r not professional enough for live streaming. With children and teens of impressionable age having access to such stuff and no safeguards r specified. I dont know if any orientation programme was held for judges/lawyers before it started. I dont like even parliament proceedings broadcast live given the unruly behaviour of politicians which has become a routine. Many r using such broadcast for gaining cheap popularity at the cost of decorum of the parliament. The debate at times becomes so low grade that it shocks me. And how about our media both print and others? To use the case highlighted in this story itself, i.e. Kolkata rg kar case. They banned the taking of name of the victim. But media found another way out. The way postmortem reports were used highlighting the "quantity of liquid found" was absolute shocker. It was also a voilation of victim's privacy. Almost all channels ran it loudly. It was kind of titillating porn stuff thing raising questions about erhical aspect of news reporting . There should be action on those who leaked the report to media. Our channels use such captions and use such tone that it becomes sensational without realising its implications on society our countries involved. And nobody is even debating wheather there should be guidelines on use of words/tone in reporting.
Just rip off the immunity status given to the so-called lawmakers, you will see them behaving better and worst aspect is maybe 90 percent of these lawmakers are lawbreakers so dont expect decorum.
Thats quite rubbish, no where is it written like that. Many cases from the common people have been sorted out in the Supreme court as its the apex body of Justice and controls the bottom layer of the justice system. First learn and then comment...
ALL THE COURTS IN INDIA SHOULD BE ON LIVE TELECAST OF PROCEEDINGS. THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY AND COURT SHOULD COME FORWARD TO TELECAST LIVE TO REACH THE PEOPLE. ANY FORWARD THINKING WOULD ALWAYS HAVE OBSTRUCTIONS...
most big democracy are smaller than biggest democracy that is India, and we should set an example, its time to be number 1 rather than following the audio recording counterparts of the world
If live streaming is stopped for whatsoever reason , nation will loose faith in supreme court . Nations integrity is held by faith in inportant systems like juidicary , dont touch this faith , nation will break down.
Why Sibal is afraid of Live Streaming??
The same reason you are afraid of live streaming.
@@user-je7pc2mp5ewhat an idiotic argument kiddo
Sibal is a politician wearing a lawyer's garb.
bot spotted on every comment 😂
Unimportant News
Kapil sibal is worried his foolish arguments will be exposed 😂
Yes! They are as foolish as his claims of death threats.
Foolish arguments? He is probably the most expensive lawyer in all of India currently.
@@zaheer855 So what? Charging expensive money doesn't make you effective. Even I can place high rates on my shop goods and then say my shop is the "best in the town"
@@Game_Reaper that's the most childish argument I ever heard, the amount you can charge is driven by your ability to deliver.
@@zaheer855 Oh really? Just because i charge high doesnt mean I deliver enough and btw his statements which have been "live streamed" in court are absurd and even a simpleton could know if you simply watched his immigrant arguments...
The ones who defended terrorists are now complaining about reputation 😂.
I do not agree to Kapil Sibals view that his reputation is tarnished. I never felt he had any to start with.
😂 k.sibal you change from now on, you are in the waning period of life, and none other than criminals would threaten you so don't beat round the bush to become a savior/messiah for WB govt.
😂😂😂
Well said
Kapil sibbal has reputation ? 😂🤣
@@darshitpatel1806 😂
Why not ? He has defended criminals from JK and in congress party, many more from all criminal activities, that's why he perhaps has a swiss account too as was doing rounds, presently the great casting couch lawyer has taken up as replacement for k.sibal.
😂😂😂😂😂
Yes, reputed liar
Like for live streaming of cases
Lawyers signed a petition to halt live streaming !!! Seems like the crooks are banding together to avoid public embarrassment😅
Sibal is afraid of his foolishness and Mamata's puppet.
Every citizen has right to see the live stream .The court is a public place .Let the Lawyers adopt the system .
People will also understand the system of proceedings and get Educated .It is good for every one.
We all work under cameras then why not lawyers like sibal.
Why kapila sibbal is afraid to live streaming 😊.this man has exposed first time in Kolkata rape case ❤😊
Why don't you live stream yourself? What are you afraid of?
