Strengthening Australia-U.S. Defence Industrial Cooperation: Keynote Panel
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ก.ค. 2024
- The CSIS Defense-Industrial Initiatives Group (DIIG) and Australia Chair will host a panel discussion with Kylie Wright, Assistant Secretary for Defence Industry International Policy, Australian Department of Defence; Brian Burton, U.S. Department of Defense, Senior Advisor for International and Industry Engagement, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Industrial Base Policy, U.S. Department of Defense; and Graham Chynoweth, Director of International Policy and Global Investments, Office of Strategic Capital, U.S. Department of Defense as part of the conference Strengthening Australia-U.S. Defence Industrial Cooperation.
Dr. Charles Edel, CSIS Senior Adviser and Australia Chair, will offer opening remarks for the event, and Dr. Cynthia R. Cook, Director of DIIG and a Senior Fellow in the International Security Program (ISP), will moderate the panel discussion.
This panel discussion will take place on Friday, April 5, 2024, from 9:30 am - 10:30 am EST. The live streamed discussion will focus on joint efforts between Australia and the United States to better integrate their industrial bases, identify opportunities for increased defense industrial cooperation, and address geostrategic threats in the Indo-Pacific region.
This event is part of a project sponsored by the Australian Department of Defence.
---------------------------------------------
A nonpartisan institution, CSIS is the top national security think tank in the world.
Visit www.csis.org to find more of our work as we bring bipartisan solutions to the world's greatest challenges.
Want to see more videos and virtual events? Subscribe to this channel and turn on notifications: cs.is/2dCfTve
Follow CSIS on:
• Twitter: csis
• Facebook: CSIS.org
• Instagram: csis
It was maybe 5 years ago that a survey was published that worried the ADF immensely. I'd look it up but I'm in the Carpathians with limited and periodic data. The gist of it was that the majority of Australians saw China as the most important player in the Pacific rim. This also reflected deepening trade ties between Oz and China and, potentially, a German-Russian energy-dependence analogue. The ADF and the government in Canberra were going to have to do a better job of informing Australian society and business about the strategic concerns in dealing so heavily with China and that a refresher on why the US was so important to Australia would be an on-going effort. I'm not so sure how much headway was made, but the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine was the wake-up call many Australians needed to realise not everyone in the world thinks like we do about trade and rule of law. I'm happy for conferences like this and particularly for someone like Secretary Yellen laying out in the open how China has been trying to play the game.
I would like to see China succeed in a way that doesn't undermine it's neighbours and "partners", but I was in Australia in July 1997 for the handover of Hong Kong, watching it late into the wee hours on the ABC. I don't think anyone thought it would go sideways so badly, and I struggle to see evidence that Xi will change how he runs the show anytime soon.
GCAP should be canceled and U.K, Japan should buy U.S made 6th gen aircraft.
Go go… preserve and protect Anglo Saxon world hegemony. Military industrial investments and cooperations by the West must have priority over investments, trade and cooperations devoted to mitigating climate change. Even though the latter efforts address an existential threat to all countries and societies, we rather live in a greatly diminished world ruled by the West than a multipolar world that is environmentally sound, equitable, prosperous and at peace.
would you rather rule the world than it be ruled by China
@@atulvaibhav5376 Which country and its alliance partners have politically subverted, militarily invaded other countries in the last fifty years, and maintain 800+ military bases throughout the world? Would you like your country to be the next one subverted and/or invaded because it refuses orders from that country? Hint: That country is not China. Please study history, it will do you and your country some good.
@@George-vt1xsThe NATO invasion of Afghanistan and the US-allied invasion of Iraq were very different in their goals (naive as they may have been) than the Russian invasion of Ukraine, which China supports. Putin has made genocidal claims on Ukraine -- that these 40-some-million people are Russians who have forgotten they're Russian, some Ukrainians vehemently deny -- and intends to rule the country from Moscow (once again). We're not having it.
China's rhetoric on Taiwan isn't much different, is it? You don't see Canadian, Mexican, Bahamian, or even Cuban governments seeking allainces to support them against American invasion. Yet Vietnam, the Philippines, and even India are fearful of Chinese aggression. Obviously if you're a former SSR your fearful of Russian invasion as it's happened twice. And what are the stated goals of Iran and North Korea? Not very neighbourly, are they? So what is it that seems so obvious about Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea (along with lesser partners like Venezuela) being in cahoots with each other that doesn't seem so clear to you? Not really the coalition of the humane and democratic is it?
@@George-vt1xs Which country is currently undergoing a massive build-up of maritime forces, the biggest since WW2? No one is going to invade China, so what does China need with a Navy that rivals the USN in size, why are they building 100,000t Super Carriers, if not to totally dominate the South and East China Seas, the West Pacific and to reintegrate the rebel province that sits off the East Coast. They have never been in any real danger since 1949, without a very strong blue water navy, so why do they need one now? China is invading countries, just being far more subtle about it than the US.
@@HarldinYou are right! Only the US can have a navy that sails all oceans and seas of the world, and regularly “patrol” off the coasts of its adversaries, as well as have a military budget that is larger than the combined budgets of next 9-10 countries combined. How dare any other country build a military that could credibly defend itself. China should prostrate itself to the great protector of democracy and human rights.