@@user-je7pc2mp5e bravo, it is not his personal space. Court proceedings live telicaste improves transparency
@@user-je7pc2mp5ewhat an idiotic argument
You are a congress supporter, aren't you?
@@user-je7pc2mp5e👉 🤡, has sibbal given you money to write such illogical comments 😂😂
@@user-je7pc2mp5ei68oyu8uyyyyî666i6866668y6yiii8yyiîy6y88i6yiîi6îyi8uuyî8i6iy6y6666y6u6yi88î66iiy866y86uoiy8afakyeqiyte
Judiciary must be accounted for their choices just like all other people are held accountable for their decisiond
Kapil Sibal is being exposed and he said himself his reputation of 50 years is being ruined. He lost his credibility a long time ago for defending the indefensible. He is truly being exposed and being humiliated in court.😂😂😂😂😂😂 😂😂😂
Indefensibles are only criminals for k.sibal not common poor man.
I agree, we need transparency.
Only thieves are afraid to be seen on duty.
It must be live streaming. Lawyers must be honest.
Am completely in favour of live streaming of judicial proceedings. It gives me a clear idea of the competence and objectivity of each side of the arguement.
I vote for live streaming. The procedure ensures transparency in conduct of the court and the counsel as well. Also live steaming provides opportunity to the parties to know how his/her case is being presented and argued at the court by the respective advocates.
Democracy and Transparency should go hand in hand.
Their conscience is limited to not getting caught doing the act rather than not doing the act at all.
Live streaming is seriously helping the general public to understand litigation topics better, legal matters better. They are creating a sense of awareness. They are really helping to know the fact that the democracy would have been dysfunctional without courts and without our beloved, respected Honorable Judges. Judges are really becoming close to the public at large.
As for kapil why is he complaining. He is getting free publicity. If he is correct in his practise then why should he hide and be against live streaming. Something not right
Transparency is must😊
We people want to know how the judiciary systems are working.
high courts should also live stream
When normal people can sit in court room , why cant it be live streamed ???????? Wtf was kapti sibals saying
Just rememberd the dialogue from GOT "im not questioning your honor, kapil sibal, im denying its existence"
Live streaming of court should be compulsory either lower court or high court or supreme court.
The worries of senior counsel like Mr. Sibal, are 😅😅😅😅.
@ paragon of free society
Yes it must be people have to see it live, how our judiciary works
Live streaming of trials from the highest court of the land is an epitome of transparency. It shouldn't be roll back. Citizens have a right to know about what happens during the proceedings of cases which has a direct impact on the constitutional rights, legal protections and social moorings of the nation as a whole.
Court should be published. So that public should also evaluate the court proceedings. They also must be punished for not doing their duties.
Dr Sakharkar
Martyr Tilottama, like Martyr Khudiram. When WB TMC Govt is the conspirator, Justice is not possible. TMC Govt must resign.
Sibbal should be fined and expelled from court for this remark.
Live streaming must continue, so that people can also take on judges and lawyers on theirr responsible behavior
Dr Sakharkar
The objection is in perfect tune with the culture of extreme secrecy in justice. Adjourned for hearing. When will it be heard? Judgement reserved! When will judgement delivered? Even if, the parties will not get a copy as a matter of right, unless asked for. Even if asked, it has its own share of procedural delay and payments.. Where there's reason to be worried, iron curtain bis the remedy. It's amusing to claim justice is so shaming!
Live streaming is required transparency everybody s mind will be clear
Being a lawyer live streaming is important and everyone in this society be accountable of what they do.
All the courts has to stream the proceedings
He is one of the best judges of Karnataka High Court. He really gets angry when he knows the unfair is happeneing and culprits are being supported by lawyers and advocates. He fires on them. He hasalways stood against the congress or bjp state govt of they are at fault. He has always been unbiased and made his voice heard when he stood by farmers, common people etc. No action is required. Srishananda sir is a seasoned judge and has given many landmark judgements. Respect to him for standing by the public in all instances 🙏🏼 SC couldnt see many other times when its own judges made such comments even during Nupur Sharma issue against Hindus. It is the irony of the state secularism in India. Even in the case against the statements made to the women, she was supporting culprit who has not paid income tax and had been cheating govt and also tried to put false accusations of theft on the opponent which was so evident. They had dealings with black money and had taken 20 lakh in cash. Chief Justice was angry and took the right side. Yes that statement could've been avoided but to people who support such criminals, need to be dealt with that way. Full support to Karnataka Justice Sri Srishananda Sir 🙏🏼
I agree with you, but he has tendency to make casual and unrelated comments during proceedings, which supposed to be done outside the court hours
It should be live-streamed.
The court is dealing with daily life issues of common people in India.
Why to put our right of Right to information at stake for the reputation of some advocates?
Those who are doing their duty and service with real dedication no need to worry about what will others think, if they see how they works.
TRANSPARENCY WITH REALITY MEANS EVERY THING. SATYA MEVA JAYATHE🙏🙏🙏.
It should be live streamed
I have seen it, it is a mess.
Judges talk like they are colonial masters, lawyers address to them like they are addressing British officer and they are slaves.
So many people just standing speaking at the same time. It is a mess.
Now watch American courts proceeding. It is much more peaceful, understandable, and civilised
Somebody must tell Kapil Sibal, he doesn't have to worry about his reputation being tarnished,It already is.
Thanks to this we get to see the neet case
And also the kolkata case😢
Live steaming is must
Live streaming is important for transparency,
When lawyers deeds gimmicks are laid bare natural
But let nation these Tribes
Unprofessional misdeamour
Bordering on rowdyism get
Highlighted
I was feeling good watching the news until the sibbal name came out, my rage bar increased in seconds.
It gives account how many judges working.how many gives bail and takes rest. Only place modernisation never far in Indian courts.
Govt fully failed in justice depts.punishment for common man.not culprits or currupted politicans.Sibil aim make money.he is not honest Advocate.he donot know what is honesty.
we have to know
Let's not discuss on one individual and there are many advantages. Time to improve the judicial process and prepare thoroughly.
The advantages of live-streaming court proceedings in India include increased transparency, promoting public understanding of the judicial process, and ensuring accountability. It allows citizens to witness the legal system in action, fostering trust and confidence. Live streaming also serves as an educational tool for law students and the general public, helping demystify court proceedings and making justice more accessible to everyone.
DESH DROHI LIKE SIBBAL DO NOT WANT TO TAKE BLAME FOR ALL CASSES, THEY ARE LOOSING.
VINASH KARREB HAI SIBBAL KA
THE NEXT GENERATION WILL REMEMBER FOR ALL CASES OF HE FOUGHT AGAINST THE NATION AND FOR THE TERRORIST AND ANTINATIONALS
Wish aapka prediction 100% ho to mai aapko ek behtreen sweet khilaunga😊
Well said and God bless you for telling the truth.
Ignorance of law.. Is not an excuse... But in our education system.. Not a single word taught about law.. What a joke..?? Very unfortunate...
In the end of the day, they are working for people and people have right to know
I am endorsing LiveStreaming bcoz we must know both litigants lawyers presentation to judges. Citizens have a right for 1st hand info not journo reports.
Absolutely in favour of live streaming... let the public know what is happening.. if they don't have anything to hide, why should anyone object
Court should be Live Streamed ....it shows the reality of flaws of Justice System
that particular judge is known for his more casual remarks than limited to the case
Judges may also be tempted to playing to the gallery!😂
To get the truth
not expected from firstpost to oppose live streaming ! these courts ,lawyers like sibal think they are above the country , about time people realise his evilface through live streaming
KAPIL SIBBAL HAS TARNISHED HIS AND INDIA NAME ONNO OF OCCASIONS JUST FOR MONEY
Swiss account should be looked into.
👌👍👏🙌🤝
Recently i saw a yt short where a judge called a young lawyer" rubbish garbage" and some rude things without any provocation from that lawyer.
And these kind of things should be exposed , not supressed
There is one and only one type of reputation Kapil Sibbal has
Defending the criminals, shame on you k.sibal.
Kapil Sibal lost his reputation and respect. He enjoyed enough by hiding in bush
Kyu na kare stream , itna badhiya badhiya meme material aata hai waha se .😂
Sibbal is ex-law minister, what a cheap joke on all Indians! His cheezhy arguments are being live streamed......😂😂😂
He is delusional if he thinks he had any reputation left even before this case.
Yes it is uncomfortable if camera install at your work. BUT there is not excuse in Court case. In Court decision are made for life and death. So it should be transparent. In the corrupted society we need live stream.
If the live stream is stopped; corruption will reach its zenith.
Correct. No one can comment, what we do
😢
Sibal’s sarcasm in court during the RG Kar hearing is surely what got him into someone’s cross wire. So instead of whining and whimpering at getting exposed for his true colours, he should stop making mockery out of horrendous and inhuman cases and maintain some decency in court.
Kapil Sibal needs to worry about what he has, one can't lose what he doesn't have. Did he say loss of reputation ?
We must accept that in india we r not professional enough for live streaming. With children and teens of impressionable age having access to such stuff and no safeguards r specified. I dont know if any orientation programme was held for judges/lawyers before it started.
I dont like even parliament proceedings broadcast live given the unruly behaviour of politicians which has become a routine. Many r using such broadcast for gaining cheap popularity at the cost of decorum of the parliament. The debate at times becomes so low grade that it shocks me.
And how about our media both print and others? To use the case highlighted in this story itself, i.e. Kolkata rg kar case. They banned the taking of name of the victim. But media found another way out. The way postmortem reports were used highlighting the "quantity of liquid found" was absolute shocker. It was also a voilation of victim's privacy. Almost all channels ran it loudly. It was kind of titillating porn stuff thing raising questions about erhical aspect of news reporting . There should be action on those who leaked the report to media.
Our channels use such captions and use such tone that it becomes sensational without realising its implications on society our countries involved. And nobody is even debating wheather there should be guidelines on use of words/tone in reporting.
Just rip off the immunity status given to the so-called lawmakers, you will see them behaving better and worst aspect is maybe 90 percent of these lawmakers are lawbreakers so dont expect decorum.
Cji sir
Yes Live streaming must be there.. how will we get direct information and true information.. as most of news channel are under political parties.
September
28
Issue
Usually
21.10.2010
to
24.07.2013
Highcourt is better then supreme, in supreme court only Richest people can win not a truth.
Thats quite rubbish, no where is it written like that. Many cases from the common people have been sorted out in the Supreme court as its the apex body of Justice and controls the bottom layer of the justice system. First learn and then comment...
ALL THE COURTS IN INDIA SHOULD BE ON LIVE TELECAST OF PROCEEDINGS. THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY AND COURT SHOULD COME FORWARD TO TELECAST LIVE TO REACH THE PEOPLE. ANY FORWARD THINKING WOULD ALWAYS HAVE OBSTRUCTIONS...
Indian supreme court also likes to promote crypto-currency through live streaming 😂
_How would you feel if you had a camera at your workstation.. if your work was constantly streamed on youtube?_
I would feel like Palki Sharma. 😃😊
0:58 Mamata vagao 😂
If live streaming is there in lower courts - we can see different tricks for adjourning a case .
law is made for every citizen of a country.. If the people dnt have a legal knowledge... For whom sake.. Laws are made...???
Judge should be careful of what they speak. Change yourself first instead of halting live stream
Sibal : I will not have my honourable reputation questioned by the common man!
Common Man: I'm not questioning it. I'm denying it's very existence!
most big democracy are smaller than biggest democracy that is India, and we should set an example, its time to be number 1 rather than following the audio recording counterparts of the world
If live streaming is stopped for whatsoever reason , nation will loose faith in supreme court . Nations integrity is held by faith in inportant systems like juidicary , dont touch this faith , nation will break down.
Sibal's lies are getting caught by people. This is his real problem.
Sometimes comments from judges ( Those who supports Sr. Council's) make new entrants/Junior lawyer uncomfortable
When debate is against congress it should not be live, but for other congress want live stream
What the Karnataka judge said was true. why cant the SC judge accept that instead of worrying about sentiments of some people?
Peter Petticrew was the one behind it.
Even parliament has live streaming... Why should courts be any different?
So we stop live streaming , for some lawyer reputation , wow
CIRCUS CIRCUS CIRCUS 🎪 🎪 🎪 🤡🤡🤡